A lesser interviewer would have shirked the important questions or did what media people usually do when sitting in front of a member of the royal family - tugged their forelocks and behaved obsequiously. Maitlis played her part superbly and deserves a huge amount of credit for a job well done.
Translation: I don't want to get in trouble and agree to taking down a member of the royal family Could see her thought process off "how do I word this"
@@Hazed64 she did a fantastic job of giving him enough rope. He did the rest by talking. She was careful to make sure she acknowledged her work questions research) i wouldn't be shocked if she was up for an award of the interview.
The interview was impeccable. The end where Emily asks the prince, if he has any final words? Perhaps a morsel of humility, empathy and consideration for the victims, he says “No, I don’t think so” smugly. It was horrific.
And did Prince Andrew really think the public and the media were going to believe him? Deluded man who hasn't been told "No" often enough. Spoilt, entitled, pompous and mendacious. Miss Maitlis gave him the rope and he hanged himself.
@@Ktc99999-b She went for the money because she couldn't provide the 'evidence' she claimed to have. It will be interesting to see what she does when the money has been spent. Allegedly she has a list of other men, including the likes of Bill Clinton. And what has happened about the allegtions that Virginia herself was involved in procuring girls for Epstein?
Well the family of the first Michael Jackson accusations accepted 20 million dollars. If that happened to one of my kids I wouldn’t have taken that money. Every time you step out of your Ferrari into your nice new big house you’re going to be reminded of how you got all this. It’s bull💩, I would prefer prison justice myself. People that like kids in that way have a wonderful time in prison.
Imagine being a Mail reader and getting red-faced furious, steaming from the ears over Meghan Markle, while Prince Andrew exists. It's a strange world.
Total admiration for her, her calm consistent tone and the timing of her precise questions was perfect, the way the revelations kept unfolding was testament to her impeccable interview talent
The whole interview was VERY professionally constructed & implemented. Viewers have freedom to accept what they believe. For me, he was exposed & truly discredited beyond doubt.
Very, very easy to recognise he was lying through the whole interview if you have any experience in interviewing guilty people. He clearly had none, so blindly dug his own grave. Bravo Emily for having the guts to do it.
Emily is one of the few journalists/reporters who is not afraid to ask the correct questions, even if it could cost her her career. I have nothing, but admiration for her, it’s a pity other so called journalists couldn’t be more like her!
Lol, get back in the knife nox, Miss Sharp. Maitless at the time she filmed this had a career spanning over 30 years. She’s had a heavyweight career in several countries, made many odocumentaries, covered hard news, was an editor of the Spectator, and spent well over a decade on the most heavyweight political show the BBC ever had, eventually becoming its lead anchor.
On the rare occasion when journalists actually _do_ expose the truth yes, great respect, because they know they're going to get shut down & possibly lose their jobs & yes, as a democracy we absolutely _do_ need to hear the truth in matters which will affect our voting. However, that's not what happened during & after that interview is it? What happened was a very experienced interviewer asked a stream of carefully-phrased questions designed to entrap the idiot being interviewed & upon & around that a massive fantasy was built & sold (at 65p or more per daily copy) to the voracious public as fact when it blatantly bore no relationship with the tiny shreds of actual evidence presented.
Remarkable interview. For me it exposed Andrews complete sense of entitlement to the point he believed he could say anything no matter how implausible to explain away his behaviour and the general public would give him the benefit of the doubt.
Much like Boris Johnson, Dominic Cummings et al during the Covid nightmare. Narcissists who truly believe they are way above the laws and rules that govern everyone else in this country.
@@ajs41 officially, that's true. He settled out of court before the trial so we'll never know. Then again though why settle to the tune of millions if you are innocent? Besides, I wasn't talking about that, I was talking about the sense I got of him from this interview as a human being and my conclusion was he's not very impressive, born into enormous privilege he had every possible advantage and still managed to blow it... entitled and clearly not very bright is quite a combination. By all accounts even his old pal Epstein exploited this and privately told people that Andrew was an idiot, but - to him - a useful one.
Sa rah Ferguson had asked Beatrice to persuade daddy to the invitation to appear on the BBC , so that they all could just carry on with their lives as before 😜 It backfired 😜.
Yes. She's far from my favourite TV presenter/interviewer, but she did very well indeed with this interview. A very professional performance by Emily Maitlis.
Final comment from James is unfair. Emily Maitlis didn’t bring down a member of the royal family; Andrew did that himself. She did a fantastic and difficult interview through which Andrew was exposed. We shouldn’t burden her with any feelings of responsibility for the fallout. You can see the seriousness with which she considered the subject throughout this clip which contrasted with James’ boyish and inappropriate excitement.
