Defense Attorney Grills Psychologist About Amber Heard During Cross-Examination
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ต.ค. 2024
- During cross-examination on Tuesday, the defense attorney grilled Dr. Shannon Curry, a forensic psychologist, about her knowledge of Amber Heard's issues during her relationship with Johnny Depp.
#AmberHeard #JohnnyDepp #ShannonCurry
Watch Law&Crime Network NOW on TH-camTV!
tv.youtube.com...
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER: bit.ly/LawandC...
OTHER WAYS TO WATCH LAW&CRIME NETWORK IN YOUR AREA:
lawandcrime.co...
READ MORE GREAT ARTICLES FROM LAW&CRIME NETWORK HERE:
lawandcrime.com
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF Law&Crime Network TH-cam Channels:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Channel B: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel C: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel D / @lawandcrimebodycam
This witness is so impressive. Calm, professional, stoic. Fully in control of her side of the equation, despite the lawyer's best efforts to dominate.
Can't trip up a psychologist lol
These lawyers’ best weapon is to trap and gaslight the witness or whoever they are against. I’d say that the psychologists are the most capable of being able to see thru all of their bs and tbh, she’s absolutely my favorite person during this trial. Very informative and professional
Love her so much!!! Very smart.
@@jaredvennett4036 I agree...she was very informative 👌 and her testimony stuck out to me.
Trent Larson...couldn't have said it better. Agreed 💯
Funny watching that lawyer try to play lawyer mind games on a psychologist who's literal job is to recognize mind games 🤣
Lol, interesting way to look at it
Thought the same
I’m enjoying the way she looks at the lawyer hahaha. She’s studying her I think. 😄
This comments 😁😆🤣👏👍
Dudeee like seriously lol!
You know something is not right when the entire defense is grasping at straws and twisting things to fit their narrative
Most of these lawyers questions are hearsay. Wtf? Nobody stopping her
Same thing I thought. Heards female attorney is a real jerk.
@@violagentsch that's the entire tactic of jd's lawyers. Let them continue building a case with lies and bs.
@@violagentsch My thoughts as well; they're playing softball to better trap AH's defense in their lies. Trying hard to be more than fair so that their own case is more credible. Very clever, if that's the case.
Dr. Shannon Curry🤥Johnny Depp🤥
i love this lady. Shes pushing back against the unfair questions and is outsmarting this lawyer at every turn. its awesome.
She did a great job of clarifying information after the defense lawyers ask a pointed (leading) question.
@@PearlLV88 considering what’s fair in law happens to be highly subjective depending on the case and judge, simply cry about it.
@@PearlLV88 Never mentioned unfair. I said leading questions that set up a premise where she only had to say "correct".
big props for the psychologist, she is so patient throughout the lawyer's redundant questions. salut to her
You have to give the jury a lot of credit for being able to stay awake through all of this BS.
And they get paid too man must be nice yet boring.....I wonder how much though now lol
Lol there’s no actual proof they’re not asleep 😂
@@worldofcorn When I got called to jury duty last year, the pay was one dollar above minimum wage.
@@shimmeringchimps3842 and that's with new minimum wage (15 an hour) or old minimum wage?
@@bth5202 If they fall asleep they can call to have a new trial
Wow, Amber's lawyer is so annoying. Asking a witness if she recalls testimony of others over and over again. How useless of an examination of a witness...
Yes very annoying!!! 🤬
she asked JD if he signed one document 4 times.. and JD even made jokes about it.
It's to put it out there, so the jury can hear these pro-Amber statements. She doesn't care if the witness recalls.
I wish Johnny's lawyer would object to the stupidity recalling what other people said!!
@@fly89 that was the male lawyer but it was hilarious and ridiculous 😂
The psychologist looks really annoyed by Amber’s lawyer despite her overall sophistication. She is patient and well spoken especially in the previous bit about diagnosing Amber but here you can clearly see she calls it BS with all the lawyer’s rude, pushy and disrespectful questioning. This lawyer really gets on peoples nerves doesn’t she lol
yes, i agree
Extremely!
Sadly thats what there paid for
Shes hideous and so rude.
