This is spot on correct claim as true and the added benefits to doing this besides being a diesel are *ENORMOUS* as when used at "trolling speeds" of say 6-8 knots this is also an *AMAZING* energy recovery system for topping off ahem "trolling motor batteries" ahem creating the first true hybrid electric platform for Boating as an Industry first as well😊
The engine doesn't turn. The waterjet has a steering nozzle on the discharge. You can see the stainless nozzle gimble shaft in some of the views that show the bottom of the jet.
Most sailboats need a large outboard but it’s impossible at sea . Nobody has a product in the long range electric outboard. May 50-100hp to push a 40ft or so at 5 knots at 50% throttle. The market is huge and untapped. I just need the outboard and I’m starting a package deal.
Weeks Marine has the conventional Oxe outboards and tear them up "weekly"! I personally am building a pleasure boat (32' x 9'6")will the engines hold up? So far we are Not impressed!
Awsome video , i have a question. I have a twin outboard, and prop wash is an issue trolling. Is there less prop wash with a jet? Number 1 fan of SPEECHLESS,, as soon as the weather warmes up, im gonna contact you.
The shielded nature of the impeller in waterjets makes them so much safer than props for marine life and swimmer's... Though more efficient than an open prop it would be interesting to see the comparison with a toroidal/sharrow prop and the deep speed electric rim driven electrojet.. the advantage tends to open up in favour of jets as speed increases.. and with jets however the rim driven blades of the electrojet mean it continues to cause less cavitation and has lower operating costs in terms of servicing .. oil and filter changes. That give the Rim driven E jet a speed and efficiency advantage over internal ICE driven interior waterjets. The bio diesel option makes sense but even more logical is the development and substitution of the rotary liquid piston diesel and multi fuel motors.. mainly for simplicity size and lightness 80%. and also another 20 -30% efficiency . They produce less noise vibration and with only about 60 parts in a whole motor. They are also inherently quieter and physically small. To anyone interested in wake turbulence/noise reduction rim driven electric drive adds total rpm control from 1rpm up to max. to the options whilst full motor torque is available from the first few RPM. Up to near max. This is an interesting and valuable transitional development but it can quickly be overtaken if the combustion of the fuel is optimised through an advanced generator .. as in comercial diesel electric systems..🤔
Um am I just dumb but a 300hp outboard is between $28k-$38k. He compares an outboard to inboard. Why? He says it’s $100k versus a $160k inboard. Also isn’t the Yamaha jet engines way less than that. I mean the Yamaha 25fsh with twin jet engines isn’t even $100k. Granted you can’t get just the Yamaha engines as far as I know but seems like it’s a ridiculous price.
@@edwardbowles8613 ah yeah that makes sense. When he said it, it seemed off though. That does make sense though. I don’t know what diesel inboards cost but I’d imagine it’s right around there.
300 hp diesel is way more then 300 gas hp as the torque wil be much higher so you can run a bigger prop on the diesel meaning a 300hp diesel wil be faster then a 300hp gas engine
@@gabbermaikel but what about the gearbox? Diesel engines are Torque Monsters, can the gearbox survive for enough time to make it financially make sense?
Who ever heard sucking in water - ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE BOAT? I guess the water suddenly has to bob up into the intake. How can that be efficient at more than a few MPH?
if you look properly you will see a tube on the back of the boat. when the engine is lowered into position the front of the jet seals onto that tube. and that tube leads to the intake thats under the bracket ( similar to an armstrong bracket )
Nananana, not so faaasst. So did OXE just solve the diesel soot problem, or is it just unregulated in the maritime applications? That's true, if the guy says, that diesels are 50% cleaner in terms of CO2 compared to gasolines, buuut what about the typical diesel problems: NOx and soot? Solved or not regulated? P.S. I was triggered by him mentioning, that this engine was much cleaner than others in that room..
If the exhaust is discharged into the water like most marine engines you will not have an issue with airborne soot particles. Also for the most part boats do not operate in highly populated areas.
Prices for those diesel-powered outboards is way toooooo ridiculous & soon another intelligent engine manufacturer will make some less than half their price & see prices drop fast!
The President should retire. I half way pay attention to these motors but now he satisfied my suspicion. For me, a salesman that is trying way too hard and willing to say things that aren't true isn't looking out for your interests. There is a rule in the Marine Industry. If Merc. Engineers haven't done it, it doesn't need doing. Yes I know they've built a diesel.
Wow, this blew me away.
This is spot on correct claim as true and the added benefits to doing this besides being a diesel are *ENORMOUS* as when used at "trolling speeds" of say 6-8 knots this is also an *AMAZING* energy recovery system for topping off ahem "trolling motor batteries" ahem creating the first true hybrid electric platform for Boating as an Industry first as well😊
So efficiency is higher with jet than prop, is that what this man is claiming?
1-1power on the jet???? Really? I would like to see it in person.
Cool cool. But this is not a review. It's a preview.
No, this is a sales pitch.
I'd like some better pics. Looks like the intake is attached to the transom? How do they turn?
The engine doesn't turn. The waterjet has a steering nozzle on the discharge. You can see the stainless nozzle gimble shaft in some of the views that show the bottom of the jet.
Most sailboats need a large outboard but it’s impossible at sea . Nobody has a product in the long range electric outboard. May 50-100hp to push a 40ft or so at 5 knots at 50% throttle. The market is huge and untapped. I just need the outboard and I’m starting a package deal.
Awesome😊
Marcus, when u get a chance, can u let me know about prop wash with the jet compared to props outboard motors. Thanks
Could you provide us service manual & parts catalog manual or download CD .I been servicing lately phillipine navy OXE 150 hp . Screw propulsion
That’s a lot of money for 300hp. The price has to come way down.
Wel I mean it’s not for basic recreation….
