00:00 Intro 02:36 Devon-CA | The Effects Of Tragedy On A Person's Belief In God 16:27 Daniel-NJ | Best Arguments Against Creationism 31:43 Gabe-KY | Struggling To Practically Employ Skeptical Thinking 49:15 Patrick-FL | Atheism Is A Faith 1:01:31 Jim-ID | God's Existence Level Is Entirely Based On How Loud You Yell 1:02:29 Timothy-FL | When Does A Fetus Gain The Rights Of Personhood 1:09:12 Rob-(CA) | So "Pro-Life" That I Think Noah's Flood Was Justified 1:24:28 Joseph-TN | You Need Faith! 1:32:46 George-NY | Evidence Existing Versus Evidence Mattering 1:39:53 Paul-MN | Using Numbers 5:20-22 Against Christian Anti-Choicers 1:47:55 Outro
The fact remains that NO ATHEIST on the face of this earth has a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality. All atheists should SHUT UP until they do - INCLUDING shutting down this channel and the rest of atheist channels.
When I was a kid I had to go to church on sundays. Now I watch the Atheist Experience on sundays. Thank you all! Now I like sundays like any other day.
@Brother Nathaniel They don't call because they don't have good reasons for belief a and/or dont wa t to question it.. They strawman Thiest callers? No they dont that is why they ask questions. Deny your words? Elaborate please. In this thread you have not stated why you belive in obvious fantasy. "Ratings" mean Jack shit when it cones to evidence.
@@tylercampbell6365 They screen the calls for theists. It's not the programs fault theists use the same bad/fallacious arguments over and over and over. Maybe you should call in and prove your god. Considering you didn't in the comments. I'm assuming you have nothing new to bring to the table. Just leftovers that have been rejected a thousand times over.
Rob: "The clam was closed, so it was alive when it was buried" Hosts: "You are aware that clams don't always open when they die, right?" Rob: "But these clams were alive" Hosts: "How do you know?" Rob: "Because they were closed" True NPC dialog loop.
How about, water flows downhill and the violent waters would wash everything downhill. We'd expect to find no fossils at the tops of mountains. I find that to be a bit more compelling myself.
Your first sentence is wrong. Rob said they were OPEN, not closed, which is why he thought they were buried quickly before naturally dying and opening. Forrest corrected him by saying not all clams open upon death. Common creationist mistake. Nice try though.
@@NinjaJay_Arashikage I listened to it again and, sure enough, Rob clearly states in 1:15:15 that the clam was closed and that's how you know it was alive when it was buried which, by the way, suggests to me the guy hasn't eaten shellfish his whole life. In a cooked dish all the clams involved are dead, but sometimes they remain closed so tight that you can barely fit a knife through the gap.
Forrest has smiling eyes. They’re quite contagious too. Brilliant man. Love his input. Dave is a warm welcome. I love his thoughtful input too. Great team!
@@chrisccc22 How ? Can you elaborate on that statement ? I think Forrest is ok when he's not being obnoxious, but Matt's arguments are far more effective if the goal is to make people think.
Dave, I just recently finished listening to your audio book. It was incredible!! Hearing you read the book was powerful. It was like you were sitting beside me every day on my commute to work, telling me your life story. I laughed, I cried, I laughed and cried again. It felt like I was there with you and couldn't wait to hear the next thing that happened in you life. But I knew the ALS diagnosis was coming and dreaded when that chapter would come. On this show, when you talked about your brother, I felt like I knew him. Thank you for helping me through my post deconstruction life. Stay strong my friend!!
I absolutely love Dave Warnock. Such a warm and kind persona, and given his health issues, to devote the time he does to make the world a more enlightened place is incredible. Forrest is a fanrastic host, dont get me wrong, but Id love to have a chat and a beer with Dave one day. I could listen to these two gentlemen all day, every day.
I've explained all this to Patrick on Facebook. His position requires him to hold fast to his strawman. He cannot move back on it because that would mean his position isn't rational, and his ego cannot tolerate that. It's entirely fruitless to employ reason when he has rejected reason.
His position isn't "rational?" Says the lost and clueless atheist fool that thinks star dust, moist rocks and mud puddles have the INTELLIGENCE, POWER, PURPOSE AND MEANS to create/design the human being and ALL the co-existent bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intertwined in co-dependent order in the human body :) Atheism is pure idiocy. The religious cult of atheism is INFAMOUS the world over for having ZERO ANSWERS. That's because atheism RUNS from "reality." I would add that as an atheist, you're bankrupt of RATIONAL/POSSIBLE causes for life, intelligence, consciousness, morality and ALL the co-existent bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intertwined in co-dependent order in the human body. Atheism has no RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step by step atheist explanation for reality. That’s because there isn’t one. THINK ABOUT what you’re getting into w/ the cult of atheism. GET OUT NOW. I’ll help you find truth. Atheism has none.
Isn't rational? Says the lost and clueless atheist fool that thinks star dust, moist rocks and mud puddles have the INTELLIGENCE, POWER, PURPOSE AND MEANS to create/design the human being and ALL the co-existent bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intertwined in co-dependent order in the human body :) Atheism is pure idiocy. The religious cult of atheism is INFAMOUS the world over for having ZERO ANSWERS. That's because atheism RUNS from "reality." I would add that as an atheist, you're bankrupt of RATIONAL/POSSIBLE causes for life, intelligence, consciousness, morality and ALL the co-existent bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intertwined in co-dependent order in the human body. Atheism has no RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step by step atheist explanation for reality. That’s because there isn’t one. THINK ABOUT what you’re getting into w/ the cult of atheism. GET OUT NOW. I’ll help you find truth. Atheism has none.
There is a popular saying among us atheists: "You cannot reason someone out of position they didn't reason themselves into." Call me being semantic, but I don't think the phrasing here is actually correct. Everyone has reasons to believe in things that they do, regardless of how ridiculous or absurd they are. As such, I would like to rephrase it: "You cannot use facts and logic to reason someone out of a position they didn't use facts and logic to reason themselves into."
Man, Forrest just kills it every time he’s on the show. I love his videos on his channel and is quickly becoming my favorite Atheist Experience host. Please, more Forrest!
I love when people try to justify atrocities with "well back then" like somehow that's totally cool. Also, Joseph was totally doing a Kenobi "Hello there" since Forrest did say "Only a Sith deal in absolutes". So that was funny. Abortion, for me, is an easy answer. Her choice. Forcing someone, in many cases children, to bear the burden of and unwanted pregnancy is inhumane. To allow women/kids to die instead of the foetus, in my opinion, is murder. I am far more concerned about protecting the living and yes, women SHOULD have more rights than their foetus...or a corpse. You cant take healthy organs from a corpse if they are not registered organ donors. So many reasons why I am an Athiest. So many.
I have only one reason I'm an atheist and I see only one and that's I've not been convinced of the proposition being true that a god in fact exists that's it, but I kinda get what you mean.
@@uncleanunicorn4571 if someone is denied an organ transplant because there are no organs or it is a low priority compared to others, thats not murder. If someone is denied an organ transplant because it’s written into law that no more organ transplants can be made, that’s absolutely murder. If you make abortions illegal, you are responsible for every death that could’ve been prevented and would’ve been prevented with an abortion
@uncleanunicorn4571 they said it was murder to force someone to die instead of giving a life saving abortion. Which honestly is fair, it's equivalent to forcing someone to be and organ donor at the cost of their own life, so 100% murder.
Patrick can't ever answer a yes or no question with a yes or no. And if you let him talk he'll go on and on and on about his story which no one cares about.
I love that Rob calls in, spouts off "new evidence against evolution" and all of this stuff is from the 80's if not older and none of which are really showing anything against evolution.
Evolution? NEVER has there been empirical evidence of a KIND of animal that has produced a new anatomical feature or function to begin a new KIND of animal (evolution). "Dogs" remain "dogs" no matter how far back you go. Same with bacteria. There are no transitional fossils that can be used as evidence, because NO FOSSIL IS EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION, and any and all such assumptions and atheist wishful thinking ARE NOT SCIENCE, because NONE OF IT has ever been observed. There’s not one transitional animal above or below ground today. No evidence for evolution above OR below ground. Under the ground, ALL fossils are found WHOLE and to be ONE KIND OF ANIMAL; nothing transitional. Above ground, living species also have NOT ONE new feature or function differing from ancestry (evolution). No science proves that small changes produce new anatomy. Atheists finding some extinct animal and placing it in some assumed pattern and calling such a fact for evolution, is not science whatsoever. There’s 7 billion people on the planet and 80 billion people that have lived on the earth through the centuries & NOT ONE has new anatomy differing from ancestry (evolution) & that goes for animals also. MINDLESS, NEVER-OBSERVED, NON-PURPOSEFUL EVOLUTION has just been debunked by what is OBSERVED. Atheist ASSUMPTION is garbage. The religion of atheism and it’s ERRONEOUS belief in evolution is hereby debunked.
Forrest: I was at a funeral and the priest said to rejoice because the month old baby didn't sin... I'm done. I was already done for years, but this broke me. Now I'm angry.
Forest's remarks reminded me of a church funeral i went to. They spent 99% of the time talking and singing about jebus. Instead of the person who died. It was so disrespectful! Apparently that happens all the time. Taking the opportunity of people in a weakened state to push their religion. I was furious....
@@neverendingparty1534 What a fucking stupid thing to say. If religion could explain anything no one would need science. The bible gives no answers nor delivers any truth that cant be attained through humanistic values.
Creationists have all these questions about evolution, but apparently no access to search engines. Let’s make it happen people! If we can get just one creationist to Google something, we can consider it a victory.
Here's the real shocker. Everyone in his field knows this stuff, with each his own expertise of course. But he is really good at his delivery! It just shows how little these creationists think they know..... the difference couldn't be bigger! Glad he's on the show.
@@CyberBeep_kenshi Sadly, the creation story is so basic that it appeals to the lazy and ignorant. To get to the level that Forrest is on requires a significant amount of time and effort dedicated to reading and comprehension. Most people don’t care enough to actually learn.
@@Anonymous-md2qp yepp. And of course you don't need to go through university to understand enough about evolution etc. To understand the creation story is bull. In fact, all you need are reading skills. The story has no explanation at all. There is no theory or hypothesis whatsoever. It's just 'gawd did it and the rest is nuh-uh, because reasons'
Amen. He's been calling for 3 years. And Everytime he calls he doesn't understand that all of his "universe is God" evidence is not evidence. He doesn't get that his evidence can be CONSISTENT with a god NOT proves a god. His science evidence is not proven science. It's still being looked at. Yet he claims it is. But most important, he never listens to the hosts. He says his piece, ignores the host, then calls again next week, but next week he will be more angry.