Ikr! I also think Dr. Curry knows how misleading Heard's attorneys are being at points, and is uncomfortable with it. Dr. Curry is so thorough and explanatory, she seems to be genuinely concerned with clarity and giving the whole picture. I feel like she's uncomfortable with the idea of the jury being mislead on the science and practices of her profession.
She tried so hard to corner her , but the Dr was way more clever than her to a point where she made her look like fool in so many occasions .
Also, it's EXTREMELY sad when a lawyer needs to be just plain rotten with a credible expert just for cheap 'points'. This is utter lunacy. In a legitimate trial for less high profile people, none of this would fly.
🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨
@@Novastar.SaberCombat 100% agreed .
You can't trip up a psychologist lmao
@@anthonygarcia8749 It's possible, it's just hard. I've gotten the better of my sister who is a psychologist, a few times.
Almost had her with the muffins🙄🤣
I love how she has this smirk going on, People have to remember she isnt a Lawyer or anything, she is speaking cold hard facts that are doing nothing but proove Johnnys in the right. Amazing job getting someone like this on the team.
@@therabbithat remember when she said therapists cannot make the same conclusions she can because it would be unethical? LMAO
@@ImXxaXxDreamerXx how is that funny? she is right.
@@ImXxaXxDreamerXx you misunderstood
@@ImXxaXxDreamerXx she said Amber Heard's therapist can't make a diagnosis for Johnny Depp as he is not the patient
88iiu8iu>
I couldn’t be more impressed with this lady. She really held her own and the defensive looked like an uneducated schoolyard bully
Note also how Amber Heard presents herself, as some kind of goddess, flawless makeup, new hairdo almost every day, acting familiar with her team like some kind of CEO, those tiny gestures like picking at the flake in her mascara...not exactly the natural demeanor of someone who is being sued for million$...tbe lack of humility itself is telling on her... she cannot be humble no matter what!
Absolutely! I admire her composure and confidence 🙌🏼
"Defense Attorney Grills Psychologist"
Uh...Not sure what trial you all were watching but the Psychologist Dr. Shannon Curry did an absolutely amazing job based off her analysis and being able to back it up.
Yes she did
Getting grilled doesn't necessarily mean you lose. It just means that someone is aggressively confronting you. I think that's a fair assessment of this attorney's tact.
Yeah she owned that Karen attorney used facts against all that BS questioning what a class act
@@owllyne They’re targeting that sweet ‘girl boss’ audience that makes the big bucks nowadays.
I'm not sure who's doing the grilling. I do know who got BURNED.
A great credible witness. Finally an expert who can talk about Heard's personality.
She nailed it.
I would like to hear from
@@australiamyway she did personally interview her so not sure why you’re giving your two cents when you clearly didn’t watch her testimony
@@australiamyway she did personally interview her hahaha
Having never met her. makes sense.
As someone with a bit of knowledge in this field it hurt to see the lawyer ask these partly ridiculous questions not understanding how the work was done and trying to make a respectable woman look bad. I know it's just her job but that was almost rude.
They have nothing, so they resort to playground style name calling.
They've been rude a few times I've noticed. Yes, it's not an easy job but there's professionalism...
Agreed everyone here this Page
" Precisely my thought"
She's no expert in the field sometimes they make an a#$ of themselves .I also feel it's their job .But seemingly trying to contradict Dr. Curry it's hilarious to watch 😄
theyre past using manners at this point
These questions are absolutely ridiculous. “And do you recall?” “And do you recall?” “And do you recall?” Purposely not asking any questions that the Dr. can answer with her intelligence and expertise because it might expose Amber. 🙄
That’s how this is supposed to go. Lawyers ultimately have the ability to attempt to control the narrative during cross exam, so though I don’t agree with the tactics of the lawyer, she has the right to ask closed ended questions, as that’s how cross exam works in court.
