“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. " Orwell, 1984
Must be long time since you read it mate? Dennis is transitioning now mate. He's been on puberty blockers for months. He's going by the name Denise these days. @@ChimpingBulldog
Those of us who are old enough to remeber what it was like to grow up in the sixties, seventies and eighties have a duty to remind our children and grandchildren how it really was. Use your old photgraphs to prove it.
@brianwillson9567 I moved from an industrial town in the Wirral to North Everington when I went to college in 1989. A bit of an eye opener to say the least 😂
what reasonable excuse could these people possibly have for using a photo from a completely different country when referring to England? Complete insanity.
When New Scientist started to transform in to a vaguely science based lifestyle messaging magazine rather than a pure science publication I cancelled my sub.
maybe at the same time when _History_ Channel started to trasform into Ufo theories hub ? :D I dont mind research on the topic mind you, I like the topic, but I dont think thats how HISTORY Channel should be like :D
@@davidroyston1671 No, it's started at Frankfurt University. The creators of this Marxist nonsense belonged to a well known tribe, and when the Austrian painter came to power fled to Columbia University in America. So technically it comes from America, but the ideas behind it come German Marxists
@@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebb Sir Bernard Gray (ex chief of defence procurement) took over the magazine and it went downhill from there. The only conservative appointment Blair kept on. Hmm. His record needs more scrutiny than it's getting.
If it helps us deal with the future, so be it. Black people are going to be part of our future pushing the narrative they don't belong here is actually dangerous as well. 3:51 l@@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebb
If all the things that people in this channel's comments section demanded should be crimes worthy of imprisonment were actual crimes, very few people wouldn't be doing stir.
@@ShanghaiRooster lots of things are crimes NOT worthy of imprisonment already, slander and libel for instance. Would it suit you better if people clarified that they mean 'NOT worthy of imprisonment? Although TR was imprisoned for basically that, repeating prohibited information. But that's your side doing that, so it's ok, isn't it?
Hey now, if you believe the blacks they were the original Egyptians who built the pyramids. The arabs stole it all from them. Didn't they also build Europe and America and were the original Japanese? Some say the Romans were black too. What would the planet be without blacks?
October 14th 2066. To celebrate the millennia anniversary of the Battle of Hastings the BBC stages a reenactment. The brave black Normans defeat the far right Anglo Saxons. A joke perhaps? In 2017 the BBC broadcast a drama/ documentary called 1066 A year to conquer England. The real Robert de Beaumont was played by a black actor Jotham Annan.
Hence why ZERO black people can trace their family back even a couple of generations in the UK.........and why they celebrate Windrush at all! Go figure. 🤣
They do the same thing here in Northern Ireland, blacks in every advert in shops and such . A mayor of Londonderry/ Derry is an African women who came as a so-called refugee 14 years ago. She likes to call us all racist at every opportunity
@@williammkyddeShe was installed by her party without a vote. Two other indigenous candidates protested the lack of democratic process but were ignored.
Derry is a globalist hole. That's why Pelosi, Dalai Lama , Clintons and other monsters love it so much. They must have a temple there. Agree with you on everything.
@@markfox1545 Show me the video footage, show me the photographs from before the late 1940s. When you say a few maybe a very tiny amount yes. Most people in Britain hadn't seen a black person until the 1950s or 60s even later for many people, Britain still had a 99.9% White population in 1951 according to the census, here's a link to a wikipedia census there's a moving pie chart about two thirds of the way down the page showing these demographic changes over the last 70 years or so from 1951 onwards. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_Kingdom
We need an Indigenous “Anglo Celtic, Culture, History and identity protection Act.” So that nothing is taught, depicted or portrayed that is Fictitiously against us.
If they always lived in Britain why do they make such a thing about Windrush.I now see they have rewritten The day of the Jackal to have a young black women take over the role of Micheal Lonsdale from the 1973 original.The original film is excellent with a stellar cast,the Netflix remake looks like an abomination.
Not only is she mis representing the original characters, she is a very poor actress, I am not a fan of Eddie Redmayne, and probably would not have watched the remake, but my wife wanted to watch it, however, I was pleasantly surprised at how good Eddie Redmayne was in the role, and the production seemed ok, but the non acting lead woman spoiled the show, not because she is black, but because her acting is so wooden, facial expressions do not match the emotions that are supposed to be conveyed, spoiled the experience for me, but no doubt I shall be targeted as a racist for giving an honest opinion.
@normansidey5258 the original is a masterpiece and the only blacks in it I remember are some in the Paris crowds not 1 character is black they are all white Frenchies and English
I don’t think it’s Netflix, but whatever. There may be a valid box-office reason for casting Redmayne, who I’m sure is good in this, but they surely missed a trick(imo) in casting, as the perfect actor to play the ‘Jackal’ would have been - Freddie Fox! Yes Edward’s son! If he had been available and offered it, what a fantastic reboot connection that would have been! His chilling performance as Jeremy Bamber in the tv drama ‘White House Farm’ (2020) was incredible and if he had been cast as the ‘Jackal’, this would have been the perfect ‘boost’ to his career on the big screen that surely he deserves.
