Along with the IRS, FBI, CIA, EPA, along with all these 3 letter agencies. Replace them with a New USPD (United States Police Department) with no corruption
Agree, but the USPD should not enforce anything against civilians. Just a federal police unit that weeds out corruption in state and local departments.
As a guy who has suffered hearing loss, I can say it is madness to make owning a suppressor so difficult. They are so useful in reducing noise that can damage hearing... why not encourage them with no stamps and no red tape?
If you ever look into it. In European countries (that actually allow people to shoot guns) actually require suppressors because of how much it helps with protecting hearing
The ATF needs to be reformed into a pro gun ownership and safety agency. They should bring back rifle teams to junior high and high school, teach gun safety, create law suites against any anti American Commi SOB that would oppose gun ownership or suggest any citizen have their gun rights restricted in the tiniest of ways (infringed).
I wouldnt complain if we abolished it as long as its brandon hererra sho gets im there and deletes the infringments and turn it into convienience store that has nothing to do with government agency
JB Pritzker needs to be removed as governor of Illinois. He took our assault weapons away and let in dangerous migrant gangs into Chicago. Absolute fascist.
Brandon would be prefect! I’ve been subscribed to his channel for years. Finally get someone in there that’s pro gun and knows so much about guns! I’m so happy we are going on the right track! It’s gonna be a gun happy 4 years y’all! Get them while you can! I say this being from Illinois. One of the strictest gun states in the country.
Ahhh..., that's 1984, when Ray Gun effed up State MESC Depts, where Employer Contribution rates of 4% AND 400% same thing, instantly bankrupting over 7,000 Businessmen, IRS siced' on 'em, Courts preventing redress, by naming suits, "Taxpayer Protest", directing all courts how to handle, sending in CIA, killing Neighbors & Head's of Accounting Firms. Then piling on huge claims of taxes, never due in 1st place. With even college degree, you'd live like Pauper, as reputation & credit ratings demolished! So, Charlotte, might this be the kind of crapola you may be referring to? If not, you better learn to fear it too!!
Constitutional carry for all, criminal or not. If they deemed you safe to be in society and not locked up, you should have the right to defend yourself and loved ones.
I would agree “Constitutional (no permit required) Carry”. What I would oppose would be a carry permit good for all 50 states. When you are required to carry a document (permit) it is too easy to begin making different rules/laws for each state. I have just seen too many times where the government has the ego of: what I giveth I can take away. I would love to read the history of law fare of the 2A in America. In other words from the time of our founding when there were few restrictions on firearm ownership and carry to the progressive tightening of firearm freedoms over the years. In particular, what prompted the writing of the “National Firearms Act 1934”, who wrote it and what thinking led to the inclusion of certain acts and the exclusion of others. I have read that after Prohibition was repealed the Treasury agents needed another item or act put into law or they would lose their jobs. And that early after NFA 34 voted into law the SCOTUS would rule routinely dismiss cases in the favor of the defendant, as having been born near the end of the 19th century, thought the laws they were hearing from the government solicitors sounded too ridiculous to be true as they defied common sense. But, in those days it took weeks at times for printed new laws to be distributed to all states, counties, territories and courts; unlike the within minutes of information transmitted via internet and ZOOM calls, etc of modern society.
@@taylorsrus9543 “the people” means everybody, not just people in millitias, lol. The people (everybody) has the right to bear arms so anybody can join a militia wherever they want with their own personal equipment because that’s how a militia works, genius.
@@Jake-bt3fc ll of the colonies - apart from Quaker-dominated Pennsylvania, the one colony in which religious pacifists blocked the creation of a militia - enrolled local citizens, white men between the ages of 16-60 in state-regulated militias. The colonies and then the newly independent states kept track of these privately owned weapons required for militia service. Men could be fined if they reported to a muster without a well-maintained weapon in working condition. Jeffersons suggestion was to use the language "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms" Why was that not adopted if gun rights were meant to not be directly tied to military use? Pretty much every state had some form of gun control law that continued to be refined through the early to mid 1800's. The second amendment authors and ratifiers were walking around, why no unconstitutional outcry? You are making up what you think it means to fit your own position. The facts of the day do not support your conclusion.
@@taylorsrus9543 There was "no outcry" over "some form of gun control" while "second amendment authors were still alive" you say? Lmao. what an amazing argument you have there.
Yeah. Well. That dude was the highest ranking official at that airport. Theres way more to this than we will ever know. He was probably complicit and aware and they had to tie up a loose end. That was a straight up hit.
So you mean expanding the gun rights. And yes they cab be expanded. They used to be sword rights bro. Every man a sword for home defense. Then it was single shot musket you said damn a sword is still better after you popped your only shot if youre up close thats why john paul jones carried 4 pistols across his chest it wss only 4 shots before reloading you had to be rich to have 4 guns but to him it was life bro he was battling naval ships deck to deck you needed a lotta pistol esspecially if they were only 1 shot. So yeah they can be expanded. When the military wouldnt advance past bolt action rifles the cowboys made the lever action rifle. They made pistols with 6 chambers before they had magazines. They can certainly be expanded and should be. Need raygun from cod zombies
The smaller the weapon the easier it is to hide, what a brilliant assessment. I mean just imagine smaller, easier to hide. Thank God we have these geniuses working for us and getting paid insane salaries.
@@OrlandoMontes-c7u might want to research recidivism rates before you get too caught up in that one. Just don’t break the law and you have nothing to worry about.