@@PhippsJonah Sure, but only question beeing "do you recall" with absolutely no variation for dozens of times and with little connection between them is very bad imo. Also what does asking a psychologist about the assessments of other psychologists in pretty much different questions do? You can expect the jury to not be totally braindead, what the line of questioning is suggesting is that the psychologists assessment is wrong just because others came to different results lmao
@@TobiasRebentisch Like I said before, I disagree with the approach and tactics the Heard legal team is putting forth, so yeah I agree it was frustrating and quite honestly boring (which will matter to the jury who will probably also be bored). I found myself wondering the same thing about the questions regarding the other psychiatrist’s evaluations and opinions, as that’s very counter productive since one psychiatrist’s methods and opinions are going to be completely different from another’s. It felt like maybe they were attempting to get her to say she wouldn’t disagree with another psychiatrist, but that’s just how I interpreted those questions.
The jury is thinking about defense lawyer just like us. Very bad strategy.
I was thinking this
This jury could be very bad jury, and incompetent just like amber's attorneys
@@mikereed8181 Scary thought
@@mikereed8181 😢
We’re all on the same page!
If Amber is actually borderline, and most of the rational world would agree that is true, then she will most certainly attempt to manipulate one doctor to another to suit whatever agenda she has. Fortunately this forensics psychologist is smarter than your average clinical psychologist bc she knows that people will try to manipulate results to serve them in a legal situation, like checking 19 of the 20 PTSD symptoms and only actually having 2 or 3 of them. I believe that proof of Amber’s perjury, lying, and exaggerating things has no bounds and therefore Amber’s words are not credible.
I believe she shows adhd with all the victimhood and look at me syndrome
i think every intelligent form of life on earth could agree with this comment. if there’s anyone out there siding with amber heard they must be ignorant or lacking brain function.
Taking a dump on your husbands side of the bed is more than borderline.
Exactly like her lawyer referencing Miss Heard claiming the Dr told her she had spoken her husband about the case and then having to restate under oath she did in fact not say that to Miss Heard… they’re only making their cross examination less credible and bolstering the Drs analysis
And that is why this case is already served. And yet, there is a lot of thoughts and reflections coming from this "high-profile" case. I tend to conclude, for starters, that the people we tend to call "stars" are only as we are. Nothing more, nothing less. And the other big conclusion I pull off, is that violence does NOT have any gender.
That's it, I pulled it out of my system...
If you can't beat one's profession, then the only you can do is to urge them to make mistakes. I think this is what the attorney is doing.
1 HUN-DRED!!! !!! !!! 👏 👏 👏 THIS COMMENT DESERVES MORE LIKES!!
1 HUN-DRED!!! !!! !!! 👏 👏 👏 THIS COMMENT DESERVES MORE LIKES!!
And not well.
I agree.
But still that doesn’t justify injustice. Is this something the judiciary committee needs to bring reforms on? Leaves you wondering!
This expert witness is great. Dodging those bullets like the matrix!!!
This Psychologist is amazing!!! She is incredibly professional and she is absolutely gorgeous. God bless her testimony.
when the defense attacks a psychologist.... is not going well. I see.
lol
She’s a credible psychologist with 15 years of experience she’s seen way too many crazies lol but yeah she looks annoyed and offends by that lawyer but too much of a class act to show it
@@Nicholas_Chen_ She can read through their intentions lmao, never date a psychiatrist XD
This psychologist is extremely intelligent and impressive on the stand. She could have been a better defense lawyer than Amber's if she decided to pursue law.
100%, without question (not that Amber's lawyers are that good) but I suspect she would've been a great anything had she put her mind to it. Very impressive woman. So smart it's sexy lol. She's slick too.
@@78LedHead
She is quite impressive, I must admit. She’s able to focus on what her goal is: Stick to the facts, get the facts across
Amber's attorney trying SO hard to discredit Dr. Curry is just so slimy, these people truly have no spine. I give a ton of credit to Dr. Curry to be able to remain calm and professional.
Our legal system is so corrupt.
Dr. Curry did an excellent job against these annoying questions
"So now you're an expert on relationship dynamic?"
Why is the lawyer so condescending towards the doctor? It's like she's taking it way too personal.
Because she's jealous of her. She doesn't want this attractive woman to be considered intelligent.