Watched the start last night. Well I never, a "German far right politician" assassinated. Whose wet dream is that? Then Blax appeared and I switched off.
Advertisers bore me with an excess of black faces. I was alive in the fifties and there were no black people around. Inserting black people into my history is simply a lie. Inserting an excess into tv and adverts is tedious trying to shove it in my face.
I can recall as a very young kid , early 60's aged 7 or so, my mum wirked part time in a classic working mans club, it was a great shock when a black face was seen in the club (afrocarib face) in uk in most if not all towns and cities, the afro carib community was very small, and in many places a black face was never seen until possibly the 70's and that face would have been asian
Exactly how I remember that same time period growing up in Glasgow. There was one Pakistani boy and one Indian girl in the entire school, twenty years later there was not one white face in the entire school.
As a scientist, I assure you that the New Scientist is not populated by scientists, and mostlt engages in anecdotes. You'll see no raw data, design,methodology, statistical tests, what p was set at, no statement of theory operationalised into a hypothesis, no literature review, nichts. Only fluffy anecdotes.
I remember looking at a copy of New Scientist in a shop - it's too expensive to buy - some time ago, and being confused by the description of an article's author as "they." I had to reread it a number of times before I realised that this was the new use of the word they. Since then I haven't even bothered to look at it.
"Black people shoe-horned into British history", you say. Not just British history, but show-horned into every corner of British society. Younger citizens might be being brain washed into this false reality but I, and everyone of my generation, know that the only reason this is happening is make up for the lack of natural talent. ESG and woke policies of Government, media and corporations require black people to be given an artificial, exaggerated leg up, which, quite frankly, is now so absurd that even young people must see the complete disconnect between what they see on the television and media compared with reality. If I were a black person the elevation of my race into every part of British life, and especially British history, is not just obviously false but very demeaning and patronising.
@@theenglishman8668 How is it that nearly all the races that have come to this country have made something of themselves yet blacks who apparently have been here forever, haven't achieved anything.
yes, but once you kick the proverbial bucket, future generations won't have access to you. The fact that they are still publishing means that someone is reading it.
@@everest9707 Got a lot of my knowledge gardening for the old generation in the 80's , i was a teenager then , I miss them so much , most were born in the 1890's.
@@jamesleonard7439 you were fortunate to have that experience. Once a generation is gone, it is gone forever. This is why it is so important to combat false history, as Simon does. I am already missing being able to talk with people who lived through WW2. Relying on books or documentaries is nowhere near as good as talking with people.
I've been reading Scientific American from 90s to 2008 or about this time. And at this time I've noticed only one "woke" paper about transgenderism. But at this time I would never imagine how big political ideology this will become, around 2008 I just thought its only a topic in the area of medicine and psychology and thats all :)
"but it will never be the truth". Wrong! When all the documents have been falsified and no one who remembers differently is still alive, the truth will be whatever the establishment wants it to be.
It really only matters if the text of the piece conveys the same false ideas. I doubt many New Scientist readers don't get beyond the pretty pictures therein.
@Bartholomew_Musgrave I hate foreign references to cultural phenomena that have no relevance to us. It is the point of this video. A 'boomer', or any other American terminology, just shows ignorance and disdain for your own culture.
@@Excession-h6e A boomer living such a sheltered life that he doesn’t realise that boomer is an absolutely ubiquitous online term, and that online terms don’t respect national borders. You couldn’t be more of a boomer or have said such a clueless boomer thing.
@Bartholomew_Musgrave One thing you learn much too late in life is how much of a grip on reality the older generations have and had. You'll find out yourself one day, to your regret. You'll look back at comments such as these and wince. How do I know? Because I do 40 years later when I think back to the twaddle I spouted. Just as you will.
Most American communities in the 1940s didn't even look like that. NYC was 94% W in 1940, for example. That was most likely taken in a Southern US state.
Truth should always be our watchword. The assault on truth whether in the arts and culture, in literature and history, or in the sciences, should worry us all.
Mr. Webb, New Culture Forum have a couple of videos out recently which seem to align with your recent look at Hope Not Hate funding and Kemi Badenoch’s suitability to lead the Conservative Party!
Gave up on New Scientist almost two decades ago. I understand that most serious scientists ( as opposed to pseudoscientists) gave up on many years before that. The opinion pieces by AC Grayling (I think was his name) used to all but get me frothing at the mouth. 😱😱😱😱
They dont realise it yet but it leads to the Gulag weve already seen people 8mprisoned for saying words shouting at pol8ce dogs and in T Robinsons case stating facts Thank you for your contructive observations Simon you are a sxholar and gentleman Bravo
They never think it will come for them. One day they're the ones condemning "enemies of the state/cause/ideology" the next they themselves are being taken to Kommunarka.
My family moved from Hertfordshire to the midlands in the late 50s. I remember going to John Lewis in Birmingham and my mum pointed out a little girl and saying oh look at that pikini girl, can't move for them now!
i had a two mixed friends the only non whites in the school , one had a black father the other a pakistani , neither were around , it was rare too in those days to have single mothers , early 80's
@@martinjackman2943 What are you talking about? I'm on about my little friend Pierre I met there on holiday last year. He was wise, but vertically challenged.
