Hard vs Soft Beauty Dish Comparison

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 31

  • @LastXwitness
    @LastXwitness ปีที่แล้ว

    nice video Dan a lot of people do not realize how specific a beauty dish really is

  • @okeefest
    @okeefest ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I bought a soft beauty dish (two actually) and used the egg crate grid. I couldn’t understand, at first, why I was getting such an odd pattern on the background. Looking closely, I could see a slight pattern on the subject too. I realized that the egg crate grid was causing the issue. When the dish was placed at an angle, the egg crate cast a checkerboard like shadow. I bought a hard beauty dish with a hard grid and voila, no ugly shadows/patterns. If you need/want to use a grid to control the light, the hard beauty dish and grid is the way to go.

  • @merkin22
    @merkin22 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love such comparisons as they nicely (very) underline the 'look' one gets, generally with the modifier being used. Thanks, as always!

  • @Bloody1369
    @Bloody1369 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have used to Glow EZ Lock for a couple years. Once I got used to it I no longer use a regular softbox for the typical shooting I'm currently doing. Great video Daniel. Thanks!

  • @thomasriggs2914
    @thomasriggs2914 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very well done Daniel - you have identified subtle differences and their affect. Thank you! Even different brands of hard beauty dishes offer different light characteristics based on the contour and size you mentioned.

  • @josephchan4198
    @josephchan4198 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome!! Great content. If I had a business, I would consider the foldable beauty dish.

  • @DaveJay656
    @DaveJay656 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hmm, yeah, I agree 100%. Both do a good job with subtle differences. I like them both. Very helpful. Thanks Daniel.

  • @kennyrc51
    @kennyrc51 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the mettle beauty dish Work great I got the Adorama one with 3 grids and a sock Love using it!

  • @kennypringle4580
    @kennypringle4580 ปีที่แล้ว

    You always teach us valuable lessons. Good job👍

  • @rickjbradbury
    @rickjbradbury 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If I can I will take my solid beauty dish on location, just can not beat the look they give.
    21.6" white and silver versions with grids.

  • @AdamTV
    @AdamTV ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Could you clarify how the shallow dish shape affects the light quality compared to a regular Softbox.

  • @JamesBrownPhotographics
    @JamesBrownPhotographics ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Daniel, FWIW, I use a Speedotron BD with white interior and adapted it to other brands by replacing the speed ring mount. It is pretty much a clone of the Mola Demi which IMO is the benchmark for BD's. By swapping out the central diffuser with an opaque, diffuse or metal mesh I can change the contrast and look.

  • @3obardThawn3
    @3obardThawn3 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ur videos are always helpful... thank you

  • @andyvan5692
    @andyvan5692 ปีที่แล้ว

    yes, Daniel, they are the elinchrom ones, which have the "deflector set" in them, which can have silver, white, or diffused (1\2 a stop, as compared to the white's 1 stop); but it would be nice if you compared the elinchrom gear with the profoto as well, if you have had any experience with them.
    Also I miss marisa, you haven't done a lot with the "mentoring marisa" series lately, and love the fun and chemistry you and her have on the camera.

  • @alun7006
    @alun7006 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks, Daniel. I have recently acquired a used 16" beauty dish, but haven't had the opportunity to use it yet. It's not the most flexible modifier, as the subject has to keep pretty still. I need to practice with it!

  • @GTGeorgeW
    @GTGeorgeW ปีที่แล้ว

    I loved the comparison... maybe next time you could add a normal parabolic soft box in the mix .. to show the other side effect. Thanks Daniel for the teaching moment.

  • @goonswarm007
    @goonswarm007 ปีที่แล้ว

    But a dish makes every model smile 5:40 😂

  • @ronin5th
    @ronin5th ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the comparison. It could be another tool in the LX toolbox

  • @AndyMillerPhotoUK
    @AndyMillerPhotoUK ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice vid -- Well I greatly prefer the images from the hard dash over the rest. And yes the images taken soft dash with a diffuser look dull/flat in comparison to those from the hard dish.
    Hard dishes come in various sizes and unfinished and white - have you tried / compared them? Looking at profoto (others are the same) the spread varies depending on the depth of head position within the dish -- With the silver finish "Light spread: 26° at position 4 on ProHead"; whereas with the White dish "Light spread: 65° at position 4 on ProHead". Well at least according to profoto's web site that is. AND Output at 2 m with 2400Ws @ the white dish provides ISO100: f/32.4 at zoom position 4 (on ProHead); whereas the silver delivers @ ISO100: f/64.1 at zoom position 4 (on ProHead) -- reflecting the more concentration of light and higher reflectivity of the silver finish

  • @250157andyw
    @250157andyw ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does it matter that the Profoto B10 has a flat front compared to other makes which use a ‘bare bulb’ front in a beauty dish?

  • @andymcgarty3099
    @andymcgarty3099 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't think I've ever used a beauty dish in the studio. Lots of brollies and softboxes. Must look out for one next time I visit the studio and try it.

  • @andyvan5692
    @andyvan5692 ปีที่แล้ว

    also with the soft beauty dish would you add 1\2 to 1 stop more power to the light, to boost the face exposure, to the same luminance as the hard one?

  • @justinoff1
    @justinoff1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not using a pro head hurts my soul

  • @briefcasemanx
    @briefcasemanx ปีที่แล้ว

    There was no link to Cadence that I could see

  • @JohnChubbSr
    @JohnChubbSr 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why is it called a "beauty dish?"

  • @AdrianBacon
    @AdrianBacon ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm sure I'm the only one who has this position, but I just don't do beauty dishes. I don't know if it's just me or my typical style of lighting, but I just don't see the appeal of it over what I typically do. I know other photographers who swear by and rave about beauty dishes, but when I see many of the pictures that they produce with them, 9 times out of 10 my reaction is "um.... OK..." and that one time where I go "whoa" it's not necessarily because a beauty dish was used. I'm pretty sure I could spend the rest of my career never using a beauty dish and still be totally fine. That being said, there's nothing wrong with them, and if people want to use them, great, but it's just not my jam.

    • @ernie28ernie
      @ernie28ernie ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, I guess the same could be said about every light modifier out there. ;)
      I don't get these globes, but love my Mola Setti...

  • @jamesrobinson3663
    @jamesrobinson3663 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is a baseball sized dent required to properly light the model? 🤣

  • @plemas
    @plemas ปีที่แล้ว

    The most overrated of all modifiers Imho