The Discourses of Epictetus - Book 2 - (My Narration & Notes)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 พ.ค. 2024
  • This is my narration of The Discourses of Epictetus
    The Discourses of Epictetus are a series of informal lectures by the Stoic philosopher Epictetus written down by his pupil Arrian around 108 AD. Four books out of an original eight are still extant. The philosophy of Epictetus is intensely practical. He directs his students to focus attention on their opinions, anxieties, passions and desires, so that "they may never fail to get what they desire, nor fall into what they avoid." True education lies in learning to distinguish what is our own from what does not belong to us, and in learning to correctly assent or dissent to external impressions. The purpose of his teaching was to make people free and happy.
    This is my own recording of Book 2/4 of The Discourses of Epictetus.
    Buy on Audible: geni.us/DiscoursesOnAudible
    Book on Amazon: geni.us/DiscoursesOfEpictetus (affiliate link)
    My other recordings on Audible: geni.us/VoxStoicaOnAudible
    Listen free on Hoopla with a US library card: www.hoopladigital.com/artist/...
    Translation by William Abbot Oldfather: en.wikisource.org/wiki/Epicte...
    Support:
    Paypal: www.paypal.me/RobinHomer
    linktr.ee/VoxStoica
    * Timestamps *
    Start: 0:00
    Chapter 1 - 0:02
    Chapter 2 - 11:58
    Chapter 3 - 17:59
    Chapter 4 - 19:37
    Chapter 5 - 23:03
    Chapter 6 - 31:24
    Chapter 7 - 38:19
    Chapter 8 - 42:12
    Chapter 9 - 50:32
    Chapter 10 - 56:39
    Chapter 11 - 1:04:43
    Chapter 12 - 1:11:33
    Chapter 13 - 1:18:02
    Chapter 14 - 1:25:55
    Chapter 15 - 1:34:06
    Chapter 16 - 1:39:24
    Chapter 17 - 1:53:12
    Chapter 18 - 2:05:06
    Chapter 19 - 2:13:23
    Chapter 20 - 2:24:25
    Chapter 21 - 2:36:09
    Chapter 22 - 2:43:31
    Chapter 23 - 2:55:26
    Chapter 24 - 3:08:54
    Chapter 25 - 3:17:45
    Chapter 26 - 3:18:30
    #Stoicism #Epictetus #PewdiepieBookReview

ความคิดเห็น • 146

  • @VoxStoica
    @VoxStoica  4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Book on Amazon: geni.us/EpictetusDiscourses (affiliate link) | Audible geni.us/DiscoursesOnAudible
    Chapter Timings:
    Chapter 1 - 0:02
    Chapter 2 - 11:58
    Chapter 3 - 17:59
    Chapter 4 - 19:37
    Chapter 5 - 23:03
    Chapter 6 - 31:24
    Chapter 7 - 38:19
    Chapter 8 - 42:12
    Chapter 9 - 50:32
    Chapter 10 - 56:39
    Chapter 11 - 1:04:43
    Chapter 12 - 1:11:33
    Chapter 13 - 1:18:02
    Chapter 14 - 1:25:55
    Chapter 15 - 1:34:06
    Chapter 16 - 1:39:24
    Chapter 17 - 1:53:12
    Chapter 18 - 2:05:06
    Chapter 19 - 2:13:23
    Chapter 20 - 2:24:25
    Chapter 21 - 2:36:09
    Chapter 22 - 2:43:31
    Chapter 23 - 2:55:26
    Chapter 24 - 3:08:54
    Chapter 25 - 3:17:45
    Chapter 26 - 3:18:30

    • @nickcalling9695
      @nickcalling9695 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hey Robin are you alright with one using a few minutes (5max ) of your recordings ?. Ofcoarse links to original source will be linked (voxstoica)

    • @VoxStoica
      @VoxStoica  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@nickcalling9695 no problem.