I can honestly say that I do not believe that Patrick has ever learned anything over the years from all his calls. He learns nothing, he says nothing new, he misunderstands what Atheism is. I think he's a total waste of time now. I'd not miss him if they quit taking his calls. I'm skipping his calls from now on. Why I live timestamps.
AXP should refuse to take Patrick's calls. He's been talking rubbish for so long he's convinced himself it's true. He fails to listen, fails to learn and fails to analyse what's being said vis-a-vis what he states. In fact he's an annoying failure.
@@csjrogerson2377 Your "refuse to take Patrick's calls"....ACA shows are more and more becoming "silos" or "echo chambers" or "preaching to the choir", hardly attracting theist callers at all anymore. So the hostility from atheists discourages theists from even listening (never mind them calling) and the ACA now has to beg theists to call (Matt, the worst offender to theists, has resorted to a transparently desperate video clip of 1P3:15 "daring" theists to call). Patrick still provides an opportunity for atheists to address common theist mis-thinking. Until more theists start calling, ACA should welcome Patrick's calls.
I LOVED Gabe's call. Having noticed the problem with not having a good foundation for skepticism, recognizing the cognitive bias and calling in for tools? That is A-game material.
I saw a clip of an evolutionary biologist on a theist podcast. They pulled up a study as proof evolution didn't work and the biologist had worked in THAT LAB for 10 years, published papers from THAT LAB and written his thesis in THAT LAB. They had the gall to say he didn't know what was happening in the lab and didn't read the studies he co-authored when he objected to their attempt at quote mining. It's Spectacular.
Forrest's remarks reminded me of a church funeral i went to. They spent 99% of the time talking and singing about jebus. Instead of the person who died. It was so disrespectful! Apparently that happens all the time. Taking the opportunity of people in a weakened state to push their religion. I was furious....
"They aren't fight for pro-life they fight for control." Well put Dave! I asked a guy who had a pro-life pro-gun sticker on his truck: "I you're pro life what's the gun for." His answer was Fk off! They have no answer because it's a power play.
Really hope they stop taking his calls. He’s not bringing anything new. I’m tired of hearing him say the same things and failing to understand things explained to him.
Yep, he purposefully doesn't answer questions. I would not be sad to not hear him again. I wouldn't go as far as troll but I do think he is intentionally awkward and disingenuous.
Excellent pairing of Dave and Forrest. Both really patient and compassionate, even with the difficult callers - and yet firm and willing to call out the crap.
Dave and Forrest are two of the best hosts. I admire the way they can take calls from apologists who have the same tired, threadbare arguments and think that repeating them ad infinitum will make their fanciful stories true. I find it especially weird that they come on these shows of their own free will and think they will get anywhere with the hosts regarding 'personal salvation.' Such arrogance.
@@craedonbillstowe4587 and on cue a dumb theist comments to show their ignorance. Atheism is a lack of belief in gods and nothing more. It is a binary position on a single point.
No! IT'S VERY CLEAR that they should SHUT DOWN THIS CHANNEL until they do have a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality. The best possible evidence for Creation is the impossibility of the contrary. ALL DIDN'T COME FROM MUD, PAL.... star dust neither. Tell me which one had the INTELLIGENCE, POWER, PURPOSE & RESOURCES to produce LIFE, INTELLIGENCE, LOVE, CONSCIOUSNESS & MORALITY. These facts prove that ATHEISM = PURE IDIOCY.
@@craedonbillstowe4587 "...No! IT'S VERY CLEAR ..." Oh stop it already. Ignoring what your opposition says and calling for banning them is a fascist technique we simply do not need. If you seriously believe that God is in charge of everything, then sit back knowing how superior you are and watch everyone else be flung into Hell.
@Brother Nathaniel "... Why is the atheist so interested..." 'The atheist' doesn't exist, but there are millions of atheists and they all have individual reasons. My reason is that in my country, religionists are deeply influencing politics in a negative way for nonbelievers. Challenging theists in their beliefs to show evidence instead of them using emotional appeals is one way of exposing them as being self-serving. If theists left nonbelievers alone, I wouldn't care to hear anymore about their gods and stories.
The way Forrest gave perfect well educated answers to every single question and it was just a huge waste, that guy, Rob, didn't really want any answers at all. He just kept on trucking. Would have been more useful to feed filet mignon to a pig. Imagine having Ben Bernake giving you personlized financial advice and you just go "nah man, I'm just gonna bet it all on red, got a good feeling". What an idiot.
At the very least the conversation is public, so that even if Forrest's arguments aren't doing anything for Rob, they may be having an impact on the listeners. In fact, Forrest's answers are so good, I can almost guarantee it.
@@uncleanunicorn4571 He could end up the next Bill Neigh the science guy, or Neil Degrasse Tyson... He is already a science communicators, but he deserves to be much more well known.
@@cherrybomb4184 That's not why I like them as much, as sometimes they are too patient with them, but there are others I don't like much for that very reason, and Why I like Matt and a few others best.
Dave and Forrest, You are a great team. Great answers. Dave, I was sad, the first time you were online on this show, but still beating the odds, makes me smile. Keep up the good work, as long as you think it is possible. I'm convinced you are changing lots of minds, making people think about what they believe and why. Thanks for that.
I've hated Christianity since 13. This show has all the thoughts in my head that I wasn't always able to articulate. Matt has cured me of my insomnia, which was caused by the hideous doctrines of Christianity. 😊THANKS.
@@ezbody That's simply an untruth. It was caused by Christians asking me at the age of 13, what I would say to God if I were to die in my sleep and he were to ask me why he should let me into his heaven? Does the fact that you don't believe me me you're a born again?
Forrest you are adorable xD seeing him get all flattered and shocked when someone said that they were nervous to talk to them because they were a big fan. The kindness and down-to-earth nature of him and Dave is truly fantastic and wonderful to watch. much love from an American in South Korea!
Any moron can smile. The fact remains that NO ATHEIST on the face of this earth has a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality. All atheists should SHUT UP until they do - INCLUDING shutting down this channel and the rest of atheist channels.
The fact remains that atheism is INFAMOUS the world over for having ZERO ANSWERS. No atheist can present a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality. That's because there isn't one. A Godless reality is IMPOSSIBLE, unless you think that mud had the INTELLIGENCE, POWER, PURPOSE, RESOURCES & MEANS to create/design LIFE, INTELLIGENCE, LOVE, CONSCIOUSNESS & MORALITY. The religious cult of atheism is nothing but a sect of arrogant, selfish, lost & clueless fools, as the evidence proves. NOTHING OF ATHEISM CAN BE OBSERVED IN REAL TIME. And that fact destroys atheism, because ALL OF IT'S IDEAS are part of visible NATURE (time/space/matter/energy), yet none of it is visible. You have a lot to learn.
What a coincidence! Just a couple hours ago I was telling my adult son about the Lisbon earthquake and how the city of Lisbon was redesigned after the ensuing tsumani practically destroyed it. Just as a tidbit of info, the EQ was so large that it also affected the SW of Spain; the tsunami waves went all around the coast of Portugal and hit the southern Spanish coast, causing destruction in buildings and a number of victims died in the colapses or were drawn to sea. As for Lucy (Australopithecus afarensis), the remains of about 400 other individuals of the same species have been found so far, she is not the only one and they all confirm the existence and physiology of such ancestral species. To Rob: I purchased ammonite and trilobite fossils from the locals while crossing the Atlas Mountains in Northern Morocco. They were found at that height only because of the geological transformations that area has undergone ovee millions of years, just like the rest of the planet. Instead of spewing your ignorance for everyone to hear, go learn some Science and get educated. I feel very sorry for your waste of grey matter.
Wrong. "Lucy" is a total farce and evolution is IMPOSSIBLE. Sorry, but there's been no new anatomy (evolution) in any human, plant or animal for 10,000 yrs & there NEVER WILL BE. Try to face the facts. ALL MATTER only DIES/decaying in disorder. We have the human being as an example: We soon LOSE our childhood energy. Women soon LOSE the ability to have children, we LOSE our 20/20 vision and LOSE a portion of our hearing. We LOSE our health and we then LOSE all the way to our end/heat death - never GAINING ANY NEW INFORMATION (evolution). THUS, we require a NON-DYING/INFINITE/SUPERNATURAL GOD as our cause for this FINITE world. These facts prove the reason that NEW INFORMATION never has & never will be observed (e.g. big bang, abiogenesis, mistakes (mutations) gaining in complexity/new information, star formation, evolution).
Lucy is a farce. There's been no new anatomy (evolution) in any human, plant or animal in 10,000 yrs. There are no good arguments that atheism is true, but there are good arguments that Christianity is true. Why does the atheist refuse to follow the evidence where it leads? There are no gaps in scientific knowledge. There are 5 million red blood cells in one drop of blood. Cells make up tissues, which make up organs, which make up systems, which make up the body. 300 billion cells are made every day. 200 million per minute. Atheists claim that it’s all an accident created by MINDLESS processes (big bang, abiogenesis, evolution) that have NEVER been observed or proved to even by possible by SCIENCE. This entire FINITE (can be counted, measured & has a beginning and END) universe goes ONLY in one direction: “bad to worse,” decaying in disorder and NEVER is there a gain of complexity/new information. Since GENESIS, eggs & seeds mature ONLY WHAT IS ALREADY THERE! They NEVER gain in complexity or receive any new information to evolve into SOMETHING ELSE! Atheism (e.g. big bang, abiogenesis, mistakes (mutations) improving life, star formation, evolution) debunked.
Consider this, Forest's knowledge of evolution isn't even an exception for people in this field. But of course his delivery makes all the difference :-) Just goes to show how Little creationists and other trolls think they know. Or just flatout lie about. You can't beat the facts...... glad he's on the show :-)
@@ministryofarguments3525 ye absolutely, happy to see a fellow scientist who can explain things well. That's real talent. I prefer avalanches of facts to the endless academic debates of reasoning errors. It's good we get some real science facts to show what's wrong with their presubs and crazy ideas
@Brother Nathaniel You haven't presented any evidence to the contrary and your theist opinion counts for nothing on this atheist comment section. Your knowledge of evolution is inferior to Forrest's and we know it....
Patrick was the caller that had me yelling “Why can’t any of you ever answer really simple questions honestly??? Instead of always dancing all over the place and coming up with bizarre diversion topics!!”
