The markings and paintings on flying deck, captain's bridge, flyco and admirals bridge are done by our team... Feel proud to be a part of INS Vikrant. ❤❤❤
June 03,2013 at 1900 hrs. I liked the documentary, but as an ex sailor who served on the first INS Vikrant, the commentary states that INS Vikrant became a maritime museum,which is incorrect. It broke my heart when INS vikrant was broken up, and aold as scrap in Mumbai. Jai Hind
Yeah It played a prominent role in 1971 Indo Pak war and should have been preserved in a museum but the metal scrap was purchased by motorcycle manufacturing company Bajaj and they created a motorcycle out of the scrap and named vikrant
With $melly $tinky Indians $hitting all over the ship, the whole ship became a high level bio hazard threat to any living being therefore the ship has to be demolished, destroyed and reduced to untouched and inaccessible scrap and kept in a complete isolated state of existence to protect the future of human race.
@@Toptop80thanks man. We've built everything; stealth destroyers, frigates, Corvettes, conventional subs, nuclear ballistic subs. The only thing left is nuclear attack subs
Correction: History of Indian navy is way long starting from the Chola empire and its epitome during Maratha Emperor Shivaji Maharaja with staggering 400 warships of various sizes in the 1630s
From being the richest country on the planet after plundering and looted by British for 150 yrs India came to this position from nothing to this in just 76yrs of independence I'm so proud of my great country
Sanction didn’t effect the ship building capabilities of India but it almost destroyed the aircraft manufacturing industry no wonder Tejas took so long to take off the ground (The main been cut off from its Engines )
@@wallingnaga6563 Sanctions were only for 3 to 4 years though and they had like 8 engines to use. They could have continued flight tests with that but they barely did
Nicely researched video. About the third carrier though, its likely that the plans for a 65,000 ton heavy carrier have been moved to next decade. Current plans seem to be building a sister ship of INS Vikrant. That way it can be built quickly and at lesser cost. Funds are also needed to fund 11 other classes of warships and 5 other submarine classes all being built or designed in India right now. As it is Indian Navy gets the smallest share of the Indian military budget as the lion's share goes to the Army and Air Force (because primary concern is China and Pakistan just across the border from us). So funds for a 65,000 ton Vishal class carrier will only be available in next decade.
Yes! I was going to post this as well. The Indian navy has decided to go for a repeat order of the Vikrant (sister ship) And due to the experience gained, it can be completed in 8 years with minimal budget overruns. Vishal will come after that.
The third aircraft carrier IAC 2 have been confirmed by the indian navy. It will likely be a sister ship of IAC 1 but with a larger body, increase fire power, flat top deck, and a EMALS Catobar system. It may be around 50,000-60,000 tone catagory.
@@roshanjohnson7467 its not confirmed for stobar. US and india are currently working on development of indigenous EMALS CATOBAR, and also the budget set for the second carrier is around 5 billion dollars, and out of that 5 billion, around 1 billion will be used on the EMALS CATOBAR system. Even if they change there plan, then also its garunteed that it will have a flat deck, hence it will have a CATOBAR system. Also it wont be just an upgraded version, even though it will be a sister ship, the displacement will be larger than INS Vikrant (around 55000-60000 ton), with more indigenousness contents, more firepower, more space for fighters and even better systems.
Pride of India.... True, as it clearly narrated, it may not be the biggest or most modern or most lethal, but Truly Indian... There are only 6 countries in the world that have this capability...
Yes proud of what ? under powered with unreliable mig29k that too one squadron...we require at least 3 ready ...limited range... it is best consolation prize,,,,
@@manisherande4568 And which country in the Indian ocean is a threat to India that we need '3 squadron of mig29k'? Moreover, The carrier can carry up to 26 Rafale M fighters and up to 4 Kamov Ka-31, or 2 HAL Dhruv NUH or 4 MH-60R helicopters!