"it's an amazing thing to have done, brought down a member of the royal family" "I think I just asked the questions" Real journalism described in one answer
@@swchri1264 yeah, definitely. I loved her long pause, compared to how fluid the conversation had been, like recalibrating and trying to get out of the loaded-ness of it lol very skillful
I was very impressed with the interview - for me it was all the evidence needed that Emily (and the whole team) were a huge asset to the BBC. It's a shame they were not more confident supporting her when the UK Gov complained.
Yes. I have some respect for the Queen although I would like to think if I was born in the same position, I would say enough of this nonsense. She did however bring up at least two dysfunctional sons. Andrew, self explanatory, Charles cash in a suitcase from Saudi Arabia and allowing his employees to be made redundant in the week the country stopped ; also honours for a donor to one of his charities. I accept he was probably brought up not able to realise how corrupt that all was but that’s why it should all be done away with.
Emily Maitlis… you’re an absolute legend in my book! She is a cool journalist, always looks in control of the interview and has a brilliant way of disarming most interviewees! Very intelligent lady.
@@hb1338 She's a trained journalist with a degree from (ironically) Queen's College Cambridge. She doesn't need anyone to write her script or do her work for her. Why are you so bitter towards her? Jealousy? Love for Andrew?
And now she's left the BBC, maybe she'll have more opportunities to show off her journalistic prowess. It's just unfortunate that she chose to remain with them so long and assist them in their task of lying to the British people and covering up for the government. I don't understand how any decent, honest journalist can continue to work for the corporation in its current state.
This is exactly right. When you’ve grown up and have noting but yes people around, treating you like your ish don’t stink, this is the consequence. It was appalling watching that interview.
she is journalism in its purist form and all that it stands for. truth no matter the circumstances/consequences to give you the facts to make your own informed decision. she could have easily ruined her career or had it ruined by others for the nature of that interview considering his status and all that would stand by the royals but she crafted it perfectly making it impossible to go any other way. a true masterclass of journalism/interview skills that will be studied and taught for years to come.
@@hb1338 yeah fair and true point. I'm sure she'll have a say in which direction to take it in built around her style of interviewing but a great interview it was.
Although Andrew wasn't allowed to wear his military uniform at the Queen's funeral, it was nice to see him wearing his military medals along with “JIM FIXED IT FOR ME”
For what? Nothing was proven? Innocent until proven guilty? Would you like to be accused and charged with something that hasn't been proven in a court of law.
@@cmorecult yes, but guilty of what? paying a 17 year old girl for .. ahem .. services? at best that is his crime, from the evidence we have. i wouldn't be surprised if there's more dirt under the rug but having known this girl doesn't seem like such a heinous offense
2:03 James O'Brien: "It's an astonishing thing, isn't it, to have brought down a member of the royal family?" Prince Andrew was at the memorial - he wasn't brought down, he's a free man.
I was astonished to see him at any of the recent events, and yet more people seemed to be complaining that Harry & Meghan were there. Apparently the UK loves child abusers more than mixed-race couples. Doesn't it make you proud? 🤢
@@freakishuproar1168 Nothing of the sort. A civil settlement was reached that meant he didn't have to serve prison time. The legal system allows money (fines/damages) in lieu of prison as punishment and it saves the taxpayers money. Even if imprisoned, he would have been allowed out to attend his mother's funeral, I surmise. That was the point I was making to the OP. You may be envious that he is not living in poverty, but I am not. But then, that's me.
Emily's interview was a Masterclass in not only how to conduct an interview, but knowing the right questions to ask and to be insightful enough to think on your feet with direct follow-up questions. Brilliant!!
Emily Maites's interview of Mr. Andrew was masterful. Emily Maitlis was well prepared and non-judgemental. She appeared to be calm and composed throughout the interview and was exceedingly patient in spite of his obvious evasiveness, feigned selective amnesia, framing all from his one-sided, biased perspective, and his repugnant, self-incriminating responses.
It wasn't until Prince Andrew was 15 that he found out that people put stamps on letters because it was about paying for postage rather than because they liked his mother. True story. A prince asked a holy man how he could achieve enlightenment. The holy man asked him if he ever forgot that he was a prince. The prince replied no. The holy man said "Then until you forget, you will never achieve enlightenment".
As always, Emily conducted herself in a professional manner, asked her questions, stuck to the facts and stayed cool in the face of the enormity of what was unfolding before her very eyes. She gave a masterclass of unbiased interviewing and the result spoke for itself.
Great clip. Now I want to listen to the whole podcast. I saw that it had downloaded to my phone earlier today but now it will be top of the list to listen to.
It was the one time in his life where he had to stand on his own and face questions instead of fawning and grovelling lackies obeying his every word, an excellent interview, just handed him the rope and allowed him to do the rest
We already know that. The striking thing about the Jeffrey Epstein child prostitution ring is that although several very powerful men have been implicated, ONLY foreigners have been prosecuted in the US. Rich men almost never go to jail for such offences anywhere.