Forrest's claims weren't about comparing anything to god. It was literally trying to define how faith was being used. He could have used ANYTHING instead of a goblin. A gold bar, a cheez-it, anything.
@@jameswalton4259 Faith is the acceptance of a claim at face value, without any evidence. It would take faith to accept Patrick's claim that the universe is God, or Forrest's claim of a goblin. They are on the same footing. Falsifiabiality is irrelevant, because you are not testing the truth of the claims, only whether or not you believe them. Having said that, Patrick's claim is actually unfalsifiable, because, although we can test what the universe is made of and how it functions, there is no way to test if for consciousness, let alone divinity. You may be right that faith is required to outright reject Forrest's claim, however saying "I don't believe you, I withhold belief until I can see some evidence (which is most atheist's position) requires no faith.
The design in nature is impossible to explain without a creator. Whoever created/designed ALL the co-existent bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intertwined in symmetry and order in the human body and in 10 million DIFFERENT species, has INTELLIGENCE, POWER, PURPOSE AND MEANS that are FAR BEYOND that of mankind (God). They should SHUT DOWN THIS CHANNEL until they do have a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality. The best possible evidence for Creation is the impossibility of the contrary. ALL DIDN'T COME FROM MUD, PAL. THAT is just how stupid atheism is.
Daniel, Forrest gave some good advice when he said that a creationist needs to support their claims of creationism. They can try to tear down evolution and the dating of the planet, but what do they have as a substitute? But, you can also ask your creationist father where he gets his information against evolution, and specifically what is it? For example, if he says radiometric dating doesn't work, ask how he knows that. Odds are, he will either bring up carbon-14 or the anomalies that people have found. Those anomalies are now used as caveats for scientists who use radiometric dating, so they DON'T use them in those instances. And, I'm sure you know that carbon-14 goes back only so far, but look up the original paper on how it was devised, because it shows how KNOWN samples of KNOWN ages were used to construct the dating curve of C-14. Point that out alone and ask him to dispute that. When he says there are NO transitional forms, yet harps on Lucy, what exactly is he talking about?
They should SHUT DOWN THIS CHANNEL until they do have a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality. The best possible evidence for Creation is the impossibility of the contrary. ALL DIDN'T COME FROM MUD, PAL. The design in nature is impossible to explain without a creator. Whoever created/designed ALL the co-existent bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intertwined in symmetry and order in the human body and in 10 million DIFFERENT species, has INTELLIGENCE, POWER, PURPOSE AND MEANS that are FAR BEYOND that of mankind (God).
If someone is claiming their are no transitional forms, it's a safe bet that they want to see a crocoduck or some other equally ridiculous thing like that which isn't claimed and doesn't even make any sense within proper evolutionary science. Show them all the transitional forms you want to, they'll still want to see a strawman form.
"Lucy" is a total farce and evolution is IMPOSSIBLE. Sorry, but there's been no new anatomy (evolution) in any human, plant or animal for 10,000 yrs & there NEVER WILL BE. Try to face the facts. ALL MATTER only DIES/decaying in disorder. We have the human being as an example: We soon LOSE our childhood energy. Women soon LOSE the ability to have children, we LOSE our 20/20 vision and LOSE a portion of our hearing. We LOSE our health and we then LOSE all the way to our end/heat death - never GAINING ANY NEW INFORMATION (evolution). THUS, we require a NON-DYING/INFINITE/SUPERNATURAL GOD as our cause for this FINITE world. These facts prove the reason that NEW INFORMATION never has & never will be observed (e.g. big bang, abiogenesis, mistakes (mutations) gaining in complexity/new information, star formation, evolution).
Except we have support for creationism, while your asinine, lost & clueless atheist cult is INFAMOUS the world over for having ZERO ANSWERS. Romans 1:20 declares that God is proved by his creation, so I'll prove creation. Can you point to anything that can't be counted, measured & had no beginning or end (INFINITE)? No, you can't. EVERYTHING in this FINITE universe can be counted, measured & has a beginning and an eventual end. That means it was created; thus, "natural causes" don't exist. Nature can't be the "cause" of anything, because DYING/FINITE NATURE (time/space/matter/energy) was created/designed from nothing by God. And ALL MATTER doesn’t do nothing but dissipate over time - LOSING INFORMATION. That’s why you never observe any GAIN OF NEW INFORMATION (e.g. big bang, abiogenesis, mistakes (mutations) gaining in complexity/new information, star formation, evolution), because it doesn’t exist, can’t exist & never will exist. TO FURTHER PROVE GOD; if it can be "counted or measured" it's a DYING/FINITE (having a beginning & an eventual END/death) entity that has a cause. Then, we simply ascertain what RATIONAL POSSIBLE cause has LIFE, INTELLIGENCE, LOVE, CONSCIOUSNESS & MORALITY to give and the INTELLIGENCE, POWER, PURPOSE, RESOURCES & MEANS to give it. No atheist cause (e.g. nothing, star dust, moist rocks, mud puddles, primordial soup) fits the bill. This SCIENCE points to God and nothing else. God proved/Atheism debunked. P.S. - More evidence for God is that no atheist on the face of this earth has a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality. They should SHUT DOWN THIS CHANNEL until they do have a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality. The asinine, lost & clueless religious cult of atheism is INFAMOUS the world over for having ZERO ANSWERS. It’s time to dump your atheist cult, but you have to want to do it. Everybody desperately clings to the atheist cult out of tragedy or wanting to take the path of least resistance & rebel against their creator for the gift of life given them. They simply don’t want to pay the price. They expect “A FREE LUNCH” when life itself teaches you that “THERE’S NO FREE LUNCH!” But we have to pay the price for anything that has value. It’s time you say “yes” to Jesus. I’ll help you.
There are few hosts that I will watch when Matt isn't on. Dave is one. Forrest is an exceptionally knowledgeable co-host as well. Thanks guys for a great show.
I can only watch the show when Matt isn't on these days. He's so irritable and outraged at the slightest disageement that it ruins the conversations for me.
@@Apanblod SHUT UP INSUFFERABLE WHINNER WITH NO LIFE SO ATTACK RIGHTHEOUS PEOPLE LIKE ME AND MATT AS WE ARE RUDE TO DISHONEST PEOPLE, YOU PUNK. GET HELP AND LIFE YOU PSEUDO-INTELLECTUAL TONE-POLICER WITH NO VALID OPINION!
Why is it that Timothy, who sounded quite young, was the most prepared, polite, and succinct with his call. I don't know if he was a pro-life advocate, but kudos to him anyway for having his ducks in a row. I wish he'd stayed on longer. More callers like that please, and WAY fewer like Patrick
I don't find the conjoined twins example to a be a dilemma. That's a case of two human beings who share body parts outside and independently of their mother's womb. It's interesting to think about, and in cases where one needed a surgery or something that may result in death or damage to the other, there's for sure a conundrum that they'd have to face. But it has little to nothing in common with the dynamic of bodily autonomy between a mother and a fetus. It just sounds like it does.
He was reading from a script, and this was probably an assignment his pastor gave him. Hopefully he snaps out of the bullshit as he gets older and starts thinking for himself. Good luck, Timothy!
@@willytingles "Conjoined twins" is not a simple category. Some can be safely separated, others cannot. Either way, that is no argument for personhood. You are, in most cases, considered a person at birth. There have been court cases that argued the death of an eighth-month unborn was compensable in an accident or crime. They haven't taken over precedence in law, though. But to be a bit snarky, a fetus will never achieve personhood, because it has to progress and develop into a baby first.
the error in this logic tho is that both twins have sentience, whereas if one twin did and the other didnt, the one who did would have the right to separate from the other twin and this would be more similar to pregnancy
The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.
I lost it when Patrick claimed he is a "skeptic skeptic" while not grasping what a lack of a belief is :D The accent of an alabama hillbilly is just the cherry ontop.
I started really digging into critical thinking and fallacies only about 3 1/2 years ago and it was like someone finally turned on the lights in my brain. Before I engaged with metacognition it was a bit like walking on my hands because someone told me walking works by using your extremities. I was able to think...just not very efficiently. One of the first books I read was "The Skeptics Guide To The Universe" and it was a revelation (no pun intended). After the first time reading it I started noticing all the fallacies others were stumbling into. After reading it a second time it dawned on me that I was no better. That's when I was finally able to make progress. Being a Skeptic is a process. It never ends because you can always get better at it and it is the most beautiful and liberating path you can choose.
One of the best episodes I have seen on the atheist experience! It is very relaxing to have you both and not Matt. He can be sometimes very rude and he does not control himself creating a very tense atmosphere, even though he is argumenting correctly.
There's nothing better than to tune into the show (I realize I'm a little late) and watch a theist make a fool of themselves, but damned if I don't *love* calls like Gabe's. I've been an atheist most of my life, but I wish I had made more of an effort to learn more about *whatever* when I was younger. You're doin' great Gabe!
I've got to say - Forrest is quickly becoming my favourite host. Matt is great when the caller is belligerent, but he sometimes slams people a little to hard.
Exactly, I often just don’t watch segments with Matt because he just seems really hard on everyone. Of course, it’s entirely his right to do that, I just don’t watch it.
Agreed. I can’t stand watching Matt. I get that occasionally a caller comes in really hot, but most of the time, they are being super polite, despite their poor arguments. And Matt gives me 2nd hand embarrassment. I hate that his personality is often representative of my beliefs.
I think I get why he's like that - Matt's been on the show for what, 20 years now? He's heard the same crappy arguments thousands of times and seems to be over it. You come on the show to discuss slavery for the millionth time and Matt blows a fuse. You've got undeniable proof of God's existence? Great, here's the line, you're number 40 this week. Forrest hasn't been on the treadmill for decades yet, he's also got this genuine enthusiasm for his field that's refreshing. I still love how Matt argues circles around people, Forrest is just refreshing to watch.
Am I the only one who only watches this channel for forrest? Like. Im not really an atheist. I've just been agnostic since childhood because I was horrified by Bible stories. I just love hearing Forrest and his calm explanations
I really like people like Joseph. He called in with an honest pursuit of how Forrest and Dave think, and he was open minded enough to actually listen and try to understand their positions. We need more Josephs!
Almost every theist caller in these atheist call-in shows have problems with ANY question framed to be answered with a yes or a no. And that's because the true, honest and OBVIOUS answer isn't the answer they want to give. The repeated flagrant theist cowardice and evasion on these programs is astounding
"After I talked about my abortions on TV, a lot of men had something to say about it online. What did they say? I don't know, because I don't give a shit." - Chelsea Handler
It pisses them off to no end that they can’t CONTROL random women’s uteruses. Unless they have adopted a baby, child or teenager, if in a position to properly care for such, they don’t care about babies or the children that the babies grow into being, and so they have no ground to stand on, in regards to their stance on abortion. They just think they need to defend their god belief, their pathetic, weak, helpless, horrid god!