@@wechsler151shall not be infringed. Dont say you believe in the second amendment if you dont agree with what Orlando said wether i agree with it or not is irrelevant.
I support OP. If you serve a sentence, you cant say you are free from Prison until you actually are. Otherwise, you serve a sentence IN and OUT with the OUT being for life.
Yes, i knew a few brothers that bought their own long rifles, one was in Beirut! Yes to keepind a New AR directly from basic, just in the event of need after Honorable Service. It's a parting gift from the US Armed forces. I would have a New AR15A1, but.... the new A2 is so much better, and let's not forget our specops you can keep nvgs, sidearm, choice of SBR and long gun. Semper Fi
Elon Musk just scared the bejeebers out of the RINOs in the House and Senate. He told them that if they didn't stand behind Trump's America First Agenda, he would personally fund the campaigns of any patriotic candidates who decided to primary them in their re-election bids. He said that he didn't care how much it costs in the long run, but that he'll do everything in his power to make sure that they are not re-elected.
Trump please help us in WA state! We are unable to purchase firearms right now because of an “error” with background checks that’s been going on for over 2 weeks now. AR’s and magazines over 10rds are still banned too. Completely UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Clearly not an error. A strategic mass violation of human rights just like the burst pipes and suspicious ballots of votes showing up day after election
I would like to see national CCW reciprocity back on the table. With my combination of MA, NH non-res, ME non-res, and UT non-res, I'm legal in about 40+ states or so, but would love to see the other states covered so I don't have to drive around them whenever I need to travel.
@@MagicJack999 The ATF is not needed, those "bad" people can be handled by being armed and trained. There is a reason why we have the quote "An armed society is a polite society". The ATF, along with 90% of laws out there are unconstitutional, and this is a fact, better to have dangerous freedom than peaceful slavery.
@@MagicJack999 No. There really isn't. "Bad people" are not addressed by crying they have a tube of metal, they're addressed by what they do that is aside from their owning a tube of metal.
The atf is systematically perverting everything the constitution stands for nit only violating the bill of rights but also usurping congress to do it. Making their own taxes and regulations aka laws because the jackboots at the bottom cant even tell what a woman is or how many genders there is. If you so much as seem suspicious in theur own personal determination or dont follow a procedure they already try to act like youre breaking the law. Blind orwellian future
I 100% agree, we need federal country-wide laws related to guns. This issue should not be in individual states jurisdiction. The same should apply to driver licenses and driving rules, the same should apply to abortion.
@jond2458 ammo has gotten much cheaper (9×19 ~$0.20, hunting ammo $30-40) & the selection is approaching prebiden bandwidth. That is my perspective as a dealer. Our weakness today is the powder supply.
*As long as Republicans have less than 60 votes in the Senate (which, at 53 seats, is the situation we're going into), the legislative path is a dead-end. Without 60 votes, they can't invoke **_cloture;_** the process by which filibusters can be shut down during debate over a proposed bill. So the Dems will filibuster any pro-gun legislation and it won't pass the Senate.* *Y'all gonna have to come to the realization the legislative branch is **_NOT_** where we need to place our hope, time, energy, and effort. Whatsoever the legislature giveth, it can taketh away. Let's say you get some piece of pro-gun legislation passed by a pro-gun Congress. What stops it from simply overturning all of that with new laws when the tide turns and the executive and legislative branches revert to Dem control? Answer: nothing! It's a fool's errand to put faith into the legislature when it comes to something as fundamental and critical as our inalienable rights.* *The answer lies, instead, with the judicial branch. Sue to get cases before the Supreme Court while we have conservative justices in the majority. Secure rulings that stand in perpetuity, overruling the anti-gun laws **_du jour_** that the legislature passes to fulfill a particular short-term political agenda.* *We restore our rights by asserting their fundamental inviolability, forcing the government to attempt (and fail) to defend the indefensible in the highest court of the land. We put the **_GOVERNMENT_** on trial before SCOTUS for infringing on our rights, rather than letting the government put guns on trial in the court of public opinion. We don't restore them by going begging and pleading to a fickle, capricious, and self-serving legislature.*
I completely agree, however there is a problem. The next democrat administration will abolish the filibuster entirely and nominate as many anti 2A justices on the court as they see fit ripping the constitution into confetti. What then?
I'll go one better, and say we have to get Clarence Thomas and John Roberts to retire. Not that Thomas Isn't the most based SCJ, which he is, but we have to Dem-proof the USSC for decades and not allow Left Wing idiots who don't understand the US Constitution (Like Sotomeyer and that moron Ketanji Brown Jackson) to be nominated.
@@dougrobinson8602 Agreed. My hope is Alito, Roberts, and Thomas all retire while Trump is in office. I don't know about Roberts; he may hold out, believing himself to represent the centrist moderate view. But Alito and Thomas I could see retiring in Trump's 3rd year to give the President time enough to nominate and have confirmed younger conservative justices to replace them. We can't afford to make the mistake the Dems made with RBG who held on to the bitter end, costing them a seat on the Supreme Court.
@ no I know sir but I feel like anyone who can pass a background check to obtain a license to carry firearms should be allowed to carry anywhere they go because what’s the point of having a license when the places you can carry are very limited.
@@JesusPerez-ux9zw Its cause they use private businesses "rules" as if they were laws, And use those rules to try and convict someone of a felony so they can "legally" confiscate any firearms from that person and even if those charges are dropped it'll take months/years to get any of those guns back and by the time you do get any of them back most of them will probably end up "missing" or were "destroyed" (aka stolen) and you can't do anything about it except move on or they'll try and get you for a harassment charge.
