Leela is brilliant vs Stockfish's Bogo-Indian
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ต.ค. 2024
- Featured is an excellent chess game between Leela Chess Zero (LCZero) and Stockfish from TCEC Season 18 Superfinal, held in 2020. This round 65 game begins on move 9 out of a Bogo-Indian Defense, Grünfeld variation. Leela's brilliant sacrifice in the middlegame to obtain an iron grip over the dark squares completely ties Stockfish into a knot where there is no escape.
#LeelaChessZero #LCZero #Stockfish #Bogo-Indian
I'm a self-taught National Master in chess out of Pennsylvania, USA who was introduced to the game by my father in 1988 at the age of 8. The purpose of this channel is to share my knowledge of chess to help others improve their game. I enjoy continuing to improve my understanding of this great game, albeit slowly. Consider subscribing here on TH-cam for frequent content, and/or connecting via any or all the below social medias. Your support is greatly appreciated. Take care, bye. :)
★ LICHESS.ORG lichess.org/@/...
★ CHESS.COM www.chess.com/... (affiliate link)
★ TWITCH / chessnetwork
★ TWITTER / chessnetwork
★ FACEBOOK / chessnetwork
★ PATREON / chessnetwork
★ DONATE www.paypal.com...
PGN
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 Bb4+ 4. Nbd2 O-O 5. a3 Be7 6. e4 d5 7. e5 Nfd7 8. Bd3 c5 9. h4 g6 10. O-O Nc6 11. Nb3 Bxh4 12. Bh6 Re8 13. Re1 cxd4 14. Qc2 dxc4 15. Bxc4 Nb6 16. Rad1 Bd7 17. Nc5 Rc8 18. b4 Nxc4 19. Qxc4 Be7 20. Ne4 Nxb4 21. Qxb4 Bxb4 22. axb4 f5 23. Nf6+ Kh8 24. Rxd4 Rc7 25. Red1 Re7 26. b5 b6 27. Kh2 Rb7 28. Ng5 Qc8 29. R1d2 Rc7 30. Rd6 Rb7 31. R2d4 Rc7 32. Rd1 Rb7 33. R6d4 Rc7 34. f4 Rb7 35. Nxe6 Rxe6 36. Nxd7 Kg8 37. Nf6+ Kf7 38. Rd8 Qc5 39. Nxh7 Re8 40. e6+ Rxe6 41. Ng5+ Kf6 42. Rf8+ Qxf8 43. Bxf8 Rc7 44. Rd4 Rb7 45. Kg3 Rc7 46. Rd3 Rb7 47. Kh4 Rc7 48. Kg3 Rc4 49. Rd7 Re3+ 50. Kf2 Rxf4+ 51. Kxe3 Ra4 52. Be7+ Ke5 53. Kf3
That queen sack was absolutely nutty. The long term vision of Leela is remarkable and as a bonus... It's extremely cool
Leela forgot to start without a knight
😎
😂
16:54 is a stunning checkmate! The three white pieces coordinating as a triangle to box in the black king is beautiful
terrifyingly good chess...and this is 5 years ago
Those checkmate combos are sick
A great demonstration for the quality of the pieces. Amazing analysis, thanks Jerry! I find it amazing, that none of black pieces ever crossed the 4th rank, only one of the rooks in the endgame. And by the way that was the only check, black gave for team white, just complete domination by Leela.
I really enjoy computer matches. This was a good one thanks for sharing Jerry 😊
The Leela stuff is deep dark magic from a part of the Chess World no human can go.
Astounding. Just got through, coincidentally, watching a Bogo Indian game on another channel with state of the art Stockfish 17 playing Minic, where “The Fish” was even more otherworldly. Played a new variation out of the opening, and pulled a position out like a rabbit from a magician’s hat.
Very good piece coordination and constructing in that rare attack! Interesting indeed!
16:49 you missed the 3rd checkmate possibility , bg7#
Analysed computer matches are much more interesting than GM games. Simply because the tactics are mind-blowing. I wish we had more videos like that. It also takes a master like you to explain these games in a satisfying manner, so there's not many videos like yours out there.
Nah. Human games will blow your mind harder. Watch Aman resetting the board on his opponent from a couple days ago. By far the coolest thing I've ever seen in chess and a bot would never.
@@coachmcguirk6297 Dunking on chess patzers is Bumbletons favourite activity. No wonder he is one of the weakest GMs and gets frequently beaten by IMs. He is nothing compared to Hansen, let alone the top15 players. Doesn't even possess half the strategic mind that people like Nakamura or Carlsen have. His games are only exciting for kids below 2100 FIDE.