Amber's lawyers think they are so slick, just like Amber thinks she is. She asks the witness a question and then says "correct" (whether it is or not), and when the Dr. recalls something totally different she moves on to a different question (but the seed was planted in the jury's mind). It's like she's just putting it out there for the jury to hear, whether it's true or not. Disgusting defense tactics.
These tactics aren't unusual in courts.
Her attorneys are just as nasty as she is
Honestly this lawyer might be competent under different circumstances. But given as they’re grasping at literal straws, Amber’s lawyer has no choice but to sit there and continuously try to undermine the credibility of the witness in a way that’s ridiculous and obvious.
I’ve never heard the words “do you recall…” as much in my entire life as I had in this video. I thought Amber was the one with memory problems, not this forensic professional.
@@orangewarm1 A lawyer cannot testify, it is an objection. Argumentative or Not allowing the witness to answer are also objections. So no they're not. Leading questions definitely are, thats the job of Cross
AGREEEDDDD!!!! 100% 👏 👏
Lawyer: "I want you to testify to and Confirm other peoples' resumes."
Dr. Curry: "I don't recall."
Lawyer: "Well, they said it."
SO Why are you asking HER???
“Objection, hearsay!”
👏 👏 👏 💯
90% is hearsay. Nobody stopping this.
Why is the defense attorney asking her about what another doctor said? What does that have to do with HER professional opinion? I feel like the lawyer is just using her cross examination to remind the jury of what Ambers doctor testified to.
I know right, I thought Johnnys lawyer will object againts it
ikrrr!!!!
Exactly how I felt. I'm not certain why any of the 'Do you recall person X saying...' stuff was allowed. Also seemed INSANELY repetitive, petty, meaningless, and insubstantial.
Sort of like Heard's lawyers.
🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨
Defense lawyer tries to say a different clinical psychologist, with more years, has a different opinion. Through her confirmation, it creates some opportunity for signs of self doubt in her diagnosis.
It backfired as the forensic psychologist was able to rubbish it by stating that the one doesn’t diagnose & the other behaved unprofessionally and unethically when giving formal opinions on an issue she had only one side of the story.
Shannon Curry did great in this. That lawyer is truly grasping at straws.
This woman is incredible.
This lawyer is just as annoying as listening to Amber.
Amber: “Hold my pen”
"Yes, this is what I said and it's inconsistent with what you had just asked me." That line was badass.
Tried to grill this great credible doctor. Was unsuccessful.
Defense was pathetic.
And no objections!!!
This doctor is brilliant !!!
Tried to grill doctor and psychologist from Harvard :))) LOL
Good luck with that :))
I feel as though this video is titled incorrectly. It seems she TRIED to grill the psychologist but could not crack her. What a respectable woman. She did the best she could in the presence of a ridiculous defense attorney.
the lawyer grilled her but shes still raw...
ok that sounds wrong
100%. She was a great witness
Right, I’m impressed by her
Why is she being questioned about someone else’s testimony?
They have no other strategy
She is an Expert Witness. Hearsay rules are different for her.
Gawd, this lawyer is a pain in the arse
Ah yes. This was when she was asked to remember everything another person said, with the person in question being someone who would only be in a position to advocate for Amber, which was explained later in the redirection by Depps lawyer beautifully handled. It doesn't speak to the reality of johnny being guilty, only that therapists have to advocate for their patients, not investigate if events took place
An that Amber has a bit of personality changes, didn't really help her out much
Well said! Its so bizarre and just seemed like a huge waste of the court's time for Amber's attorney to go on and on like this, especially when, I assume, the pro-Amber doctors testimony was entered on its own.
Why is she just asking over and over if she recalls what someone else, who already testified, said??? It’s already on the record that they said that, is that not a waste of time??
I can’t stand how rude that attorney is. She is ridiculous.
Literal Karen. She gets so mad when the y object anything she says.
Two things - Dr. Curry in the back if her mind already assessed this inept lawyer
Second - The defense is incompetent and I'm shocked they passed the bar
The shrink is on top of it with her smooth answers.
This Psycologist is so spot on,I have
BPD or Borderline Personality Disorder and she knows her stuff I also knew a long time ago from watching Amber also had borderline.