Maybe because then if he ended up in court,his legal team would argue his trial had been prejudiced by “trial by tv” and he couldn’t get a fair hearing
I think there is another book by one of Trump's team who mentions a few things about this case. The FBI were sandbagged took them weeks before they were given the name of Andrew's lawyers. Lots more stalling and then there was the young boy killed on his motorbike by the wife of a US diplomat. According to the book as the UK police obviously wanted her to comback to answer questions . The fix went in you don't get Andrew and we drop the case against the US woman. Now I now that's from a Trump flunky but still it has a horrible stench that you could believe could happen.
He wanted it. His Personal Secretary resigned after advising him against it and being ignored. Andrew thought he could answer a few prearranged questions, put his side of the story to the public and be exonerated. He isn't wily enough to give the non answers of politicians.
I watched their interview at least half a dozen times & i just heard it now (i watched it again) I cannot believe that he said what he said & neither she or anyone picked up on it! He said when she asked about when he was in J.E townhouse & HE replied “no, i was in Chicago, because the next day SHE (Virginia) and they all went to the island.” So he DOES know her!!! How the interviewer didn’t register this answer is wild! HOW did we all not notice?! She needs to speak up about this because this is BIG!! This is HUGE!!
You can bet your life, if the FBI said they would like to talk to me and i refused, they would be battering down my door at 4 in the morning and dragging me out..!! Prince Andrew refuses and nothing happens, its sickening
Listening to these two talk, you'd swear blind he'd been sent down for 20 years or something. He's still living the life of riley at the taxpayers expense last I heard.
She DID NOT bring anyone down! Prince Andrew surrounds himself with yes people! His ego, arrogance, sense of superiority, underestimating everyone around you, Let him down!
This episode was fascinating in many ways, not least of all the slightly more awkward moments between the two. Very enjoyable to watch people being fairly genuine in these times.
Genuine are you kidding me ? This is a mutual admiration interview " Oh I knew what I had got " Pity they were not so keen on exposing the Rotherham grooming gangs .
The arrogance of the man was his downfall ,he could always get a job in California helping them with there on going drought problems ,as he's an expert in water 💦 retention 😳
how do we watch all of this interview? I can find the full audio on James OB channel but no video unless I'm missing the point somewhere... many thanks 🙂
The BBC gets a kicking daily in the gutter press and online. It's worth remembering that it is a world class broadcaster with high standards and excellent staff.
how do we watch all of this interview? I can find the full audio on James OB channel and LBC but there is no video, unless I'm missing the point somewhere...? Many thanks 🙂
That is the responsibility of the media - to ask the questions. And keep asking them until honesty prevails. All too often, the media stop at the point that they think they have the answers that the public most wants to hear... Thankfully, sometimes things fail to add up enough and the momentum fails to fizzle out, so further questions need to be asked until reality is exposed. Most of the time though, royalty just needs to keep repeating the lies because that's perceived to be the populist view.
Yep, and all the public want to hear is "you are right, he's guilty". Everybody who watched the interview under the assumption of guilt, should do themselves the favour of rewatching under the assumption of innocence. It's an interesting experience. But they won't.
Seems nobody brought him down. He's still there, still living his life of the back of a nation who apparently still love him. The British are great at grovelling in front of the royal family regardless. So it seems, Emily affected nothing.
@@mokhot Dumping his title was the household's concession to all the baying wolves and seems to have worked. Accepted by all. They were still in control and it allowed him to continue his life with the same degree of freedom and authority. Even a relief one might say from all those annoying duties such as cutting ribbons. A blessing in disguise. He now has a wider freedom to do as he chooses.
I absolutely believe that Emily Maitlis was hounded out of the BBC because of that interview with Andrew Windsor. Still I ll bet she say it was worth it. Her David Frost moment!
I think she was hounded out because of her comments about Dominic Cummings and the government, don’t think the Sweaty prince had anything to do with it.
What you had was a way to throw him under a bus ! Yes, he’s arrogant and not angel. However, look at what you’ve really done.. Now it’s been proven the one piece of evidence was doctored. Aren’t you proud of “ what you got?”
She did not bring him down, he did that all on his own.
Brilliant interview
A lesser interviewer would have shirked the important questions or did what media people usually do when sitting in front of a member of the royal family - tugged their forelocks and behaved obsequiously. Maitlis played her part superbly and deserves a huge amount of credit for a job well done.
Excatly. Spot on.
no, a massive pack of journalists & the morons who believe them brought him down.
@@jacksimone1677 , Emily Maitlis should be awarded The Pulitzer Prize or a OBE.
If you give someone enough rope…
Emily did not bring him down. He brought himself down with arrogance She did a brilliant interview
She just said that at the end if you're able to read between the lines.