@@JesusPerez-ux9zw Don't know about "feel like"🤡 but I BELIEVE it's up to the citizen, to make enough of an effort to CONCEAL their weapon, so it doesn't draw the attention of mindless sheep.
I dont get how i cant carry my firearm in 90% of nyc and if im caught even with my proper license its a felony but yet these migrants and felons have them all over and they get a slap on the wrost.
I was in the Marines , got out and struggled with addiction . I have a non violent felony drug possession and now can’t own a firearm . I wish them made a law for people with non violent charges to own a firearm . Haven’t been in trouble for 7 years now and it sucks .
he also said he would do a bunch last time... but ended up banning bumpstocks, not taking suppressors off of the ATF list. On the other hand, his SCOTUS picks were amazing.. so I'll remain cautiously optimistic.
If he can deliver on these promises from day 1, it could be a huge win for the 2A community. It’ll be interesting to see if he pushes for any significant changes, like rolling back certain restrictions or advocating for national carry laws.
They aren’t going to mess around! Mr. Trump has thought everything out. It feels great to feel excited again. Appreciate your insight. Our country🇺🇸is in great hands!
You cant just make ammo cheap again. Get rid of the taxes yes. But as far as bringing the base price down i dont see it happening. The cost of living is increasing more and more and the people that make that ammo need to make a living wage.
I am a first timer on your site. I think you’re doing a great job and I think Brandon Herrera will make a great leader of the ATF because the ATF don’t make laws only Congress does and they think they can go above Congress authority to regulate our firearms. It’s wrong at all levels. I support the second amendment wholeheartedly. Great 👍 Job!
Or felons who were convicted 20 years ago but have been living right since. What other rights do we permanently strip? Do we not believe in forgiveness at a certain point? IMO if you were convicted at 20 you shouldn't be denied the ability to effectively defend yourself at 70 so long as it was a one off.
Brandon Herrera? That would be absolutely amazing to see him as atf director. He is one of the top gun guys innthe country. The news with trump keeps getting better and better.
As long as the ATF exists, there will always be problems. Anything undone under Trump can be reinstated and more under the next administration. ATF needs to go. Even under Trump, how much can be undone? Congress approved some of this BS. Do we actually have the senate? I can think of at least 5 RINO's.
This is our golden hour right now. We may not get it again for a long while legislation not executive orders start with executive orders, but follow through with legislation. Otherwise the battles never won. Have to take advantage of the time that we have now. I wish you all peace ✌️🇺🇸
The AR hysteria actually began in the mid 1980s with Ronald Reagan's Firearm Owners Protection Act and the "Machine Gun USA" article published by Newsweek.
*The problem* SBRs, SBSs, and Suppressors are restricted by LAW, not by ATF regulation. The ATF Director cannot 'exempt' any of them from the LAW any more than the ATF Director can change the LAW to ban bumpstocks, FRTs, 80% receivers, or pistol braces. Even Brandon Herrera can't do that. *The solution* 1. Legislation passed by Congress (won't happen) OR 2. A Supreme Court order. What Herrera CAN do, as ATF Director, is sue the government and challenge the NFA, either completely or in part. He could FORCE the matter and get an abbreviated timeline to challenge the laws. He can also rescind ALL ATF 'rules' restricting firearms beyond what is mandated in the LAW.
Your missing the point. The Supreme Court is supposed to determine what is constitutional before a law is passed due to Marbury v Madison which was a hearing that said any law repugnant to the constitution is null and void. They obviously failed to do their jobs back in the early mid 1900’s. This law on these weapons should already be nulled and voided by every court.
Clearly the Director sets the tone from an enforcement perspective. Until such time as the Supreme Court rules on existing legislation, the culture of ATF can surely be shifted.
@@jazzzman1000 That is true, but the Director cannot change law and Trump's director will have only 4 years (maximum). I don't desire a vacation from the ATF, I desire a restoration of our rights.
@@Acuity-1 They aren't. The people in prison for violating them can tell you all about it. The Supreme Court does NOT review ANY law before it is 'passed'. EVER. Never has, never will. What fantasy world are you living in?!?!?! The Supreme Court reviews 70-80 cases per year. Out of about 8000 seeking certiorari. Out of 10s of thousands of laws passed nationwide every year. Most of life's disappointment is caused by unreasonable expectations.
@@Acuity-1 That is why you can't rely on any branch of government to fix it. We have the 2nd amentment. It was totally ignored. We have Heller and Bruen and that's totally ignored. The answer isn't in government, Government IS the problem.
![[#2024MAMA] BIGBANG (빅뱅) - 뱅뱅뱅 (BANG BANG BANG) + FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EQsYfiPR9uM/mqdefault.jpg)
The ATF, Brandon Herrera for ATF Director 2024🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Brandon! Brandon! Brandon! Brandon! Brandon! Brandon!
Brandon! Brandon! Brandon! Brandon! Brandon! Brandon!
Brandon! Brandon! Brandon! Brandon! Brandon! Brandon!
Sorry Madison Cawthorn got the nod this week
@@lylehutchins916 Let’s go Brandon!
I would say ATF Director 2025. I don't see it happening in 2024.