Heard’s note taking was ridiculous! She was throwing a full blown temper tantrum on paper!
She is probably drawing stabby things and bloody torsos lol.
Same thoughts 😂
A lot of people asking what and why she is writing so much...you just told the reason, she is boiling
@@RealmsOfThePossible Yep! LOL! Violent possessed Linda Blair gibberish. You could tell that it fully dawned on her just how damning all this evidence against her was. Having her disorders, she probably thinks the entire world will side with her. Sad thing is, where she's a woman and it's the social justice age, she could totally get by with it, but I don't think she will this time. She met her match with Cap'n Jack Sparrow lol
So glad I’m not the only one who noticed that!! She was trying so hard to look busy and important but she doesn’t realize how it comes off compared to how she hasn’t really done this for any other testimony and with this witness testifying to her mental state she was writing like nonstop for an hour!
Is Amber using a public defender? No way she’s paying this lawyer.
Very cheap lawyers
She for sure got the blue light special on these hack jobs.
All she has to do is expose doubt,maybe that’s all she can do,I mean there’s no evidence other than hearsay and a dodgy photo😅😂🤣
WHY is the X-examiner allowed to continually ask the witnesses' opinion on what OTHERS did or said?! This is utter lunacy.
If I was a brand new, 'just passed the bar' lawyer and tried that nonsense, after 3 attempts, I'd probably be removed.
This is RIDICULOUS. "Justice for Johnny" and "Depositions must be Heard" will end up being entire lines of *merchandise* if all of this keeps proceeding in such an obviously biased manner.
🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨
Cross examination is looser in rules of questioning than a normal examination
Not even opinions. Just “hey do you remember hearing this?”
If she is testifying as an Expert she is allowed to give opinion. The hearsay rules are different for Expert Witnesses.
Because she did not get the answer she wanted when asking Jacobs!! Improper of the attorney.
I agree! I do not get the point of that and it's not just this witness. "Do you recall this person saying this"; why or how is that relevant? Just ask them for their own opinion/testimony, cross-examine their own testimony/notes, why should one ask them about what they remember about other people saying? Are we like testing their memory or what is the point? Such a waste of time. Do you recall, did I read that right, "correct", while asking them about something said by someone else. Or like Rottenborn tried to defend himself calling the wine glass quantity as Megapint, by reading the UK transcribe. I think it was just unnecessary and irrelevant to the case at hand. Again, what the point? Relevance? Is that Mega-evidence of anything?
“Amber and Johnny were together in therapy and Amber said Johnny beats her and he didn’t contradict her” well ya, talking out about his abuser in front of the abuser, is something you don’t do.
Precisely!
the fact that it was revealed that she was extremely exaggerating when talking about trauma shouldn't be easily ignored
Just because Amber texts and says what Johnny has done to her doesn’t make it true. And after this psychologist’s testimony we can pretty much conclude Amber is a liar.
@@PearlLV88 ??? How can an ordinary person testimony would be more reliable than a professional in her field????
@@eemiaey1410 she's not board certified
@@PearlLV88 I would trust this doctor more than the other one amber can say what she wants to her doctor and he would believe it how can a doctor believe something that was texted to him and without seeing amber believe what she says
@@Corn_baby she doesn’t have to be board certified to practice, she just has to be licensed. A lot of therapist/ psychologist aren’t board certified, but still have all the necessary credentials to practice. It’s not the same as the medical board.
This defense lawyer is embarrassing. This slimy attempt to expose other doctors’ words is going to backfire on her. And I can’t believe that this kind of questioning can even be admissible! This defense team is self-destructing because they clearly have nothing. Thanks to Johnny for doing the right thing on behalf of men everywhere.
He’s so depleted and the fact that he continues to comply, patient and move forward just show the world how strong he is. We all stand with him!🗣
He is also an actor ... just saying.
@@TanyaBucci And so is Heard, your point?
@@vault1021 think she is saying he is “acting” depleted lol. These people will completely negate the fact that he is also a human being.