You copied that😅
“I think I just asked the questions” 😂
Translation: he did it to himself.
Truth. He sunk himself long before she sat down to interview him.
Translation: I don't want to get in trouble and agree to taking down a member of the royal family
Could see her thought process off "how do I word this"
@@Hazed64 she did a fantastic job of giving him enough rope.
He did the rest by talking.
She was careful to make sure she acknowledged her work questions research) i wouldn't be shocked if she was up for an award of the interview.
@@Hazed64 you’re both right, of course.
Hari-Kiri i think the japanese call it...except he didn't know it at the time.
The interview was impeccable. The end where Emily asks the prince, if he has any final words? Perhaps a morsel of humility, empathy and consideration for the victims, he says “No, I don’t think so” smugly. It was horrific.
The last question was the killer question . What excuse could Prince Andrew have afterwards?
'Horrific' indeed, absolutely 😳
I though Andrew said he was glad to be giving a chance to put his side of the story.
Precisely......
@@michaelpower4372 , and that he missed his friend Epstein.
He is so utterly delusional, made my skin crawl to watch that interview. Lots of respect to Emily Maitlis
And did Prince Andrew really think the public and the media were going to believe him? Deluded man who hasn't been told "No" often enough. Spoilt, entitled, pompous and mendacious. Miss Maitlis gave him the rope and he hanged himself.
You don’t pay £12 million when you’re innocent.
you don't accept 12 mil when you wanted justice.
@@Ktc99999-b She went for the money because she couldn't provide the 'evidence' she claimed to have. It will be interesting to see what she does when the money has been spent. Allegedly she has a list of other men, including the likes of Bill Clinton. And what has happened about the allegtions that Virginia herself was involved in procuring girls for Epstein?
@@Ktc99999-b Absolutely
Fox News dude sexually assaulted a woman to the tube of 35 million
What crimes were those Lou Dobbs
Well the family of the first Michael Jackson accusations accepted 20 million dollars. If that happened to one of my kids I wouldn’t have taken that money. Every time you step out of your Ferrari into your nice new big house you’re going to be reminded of how you got all this. It’s bull💩, I would prefer prison justice myself. People that like kids in that way have a wonderful time in prison.
Imagine being a Mail reader and getting red-faced furious, steaming from the ears over Meghan Markle, while Prince Andrew exists. It's a strange world.
I don't like either.
Why is it a choice? Both are toxic
it's an extremely 'strange' world in which Mail readers exist.
Strange and getting stranger
@@markware85 So true.
Total admiration for her, her calm consistent tone and the timing of her precise questions was perfect, the way the revelations kept unfolding was testament to her impeccable interview talent
Precisely.
Don't agree she's just a left winger and I don't like them
The whole interview was VERY professionally constructed & implemented.
Viewers have freedom to accept what they believe.
For me, he was exposed & truly discredited beyond doubt.
Very, very easy to recognise he was lying through the whole interview if you have any experience in interviewing guilty people. He clearly had none, so blindly dug his own grave. Bravo Emily for having the guts to do it.
Thank you I couldn't of said it better!!!
And yet within beleif
yup
Beyond belief? Hilarious
Emily is one of the few journalists/reporters who is not afraid to ask the correct questions, even if it could cost her her career. I have nothing, but admiration for her, it’s a pity other so called journalists couldn’t be more like her!
Not bad for a biased amateur hack
Lol, get back in the knife nox, Miss Sharp. Maitless at the time she filmed this had a career spanning over 30 years. She’s had a heavyweight career in several countries, made many odocumentaries, covered hard news, was an editor of the Spectator, and spent well over a decade on the most heavyweight political show the BBC ever had, eventually becoming its lead anchor.
You ARE joking. Shes a CALLOUS BULLYING COW, WHICH FOR ONCE, WAS JUSTIFIED.
@@stephenbradfield3873 Whereas your comment was bad even for a thick far right trollbot...
Hilarious
I have the utmost respect for journalists who expose the truth. That is what we need to hear.
Even if it's 20-30 years late.
She IS the establishment, do not get it twisted
On the rare occasion when journalists actually _do_ expose the truth yes, great respect, because they know they're going to get shut down & possibly lose their jobs & yes, as a democracy we absolutely _do_ need to hear the truth in matters which will affect our voting.
However, that's not what happened during & after that interview is it?
What happened was a very experienced interviewer asked a stream of carefully-phrased questions designed to entrap the idiot being interviewed & upon & around that a massive fantasy was built & sold (at 65p or more per daily copy) to the voracious public as fact when it blatantly bore no relationship with the tiny shreds of actual evidence presented.
@@swampy1234, no nick she’s the truth. Let’s move on from Borisism,trumpism, whataboutism and conspiracy.
They're just slags, destined from birth, in their eyes.