Simon, I'm pretty sure that just about everyone at New Scientist knows that the photograph doesn't show the UK in the 1940s. My guess is that it was chosen for the reason you suggest - it's just the "done thing" to make sure photos are "diverse". I also think many of the staff think it's ridiculous but haven't got the guts to speak up and in today's atmosphere I can't really blame them.
As a former research scientist i used to look forward to reading New Scientist magazine in the common room on a Thursday. I haven't read it for many years as it had become a mouthpiece for the 'science is settled' ideology of global warming and the insidious creep of cultural Marxist ideology into many other scientific areas. It has become like a high brow version of Viz magazine now, and totally discredited.
And yet my village has doubled in Size in 20 years, yet out of 6k we have around a hundred/ Two hundred that could potentially be called Non British, our kids don't see the problem first hand..unfortunately they soon will 😢
The buildings shown in the background of that Getty image reveal it to be America never mind the disproportionate number of black people. Even their clothes mark them out as not British.
I subscribed to the NS for about 15 years, but cancelled it in the mid noughties. This was because the scientific content was taking 2nd place to their evangelising about stuff like climate change and a tendency to wade into US politics on the side of the 'progressives'. I was offered a 10 week for a tenner online sub, which I've taken up, and they're just as bad but have also removed article's comments section so no dissenting opinions can be expressed! It gets cancelled again when the 10 weeks is up.
How very dishonest of them. And how predictable too. They were saying they "owned" the science four years ago. In the case of the uk, I would think sugar rationing being a boon for people's health would have been offset by a shortage of meat and protein in the diet. Powered egg was no substitute for real eggs. My parents who were children during the war both had lost all their teeth by early adulthood, so what does that tell you?!
Parents must tell their children the truth as opposed to what schools teach their children. I am a grandmother of 68 yrs and my children have seen my school photographs, there were no black children in the photos until I went to secondary school, and if my memory serves me well, we had 3 black children in the whole school, two boys who were brothers and one girl. Post war schools had Jewish children, Ukrainian, and Lithuanian children who were all English but had war refugee parents. It's a little difficult to change history when we can prove they're lying.
Hello again Simon. I held up a chart from the American Food Agency and received a week's ban. It was the one which placed a certain breakfast cereal at the top and steak at the bottom.
In the 1965 James Bond book, "Man With A Golden Gun," Ian Fleming describes a trip Bond made through American South. He describes witnesses the many issues United States was facing as they struggled with assimilating its massive black population into polite society. Bond remarks about how Great Britain, with its lack of diversity, was fortunate to have avoided the monumental mistake of importing so many Africans.
The wartime diet was the best this country ever had. People must understand that Britain is and has never been like the US. America is a nation of immigrants, Britain hasn't been for a 1000 years.
I cancelled my subscription to New Scientist many years ago when they refused to accept material from those who disagreed with the B/S man made climate change mantra.
The sad fact is Simon that all parts of the establishment have been infiltrated by this ideology. Just because the New Scientist features articles written by scientists does not mean that the features editors etc will be, they have probably studied media at university which means they would be heavily indoctorinated in left wing politics and wokeism, like most other people in the media these days. Most publications relating to technical matters carry these messages these days too. Engineers and technicians are nearly always portrayed as being female and more often or not black, from the Indian sub continent or oriental. I worked in engineering for over fifty years and that was certainly not my experience though their was the odd exception. To be honest I was actually a bit surprised that so few women took it up as a profession, but then again compared with being a lawyer, accountant, etc. engineers in Britain aren't anywhere near the top of the salary scales.
It's totally beyond my comprehension that anyone would put their faith in a popular science magazine, let alone read one. After the Climate con and the Pantodemic? Do me a favour.
Now we have a “new” labour regime, does Simon feel a piece from the New Scientist exhorting the benefits of rationing in Britain a coincidence? They refused to abolish rationing in the 1951 election and were despised by ordinary people who felt the state crushing their throats by restricting what food they could eat. This resulted in thirteen years of Conservative government,who when elected in 1951, abolished rationing the day after the election. My grandmother for one, NEVER forgave labour.
It is very interesting, but maybe not very surprising. Some years ago a book was publsihed in Germany with the title: "Deutschland scafft sich selbst ab". In English it would be "Germany is abolishing itself". Except of course that today it looks like as England in fact is on the road to abolishing itself. A good start is to rewrite English history. The next step could be to burn the older books that tells a different story from the officially approved history? I am not saying that this would happen, but if someone starts to tamper with our history to present a complete untrue picture of the past, then we probably have a problem.
![BOWKYLION - วิงวอน (ex-change) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cLdnZWDaO-w/mqdefault.jpg)
Its called gaslighting us
It's called anti White bullshit!
No it's not: you do not know the origins and real meaning of the phrase, do you? If you ever get the chance to see it, it is an excellent play.
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. " Orwell, 1984
"One believes things because one has been conditioned to believe them." - Aldous Huxley
@@gijgij4541 So it isn't a euphemism for lighting farts, then?