@@Papote44 I agree. He basically got banished from DC because he didn't like the sex and drugs
I would like to see the ATF disband permanently
Along with the IRS, FBI, CIA, EPA, along with all these 3 letter agencies. Replace them with a
New USPD (United States Police Department) with no corruption
Defund the ATF immediately. Refund all state carry permits immediately. The second ammendment protects the people from government infringement.
Change the BATF to Brandon's Alcohol Tasting Federation
Agree, but the USPD should not enforce anything against civilians. Just a federal police unit that weeds out corruption in state and local departments.
Make ATF gone again.
@@bald_chicken As well as the Office of Gun Violence a d Red Flag etc.....
🤣 yes!!
Along with the NFA
Not before the FBI though. Or the FBI will take over their duties....
Would this be MATFGA?
As a guy who has suffered hearing loss, I can say it is madness to make owning a suppressor so difficult. They are so useful in reducing noise that can damage hearing... why not encourage them with no stamps and no red tape?
If you ever look into it. In European countries (that actually allow people to shoot guns) actually require suppressors because of how much it helps with protecting hearing
They have convinced people that suppressors eliminate all noise from gunfire when in reality it only works as much as a muffler on a car does.
Law abiding citizens do not need the ATF.
Nobody needs the ATF. It shouldn’t have ever been allowed to exist.
Unless it's actually a convenience store!
Criminals do not fear the ATF.
The ATF needs to be reformed into a pro gun ownership and safety agency. They should bring back rifle teams to junior high and high school, teach gun safety, create law suites against any anti American Commi SOB that would oppose gun ownership or suggest any citizen have their gun rights restricted in the tiniest of ways (infringed).
We DO need ATF, as long as it's Automatic Transmission Fluid!
Thank God we got TRUMP in. I agree Brandon Herrera as ATF Director.
The ATF needs to be abolished.
I wouldnt complain if we abolished it as long as its brandon hererra sho gets im there and deletes the infringments and turn it into convienience store that has nothing to do with government agency
JB Pritzker needs to be removed as governor of Illinois. He took our assault weapons away and let in dangerous migrant gangs into Chicago. Absolute fascist.
Not abolished, just changed into what it should have always been. A one stop shop, the Big Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Store.
There should be a lateral transfer of ATF personnel over to an expanding US Border Patrol and ICE.
If we got rid of the ATF tomorrow... the FBI would immediately take over what the ATF does. See the problem?
Brandon would be prefect! I’ve been subscribed to his channel for years. Finally get someone in there that’s pro gun and knows so much about guns! I’m so happy we are going on the right track! It’s gonna be a gun happy 4 years y’all! Get them while you can! I say this being from Illinois. One of the strictest gun states in the country.
When a citizen has greater fear of their own government then from abroad, there is some thing really messed up.👀
This is the government the second amendment warned you about.
Ahhh..., that's 1984, when Ray Gun effed up State MESC Depts, where Employer Contribution rates of 4% AND 400% same thing, instantly bankrupting over 7,000 Businessmen, IRS siced' on 'em, Courts preventing redress, by naming suits, "Taxpayer Protest", directing all courts how to handle, sending in CIA, killing Neighbors & Head's of Accounting Firms. Then piling on huge claims of taxes, never due in 1st place. With even college degree, you'd live like Pauper, as reputation & credit ratings demolished! So, Charlotte, might this be the kind of crapola you may be referring to? If not, you better learn to fear it too!!
Very true!
@@NerotiqueThat's why the 2d Amendment was written and adopted.
I would argue when citizens fear each other more than thier government something is wrong
Constitutional carry for all, criminal or not. If they deemed you safe to be in society and not locked up, you should have the right to defend yourself and loved ones.
I would agree “Constitutional (no permit required) Carry”. What I would oppose would be a carry permit good for all 50 states. When you are required to carry a document (permit) it is too easy to begin making different rules/laws for each state. I have just seen too many times where the government has the ego of: what I giveth I can take away. I would love to read the history of law fare of the 2A in America. In other words from the time of our founding when there were few restrictions on firearm ownership and carry to the progressive tightening of firearm freedoms over the years. In particular, what prompted the writing of the “National Firearms Act 1934”, who wrote it and what thinking led to the inclusion of certain acts and the exclusion of others. I have read that after Prohibition was repealed the Treasury agents needed another item or act put into law or they would lose their jobs. And that early after NFA 34 voted into law the SCOTUS would rule routinely dismiss cases in the favor of the defendant, as having been born near the end of the 19th century, thought the laws they were hearing from the government solicitors sounded too ridiculous to be true as they defied common sense. But, in those days it took weeks at times for printed new laws to be distributed to all states, counties, territories and courts; unlike the within minutes of information transmitted via internet and ZOOM calls, etc of modern society.
@@slypperyfox Man i remember writing long comments like this till i realized 99% of them were only visible on my account.
Restoring, not expanding our gun rights.
Shall not be infringed. Can't get more expanse than that
@@logangodofcandy What well regulated militia are you in?
@@taylorsrus9543 “the people” means everybody, not just people in millitias, lol.
The people (everybody) has the right to bear arms so anybody can join a militia wherever they want with their own personal equipment because that’s how a militia works, genius.
@@Jake-bt3fc ll of the colonies - apart from Quaker-dominated Pennsylvania, the one colony in which religious pacifists blocked the creation of a militia - enrolled local citizens, white men between the ages of 16-60 in state-regulated militias. The colonies and then the newly independent states kept track of these privately owned weapons required for militia service. Men could be fined if they reported to a muster without a well-maintained weapon in working condition. Jeffersons suggestion was to use the language "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms" Why was that not adopted if gun rights were meant to not be directly tied to military use? Pretty much every state had some form of gun control law that continued to be refined through the early to mid 1800's. The second amendment authors and ratifiers were walking around, why no unconstitutional outcry? You are making up what you think it means to fit your own position. The facts of the day do not support your conclusion.
