Mythbusters ANFO truck, there one second gone the next. Which explains why they used tubs of gasoline in movies instead, that is the only way you get to see anything.
So real explosions are: - Short - Loud crack - Fireball that's about 30% larger than explosive but lasts like half a second. - Shock wave doesn't throw you, instead basically knocks you down. - Shock wave will likely rupture your lungs. - Ears and Lungs are affected most - If you blow up a house fireballs will be about 1-2 seconds long. There will be small fires around. - Most dangerous thing is fragmentation that will practically blend you. Notes: - Shooting a gas tank will not make it explode - Pulling a pin with your teeth will basically be very awkward and embarrassing because it's very tough. May break your teeth.
He said you wouldn´t be able to pull the pin with your teeth. You would NOT pull the pin, ONLY break your teeth. It could be right. When you see actual footage of people using grenades, they do really jank very hard on the pin.
"So real explosions are: " "- Short " Instant. Not short. Instant. "- Loud crack " Yes. "- Fireball that's about 30% larger than explosive but lasts like half a second." No, an instant shockwave and then all you see is the smoke. The fireball is too fast to see except occasionally. "- Shock wave doesn't throw you, instead basically knocks you down." No, it turns your body into a bunch of unrecognizable pieces that simply fall down. "- Shock wave will likely rupture your lungs. " If it doesn't instantly kill you... Which it most likely will... "- Ears and Lungs are affected most " And the rest of your body which is turned into... I don't even know... A bunch of pieces... "- If you blow up a house fireballs will be about 1-2 seconds long. There will be small fires around. " If it's Gasoline then it will just burn down very quick. If you are talking about HE then no, the house will instantly shatter into a billion pieces. There won't be a fireball. Just smoke and fragments everywhere. "- Most dangerous thing is fragmentation that will practically blend you." True. Notes: "- Shooting a gas tank will not make it explode " True,
And having our name known by people won't get us being exorcised. We don't have anything to do with god,we are already dead so he won't do anything to us at all,he can only have influence on living entities,not us
It's only impossible in our own universe, but judging things based on the internal consistency and internal rules and logic of a piece of fiction makes a lot of sense. It just depends on which parts they telegraph as being "not like logic in our world". There's no real reason why explosions would work any differently in, say, X-men, but they do make clear that the way Wolverine works isn't like in our world, i.e. he regenerates. So then it's a matter of taking that internal logic into account.
@Katora Khan I'm not uptight. Stop shutting down people like that. If we can't hold a conversation without being patronizing and calling people uptight, we're not gonna get anywhere. If someone is being patronizing to me, I'm allowed to speak out against it. But instead you're blaming me? That's just backwards.
That fighting scene at the end of Main hoon na.... SRK falls, then the villain walks around him (in real time while SRK is still falling very slowly) and punches him all while SRK is in the air falling in “slow motion”.
The most ridiculous thing about this is trying to blow up a fuel tank on a moving truck. Dude, what did the truck driver ever do to you? He is just trying to make a living.
There is endless 4th wall breaking material for anyone who wants to point out how dumb most movies are if you bring in enough experts. It is not just explosions, military gargin, or how people actually do their jobs, but what plants/animals you see/hear for a specific region of the world.
For Transformers, the people aboard the aircraft are the real crew usually manning it, and he just told them what the end result had to be and let them do the talking as they would in real life. That's why the radio traffic is VERY accurate.
Yeah Bay has a great relationship with the DoD and he's never been turned down when asking for Military Aid in making his films. The Pentagon views them as recruitment ads.
they always have been. even scrubs, which isn’t the most accurate medically, gets the realities of being a medical intern a lot more right than shows like gray’s anatomy
@Councilman Les Wynan I disagree. A lot of infrastructure work uses controlled detonations. I mean not all the the time but I've never seen an "Explosives Engineer" major at any universities, so there's not a lot of people to call either I'd imagine. And you can probably do contract work with the military or maybe he is in the military.
Hey....he meant the explosions were almost real, but practically placing those explosives for blowing up the building that way may have been difficult.....so just considering the explosions it should be 6.5 atleast
@@peterinbrat Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't that only in case the bomb was close enough to shatter the windows, but not actually incinerate you? The shockwave from a nuke goes quite a distance.
I was an assaultman in the Marines (explosives, rockets, and breaching specialist) and my fiancee hates watching action movies with me because so many of the explosions are laughably exaggerated and unrealistic and I constantly point it out lol
you would be suprised actually. There are a lot of people in this line of work. Construction business, mining, tunneling, law enforcement and military, materials testing, chemistry departments, gun ranges, movie and effect specialists, fireworks people, etc etc.
I'm pretty sure he's just a college student who will most likely drop out or change subject next year but they brought him in and called him an expert for purpose of the video.
One thing he didn't mention is that all these explosions seem to be gasoline/petrol based. Gas explosions tend to look bigger and scarier because of that immense fireball they create, but they really aren't that dangerous to structures. Explosions created by dynamite like in Django Unchained or demolition charges like in The Dark Knight don't create that fireball, and military carpet bombs like in Transformers DEFINITELY don't. Movies just use those sort of gasoline explosions because they look cooler and they're cheaper.
also explosions dosnt set things on fire lol ,buildings dont combust because of dynamite or c4 explosions ,its more of a shock based explosion than a petrol based one
I tried to burn some (25ml) diesel in a crucible as a disposal method since you're not allowed to pour it in the waste or down a drain and my car is petrol. Bunsen burner blue flame on the top for 15 seconds did not ignite it. Vodka ignites more easily. I had to heat it underneath for 20 seconds or so until it started to fume, them heat the to which caught fire. Pulled the flame away and the diesel fire went out. So added heat to the top again for another 10-15 seconds. Finally it was able to self sustain. I know it's because there oxygen supply wasn't good since it's in a small metal cup, but still surprising. It did burn for about an hour though, which vodka does not. Also unhappy that it left a thick black sludge to dispose of. Currently planning on adding it to roofing tar.
Probably propane in most cases, and not really a detonation. Just a large accumulation of propane set on fire to create a huge fireball. From what I've seen of grenades, mines and such they produce no fireball at all. Gasoline would produce a thick black smoke almost immediately, and would probably be illegal due to the pollution factor.
The Dark Knight explosion was actually real though. The scene where the explosion stops and Joker starts to fiddle with the button, then he flinches as the explosions start up again, was actually improvised. Something went wrong with the explosion sequence so that's actually Heath Ledger flinching IRL at an exploding building that 20 ft away.
Just because it was a real explosion doesn't mean it was a realistic explosion. Real explosives do not produce giant fireballs like you see in movies. You have to add a bunch of, well, essentially fireworks to the mix.
@@MrRizeAG They add propane to the mix to allow for those effects. typically it's propane canons. In that case I think it was just canisters that were meant for the effect and wouldn't be lost in the building they demolished for the scene.
That whole scene was planned though. That theory has been debunked, they waited so everybody on set could move away since the explosion was gonna be real
No, they're funnier so they get a higher score. It didn't make much sense. At least in the comedies they acknowledge the ridiculousness of movie explosions.
@@sackarsch6572 I'm saying they're more realistic precisely because of the point of those comedies is to point out how absurd explosions in hollywood movies are, that's what comedy is, pointing out the absurd.
Yea I'm with Agent 47, like Lonely Island even made a song making fun of the way explosions are shown in movies (you can look it up on TH-cam: "cool guys don't look at explosions")
0:16 Desperado 1:46 Dejango 2:50 Indiana Jones: Kingdom of the Crystal Skull 4:18 Transfomers 6:15 X-Men 7:25 Hancock 8:33 The Equalizer 10:04 Dark Knight 11:05 21 Jump Street (most realistic) 12:18 The Other Guys What about the Hurt Locker?!
I have no faith in humanity if you can’t even navigate the basic elements of the plot in “the Last Crusade” it’s not complicated. Go watch the movie again. Sr. was healed from his wounds in the temple. After he crossed the seal (warned by the knight) the eternal life is no longer possible. Since Henry senior (Sean Connery) was clearly healed from his wounds he just becomes a normal healthy man walking out of the tomb. You are not under divine protection when you don’t follow the simple rules the movie stated. Thus they are both mortal again. Any subsequent injury could be fatal. Go read a book.
@@douganderson7002 First, you think Michael Bay's ego would let him consult anyone about toning things down or making them realistic? And two, I dunno, Mythbusters had no issues making fun explosions. Or making things disappear.
@@douganderson7002 What do you mean it would be unsafe.. CGI? They way you say that makes it sound like all those unrealistic explosions weren't done in CGI.
Yeah. He also mentioned that it would be expensive and Joker wouldnt be able to get the explosives. I guess he forgot that Joker robbed the bank at the beginning of the film...
He should be rating the explosions, not the logistics of surviving a nuclear blast in a fridge or whether you would be identified by hospital staff with all your face paint.
"This is one of my favorite movies" *Has a scene with him burning money Has a seen with him robbing a bank with like 13 helpers* "He would need a lot of money and a lot of time, he couldn't do it dressed like that" Bro, if it's your favorite movie you'd know he has the resources you claim he doesn't.
