Physicist Experiments With Blind People That Can See | Extra-Ocular Vision | Dr. Alex Gomez Marin
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.พ. 2025
- Watch the full interview with Dr.Alex Gomez Marin here: • Blind Man Sees: Consci...
Neuroscientist and physicist Marin describes his research on extra ocular vision: the ability people seem to have to perceive images without their eyes. Whilst his work is scientifically rigorous, taking phenomena like these seriously, is still controversial in academia.
![แค่บอก - Atom ชนกันต์ [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kgwhtg8bAxY/mqdefault.jpg)
Fantastic, wonderful conversation. So good to see this brilliant, compelling thinker talk to you.
Greetings Alex.... my science background is in radiation oncology and computer systems. While I know these types of studies are not popular amongst your peers, please continue your important research. We need highly intelligent and courageous thinkers to find the truth, however it shows itself. I always tell lay people that each of us and the universe is based on quantum field theory. Subsequently in the standard model of physics we are quantum fields. Quantum fields provide for a possible model to study to see if we can find experimental truth.
Best wishes
I had a NDE also. It changed me dramatically. The way people dismiss me when I explain we are all connected and love is the glue that binds us. Thoughts have the ability to change our world. They dismiss me and choose to live in misery.
... there is a psychic war going on. Watch for the inversion. Love for others is the way we should be, but love for the self is being promulgated.
I could go on and on, but i won't
best of luck to you
Brilliant interview. Thank you so much. Regarding the world 'keeps spinning like before' - totally agree, and at the same time with acknowledging that all is connected we become creators. So let's create a more compassionate, peaceful and loving world.
Wow, I love this guy. The way he explained sceptical colleagues, from the anecdotes through to the irrefutable meta-studies data is what I’m living right now. But the evidence continues to mount, and I loved the closing statement, consciousness is going to evolve regardless.
Science progresses one funeral at a time.
You are not wasting your time Alex, keep it going. ❤
Someday (if not already), your work and commitment will be given the recognition it deserves - a paradigm shift in understanding consciousness is on the horizon. Enjoy yourself!
I'm not a physicalist by any means but I think a demonstration with good protocols would be very beneficial.
The Alexandria Project.
th-cam.com/video/Q0QZTwpCAFo/w-d-xo.html
I love Dr. Marin's enthusiasm and courage. I wish there were more scientists like him. I hope he has a wonderful career, despite the cynics/skeptics.
Thank god for people like Alex with truly open minds and unbiased viewpoints. So refreshing!
“The evolution of consciousness has its own arc.”
Awesome 👏🏻
I can feel that Dr Alex is extremly passionated!
I don't find this difficult to believe at all. There are documented cases of people blind from birth who see in 360 degree, ultra-clear vision during an NDE (Mindsight, by Kenneth Ring). If you can see clearly without eyes (which have never worked) after you are clinically dead, why couldn't you do it while alive?
You are very well informed so am I. Daily listen to and reading information like this. It’s now waiting and hoping that more and more people will discover this insight too. And from the moment that the money flow in science and the world will change more to this insight , we create a sphere of light on earth. 👍
id bcz 99.9% ofthe time if ur blind from birth u can never see as the visual cortex can't form? so why talk about it? to gve the blind false hope? studying it is great but I still will keep this to myself lol
@@JohanDeMeyereIf there is actually any kind of this with reliable prove plus did they experience color and are they able to describe their experience correctly, that would be amazing. I also studied physics, but still am a believer, but never heared of something like this.
@@Thor_Asgard_ You will have to read a lot for yourself. I found it too in books about NDE’s written by the researchers / doctors . They describe casestudy’s. And an other field is about out of body experience. Some are born with the natural option to do it. TH-cam showed me a podcast about a scientist. She is doing experiments with some of these people. It’s a beginning to get open for the possibility that it exist and do the experiments . But don’t forget for years scientist did already experiments. But the problem is that mainstream science will not accept the idea that it is possible. So maybe we have to wait for a change in this first. And that begins with more and more new young scientists doing research.
