At 18:14 you said QxB2 is a move but that will result in a checkmate if you go QxF7 with check. King has to move and you get checkmate by taking the rook at QxE8. Happily correct me if I see it wrong, I'm a beginner
No it don’t work with op Q on f6 and king on f8 or g8, it’s defended sufficiently: QxF7, QxF7, bxF7 and KxF7………. White gave back two pieces, and Nelson said he wanted to keep his pieces. Which is why this doesn’t work. I looked at it myself, too, and found it not worthy of exchange/trades. Despite it not working, he still played with 83.4 accuracy.
@@jonathancauley5345 Thanks for your answer but I just double checked it. My statement is correct and I think you understood wrong what I initially meant. Nelson said that the opponent could move to QxB2 trying to get the rock. And that's when my mentioned checkmate above from white can come in. But only if black makes this mistake and lets this pawn undefended by making that move QxB2.
I love following your thought process when evaluating different moves. I've been watching your videos for a few months now and my puzzle ratings have gone up from 1300 to at one point 1800, to 1712 today. I'm only 1000-1100 rapid though. I struggle to apply the same quality of evaluation in game as in puzzles. At least in game I follow the checks, captures, attacks checklist, but I can't seem to quickly find the best move yet.
24:26 B4+, if white blocks with bishop, sac Bishop with exchange. White must take wit Queen. Then Queen captures B1+, WQueen Blocks, Queens trade, Rook D8+. Track = +4 with 3 pieces of the board
At 16:18, is Rf1 something to consider. It allows the Bishop to escape, but if it does, then Rxf7 seems crushing by white. And if black checks you, the king can run to g1 without blocking the rook.
In the last game, instead of directly capturing the black bishop Kxf2 you could have played Bg5! forcing Qe8+ and THEN Kxf2, threatening both Re1 and Be7, denying black any counter-play whatsoever. (It seemed like you also missed this in your after-game analysis even though the engine actually suggested it.) It has been a very enjoyable series so far, and quite educational to hear your motivations for your moves and pointing out the mistakes of your opponents!
Im same he just passed me lol im studying his thought process, and make principled moves and dont over extended Biggest thing is dont blunder ! I think that alone will get to a 1000 Im using lichess puzzle analysis to show areas I need to improve on
Я осознал что я оказывается очень хороший игрок. Не хватает опыта. Ещё игр 800 и у меня будет 1600 эло, хотя сейчас 850 я расту очень быстро и развиваюсь анализируя каждую игру и ища упущенные возможности. У меня было 600 эло а теперь 850 и почти 900
@@H1st Чем больше эло тем меньше даëтся за победу. Этот факт позволяет моему комментаррию быть полностью логичным. Если ты тратишь по 10 минут на анализ каждой игры в рапид 10 минут возможно оно и так.
@@Foriendlyу, давай посчитаем. У тебя прирост эло за игру в описанном тобой случае (с 800 до 1600) в среднем будет 800/800 = 1 за игру. У меня в моём описанном случае прирост эло будет 500/1000 = 1/2 эло за игру. Насчёт того, что якобы "чем больше рейтинг, тем меньше эло дают за победу", это не так. И с рейтингом 1к и с рейтингом 2к тебе будут давать в среднем 8 эло за победу. Насчёт анализа - да, я сижу и анализирую свои игры, как и ты, и что? Так что в итоге мой комментарий в 2 раза логичнее твоего и в то, что через 800 игр у тебя будет 1600 эло, я верю в 2 раза меньше, чем в то, что через 2к игр я стану мастером. В конце концов, это просто шутка к комменту и если я тебя чем-то оскорбил, то забудь.
@@H1st Да я это сразу понял но лень было искать видео что бы изменить комментарий. Хотел бы узнать именно рапид 10 минут и тратишь на анализ в среднем 10 минут и анализируешь выигранные партии. Всё анализируют свои игры, вопрос лишь как. Если больше 10 минут то ты прав. Если ты играешь не 10+0 тогда тут и сравнивать нечего, анализ 30 минутной или какой либо другой п партии и анализ 10 минутной отличаются ходами и сложностью. Если я в партии вижу новую позицию то я играю лучшие ходы в них и узнаю как в будущем играть эту позицию, трачу на это минут 40. Вроде как всë.
@@shreshth691 of course, you can, it doesn't depend on your opening knowledge. You may not know any opening theory and still win most of your games up until, maybe, 1600.
A situation where you are having both your bishops while your opponent instead have two other minor pieces is generally considered an advantage for you, especially in open positions where the long range of the bishops can be put to good use, since the two bishops complement each other to cover and make threats on both black an white squares. The other side will often have weaknesses on squares of the color of the missing bishop.
These guys resign way to soon. They are in a bad place, but unless you are certain your playing someone on a speed run, they are making the same sort of blunders you are so give it a go, and let them blunder back.
Before watching your vids I was stuck on the low 400s Elo. Learnt some tips and I’m now nearing 600 😁
I rarely see his videos and I climbed from 616 to 1144 elo in blitz in 3 months I mostly see puzzles
@@rrkumar50wow! That’s awesome bud!