Remarkable interview. For me it exposed Andrews complete sense of entitlement to the point he believed he could say anything no matter how implausible to explain away his behaviour and the general public would give him the benefit of the doubt.
Much like Boris Johnson, Dominic Cummings et al during the Covid nightmare. Narcissists who truly believe they are way above the laws and rules that govern everyone else in this country.
Exactly like Boris Johnson!
Andrew is innocent until proven guilty.
@@ajs41 officially, that's true. He settled out of court before the trial so we'll never know. Then again though why settle to the tune of millions if you are innocent? Besides, I wasn't talking about that, I was talking about the sense I got of him from this interview as a human being and my conclusion was he's not very impressive, born into enormous privilege he had every possible advantage and still managed to blow it... entitled and clearly not very bright is quite a combination. By all accounts even his old pal Epstein exploited this and privately told people that Andrew was an idiot, but - to him - a useful one.
Exactly what I thought....
I have the utmost respect for Emily. She is professional, respectful and not afraid to as tough questions.
"I just ask the questions" Such class. Love it.
Emily did an amazing job in this interview. Constructed with surgical precision and just brilliant journalism.x
Labour of love and advances her agenda
Sa rah Ferguson had asked Beatrice to persuade daddy to the invitation to appear on the BBC , so that they all could just carry on with their lives as before 😜 It backfired 😜.
Yes. She's far from my favourite TV presenter/interviewer, but she did very well indeed with this interview. A very professional performance by Emily Maitlis.
Final comment from James is unfair. Emily Maitlis didn’t bring down a member of the royal family; Andrew did that himself. She did a fantastic and difficult interview through which Andrew was exposed. We shouldn’t burden her with any feelings of responsibility for the fallout. You can see the seriousness with which she considered the subject throughout this clip which contrasted with James’ boyish and inappropriate excitement.
Her response to that question was perfect though, shrugging off what he said and just saying she asked the questions
yes he wanted the soundbite there, she responded perfectly.
Spotted and skillfully dodged a typical trademark catch question loaded to amplify O'Brien's own prejudices. Curses - foiled again , he thought.
That was gross of him
She was smart enough to dodge the question
"it's an amazing thing to have done, brought down a member of the royal family"
"I think I just asked the questions"
Real journalism described in one answer
the idiot brought himself down, nothing to do with her
Quite a loaded question he asked
@@swchri1264 yeah, definitely. I loved her long pause, compared to how fluid the conversation had been, like recalibrating and trying to get out of the loaded-ness of it lol very skillful
Very well considered answer. Also true.
Oh the Grand ol' Duke of York. He had 12 million quid. He gave it to someone he didn't know for something he never did.
Genius.
Its another example that rich and powerful escape the justice we are held to.
Exactly John
I was very impressed with the interview - for me it was all the evidence needed that Emily (and the whole team) were a huge asset to the BBC. It's a shame they were not more confident supporting her when the UK Gov complained.
It wasn’t the bbc it was itv !!
@@donlogan9840 it was BBC Newsnight
She didn’t bring down a member of the royal family. She inconvenienced him. He’s still there, he’s still around.
Dunno, now Brenda's gone and it's old wingnuts in charge he may be further ostracized
Still on the gravy train.
She is so professional and impressive. We need more of her.
He isnt in the real world is he
You're right, he's in the royal world.
Who isn't?
How is he not?
Just a shooting party nothing more
Certainly not in yours or mine.
Exactly. He brought himself down.
Then mummy shamelessly bailed him out.
Yep.
Your mum would do the same for you.
Succinct explanation.
with tax payers money. and yet ppl still back the monarchy
Yes. I have some respect for the Queen although I would like to think if I was born in the same position, I would say enough of this nonsense. She did however bring up at least two dysfunctional sons. Andrew, self explanatory, Charles cash in a suitcase from Saudi Arabia and allowing his employees to be made redundant in the week the country stopped ; also honours for a donor to one of his charities. I accept he was probably brought up not able to realise how corrupt that all was but that’s why it should all be done away with.
At least the corgi's should be safe with him. I heard when the queen asked about it before she died, he replied "No sweat"
😆
Andrew is some what of a pro when it comes to old dogs
At least he has experience in grooming!
The groomer, gets to groom the corgis then, instead of under age girls
i wouldn't leave any dogs near him to be honest.
Emily Maitlis… you’re an absolute legend in my book! She is a cool journalist, always looks in control of the interview and has a brilliant way of disarming most interviewees! Very intelligent lady.
Her interview script was written for her.
@@hb1338 I guess you wrote that yourself, well done 👏
@@hb1338 She's a trained journalist with a degree from (ironically) Queen's College Cambridge. She doesn't need anyone to write her script or do her work for her.
Why are you so bitter towards her? Jealousy? Love for Andrew?