Weeks Marine has the conventional Oxe outboards and tear them up "weekly"!
I personally am building a pleasure boat (32' x 9'6")will the engines hold up? So far we are Not impressed!
I was down until the end lmao
Carbon pollutes water? I'd like to hear more about that.
I hope the best for this company.
But 90k is out of my price range.
My two Suzuki's rigged, costed less.
Awsome video , i have a question. I have a twin outboard, and prop wash is an issue trolling. Is there less prop wash with a jet? Number 1 fan of SPEECHLESS,, as soon as the weather warmes up, im gonna contact you.
yes it diße
The shielded nature of the impeller in waterjets makes them so much safer than props for marine life and swimmer's...
Though more efficient than an open prop it would be interesting to see the comparison with a toroidal/sharrow prop and the deep speed electric rim driven electrojet.. the advantage tends to open up in favour of jets as speed increases.. and with jets however the rim driven blades of the electrojet mean it continues to cause less cavitation and has lower operating costs in terms of servicing .. oil and filter changes. That give the Rim driven E jet a speed and efficiency advantage over internal ICE driven interior waterjets.
The bio diesel option makes sense but even more logical is the development and substitution of the rotary liquid piston diesel and multi fuel motors.. mainly for simplicity size and lightness 80%. and also another 20 -30% efficiency .
They produce less noise vibration and with only about 60 parts in a whole motor. They are also inherently quieter and physically small.
To anyone interested in wake turbulence/noise reduction rim driven electric drive adds total rpm control from 1rpm up to max. to the options whilst full motor torque is available from the first few RPM. Up to near max.
This is an interesting and valuable transitional development but it can quickly be overtaken if the combustion of the fuel is optimised through an advanced generator .. as in comercial diesel electric systems..🤔
Такой привод КПД сильно занижин, чем у простого винта.
Awesome technology. However, the cost is STILL way to high. It's not going anywhere for now.
I'd put the Cox 300hp V8 diesel up against it any day.
Looks like OXE has a lot of issues with the engines and support to workshops. I wouldn't even think of buying it
Hola Precio porfa
Only 90k lol I’m looking at 40-50ft sailboats for 70-100k
Um am I just dumb but a 300hp outboard is between $28k-$38k. He compares an outboard to inboard. Why? He says it’s $100k versus a $160k inboard. Also isn’t the Yamaha jet engines way less than that. I mean the Yamaha 25fsh with twin jet engines isn’t even $100k. Granted you can’t get just the Yamaha engines as far as I know but seems like it’s a ridiculous price.
Guessing he is comparing it to a diesel inboard so comparing diesel to diesel. Not outboard to outboard.
@@edwardbowles8613 ah yeah that makes sense. When he said it, it seemed off though. That does make sense though. I don’t know what diesel inboards cost but I’d imagine it’s right around there.
Yep, as Edward said 👍
300 hp diesel is way more then 300 gas hp as the torque wil be much higher so you can run a bigger prop on the diesel meaning a 300hp diesel wil be faster then a 300hp gas engine
@@gabbermaikel but what about the gearbox? Diesel engines are Torque Monsters, can the gearbox survive for enough time to make it financially make sense?
345 Manuel Station
Who ever heard sucking in water - ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE BOAT? I guess the water suddenly has to bob up into the intake. How can that be efficient at more than a few MPH?
if you look properly you will see a tube on the back of the boat. when the engine is lowered into position the front of the jet seals onto that tube. and that tube leads to the intake thats under the bracket ( similar to an armstrong bracket )
Every jet on every boat is above the hull line , try and educate yourself on jet pumps
THE BIGTIME
Nananana, not so faaasst. So did OXE just solve the diesel soot problem, or is it just unregulated in the maritime applications? That's true, if the guy says, that diesels are 50% cleaner in terms of CO2 compared to gasolines, buuut what about the typical diesel problems: NOx and soot? Solved or not regulated?
P.S. I was triggered by him mentioning, that this engine was much cleaner than others in that room..
It would depend on how you set it up .
If the exhaust is discharged into the water like most marine engines you will not have an issue with airborne soot particles. Also for the most part boats do not operate in highly populated areas.
Lol 160 000 for comparable outboard. Ok I'm an idiot Doug 🤣
4538 Smith Ways
9196 Purdy Underpass
Prices for those diesel-powered outboards is way toooooo ridiculous & soon another intelligent engine manufacturer will make some less than half their price & see prices drop fast!
oxe 200 hp disel jet outvard
Eva Gabor relative ? Oliver you need an outvard for the tractor
BMW B57 twin turbo outboard, hmm.
Unreliable overpriced junk
Sorry, but jets are not more efficient.
Things that are fast are not efficient
At least it looks cool
@@jackdaniels2657 you can't even see it when it's in the water
@@jackdaniels2657 jet drive boats are slower then prop
The President should retire. I half way pay attention to these motors but now he satisfied my suspicion. For me, a salesman that is trying way too hard and willing to say things that aren't true isn't looking out for your interests. There is a rule in the Marine Industry. If Merc. Engineers haven't done it, it doesn't need doing. Yes I know they've built a diesel.
Sorry oxe your not the 1st warter jet yamaha has
Stop bragging about instantaneous thrust at take off. Water jets totally suck against a prop from a start. Very weak.
Why so frustrated Fred? It’s OK to not like the tech, but no need to get angry about it man. Life’s too short.
Agreed, prop performance way better and more efficient than a jet. Not sure how they are coming up with that.
ONLY $90K.. HAHA.. I'LL STICK TO HONDA, YAMAHA, SUZUKI, AND ANYTHING JAPANESE MADE
6167 Schamberger Islands
6620 Homenick Keys
Meh cat 32b ...is the bone.$150 k worth the extra $25,000 bones ..🥹