    • @MrJohnDocHolliday
      @MrJohnDocHolliday 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      In Kabbalah, the Sephirot are the ten emanations or attributes through which the divine manifests and interacts with the world. The concept of the Divine Spark is closely connected to the Sephirah known as Tiferet, which represents harmony, beauty, and the integration of the divine qualities.
      The Divine Spark, also known as the "Nitzotz Elohim" in Hebrew, refers to the essence of the divine that resides within every individual. It is considered a fragment of the divine consciousness that is present in all living beings, connecting them to the source of all creation.
      According to Kabbalistic teachings, the Divine Spark is the spiritual core that animates and gives life to each individual. It is seen as the divine imprint within us, reflecting our true nature and potential for goodness, creativity, and spiritual growth.
      The Divine Spark is associated with various attributes, including the soul, higher self, or divine essence. It is believed to be an eternal and indestructible part of our being that transcends the limitations of time and space.
      Through spiritual practices such as meditation, prayer, and acts of loving-kindness, individuals can connect with and nurture the Divine Spark within themselves. By cultivating awareness of this divine presence, one can align their thoughts, emotions, and actions with the divine will, leading to personal growth, spiritual enlightenment, and the fulfillment of their true potential.
      Kabbalistic teachings emphasize the importance of recognizing and honoring the Divine Spark not only within ourselves but also in others. It encourages compassion, empathy, and respect for the inherent sacredness and divine potential of every being. By recognizing the Divine Spark in others, we foster unity, harmony, and a deeper sense of interconnectedness with all of creation.
      The journey of self-discovery and spiritual evolution in Kabbalah involves realizing and nurturing the Divine Spark within, uncovering its hidden qualities and allowing its light to shine forth. It is a path of integrating and balancing the divine qualities within us, leading to a greater sense of wholeness, purpose, and alignment with the divine source.
      In summary, the Divine Spark in Kabbalah refers to the essence of the divine that resides within each individual. It is a spiritual core that connects us to the source of all creation and represents our true nature and potential. By recognizing, nurturing, and aligning with the Divine Spark, individuals can embark on a transformative journey of self-discovery, spiritual growth, and connection with the divine.

    • @RainierGerman
      @RainierGerman 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      11111

    • @StanleyMauroJensern
      @StanleyMauroJensern 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😅I’m 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

  • @publis9094
    @publis9094 3 ปีที่แล้ว +90

    Dude... I cannot believe I have found this channel. WHAT A GEM

    • @freedomfighters5095
      @freedomfighters5095 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Your sound said it all that u hvnt found anything yet.
      DUDE.

    • @veenvern8787
      @veenvern8787 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Infinite Shoeblack waarheid

    • @rckli
      @rckli ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Infinite Shoeblack I’m not a fan of TH-cam channels that tell you what someone says out of context - I prefer stuff like this where the speaker doesn’t add or remove information

    • @rckli
      @rckli ปีที่แล้ว

      @Infinite Shoeblack are those channels the type that do that, bitter person?

    • @rckli
      @rckli ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MaryDunford I’ll check em out - for some reason, the question upset the other fella

  • @maximelagace
    @maximelagace ปีที่แล้ว +22

    "He who laughs at himself, never runs out of things to laugh at." -Epictetus

    • @bendyloco
      @bendyloco 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Oh wow, what a quote! I’m going to try to remind myself of this everyday from now on, thank you for posting this!

    • @maximelagace
      @maximelagace 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My pleasure!@@bendyloco

  • @Human_Evolution-
    @Human_Evolution- 4 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    The best free Stoic audiobook source there is.

    • @IONIZEDatom
      @IONIZEDatom 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      When are we going to get the discourses on audible?

  • @nottzbulldog
    @nottzbulldog 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    This channel contributes so much to the community with these audiobooks. In my opinion, the channel should get more recognition than the click bait that is so widespread on this platform.