Good job!! It always feels good to improve. I went from 550 to 950 blitz recently and it feels great!
I went from 550-1163 because of Nelson and Gotham
I really like these chess climbs. It is so nice that you go slow and explain everything - It is really helping my game.
At 18:14 you said QxB2 is a move but that will result in a checkmate if you go QxF7 with check. King has to move and you get checkmate by taking the rook at QxE8. Happily correct me if I see it wrong, I'm a beginner
Ur absolutely right, Nelson just missed that ig
No it don’t work with op Q on f6 and king on f8 or g8, it’s defended sufficiently: QxF7, QxF7, bxF7 and KxF7………. White gave back two pieces, and Nelson said he wanted to keep his pieces.
Which is why this doesn’t work. I looked at it myself, too, and found it not worthy of exchange/trades. Despite it not working, he still played with 83.4 accuracy.
@@jonathancauley5345 Thanks for your answer but I just double checked it. My statement is correct and I think you understood wrong what I initially meant.
Nelson said that the opponent could move to QxB2 trying to get the rock. And that's when my mentioned checkmate above from white can come in. But only if black makes this mistake and lets this pawn undefended by making that move QxB2.
I love following your thought process when evaluating different moves. I've been watching your videos for a few months now and my puzzle ratings have gone up from 1300 to at one point 1800, to 1712 today. I'm only 1000-1100 rapid though. I struggle to apply the same quality of evaluation in game as in puzzles. At least in game I follow the checks, captures, attacks checklist, but I can't seem to quickly find the best move yet.
Play 30 minute games then (if you have time).
@@Gwennbleidd_Chess 🤷♂️ like why man, why. 30 mins takes way too long.
@@jonathancauley5345beginners should play long games cause they can't calculate faster (I'm a beginner)
at the 10:14 i often use knight takes f7 pawn, in order to lure the king out, so black can't castle anymore.
your face when you saw king to g3 was the best move was priceless lmaoo
I think he was mistaken the engine showed e1 I thought
Congratulations on surpassing 1000elo ❤❤
@chess vibes . love to watch your videos.please make more videos on the specific opening.
your voice and explanation is amazing
This rating climb had been great content keep up the great work I appreciate it
Good matches😁 I do learn by example. Definitely the rooks in the end game are extremely strong. Great vid👍👍
24:26 B4+, if white blocks with bishop, sac Bishop with exchange. White must take wit Queen. Then Queen captures B1+, WQueen Blocks, Queens trade, Rook D8+. Track = +4 with 3 pieces of the board
Maybe Black gave up in 8:32 because the queen would be trapped after rook f1->b1? Am I missing something there?
qa3
nvm youre right
Yea that’s I was thinking, he should’ve played that but he resigned anyways.
@@jeancena3556 the queen would just get taken by your queen?? It is trapped
Queen to A3 would save it
Where is the rest of the video. Like this for the 1 hour long videos on this series.
At 16:18, is Rf1 something to consider. It allows the Bishop to escape, but if it does, then Rxf7 seems crushing by white. And if black checks you, the king can run to g1 without blocking the rook.
Great content, but can you make the rating climb videos longer? This was too short lol
He will as long he doesn’t get any phone calls.
Awesome series thank you
Last game was super sharp and exciting wow
In the last game, instead of directly capturing the black bishop Kxf2 you could have played Bg5! forcing Qe8+ and THEN Kxf2, threatening both Re1 and Be7, denying black any counter-play whatsoever. (It seemed like you also missed this in your after-game analysis even though the engine actually suggested it.)
It has been a very enjoyable series so far, and quite educational to hear your motivations for your moves and pointing out the mistakes of your opponents!
Kg3 on your last match prevents all checks from the black queen. Each check square aside from Qg6 is the only move that black could check on.
16:15. Im terrible...but isnt taking with the pawn good? Avoiding that eventual fork on the bishop?
How did you get higher elo than me in 2 weeks when you started in 200 elo?
This is his 2nd acc in his first account he is a NM with 2300 elo so it's easy for him to beat opponents with 1000 elo
I think he's won something like 110 straight games
Im same he just passed me lol im studying his thought process, and make principled moves and dont over extended
Biggest thing is dont blunder ! I think that alone will get to a 1000
Im using lichess puzzle analysis to show areas I need to improve on
@@russellholloway7465The "Don't Blunder Idea" will get you as far as 1200 or 1300 lol
@@zensvienna9007as a 1700 rated guy I can confirm that if you won't blunder ever, you'll get to 1800 at least 🤭
Against the stafford(according to my engine) you should just accept the gambit and play d3 your just up a pawn
Yeah that’s what I play most of the time. It gets real tough with black having bishop pair but frankly, I’ve won a few games.
Yeah, that's according to engine, according to practice Hikaru struggled against someone 1,5k lower rated in Stafford
Could you play some d4 openings? It'd be nice to add a bit of variety.
the game against Mata-Tan- what happens if rook on F goes to B1?
broo don't reduce the video length !!
Keep it 1 hour long....24 mins is too short!!!!
But the phone rang!
yess waited on this video
Good video.