You gave transformers a 4.5 out of 10, but the nuclear blast from Indiana Jones a 1 out of 10 really. Besides the whole fridge bit it was quite realistic.
Joker had tonnes of corrupt people working for him as seen through out the movie. The movie never implies he personally put every charge in the hospital. Same is the case with the charges put in the ferries.
The Dark Knight scene is real, they actually blew up a old factory. Also the Joker has a lot of followers/henchmen that will plant the explosives for him.
Captain Communism his issue wasn’t that you could rig a hospital for demolition; his issue was that you wouldn’t be able to disguise all the charges so that it went unnoticed by SOMEONE in the hospital.
@@blake60ah41 the hospital was being evacuated. That would make it easy to send some guys in with police/nurse/maintenance uniforms. Also there are O2 tanks on every single floor, usually stockpiled in a single supply room as backups or when transporting patients. Stick a single charge on each sector's O2 tank stockpile as well as on the main O2 tank that feeds the hardlined room O2. Boom
Unfortunately most people suspend their conventional knowledge to create or sustain a reality that is emotionally copabale..... I do suspect thought that he's already fully aware that planes cannot bring down buildings and that the THREE 911 towers were not only classic, but expertly engineered controlled demolitions..... If me, as a regular degular software engineer was able to price this together with my limited college level physics understanding, then someone who specializes in things blowing up of course is able to preace this together
@moo So you're attacking a digital representation of a person you don't know rather than the ideology that person was proposing..... I don't expect you to see how this makes you look incapable of defending your position with actual substance.... Assuming you have a position.... To which I'd like to ask, what's your thought son 9/11?
The Joker part... Joker has henchmen everywhere, it is likely he had people planting the explosives in the hospital before causing them to be evacuated.
This video is a bit disappointing - he spends far more time critiquing the set-up of these explosions rather than the actual explosion itself. Take The Dark Knight as an example - did the explosion look appropriate for the purported charges/source? Did it sound right? Was it over the top or just right? These are the questions I wanted answers to, not whether The Joker had the time or money to rig up the hospital.
the reason why he's critiquing Joker's setup for the rig is because there simply isn't anything he can critique about the explosions, it was done just right, and perfect. People just need to find someting to critique, and he only assumed Joker did it ALL by himself, which the film never clarified, but it does give us an idea that Joker has a bunch of crazy psychotic followers he manipulate to help him do his deeds. So this "expert" is just forcing the critique on that one.
@@kvltizt Not really, mostly because it was an actual explosion. They really blew up a hospital for filming, and it almost went wrong (i recomend looking it up, it really shows the effort and talent that went into that movie) There was too much fire for it to be standard demolition explosives you'd usually see used on buildings like this, but its the joker, not a construction worker. If i recall correctly they used a combination of remote charges and gasoline to create a realistic but aesthetically pleasing explosion, which wouldn't be unreasonable for the joker (he's constantly shown working with gasoline like in the boat scene, which pretty much confirms that) sorry for my English btw
It would be cool to have these experts critique movie scenes and then bring one scene themselves that they think if the best in terms of being realistic
Didn't Django blow out the natural gas lanterns and turn the knobs all the way up before the dynamite? Because that's what I thought caused the whole house to explode was the explosion travelling through the lines in the house.
it would only explain the flames but not the explosion managing to demolish the whole building, but as he said he could have had more explosives hooked somewhere else...
A house filled with the right mix of natural gas and regular air can totally explode from the rapid combustion / expansion. Also, a flame cannot travel through a gas line because there's no oxygen in there.
Those lanterns aren't natural gas, they're oil or kerosene. You could get a fireball with kerosene, but there's nowhere near enough oil in those lamps to create such a large fireball.
Also, after the Dark Knight Rises, I assumed that this was the prototype for the concrete laced with explosives and had been constructed with the explosives in place all along. Seems like the typical long playing game the Joke would run or at least try and hijack from the league of assassins.
cash and look like somewhat normal beings would not help you too much. Workers of that hospital would notice that you are not one of them and u instaling some strange stuff in hospital and that is not some public place where u can leave what ever u want(and you would need "good amount" of explosives to destroy whole building with explosives if u not instaling them inside walls or pillars that have holes drilled specialy for that and you need "good amount" of time to do that...).
@@Bialy_1 given this is Gotham, you're forgetting how easily bribable most of the people are. most of the police force can not even be trusted. he had the crew to do it, money to bribe for extra measure. factor in once again that most of the hospitals were already being evacuated. he only had to target the one hospital, and more than half the crew easily could have been on the payroll with no real affect to their conscience knowing they were also moving people OUT of the hospital, so they wouldn't feel too bad about it blowing up.
about the only realistic depiction I can think of was in "sum of all fears", esp. regarding time delay between the flash and shock front arrival, in that hospital building.
A Shaolin master react to for honor wu lin faction check A explosive expert react to CGI explotion check A ex Yakuza member play Yakuza check A ex criminal robber play GTA check Now we need real goat to react to goat simulator and real miner react to minecraft
Bumblebee explosion with John Cena blowing up a door when Bumblebee got revived is probably gonna be 10/10. Dude’s arm was broken, both of the characters couldn’t breathe, were winded, took forever to get up, got bruised and scratched, etc., seemed to me the most realistic explosion in a movie.
@@MrTeddy12397 And? The collapse was never pinned on 'melted steel beams'. Steel weakens severely at temps well below its melting point, which jet fuel can easily reach. Like I said: people can't be bothered to fact check conspiracy theories.
@@Darkojin1 Ok, checked it, both holds the record for different categories. T2 holds for biggest explosion with actual actors close to it and Spectre holds the record for "largest film stunt explosion".
KYXER The Hurt Locker did have some of the most realistic explosions in Hollywood. However, it is also laughably inaccurate in terms of how it portrays the activities of EOD personnel and military operations in Iraq in general.
Whenever I watch these videos about experts reviewing things, I think about how much I hate my high school councilor for not telling me things like I could work with explosives for a living.
Dang, I wish he'd talked about the explosion from the first scene in 'Children of Men'. I don't know if it's "more realistic", but there are no flames or flying people...just a sudden, deafening sound with a intense shock-wave and horrible destruction.
Dude totally misses the fact that, in the Desperado scene, when Antonio Banderas drops the pair of grenades over the edge of the roof, the spoons never spring up or detach from the fuse.
A billion dollars it was probably more like 4 or 5 billion My main problem with that was he's giving his opinion on the ability of Heath Ledger's Joker to place explosives his only opinion that holds weight is whether or not the explosion could happen like that I'm saying I don't think blah blah blah is useless what he should have said is they actually good practical effects for that scene and blew up an actual Hospital 10/10
Anton Ivanov also the fact that not all of the explosives went off and the joker was like “that was lame” was unscripted. they were all supposed to detonate in succession, so heath ledger just kinda went with the flow and they filmed that
yeah i figured with all the money he had the purchase was easy, and all the dudes he recruited they would have had the manpower to place 50 explosives within an hour
@@Hazel-xl8in This is actually a myth. There's behind the scenes footage where Christopher Nolan talks about how they needed a pause in the explosions so Ledger had enough time to walk to safety
This is interesting. I'd like to add a couple of critiques that he overlooked: 0:15 Desperado - Grenades don't make fireballs. Fragmentation grenades are meant to burst and send shrapnel in every direction. It's not meant to cause thermal damage; it's more like firing omnidirectional bullets. You'd get a pressure wave from the blast, and it would kick up a lot of dirt, but there would be no fire. This trope is super common in media, but there was an episode of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia where they lampshade it by trying to blow up a car with a grenade. 7:25 Hancock - I'm not certain what kind of grenade that is, but I have experience with similar 40 MM grenades. Presuming that the mechanics are the same, the way that those work is that they're fired from what's essentially a bulky gun. The launcher is rifled, and so the grenade will rotate in the air just like a large bullet. Inside the grenade, the centrifugal force of that rotation will cause a mechanism to move outwards and arm the grenade. A certain amount of force (i.e. rate of spinning across time) is required for the grenade to become armed, meaning as a safety precaution, the grenade actually won't blow up unless it travels a minimum distance that allows it to arm - usually about 40 metres, but it can vary. Under that distance, it'd still be enough to kill someone if there's a direct hit, as it's essentially a giant bone-crushing bullet. For Hancock, I think it'd be likely that the grenade would either blow up when he smacked it, or wouldn't blow up at all. Still, it's plausible that he was in that sweet spot of being below the minimum arming distance, but the police car was not. If that were the case, it would still be like the fragmentation grenade above, and not cause that kind of fireball. Source: Personal experience. I was a Canadian infantryman and often carried an M203.
@@ramenlyyold2383 That sub's for people who claim to be very smart without ever backing it up. This is a case of someone sharing actual experience and knowledge. Quit trying to sound cool while using a subreddit incorrectly.
MAN, forgetabout unrealistic explosions... my beef is sound effects... I seen a movie when a car peeled rubber while going through GRASS... or a car screeching it's tires on wet pavement... or dirt... come on man... !!!
It's called foley - and although sometimes rediculous it can really add to a scene - i think terminator is the best example sarah connor is running away from arnie, and you here her heels on the concrete floor but she isn;t wearing heels - it just adds to the tension in the scene.