  • @StoicInYourLife
    @StoicInYourLife 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great. I listen to it every day, and I know how to make my working day productive. I'm trying every day

  • @tristontorres2139
    @tristontorres2139 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Epictetus should be standard teaching. Agree or disagree , it is a valuable teaching.

  • @lingling1833
    @lingling1833 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I fell asleep watching xqc and woke up to this👍

  • @christhompson7163
    @christhompson7163 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Thanks Robin,
    I really enjoy your narrations, looking forward to listening to this

  • @StoicAurelius1
    @StoicAurelius1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    By far the most useful and practical Chanel on TH-cam

  • @blahboidblah
    @blahboidblah 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This is gold. Thank you.

  • @Primetiime32
    @Primetiime32 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Tranquility is my fav read of the book

  • @thePWNmaster5
    @thePWNmaster5 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I like the part where he compares adulterers to pieces of dung.

    • @wiseferret4745
      @wiseferret4745 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me too.

    • @tristontorres2139
      @tristontorres2139 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you hold a bias?

    • @magnipettersson4432
      @magnipettersson4432 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@tristontorres2139 he holds a moral and a steadfast value just as you do i assume?
      Weird way to judge someone because they dislike adultery

    • @ColonelMinecraft
      @ColonelMinecraft 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@tristontorres2139don't we all hold a bias to one way or another? There is no real objectivity

    • @insidiousmaximus
      @insidiousmaximus 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm a piece of dung and I find this highly offensive

  • @ashstandish2631
    @ashstandish2631 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I love it when he says "what then"

  • @brswindler
    @brswindler 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Been waiting for this one, thanks Robin!

  • @antoniobarbalau1107
    @antoniobarbalau1107 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Amazing. Thank you very much ♥️

  • @justinrudolph7232
    @justinrudolph7232 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome. Thanks, Robin!

  • @tyronemailmen
    @tyronemailmen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you my friend.

  • @manalisawant5704
    @manalisawant5704 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you so much! 🤓🙏

  • @JMotiveMU
    @JMotiveMU 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks again for everything.

  • @urmilamathur8714
    @urmilamathur8714 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Where are you Mr. Homer? I've been waiting for your videos. When will you be uploading those!

  • @anonymousaustralianhistory2081
    @anonymousaustralianhistory2081 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks so much for making these

  • @mihail5927
    @mihail5927 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks again vox!

  • @MVR4444
    @MVR4444 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much for sharing :)

  • @ashstandish2631
    @ashstandish2631 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is awesome 👏

  • @lokoomontana4818
    @lokoomontana4818 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You just made my day

  • @truenorthaffirmations7049
    @truenorthaffirmations7049 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yes!!! Next level

  • @sucramsucram3558
    @sucramsucram3558 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you.

  • @jennifercooking101
    @jennifercooking101 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    amazing, thank you.

  • @jeante97
    @jeante97 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thnx for this great content

  • @WuffeliTM
    @WuffeliTM 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you!

  • @ryanstphor268
    @ryanstphor268 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you

  • @theweedphilosopher
    @theweedphilosopher 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Stoicism is my fav philosophy ❤

  • @cray-zelord
    @cray-zelord 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Love it

  • @abortodedios
    @abortodedios ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you vox stoica for all these prudent years. I wanted to make a slight correction for future pronunciations of Nike 47:53 the deity of victory, it would be better if the Ni was pronounced like Knee and the Ké like the first syllable of Care, emphasis on the accent kÉ. Like the ancient Greeks did it.
    in pointing out this correction I have followed one of the advices of Marcus Aurelius.

