Hi, Back again. I listened carefully to the entire presentation to get it clear in my mind how the 39 Articles were seen by ministers in the Episcopalian/Anglican/Anglo-Catholic, etc., etc., churches. To be honest, it often seemed to me that certain beliefs were glossed over or understated. I was pleased to see that you even refer to this avoidance of a clear discussion by many adherents. Having paid close attention of your exposition, I come away with the impression that the Anglican Church is a Reformed church, closely aligned to the Reformation theological positions. That's fine but one cannot be all things to all men. Your Reformed positions would be rejected, I believe, by both the Catholic and the Eastern Churches. Thanks for clarifying your theological positions.
What is the presenter's view on Anglo-Catholicism? How does he explain the 39 Articles in reference to Article 90 by Newman?
Hi, Back again. I listened carefully to the entire presentation to get it clear in my mind how the 39 Articles were seen by ministers in the Episcopalian/Anglican/Anglo-Catholic, etc., etc., churches. To be honest, it often seemed to me that certain beliefs were glossed over or understated. I was pleased to see that you even refer to this avoidance of a clear discussion by many adherents. Having paid close attention of your exposition, I come away with the impression that the Anglican Church is a Reformed church, closely aligned to the Reformation theological positions. That's fine but one cannot be all things to all men. Your Reformed positions would be rejected, I believe, by both the Catholic and the Eastern Churches. Thanks for clarifying your theological positions.
Beautifully presented.