@@taylorsrus9543 There was "no outcry" over "some form of gun control" while "second amendment authors were still alive" you say? Lmao. what an amazing argument you have there.
Brian milomowski did not need to die. ATF killed him in a night raid that was not necessary. They could have picked him up at his office. Shame!!!!!
Trump and gaetz should turn all invokved over to the state of arkansas for murder charges
They want us afraid!
Yeah. Well. That dude was the highest ranking official at that airport. Theres way more to this than we will ever know. He was probably complicit and aware and they had to tie up a loose end. That was a straight up hit.
My reply was removed, as per usual!
They want us afraid!
@ yuppp. They want you censored.
Funny that you mention it..State of Illinois shut down my favorite gun shop a few years ago.
Illinois is absolutely ass backwards.
The unemployment line is gonna have a lot of former government beaurocrats come January. Can't wait.
All we can do is hope!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣quite the opposite.....
I seriously doubt that, but I hope you are correct.
Learn to code 😂
They'll be fine. They will be cozy in their multiple properties bought with tax payers $$$ they laundered
"It needs to be simple language"..... like Shall NOT be infringed????
May I phrase it differently. Our gun Rights cannot be expanded. They are absolute. All we can do is continue to remove infringements.
So you mean expanding the gun rights. And yes they cab be expanded. They used to be sword rights bro. Every man a sword for home defense. Then it was single shot musket you said damn a sword is still better after you popped your only shot if youre up close thats why john paul jones carried 4 pistols across his chest it wss only 4 shots before reloading you had to be rich to have 4 guns but to him it was life bro he was battling naval ships deck to deck you needed a lotta pistol esspecially if they were only 1 shot. So yeah they can be expanded. When the military wouldnt advance past bolt action rifles the cowboys made the lever action rifle. They made pistols with 6 chambers before they had magazines. They can certainly be expanded and should be. Need raygun from cod zombies
@@TheAnnoyingBoss semi auto firearms existed when the 2nd amendment was written. Wat are u on about? 🤣😅
@@TheAnnoyingBoss nothing you said was correct.
@TheAnnoyingBoss Tell me you have no idea what the Second Amendment is without telling me you don't know what it is
@@woottasticlol I guess his username checks out 😂
The smaller the weapon the easier it is to hide, what a brilliant assessment. I mean just imagine smaller, easier to hide. Thank God we have these geniuses working for us and getting paid insane salaries.
Shall not be infringed is the only law acceptable. ZERO permits is a perfect start.
Exactly
NO PERMISSION SLIPS!!!! 🤘🤘🤘
Cant imagine complying with paying for your rights.
Thank you from Texas. Plato Republic
How about no ATF at all?...they have never protected me or my Rights ever
🤣🤣🤣🤣haven't you figured out the circus yet???
It's a fact that atf has caused more gun deaths than they have prevented.
Didn’t the ATF murder a couple people at Ruby Ridge and then again murdered women and children at Waco?
Hope he makes it legal for felons who have completed their sentence get their rights to protect their families as well as themselves
@@OrlandoMontes-c7u might want to research recidivism rates before you get too caught up in that one. Just don’t break the law and you have nothing to worry about.
@@wechsler151shall not be infringed. Dont say you believe in the second amendment if you dont agree with what Orlando said wether i agree with it or not is irrelevant.
I support OP. If you serve a sentence, you cant say you are free from Prison until you actually are. Otherwise, you serve a sentence IN and OUT with the OUT being for life.
Give the vets their 2A rights back
Right, should be allowed to keep their services weapons on there departure instead of sold to countries that we are going to end up fighting.....
Yes, i knew a few brothers that bought their own long rifles, one was in Beirut!
Yes to keepind a New AR directly from basic, just in the event of need after Honorable Service. It's a parting gift from the US Armed forces. I would have a New AR15A1, but.... the new A2 is so much better, and let's not forget our specops you can keep nvgs, sidearm, choice of SBR and long gun.
Semper Fi
Keep the VA out of our business as well they have taken so many veterans gun rights away by simply typing it into the computer.
@@sbagwell98 no branch of the service uses an AR, a marine should know that.....
@@Greg1096glad you caught that.
Wow
RETIRED LT.COLONEL ALLEN WEST
FOR ATF Director 🇺🇸
Not expand gun rights.... just removes all the past infringements!
Great video !!! Brand Herrera would be great for the job
Eliminate tax stamps!
Maura Healy of Massachusetts. Gavin Newsome of California. Kathy Hochol of New York. Prikster of Illinois. And yes the ATF! All need to go!
Well said, right on.
Elon Musk just scared the bejeebers out of the RINOs in the House and Senate. He told them that if they didn't stand behind Trump's America First Agenda, he would personally fund the campaigns of any patriotic candidates who decided to primary them in their re-election bids. He said that he didn't care how much it costs in the long run, but that he'll do everything in his power to make sure that they are not re-elected.
Happy someone finally gets the smelling of our dear leaders name right!
NYers say send help!!!