12:25 i'm not a chess engine expert or anything, but i think this tends to happen when the computer evaluates the opponent as having 0 good/improving moves, and if it can't immediately capitalize on anything itself, it will pass the turn to give the opponent a chance to blunder, since it knows there aren't any moves they can make that are any better than treading water. at some point a repetition draw is threatened, so it eventually decides to "go for" a position change on its own accord, since it knows it's doing better than a draw, even if it can't immediately find a win
Not quite right. Chess computers do not suddenly decide to "go for" a different direction, there is no randomness. It is all based on positional evaluation. The reason that the computer didnt do much as black is that it was almost in zugzwang. The computer also probably suffered from some horizon effect where it hasnt calculated that just beyond its current evaluation tree that the position starts to turn. The computer will always play the move with the best positional score. This is exactly how people get caught using computers, they end up "picking" the strongest scoring moves just way too often. If you showed me this game and said that white was a person I would instantly say the player had cheated.
Very reminiscent of Nezhmetdinov Chernikov
nice one jerry. reminds me of your lessons.
ChessNetwork covers a TCEC game. Life is good.
Brutal partida.Saludos.
😎👍
16:45 there's also Bg7#
Holy !!
I play correspondence and I've actually found Leela 0.24 and 0.25 the most dangerous. Later versions are more solid but more drawish .
Does Leela ever do better on the opposite end of some of these weird openings ?
You said SF 17 sees QxNb4!! is a winning idea. How does SF 17 avoid this position?
Hey, can we see a chess game where Emanuel Lasker wins for a change? 😊 ☀️ I’ve been watching this channel for years and keep hoping to see one of his games (he’s not my #1 but he’s in my top 5) covered by Jerry.
I’m maybe going into the Air Force so I hope to see that happen before I do. Don’t know why it has to take so long 😅 Unless Jerry is trying to pull an “Agadmator” if you know what I mean 😅😂😂
@16:41, after hypothetical rook b8, why does rook d7 need to be played, wouldn't knight h7 be mate?
Why is 20 ..Nxe5 not even considered? What am I missing?
Have engines advanced significantly since this game was played? It's already difficult to follow games like this, so if the engines have gotten better, it could be more baffling to see those such games lol
Why can’t stock fish take on move 10?
hello
I found the queen sac in the equation that three minor pieces would dominate the queen on the dark squares. It was impossible to remove without losing loads of material what eventually happened.
It does make sense mathematically.
Wassup Jerry, go browns.
I expected stockfish to play a better game than this
18:04 what is the TCEC win rule?
when both engines agree that the position is better for one side by some margin, usually +5 or 6 points of material, and this evaluation is maintained for 3 moves in a row, the game ends in favor of the side the engines think will win.
567th!
17:00 That's not only mate, but also winning the rook!
Chess is too advanced! Only Fischer, Tal, Carlsen, Kasparov and AI engines could figure this out
first
no
Schuggus
Sort of comparable to real life. Those minor pieces are like the common people, when they unite they can topple big wigs.
94% accuracy yet still crushed!
accuracy is determined by a computer's evaluation of the moves so its not a great metric when two engines are playing. If anything, that 6% difference is what led leela to winning the game
Accuracy is relative, 94% based accuracy on which engine's evaluation? According to Stockfish it was playing with 100% accuracy. Accuracy is a metric that is dependent on the engine, the computational resources and time. Put a position that a normal engine thinks is 100% onto a supercomputer and let it run for a week and you will see the accuracy plummet.
Nooooo, I am not first 🤦♂
I was first once lol
@@dylanpthomas One day man, one day. 😁
your time will come, son!
@@coolbeans8682 Until that day 💪
Who decides the inaccuracies of the game? Stockfish. And stockfish beaten by LC0. Stockfish found 5 inaccuracies in itself. If stockfish decides the inaccuracies then it must know the best move. Why did stockfish play inaccuracies? After watching the chess engine games I feel like GMs are only beginners. Chess is a far far more complicated thing. Even chess engines get beaten after a few years by other chess engines. GMs pretend that they are understanding the deep calculations of chess engines but they don't 😂. GMs don't want to get humiliated by accepting that they are only beginners. 😂
this comment is a whole lot of nothing, get a hobby
@@gugumakangume6449 He just stated simple facts. You're angry because you love fanboying over your favourite GMs xD