Damage Causation and Remoteness AS
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 พ.ค. 2013
- www.thelawbank.co.uk - A video covering Damage - causation anbd remoteness in the tort of negligence.This video is designed as an introduction to damage mainly for AS - A Level, students. It examines what is meant by the terms damage and also when a loss or injury may be too remote from the act of the defendant.
![ลักพาตัว เอาลูกเอิร์นกลับมา...!! [เอิร์นไดเม่]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/f4NVKlZ5qkk/mqdefault.jpg)
One of the key areas of law for me that makes it so intriguing is the previous cases.The stories offer such a wonderful insight into a very broad range of human experience.
Hahhaha..it’s very funny when you said “look at my spelling this program is awful”.
After watching so many criminal law videos, your ones are the best.Thanks
If the video could generate automatic captions, that would be even more perfect for students who use English as a second language.
Loving these videos
Incredible....wonderfully exlplained!!!
You are welcome Nathalie
Let us know what you get!
Hi do you have any infor about psychiatric damage ( primary and secondary victims) thanks
Thank you from France!
Great Series...
Hi, just wondering if when answering questions relating to claims in negligence (e.g. to advice the claimant); do we have to go through all three elements even if the question is about economic loss or nuisance? Is the starting point always going to be whether the defendant owes the claimant a duty of care and then you just apply other relevant cases? I hope that makes sense!
This is great banter :)
Thank you for the foreseeable part, made so much easier, I was struggling. Here in Australia we call the causation of law, scope of liability its the same dealing with remoteness, multiple sufficient cases and the chain of causation and when it is broken. I find it hard when you have many damages coming from one event for example. It a ship leaked oil out and the fish died from it, the fisherman did not have employment any more. The staff at the two popular restaurants did not have shifts any more as the fish could not be caught, the two restaurants had to be shut down. Is the Ship liable for all this damage? and where is the limit? Thank you for your time, if you want you can sit my exam for me.
amazing lecture, thank you
Hello thank you for your videos. I just have a question about causation. Is proximate cause the same as remoteness. If not where does it fit in
SOOOOOO helpful, thank you!!
Great content 👌
Can someone please explain to me what is meant by REMOTENESS in here please I don't understand it
So clear! Thank you!
Thank you
How can you not forsee a fire risk when welding surrounded by oil which is flammable?
The Defendants were not the ones welding they just caused the oil spill. The defendants are only responsible for any damage that one can expect from a oil spill as this was what they contributed. They could not foresee someone would be welding and the water would catch fire.