Healy is a complete tyrant here in massachusetts
A “Hearing protection act” needs to remove the tax and application for suppressors
Trump please help us in WA state! We are unable to purchase firearms right now because of an “error” with background checks that’s been going on for over 2 weeks now. AR’s and magazines over 10rds are still banned too. Completely UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
And when you’re done with WA state please save our souls in New York
Clearly not an error. A strategic mass violation of human rights just like the burst pipes and suspicious ballots of votes showing up day after election
Wow😮
Trump has not been inaugurated yet. Biden is still the POTUS.
That's what life is like in democratic states
Brandon Herrera for ATF!
He said it wouldn't walk right after he was finished with it!
They need hire Brandon Herrera as the ATF director! What do y’all think
100% agree.
Colion Noir?
Larry Pratt from GOA.
Brandon for sure. Dude is a bald eagle!!
Yessss😂
The fact that they found part of a "destroyed" firearm on the street being used by a criminal says it all.
Turn the ATF into a national corner store where you can buy (Alcohol, tobacco, and Firearms) 😂👍🏼
I'd apply for a credit card on day one!
😅
😂😂😂😂
@@blicce9597 in florida we have a gas station you can get gas and diesel. Hi octane. Red bull. Smokes. A burrito and a glock all in one stop. Winning.
😂😂😂 😊
I would like to see national CCW reciprocity back on the table. With my combination of MA, NH non-res, ME non-res, and UT non-res, I'm legal in about 40+ states or so, but would love to see the other states covered so I don't have to drive around them whenever I need to travel.
Brandon Herrera for ATF Director.
How about no one for ATF Director? Disband it all together.
@@jimf.1318 there are bad people out there the atf is needed but not with a bad director
@@MagicJack999 The ATF is not needed, those "bad" people can be handled by being armed and trained. There is a reason why we have the quote "An armed society is a polite society".
The ATF, along with 90% of laws out there are unconstitutional, and this is a fact, better to have dangerous freedom than peaceful slavery.
@@MagicJack999 No. There really isn't. "Bad people" are not addressed by crying they have a tube of metal, they're addressed by what they do that is aside from their owning a tube of metal.
Brandon Herrera for ATF Director?
Best thing I've heard in a long time.👍
We need to get the “F” out of the ATF.
and the t
and the a
And what was the Whiskey Rebellion about?
Taxing a man's whiskey, cigars and guns is illegal.
The atf is systematically perverting everything the constitution stands for nit only violating the bill of rights but also usurping congress to do it. Making their own taxes and regulations aka laws because the jackboots at the bottom cant even tell what a woman is or how many genders there is. If you so much as seem suspicious in theur own personal determination or dont follow a procedure they already try to act like youre breaking the law. Blind orwellian future
@@_Concerned_Citizen_ They were never about AT, just F, it was the plan the whole time.
But you think alcohol & tobacco still need regulation? You're so very misguided.
Federal 50 state conceal carry!!! Great option for people that travel and or work fifty states. For instance truck drivers working at least 48 states.
I 100% agree, we need federal country-wide laws related to guns. This issue should not be in individual states jurisdiction. The same should apply to driver licenses and driving rules, the same should apply to abortion.
We should just stay with Shall not be infringed
People dont want to gave to gear up for war but its better to be a warrior in a garden than a gardener in a war
It needs to be changed to "Will NEVER be infringed"
The people should be able to have what their hardworking labor paid for.
Please make ammo affordable again! Oh yea, and do something about the atf
@jond2458 ammo has gotten much cheaper (9×19 ~$0.20, hunting ammo $30-40) & the selection is approaching prebiden bandwidth. That is my perspective as a dealer. Our weakness today is the powder supply.
Brandon Herrera for ATF Director let’s go y’all
Firearms For Freedom! 2A All The Way!!!
2a is speartip of freedom
CARs. Have. Killed. More people in past 50 years. Than AR - 15. Have. Atf. Has. Killed more. Unarmed. People. Than. AR - 15. To
@ Amen!!!!!
Why have an ATF director if you're going to abolish it?
I'm in California so I think Newsom is the most anti gun politician
I absolutely agree
Michael Bloomberg trumps him, by far.
Maura Healy
@@tomg3903 and so is his right hand man AG Rob Bonta
I agree
Good job. Good info. Thank you!
*As long as Republicans have less than 60 votes in the Senate (which, at 53 seats, is the situation we're going into), the legislative path is a dead-end. Without 60 votes, they can't invoke **_cloture;_** the process by which filibusters can be shut down during debate over a proposed bill. So the Dems will filibuster any pro-gun legislation and it won't pass the Senate.*
*Y'all gonna have to come to the realization the legislative branch is **_NOT_** where we need to place our hope, time, energy, and effort. Whatsoever the legislature giveth, it can taketh away. Let's say you get some piece of pro-gun legislation passed by a pro-gun Congress. What stops it from simply overturning all of that with new laws when the tide turns and the executive and legislative branches revert to Dem control? Answer: nothing! It's a fool's errand to put faith into the legislature when it comes to something as fundamental and critical as our inalienable rights.*
*The answer lies, instead, with the judicial branch. Sue to get cases before the Supreme Court while we have conservative justices in the majority. Secure rulings that stand in perpetuity, overruling the anti-gun laws **_du jour_** that the legislature passes to fulfill a particular short-term political agenda.*
*We restore our rights by asserting their fundamental inviolability, forcing the government to attempt (and fail) to defend the indefensible in the highest court of the land. We put the **_GOVERNMENT_** on trial before SCOTUS for infringing on our rights, rather than letting the government put guns on trial in the court of public opinion. We don't restore them by going begging and pleading to a fickle, capricious, and self-serving legislature.*
I completely agree, however there is a problem. The next democrat administration will abolish the filibuster entirely and nominate as many anti 2A justices on the court as they see fit ripping the constitution into confetti. What then?