@@TanyaBucci probably the single worst argument you could make here
@@youtubian2500 This is all a distraction.
Why is the judge allowing the defence lawyers to testify over and over as if they were on the stand.
The way this lawyer is testifying through these “do you recall” questions! Sleeze
Alternate Headline: *Psychologist Grills Defense Attorney*
I hope Kate Beckinsale plays the Psychologist when they make the inevitable biopic.
Grilling is not the word for this. Limping along is more like it.
I don’t understand why this forensic psychologist / therapist is being asked questions about “recalling” statements that were previously stated by other professionals. Shouldn’t those psychiatrists who originally stated these statements be on the stand instead of her? ^^ this was just as confusing to type and reread as it was to listen to this lawyer badgering this Dr. Wth.
Asking someone if someone else said something during their testimony probably isn’t really a good defense strategy lol
I wouldn’t call the “grill” I would call it “failed grilling of”
Yea media still trying to spin it in her favor by any means necessary 😂🤯
AHs lawyers are NOT doing her any favours with their abrasive and bullying behaviour. I bet the jury cringe every time one of them open their yap. Like client, like lawyer 🤮
“So now, YOU ARE an expert on Rocky Pennington-“ 🤡… this lawyer lmao what are they doing?? Lmaooo
Totally scrambling for anything. Hard to watch
Retitle to “Defense Attorney asks Dr.Curry to recall 10 hours of other witness testimonies” lol
You mean failed “grilling”
Defense was pathetic
"Would you agree this defense lawyer is incompetent AF?"
Defense lawyer "Objection!"
Judge "Overruled"
it has nothing to do with incompetence. it's a strategy to make the jury think about the question and even if its overruled the witness will have a reaction to it which the jury can perceive
I’ll point out a few things. She says statements with correct after them rapidly. If you try to recall the question later on you will remember the correct sound and perhaps mistake the lawyers statement for fact. On top of that she’s asking recall question so if the physiologist messes up she can she’s has a bad memory and contradicting statements making and thing she says invalid. Dirty as f.
How is it not hearsay when they ask her questions based on the notes of someone else who isn’t there? When the person they’re asking didn’t even write the notes? Seems like the judge is very selective in a specific direction on whose objections she will allow…
Because she was there at that deposition, and the deposition itself is admitted into evidence. The source itself is not based on a pure recollection of an unprovable statement
@@andreaspetkov5714 thanks. It’s hard to tell what rules they’re playing by/if they’re being fair, her lawyers come across like they will say whatever to make their point against him valid. And yeah idk how long ago the deposition was but it seems like she was betting on the psychologist not having a clear memory of specific statements
What are you talking about?!
@@cherylj7460 I was saying it seems like it should be hearsay when they ask her questions about someone else’s notes on her client
@@omnomnomnom2371 trust me, if there is an objection to be made, it will be made. The stakes are high, even objections that might not stick will be made in order to disrupt the other attorney. That line of questioning was fair game
The lawyer is just another patient in the docs eyes 😂. That doc rocks,knows her knowledge and power and carries herself with integrity and professionalism.
The lawyers don't even understand what this psychologist is saying 😂 like wow. Please educate yourself
@@ashilyjustin4748?
AH lawyer got so worked up on the mention of AH’s ex wife LOL
Just because you’re loud, “dominating”, and disrespectful- doesn’t make you RIGHT. Amber and her team are ALL wrong.
If I had a penny for everytime 'recall' was said in this trial, I'd be Elon Musk 😆
She's so confident
This is the most pathetic lawyer I've ever seen in my life.
Lawyer: Do you recall…?
Doctor: No I do not.
Lawyer: Oooooookay
AND DO YOU RECALL...
no I don't recall that.
17:28 The lawyer stoops to a new low to undermine Dr Curry. It’s so distasteful even Johnny sits back with disgusts.
"I recall him saying that followed by, you need to take the patient at their word as their therapist". noting he did say that but not in the context the lawyer wanted.. I love it
This psychologist is as smart as a snap.
Defense is grasping. Don't think any straws were available.
Why can Heard's lawyer focus her questioning of this witness almost entirely on asking if she recalls another witnesses testimony?