And now she's left the BBC, maybe she'll have more opportunities to show off her journalistic prowess. It's just unfortunate that she chose to remain with them so long and assist them in their task of lying to the British people and covering up for the government. I don't understand how any decent, honest journalist can continue to work for the corporation in its current state.
@@razorednight , I hope Emily Maitlis doesn’t go to Fox or Sky where the lie everyday (Fox at the moment are been sued)
Prince Andrew just completely lacks self awareness because everyone around him is telling him how magnificent he is
This is exactly right. When you’ve grown up and have noting but yes people around, treating you like your ish don’t stink, this is the consequence. It was appalling watching that interview.
she is journalism in its purist form and all that it stands for.
truth no matter the circumstances/consequences to give you the facts to make your own informed decision.
she could have easily ruined her career or had it ruined by others for the nature of that interview considering his status and all that would stand by the royals but she crafted it perfectly making it impossible to go any other way.
a true masterclass of journalism/interview skills that will be studied and taught for years to come.
The interview was scripted by her producer, that is how the BBC works. As she said, she just asked the questions, she didn't create them.
@@hb1338 yeah fair and true point.
I'm sure she'll have a say in which direction to take it in built around her style of interviewing but a great interview it was.
@@hb1338 she's overrated as an interviewer
Although Andrew wasn't allowed to wear his military uniform at the Queen's funeral, it was nice to see him wearing his military medals along with “JIM FIXED IT FOR ME”
This deserves more upvotes.
@@jonathanwalker8730
Cheers matey 👍
😂🤣😆😊😀
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Absolutely! He brought himself down!
If that was any other person we would be in jail its a disgrace 😤
For what? Nothing was proven? Innocent until proven guilty? Would you like to be accused and charged with something that hasn't been proven in a court of law.
It's simple: money talks.
@@harryhill91 12million pounds to the victim says I'm guilty.
@@cmorecult yes, but guilty of what? paying a 17 year old girl for .. ahem .. services? at best that is his crime, from the evidence we have.
i wouldn't be surprised if there's more dirt under the rug but having known this girl doesn't seem like such a heinous offense
@@jonathanwalker8730 Yep 12 mil handed over to someone he never knew !
Emily was amazing. Brilliant interview. That Andrews team thought they did a great job is staggering
I think Andrew’s team advised him not to do it..?
Emily didn't "bring down a member of the Royal Family". Andrew did that himself; unaided.
emily is simply the best interviewer out there. calm and intelligent.
2:03 James O'Brien: "It's an astonishing thing, isn't it, to have brought down a member of the royal family?"
Prince Andrew was at the memorial - he wasn't brought down, he's a free man.
I was astonished to see him at any of the recent events, and yet more people seemed to be complaining that Harry & Meghan were there.
Apparently the UK loves child abusers more than mixed-race couples. Doesn't it make you proud? 🤢
Which is messed up… and all the focus is on Meghan hate. Why do the media ignore this? Insane.
He was in civilian garb, not high military uniform. A tremendous humiliation.
@@Chrisjude100 You mean he has to satisfy himself with his copious inherited wealth and the fact he isn't in prison?
That poor man! x3
@@freakishuproar1168 Nothing of the sort. A civil settlement was reached that meant he didn't have to serve prison time. The legal system allows money (fines/damages) in lieu of prison as punishment and it saves the taxpayers money.
Even if imprisoned, he would have been allowed out to attend his mother's funeral, I surmise. That was the point I was making to the OP.
You may be envious that he is not living in poverty, but I am not. But then, that's me.
Emily's interview was a Masterclass in not only how to conduct an interview, but knowing the right questions to ask and to be insightful enough to think on your feet with direct follow-up questions. Brilliant!!
Emily Maites's interview of Mr. Andrew was masterful. Emily Maitlis was well prepared and non-judgemental. She appeared to be calm and composed throughout the interview and was exceedingly patient in spite of his obvious evasiveness, feigned selective amnesia, framing all from his one-sided, biased perspective, and his repugnant, self-incriminating responses.
It wasn't until Prince Andrew was 15 that he found out that people put stamps on letters because it was about paying for postage rather than because they liked his mother. True story. A prince asked a holy man how he could achieve enlightenment. The holy man asked him if he ever forgot that he was a prince. The prince replied no. The holy man said "Then until you forget, you will never achieve enlightenment".
As always, Emily conducted herself in a professional manner, asked her questions, stuck to the facts and stayed cool in the face of the enormity of what was unfolding before her very eyes. She gave a masterclass of unbiased interviewing and the result spoke for itself.
Sorry, not 'as always'. Watch her interview with the Hungarian foreign minister.
Great clip. Now I want to listen to the whole podcast. I saw that it had downloaded to my phone earlier today but now it will be top of the list to listen to.