"Ddduuuhh my false idol is in office now we're all saved"🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
I'll go one better, and say we have to get Clarence Thomas and John Roberts to retire. Not that Thomas Isn't the most based SCJ, which he is, but we have to Dem-proof the USSC for decades and not allow Left Wing idiots who don't understand the US Constitution (Like Sotomeyer and that moron Ketanji Brown Jackson) to be nominated.
@@JohnDoe-zl6qw Very articulate opinion Mr Doe.
Thanks for posting, and keep spreading the good word 🇺🇸
@@dougrobinson8602 Agreed. My hope is Alito, Roberts, and Thomas all retire while Trump is in office. I don't know about Roberts; he may hold out, believing himself to represent the centrist moderate view.
But Alito and Thomas I could see retiring in Trump's 3rd year to give the President time enough to nominate and have confirmed younger conservative justices to replace them.
We can't afford to make the mistake the Dems made with RBG who held on to the bitter end, costing them a seat on the Supreme Court.
ATF should be a convenience store, not a government agency!
What good is it to have a license to carry if the places where you can legally carry are very limited
They call it concealed carry for a reason, hoss.
@ no I know sir but I feel like anyone who can pass a background check to obtain a license to carry firearms should be allowed to carry anywhere they go because what’s the point of having a license when the places you can carry are very limited.
@@JesusPerez-ux9zw Its cause they use private businesses "rules" as if they were laws, And use those rules to try and convict someone of a felony so they can "legally" confiscate any firearms from that person and even if those charges are dropped it'll take months/years to get any of those guns back and by the time you do get any of them back most of them will probably end up "missing" or were "destroyed" (aka stolen) and you can't do anything about it except move on or they'll try and get you for a harassment charge.
@@fintherebel5000 !!! *Alert Theme*
@@JesusPerez-ux9zw Don't know about "feel like"🤡 but I BELIEVE it's up to the citizen, to make enough of an effort to CONCEAL their weapon, so it doesn't draw the attention of mindless sheep.
Best thing I’ve heard in many many years !!!
Brandon would also be awesome as director. But honestly I’d rather see the BATFE abolished !!!
BRANDON HERRERA FOR ATF DIRECTOR!!!!!!!!!!!
❤
I dont get how i cant carry my firearm in 90% of nyc and if im caught even with my proper license its a felony but yet these migrants and felons have them all over and they get a slap on the wrost.
We’re finally repealing the NFA 🗣️🔥
Bryan Terry border patrol .Killed by Erick Holder !
And no one was held accountable
I was in the Marines , got out and struggled with addiction . I have a non violent felony drug possession and now can’t own a firearm . I wish them made a law for people with non violent charges to own a firearm . Haven’t been in trouble for 7 years now and it sucks .
RFK has a website for US citizens to make recommendations for key positions. I put my vote in for Brandon Herrerra, I advise others to do the same!🇺🇸
Can you post a link? I'd sign that!🇺🇲🍻
And eric holder was never held in contempt for not showing up to his supbeana!
LETS GO BRANDON ! HES GOT MY VOTE ! COLION AS BACK UP!
Cool video thanks. ATF AGREED.
Promises Made Promises Kept
🍿
he also said he would do a bunch last time... but ended up banning bumpstocks, not taking suppressors off of the ATF list. On the other hand, his SCOTUS picks were amazing.. so I'll remain cautiously optimistic.
Herrera needs to be hired as director nuff said
Colion Noir would be a good pick as well as ATF Director.
Build your own never register. God bless America and Donald Trump.
Thanks for the information 👍
If he can deliver on these promises from day 1, it could be a huge win for the 2A community. It’ll be interesting to see if he pushes for any significant changes, like rolling back certain restrictions or advocating for national carry laws.
@@AllAboutSurvival a part of his agenda 47, he's going to require all statrs to honor eachother's CCWL, California will have no choice but to honor it
Make America Full-Auto again 💪
And Brian Terry in Arizona was killed by a cartel member who had a fast and furious weapon.
Dude, I'm 5 min in and still haven't heard about what is in the title. You talking is not why I clicked
Fast and furious was a STUPID idea
It did exactly what it was designed to do!
ATF was a STUPID idea
the dnc was a stupid idea
@@jacob.tudragens The system does what the system does.
Was there ANYTHING Obama did that wasn't stupid or tyrannical? I can't think of any.
Free the suppressor
Matt Geatz for attorney General 2024 !!!!!
I’m hoping our CCW license will be able to be honored in all states. I enjoy travel, however will not do so if I don’t feel safe without protection.
Brandon would be a GREAT ATF DIRECTOR
Im pretty sure he would just abolish the entire department on day 1. No need to direct something that shouldn't have existed in the first place.
Guns all over the place and nobody has the balls to use em. Kinda odd. For a nation that brags so dang much about being great again.
They aren’t going to mess around! Mr. Trump has thought everything out. It feels great to feel excited again. Appreciate your insight. Our country🇺🇸is in great hands!
With Trump, let's wait and see!!