New Scientist is getting more like the Beano year by year.
Beano is a better read
Even the Beano is woke these days mate.
@@Occident.
Walter has become leader of Stonewall, and Dennis jailed for contempt of court.
Must be long time since you read it mate? Dennis is transitioning now mate. He's been on puberty blockers for months. He's going by the name Denise these days. @@ChimpingBulldog
@@Occident.Don't tell me Gnasher is a poodle now ! 😂
Those of us who are old enough to remeber what it was like to grow up in the sixties, seventies and eighties have a duty to remind our children and grandchildren how it really was. Use your old photgraphs to prove it.
Compared to now this place was a paradise then.
I do mate.
Leicester was one of those places which had already fallen by 1980.
Yes, but the problem is they are indoctrinated at school and don't believe it!!
@brianwillson9567
I moved from an industrial town in the Wirral to North Everington when I went to college in 1989.
A bit of an eye opener to say the least 😂
Born in 1950 I didn't see a black face until August1964, what a shock to the system!
what reasonable excuse could these people possibly have for using a photo from a completely different country when referring to England? Complete insanity.
None.
To misguide our youth.🤔
They don't need a reason. Who's really gonna stand up to these lunatics
It’s to reinforce a lie to a generation too young to remember when England was English.
"One believes things because one has been conditioned to believe them." - Aldous Huxley
New Scientist Magazine, soft, strong and thoroughly absorbent.
Should be right up your alley lol
not as good as the koran.
😂
When New Scientist started to transform in to a vaguely science based lifestyle messaging magazine rather than a pure science publication I cancelled my sub.
Me too.
Lots of Jorge mosses and tom highams to.keep buying it
maybe at the same time when _History_ Channel started to trasform into Ufo theories hub ? :D I dont mind research on the topic mind you, I like the topic, but I dont think thats how HISTORY Channel should be like :D
I stopped reading NS years ago. It was already bothering me with bias 10 years ago.
I used to like it.
Haven’t read it in 20 years.
The UK, becoming less relevent one decision at a time
....with the hand rubbing intensifying.
All this woke crap started in America.
@@Occident. Stop it then or you will go blind.
@@davidroyston1671 No, it's started at Frankfurt University. The creators of this Marxist nonsense belonged to a well known tribe, and when the Austrian painter came to power fled to Columbia University in America.
So technically it comes from America, but the ideas behind it come German Marxists
@@davidroyston1671 Weimar Republic in Germany?
That’s the New Scientist magazine for you, it went like this several years ago I’m surprised ordinary folks still by it.
It's an old habit, I know how it's gone down hill!
@@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebb Sir Bernard Gray (ex chief of defence procurement) took over the magazine and it went downhill from there. The only conservative appointment Blair kept on. Hmm. His record needs more scrutiny than it's getting.
@@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebbSorry to interrupt.
Simon, you need to read Frank Furedi's latest book, The War Against The Past.
Farage for PM
If it helps us deal with the future, so be it. Black people are going to be part of our future pushing the narrative they don't belong here is actually dangerous as well. 3:51 l@@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebb
It should be a crime to do this unless the publication is marked as fiction.
Right wing sites write fiction every day...masquerading as truth....
If all the things that people in this channel's comments section demanded should be crimes worthy of imprisonment were actual crimes, very few people wouldn't be doing stir.
They cry all day about disinformation so according to their rules it should be
@@ShanghaiRoosternot our rules though. It's the leftists rules
@@ShanghaiRooster lots of things are crimes NOT worthy of imprisonment already, slander and libel for instance. Would it suit you better if people clarified that they mean 'NOT worthy of imprisonment?
Although TR was imprisoned for basically that, repeating prohibited information. But that's your side doing that, so it's ok, isn't it?
One has to admire all the amazing mud huts though...
and don't forget AID's the gift that keeps on giving...
Hey now, if you believe the blacks they were the original Egyptians who built the pyramids. The arabs stole it all from them. Didn't they also build Europe and America and were the original Japanese? Some say the Romans were black too. What would the planet be without blacks?
@@The_Reality_Filter And now Monkey Pox, bums to the wall chaps!
Presumably after admiring the thatching
🙉
Oliver Cromwell was Nigerian with the Pope was Chinese.
Coming soon to Netflix, no doubt.
In the 2024 film 'Conclave' a trans pope is elected.
@@ChimpingBulldog No... BBC getting there first.
October 14th 2066. To celebrate the millennia anniversary of the Battle of Hastings the BBC stages a reenactment. The brave black Normans defeat the far right Anglo Saxons. A joke perhaps? In 2017 the BBC broadcast a drama/ documentary called 1066 A year to conquer England. The real Robert de Beaumont was played by a black actor Jotham Annan.
@JS64100 this isn't going to stop 😢
Should be re-named 'New Wokist"
Among many other things going on now this is right out of 1984. The rewriting of history. How are we letting this happen.
2+2=5
@@TheGodParticle The square root of minus one?.
The Bum’s Rush hadn’t even arrived - so the number of black people in our country was negligible
Ya mon
Hence why ZERO black people can trace their family back even a couple of generations in the UK.........and why they celebrate Windrush at all!