46:30 Maybe it's not that you're getting "better callers" but that tonight's hosts are superior at answering callers in a way that's very articulate and in a way that doesn't incite anger in others. Miss ya, Matt!
Really good show. I also appreciated how swiftly they ended a call when it became clear it was going nowhere and moved directly to the next call, rather than wasting time on a bad-faith caller and then wasting more time on a lengthy dissection of the call after they dropped him.
As an educator myself, I must take my hat off to Forrest. This guy knows how to talk to students both willing and unwilling. Forrest, dude, you're really good at this. If I weren't already on your side, I would be now.
For Gabe in KY: Carl Sagan's "A Demon-Haunted World - Science as a Candle in the Darkness" is what snapped me out of it and got me thinking skeptically.
I am an atheist who was formerly a fundamentalist Pentecostal evangelist. The end times was something that was always looming over our heads because of the text in the scriptures that stated that no one knew the hour nor the day of the Lords coming. I often heard theists in my group refer to the possibility of his return being in the next moment etc. It is a horrible way to live. Thanks again for a great show guys and keep up the good work.
I've heard that archaeologists sometimes find plastic bags and modern clothing deep underground in ancient scopes due to burrowing animals dragging them there.
Gabe's question was amazing, it takes a serious amount of self awareness and honesty to be able to notice and realize that in yourself. becoming reasonably skeptical is a process but you've got an excellent head start.
Lol he danced around Timothy questions and statements and deflected the abortion range question with the usual bodily autonomy. And also refused to give a yes or no answer about the conjoined twins along with Forest.
Here's something horrifying that should keep us all up at night concerning "Rob" from Canada...he's probably allowed to operate a vehicle on public roads!! 😱
A suitable Douglas Adams quote: "Religion…has certain ideas at the heart of it which we call sacred or holy or whatever. That's an idea we're so familiar with, whether we subscribe to it or not, that it's kind of odd to think what it actually means, because really what it means is 'Here is an idea or a notion that you're not allowed to say anything bad about; you're just not. Why not? - because you're not!' If somebody votes for a party that you don't agree with, you're free to argue about it as much as you like; everybody will have an argument but nobody feels aggrieved by it. If somebody thinks taxes should go up or down you are free to have an argument about it, but on the other hand if somebody says 'I mustn't move a light switch on a Saturday', you say, 'Fine, I respect that'... Yet when you look at it rationally there is no reason why those ideas shouldn't be as open to debate as any other, except that we have agreed somehow between us that they shouldn't be.”
Wow Gabe. Welcome to the club, with your humility, seeking to understand, and hunger for knowledge, you’ll be alright. You’ve got a community around you that cares about you and your mental health. I have a similar story and I can relate to the difficulties you spoke about
@@neverendingparty1534 go bitch about it somewhere else. What you've said has nothing to do with my initial comment about Forrest and Dave being great. You're just bitching about atheism not having answers when it doesn't claim to, but also it doesn't have to have any answers to just be the correct position. If you have evidence of a god the put it forward because that's the only thing that's going to stop the spread of atheism
@Jon Clark Except I'm not the one w/ a channel, son. This channel should be shut down until atheism is no longer INFAMOUS the world over for having ZERO ANSWERS.
@@blarglemantheskeptic The only life God created in his image and gave an eternal soul & spirit, is the human being: “Then God said, “Let us (Trinity: Father, Word, Holy Spirit) make mankind in our image, in our likeness…” - Genesis 1:26
So the consensus is that the flood was around the 24th century BC, which puts it during the fifth dynasty of egypt. Why is it that if there were a flood, there was a sixth dynasty with no intermittent gap?
What sort of low unethical tactic is that, rageofheaven? I mean... Using proven facts and data to poke holes in a book of bronze age desert nomad mythology just isn't fair!
@@MrShigura I think Noah’s Ark is a minor problem compared to your insane notion that a rock produced the human being. Noah’s Ark has been proven: Paul Abramson is the flood expert and says there are over 300 legends regarding the flood and over 254 different nations profess the story of the Worldwide Flood. There were no fish or insects & only 8,000 kinds of baby animals on the ark and in the world today (kinds and not species). It took 120 yrs to build a boat just to float a little while over a LOCAL flood? No. The flood was WORLDWIDE. Fossils are found on every continent. Fossils only form by flood and there are trillions of them. Fossils are formed RAPIDLY, which is why we know the worldwide flood of Noah formed them. Keep in mind that there are no human records older than the time of the flood of 4400 yrs ago.
And where are all the depictions of the dinosaurs living at the same time as humans? If there were civilisations they would have made art and "literature", no depictions of dinosaurs anywhere....
00:00 Intro
02:36 Devon-CA | The Effects Of Tragedy On A Person's Belief In God
16:27 Daniel-NJ | Best Arguments Against Creationism
31:43 Gabe-KY | Struggling To Practically Employ Skeptical Thinking
49:15 Patrick-FL | Atheism Is A Faith
1:01:31 Jim-ID | God's Existence Level Is Entirely Based On How Loud You Yell
1:02:29 Timothy-FL | When Does A Fetus Gain The Rights Of Personhood
1:09:12 Rob-(CA) | So "Pro-Life" That I Think Noah's Flood Was Justified
1:24:28 Joseph-TN | You Need Faith!
1:32:46 George-NY | Evidence Existing Versus Evidence Mattering
1:39:53 Paul-MN | Using Numbers 5:20-22 Against Christian Anti-Choicers
1:47:55 Outro
Thank you time stamp person/s
About common . Sorry, in too places,,
Oh man did Rob pick the wrong day call! He spewed forth his three “gotcha” arguments and Forrest blew them out of the sky so many clay pigeons
The point where Dave realises Patrick was a moron and snapped 🤣
@@nayR1972 I sure like Forrest. Thanks for your good remakes!
seeing Forrest becoming sort of a regular co-host on the ATX is just brilliant, he's such a great complement to the show for all the right reasons...
The fact remains that NO ATHEIST on the face of this earth has a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality. All atheists should SHUT UP until they do - INCLUDING shutting down this channel and the rest of atheist channels.
i started watching because of forrest. i love his content so when i saw he was on here. i couldnt resist
Forrest and Dave made a great team, too.
his smiles are pretty contagious
And he has a really cool voice. He seems like a really nice guy, too. It is amazing how much he knows off of the top of his head.
When I was a kid I had to go to church on sundays. Now I watch the Atheist Experience on sundays. Thank you all!
Now I like sundays like any other day.
That's probably why they don't get the best callers
@@tylercampbell6365 I don't think that is the reason they don't call....
@Brother Nathaniel They don't call because they don't have good reasons for belief a and/or dont wa t to question it.. They strawman Thiest callers? No they dont that is why they ask questions. Deny your words? Elaborate please. In this thread you have not stated why you belive in obvious fantasy. "Ratings" mean Jack shit when it cones to evidence.
@@andreahughes1155 It's's that and they screen calls..They don't let the best get through..
@@tylercampbell6365 They screen the calls for theists. It's not the programs fault theists use the same bad/fallacious arguments over and over and over.
Maybe you should call in and prove your god. Considering you didn't in the comments. I'm assuming you have nothing new to bring to the table. Just leftovers that have been rejected a thousand times over.
Rob: "The clam was closed, so it was alive when it was buried"
Hosts: "You are aware that clams don't always open when they die, right?"
Rob: "But these clams were alive"
Hosts: "How do you know?"
Rob: "Because they were closed"
True NPC dialog loop.
Haha I love how he just doubled down on that.
How about, water flows downhill and the violent waters would wash everything downhill. We'd expect to find no fossils at the tops of mountains.
I find that to be a bit more compelling myself.
I think these are just bots calling in, it's the google AI messing with us.
Your first sentence is wrong. Rob said they were OPEN, not closed, which is why he thought they were buried quickly before naturally dying and opening. Forrest corrected him by saying not all clams open upon death. Common creationist mistake. Nice try though.
@@NinjaJay_Arashikage I listened to it again and, sure enough, Rob clearly states in 1:15:15 that the clam was closed and that's how you know it was alive when it was buried which, by the way, suggests to me the guy hasn't eaten shellfish his whole life.
In a cooked dish all the clams involved are dead, but sometimes they remain closed so tight that you can barely fit a knife through the gap.
Forrest has smiling eyes. They’re quite contagious too. Brilliant man. Love his input. Dave is a warm welcome. I love his thoughtful input too. Great team!
1:20:30 "Fuck your god, Rob."
Succinctly put! I like it. Well said, Dave. 🍻
I gotta say, I really enjoyed Timothy's call and then Rob bookended that in the most absurd way. Thanks for taking my call Forrest and Dave.
He got them good with the conjoined twins question. They definitely didn't want to say yes or no because it would make look bad
Forrest has been a tremendous addition to AE.
IF the goal is to de-convert theists, Forrest would be far more successful than Matt I think.
@@chrisccc22 How ? Can you elaborate on that statement ? I think Forrest is ok when he's not being obnoxious, but Matt's arguments are far more effective if the goal is to make people think.
@@tracker7661 Look at the last call.
He’s great
@@tracker7661 Forrest obnoxious? Naaaaaaaaaah
Dave, I just recently finished listening to your audio book. It was incredible!! Hearing you read the book was powerful. It was like you were sitting beside me every day on my commute to work, telling me your life story. I laughed, I cried, I laughed and cried again. It felt like I was there with you and couldn't wait to hear the next thing that happened in you life. But I knew the ALS diagnosis was coming and dreaded when that chapter would come.
On this show, when you talked about your brother, I felt like I knew him. Thank you for helping me through my post deconstruction life. Stay strong my friend!!
How did I not know he had a book! I’m sure it’s a good one!
I absolutely love Dave Warnock.
Such a warm and kind persona, and given his health issues, to devote the time he does to make the world a more enlightened place is incredible.
Forrest is a fanrastic host, dont get me wrong, but Id love to have a chat and a beer with Dave one day.
I could listen to these two gentlemen all day, every day.
Yeah man he seems like a top bloke
I've explained all this to Patrick on Facebook. His position requires him to hold fast to his strawman. He cannot move back on it because that would mean his position isn't rational, and his ego cannot tolerate that.