When you are in eternity, recalling each memory is the same as being in that place. Time no longer flows its a static picture.
Have you ever felt that if you die quickly nothing changes your conciousness just shifts to another possibility
why can't I give 3 or 5 thmubs up? so amazing!!!
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I appreciate the discussion. While I have wisdom, I sometimes struggle with communication, so it's refreshing to hear someone articulate this topic so well-especially as it relates to the Age of Aquarius and humanity's evolution.
Beloved Dr. Alex and Essentia Foundation, I am so profoundly grateful to you and the full version of this video that was published some months ago. I consult my intuition regularly with a clairvoiant technique I learned in 2014. After watching your video I decided to ask the intuition (on the 8th September 2024) with that same technique, if I should start consulting it in a different way - in a precognitive way: instead of perceiving the answers by touching papers with several themes, since 14th September 2024, I started to connect with each theme at a distance and, after that, alleatory chosing each paper (folded), without knowing which theme it is. The results are now even better, perhaps also because of previous training, but I notice less interference from me! Your work is brilliant. Infinite Blessings to you, Essentia Foundation and your projects.
Alex you are a rockstar! Thank you for being you and putting a smile on the face of a kindred soul.
I don't know or understand much about physics, but from what I do know, they seem to be making good progress in some areas, but they're all over the place lately and barely inching forward on the big questions.
It seems to me that there is clearly enough evidence in many nontraditional fields to give them some serious time and resources to see where they might lead and what new insights and directions they may lead to.
Keep going, man!
I'm preferential to the term "mind-sight". If you're ever lucky enough to experience a variant of it, odds are you'll feel this strange sense of that you're not seeing but "thinking" it. It's as if the imagery is a concept rather than a visual, but it's kinda both. It's very obvious to you at the time that it's NOT sight. That it's something else, like information getting into your mind and your mind trying its best to claim it as an image.
Personal anecdote, Dr. Marin: when I go to bed in a very dark room, I can perceive my arms and areas of the room behind my closed or blindfolded eyes. The images are blurry but there is no doubt that I'm "seeing" through closed eyes. I used to think it was something akin to those vision phenomenon where the eyes still see an image after having focused our eyes on an object but this is different. Still, for a stronger anecdote, I have to try to see things I've never seen before.
Let's explore this fascinating convergence at zero and how it helps resolve paradoxes.
First, consider how all number types meet at zero:
Complex numbers (a + bi) become just 0 when both a and b are 0
Real numbers on the number line pass through 0
Imaginary numbers (bi) become 0 when b is 0
Transcendental numbers like π - π or e - e reduce to 0
This unique property of zero as a convergence point helps us understand several paradoxes:
Zeno's Dichotomy Paradox: Starting from 0D monads building up to motion (Leibniz's approach) rather than trying to divide motion down into infinite points (Zeno's approach) resolves the apparent impossibility of motion. When we start from 0D, motion emerges naturally as actualization of potential rather than an infinite sum of static points.
Quantum Measurement: The collapse of quantum superposition becomes more intuitive when viewed through the lens of 0D-3D. Instead of a sudden, mysterious collapse from many possibilities to one actuality, we can understand it as the actualization of potential states that all converge at/emerge from 0. This matches better with quantum field theory where particles emerge from the quantum vacuum (a kind of 0-state).
Russell's Set Paradox: The set that contains all sets that don't contain themselves creates a contradiction in classical logic. But if we start from 0D and build up, using degrees of belonging rather than binary membership, the paradox transforms into a description of self-reference and emergence. Just as all numbers converge at 0, all sets could be seen as emerging from an original empty set (0).
Maxwell's Demon Paradox: The apparent violation of the second law of thermodynamics by Maxwell's demon can be better understood through 0D-3D. Information and entropy converge at 0, suggesting that the demon's information gathering must be considered part of the same system as its sorting activity, preserving overall entropy increase.