    • @magnipettersson4432
      @magnipettersson4432 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Maaaaaan you aint greek You just trynna make our boy get canceled for saying the nword. I know thst trick. The good old "pretend its a real word" well guess what? Nikker is pronounced excacly like the nword and means "nodding" in Danish.
      Go ahead. Say it bro

  • @masterdriveroftoyotazupr4164
    @masterdriveroftoyotazupr4164 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1:45:25 "Why man, what are you about?" That hits 😔

  • @rckli
    @rckli ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I was in an argument with someone over whether stoics believed in god
    I tried explaining to the person that “god” changes meaning from person to person and their definition doesn’t necessarily fit everyone else’s.
    I further pushed that seneca didn’t believe in a physical god like in the Bible and he said “THEYRE PANTHEISTS THEY THINK EVERYTHING IS A GOD” 😅
    He stopped talking to me

    • @gailnewcomb8256
      @gailnewcomb8256 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You must have given your friend something to think about. Maybe they will come back and talk after much pondering. ❤️

  • @samuelwilliams3133
    @samuelwilliams3133 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Free

  • @diorockzhell
    @diorockzhell ปีที่แล้ว +1

    45:50

  • @maduzahzeye
    @maduzahzeye ปีที่แล้ว +1

    love

  • @sdasda4654
    @sdasda4654 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for the audio

  • @Aa11qq
    @Aa11qq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    19:34

  • @seleldjdfmn221
    @seleldjdfmn221 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Great job. i hope You make it big one day! Stay frosty :D

  • @ashstandish2631
    @ashstandish2631 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Judgement is knowledge, opinion or delusion. That is so true

  • @TobyDada
    @TobyDada 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi! I love your voice. are you on a podcast? :) love lots.

  • @coachishaaq
    @coachishaaq 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Always great content. i have always been inspired by your videos. You content is always amazing Vox, Though i have started my channel. Thanks for the inspiration. Greater Height👍

  • @leadperformer420
    @leadperformer420 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2:05:05

  • @bronsomccor2642
    @bronsomccor2642 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love philosophy I am learning Stoicism Taoism Nihilism many more it changes my mindset what I know about philosophy is they always reference god or something even tho they don't believe in God maybe they use god cause it's a
    reason

    • @julianj860
      @julianj860 ปีที่แล้ว

      In my experience they dont use the word god as a higher power with human form in the sky, but rather for the deep rooted energy that every living being has inside of them.

  • @vonthebarbarian9058
    @vonthebarbarian9058 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Vox. :)

  • @michaelthomheadley
    @michaelthomheadley ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That first chapter...

  • @nielsvanbedaf1054
    @nielsvanbedaf1054 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    👁❤⚘

  • @TheFirstManticore
    @TheFirstManticore ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does Epictetus regard Christianity and Judaism as the same religion?

  • @44Quotes89
    @44Quotes89 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good

  • @ashstandish2631
    @ashstandish2631 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I lovr stoicness

  • @wpbarchitect1800
    @wpbarchitect1800 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Be very cautious when applying pre-scientific, pre-enlightenment philosophy (and of course I include the 'Eastern' ones here as well) to the circumstance of living in the modern world. Much of it was developed as a way to cope with what was understood to be a totally fatalistic world run by unseen forces we had zero agency over, so the trick was: how does one learn to deal with a harsh unforgiving world they have little to no control over? Essentially, live in DENIAL. Which is always a great sell, obviously even today. I'm not saying their aren't many very healthy lessons here (and in the Eastern versions) but taken too literally one will find themselves focusing on how to ignore the problems of their life via various philosophical frameworks rather than facing and doing productive things to deal with them, which does NOT end well. At a certain point denial hit the brick wall of reality.

    • @magnipettersson4432
      @magnipettersson4432 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They dont say to live in denial nor ignore your problems. The whole point is to focus on what you can do right NOW and not fill your brain with problems that dont exist in your realm of effect. To accept the world as it is also means to accept yourself as part of it

    • @rmivy1984
      @rmivy1984 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great book idea. Translating the philosophy to modern constructs? I'd love to listen.