It's entirely fruitless to employ reason when he has rejected reason.
His position isn't "rational?" Says the lost and clueless atheist fool that thinks star dust, moist rocks and mud puddles have the INTELLIGENCE, POWER, PURPOSE AND MEANS to create/design the human being and ALL the co-existent bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intertwined in co-dependent order in the human body :) Atheism is pure idiocy.
The religious cult of atheism is INFAMOUS the world over for having ZERO ANSWERS. That's because atheism RUNS from "reality." I would add that as an atheist, you're bankrupt of RATIONAL/POSSIBLE causes for life, intelligence, consciousness, morality and ALL the co-existent bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intertwined in co-dependent order in the human body.
Atheism has no RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step by step atheist explanation for reality. That’s because there isn’t one. THINK ABOUT what you’re getting into w/ the cult of atheism. GET OUT NOW. I’ll help you find truth. Atheism has none.
Isn't rational? Says the lost and clueless atheist fool that thinks star dust, moist rocks and mud puddles have the INTELLIGENCE, POWER, PURPOSE AND MEANS to create/design the human being and ALL the co-existent bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intertwined in co-dependent order in the human body :) Atheism is pure idiocy.
The religious cult of atheism is INFAMOUS the world over for having ZERO ANSWERS. That's because atheism RUNS from "reality." I would add that as an atheist, you're bankrupt of RATIONAL/POSSIBLE causes for life, intelligence, consciousness, morality and ALL the co-existent bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intertwined in co-dependent order in the human body.
Atheism has no RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step by step atheist explanation for reality. That’s because there isn’t one. THINK ABOUT what you’re getting into w/ the cult of atheism. GET OUT NOW. I’ll help you find truth. Atheism has none.
There is a popular saying among us atheists: "You cannot reason someone out of position they didn't reason themselves into."
Call me being semantic, but I don't think the phrasing here is actually correct. Everyone has reasons to believe in things that they do, regardless of how ridiculous or absurd they are. As such, I would like to rephrase it:
"You cannot use facts and logic to reason someone out of a position they didn't use facts and logic to reason themselves into."
Patrick has been calling AXP for almost a decade with this bullshit.
He sounds like a certified idiot.
Man, Forrest just kills it every time he’s on the show. I love his videos on his channel and is quickly becoming my favorite Atheist Experience host. Please, more Forrest!
I love when people try to justify atrocities with "well back then" like somehow that's totally cool.
Also, Joseph was totally doing a Kenobi "Hello there" since Forrest did say "Only a Sith deal in absolutes". So that was funny.
Abortion, for me, is an easy answer. Her choice. Forcing someone, in many cases children, to bear the burden of and unwanted pregnancy is inhumane. To allow women/kids to die instead of the foetus, in my opinion, is murder. I am far more concerned about protecting the living and yes, women SHOULD have more rights than their foetus...or a corpse. You cant take healthy organs from a corpse if they are not registered organ donors.
So many reasons why I am an Athiest. So many.
I have only one reason I'm an atheist and I see only one and that's I've not been convinced of the proposition being true that a god in fact exists that's it, but I kinda get what you mean.
It's no more murder than someone not making it onto the organ donors list for a kidney transplant was murdered.
@@uncleanunicorn4571 if someone is denied an organ transplant because there are no organs or it is a low priority compared to others, thats not murder. If someone is denied an organ transplant because it’s written into law that no more organ transplants can be made, that’s absolutely murder. If you make abortions illegal, you are responsible for every death that could’ve been prevented and would’ve been prevented with an abortion
Illegalizing abortions is just causing unsafe abortions.
@uncleanunicorn4571 they said it was murder to force someone to die instead of giving a life saving abortion. Which honestly is fair, it's equivalent to forcing someone to be and organ donor at the cost of their own life, so 100% murder.
Patrick can't ever answer a yes or no question with a yes or no. And if you let him talk he'll go on and on and on about his story which no one cares about.
Not only can he not answer yes or no questions but Patrick can't even put his hand on the lid no matter how many times SpongeBob tells him to do so.
Rob should get into stand up comedy. How can a grown adult believe that utter shite!! 😂😅😂😂😂
What Dave says at 1:17:50 about the flood is absolutely perfect and unassailable.
I love that Rob calls in, spouts off "new evidence against evolution" and all of this stuff is from the 80's if not older and none of which are really showing anything against evolution.
It’s all from Carl Baugh, the proven huckster.
Even it did disprove evolution, it still wouldn't prove his tyrannical god.
Evolution? NEVER has there been empirical evidence of a KIND of animal that has produced a new anatomical feature or function to begin a new KIND of animal (evolution). "Dogs" remain "dogs" no matter how far back you go. Same with bacteria. There are no transitional fossils that can be used as evidence, because NO FOSSIL IS EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION, and any and all such assumptions and atheist wishful thinking ARE NOT SCIENCE, because NONE OF IT has ever been observed. There’s not one transitional animal above or below ground today. No evidence for evolution above OR below ground. Under the ground, ALL fossils are found WHOLE and to be ONE KIND OF ANIMAL; nothing transitional. Above ground, living species also have NOT ONE new feature or function differing from ancestry (evolution). No science proves that small changes produce new anatomy. Atheists finding some extinct animal and placing it in some assumed pattern and calling such a fact for evolution, is not science whatsoever.
There’s 7 billion people on the planet and 80 billion people that have lived on the earth through the centuries & NOT ONE has new anatomy differing from ancestry (evolution) & that goes for animals also. MINDLESS, NEVER-OBSERVED, NON-PURPOSEFUL EVOLUTION has just been debunked by what is OBSERVED. Atheist ASSUMPTION is garbage. The religion of atheism and it’s ERRONEOUS belief in evolution is hereby debunked.
@@jameswest8280 God is proved by what has been made (Romans 1:20).
@@wrencestondwanson3437 no
I was already impressed that Patrick sounded even more aggressively ignorant than during his Talk Heathen call. And then Rob called.
Forrest: I was at a funeral and the priest said to rejoice because the month old baby didn't sin...
I'm done. I was already done for years, but this broke me. Now I'm angry.
You're better than me, bud -- I'd have made a SCENE. At the very least, I'd have cussed out the preacher.
@@ringo666 no, out of respect for the grieving family, it's best to remain quiet!
Not the time nor the place, always pick your battles wisely!
Wow thats gross. Makes me ill just imaging him saying that
I thought we are Born in to it just say whatever All Lie
Forest's remarks reminded me of a church funeral i went to. They spent 99% of the time talking and singing about jebus. Instead of the person who died. It was so disrespectful!
Apparently that happens all the time. Taking the opportunity of people in a weakened state to push their religion. I was furious....
Forrest is such a good host. Between, Forrest, Matt, Dave and ShannonQ, this show is getting really good.
@Dorcia (Between, Forrest, Dave and ShannonQ, this show is getting really good.) Fixed it for you.
Good for what? They should SHUT DOWN THIS CHANNEL until they do have a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality.
@@neverendingparty1534 What a fucking stupid thing to say. If religion could explain anything no one would need science. The bible gives no answers nor delivers any truth that cant be attained through humanistic values.
Creationists have all these questions about evolution, but apparently no access to search engines. Let’s make it happen people! If we can get just one creationist to Google something, we can consider it a victory.
Getting them to Google something is one thing, but understanding it, that’s the real issue. Maybe an “evolution for dummies/believers” textbook?
@@ajclements4627 Well, understanding it and if they do, admitting it if it completely destroys their fantasy worldview. That's the harder bit.
@@vooveks Google is evil and was created by demons. Well, a couple of students at Stanford University actually but they were demons I tell ya! :p
It's literally astonishing (not to mention depressing) that people like Rob still exist.
Forrest is unbelievably knowledgeable. He needs to write a book " How to find answers to evolution for Dummies"
He's stunningly knowledgeable in biology and evolution.
He pretty much does that on his TH-cam channel!
Here's the real shocker. Everyone in his field knows this stuff, with each his own expertise of course. But he is really good at his delivery!
It just shows how little these creationists think they know..... the difference couldn't be bigger!
Glad he's on the show.
@@CyberBeep_kenshi Sadly, the creation story is so basic that it appeals to the lazy and ignorant. To get to the level that Forrest is on requires a significant amount of time and effort dedicated to reading and comprehension. Most people don’t care enough to actually learn.
@@Anonymous-md2qp yepp. And of course you don't need to go through university to understand enough about evolution etc. To understand the creation story is bull. In fact, all you need are reading skills. The story has no explanation at all. There is no theory or hypothesis whatsoever. It's just 'gawd did it and the rest is nuh-uh, because reasons'
After hearing Patrick speak on both shows this Sunday I would be happy to never hear his voice again.
Amen. He's been calling for 3 years.
And Everytime he calls he doesn't understand that all of his "universe is God" evidence is not evidence. He doesn't get that his evidence can be CONSISTENT with a god NOT proves a god.
His science evidence is not proven science. It's still being looked at. Yet he claims it is.
But most important, he never listens to the hosts. He says his piece, ignores the host, then calls again next week, but next week he will be more angry.
I can honestly say that I do not believe that Patrick has ever learned anything over the years from all his calls. He learns nothing, he says nothing new, he misunderstands what Atheism is. I think he's a total waste of time now. I'd not miss him if they quit taking his calls. I'm skipping his calls from now on. Why I live timestamps.
@@duskyrose9243 You both pretty much nailed it.
AXP should refuse to take Patrick's calls. He's been talking rubbish for so long he's convinced himself it's true. He fails to listen, fails to learn and fails to analyse what's being said vis-a-vis what he states. In fact he's an annoying failure.
@@csjrogerson2377 Your "refuse to take Patrick's calls"....ACA shows are more and more becoming "silos" or "echo chambers" or "preaching to the choir", hardly attracting theist callers at all anymore. So the hostility from atheists discourages theists from even listening (never mind them calling) and the ACA now has to beg theists to call (Matt, the worst offender to theists, has resorted to a transparently desperate video clip of 1P3:15 "daring" theists to call). Patrick still provides an opportunity for atheists to address common theist mis-thinking. Until more theists start calling, ACA should welcome Patrick's calls.
I LOVED Gabe's call. Having noticed the problem with not having a good foundation for skepticism, recognizing the cognitive bias and calling in for tools? That is A-game material.
Theist: "Evolution is wrong!"