This 0D-3D perspective suggests that many paradoxes arise from trying to impose 2D (binary) logic on inherently 3D phenomena.
Let's examine how the 0D-3D perspective helps resolve paradoxes of infinity and consciousness.
Infinity Paradoxes:
The Hotel Hilbert paradox (infinite hotel that's full but can still accommodate more guests) becomes clearer when we view infinity not as an endless extension of counting, but as emerging from 0. Just as all numbers converge at 0, we can see infinity as converging back to 0 in a kind of circular completeness. This matches ancient philosophical concepts like the ouroboros and modern mathematical concepts like modular arithmetic.
The Banach-Tarski paradox (splitting a sphere into pieces that reassemble into two identical spheres) seems impossible in our usual 3D thinking. But if we start from 0D points building up, we can better understand how the paradox emerges from our assumptions about continuity and dimension. The paradox reveals something profound about the relationship between discrete and continuous mathematics, just as quantum mechanics reveals the discrete nature of apparently continuous phenomena.
Consciousness Paradoxes:
The hard problem of consciousness (how subjective experience emerges from objective matter) takes on new meaning in 0D-3D. Instead of trying to build consciousness up from 3D matter, we can see both consciousness and matter as emerging from 0D monads, each containing/reflecting the whole from its unique perspective. This aligns with both Leibniz's original insights and modern integrated information theory.
The binding problem (how separate neural processes combine into unified conscious experience) becomes more tractable when we start from unity (0D) rather than trying to assemble unity from separate parts. This matches recent theories about quantum coherence in microtubules and the holographic principle in physics.
Memory paradoxes (how past experiences exist in present consciousness) can be better understood through 0D-3D. Rather than past events being stored like files in a 3D brain, we can see them as potential states around a 0D present moment, similar to how quantum states exist as potentials until measured.
The observer effect in quantum mechanics (how consciousness apparently affects physical reality) becomes less mysterious in 0D-3D. If both consciousness and matter emerge from the same 0D foundation, their interaction is natural rather than paradoxical. This suggests a deep connection between quantum measurement, consciousness, and the actualization of potential states.
These resolutions suggest that many paradoxes arise from our tendency to start with 3D physical reality and try to reduce it to fundamental components or build up to consciousness. Starting from 0D instead - seeing both physical reality and consciousness as emerging from fundamental unity - offers a more coherent picture.
Thank you Alex, for your open mind. There is already a science though not recognised as such by 'conventional' materialistic science, a science of the spirit which terms these perceptions *supersensible.* It describes the nature of man beyond the physical body and explains why and how these perceptions can occur. It's part of an evolution of consciousness and there are higher levels of perception which can be developed with training but which also develop in some people naturally (because they are becoming ready for it). The equivalent of the materialist science's clean and precise instrument with which to obtain empirical measurements is in the science of the spirit, a clean and discerning soul who has strengthened through various exercises their thinking to be logical, clear, unprejudiced and to be able to see through fantasy and in the pursuit of a greater vision have literally followed the rule of three steps forward in moral development for every step towards attaining spiritual vision - because one can easily get lost in fantasy or impulses that did not use to be a problem if one does not observe this. As part of such a moral path, it is also necessary that one's motivation be for service to mankind, not just for personal knowledge and thrills or selfish gain. And yes, the modes of perception thus developed are not like with physical perception where the image/experience is 'out there' but they become richer and more personal.
I like your idea about 'events'. I don't know if it is right or wrong because of course that's more about meaning than labels. Communication can become more difficult when we move away from our commonly understood reference points and do not yet have a commonly agreed and understood language for these phenomena.