Your beef is sound effects!? Where do you buy that? Is it vegan? This post brought to you by DadJokes. “DadJokes- you can still be corny if ya don’t like corn.” That post brought to you by CornJokes. “CornJokes- Is your brain a MAIZE of dad jokes?” .... I’ll leave now.
I hate when someone is obviously being stealthy and someone dubs in loud footstep noises. The dub guys see footsteps, they dub crunchy footstep noises even if it's ninja walking on a rubber mattress.
The explosion in the Indiana jones movie is 100% accurate. If you watch the nuke test videos they are almost identical. But yeah a fridge won't save you. However that's the premise of the movie.. Indiana jones is a legend.
I was amazed they showed things like the abundance of orange and brown light and paint combusting and turning to ash off the sides of buildings blown by heat-generated wind before they were blown over by the blast itself. It's just like that video of the testing of that huge artillery piece America made with an atomic shell for use in WW3 in Central Europe. (cutting off valleys to prevent Soviet advance in key areas.) They set up a schoolbus with a camera pointed at it. The paint or metal of it turned to dust and radiated off it when the flash shone on it. It probably would have bleached its shadow on pavement if there were any.
The grenade scene from Hancock is actually possible. The weapon is a M32MGL Grenade Luncher. The M32 in this case is firing either a High explosive or High explosive dual purpose 40mm grenade. These grenades are essentially large explosive bullets. The grenade detonates on impact. To prevent the grenade from detonating before it is fired it has a safety fuse that is armed by the grenade spinning. The centrifugal force imparted on the round only effects the grenade beyond a certain range to protect the firer. This range is usually 14-38m beyond the muzzle of the weapon. The round flying at several hundred feet per second can in fact ricochet off of something without detonating, and then detonate when it re impacts something that is beyond its arming distance. I have personally witnessed this. Edit: as several people have mentioned, yes the explosion is not realistic. It is clearly a gas explosion made for the movie. A real HE/HEDP round hitting the front of an SUV like that would destroy the front, and create some smoke and dust, but mostly throw fragments and pressure around. Obviously these are invisible.
Sounds very plausible, also it didn't look like Hancock hit it frontally either, but more off to the side, at an angle, which if you think about tank armor and angling, it is definitely possible to ricochet it. Especially if it is within the safety range, as you mentioned.
Clownman He can’t have eternal life without staying within the bounds of the great seal. His wounds were healed, but once he left he gave up immortality.
The hospital explosion in the dark knight actually happened! there's no cgi in that, so in terms of realistic explosion it's a 10/10, because it is real! the guy just commented on the story: him placing the bombs and the budget needed to have that happening. In the movie joker had robbed millions so budget wouldn't be a problem. And the bomb placing: it isn't shown or mentioned in the movie that it was him directly placing them nor when he (or whoever) placed them, so it would be possible
@@dobson. sure but those are details, Nolan never does gci for big things like these. He actually built a lot of complicated sets for specific scenes in some movies like inception interstellar and so on. Not to mention Dunkirk where almost everything was real
Why do people seem to think this video is about CGI explosions looking real? Most of the explosions in the video are real, it's about whether or not they make sense in the given circumstances
I also an explosives engineer I would add the shrapnel not killing them in almost every scene along with the concussions they would likely have is the main thing and grenades having a secondary pin that must be pulled as well. The M203 40mm would not get deflected for the same reason it exploded when it hit the car.
1. not all grenades have secondary pins, tbh i have never heard of secondary pins at all 2. the grenade could be deflected, just like any round, but you would be correct in this scene the angle was far too low
Yeah, I'm surprised he didn't mention the levers not flying off the thrown grenades. The lever has to fall off for the striker to start the timed reaction/fuse. The grenade in Hancock could, in theory, be deflected if he struck it from the side, but he clearly hit it on the nose, which would set it off. I wonder what would have happened if he'd grabbed from the back. Would the sudden stopping trigger the explosive or cause the grenade to fall apart and just set off the detonator but not the main charge?
@@evilsharkey8954 I agree with the levers on the hand grenades because thats the 3rd and final safety on a hand grenade. And no @Captain Patches Trapped in Patches, Standard hand grenades used in the U.S. Army have 3 safeties, of which 2 are pins. "Push, pull, throw" Push out the grasping pin, pull out the cliche pin everyone thinks about, and throw. The lever is a safety as long as its depressed. Adding onto that for @Case White if you're not military savvy you won't know this, but 40mm has a rotational trigger amount for it to properly detonate that no one ever hears about or knows about. I think it's something like 20 rotations or maybe I'm thinking it has to travel 20 feet I cannot recall as I was never a grenadier in the army, but I digress. In theory it could hit his hand below the rotational trigger amount and finish off the rotations and detonate past the impact of his hand. Again, HIGHLY unlikely but not improbable.
The raiting don't make sence: #1:"there is everything wrong about granates" = 2/10 Stars #3:"realistic light, realistic damage, whole nuclear explosion is pictured correct but he survive the flight" = 1/10 Stars ....wtf
enlightened_GK ikr?! And then the chickens exploding got like 7 stars wtf. No matter how much you hated Indiana and the flying fridge, the nuclear explosion itself was realistic.
@@macleunin I think it was more to do with the fact that somethings didn't explode that you'd expect to (ie the tanker) he even says that the exploding chickens is a bit of a gag so thats probably why it got knocked off three stars
ok, you survive a nuclear blast in a fridge with a thin lead lining, that gets catapulted what I can only assume is several kilometres, and casually walk away like its no big deal, and tell us about it.
In an episode of 99% invisible, you learn that you COULD survive a nuclear bomb like Hiroshima and Nagasaki even if you are not that far. With the modern nuclear arsenal, it's a whole different story. 99percentinvisible.org/episode/atomic-tattoos/
Just wanted to point out that Indiana Jones drank from Holy Grail. He's already going to live for a few thousand years, if not longer. A little, or even a lot, of radiation won't affect him very much, and if anything it would probably just shave off a few hundred years of his limited immortality. You can talk about science all you want, but in that one particular case, lore wise he is protected in ways that the viewers don't fully know.
@@karlhiscock92 That's the glory of a public forum. When a few thousand minds come together, we can discover things together that one person typically can't do alone.
@@chasebarber10 Let's not forget it's just a movie; I doubt they're going to blow a few thousand on R&D just to validate the 1% of people who question the real world application of nukes vs a fridge.
Yeah, there's literally a scene in the movie where there's an entire room filled with cash and the Joker sets fire to it. I don't think he's exactly short on money lol
@@roemip well the point of that scene was that he burned it all... he didn't need it because all the things he wants are cheap, like gasoline and bullets to cause mayhem. But to blow up the hospital the way he did would require a lot of money; high tech equipment and expertise, a lot of time to set up, and hundreds of pounds of explosives. It's impossible that he did it in the way that he did without everyone noticing.
@@83917Michael it is possible, he controls a good bit of the mob and the mob is everywhere in Gotham he could've had dozens of thugs helping him. Plus he has any resource he needs money, knowledge, manpower, and insanit.
Most unrealistic thing about the Joker in my opinion is his goons. Like in real life if you had a trillion $ you are just going to find all these dudes that are cool with brazen murders and their own expendability? A show like the WIre would be a realistic take. Boss with all the $ tells his enforcer to take out a politician. The enforcer refuses saying they aren't assassins of civilians, keeping in mind this dude has already murdered 20+ people including his own.
he should have seen the scene in narcos mexico when rafa throws the grades in to the hole they were digging and found the water. that scene had something special in it.
I want to see a 10/10 realistic one.
Hi shout me out please
Wtc7 on 9/11
Go to war zone
Now I understand my recommendations , they're based on your likings. Amazing !
Mythbusters ANFO truck, there one second gone the next.
Which explains why they used tubs of gasoline in movies instead, that is the only way you get to see anything.
So real explosions are:
- Short
- Loud crack
- Fireball that's about 30% larger than explosive but lasts like half a second.
- Shock wave doesn't throw you, instead basically knocks you down.
- Shock wave will likely rupture your lungs.
- Ears and Lungs are affected most
- If you blow up a house fireballs will be about 1-2 seconds long. There will be small fires around.
- Most dangerous thing is fragmentation that will practically blend you.
Notes:
- Shooting a gas tank will not make it explode
- Pulling a pin with your teeth will basically be very awkward and embarrassing because it's very tough. May break your teeth.
Some body not only will pulling the pin make you look like a dumbass you’ll break your teeth
He said you wouldn´t be able to pull the pin with your teeth. You would NOT pull the pin, ONLY break your teeth. It could be right. When you see actual footage of people using grenades, they do really jank very hard on the pin.
Used grenades. If you attempt to pull pin with teeth, those teeth go away forever and you still have an unarmed grenade.
It should be noted that what exactly happens with an explosion differs depending on a number of variables.
"So real explosions are:
"
"- Short
"
Instant. Not short. Instant.
"- Loud crack
"
Yes.
"- Fireball that's about 30% larger than explosive but lasts like half a second."
No, an instant shockwave and then all you see is the smoke. The fireball is too fast to see except occasionally.