Forrest: "Hold my beer!" 🍺
👌❤️ Every theist is somehow more of an expert than the real experts! 🤣
I saw a clip of an evolutionary biologist on a theist podcast. They pulled up a study as proof evolution didn't work and the biologist had worked in THAT LAB for 10 years, published papers from THAT LAB and written his thesis in THAT LAB. They had the gall to say he didn't know what was happening in the lab and didn't read the studies he co-authored when he objected to their attempt at quote mining.
It's Spectacular.
@@mazazon That's amazing. 😂 And sadly not at all surprising.
"dO yOur oWn rEsEaRcH!" If only they did lol
@@alandgomez5905 Their version of "resrarch" is to look up creationist pseudoscience while ignoring real science.
@@gardian1701 Fr lol
Forrest's remarks reminded me of a church funeral i went to. They spent 99% of the time talking and singing about jebus. Instead of the person who died. It was so disrespectful!
Apparently that happens all the time. Taking the opportunity of people in a weakened state to push their religion. I was furious....
That happens all too often at funerals, too much god, not enough about the person.
Preachers never let a chance go by to rave on about religion.
Survival of the fittest. They see weak prey and they pounce at the opportunity.
Good think religion is a weak predator to even basic reasoning.
@@guyjukes8396 Except atheism is a religion; a religious cult.
@@ThEjOkErIsWiLd00 agree 100%
Patrick is more baked that a tray of brownies.
"They aren't fight for pro-life they fight for control." Well put Dave! I asked a guy who had a pro-life pro-gun sticker on his truck: "I you're pro life what's the gun for." His answer was Fk off! They have no answer because it's a power play.
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."
H. L. Mencken
Oh that's great. Thanks for that one.
“Be skeptical, not suspicious”.
I love that!
Oh no!!! Repeat caller Patrick (FL) calls again doing his best to waste time, melt brains, and annoy listeners.
Really hope they stop taking his calls. He’s not bringing anything new. I’m tired of hearing him say the same things and failing to understand things explained to him.
Yep, he purposefully doesn't answer questions. I would not be sad to not hear him again. I wouldn't go as far as troll but I do think he is intentionally awkward and disingenuous.
yeah we need a blacklist
forrest totaly jinxed it😂😂🤣
The best thing about him is his voice… which I find similar to nails down a chalkboard.
Excellent pairing of Dave and Forrest. Both really patient and compassionate, even with the difficult callers - and yet firm and willing to call out the crap.
Dave and Forrest are two of the best hosts. I admire the way they can take calls from apologists who have the same tired, threadbare arguments and think that repeating them ad infinitum will make their fanciful stories true. I find it especially weird that they come on these shows of their own free will and think they will get anywhere with the hosts regarding 'personal salvation.' Such arrogance.
@@craedonbillstowe4587 and on cue a dumb theist comments to show their ignorance.
Atheism is a lack of belief in gods and nothing more. It is a binary position on a single point.
@@craedonbillstowe4587 Weported for thpam.
No! IT'S VERY CLEAR that they should SHUT DOWN THIS CHANNEL until they do have a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality. The best possible evidence for Creation is the impossibility of the contrary. ALL DIDN'T COME FROM MUD, PAL.... star dust neither. Tell me which one had the INTELLIGENCE, POWER, PURPOSE & RESOURCES to produce LIFE, INTELLIGENCE, LOVE, CONSCIOUSNESS & MORALITY. These facts prove that ATHEISM = PURE IDIOCY.
@@craedonbillstowe4587 "...No! IT'S VERY CLEAR ..." Oh stop it already. Ignoring what your opposition says and calling for banning them is a fascist technique we simply do not need.
If you seriously believe that God is in charge of everything, then sit back knowing how superior you are and watch everyone else be flung into Hell.
@Brother Nathaniel "... Why is the atheist so interested..." 'The atheist' doesn't exist, but there are millions of atheists and they all have individual reasons.
My reason is that in my country, religionists are deeply influencing politics in a negative way for nonbelievers. Challenging theists in their beliefs to show evidence instead of them using emotional appeals is one way of exposing them as being self-serving.
If theists left nonbelievers alone, I wouldn't care to hear anymore about their gods and stories.
The way Forrest gave perfect well educated answers to every single question and it was just a huge waste, that guy, Rob, didn't really want any answers at all. He just kept on trucking. Would have been more useful to feed filet mignon to a pig. Imagine having Ben Bernake giving you personlized financial advice and you just go "nah man, I'm just gonna bet it all on red, got a good feeling". What an idiot.
At the very least the conversation is public, so that even if Forrest's arguments aren't doing anything for Rob, they may be having an impact on the listeners. In fact, Forrest's answers are so good, I can almost guarantee it.
Shall we nominate Rob for the Nobel Prize? He knows so much, even things we cannot know.
Rob was good value. Truly custard-brained and proud of it.
He was truly pathetic on every level. I pity anyone who knows him.
custard is Way too kind of a desciption for the #%&* rob has for a brain
Holy freaking freakishness!! It's Dave Warnock and Forrest Valkai hosting TAE!!! Wow, two of my all time favorite Atheists!! This should be good!
Forest is destined for The Atheist Experience by completely logical, totally natural forces.
@@uncleanunicorn4571 He could end up the next Bill Neigh the science guy, or Neil Degrasse Tyson... He is already a science communicators, but he deserves to be much more well known.
Mine too ! They are the best and so kind and patient with callers. I love them.
Same
@@cherrybomb4184 That's not why I like them as much, as sometimes they are too patient with them, but there are others I don't like much for that very reason, and Why I like Matt and a few others best.
I was super stoked to see Dave and Forrest hosting this episode. They did not disappoint.
Love Dave and Forest. I found Forest's youtube channel during the pandemic. So glad he is a guest on the show.
Patrick is actually pretty good at wasting the show's time. I'm not even kidding. Everytime he calls it's impressive
I believe it is entirely his aim to do just that.
Patrick makes me disappointed that we are the same species.
Patrick is liar.
Patrick lives under a rock
@@richelleeasley6492 nah he loves under the sea.
Dave and Forrest, You are a great team. Great answers. Dave, I was sad, the first time you were online on this show, but still beating the odds, makes me smile. Keep up the good work, as long as you think it is possible. I'm convinced you are changing lots of minds, making people think about what they believe and why. Thanks for that.
I've hated Christianity since 13. This
show has all the thoughts in my head
that I wasn't always able to articulate.
Matt has cured me of my insomnia,
which was caused by the hideous
doctrines of Christianity. 😊THANKS.
You've never been a true insomniac. 🤪
@@ezbody That's simply an untruth.
It was caused by Christians asking
me at the age of 13, what I would say
to God if I were to die in my sleep and
he were to ask me why he should let
me into his heaven? Does the fact that
you don't believe me me you're a born
again?
@@ookeekthelibrarian I asked if
you were frustrated? Have you ever
tried getting help for your 🍸drinking?!
The scary thing is that Rob character is probably breeding and filling his kids’ soft heads with all that creationist nonsense.
Not to mention raising them to believe that some newborn babies deserve to die as punishment for 'sin".
Does this mean you're admitting to a
hard head? Just kidding. I don't agree
with Rob either.
Forrest you are adorable xD seeing him get all flattered and shocked when someone said that they were nervous to talk to them because they were a big fan. The kindness and down-to-earth nature of him and Dave is truly fantastic and wonderful to watch. much love from an American in South Korea!
I love the fact that Forrest has become such a fixture on the show. Everytime I see him in the thumbnail, I click. Just a joy of a human being 👍🏾
Any moron can smile. The fact remains that NO ATHEIST on the face of this earth has a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality. All atheists should SHUT UP until they do - INCLUDING shutting down this channel and the rest of atheist channels.
Agreed.
The fact remains that atheism is INFAMOUS the world over for having ZERO ANSWERS. No atheist can present a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality. That's because there isn't one.
A Godless reality is IMPOSSIBLE, unless you think that mud had the INTELLIGENCE, POWER, PURPOSE, RESOURCES & MEANS to create/design LIFE, INTELLIGENCE, LOVE, CONSCIOUSNESS & MORALITY. The religious cult of atheism is nothing but a sect of arrogant, selfish, lost & clueless fools, as the evidence proves. NOTHING OF ATHEISM CAN BE OBSERVED IN REAL TIME. And that fact destroys atheism, because ALL OF IT'S IDEAS are part of visible NATURE (time/space/matter/energy), yet none of it is visible. You have a lot to learn.
What a coincidence! Just a couple hours ago I was telling my adult son about the Lisbon earthquake and how the city of Lisbon was redesigned after the ensuing tsumani practically destroyed it. Just as a tidbit of info, the EQ was so large that it also affected the SW of Spain; the tsunami waves went all around the coast of Portugal and hit the southern Spanish coast, causing destruction in buildings and a number of victims died in the colapses or were drawn to sea.
As for Lucy (Australopithecus afarensis), the remains of about 400 other individuals of the same species have been found so far, she is not the only one and they all confirm the existence and physiology of such ancestral species.
To Rob: I purchased ammonite and trilobite fossils from the locals while crossing the Atlas Mountains in Northern Morocco. They were found at that height only because of the geological transformations that area has undergone ovee millions of years, just like the rest of the planet. Instead of spewing your ignorance for everyone to hear, go learn some Science and get educated. I feel very sorry for your waste of grey matter.
Wrong. "Lucy" is a total farce and evolution is IMPOSSIBLE. Sorry, but there's been no new anatomy (evolution) in any human, plant or animal for 10,000 yrs & there NEVER WILL BE. Try to face the facts. ALL MATTER only DIES/decaying in disorder. We have the human being as an example: We soon LOSE our childhood energy. Women soon LOSE the ability to have children, we LOSE our 20/20 vision and LOSE a portion of our hearing. We LOSE our health and we then LOSE all the way to our end/heat death - never GAINING ANY NEW INFORMATION (evolution). THUS, we require a NON-DYING/INFINITE/SUPERNATURAL GOD as our cause for this FINITE world. These facts prove the reason that NEW INFORMATION never has & never will be observed (e.g. big bang, abiogenesis, mistakes (mutations) gaining in complexity/new information, star formation, evolution).
Lucy is a farce. There's been no new anatomy (evolution) in any human, plant or animal in 10,000 yrs. There are no good arguments that atheism is true, but there are good arguments that Christianity is true. Why does the atheist refuse to follow the evidence where it leads? There are no gaps in scientific knowledge.
