What Žižek and the Ljubljana School Get Wrong

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 13

  • @felixrossdorf4886
    @felixrossdorf4886 7 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

    As someone just learning about Poststructurelist Theory and thus just learning about Žižek's Theory this is very interesting to me. Love to see more!

    • @RahulSam
      @RahulSam  7 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

      I'm glad you’re finding it useful, my friend. I’m certainly a neophyte myself; however, I’d just add that Žižek is not a poststructuralist, although he no doubt works in that space.

  • @austinmackell9286
    @austinmackell9286 6 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Watching this is making me seasick.

    • @RahulSam
      @RahulSam  4 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Haha, why is that?

  • @allenanderson4567
    @allenanderson4567 6 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

    Lost me at "consciousness is an object". Of course you HAVE to think something like that to think that consciousness poses no problems for a view on which everything is an object. But that doesn't render the glaring category error of calling consciousness- the very possibility of phenomenally as such-an object coordinate with all other objects (which appear in consciousness) intelligible. It's analogous to the ontotheological error which mistakes Being for a being.

    • @RahulSam
      @RahulSam  4 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Fair criticism. As much as I respect Prof Harman's work, here's where I disagree with him.

  • @risamandell6050
    @risamandell6050 17 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

    AI overview: Object relations is a psychoanalytic theory that describes how people's early relationships with caregivers shape their adult relationships. It's a popular model used in dynamic psychotherapy

    • @RahulSam
      @RahulSam  13 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +2

      Not even close.

  • @MattGray_Chelsoph
    @MattGray_Chelsoph 16 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Fantastic, enjoying this very much thank you!

    • @RahulSam
      @RahulSam  13 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

      Great to hear, Matt!

  • @letdaseinlive
    @letdaseinlive 9 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

    Harman. Such a fake. Blah.. 😂

    • @RahulSam
      @RahulSam  8 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

      Haha, mate... I myself am a Žižekian and am not in agreement with all of Harman's views, but I certainly wouldn't call him a fake. Like Žižek, I think Harman is one of the most important philosophers of our time. Not to mention, he's genuinely a cordial person.

    • @letdaseinlive
      @letdaseinlive 8 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

      He's a fake. No sense of philosophy at all. Lots of fakes are important to wretched people; some of whom know he's a fake.