"- Shock wave doesn't throw you, instead basically knocks you down."
No, it turns your body into a bunch of unrecognizable pieces that simply fall down.
"- Shock wave will likely rupture your lungs.
"
If it doesn't instantly kill you... Which it most likely will...
"- Ears and Lungs are affected most
"
And the rest of your body which is turned into... I don't even know... A bunch of pieces...
"- If you blow up a house fireballs will be about 1-2 seconds long. There will be small fires around.
"
If it's Gasoline then it will just burn down very quick. If you are talking about HE then no, the house will instantly shatter into a billion pieces. There won't be a fireball. Just smoke and fragments everywhere.
"- Most dangerous thing is fragmentation that will practically blend you."
True.
Notes:
"- Shooting a gas tank will not make it explode
"
True,
Next video: Serial killer rates unrealistic horror movies. (and gets mad)
lol
yes please
Focus on get mad
I would pay to see that
wheres ted bundy when you need him
He should at least note that the explosion in Dark Knight was a real demolition of a real building in Chicago
True but he only went over the setup stage. He probably didnt go over that part since it was real, no need to tweak perfection.
Also he assumed joker was the one that planted the bombs, but he does have a crew and it’s not like joker does busy work
That's probably how it got 6/10
@@itsthatbrownboiilite5699 Also the Joker has *plenty* of money. Has this guy not seen the film?
@@fakecubed yeah I felt he spoke from the overall plot perspective and not just the ' explosion ' scene, which he should have done
Next: Ghost rates unrealistic paranormal activity in films.
Have you heard the tragedy of Darth Plagueis the you?
@@biggest_mac5060 Yes, but it is not a story the Jedi would tell.
"No no no, we ghosts don't do that"
That's DEMONIC Hell Spons, not us Spooks
And having our name known by people won't get us being exorcised. We don't have anything to do with god,we are already dead so he won't do anything to us at all,he can only have influence on living entities,not us
*_Michael Bay wants to know your location_*
and he's gonna kill you with an unrealistic bomb
@@aditnitu lol
Hes gonna make u watch all transformers saga in loop lol
@@aditnitu lol he has one of the best special effects
@@Beraksekebon21 plesse do anytime the transformers movie saga never gets old
Father: What do you dream to be?
Son 1: A teacher!
Son 2: Painter...
Son 3: Explosives Engineer.
The 3rd one would likely make more money than the rest
And for sure his job will never get old 😅
I’m getting my degree in that it’s actually really fun
@@kyliebell100 I am annoyed no one ever told me this was a thing when I was a kid.
Redstone engineer
@@kyliebell100 Degrees in this kinda field actually exist????? Very interesting indeed
Love when the experts analyze impossible things "He regenerates, so I guess you could walk away from this?"
It's only impossible in our own universe, but judging things based on the internal consistency and internal rules and logic of a piece of fiction makes a lot of sense. It just depends on which parts they telegraph as being "not like logic in our world". There's no real reason why explosions would work any differently in, say, X-men, but they do make clear that the way Wolverine works isn't like in our world, i.e. he regenerates. So then it's a matter of taking that internal logic into account.
@@MerelvandenHurk Thanks for explaining what fiction is
@@Sunprism No need to get patronizing.
@Katora Khan I'm not uptight. Stop shutting down people like that. If we can't hold a conversation without being patronizing and calling people uptight, we're not gonna get anywhere. If someone is being patronizing to me, I'm allowed to speak out against it. But instead you're blaming me? That's just backwards.
You better NOT even try to figure out logic and physics in *Bollywood* movies. 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂
Loool
That fighting scene at the end of Main hoon na.... SRK falls, then the villain walks around him (in real time while SRK is still falling very slowly) and punches him all while SRK is in the air falling in “slow motion”.
Specially south Indian movies
😂😂some south indian movies broke physics.....
You'd expect it to be more realistic since almost all Bollywood movies use 0% CGI.
I love how comedies are that making fun how Hollywood portrays explosions, are also the most accurate.
Yeah in a way to make fun of unrealistic movie actions
The most ridiculous thing about this is trying to blow up a fuel tank on a moving truck. Dude, what did the truck driver ever do to you? He is just trying to make a living.
There is endless 4th wall breaking material for anyone who wants to point out how dumb most movies are if you bring in enough experts. It is not just explosions, military gargin, or how people actually do their jobs, but what plants/animals you see/hear for a specific region of the world.
For Transformers, the people aboard the aircraft are the real crew usually manning it, and he just told them what the end result had to be and let them do the talking as they would in real life.
That's why the radio traffic is VERY accurate.
Yeah Bay has a great relationship with the DoD and he's never been turned down when asking for Military Aid in making his films. The Pentagon views them as recruitment ads.
Yea its promotion to the world. As funny as it sounds it's actually true and not an assumption
1.5/10
So what I'm getting here is that comedies are the most realistic movies.
Could be the reason why im a bigger fan of comedy than over budgeted hollywood crap.
they always have been. even scrubs, which isn’t the most accurate medically, gets the realities of being a medical intern a lot more right than shows like gray’s anatomy
@@andysmith5464 Runway in FF6>Europe
It would have been hilarious if Indiana Jones had just slowly fallen apart over the two hours of the movie from acute radiation sickness.
The whole point of the 21 Jump Street scene is to make fun of explosions in action scenes...
Imagine how cool it gotta to be having “Explosive Engineer“ in your work resume
@Councilman Les Wynan I disagree. A lot of infrastructure work uses controlled detonations. I mean not all the the time but I've never seen an "Explosives Engineer" major at any universities, so there's not a lot of people to call either I'd imagine. And you can probably do contract work with the military or maybe he is in the military.
If I could only go back in time and tell my younger self that there's such a thing as an Explosive Engineer.
Or anything other than unemployed
eh, i was en explosives expert in the Corps and its done nothing for me in the civilian sector save for having cool stories to tell at parties.
@@IAN0351 what kind of explosives expert?
11:56 "chickens don't explode" (paraphrased)
Black from Angry Birds: hold my beer
^ Underrated comment
Billy Wong um, his name is Bomb? have some more respect for deities, please
it s a nitrochicken
@@prohateenemy1543 bird that can say the n-word
Damn, I didn't know Clark Kent was an explosives expert.
yeah he place the bomb , he itself inform it , and he was ready to rescue .
Uh no, he looks more like an adult Tom Holland.
"Totally unrealistic. Couldn't happen."
6.5/10
Can you please tell me the name of the anime in your profile picture?
It's Non Non Biyori ^^
Thanks a lot :D
Ign intensifies*
Hey....he meant the explosions were almost real, but practically placing those explosives for blowing up the building that way may have been difficult.....so just considering the explosions it should be 6.5 atleast
Aliens react to alien movies
Yeah they should get Elon to react to AI movies
@@ElephantJuice001
Law #235 of the internet: any conversation thread will at some point involve Ol' Musky and his bullshit ideas.
"Look at this guy, he has pointy ears and a silly haircut. None of us looks like this! Completely ridiculous!"
Zuckerberg wants to know your location
Si señor, Ellen Ripley got memed
On the Indiana Jones fridge scene:
"I award no points and may got have mercy on your soul"
I was just quoting that scene the other day 🤣
Okay, A simple wrong would’ve done just fine....
@@suskaswallows lol😂
video click bait he judgeing explosions not if the person would live the bomb was right
that one was bs it should've been a 4/10 at least
Imagine telling your grandkids that you survived a nuke by hiding in a fridge
lmao your profile pic
Imagine telling them that hiding under a wooden desk was supposed to have worked.
Ben Danklen Fallout??
@@peterinbrat Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't that only in case the bomb was close enough to shatter the windows, but not actually incinerate you? The shockwave from a nuke goes quite a distance.
CAM_ Clan Indiana Jones
I was an assaultman in the Marines (explosives, rockets, and breaching specialist) and my fiancee hates watching action movies with me because so many of the explosions are laughably exaggerated and unrealistic and I constantly point it out lol
Yah sure and I'm the commander of the USA
@@brandonbosworth1829 it's that hard to believe he's a marine? He didn't claim that he's a SEAL/Doctor/Astronaut like Mr. Johnny Kim
@@tomnguyen8546 I know someone that can top Johnny Kim..... Johnny Sin
0/10 not enough back burns
Hi
A man of exquisite culture I see
I'm the 3rd comment in a Justin Y comment. There is a god😢
Ouo
*4 comments* Umm, guys? Our god is here, give some respect!
*How many people out there can say that they're an Explosive Expert*
What a Badass title.
you would be suprised actually. There are a lot of people in this line of work. Construction business, mining, tunneling, law enforcement and military, materials testing, chemistry departments, gun ranges, movie and effect specialists, fireworks people, etc etc.
Ted Kaczynski could've
One day I want to be expert enough to be featured in one of these videos :)
Eh...I mean, I probably have more experience in explosives than this dude, and probably about the same understanding.
I'm pretty sure he's just a college student who will most likely drop out or change subject next year but they brought him in and called him an expert for purpose of the video.
"Cool guys don't look at explosions"
For risk of losing an eye.
Jacob Staten th-cam.com/video/Sqz5dbs5zmo/w-d-xo.html
''They bore me now.''