Go figure. 🤣
The covid farce showed them they could do what they want and the plebs would show no resistance, then the invasion began......
The covid hysteria illustrated how the plebs would simply do as they were told with no resistance, then the invasion began.....
@@davidmclachlan6592 An experiment conducted by the State testing how compliant the people really are. The sheeple complied obediently.
They do the same thing here in Northern Ireland, blacks in every advert in shops and such .
A mayor of Londonderry/ Derry is an African women who came as a so-called refugee 14 years ago.
She likes to call us all racist at every opportunity
Somebody voted for her. Who's to blame?
Most people tend to ignore municipal elections. That's how one ends up with a sadic khan and the like.
@@williammkyddeShe was installed by her party without a vote. Two other indigenous candidates protested the lack of democratic process but were ignored.
Derry is a globalist hole. That's why Pelosi, Dalai Lama , Clintons and other monsters love it so much. They must have a temple there. Agree with you on everything.
As long as she's a Presbyterian it's all good 😂
The black population of Britain in 1942 was zero the facts are there it's common knowlege.
No, it's your error. There were undoubtedly a few.
@@markfox1545 Show me the video footage, show me the photographs from before the late 1940s. When you say a few maybe a very tiny amount yes. Most people in Britain hadn't seen a black person until the 1950s or 60s even later for many people, Britain still had a 99.9% White population in 1951 according to the census, here's a link to a wikipedia census there's a moving pie chart about two thirds of the way down the page showing these demographic changes over the last 70 years or so from 1951 onwards. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_Kingdom
I hope you write a letter to the editor, Simon.
Indeed I have!
@@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebbI'd ask someone literate to check the spelling first, Si.
LOL
@@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebb
Good for you Simon. Most people wouldn't bother.
@@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebb Expect to be called a science denier even though it has nothing to do with science.
@@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebb New Scientist are using a different photograph for the online version of the article.
We need an Indigenous “Anglo Celtic, Culture, History and identity protection Act.” So that nothing is taught, depicted or portrayed that is Fictitiously against us.
I'm sticking with books from 20th century
They'll have to pry my Flashman collection from my cold dead fingers
I tend to go for books that are written pre-1950, with some exceptions.
I m sticking with books from 30 centuries of European lore :D
I don't buy history , science or social science books under 12 years old
The further back you go, the more the "history" changes.
Fortunately there are still enough people alive who know the truth, because we lived it.!
All you have to watch are television adverts to see whats going on x
Cancel your subscription to The New Scientist, you would be better reading Viz 👍😂
You're always better off for reading Viz...
Has the viz not gone woke yet?
If they always lived in Britain why do they make such a thing about Windrush.I now see they have rewritten The day of the Jackal to have a young black women take over the role of Micheal Lonsdale from the 1973 original.The original film is excellent with a stellar cast,the Netflix remake looks like an abomination.
Not only is she mis representing the original characters, she is a very poor actress, I am not a fan of Eddie Redmayne, and probably would not have watched the remake, but my wife wanted to watch it, however, I was pleasantly surprised at how good Eddie Redmayne was in the role, and the production seemed ok, but the non acting lead woman spoiled the show, not because she is black, but because her acting is so wooden, facial expressions do not match the emotions that are supposed to be conveyed, spoiled the experience for me, but no doubt I shall be targeted as a racist for giving an honest opinion.
@normansidey5258 the original is a masterpiece and the only blacks in it I remember are some in the Paris crowds not 1 character is black they are all white Frenchies and English
I don’t think it’s Netflix, but whatever. There may be a valid box-office reason for casting Redmayne, who I’m sure is good in this, but they surely missed a trick(imo) in casting, as the perfect actor to play the ‘Jackal’ would have been - Freddie Fox! Yes Edward’s son!
If he had been available and offered it, what a fantastic reboot connection that would have been! His chilling performance as Jeremy Bamber in the tv drama ‘White House Farm’ (2020) was incredible and if he had been cast as the ‘Jackal’, this would have been the perfect ‘boost’ to his career on the big screen that surely he deserves.
Watched the start last night. Well I never, a "German far right politician" assassinated. Whose wet dream is that? Then Blax appeared and I switched off.
@@Puffball-ll1lyBest political film out there.
Advertisers bore me with an excess of black faces. I was alive in the fifties and there were no black people around. Inserting black people into my history is simply a lie. Inserting an excess into tv and adverts is tedious trying to shove it in my face.
I was alive in the Fifties and there were very few coloured people. In school, work or entertainment.
New Scientist nose-dived years ago.
Here in Northern Ireland the digital film archives made an appeal to the public for more diverse public film as it is not diverse enough.
Well it's either Black and White or Colour film and either way look who gets top billing. 😅
I can recall as a very young kid , early 60's aged 7 or so, my mum wirked part time in a classic working mans club, it was a great shock when a black face was seen in the club (afrocarib face) in uk in most if not all towns and cities, the afro carib community was very small, and in many places a black face was never seen until possibly the 70's and that face would have been asian
Exactly how I remember that same time period growing up in Glasgow. There was one Pakistani boy and one Indian girl in the entire school, twenty years later there was not one white face in the entire school.