Nelson, please continue to add puzzles in chess adventure channel..
He will man he isn’t stopping
Naw, the main difference between 1000 and 1500 is in how quickly they resign, not how many mistakes they make.
the moment you stop uploading will probably be the moment i quit chess
No, don't answer that phone! Come back!
if queen takes b2, isn't that checkmate? 18:15
At 21.03 queen to F7 checkmate?
Nelson was in check
play the Caro-Kann next
18:12 Isn't Bd2 fine if Queen takes b7 pawn we have mate in 2
Nope, here’s why: QxF7, QxF7, BxF7 (whites only best move), KxF7. White just given back two pieces.
@@jonathancauley5345Please read the comment again. I said if Q×b7 white has mate in 2
Я осознал что я оказывается очень хороший игрок. Не хватает опыта. Ещё игр 800 и у меня будет 1600 эло, хотя сейчас 850 я расту очень быстро и развиваюсь анализируя каждую игру и ища упущенные возможности.
У меня было 600 эло а теперь 850 и почти 900
По такой логике я через 2к игр буду как минимум международным мастером, сейчас имея 1700 эло 🤣
@@H1st Чем больше эло тем меньше даëтся за победу. Этот факт позволяет моему комментаррию быть полностью логичным. Если ты тратишь по 10 минут на анализ каждой игры в рапид 10 минут возможно оно и так.
@@Foriendlyу, давай посчитаем.
У тебя прирост эло за игру в описанном тобой случае (с 800 до 1600) в среднем будет 800/800 = 1 за игру.
У меня в моём описанном случае прирост эло будет 500/1000 = 1/2 эло за игру.
Насчёт того, что якобы "чем больше рейтинг, тем меньше эло дают за победу", это не так. И с рейтингом 1к и с рейтингом 2к тебе будут давать в среднем 8 эло за победу.
Насчёт анализа - да, я сижу и анализирую свои игры, как и ты, и что?
Так что в итоге мой комментарий в 2 раза логичнее твоего и в то, что через 800 игр у тебя будет 1600 эло, я верю в 2 раза меньше, чем в то, что через 2к игр я стану мастером.
В конце концов, это просто шутка к комменту и если я тебя чем-то оскорбил, то забудь.
@@H1st Да я это сразу понял но лень было искать видео что бы изменить комментарий. Хотел бы узнать именно рапид 10 минут и тратишь на анализ в среднем 10 минут и анализируешь выигранные партии. Всё анализируют свои игры, вопрос лишь как. Если больше 10 минут то ты прав. Если ты играешь не 10+0 тогда тут и сравнивать нечего, анализ 30 минутной или какой либо другой п
партии и анализ 10 минутной отличаются ходами и сложностью. Если я в партии вижу новую позицию то я играю лучшие ходы в них и узнаю как в будущем играть эту позицию, трачу на это минут 40.
Вроде как всë.
As a 1700 elo, would start watching fron the 1500 point
I know every middle game strategy, positional endgame every thing and still found it difficult to defeat 1300 rated player. Please anybody help me.
Just play more games.
Be dedicated, and also play more games
One question can I play well if I know only one opening that is kings pawn opening 🤔
@@shreshth691 of course, you can, it doesn't depend on your opening knowledge. You may not know any opening theory and still win most of your games up until, maybe, 1600.
@@shreshth691 maybe if it good using it, but learn other opening like the sicilian, petrov, learn gambits etc
im about 1300, hope i can play you in the future lol
What is a bishop pair?
A pair of bishops a player has at once.
one pair = two items
e.g one pair of shoes means there are 2 shoes
similarly a pair of bishops means there are 2 bishops
@@avneeshgipm3073 best explanation.
A situation where you are having both your bishops while your opponent instead have two other minor pieces is generally considered an advantage for you, especially in open positions where the long range of the bishops can be put to good use, since the two bishops complement each other to cover and make threats on both black an white squares. The other side will often have weaknesses on squares of the color of the missing bishop.
To surpass 1000 ELO you have to 1. know the rules of chess 2. follow the basic principals 3. think before you move. That's literally all it takes.
Im stuck here
Can you beat Magnus?
I like what I said
Anyone that plays Kg3 in that last game is using an engine.
I've just gotten over 1100, and I'm a bit scared of getting paired with ChessVibes, I'm on the winning streak now:)
Isn’t there mate in 2 at 21:00 Queen to f7 check and then queen to g8. I don’t see a way black can defend. (300 elo here so I might be retarded).
I was wondering the same thing.
And the engine recommends Kg3 😂
Can u please play against Magnus🥺🥺🥺🙏🙏🙏
I like what I said
How's he always getting the white to play?ಠ_ʖಠ
It was a short video this time
These guys resign way to soon. They are in a bad place, but unless you are certain your playing someone on a speed run, they are making the same sort of blunders you are so give it a go, and let them blunder back.
Why MY SUBSCRIBERS ARE NOT INCREASING???
The first!
first
Not you
first like and comment
First comment is mine :)
@@rybasovneither of you are impressive
"Staysharpplaysmarttakecare" 😂🫡