Was looking for this comment.
Except for Indiana Jones
Hey he didn’t rate the explosion in Indiana Jones he just rated Indy’s survivability! That explosion was a 10!
Yeah, the explosion itself was clearly inspired by real nuclear test footage making it one of the most realistic nukes in movies ever.
That's an awesome point my friend.
nice Bakuretsu!
Miffed Max thank you! Finally someone says that!
I think he doesn't just rate the explosion per se but also its effects on the persons and things in the scene..
One thing he didn't mention is that all these explosions seem to be gasoline/petrol based. Gas explosions tend to look bigger and scarier because of that immense fireball they create, but they really aren't that dangerous to structures. Explosions created by dynamite like in Django Unchained or demolition charges like in The Dark Knight don't create that fireball, and military carpet bombs like in Transformers DEFINITELY don't. Movies just use those sort of gasoline explosions because they look cooler and they're cheaper.
also explosions dosnt set things on fire lol ,buildings dont combust because of dynamite or c4 explosions ,its more of a shock based explosion than a petrol based one
I tried to burn some (25ml) diesel in a crucible as a disposal method since you're not allowed to pour it in the waste or down a drain and my car is petrol.
Bunsen burner blue flame on the top for 15 seconds did not ignite it.
Vodka ignites more easily.
I had to heat it underneath for 20 seconds or so until it started to fume, them heat the to which caught fire. Pulled the flame away and the diesel fire went out.
So added heat to the top again for another 10-15 seconds. Finally it was able to self sustain. I know it's because there oxygen supply wasn't good since it's in a small metal cup, but still surprising.
It did burn for about an hour though, which vodka does not.
Also unhappy that it left a thick black sludge to dispose of.
Currently planning on adding it to roofing tar.
@@markp8295 Drink it next time
Unless those are napalm..
Probably propane in most cases, and not really a detonation. Just a large accumulation of propane set on fire to create a huge fireball. From what I've seen of grenades, mines and such they produce no fireball at all. Gasoline would produce a thick black smoke almost immediately, and would probably be illegal due to the pollution factor.
This man ruined my dream of surviving a nuclear test in a fridge
WHY DON'T YOU JUST GET IN AN AIRTIGHT FRIDGE AND WAIT?
So he saved ur life lol
I hope they try this on Myth Buster's one day.
Jigga Boo I was 2 months old when that movie came out
@Jigga Boo yeah but the explosion it self isnt unrealistic so the fact that it just got 1 star is confusing me
Imagine having this guy watch Michael Bay movies with you.
I will hate my life
I would rather listen to this guy speak than watch a movie Michael Bay directed.
"Pfff, Fake af" "What?, Impossible!" "Faker than your girlfriend"
He's probably a chill dude outside the context of this video.
Imagine watching a Michael Bay movie.
The Dark Knight explosion was actually real though. The scene where the explosion stops and Joker starts to fiddle with the button, then he flinches as the explosions start up again, was actually improvised. Something went wrong with the explosion sequence so that's actually Heath Ledger flinching IRL at an exploding building that 20 ft away.
Just because it was a real explosion doesn't mean it was a realistic explosion. Real explosives do not produce giant fireballs like you see in movies. You have to add a bunch of, well, essentially fireworks to the mix.
@@MrRizeAG They add propane to the mix to allow for those effects. typically it's propane canons. In that case I think it was just canisters that were meant for the effect and wouldn't be lost in the building they demolished for the scene.
The expert never said the explosion was unrealistic, he just said that it would be extremely expensive and would require a lot of time
Urban myth. The second delayed explosion was even in the script and story board.
That whole scene was planned though. That theory has been debunked, they waited so everybody on set could move away since the explosion was gonna be real
So the comedies are more realistic.
No, they're funnier so they get a higher score. It didn't make much sense. At least in the comedies they acknowledge the ridiculousness of movie explosions.
Being comedies is the exact reason they're more realistic
No. Some Comedies are more realistic. There also realistic action movies. Those without explosions.
@@sackarsch6572 I'm saying they're more realistic precisely because of the point of those comedies is to point out how absurd explosions in hollywood movies are, that's what comedy is, pointing out the absurd.
@@BIadelores I wasnt reacting to you. But with those comedies here im completly with you.
I love how the comedies were the most accurate 😂
Probably because they don't have the budget to exaggerate the effects. :)
@@edwardv1255 nah, its cuz they make fun of stuff.
And frankly explosions being so unrealistic in movies is a good topic to implement
Yea I'm with Agent 47, like Lonely Island even made a song making fun of the way explosions are shown in movies (you can look it up on TH-cam: "cool guys don't look at explosions")
idk what's more interesting, the actual informations or how cute that explosives expert is
Whai ar yo gay?
Oh my god right, gay people actually exist???
D I S G U S T A NG ! ! !
Your gay
Yaaassssssssssss, explosives daddy explains the movie tea
0:16 Desperado
1:46 Dejango
2:50 Indiana Jones: Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
4:18 Transfomers
6:15 X-Men
7:25 Hancock
8:33 The Equalizer
10:04 Dark Knight
11:05 21 Jump Street (most realistic)
12:18 The Other Guys
What about the Hurt Locker?!
Old school movie. Blown away.
Dejango!
Or Children of Men. Opening scene has an incredibly realistic portrayal of an terroristic bombing.
The highest score was the one where the chickens exploded.
Dangerous feathery f******!
Maybe they were force-fed gunpowder and sawdust?
Or maybe its just the gass tank of the truck
Guys, every child know that chickens DO explode. It's the fourth law of thermodynamics.
@@hieronymusnervig8712 As a guy that deals with chickens, I conclude this to be true.
He looks like an older Tom Holland.
More like Tom Holland AND Tobey Maguire
JD Bond i seen a shaved Jackman
I see Elijah Wood auditioning for Harry Potter
Does that mean Spiderman will start feeling better?
But foreal though, he should play his dad in the movie (the dead dad)
Tom Holland x Hugh Jackman at least In the thumbnail
Indiana Jones doesn’t die of radiation sickness because he drank from the Holy grail.
Damien333 Good job on pointing it out. I, and seemingly many people, had kind of forgotten!
Except; and also stated in the movie by the Knight guarding the grail: The magic of The holy Grail only works IF you stay guarding The Holy Grail.
Christian Münster so, if what you’re saying is true, Henry Jones should have died of the gunshot right after he left the tomb, right? But he did not
I have no faith in humanity if you can’t even navigate the basic elements of the plot in “the Last Crusade” it’s not complicated. Go watch the movie again.
Sr. was healed from his wounds in the temple. After he crossed the seal (warned by the knight) the eternal life is no longer possible. Since Henry senior (Sean Connery) was clearly healed from his wounds he just becomes a normal healthy man walking out of the tomb. You are not under divine protection when you don’t follow the simple rules the movie stated. Thus they are both mortal again. Any subsequent injury could be fatal.
Go read a book.
Next: Mark Zuckerburg rates lizard movies
Not cool😂😂😂😂😂💔
Cheech & chong: nice dreams lol
... Zuckerberg* ...
*mark Zuckerberg rates robot movies
This dude should be a consultant for Michael Bay & Marvel
Imagine a move with out unrealistic explosion. They would really suck huh 😁😁
@@douganderson7002 First, you think Michael Bay's ego would let him consult anyone about toning things down or making them realistic? And two, I dunno, Mythbusters had no issues making fun explosions. Or making things disappear.
@@douganderson7002 What do you mean it would be unsafe.. CGI? They way you say that makes it sound like all those unrealistic explosions weren't done in CGI.
Same as watching a space battle without any sound. Realistic yes. Fun? No.
or a consultant for cinemasins
The Joker didn't set those explosives, his men did. The same men who drove that bus away.
Yeah. He also mentioned that it would be expensive and Joker wouldnt be able to get the explosives. I guess he forgot that Joker robbed the bank at the beginning of the film...
Also a little confused on how Indiana Jones was rated 1 star when he praised it fairly well?
Juan I guess he was bothered enough about how unrealistic walking away from a nuclear bomb was that it overrode any realistic elements of the blast.
I think, he made the comments and someone else gave the ratings.
Tanmay Mehta this
This guy must be really fun to watch action films with.
Shaking his head the whole time ,rolling his eyes, showing physical signs of irritation 🤣🤣 finally stalks out of the theater "I call bullshit!"
LOL
He should be rating the explosions, not the logistics of surviving a nuclear blast in a fridge or whether you would be identified by hospital staff with all your face paint.
Haha
They should rename this series “upright squares tell you movies aren’t real.”
Appropriately for a video about explosions, this expert is HOT.
RIGHT? Holy cow he’s hot.
@Maxime Klimenko what?
0:03 Thank me later 😂
Money isnt a problem for Joker...
But sanity is.
Because its not about the moneeyyyy its about sending a message
Nor is having a lot of henchman at his disposal to take care of placement while disguised as the night cleaning crew or something.
Time might be though considering the time frame he has to pull that off
"This is one of my favorite movies"
*Has a scene with him burning money
Has a seen with him robbing a bank with like 13 helpers*
"He would need a lot of money and a lot of time, he couldn't do it dressed like that"
Bro, if it's your favorite movie you'd know he has the resources you claim he doesn't.