As a scientist, I assure you that the New Scientist is not populated by scientists, and mostlt engages in anecdotes. You'll see no raw data, design,methodology, statistical tests, what p was set at, no statement of theory operationalised into a hypothesis, no literature review, nichts. Only fluffy anecdotes.
It will seem surprising today, but in the 80s it was quite respected. Now it is the stuff of Sunday supplements.
I've just come back from fishing and wonder how confident you are that you know what p is and its significance? Regards K. Pearson.
It is essential to raise a generation of young people who question everything and practice a healthy skepticism.
I remember looking at a copy of New Scientist in a shop - it's too expensive to buy - some time ago, and being confused by the description of an article's author as "they." I had to reread it a number of times before I realised that this was the new use of the word they.
Since then I haven't even bothered to look at it.
"Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past." - You know who.
I recall Kamala Harris wanting to be "unburdened by the past".
All part of the agenda.
🎯🎯🎯
'The Master Plan.'
always their plan....🔯🔯🔯
Historically, many black people in Britain.
Hmm...Britain would never have made it as a developed country.
"Black people shoe-horned into British history", you say. Not just British history, but show-horned into every corner of British society. Younger citizens might be being brain washed into this false reality but I, and everyone of my generation, know that the only reason this is happening is make up for the lack of natural talent. ESG and woke policies of Government, media and corporations require black people to be given an artificial, exaggerated leg up, which, quite frankly, is now so absurd that even young people must see the complete disconnect between what they see on the television and media compared with reality. If I were a black person the elevation of my race into every part of British life, and especially British history, is not just obviously false but very demeaning and patronising.
From an African Town in Northern England. Our Nigerians are starting to complain about , the number of White People in the town
Hang in there, you'll get special treatment soon, when you qualify as persecuted minority status
i think your intro is far funnier then Simons'
Not as much as simon I hope ' ?
Must be because of all those engineers, scientists, doctors, professors, mathematicians, and general good eggs coming over on the rubber boats.
You forgot to mention da entrepreneurs.
@@theenglishman8668 How is it that nearly all the races that have come to this country have made something of themselves yet blacks who apparently have been here forever, haven't achieved anything.
Architects also ! @@theenglishman8668
No! It's because of the jews!
I prefer The Old Scientist who decries BS.
As soon as I see their idea of history I turn off, or stop reading their crap.
🪒 Smash the 'UNSUBSCRIBE BUTTON' 🪒
It will be replaced with something far superior. Ideas are bullet proof
It's called lies.
Its about time something was done to stop these idiots from doing this.
My memory is much more accurate than some stupid magazine , who reads that rag anymore anyway?.
yes, but once you kick the proverbial bucket, future generations won't have access to you.
The fact that they are still publishing means that someone is reading it.
@@everest9707
Even worse, believing it.
@@everest9707 Got a lot of my knowledge gardening for the old generation in the 80's , i was a teenager then , I miss them so much , most were born in the 1890's.
@@jamesleonard7439 you were fortunate to have that experience.
Once a generation is gone, it is gone forever.
This is why it is so important to combat false history, as Simon does.
I am already missing being able to talk with people who lived through WW2. Relying on books or documentaries is nowhere near as good as talking with people.
Scientific American and New Scientist went woke decades ago.
And Nature.
That's why I no longer read them.
science is up for the highest bidder...the USA has become one giant strip club......
I've been reading Scientific American from 90s to 2008 or about this time. And at this time I've noticed only one "woke" paper about transgenderism. But at this time I would never imagine how big political ideology this will become, around 2008 I just thought its only a topic in the area of medicine and psychology and thats all :)
@@TallisKeeton I've read SciAm since the 1960's and gave up late 1990's when it started pushing woke projects and politics.
A good reason NOT to buy New Scientist magazine
I used to read New Scientist regularly. They printed one of my letters once, but "edited " so that it badly misrepresented my point.
They can write it whichever way they want but it will never be the truth
When no one living remembers different though.
Sadly, perception of truth is far more important than actual truth.
"but it will never be the truth". Wrong! When all the documents have been falsified and no one who remembers differently is still alive, the truth will be whatever the establishment wants it to be.
Yes it will,your kids will never know any different.
It really only matters if the text of the piece conveys the same false ideas. I doubt many New Scientist readers don't get beyond the pretty pictures therein.
They have all been captured.
It slips in quietly:commercial of a black man in full plate European medieval armour wielding a sword.
Thank God I'm seventy & don't have kids. Everything I value is being destroyed.
This kind of comment is why people hate boomers.
@@Bartholomew_Musgrave I'm not to kean on immature twits 🙂
@Bartholomew_Musgrave I hate foreign references to cultural phenomena that have no relevance to us. It is the point of this video. A 'boomer', or any other American terminology, just shows ignorance and disdain for your own culture.
@@Excession-h6e A boomer living such a sheltered life that he doesn’t realise that boomer is an absolutely ubiquitous online term, and that online terms don’t respect national borders.