    • @magnipettersson4432
      @magnipettersson4432 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@rmivy1984 just read my comment. Hes just saying stuff to critique it. The works work petty well still in this day and age

    • @IPursuePeppers-CTH
      @IPursuePeppers-CTH 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      it’s made to focus on oneself rather than others, knowing your place and purpose, knowing your next step. and dealing with the actions to take said step. Living in denial is the opposite of what they’d want you to do, living in absolute transparency, seeing it as it truly is. that’s what they’d want you to do. not just seeing it as it is but taking that and dissecting it through yourself and assessing the situation. denial is an absence of thought, it’s ignorance as to how it is. it’s crime of natures and oneself, your depriving yourself of free knowledge and thought on purpose which is ultimately stupidity.

    • @lindasue8719
      @lindasue8719 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The amusing thing is, you describe exactly what we deal with today!

  • @richardsrensen4219
    @richardsrensen4219 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    is it not bedst to have the book and the the a adible book at the same time . but i cant find this with your voice on Robin ?

    • @VoxStoica
      @VoxStoica  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hey Richard, yes, I've updated the pinned comment and description. (geni.us/DiscoursesOnAudible)
      (It had submitted it to Audible a while ago but it took a while to appear on their site)

  • @boburwell9921
    @boburwell9921 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The grool, piss and vinegar

  • @simplengxplorer137
    @simplengxplorer137 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great! dudz

  • @astu5114
    @astu5114 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2:26

  • @uyenartist6366
    @uyenartist6366 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    it happens tonight . he kicked me and dropped my phone keeps my son quite locked the door kicked me out and singing.. he think he is an angel i can not do anything. becaue im stupid . i need help.

    • @lauralide4804
      @lauralide4804 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Are you ok now? Is there anything I can do? Please try and get help and get out of the dangerous situation you're in. You're not stupid, you're a victim

  • @ashstandish2631
    @ashstandish2631 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Being stoic is the shit

  • @klawdszxc
    @klawdszxc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Chapter 8 - 42:12

  • @heshamsharaf3053
    @heshamsharaf3053 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ☃️🎄🙏🏼💡💖🕯️📖

  • @searchingsoul5910
    @searchingsoul5910 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was thinking of adding some symbolism to numbers and dates.
    Such as, 5*11, small birth days, and 5 big birth days. These would represent the cycles of months and years, and the connection between the cycles of planets and stars, and our awakenings. There is a first birth, rebirth for both, and a birth of the relationship alike. Ritual should be tied to all, each unique, but in a way representing its place in the cycle. This will act as gate ways for our higher self. To easily see year and month of events, as when time is understood linearly. This is a technology of ceremony and ritual.

    • @searchingsoul5910
      @searchingsoul5910 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I know of the ritual, meditating into a large plate with psychedelic lights and music divinely inspired, with the numbers of the date. This would create an optimal channel of connection for higher self to self, when inspiring thought.

  • @NotJonJost
    @NotJonJost ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The amount to which Epictetus clearly hates, and is very worked up about, Epicurus is kind of funny. I guess he values hating on Epicurus more than he values being unbothered by the externals of Epicurus and his writings/thought. :P
    It's also funny because of just how badly he misrepresents Epicurus in pretty much all of his criticisms and clear anger.

    • @mrman2415
      @mrman2415 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is hard not to get annoyed when dealing with a "philosophy" that's built on folly.

    • @magnipettersson4432
      @magnipettersson4432 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      To detach from such things doesnt mean you remove such things. It means he could always evolve past it

  • @hardeepkaur2753
    @hardeepkaur2753 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Respect and honours journey souls breathing is temple myself universe myself health myself silence myself beautiful beautiful beautiful souls journey thank you thankyou thankyou gods gift blessings for no music

  • @delivered1030
    @delivered1030 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    FYI. Your channel is being listed as "Religious Con", "Anti-SJW" etc., from a site gathering info on political & other ideologies. This channel got mistaken. Its starting to be a problem for others. Called Transparency Tube. Some are successful requesting removal through the Twitter account. I wanted to give you an FYI so you can remedy the problem before it can get out of hand.