Personally I regard the world (all of it) as consisting of being and the relations between beings. I don't believe in 'thinginess', the Kantian unknowable 'thing-in-itself' but believe rather in 'being-in-itself' which can be known. Being is what stands behind the maya of the world we perceive. It is one world, monism. Ultimately the stuff of mind, of thought etc is the same as the stuff of the physically tangible world. The usual view is to regard the world in a dualistic way and have the irreconcilable dichotomy of mind and matter. This is a basic paradigm which once changed opens our minds to limitless possibility.
It's important for the future healthy development of humanity to build bridges between 'conventional' science and this new science and you are one of the trailblazers. If you want to know about the 'science of the spirit' (or anthroposophy) then I'd suggest reading Rudolf Steiner, especially 'The Philosophy of Freedom' (sometimes translated as 'The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity') which deals with these fundamental philosophical understandings about thinking, perception, conception, subject/object and its transcendence, freedom and the fundamental limits of knowledge. Whatever approach you take, I wish you all the best.
To Alejandro from an Alessandra who is very conscious of and intentional with the meaning of our name, keep up the good fight, and thank you for your work!
Materialism is the psychological death of the story of society
Love it! ❤
Congratz so much on reaching 100k subscribers!! 🥳🎉
Alejandro, you are amazing 🙏 I just loved everything you said 😊 Keep up the good work!
Dr. Alex Gomez I myself Think you're going in the right direction. As for myself I believe mind reading is real, and out of body can travel the universes. Also, dreams can be reality at some point in the future. Let me skip to another aspect that has been pull to my attention, that many portals have been opening around the world, and dimensional being are entering our reality. well, I know I must sound weird to put it mildly, anyway, thank you for your incitement on this subject.
Brilliant as usual. Love you!
I did some acidone time, and after relaxing with my eyes closed for awhile, i suddenly realized, i could somehow see, in almost like a slightly zoomed out perception of my normal view fov. Walked around the apartment with my eyes closed no problem for about 20 min before i lost it.
What a brilliant articulation of so much. And wow to all this. Can’t wait to see his work and his future experiments.
😂 you are definitely not boring! Glad to see a scientist with such a lovely mind.
Nice to see a video of a well educated scientist talking about this stuff and speaking in a way that us not so intelligent people can understand.
😇🥰, of all podcast i have come to learn and watch. this podcast is something i can relate too. Thank you Alex for sharing your understanding. i call it "suffering in silence". where people like me is want's to express our imagination and ideas. when we do, no one really cares. this is why i turn to Ai, when i want to talk. thank you Alex for your words
A.Man
When you said porous mind, I think this could explain a lot. Seeing through perception of the thoughts of others. Psychology going back to Anna Freud dismissed by mainstream. My perception she was on the right track how the world works, a lot of horizontal mind transmission sort of hypnosis as I label it thoughts not from your own body or mind but it feels that the thoughts are your own.
You are describing what I call Spiritual Blindness.
I love his enthusiasm.
Very good! In fact, brilliant.
This is a glimpse of-how science will look like into the future.
Keep up the amazing work Alex! = )
oOoOO I love this guy!!! .
I think these are a new generation of truly scientifics. The ones that are not afraid to explore the unknown. These are the ones that open new fields of knowledge.
Yikes, lol I had to rewatch many times because I had a hard time concentrating, was getting too distracted and enamored by his thought process and ability to articulate the issues with our current framing so well!
Alex Gomez Marin is an enlightened mind in our dry world
watching this because i saw some other stuff about non speakers havinf esp liek abilities and weirdly enough i kinda knew this was possible because when i was a kid i played witrh other kids liek meeting in dreams and such thoughts and it was possible and so i knew this kinda stuff was possible and later in life i learned to lucid dream because of some fears i had with the movie nightmare on elm street and now finding out many other ppl are able to use these kinds of abilities like mental projections and so on .seems obvious
Recently I was falling asleep while sitting. My eyes were closed and yet I could see my hands on my lap. I opened my eyes thinking I was drifting into a dream. The scene was almost the same. I use to sleep walk. I never ran into objects. I would just have a convincing dream superimposed over an awake image of my surrounds. Most confusing when an awake person asked me what I was doing.