You couldn’t be more of a boomer or have said such a clueless boomer thing.
@Bartholomew_Musgrave One thing you learn much too late in life is how much of a grip on reality the older generations have and had. You'll find out yourself one day, to your regret. You'll look back at comments such as these and wince. How do I know? Because I do 40 years later when I think back to the twaddle I spouted. Just as you will.
Most American communities in the 1940s didn't even look like that. NYC was 94% W in 1940, for example. That was most likely taken in a Southern US state.
Truth should always be our watchword. The assault on truth whether in the arts and culture, in literature and history, or in the sciences, should worry us all.
Mr. Webb, New Culture Forum have a couple of videos out recently which seem to align with your recent look at Hope Not Hate funding and Kemi Badenoch’s suitability to lead the Conservative Party!
I shall have a look.
@@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebbAnother echo chamber for you, Si.
LOL
@@candy-le4nhhow is your echo chamber going?
@@candy-le4nhyou really are a fool,
@@candy-le4nh Another drivel from you, sweetie...
LOL
Gave up on New Scientist almost two decades ago. I understand that most serious scientists ( as opposed to pseudoscientists) gave up on many years before that. The opinion pieces by AC Grayling (I think was his name) used to all but get me frothing at the mouth. 😱😱😱😱
Modern History lies - on the body of buried truth.
BBC Confirmed here.
We support this narrative and believe it to be authentic.😂
the photo is from 1942 and a queue for sugar rationing
William de Conqueror, brought his army to Britain, on the Empire Windrush.
Just watch 'A Welcome to Britain, 1943' from the US archives for a more informative view of the time.
They dont realise it yet but it leads to the Gulag weve already seen people 8mprisoned for saying words shouting at pol8ce dogs and in T Robinsons case stating facts Thank you for your contructive observations Simon you are a sxholar and gentleman Bravo
One fine fellow doing two years for printing stickers, that even the prosecution admitted were legal.
They never think it will come for them. One day they're the ones condemning "enemies of the state/cause/ideology" the next they themselves are being taken to Kommunarka.
He also refuses to admit that the masterminds behind all this are responsible.
My family moved from Hertfordshire to the midlands in the late 50s. I remember going to John Lewis in Birmingham and my mum pointed out a little girl and saying oh look at that pikini girl, can't move for them now!
Pikinini was a common term used to describe coloured children. Rather outdated now.
The pendulum has reached it's apex and is now on it's return run.
A pendulum is little different from a wrecking ball.
I hope you're right.
It wasn't till the late sixties that I saw my first non-white face, and that was a person from the Indian subcontinent not afri-caribbean.
i had a two mixed friends the only non whites in the school , one had a black father the other a pakistani , neither were around , it was rare too in those days to have single mothers , early 80's
I always tell young people the truth when ever I can. Surprisingly many do know they are being fed lies, which is encouraging.
Afternoon Simon.
Good afternoon!
Never let THEM re-write YOUR history. The elephant is waking up.
"History is a set of lies agreed upon", a wee Corsican guy.
@@jocktheripper2073 Napoleon was talking about the state of history in his time. Not suggesting how it SHOULD be.
Oy vey.
@@hightierplayers2454
May the elephant caress them with his toes.
@@martinjackman2943 What are you talking about? I'm on about my little friend Pierre I met there on holiday last year.
He was wise, but vertically challenged.
What amazes me is that seemingly no black person has called this out as being untrue and patronising.
They are embarrassed.
They are the first to think that the ancient Egyptians, Romans and Greeks were black Africans!
You mean no celebrity 😅, I call this nonsense out all the time.
@M.B.331 only the uneducated ones.
I didn't see a black face untill the 1970s, and he was a miner!😊😊😊
Just part of the propaganda machine
Simon, I'm pretty sure that just about everyone at New Scientist knows that the photograph doesn't show the UK in the 1940s. My guess is that it was chosen for the reason you suggest - it's just the "done thing" to make sure photos are "diverse". I also think many of the staff think it's ridiculous but haven't got the guts to speak up and in today's atmosphere I can't really blame them.
As a former research scientist i used to look forward to reading New Scientist magazine in the common room on a Thursday. I haven't read it for many years as it had become a mouthpiece for the 'science is settled' ideology of global warming and the insidious creep of cultural Marxist ideology into many other scientific areas. It has become like a high brow version of Viz magazine now, and totally discredited.
And yet my village has doubled in Size in 20 years, yet out of 6k we have around a hundred/ Two hundred that could potentially be called Non British, our kids don't see the problem first hand..unfortunately they soon will 😢
What problem? Be specific.
LOL
@candy-le4nh 😆 🤣 😂 😹
@@Jaymark-gk4li So you've absolutely no idea.
Thanks for the confirmation.
LOL
@@candy-le4nh I’m reporting every comment you make
@@bestcrazyboy8487 Reporting me for what? Be specific.
LOL
The buildings shown in the background of that Getty image reveal it to be America never mind the disproportionate number of black people. Even their clothes mark them out as not British.
I used to read that Magazine and hope it was truthful at the time.
Scientists usually agree with whomever is funding them!