There are 5 million red blood cells in one drop of blood. Cells make up tissues, which make up organs, which make up systems, which make up the body. 300 billion cells are made every day. 200 million per minute. Atheists claim that it’s all an accident created by MINDLESS processes (big bang, abiogenesis, evolution) that have NEVER been observed or proved to even by possible by SCIENCE. This entire FINITE (can be counted, measured & has a beginning and END) universe goes ONLY in one direction: “bad to worse,” decaying in disorder and NEVER is there a gain of complexity/new information. Since GENESIS, eggs & seeds mature ONLY WHAT IS ALREADY THERE! They NEVER gain in complexity or receive any new information to evolve into SOMETHING ELSE! Atheism (e.g. big bang, abiogenesis, mistakes (mutations) improving life, star formation, evolution) debunked.
Everytime Forrest is on here, he always dances to the music. It's fun to see.
Consider this, Forest's knowledge of evolution isn't even an exception for people in this field. But of course his delivery makes all the difference :-)
Just goes to show how Little creationists and other trolls think they know. Or just flatout lie about.
You can't beat the facts...... glad he's on the show :-)
He's an excellent addition to the team, a worthy host.
@@ministryofarguments3525 ye absolutely, happy to see a fellow scientist who can explain things well. That's real talent.
I prefer avalanches of facts to the endless academic debates of reasoning errors. It's good we get some real science facts to show what's wrong with their presubs and crazy ideas
@Brother Nathaniel You haven't presented any evidence to the contrary and your theist opinion counts for nothing on this atheist comment section. Your knowledge of evolution is inferior to Forrest's and we know it....
@Brother Nathaniel New alt?
Forest is destined for The Atheist Experience by completely logical, totally natural forces.
Rob is a good example what religion does to people;unable to process what is natural and factual!
Rob is also a good example of what christianity does to their humanity and decency.
I love every time forrest is on. I watch everything he's been in on the aca network
Thank you for the laugh Rob, I really needed it.
Rob = call (laugh) of the day!! Ty Rob.
Forrest's reply regarding researching the different types of logical fallacies is very helpful. Thanks.
“You hear hooves, think horses not zebras”.
I hear hooves I think coconuts🤷🏻♂️
Lol, only in movies though. And even more so in Monty Python movies :)
@@aditsu are you suggesting coconuts migrate?
@@jackabalas Strangely, coconuts do to a certain degree... There are palm trees in the UK from coconuts washing up there on the Gulf Stream...
@@t800fantasm2 really? I assumed they arrived to the UK via the African Swallow or perhaps pairs of European Swallows
@@jackabalas But they aren't migratory.
Patrick was the caller that had me yelling “Why can’t any of you ever answer really simple questions honestly??? Instead of always dancing all over the place and coming up with bizarre diversion topics!!”
Forrest's claims weren't about comparing anything to god. It was literally trying to define how faith was being used. He could have used ANYTHING instead of a goblin. A gold bar, a cheez-it, anything.
@@jameswalton4259 Faith is the acceptance of a claim at face value, without any evidence. It would take faith to accept Patrick's claim that the universe is God, or Forrest's claim of a goblin. They are on the same footing.
Falsifiabiality is irrelevant, because you are not testing the truth of the claims, only whether or not you believe them. Having said that, Patrick's claim is actually unfalsifiable, because, although we can test what the universe is made of and how it functions, there is no way to test if for consciousness, let alone divinity.
You may be right that faith is required to outright reject Forrest's claim, however saying "I don't believe you, I withhold belief until I can see some evidence (which is most atheist's position) requires no faith.
@@jameswalton4259 - Hey James, you appear to be geotropically replicate of 'Patrick'.'.
@@jameswalton4259- That, my friend, appears to be fairly obvious. Thank you for your confirmation.
Just another double digit I.Q, mouth breather. I wonder if he's built a still and had been testing the results before he called.
No Christian ever believes that the bible means what it says:
The Christian is always convinced that it says what they mean.
LOL! A totally lost & clueless secularist thinks they can speak for Christianity! LOL!
Wrong!
How so @@johnmoriarty4827
people like Rob drive the point home how religion needs to go, it really does
Thanks for having Forrest back i do enjoy the shows with him. Dave is a great host as well.
The design in nature is impossible to explain without a creator. Whoever created/designed ALL the co-existent bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intertwined in symmetry and order in the human body and in 10 million DIFFERENT species, has INTELLIGENCE, POWER, PURPOSE AND MEANS that are FAR BEYOND that of mankind (God).
They should SHUT DOWN THIS CHANNEL until they do have a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality. The best possible evidence for Creation is the impossibility of the contrary. ALL DIDN'T COME FROM MUD, PAL. THAT is just how stupid atheism is.
@@wrencestondwanson3437 Why isn't your "god" answering my prayer?
Do you know what I prayed for?
@@wrencestondwanson3437 🌝
@@wrencestondwanson3437 Fallacy...argument from ignorance.
@@wrencestondwanson3437 Sounds like you're being arrogant again. What does the buybull say about arrogance? Oh yeah, god hates it.
Daniel, Forrest gave some good advice when he said that a creationist needs to support their claims of creationism. They can try to tear down evolution and the dating of the planet, but what do they have as a substitute? But, you can also ask your creationist father where he gets his information against evolution, and specifically what is it? For example, if he says radiometric dating doesn't work, ask how he knows that. Odds are, he will either bring up carbon-14 or the anomalies that people have found. Those anomalies are now used as caveats for scientists who use radiometric dating, so they DON'T use them in those instances. And, I'm sure you know that carbon-14 goes back only so far, but look up the original paper on how it was devised, because it shows how KNOWN samples of KNOWN ages were used to construct the dating curve of C-14. Point that out alone and ask him to dispute that.
When he says there are NO transitional forms, yet harps on Lucy, what exactly is he talking about?
They should SHUT DOWN THIS CHANNEL until they do have a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality. The best possible evidence for Creation is the impossibility of the contrary. ALL DIDN'T COME FROM MUD, PAL.
The design in nature is impossible to explain without a creator. Whoever created/designed ALL the co-existent bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intertwined in symmetry and order in the human body and in 10 million DIFFERENT species, has INTELLIGENCE, POWER, PURPOSE AND MEANS that are FAR BEYOND that of mankind (God).
If someone is claiming their are no transitional forms, it's a safe bet that they want to see a crocoduck or some other equally ridiculous thing like that which isn't claimed and doesn't even make any sense within proper evolutionary science. Show them all the transitional forms you want to, they'll still want to see a strawman form.
2 comments here are shadowed.
"Lucy" is a total farce and evolution is IMPOSSIBLE. Sorry, but there's been no new anatomy (evolution) in any human, plant or animal for 10,000 yrs & there NEVER WILL BE. Try to face the facts. ALL MATTER only DIES/decaying in disorder. We have the human being as an example: We soon LOSE our childhood energy. Women soon LOSE the ability to have children, we LOSE our 20/20 vision and LOSE a portion of our hearing. We LOSE our health and we then LOSE all the way to our end/heat death - never GAINING ANY NEW INFORMATION (evolution). THUS, we require a NON-DYING/INFINITE/SUPERNATURAL GOD as our cause for this FINITE world. These facts prove the reason that NEW INFORMATION never has & never will be observed (e.g. big bang, abiogenesis, mistakes (mutations) gaining in complexity/new information, star formation, evolution).
Except we have support for creationism, while your asinine, lost & clueless atheist cult is INFAMOUS the world over for having ZERO ANSWERS.
Romans 1:20 declares that God is proved by his creation, so I'll prove creation. Can you point to anything that can't be counted, measured & had no beginning or end (INFINITE)? No, you can't. EVERYTHING in this FINITE universe can be counted, measured & has a beginning and an eventual end. That means it was created; thus, "natural causes" don't exist. Nature can't be the "cause" of anything, because DYING/FINITE NATURE (time/space/matter/energy) was created/designed from nothing by God. And ALL MATTER doesn’t do nothing but dissipate over time - LOSING INFORMATION. That’s why you never observe any GAIN OF NEW INFORMATION (e.g. big bang, abiogenesis, mistakes (mutations) gaining in complexity/new information, star formation, evolution), because it doesn’t exist, can’t exist & never will exist.
TO FURTHER PROVE GOD; if it can be "counted or measured" it's a DYING/FINITE (having a beginning & an eventual END/death) entity that has a cause. Then, we simply ascertain what RATIONAL POSSIBLE cause has LIFE, INTELLIGENCE, LOVE, CONSCIOUSNESS & MORALITY to give and the INTELLIGENCE, POWER, PURPOSE, RESOURCES & MEANS to give it. No atheist cause (e.g. nothing, star dust, moist rocks, mud puddles, primordial soup) fits the bill. This SCIENCE points to God and nothing else. God proved/Atheism debunked.
P.S. - More evidence for God is that no atheist on the face of this earth has a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality. They should SHUT DOWN THIS CHANNEL until they do have a RATIONAL/POSSIBLE, step-by-step atheist explanation for reality. The asinine, lost & clueless religious cult of atheism is INFAMOUS the world over for having ZERO ANSWERS. It’s time to dump your atheist cult, but you have to want to do it. Everybody desperately clings to the atheist cult out of tragedy or wanting to take the path of least resistance & rebel against their creator for the gift of life given them. They simply don’t want to pay the price. They expect “A FREE LUNCH” when life itself teaches you that “THERE’S NO FREE LUNCH!” But we have to pay the price for anything that has value. It’s time you say “yes” to Jesus. I’ll help you.
There are few hosts that I will watch when Matt isn't on. Dave is one. Forrest is an exceptionally knowledgeable co-host as well. Thanks guys for a great show.
I can only watch the show when Matt isn't on these days. He's so irritable and outraged at the slightest disageement that it ruins the conversations for me.
@@Apanblod SHUT UP INSUFFERABLE WHINNER WITH NO LIFE SO ATTACK RIGHTHEOUS PEOPLE LIKE ME AND MATT AS WE ARE RUDE TO DISHONEST PEOPLE, YOU PUNK.
GET HELP AND LIFE YOU PSEUDO-INTELLECTUAL TONE-POLICER WITH NO VALID OPINION!
Agree. These 2 are great!!
Why is it that Timothy, who sounded quite young, was the most prepared, polite, and succinct with his call. I don't know if he was a pro-life advocate, but kudos to him anyway for having his ducks in a row. I wish he'd stayed on longer. More callers like that please, and WAY fewer like Patrick
He brought his "A-Game" and I really liked the dilemma of conjoined twins.
I don't find the conjoined twins example to a be a dilemma. That's a case of two human beings who share body parts outside and independently of their mother's womb. It's interesting to think about, and in cases where one needed a surgery or something that may result in death or damage to the other, there's for sure a conundrum that they'd have to face. But it has little to nothing in common with the dynamic of bodily autonomy between a mother and a fetus. It just sounds like it does.