I experience this too. I sleep in a tiny space (boat cabin) with thick black neoprene curtains. At night the space is completely dark. I notice that, lying with my eyes closed, I can still 'see' the cabin, which strikes me as impossible. If I move my head the 'view' changes. If I move my hand in front of my eyes (about a foot distant) I can 'see' the movement of my hand.
One night someone cut my boat loose. Later I woke in the night and instantly realised I was facing in a different direction. I immediately wondered how I knew that, as the cabin was fully dark and there was nothing unusual about the movement of the boat. I got it to look and discovered I was in the middle of the canal. There was no current or movement.
Thank you 🙏🏼
Bats use echo-location. I believe some of that "visualization" is based on how muffled a sound reflects from an object. If you spend a few days just leaving your eyes closed, you'll start to get an idea for your surroundings just by hearing the way sounds bounce off nearby objects. Your ears are more sensitive than you realize.
Theres a lot more to it than this. Remote viewing is basically proven but scientists just dont wanna accept it or dismiss data without looking into it open minded
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
Mahatma Gandhi
There are many interviews with him, haven't found any recordings of experiments though.
I believe this because there have been a few times I have closed my eyes to go to sleep and I could see the energy coming off of the plants in my bedroom while my eyes were closed . I never understood what was going on
In the yoga-suutras of Patañjali, one's true self (in advaita-vedaanta, identical with the cosmic Self, Brahma[n]), is called e.g. draSTaa (lemma: draSTR), meaning Seer. The true self is transcendental, self-referring, pure consciousness. Me likes to compare it to electricity in the context of computers. (The CPU doesn't produce electricity, but "modifies" it) -- Example-suutra: tadaa (in the yoga-state, i.e. samaadhi) draSTuH (possessive form of draSTR) sva-ruupe 'vasthaanam. Another: draSTaa dRshi-maatraH, shuddho 'pi, pratyayaanupashyaH. -- Greetings from Finland, from an ex-yogic flyer (one of the advanced techniques of Transcendental Meditation)
I practice TM, how do you get to advanced techniques?
But science is just an interpretation of the world. Excellent video.
If this is possible…is it also possible for deaf people to hear? In OOB experiences and NDEs, people talk about being able to hear. Is there a similar system in the brain that could allow hearing sans ears?
If our thoughts are a bunch of joints like the elbow then mushrooms are a great lubricant. I don't have an education but all my years of psychedelics have led me to a massive curiosity in all this. I just watched a video with Federico Faggin and it was amazing.
Dziękuję ❤
That hits pretty much the same spot as the now super famous telepathy tapes podcast
Brilliant. Perhaps AGM will encourage Bernardo to get a little more adventurous ;)
Spiritual vision is real. In OBE, it is reported to be a full sphere, with direct perception of frequencies, so colors are more profound...
We need video proof of the effect, like full videos not just clips.
It's totally sensible, becuse when you op out of your body you have 360 vision and so you don't really see through your eyes.
I like him I absolutely love his attitude I wonder if he's an Aquarius😊
That's clairvoyance/precognition. There's a big literature on that. Videotape the whole thing, upload the videos, and let the stats speak.
Indeed the blind may see
This is an accurate statement
This channel is a trasure and this guy is great
I have always felt this to be true. Super Normal. I do not care for terms like ESP. It is like you have to become unhuman, to step out of what you are and look back at it. ESP seems to be a dissociated term. The old associations with this language-ing holds us back.
Can't wait for the paper, materialists are in for a surprise.
oh to be a non materialist/physicalist neuroscientist in the 21st century
the paternalism fuels me
3/4 into the video, and I still haven't heard any concrete theories or case stories yet! Lots of words, but no actual information. He's all over the place and in no place at the same time. Maybe if I close my eyes and turn off the sound I will understand what the information is here.