Money Talks,.... sadly.
Einstein was from the `ivory `coast. Didn’t you know?
I subscribed to the NS for about 15 years, but cancelled it in the mid noughties. This was because the scientific content was taking 2nd place to their evangelising about stuff like climate change and a tendency to wade into US politics on the side of the 'progressives'.
I was offered a 10 week for a tenner online sub, which I've taken up, and they're just as bad but have also removed article's comments section so no dissenting opinions can be expressed! It gets cancelled again when the 10 weeks is up.
Been doing the rounds that sugar story.
The drama on Sky about Guy Fawkes has Robert Catesby played by a black actor.
Not surprised since Sky was bought by an American company and woke is their god.
I used to like New Scientist, but I probably stopped buying it 15 years ago. It'd started to become anti science even back then.
Science in which I desperately still have faith is under attack from many sides.
How very dishonest of them. And how predictable too. They were saying they "owned" the science four years ago. In the case of the uk, I would think sugar rationing being a boon for people's health would have been offset by a shortage of meat and protein in the diet. Powered egg was no substitute for real eggs. My parents who were children during the war both had lost all their teeth by early adulthood, so what does that tell you?!
"Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past."
Parents must tell their children the truth as opposed to what schools teach their children.
I am a grandmother of 68 yrs and my children have seen my school photographs, there were no black children in the photos until I went to secondary school, and if my memory serves me well, we had 3 black children in the whole school, two boys who were brothers and one girl.
Post war schools had Jewish children, Ukrainian, and Lithuanian children who were all English but had war refugee parents.
It's a little difficult to change history when we can prove they're lying.
Would it be easier to understand if they changed the name of their publication to "New Communist Magazine"?
🤣
@@lairdkilbarchan
Witchdoctor's Quarterly...the way it's going...💀👹🦴🍄🐍🦇🦂
Thanks
Hello again Simon. I held up a chart from the American Food Agency and received a week's ban.
It was the one which placed a certain breakfast cereal at the top and steak at the bottom.
Another fine example of the sacrifice of science on the altar of DEI.
When you see the prefix "New", don't touch it with an old barge pole!
That picture is from a You Tube Video FDR and WWII, Part 3, The Home Front.
It is 100% not Britain.
In the 1965 James Bond book, "Man With A Golden Gun," Ian Fleming describes a trip Bond made through American South. He describes witnesses the many issues United States was facing as they struggled with assimilating its massive black population into polite society. Bond remarks about how Great Britain, with its lack of diversity, was fortunate to have avoided the monumental mistake of importing so many Africans.
If a lie is repeated often enough it becomes the truth. Dr Joseph Goebbels.
I noticed that photo in NS today and wondered where it came from.
I recently heard that Pompeii was very diverse and progressive.
The DM today has a story that one pair of preserved bodies were gay. Despite there being no evidence for that of course.
@@manicminer-o3j The/They Daily Mail.
Titter ye not.
The wartime diet was the best this country ever had. People must understand that Britain is and has never been like the US. America is a nation of immigrants, Britain hasn't been for a 1000 years.
I cancelled my subscription to New Scientist many years ago when they refused to accept material from those who disagreed with the B/S man made climate change mantra.
The sad fact is Simon that all parts of the establishment have been infiltrated by this ideology. Just because the New Scientist features articles written by scientists does not mean that the features editors etc will be, they have probably studied media at university which means they would be heavily indoctorinated in left wing politics and wokeism, like most other people in the media these days. Most publications relating to technical matters carry these messages these days too. Engineers and technicians are nearly always portrayed as being female and more often or not black, from the Indian sub continent or oriental. I worked in engineering for over fifty years and that was certainly not my experience though their was the odd exception. To be honest I was actually a bit surprised that so few women took it up as a profession, but then again compared with being a lawyer, accountant, etc. engineers in Britain aren't anywhere near the top of the salary scales.
It's totally beyond my comprehension that anyone would put their faith in a popular science magazine, let alone read one. After the Climate con and the Pantodemic? Do me a favour.
Watch the new series of Wolf Hall on Sunday. See if it has been 'woked'.
Remember it is set in Tudor times.
Now we have a “new” labour regime, does Simon feel a piece from the New Scientist exhorting the benefits of rationing in Britain a coincidence? They refused to abolish rationing in the 1951 election and were despised by ordinary people who felt the state crushing their throats by restricting what food they could eat. This resulted in thirteen years of Conservative government,who when elected in 1951, abolished rationing the day after the election. My grandmother for one, NEVER forgave labour.
There was rationing until 1953. I have evidence to support this.
It is very interesting, but maybe not very surprising.
Some years ago a book was publsihed in Germany with the title: "Deutschland scafft sich selbst ab".
In English it would be "Germany is abolishing itself". Except of course that today it looks like as England in fact is on the road to abolishing itself.
A good start is to rewrite English history.
The next step could be to burn the older books that tells a different story from the officially approved history?
I am not saying that this would happen, but if someone starts to tamper with our history to present a complete untrue picture of the past, then we probably have a problem.
the germans have the AFD, we have a toolmakers son.