He was reading from a script, and this was probably an assignment his pastor gave him. Hopefully he snaps out of the bullshit as he gets older and starts thinking for himself. Good luck, Timothy!
@@willytingles "Conjoined twins" is not a simple category. Some can be safely separated, others cannot. Either way, that is no argument for personhood.
You are, in most cases, considered a person at birth. There have been court cases that argued the death of an eighth-month unborn was compensable in an accident or crime. They haven't taken over precedence in law, though.
But to be a bit snarky, a fetus will never achieve personhood, because it has to progress and develop into a baby first.
the error in this logic tho is that both twins have sentience, whereas if one twin did and the other didnt, the one who did would have the right to separate from the other twin and this would be more similar to pregnancy
The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.
I remember Rob, he was part of the "late onslaught of nutters" a couple years back.
I lost it when Patrick claimed he is a "skeptic skeptic" while not grasping what a lack of a belief is :D
The accent of an alabama hillbilly is just the cherry ontop.
In his defense, he's pretty damned good at billiards.
Amazing combo of yout two guys, great episode. Another great combination of hosts is Matt and Shanon :)
Great show as always guys!
I started really digging into critical thinking and fallacies only about 3 1/2 years ago and it was like someone finally turned on the lights in my brain.
Before I engaged with metacognition it was a bit like walking on my hands because someone told me walking works by using your extremities. I was able to think...just not very efficiently.
One of the first books I read was "The Skeptics Guide To The Universe" and it was a revelation (no pun intended).
After the first time reading it I started noticing all the fallacies others were stumbling into.
After reading it a second time it dawned on me that I was no better. That's when I was finally able to make progress.
Being a Skeptic is a process. It never ends because you can always get better at it and it is the most beautiful and liberating path you can choose.
One of the best episodes I have seen on the atheist experience! It is very relaxing to have you both and not Matt. He can be sometimes very rude and he does not control himself creating a very tense atmosphere, even though he is argumenting correctly.
There's nothing better than to tune into the show (I realize I'm a little late) and watch a theist make a fool of themselves, but damned if I don't *love* calls like Gabe's. I've been an atheist most of my life, but I wish I had made more of an effort to learn more about *whatever* when I was younger. You're doin' great Gabe!
I've got to say - Forrest is quickly becoming my favourite host. Matt is great when the caller is belligerent, but he sometimes slams people a little to hard.
Exactly, I often just don’t watch segments with Matt because he just seems really hard on everyone. Of course, it’s entirely his right to do that, I just don’t watch it.
Agreed. I can’t stand watching Matt. I get that occasionally a caller comes in really hot, but most of the time, they are being super polite, despite their poor arguments. And Matt gives me 2nd hand embarrassment. I hate that his personality is often representative of my beliefs.
You are right.
I think I get why he's like that - Matt's been on the show for what, 20 years now? He's heard the same crappy arguments thousands of times and seems to be over it. You come on the show to discuss slavery for the millionth time and Matt blows a fuse.
You've got undeniable proof of God's existence? Great, here's the line, you're number 40 this week.
Forrest hasn't been on the treadmill for decades yet, he's also got this genuine enthusiasm for his field that's refreshing. I still love how Matt argues circles around people, Forrest is just refreshing to watch.
This is one of the most entertaining episodes I have ever seen 😂😂😂
Am I the only one who only watches this channel for forrest? Like. Im not really an atheist. I've just been agnostic since childhood because I was horrified by Bible stories. I just love hearing Forrest and his calm explanations
I really like people like Joseph. He called in with an honest pursuit of how Forrest and Dave think, and he was open minded enough to actually listen and try to understand their positions. We need more Josephs!
These two hosts, both knowledgeable and amicable, make for an interesting, entertaining and enjoyable experience.
Rob has problems with the yes and no questions. And he doesn't really care about the lives of babies.
Almost every theist caller in these atheist call-in shows have problems with ANY question framed to be answered with a yes or a no. And that's because the true, honest and OBVIOUS answer isn't the answer they want to give. The repeated flagrant theist cowardice and evasion on these programs is astounding
"After I talked about my abortions on TV, a lot of men had something to say about it online. What did they say? I don't know, because I don't give a shit." - Chelsea Handler
...trust...noone is upset that that thing isn't procreating...
It pisses them off to no end that they can’t CONTROL random women’s uteruses.
Unless they have adopted a baby, child or teenager, if in a position to properly care for such, they don’t care about babies or the children that the babies grow into being, and so they have no ground to stand on, in regards to their stance on abortion. They just think they need to defend their god belief, their pathetic, weak, helpless, horrid god!
46:30 Maybe it's not that you're getting "better callers" but that tonight's hosts are superior at answering callers in a way that's very articulate and in a way that doesn't incite anger in others.
Miss ya, Matt!
Really good show. I also appreciated how swiftly they ended a call when it became clear it was going nowhere and moved directly to the next call, rather than wasting time on a bad-faith caller and then wasting more time on a lengthy dissection of the call after they dropped him.
Right on Gabe!!!!!!!!!!!!! Keep learning, you'll become a junkie for truth like so many of us. It is sooooo liberating!
As an educator myself, I must take my hat off to Forrest. This guy knows how to talk to students both willing and unwilling. Forrest, dude, you're really good at this. If I weren't already on your side, I would be now.
For Gabe in KY: Carl Sagan's "A Demon-Haunted World - Science as a Candle in the Darkness" is what snapped me out of it and got me thinking skeptically.
Excellent duo today!!!
No fossils of transitional species? EVERY fossil, and EVERY species, is transitional. Including our own.
Paul, thanks for your help in fighting for human rights and bodily autonomy!!
I am an atheist who was formerly a fundamentalist Pentecostal evangelist. The end times was something that was always looming over our heads because of the text in the scriptures that stated that no one knew the hour nor the day of the Lords coming. I often heard theists in my group refer to the possibility of his return being in the next moment etc. It is a horrible way to live. Thanks again for a great show guys and keep up the good work.
I've heard that archaeologists sometimes find plastic bags and modern clothing deep underground in ancient scopes due to burrowing animals dragging them there.
Faith is lack of knowledge, lack of evidence and lack of facts but believing it anyway.
Always learning from Forrest. Great show. Dave is also one of my favorite hosts. Great combo.
So a lot of people question when in a fetus's development it gains human rights, but no one asks when in that development does a woman lose theirs.
Gabe's question was amazing, it takes a serious amount of self awareness and honesty to be able to notice and realize that in yourself. becoming reasonably skeptical is a process but you've got an excellent head start.
Lol he danced around Timothy questions and statements and deflected the abortion range question with the usual bodily autonomy. And also refused to give a yes or no answer about the conjoined twins along with Forest.
Dave Warnock to Rob... "Rob. Rob! ROB! I asked you a simple yes or no question! Are you really stupid enough to believe in Noah's global flood?"
Here's something horrifying that should keep us all up at night concerning "Rob" from Canada...he's probably allowed to operate a vehicle on public roads!! 😱
A suitable Douglas Adams quote: "Religion…has certain ideas at the heart of it which we call sacred or holy or whatever. That's an idea we're so familiar with, whether we subscribe to it or not, that it's kind of odd to think what it actually means, because really what it means is 'Here is an idea or a notion that you're not allowed to say anything bad about; you're just not. Why not? - because you're not!' If somebody votes for a party that you don't agree with, you're free to argue about it as much as you like; everybody will have an argument but nobody feels aggrieved by it. If somebody thinks taxes should go up or down you are free to have an argument about it, but on the other hand if somebody says 'I mustn't move a light switch on a Saturday', you say, 'Fine, I respect that'... Yet when you look at it rationally there is no reason why those ideas shouldn't be as open to debate as any other, except that we have agreed somehow between us that they shouldn't be.”
Wow Gabe. Welcome to the club, with your humility, seeking to understand, and hunger for knowledge, you’ll be alright. You’ve got a community around you that cares about you and your mental health. I have a similar story and I can relate to the difficulties you spoke about
Rob's call was a roller coaster ride of emotions.
Forrest and Dave are excellent as always
Not even a little bit. This channel should be shut down until atheism is no longer INFAMOUS the world over for having ZERO ANSWERS.
@@neverendingparty1534 go bitch about it somewhere else. What you've said has nothing to do with my initial comment about Forrest and Dave being great. You're just bitching about atheism not having answers when it doesn't claim to, but also it doesn't have to have any answers to just be the correct position. If you have evidence of a god the put it forward because that's the only thing that's going to stop the spread of atheism
@Jon Clark Except I'm not the one w/ a channel, son. This channel should be shut down until atheism is no longer INFAMOUS the world over for having ZERO ANSWERS.
@@neverendingparty1534 I see your backup order of straw was delivered.
@@blarglemantheskeptic The only life God created in his image and gave an eternal soul & spirit, is the human being:
“Then God said, “Let us (Trinity: Father, Word, Holy Spirit) make mankind in our image, in our likeness…” - Genesis 1:26
So the consensus is that the flood was around the 24th century BC, which puts it during the fifth dynasty of egypt. Why is it that if there were a flood, there was a sixth dynasty with no intermittent gap?
China also has a continuous history through that period with no record of a flood.
The people in Europe, Asia, Australia, Africa, India, and North and South America didn't notice this global flood.
What sort of low unethical tactic is that, rageofheaven? I mean... Using proven facts and data to poke holes in a book of bronze age desert nomad mythology just isn't fair!
@@MrShigura I think Noah’s Ark is a minor problem compared to your insane notion that a rock produced the human being.
Noah’s Ark has been proven: Paul Abramson is the flood expert and says there are over 300 legends regarding the flood and over 254 different nations profess the story of the Worldwide Flood. There were no fish or insects & only 8,000 kinds of baby animals on the ark and in the world today (kinds and not species).
It took 120 yrs to build a boat just to float a little while over a LOCAL flood? No. The flood was WORLDWIDE. Fossils are found on every continent. Fossils only form by flood and there are trillions of them. Fossils are formed RAPIDLY, which is why we know the worldwide flood of Noah formed them. Keep in mind that there are no human records older than the time of the flood of 4400 yrs ago.
And where are all the depictions of the dinosaurs living at the same time as humans? If there were civilisations they would have made art and "literature", no depictions of dinosaurs anywhere....
Great show and chemistry between Forrest and Dave. Good job fellas!
Both of you are great additions to this show.
“All those babies were dealing blackjack” LOLOLOLOLOL damn Forrest i was lifting weights when you dropped that line - I could have hurt myself! 😂