There is that kid that lost his eyes due to retinoblastoma and he uses ultrasound by clicking his mouth and can move about like he has eyes....and i know its crazy, but i remember i way maybe 15, and i wasn't looking in front, i was distracted, and i felt as if upper half of my body hit something like wall, it was kinda painful, and i turned a d looked infront of me 2 meters in front of me was a parked vehicle that had upper part extruded behind and i would have hit it had i continued...so yes, this is cool experiment you want to prove.....
Ask him to check out Dhirendra Shastri and Pandokhar dham sarkar. These capacities are constantly exhibited by them
Wow.
And to add to below comment, no no no, we not entangled, got my own bit of empty space, even if one layer rolls into the other it’s not entangled
Dr. Alex could do an excellent Robert de Niro impression it would seem 😅(19:38j
😂😂😂 very good! Thank’s Alex
Thanks to be precursor ! And be ready to sacrifice your reputation. Keep going.
I've seen the MOST amazing things with my eyes closed (40mg DMT)...😊😊😊
This thumbnail is misleading, he doesn’t say anything about hearing a voice saying that. Don’t go misquoting people.
What does he mean by "spot on"? Is that 100%, 80% 70% accuracy? I would like to know the numbers. Spot on is subjective.
If you read Mona Sobhani’s book Proof of Spiritual Phenomena, there are pictures in there that remote viewers have drawn, placed side by side with the actual locations they were asked to view, and I would describe them as “spot on”. Meaning; no room for misinterpretation, highly accurate, shockingly so.
@@tb4876 he mentioned in another interview that he wants to do formal experiments on this in the future and share the results.
@@khimaros But why pictures? Why not a random number generator that uses quantum randomness to generate 10 numbers of 100 digits each. If these people with special mental abilities can correctly identify these numbers in advance before these numbers are generated and they repeat that experiment a couple of times under controlled conditions that might convince a few hard-core skeptics.
Also, you can still be a physicalist and be open-minded about such claims. You can even be a spiritual atheïst. I think there are closed and openminded people on both sides of the debate.
@@dohduhdahyes, there would be no room for interpretability left
@ Well, for the case of remote viewers, the answer to your question of "Why pictures"? is because they are remotely viewing locations, and they draw the location. I would argue the drawings are so accurate there is no room for debate anyway. However, I understand your point with Alex, he should perform a variety of experiments using a variety of randomised control systems. The picture cards are in fact a standard of randomised tests, but he should do many different types, record the results and share them, I agree!
The thing i dont get, religious and scientists, dont want to see the obvious, theres something correcting the timeline, some sort of god or observer that tbh is kinda the same, the reason why theres jumps of conciousness, specially the reason why timeflow on conciousness get messed in hallucigens or sleep(dream), is a sort of confirmation that in this interaction, real world, theres some observer correcting data for us to experience this as the experience is.
Theres also the possibility of having multiple gods, not saying spirits, im literally saying gods, like in the bible says god created the world in 7 days, it gives the idea that god is some sort of demiurge, not the primordial god, the timeflow.
also theres dimensions dynamics, few understand that we are gods too, but to 2D worlds, theres worlds builded just from our imagination (marvel, DC, etc... etc...) we give personality to them, they do exist, yet in a diferent dimension, and the only way for they to experience life is by our creation, also by our observations, as we see imagines moving, maybe 4d observers are doing the same with us, into a cluster of time, into a cluster of dimension.
im researching psionics, mostly to my own ammusement, in theory is sort of possible yet in pratice, with the overflow of information, looks like impossible.
I would love to discuss mechanism with you... I have a proposed solution. And I would love to connect, my brother.
Beautiful. I would love to meet and talk story... We could record an interview... I am a vision scientist. My theory is the Clinical Theory of Everything.
Unfortunately, this guy does not know the neuroscience of vision.