Don’t reward this gross guy. You can also listen to her on many other podcasts
Emily's right she just asked the questions, it was Andrew's acts and answers that brought himself down.
It was the one time in his life where he had to stand on his own and face questions instead of fawning and grovelling lackies obeying his every word, an excellent interview, just handed him the rope and allowed him to do the rest
The sad fact is she didn't bring him down though. All we've learnt from it is that powerful people don't answer to the law.
There is no evidence that Prince Andrew broke the law, just unsubstantiated allegations.
I think you forget he didn't break the law
@@susandurrant6357 you really believed his interview and that he didn't sexually assault an underage girl, virginia giuffre?
We already know that. The striking thing about the Jeffrey Epstein child prostitution ring is that although several very powerful men have been implicated, ONLY foreigners have been prosecuted in the US. Rich men almost never go to jail for such offences anywhere.
@@susandurrant6357 The Court of Public Opinion doesn't seem to care about that. Easy to see now how the witches got burned,
The fact that one woman is in prison and is now never even mentioned, is beyond belief.
Sorry I'm thick, which woman?
*edit: ohhh, _her_
When she says “I only ask the questions” and JOB says “that’s al we ever do”! 😮😮😮😂😂😂😂
my question is, during an investigation where there were allegations against andrew, why was he interviewed by the BBC and not the police?
Maybe because then if he ended up in court,his legal team would argue his trial had been prejudiced by “trial by tv” and he couldn’t get a fair hearing
Or is that Her Majesty’s Constabulary? Haha
I think there is another book by one of Trump's team who mentions a few things about this case. The FBI were sandbagged took them weeks before they were given the name of Andrew's lawyers. Lots more stalling and then there was the young boy killed on his motorbike by the wife of a US diplomat. According to the book as the UK police obviously wanted her to comback to answer questions . The fix went in you don't get Andrew and we drop the case against the US woman.
Now I now that's from a Trump flunky but still it has a horrible stench that you could believe could happen.
He wanted it. His Personal Secretary resigned after advising him against it and being ignored. Andrew thought he could answer a few prearranged questions, put his side of the story to the public and be exonerated. He isn't wily enough to give the non answers of politicians.
@@soviet700 Yep Phil got them in their pocket.
I watched their interview at least half a dozen times & i just heard it now (i watched it again) I cannot believe that he said what he said & neither she or anyone picked up on it!
He said when she asked about when he was in J.E townhouse & HE replied “no, i was in Chicago, because the next day SHE (Virginia) and they all went to the island.” So he DOES know her!!!
How the interviewer didn’t register this answer is wild! HOW did we all not notice?! She needs to speak up about this because this is BIG!! This is HUGE!!
You can bet your life, if the FBI said they would like to talk to me and i refused, they would be battering down my door at 4 in the morning and dragging me out..!! Prince Andrew refuses and nothing happens, its sickening
I don't think they have the right to batter down any UK citizens door.
Quicker we in Britain become a Republic the better.
The monarchy is a relic of a bygone age.
Absolutely exceptional, well done Emily Maitlis.
Listening to these two talk, you'd swear blind he'd been sent down for 20 years or something. He's still living the life of riley at the taxpayers expense last I heard.
He wasn't "brought down"... he's still free.
But does anyone have any respect for him?
She DID NOT bring anyone down! Prince Andrew surrounds himself with yes people! His ego, arrogance, sense of superiority, underestimating everyone around you, Let him down!
Brilliant interview by Emily. Excruciatingly embarrassing by Andrew. What was he thinking?! 😮
That's excellent answer " I think I just ask the question "
You did a great job Emily of proving him for what he is.
She did her job well. He brought down the Royals.
A true journalist. Emily Mattis had only questions and not an agenda.
The very best of proper journalism
Love Emily’s humility ❤ her book is amazing, btw
Her "humility"? Or rampaging ambition? For goodness sake, is she a saint now?
Prince Andrew had the interviewing skills fox caught in a chicken coup. After all that posh schooling - he had zero awareness
Emily was great in the interview... can't believe lady Victoria Hervey bashes Emily as though she forced Andrew to mess up 🤷♀️
Can you please release the entire video of this discussion.
This episode was fascinating in many ways, not least of all the slightly more awkward moments between the two.
Very enjoyable to watch people being fairly genuine in these times.
An interviewer interviewing an interviewer.
Genuine are you kidding me ? This is a mutual admiration interview " Oh I knew what I had got " Pity they were not so keen on exposing the Rotherham grooming gangs .
@@rolandhawken6628 Aye . Smug on steroids .
Emily Maitlis needs to watch her back from now, remember what to Diana, and Jill Dando.