Why is Eggsy here and not saving the world?
hahaha!!
Oxfords not brogues
couz he tired with the Kingsman , hahaha
Conclusion: Reality isn't as funny as a movie.
Don't know why you have to include jews for some reason but ok
Why does he look like a mature version of Tom Holland? 😂
Older?
Right?
As soon as I saw the guy, I paused and came here looking for this exact comment lol
Thats all i can see now
Tony Goldwyn 😆😆😆
You gave transformers a 4.5 out of 10, but the nuclear blast from Indiana Jones a 1 out of 10 really. Besides the whole fridge bit it was quite realistic.
sure, especially if you imagine it melting over him from the heat
@@seess8251 the melting point of lead is 621.4°F I really dought it
He flies a fcking kilometer in a fridge what is realistic about it?
@@boriskaraivanov6165 the explosion itself
Yes if there wasn't the fridge bit it would probably be much better
In regard to the joker scene he had 70 million dollars and corrupt people inside. Implied at least.
He burned his 70 million...
Jacky The Jocker yes, but he stole 60 something million in the first 20 minutes. Remember the pencil scene?
Exactly ✌🏻
Joker had tonnes of corrupt people working for him as seen through out the movie. The movie never implies he personally put every charge in the hospital. Same is the case with the charges put in the ferries.
This is the only one that made me second guess as well. If anyone has those kind of resources, it's the Joker.
What about Mr bean painting his house with explosion?
Asking a real question here
That will be 5 stars....
@@shadowronin65 that would be 22.5 stars...
Try mythbusters, i believe they covered that one haha
10/10
The Dark Knight scene is real, they actually blew up a old factory. Also the Joker has a lot of followers/henchmen that will plant the explosives for him.
Captain Communism his issue wasn’t that you could rig a hospital for demolition; his issue was that you wouldn’t be able to disguise all the charges so that it went unnoticed by SOMEONE in the hospital.
Actualllly
I'm sorry but I dont believe this dude at all
@@blake60ah41 the hospital was being evacuated. That would make it easy to send some guys in with police/nurse/maintenance uniforms. Also there are O2 tanks on every single floor, usually stockpiled in a single supply room as backups or when transporting patients. Stick a single charge on each sector's O2 tank stockpile as well as on the main O2 tank that feeds the hardlined room O2. Boom
@@danboom101 cool now i know how to blow up a hospital
if you look closely at 00:40 you can see theres still a guitar in that case lol
MrMelonMonkey lol didn’t even notice. Good eye
Rofl
the guitar is just a cover that hides the guns .
@@rockyrivera6397Ahh no, no it isn't.
The guitar is only there when they open the case the moment it cuts you can se that there is no guitar
Every explosion scene ever has the good guy walking away perfectly fine like a bad-ass while a fireball burns behind them
Yeah... you might want to ask Sam from Transformers about that one.
Thats how I leave the bedroom after sex
@@homefront3162 lmao!! while she writhes and moans in pain and anger and resentment...
What about LaBeouf
@@homefront3162 lmaooo
Perfect man to answer whether 9/11 was an "inside job" or not.
Edit: shit, I'm sorry y'all.
Unfortunately most people suspend their conventional knowledge to create or sustain a reality that is emotionally copabale..... I do suspect thought that he's already fully aware that planes cannot bring down buildings and that the THREE 911 towers were not only classic, but expertly engineered controlled demolitions..... If me, as a regular degular software engineer was able to price this together with my limited college level physics understanding, then someone who specializes in things blowing up of course is able to preace this together
@moo So you're attacking a digital representation of a person you don't know rather than the ideology that person was proposing..... I don't expect you to see how this makes you look incapable of defending your position with actual substance.... Assuming you have a position....
To which I'd like to ask, what's your thought son 9/11?
moo well said
@@Wade_Fucking_Wilson He called me an idiot... You usually say well said in response to evidence based retorts to specific idelogies
leon scott That’s because l agree with him ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
The Joker part... Joker has henchmen everywhere, it is likely he had people planting the explosives in the hospital before causing them to be evacuated.
4:57 you can see the effects over Megan Fox's body lmao
Wow this is bad bad
True lol
Bet they were hoping the titties would distract
This video is a bit disappointing - he spends far more time critiquing the set-up of these explosions rather than the actual explosion itself. Take The Dark Knight as an example - did the explosion look appropriate for the purported charges/source? Did it sound right? Was it over the top or just right? These are the questions I wanted answers to, not whether The Joker had the time or money to rig up the hospital.
This should be the top comment.
the reason why he's critiquing Joker's setup for the rig is because there simply isn't anything he can critique about the explosions, it was done just right, and perfect. People just need to find someting to critique, and he only assumed Joker did it ALL by himself, which the film never clarified, but it does give us an idea that Joker has a bunch of crazy psychotic followers he manipulate to help him do his deeds. So this "expert" is just forcing the critique on that one.
@@Waterbug1591 The fire was over the top.
@@kvltizt Not really, mostly because it was an actual explosion. They really blew up a hospital for filming, and it almost went wrong (i recomend looking it up, it really shows the effort and talent that went into that movie) There was too much fire for it to be standard demolition explosives you'd usually see used on buildings like this, but its the joker, not a construction worker. If i recall correctly they used a combination of remote charges and gasoline to create a realistic but aesthetically pleasing explosion, which wouldn't be unreasonable for the joker (he's constantly shown working with gasoline like in the boat scene, which pretty much confirms that)
sorry for my English btw
@@Honk4frogs I know. It was better than a lit of movie explosions. The hospital was still standing, which was a nice touch.
I bet this guy is fun at parties.....
MD Fish Tanks yikes
Bet he's good at getting the ladies.
@@GreenFalcon926 lol he might be hes pretty cute
he seems like a chill dude
Lol he is paid to do this :)) Isn't his intention tho
It would be cool to have these experts critique movie scenes and then bring one scene themselves that they think if the best in terms of being realistic
He's talking about explosions but we all know he's the hot one here
He looks like Jonathan Tucker 😐
PsinkaJones Ikr! I noticed that during the video and I was like "hot damn!"
Straight dude here, and I noticed.
Ohhh honey you ain't lying
Joe H he looks like a normal 20 something...
Didn't Django blow out the natural gas lanterns and turn the knobs all the way up before the dynamite? Because that's what I thought caused the whole house to explode was the explosion travelling through the lines in the house.
69th like
He probably didn't see the movie and they probably didn't show him that part because that's what I said too
it would only explain the flames but not the explosion managing to demolish the whole building, but as he said he could have had more explosives hooked somewhere else...
A house filled with the right mix of natural gas and regular air can totally explode from the rapid combustion / expansion. Also, a flame cannot travel through a gas line because there's no oxygen in there.
Those lanterns aren't natural gas, they're oil or kerosene. You could get a fireball with kerosene, but there's nowhere near enough oil in those lamps to create such a large fireball.
Joker has a good amount of cash he stole and he has his crew who look like somewhat normal human beings.
Yes, true and the hospital was empty so they would not have to hide the dynamite (or whatever type of explosion stuff it probably was )
Indeed. His points didn't really talk about the explosion itself. But glad to hear that a superhero movie is realistic.
Also, after the Dark Knight Rises, I assumed that this was the prototype for the concrete laced with explosives and had been constructed with the explosives in place all along. Seems like the typical long playing game the Joke would run or at least try and hijack from the league of assassins.
cash and look like somewhat normal beings would not help you too much. Workers of that hospital would notice that you are not one of them and u instaling some strange stuff in hospital and that is not some public place where u can leave what ever u want(and you would need "good amount" of explosives to destroy whole building with explosives if u not instaling them inside walls or pillars that have holes drilled specialy for that and you need "good amount" of time to do that...).
@@Bialy_1 given this is Gotham, you're forgetting how easily bribable most of the people are. most of the police force can not even be trusted. he had the crew to do it, money to bribe for extra measure. factor in once again that most of the hospitals were already being evacuated. he only had to target the one hospital, and more than half the crew easily could have been on the payroll with no real affect to their conscience knowing they were also moving people OUT of the hospital, so they wouldn't feel too bad about it blowing up.
My boy. He's thee Joker, the man can do anything easily. He plans ahead!
He had prep time
*The pilot that dropped nuke on Hiroshima reacts to movie nukes.*
I think he dieded
Paul Tibbets died at age 92 recently
He died in the recent past.
about the only realistic depiction I can think of was in "sum of all fears", esp. regarding time delay between the flash and shock front arrival, in that hospital building.
@@LucidVision138 yes he dieded very deaded
man....who decided that the big explosion while the actor walks away in slow motion was cool? Seriously, let's get rid of that, forever...OK?
Cool guys dont look at explosions
Right? Everyone already knows how ridiculous that is, I think.
@@aaronpierce4443 they blow shit up, and they walk awayyy
Except Iron Man
It works nicely if you're outside the blast radius. But the way these movies show them as just absurd.