Enemy of gun owners, gun rights and the 2nd Amendment? Easy, the ATF. As Johnny B says, the ATF is GAAAAAAYYYYYYYYY! 😂😂
ATF = VERY GAY
I love people that argue for keeping the ring, because they think they can wield it
I don't see it as a 2A rights expansion but rather, a restoration. JMO.
That ain't JYO, it is fact under 2A. We don't need no stinking permission slips!!
Lower the ammo prices to 2017 prices 😂
National reciprocity for one thing, then getting rid of the ATF, no more bans on braces or bumps (insane). And make ammo cheap again.
You cant just make ammo cheap again. Get rid of the taxes yes. But as far as bringing the base price down i dont see it happening. The cost of living is increasing more and more and the people that make that ammo need to make a living wage.
I am a first timer on your site. I think you’re doing a great job and I think Brandon Herrera will make a great leader of the ATF because the ATF don’t make laws only Congress does and they think they can go above Congress authority to regulate our firearms. It’s wrong at all levels. I support the second amendment wholeheartedly. Great 👍 Job!
Fix the nonviolent felons not being able to have firearms this nonsense needs to be addressed
Follow the Range case. It is at the Supreme Court now.
@@debbievines9872 haven't heard anything about it. How and where to search for more information. Thanks in advance. 🤸♂️🎈
@debbievines9872 the Garland vs Range case was kicked back to a lower court by the Supreme Court
Or felons who were convicted 20 years ago but have been living right since. What other rights do we permanently strip? Do we not believe in forgiveness at a certain point? IMO if you were convicted at 20 you shouldn't be denied the ability to effectively defend yourself at 70 so long as it was a one off.
Nah just cuz your non violent doesn’t mean your non dumb !
Brandon Herrera? That would be absolutely amazing to see him as atf director. He is one of the top gun guys innthe country. The news with trump keeps getting better and better.
The EU, China, United Nations, California, New York, Illinois, Maryland, any sanctuary state.
Detledick knows nothing about guns!😢 Brandon Hear👂ara for ATF director!
I think that Brandon would be a great person to take over the ATF directors position
Brandon Herrera for ATF director. It would be so great to just watch from his POV as he walks in that office on his first day.
As long as the ATF exists, there will always be problems. Anything undone under Trump can be reinstated and more under the next administration. ATF needs to go. Even under Trump, how much can be undone? Congress approved some of this BS. Do we actually have the senate? I can think of at least 5 RINO's.
@garyh1449 can loss 4 votes with Vance being tie breaker
This is our golden hour right now. We may not get it again for a long while legislation not executive orders start with executive orders, but follow through with legislation. Otherwise the battles never won. Have to take advantage of the time that we have now.
I wish you all peace ✌️🇺🇸
Brandon Herrera ALL DAY LONG For ATF Director! ALL DAY LONG.
The AR hysteria actually began in the mid 1980s with Ronald Reagan's Firearm Owners Protection Act and the "Machine Gun USA" article published by Newsweek.
How amazing would it be if the ATF was actually taking steps to protect gun rights instead of continuously trying to strip them away?
Theyd lose 200 tax stamp income left and right left and right. A lotta money for a few pesky americans human rights?
@TheAnnoyingBoss it's all fake anyway.
If Brandon Herrera becomes atf director the atf will only be after real criminals. Would be so freaking amazing.
ATF definitely needs more inspectors & FFL checks 📂 . There are a lot of problems, fraud. Even NSSF says ATF can see improvement.
Brandon Herrera is to the ATF as Kamala Harris is to the Border Czar LOL It's gonna be so lit
I'll believe it when i see it.
Remove the Massachusetts governor Maura Healey.
Loved your work, and agree with you..
*The problem*
SBRs, SBSs, and Suppressors are restricted by LAW, not by ATF regulation. The ATF Director cannot 'exempt' any of them from the LAW any more than the ATF Director can change the LAW to ban bumpstocks, FRTs, 80% receivers, or pistol braces.
Even Brandon Herrera can't do that.
*The solution*
1. Legislation passed by Congress (won't happen)
OR
2. A Supreme Court order.
What Herrera CAN do, as ATF Director, is sue the government and challenge the NFA, either completely or in part. He could FORCE the matter and get an abbreviated timeline to challenge the laws.
He can also rescind ALL ATF 'rules' restricting firearms beyond what is mandated in the LAW.
Your missing the point. The Supreme Court is supposed to determine what is constitutional before a law is passed due to Marbury v Madison which was a hearing that said any law repugnant to the constitution is null and void. They obviously failed to do their jobs back in the early mid 1900’s.
This law on these weapons should already be nulled and voided by every court.
Clearly the Director sets the tone from an enforcement perspective. Until such time as the Supreme Court rules on existing legislation, the culture of ATF can surely be shifted.
@@jazzzman1000 That is true, but the Director cannot change law and Trump's director will have only 4 years (maximum). I don't desire a vacation from the ATF, I desire a restoration of our rights.
@@Acuity-1 They aren't. The people in prison for violating them can tell you all about it.
The Supreme Court does NOT review ANY law before it is 'passed'. EVER. Never has, never will. What fantasy world are you living in?!?!?!
The Supreme Court reviews 70-80 cases per year. Out of about 8000 seeking certiorari. Out of 10s of thousands of laws passed nationwide every year.
Most of life's disappointment is caused by unreasonable expectations.
@@Acuity-1 That is why you can't rely on any branch of government to fix it. We have the 2nd amentment. It was totally ignored. We have Heller and Bruen and that's totally ignored. The answer isn't in government, Government IS the problem.