What a nightmare. How could a person possibly want to be this kind of lawyer?
I bet Dr. Curry could answer that question for you! 😉
Amber’s lawyers sure do love to huff and puff when they don’t get their way...🤔
The psychologist's energy is huge.
Amber is so afraid of Johnny , that's why she begs him stay and continues to push his buttons.
a specialist is called to testify, the defense team ask her what others specialists said long time ago. how does that pass in the courtroom?
The problem with these defense lawyers is that they don't seem to really believe Amber. They are trying to prove something that they cannot and it shows
Every defense question is an absolute waste of everyone's time. Incredibly useless.
My wife and I are divorcing, she provisionally took my son because she reported me for domestic violence. After talking extensively to my 7 year old son, social services had decided that she is lying. Now she switched to a ‘verbal violence’ report. Of course I’ve asked for a psychological evaluation in court to protect myself and my son that is the one suffering all this madness. She actually admitted to me in private that she’s after my money, she is asking for 2.300€ a month… what strikes me most is that in this “World of Equality”, society assumes that men are the perpetrators and rarely the victims without even giving us a chance to speak before getting to court. My wife has actually hit me several times and while I’m 3 times bigger than her, I’ve always restrained myself from escalating. Sad but true. Things have to change as the so advertised ‘toxic masculinity’ is poisoning peoples minds and especially young woman that go into a relationship with prejudice against man.
I agree. Things need to change. You are going to be okay. The system is not fair but it looks like you aren’t going to give up. The truth does come out. My husband’s father was the first man ever awarded custody of his children in Ontario, Canada after his wife kidnapped the children. That happened in about 1963. I wish you the very best. Good wins out in the end.
@@catharineinniss9906 thanks a lot, I appreciate it. I honk you nailed it… never give up :)
Who’s the doctor? I’m straight, married and completely smitten with this woman!
her name is Dr Shannon curry she is so pretty she is a very very smart forensic psychologist shes been in the industry for 15 years!!
She’s married :)
@@frida33 lucky guy
I kinda feel bad for Amber’s lawyer, she really have nothing to work with to defend her testimony
I thought the same!!! Making herself look incompetent and she really is incompetent!!!
"Did i read that right ?" Attorney .
"Do you recall?" Attorney .
What a team 🔥👑😂
Grills? I don't think so hahah maybe, attempts to question and huffs
The lawyer doesnt seem prepared. She can’t recall because she’s basing it on memory not facts. People can say “‘they don’t recall” because they don’t want ot say the wrong thing and have them spin it. Unless you have audio or transcript of their answers.
under what rock did they find this lawyer
The defense lawyer took a low blow saying "but she is a PSYCHIATRIST correct?". Trying to undermine Dr. Curry's professionalism. She handled the defense attorney very well tho. Lol.
Yes I noticed that too
Right. As if her 20+ years of expertise don’t suffice.
Yes....she was amazing for JD. They struck gold with her!
I am a veteran with PTSD and I go to the VA PTSD Clinic. The job of VA psychiatrists are just to prescribe and monitor psychotropic medication. The VA psychologists provide therapy. The psychologists are more in tuned into the patients mental condition.
Wow these questions are terrible lol. They really do have nothing against Depp. Simply grasping at straws..
Theyre dissecting her lack of preparedness and inexperience with personality disorders. It’s brilliant honestly, but no one is listening.
This entire “cross examination” is just “do you recall this?” “No”
Dr Curry was MVP of yesterday session. Hopefully we will see more witness like her in this case.
I’m in love with this psychologist! She’s so smart and articulate and she has that sexy librarian look going on ♥️
all this rubbish being asked yet not one has bought up the fact Heard turned up at Johnny’s hotel wanting hugs and a proper goodbye. By climbing into his bed whilst he was kindly asking her to leave. All whilst she has him on a court injunction 🤦♀️
It’s because she’s not up yet.
Johhny needs to MARRY this Dr ASAP. Like today....❤️❤️❤️
take a drink every time someone says "recall"
Or objection
Forensic psychologists & psychiatrists deserve all of our respect.