Was really hoping he'd have more to say on Dark Knight's scene since it used actual explosives on a real building
Favorite part of that scene was finding out there was an actual unexpected timing issue, and Heath the absolute mad lad played it off perfectly
For dark knight, he literally just criticized the set-up without any comment on the explosion itself.
LITERALLY
The explosion itself wasn't realistic either.
@@gladonos3384 it was
@@gladonos3384 it was real
yeah, that was just stupid. low rating because it was unlikely? okay? unlikely things happen in real life
A Shaolin master react to for honor wu lin faction check
A explosive expert react to CGI explotion check
A ex Yakuza member play Yakuza
check
A ex criminal robber play GTA
check
Now we need real goat to react to goat simulator and real miner react to minecraft
close.
police officer tries GTA.
she did terrible.
A bank robber tries gta heist look it up
Criminal react to Gta is already out there, search it up
I've seen an article about real yakuza members reacting to the game Yakuza 3 so now we need a gta version of that.
@@leftyy_3840 holy shit really damn....
He is Michael Bay's arch nemesis
Based on video games and stuff, I can conclude chickens explode.
Feces are actually explosive...
IEDs are primarily made from animal feces..aka fertilizers
Owen Leatham yay just like in csgo
CS:GO
Bumblebee explosion with John Cena blowing up a door when Bumblebee got revived is probably gonna be 10/10. Dude’s arm was broken, both of the characters couldn’t breathe, were winded, took forever to get up, got bruised and scratched, etc., seemed to me the most realistic explosion in a movie.
Now have him analyze 9/11
Or investigate 3/11
It's been analyzed plenty. Problem is, people don't bother to fact check conspiracy theories.
@@nathanlevesque7812 jet fuel can't melt steel beams
@@nathanlevesque7812 because they are conspiracy theories lol
@@MrTeddy12397 And? The collapse was never pinned on 'melted steel beams'. Steel weakens severely at temps well below its melting point, which jet fuel can easily reach. Like I said: people can't be bothered to fact check conspiracy theories.
The explosion in Transformers 2 holds the Guinness Book of World Records as the biggest bomb ever filmed with actors close to it.
More like BombS in a film
Are you referring to the script or the explosive? ;)
Pretty sure Spectre beat that one.
@@Darkojin1
Nope.
@@Darkojin1
Ok, checked it, both holds the record for different categories. T2 holds for biggest explosion with actual actors close to it and Spectre holds the record for "largest film stunt explosion".
Why didn't he review Hurt Locker??
I miss that one... how not action movies deal with explosions
@@dandalo ikr, and Jeremy Renner is so good in that movie
BleizIt Channel because it's accurate. But I don't really know there are probably some faults somewhere in the movie.
I was really expecting them to
KYXER The Hurt Locker did have some of the most realistic explosions in Hollywood. However, it is also laughably inaccurate in terms of how it portrays the activities of EOD personnel and military operations in Iraq in general.
Whenever I watch these videos about experts reviewing things, I think about how much I hate my high school councilor for not telling me things like I could work with explosives for a living.
Indiana Jones: ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ Rating: 1/10... bruh.
Zripple this Guy is a prick
@E the fridge doesnt have anything to do with the actual explosion
E 🍑
@@monke6774 That isn't how radiation works. You can't just wash it off.
Disliked video because of this.
Dang, I wish he'd talked about the explosion from the first scene in 'Children of Men'. I don't know if it's "more realistic", but there are no flames or flying people...just a sudden, deafening sound with a intense shock-wave and horrible destruction.
That's quite realistic if we're talking about an IED or a frag grenade
Not only an incredible film but very realistic scenes
I'm not gonna lie, this video really blew me away.
Donald Trump go back to building the wall
The best thing you have said. Though, it was hard to pay attention after, "I'm not gonna lie..."
Donald Trump keep up the hard work Mr President 👍👍
Thank you Donald, very cool!
You’re not the real Donald trump but good job on getting that username first👌
Dude totally misses the fact that, in the Desperado scene, when Antonio Banderas drops the pair of grenades over the edge of the roof, the spoons never spring up or detach from the fuse.
10:34 ya know, he also burned a billion dollars in the same movie.....
A billion dollars it was probably more like 4 or 5 billion
My main problem with that was he's giving his opinion on the ability of Heath Ledger's Joker to place explosives his only opinion that holds weight is whether or not the explosion could happen like that I'm saying I don't think blah blah blah is useless what he should have said is they actually good practical effects for that scene and blew up an actual Hospital 10/10
Anton Ivanov also the fact that not all of the explosives went off and the joker was like “that was lame” was unscripted. they were all supposed to detonate in succession, so heath ledger just kinda went with the flow and they filmed that
yeah i figured with all the money he had the purchase was easy, and all the dudes he recruited they would have had the manpower to place 50 explosives within an hour
@@Hazel-xl8in This is actually a myth. There's behind the scenes footage where Christopher Nolan talks about how they needed a pause in the explosions so Ledger had enough time to walk to safety
This is interesting. I'd like to add a couple of critiques that he overlooked:
0:15 Desperado - Grenades don't make fireballs. Fragmentation grenades are meant to burst and send shrapnel in every direction. It's not meant to cause thermal damage; it's more like firing omnidirectional bullets. You'd get a pressure wave from the blast, and it would kick up a lot of dirt, but there would be no fire. This trope is super common in media, but there was an episode of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia where they lampshade it by trying to blow up a car with a grenade.
7:25 Hancock - I'm not certain what kind of grenade that is, but I have experience with similar 40 MM grenades. Presuming that the mechanics are the same, the way that those work is that they're fired from what's essentially a bulky gun. The launcher is rifled, and so the grenade will rotate in the air just like a large bullet. Inside the grenade, the centrifugal force of that rotation will cause a mechanism to move outwards and arm the grenade. A certain amount of force (i.e. rate of spinning across time) is required for the grenade to become armed, meaning as a safety precaution, the grenade actually won't blow up unless it travels a minimum distance that allows it to arm - usually about 40 metres, but it can vary. Under that distance, it'd still be enough to kill someone if there's a direct hit, as it's essentially a giant bone-crushing bullet. For Hancock, I think it'd be likely that the grenade would either blow up when he smacked it, or wouldn't blow up at all. Still, it's plausible that he was in that sweet spot of being below the minimum arming distance, but the police car was not. If that were the case, it would still be like the fragmentation grenade above, and not cause that kind of fireball.
Source: Personal experience. I was a Canadian infantryman and often carried an M203.
_breathes in_
*B O I*
@@ramenlyyold2383 That sub's for people who claim to be very smart without ever backing it up. This is a case of someone sharing actual experience and knowledge.
Quit trying to sound cool while using a subreddit incorrectly.
NoProGaming yeah, you really seem to be lost at this point
@@EddieWBrooks who are you talking about?
@ Oh yeah, I didn't even notice that. They should have sprung off. Good eye!
MAN, forgetabout unrealistic explosions... my beef is sound effects... I seen a movie when a car peeled rubber while going through GRASS... or a car screeching it's tires on wet pavement... or dirt... come on man... !!!
or when movies use M249 sounds when it shows the person firing an M134 mingun >.>
It's called foley - and although sometimes rediculous it can really add to a scene - i think terminator is the best example sarah connor is running away from arnie, and you here her heels on the concrete floor but she isn;t wearing heels - it just adds to the tension in the scene.
Heh, you wanna try being in IT. Pretty much every single thing you have EVER seen on tv or in films that involves a computer is ridiculous.
Your beef is sound effects!? Where do you buy that? Is it vegan?
This post brought to you by DadJokes. “DadJokes- you can still be corny if ya don’t like corn.”
That post brought to you by CornJokes. “CornJokes- Is your brain a MAIZE of dad jokes?”
.... I’ll leave now.
I hate when someone is obviously being stealthy and someone dubs in loud footstep noises. The dub guys see footsteps, they dub crunchy footstep noises even if it's ninja walking on a rubber mattress.
That is the most rating a transformer movie has ever gotten 4.5.
the indiana jones nuke scene might be the most unrealistic but ngl i think it looked the best
If you liked that scene you might want to read the classic book “siege” by James mason
The part where he survived and was thrown clear, yes. The explosion itself, really well done.
The explosion in the Indiana jones movie is 100% accurate. If you watch the nuke test videos they are almost identical. But yeah a fridge won't save you. However that's the premise of the movie.. Indiana jones is a legend.
chimn but they really showed the power of a nuke quite well
I was amazed they showed things like the abundance of orange and brown light and paint combusting and turning to ash off the sides of buildings blown by heat-generated wind before they were blown over by the blast itself.
It's just like that video of the testing of that huge artillery piece America made with an atomic shell for use in WW3 in Central Europe. (cutting off valleys to prevent Soviet advance in key areas.)
They set up a schoolbus with a camera pointed at it. The paint or metal of it turned to dust and radiated off it when the flash shone on it. It probably would have bleached its shadow on pavement if there were any.
if explosives are gonna throw you into the air then you’ve already been torn to pieces.
Like in the Hacksaw Ridge like their intestines coming out😫🤮
The shock wave will just try to throw your bodily organs into the air but instead slaming them against the inside of your skeleton.
Inqu'aante
*k-Kono powa-
10:34 It's not about money , its about sending a message
Next: Jesus Christ rates religious movies for accuracy.