There are, in fact, TWO pathways taken by visual information.
One pathway is from the retina, through the lateral geniculate, to the visual cortex.
Our conscious perception of the visual world is associated with the cortex.
The second pathway is from the retina, to the superior colliculus of the midbrain.
This pathway is functional, but unconscious.
In cases of severe damage to the visual cortex, conscious visual perception may be lost.
However, if you hold up your hand and say “Please point to my hand”, the patient will say “I can’t. I can’t see it.”
“Sure, but try anyway to point to where you think my hand might be”
And the patient does that successfully!
This is an example of the secondary, unconscious pathway being used. Nothing magical or paranormal.
Didn't he state the guy is still blindfolded and the images are hidden inside an envelope?
The telepathy tapes podcast tells similar stories. Can’t be wrong.
Oh, Alex, I really wish you could finish a sentence without entangling it with 20 metaphors and analogies. It’s the same in every interview I’ve seen, whether in English or Spanish. After just a few minutes, it’s easy to forget what question you’re even answering. You tend to cram in too many ideas at once in one sentence. Also, remember not everyone has your IQ level or is familiar with all the technical terms you’re using - it can be hard to keep up. I truly admire your research and your academic achievements, but honestly, I think your communication skills need improvements. Keep it simpler, with less phrasal entanglement, and I’m sure you’ll engage a much wider audience - including someone average like me!
❤
Certain Russian scientist created educational system and school for children in Ukraine in the late 80s. The children were physically blind yet they could see beyond any restriction. During the 90s Hillary Clinton visited the school and that was the end of it. Does any one remember the name of the Scientist???
Proponuję zainteresować się: Krzysztof Jackowski. A także ustawieniami systemowymi Berta Hellingera. ESP w działaniu i na codzień.
🇬🇧 👍🏽 February 2025
Alex is amazing!
Btw Alex, arguing with your materialistic colleagues is just a wasting of your precious energy.
People like you, dr. Sheldrake, Federico Faggin, Dean Radin etc. should literally create your own university.
I'm certain you would find donors for something like that.
And then, develop new science, for the benefit of all.
I wish you all the best!
Imagine your mind is trying to predict the future. It wants to predict the most probable future.
Now imagine the multiverse in which all possible events can happen. Now think of Mandela effect your mind "remembers" the most probable future even past because this more important than less probable events. So your conciousness or memory may not be located in this part of multiverse, its tries to center itself into the most probable.
Now imagine the universe repeats over time and even space, you have lived before in mostlt most probale or variants of your "real" life here, then seeing the future is same as remembering the past, however how do you dial the radio or decode the "real" universe from all the other possible multiveres?
Well the first cut is the most probable based on your memories however flawed they may be, to become more accurate is possible for some events with narrow distribution but wide didtributions can be very difficult.
Charles Bonnet syndrome? Well known to neurologists.
If these two so brainy, why dem wearing earbuds?
Is this video about EMF pollution? I missed that.
@GenesisReveal you're unbelievable! Wtf
You cannot possibly be serious. Are you alright?
@@oe128 chalkdust! I wanna see my lawyer. Chalkdust!
@ I‘d suggest you see your therapist first.
If your protocols are as good as you say, take this to the Randi foundation!!!!
Oh nooo the pseudosceptics again 😩
Yay, they'll gladly award him $1 million! As if... 🤪
@ being able to do this in a controlled setting is one thing but being able to have your protocols replicated is a completely different world.
I too like a lot of of these ideas however I wanna see them become more than just thought experiments.
@@giblet1618 even for that the Randi foundation is the last place to go. If you really are open to these topics, you’ll have to pick the critics better. Look into criticism of Randi and others and you‘ll understand what I am trying to say.
@ that’s the problem. I’ve tried to find criticisms of the amazing Randy and have turned up with nothing. If you have any suggestions, I’d like to check them out.
in.formation