The arrogance of the man was his downfall ,he could always get a job in California helping them with there on going drought problems ,as he's an expert in water 💦 retention 😳
As long as Prince Andrew remains free, our children are at risk. It's outrageous that the tax payers are financing his royal lifestyle
That interview was comedy gold 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Exceptional interviewing techniques. Completely masterful. Very thorough. Just outstanding. ❤🎉
"I think I just asked the questions"
Love that. 👌
aye. Like Epstein "just held the parties".
@@happinesstan Do you had parties like that too? You seem very keen to defend nonces?
Excellent context information
Maitliss “We ask the questions” O’Brian: “that’s all we ever do”. No you express an opinion
Excellent answer to the last question!
Charles; 'Will you be my deputy?'
Andrew; 'No sweat... '
Andrew will be known as the Viceroy.
When you are the FAVOURITE son of a Queen, he really did think he was above the law.
She didn't bring down a member of the Royal Family.
Is he in prison? No. Is he still walking around freely? Yes.
Achieved absolutely sod all.
how do we watch all of this interview? I can find the full audio on James OB channel but no video unless I'm missing the point somewhere... many thanks 🙂
The BBC gets a kicking daily in the gutter press and online. It's worth remembering that it is a world class broadcaster with high standards and excellent staff.
Are you being satirical?
With a Tory at the helm it will always be rotten.
how do we watch all of this interview? I can find the full audio on James OB channel and LBC but there is no video, unless I'm missing the point somewhere...? Many thanks 🙂
And yet he still got away with it all 🤔 those kind of people don't change their ways they just buy themselves out of it all 😪
as you would if you could.
hear hear!
@@morrisanderson3180 it's obviously sad for her family, but they're corrupt as they come 😡
Remarkable journalist!
He did do himself the greatest harm of all, and ultimately we now know why he’s always been referred to as “Randy Andy!”
I think she realised just how out of touch he was. He’s a complete narcissist at best.
And £12 million💷 later the BBC helped him with the Great Escape from justice😃
She's absolutely wonderful, brilliant journalist
That is the responsibility of the media - to ask the questions. And keep asking them until honesty prevails. All too often, the media stop at the point that they think they have the answers that the public most wants to hear...
Thankfully, sometimes things fail to add up enough and the momentum fails to fizzle out, so further questions need to be asked until reality is exposed. Most of the time though, royalty just needs to keep repeating the lies because that's perceived to be the populist view.
Yep, and all the public want to hear is "you are right, he's guilty". Everybody who watched the interview under the assumption of guilt, should do themselves the favour of rewatching under the assumption of innocence. It's an interesting experience.
But they won't.
@@happinesstan You seem very keen to defend nonces. I wonder why...
@@laurencefox5884 Wow. You're edgy.
Too busy commenting on Meghan’s baby bump,
Fantastic work Emily. Bravo!
Love her as a journalist. Don't know how I found James O'Brien but provides a great insight into what's going on with our neighbors.
That interview was the second worst car crash the Royal family had arranged
"i just asked the questions" - class line
Seems nobody brought him down. He's still there, still living his life of the back of a nation who apparently still love him. The British are great at grovelling in front of the royal family regardless. So it seems, Emily affected nothing.
He lost his title that’s what they mean
@@mokhot
Dumping his title was the household's concession to all the baying wolves and seems to have worked. Accepted by all. They were still in control and it allowed him to continue his life with the same degree of freedom and authority. Even a relief one might say from all those annoying duties such as cutting ribbons. A blessing in disguise. He now has a wider freedom to do as he chooses.
I'm not sure James just asks the questions, there's two very different journalists in that room..
He likes to answer them a bit too
When does the trial begin?
I absolutely believe that Emily Maitlis was hounded out of the BBC because of that interview with Andrew Windsor.
Still I ll bet she say it was worth it. Her David Frost moment!
I think she was hounded out because of her comments about Dominic Cummings and the government, don’t think the Sweaty prince had anything to do with it.
@@wanderingbrummie yes that as well! Although where is Cummings now?
I don’t suppose there’s any chance of an interview with his older brother?
With lots of questions about a certain car crash in Paris !
Or his close personal friendship with Sir Jimmy Savile….
This was a magic interview about one histories most disastrous interviews ever for the person being interviewed. 😂
The interview didn’t achieve very much in the final analysis. Prince Andrew is still a free man when he ought to be in prison.
U seem to have forgotten it's ok to be a n0nc3 when u are royal 😂
@@carl7298 Clearly. The Queen probably gave him £12 million to pay off his accuser as well. Nice.
What you had was a way to throw him under a bus ! Yes, he’s arrogant and not angel. However, look at what you’ve really done.. Now it’s been proven the one piece of evidence was doctored. Aren’t you proud of
“ what you got?”
TV journalism and, in particular, an incisive TV journalist at her very best. Hope we never lose that art.
'That's all we ever do'. 😂🤣😂