    • @VoxStoica
      @VoxStoica  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Interesting, thank you for bringing it to my attention.

    • @ottereformicus782
      @ottereformicus782 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Critical Theory is the most Dangerous Philosophy, www.newdiscourses.com exposes it quite intensely

    • @lauralide4804
      @lauralide4804 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ottereformicus782
      What is that? This is my first philosophy book, I'm a bit lost as to what you're talking about

    • @ottereformicus782
      @ottereformicus782 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@lauralide4804 What I'm referring to has nothing to do with the content of this video but more so to the message by the user called delivered, warning vox that he's being put on a list that's Anti SJW and their ideology of concepts is in the body of what's called 'Critical Theory' which is a massive pile of garbage for psychopathy. Search James Lindsday and a video called Psuedo Reality please please please watch it. and again go to Newdiscourses site please tell many people about this.

  • @linyonglan
    @linyonglan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is everything OK? It's been more than three months since you've put anything up here.

  • @tenshi_tries
    @tenshi_tries 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Here so I could finish the book before Pewdiepie's Book review

    • @SERGE_Tech
      @SERGE_Tech 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wow glad he’s reading something. I’ve always liked him even though I seldom watch his stuff.

  • @steveberman2619
    @steveberman2619 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I hate myself

  • @leventer2240
    @leventer2240 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Stoic gang OUGH

  • @sithcat7025
    @sithcat7025 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why has Robin been quiet for so long a time?

  • @heroismismissing9516
    @heroismismissing9516 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    TFW you thought it was Epicurus instead of Epictetus -.-
    Stoicism seems sexy but it's a bit dry. Epicureanism seems indulgent but is rich and actionable. WHICH WAY WESTERN MAN

  • @BebeSoule
    @BebeSoule 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    His entire philosophy is based off of his own assumptions about the universe instead of a clear mind looking at the universe.

    • @magnipettersson4432
      @magnipettersson4432 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      His version of a clear mind is different from yours. We dont share reslity perception only ever do we share observation but neither do we share conclusion

    • @theweedphilosopher
      @theweedphilosopher 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@magnipettersson4432somebody didn’t listen

    • @magnipettersson4432
      @magnipettersson4432 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@theweedphilosopher all humans have different intellects and think differently. The important part is being true to that nature. So i did fkn listen. His four books all examplify this ideology

  • @johnsmith-mz9hh
    @johnsmith-mz9hh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Epictetus would find it hard to get published this today.
    He would be labelled sexist , misogynist and anti Semitic

  • @jdgalovic9068
    @jdgalovic9068 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    L lmk

  • @clutchgods1379
    @clutchgods1379 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    PewDiePie...

  • @bronsomccor2642
    @bronsomccor2642 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Don't like the fact he keeps talking about god

    • @julianj860
      @julianj860 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They dont use it as a higher power with human form in the sky. His definition is completely different. Its more like an energy that every being has and is connected by. At least from my understanding

  • @Freedom21stCenturi
    @Freedom21stCenturi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lots of babbling going on here.

  • @joshuawolf7448
    @joshuawolf7448 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He was not a stoic

    • @faded1to3black
      @faded1to3black 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He's literally one of the 3 major sources for Stoic philosophy, so yes, he definitely was.

    • @joshuawolf7448
      @joshuawolf7448 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      1:40:40. On his meditations

    • @joshuawolf7448
      @joshuawolf7448 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And for more.....philosophy governs itself.....theres isn't a need to add to it

    • @joshuawolf7448
      @joshuawolf7448 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      1:40:40. Meditations

    • @joshuawolf7448
      @joshuawolf7448 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And for more... philosophy governs itself. No need adding to it

  • @josieynostros7427
    @josieynostros7427 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't like this Man that is talking no good at all

  • @michealjohn7192
    @michealjohn7192 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    read by david mitchell lol