Or rapists at work, psycho killers every-day job and so on.
@@foreverpinkf.7603 ?
The grenade scene from Hancock is actually possible. The weapon is a M32MGL Grenade Luncher. The M32 in this case is firing either a High explosive or High explosive dual purpose 40mm grenade. These grenades are essentially large explosive bullets. The grenade detonates on impact. To prevent the grenade from detonating before it is fired it has a safety fuse that is armed by the grenade spinning. The centrifugal force imparted on the round only effects the grenade beyond a certain range to protect the firer. This range is usually 14-38m beyond the muzzle of the weapon. The round flying at several hundred feet per second can in fact ricochet off of something without detonating, and then detonate when it re impacts something that is beyond its arming distance. I have personally witnessed this. Edit: as several people have mentioned, yes the explosion is not realistic. It is clearly a gas explosion made for the movie. A real HE/HEDP round hitting the front of an SUV like that would destroy the front, and create some smoke and dust, but mostly throw fragments and pressure around. Obviously these are invisible.
T Lee no u
Sounds very plausible, also it didn't look like Hancock hit it frontally either, but more off to the side, at an angle, which if you think about tank armor and angling, it is definitely possible to ricochet it. Especially if it is within the safety range, as you mentioned.
Do you think the effects team had any of that in mind when they animated a small rocket in lieu of a 40mm HE/HEDP shell?
@@cottonballs185 Maybe they did maybe they didnt. I want to believe.
@@cottonballs185 they had millions of dollars, im sure they could have hired a weapons expert to help them understand how to do the effects.
The reason indiana survives the nuke is he drank from the Holy grail from the previous movie so he should have eternal life
Clownman He can’t have eternal life without staying within the bounds of the great seal. His wounds were healed, but once he left he gave up immortality.
@@user-ck9lm6xi1o damn you're accurate with that lol
Jae Gotta get the FACTS right, yaknowhaimean lol
😂
Yeh! He will live forever😂
The hospital explosion in the dark knight actually happened! there's no cgi in that, so in terms of realistic explosion it's a 10/10, because it is real! the guy just commented on the story: him placing the bombs and the budget needed to have that happening. In the movie joker had robbed millions so budget wouldn't be a problem. And the bomb placing: it isn't shown or mentioned in the movie that it was him directly placing them nor when he (or whoever) placed them, so it would be possible
Actually the windows in the top of the building are CGI and they're are a couple other CGI moments, but yes the explosion was real
@@dobson. sure but those are details, Nolan never does gci for big things like these. He actually built a lot of complicated sets for specific scenes in some movies like inception interstellar and so on. Not to mention Dunkirk where almost everything was real
Most explosions in movies are real. They usually just add a load of gasoline which doesn't do mutch damage but creates a cool fire ball
@@Hamsterdam91 Yes, this. Fireballs don't come from explosives, they come from fuel burning, usually after being dispersed into the air by explosives.
Why do people seem to think this video is about CGI explosions looking real? Most of the explosions in the video are real, it's about whether or not they make sense in the given circumstances
I wanna know how realistic "Hurt Locker" explosions are.
I also an explosives engineer I would add the shrapnel not killing them in almost every scene along with the concussions they would likely have is the main thing and grenades having a secondary pin that must be pulled as well. The M203 40mm would not get deflected for the same reason it exploded when it hit the car.
1. not all grenades have secondary pins, tbh i have never heard of secondary pins at all
2. the grenade could be deflected, just like any round, but you would be correct in this scene the angle was far too low
Yeah, I'm surprised he didn't mention the levers not flying off the thrown grenades. The lever has to fall off for the striker to start the timed reaction/fuse.
The grenade in Hancock could, in theory, be deflected if he struck it from the side, but he clearly hit it on the nose, which would set it off.
I wonder what would have happened if he'd grabbed from the back. Would the sudden stopping trigger the explosive or cause the grenade to fall apart and just set off the detonator but not the main charge?
Man you must be fun at action movies 😂
only flashbangs have secondary pins, regular fragmentation grenades do not
@@evilsharkey8954 I agree with the levers on the hand grenades because thats the 3rd and final safety on a hand grenade.
And no @Captain Patches Trapped in Patches, Standard hand grenades used in the U.S. Army have 3 safeties, of which 2 are pins. "Push, pull, throw" Push out the grasping pin, pull out the cliche pin everyone thinks about, and throw. The lever is a safety as long as its depressed.
Adding onto that for @Case White if you're not military savvy you won't know this, but 40mm has a rotational trigger amount for it to properly detonate that no one ever hears about or knows about. I think it's something like 20 rotations or maybe I'm thinking it has to travel 20 feet I cannot recall as I was never a grenadier in the army, but I digress. In theory it could hit his hand below the rotational trigger amount and finish off the rotations and detonate past the impact of his hand. Again, HIGHLY unlikely but not improbable.
The raiting don't make sence:
#1:"there is everything wrong about granates" = 2/10 Stars
#3:"realistic light, realistic damage, whole nuclear explosion is pictured correct but he survive the flight" = 1/10 Stars ....wtf
enlightened_GK ikr?! And then the chickens exploding got like 7 stars wtf. No matter how much you hated Indiana and the flying fridge, the nuclear explosion itself was realistic.
@@macleunin I think it was more to do with the fact that somethings didn't explode that you'd expect to (ie the tanker) he even says that the exploding chickens is a bit of a gag so thats probably why it got knocked off three stars
Except surviving that explosion, radiation, and flight is so incredibly, vastly ludicrous that it really does tank the score justifiably.
ok, you survive a nuclear blast in a fridge with a thin lead lining, that gets catapulted what I can only assume is several kilometres, and casually walk away like its no big deal, and tell us about it.
Tbh plot armor shouldn't be considered to rate the explosion realism
I believe anything INDIANA JONES does on screen!No discussion!
TheArtalex ok cool
TheArtalex so if he decapitates himself and lives, you'd automatically believe you won't die? lol k.
He breathes... so...
I cant believe how soo many people don't understand sarcasm,wth?I thought that only Sheldon Cooper doesn't understand it xD
In an episode of 99% invisible, you learn that you COULD survive a nuclear bomb like Hiroshima and Nagasaki even if you are not that far. With the modern nuclear arsenal, it's a whole different story.
99percentinvisible.org/episode/atomic-tattoos/
Bruh joker has his ways of planting things *Im triggered*
Just wanted to point out that Indiana Jones drank from Holy Grail. He's already going to live for a few thousand years, if not longer. A little, or even a lot, of radiation won't affect him very much, and if anything it would probably just shave off a few hundred years of his limited immortality. You can talk about science all you want, but in that one particular case, lore wise he is protected in ways that the viewers don't fully know.
...I never figured out that loop hole before
@@karlhiscock92
That's the glory of a public forum. When a few thousand minds come together, we can discover things together that one person typically can't do alone.
That fact would probably raise a few of the points, but the fridge would probably have more damage
@@chasebarber10
Let's not forget it's just a movie; I doubt they're going to blow a few thousand on R&D just to validate the 1% of people who question the real world application of nukes vs a fridge.
He's not immortal, I think you need to re-watch it
Suddenly I’m very interested in explosives. Ok roger 😍
I'm Roger, he is Rodger. C'mon man👊👊👊
@@rogerbrydon7215 Ok Rodger
Οk boomer
@@peterlamprou7823 Ok stop
@@Jr.aviOfficial nah
When Clark Kent didn't get the job at Daily Planet
He goes into military instead
This is one of the more explosive episodes.
It shreds every movie apart.
That Indiana Jones scene sounds terrifying if I was him
Why does he doubt the capability of the joker ? He can pretty much get as much money as he needs and has quite a few goons and mobsters to help.
Yeah, there's literally a scene in the movie where there's an entire room filled with cash and the Joker sets fire to it. I don't think he's exactly short on money lol
@@roemip well the point of that scene was that he burned it all... he didn't need it because all the things he wants are cheap, like gasoline and bullets to cause mayhem. But to blow up the hospital the way he did would require a lot of money; high tech equipment and expertise, a lot of time to set up, and hundreds of pounds of explosives. It's impossible that he did it in the way that he did without everyone noticing.
@@83917Michael it is possible, he controls a good bit of the mob and the mob is everywhere in Gotham he could've had dozens of thugs helping him. Plus he has any resource he needs money, knowledge, manpower, and insanit.
@@83917Michael "it's not about money, it's about sending a message "
Most unrealistic thing about the Joker in my opinion is his goons. Like in real life if you had a trillion $ you are just going to find all these dudes that are cool with brazen murders and their own expendability? A show like the WIre would be a realistic take. Boss with all the $ tells his enforcer to take out a politician. The enforcer refuses saying they aren't assassins of civilians, keeping in mind this dude has already murdered 20+ people including his own.
he should have seen the scene in narcos mexico when rafa throws the grades in to the hole they were digging and found the water.
that scene had something special in it.
Bob what’s so special
@@craig2.070 th-cam.com/video/0zJ099GRAi0/w-d-xo.html
Bob extremely agree, idk that was just weirdly special
Much more thorough analysis than I expected. Bravo!