@@manisherande4568 Where do you think Chinese navy will attack from? The East right? There are 2 channels of water, We have 2 aircraft carriers and the Nicobar Island. Maybe check out the geography, will you?
Even though it's not top Even though it had many delays Even though it's not most advanced Even though it has foreign fighter jets Then also we are proud of it cause it's first
not top and not most advanced? Building an Aircraft carrier of this capability itself takes you among the Top 5 or Top 6 nations out 190 countries on the planet. Chill down.
@@prateeksharma6706 lol really? we have been plundered and looted for 200 years. We have achieved this much within 80 years of independence. What was US doing after 80 years of their independence? Shooting Deers in the forest.
funnily enough, India has actually operated every type of aircraft carrier. CATOBAR, STOBAR, and VTOL. I hear the next Indian carrier Vishal is going to be CATOBAR which is good. Cope-slopes are no way to go.
This is a great achievement for India, and the country has enormous potential. Just bare in mind that if India becomes too successful, it may end up on the 🇺🇸 's hit list! We all know how they despise a competitor, in a world they believe they own!! 🤔
It's a really solid starter carrier for the Indian Navy. Pros = * Domestic made (so India now has production capability to make new ships and a pool of skilled engineers) * Cost effective ramp * Two carriers offers far, far more operational capability. Can rotate ships in and out of an area for sustained fighting, divert a ship to handle threats etc. * Decent size, comparable to anything Russia and France currently have. Cons = * 45,000 tons will get tossed around in harsh sea conditions, limiting operation capability. US carriers are twice as heavy and don't feel the waves as much. * Crew training will suffer given both carriers are mismatched by design. * No unlimited range, meaning logistics will be harder * limited sortie and payload capacity without a catapult system
Nice analysis. But the INS Vikrant has been precisely built to meet the specific geostrategic requirements and threat perceptions of India. So, most of the cons you had mentioned are redundant. Unlike US carriers, Indian ones are not meant for Global deployment and may not be required to operate too deep into the Indian ocean region. Plus, the IN has been operating carriers continuously since the 1960s and have successfully used them in wars. Hence they pretty well know what they need and how to use them effectively. Cheers! ✌️
Barak 8 also known as LR-SAM or MR-SAM is an Indo-Israeli jointly developed surface-to-air missile (SAM) system Barak 8 was jointly developed by India's Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) and Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI). The Barak 8 missile defence system is produced by Israel's Directorate of Research and Development (DDR&D), Elta Systems, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and India's Bharat Dynamics limited (BDL)
Only thing which both Indian carrier group lack as compared to American Navy is nuclear powered carrier and size also to some extent. But It has a enough range for Indian ocean, and well defended with Barak 8 and it has a complete carrier strike group with destroyers (with Brahmos), frigates also each have a nuclear capable Arihant class submarine that can deliver a nuclear warhead along with conventional submarines. China should be careful in Indian Ocean specially Strait of Malacca. Chinese govt. can't survive without Trade that's the route. Afterall, India is only country that has an Ocean name before/after it's own name thanks to Indian Subcontinent. So it must control it.
Precisamos de dois desses, equipados com 25 caças Mig 29 navais,e 15 helicópteros de ataque cado um.No caso seria 2 porta aviões,50 caças,30 helicópteros.Um reforço espetacular para nossa armada. Um sonho até 2040.🙏🙏🇧🇷🇧🇷
It may not be the most powerful but we are proud of the fact that it was made in our country and now we have the technology to make aircraft carriers. Similarly, a country can develop well by not being dependent on others but by developing them on its own. Making things and learning. We may not get success in the beginning but if we do it again and again we will definitely get it. We are proud that our country is moving towards self-reliant India day by day.❤️🇮🇳
@@jusstinbarber For that also we have made Tejas and will upgrade it and give it to the Navy. Our country is also working on advanced multirole aircraft 5th generation. We have also made our own Kaveri aircraft engine which is currently not giving as much thrust as we want but it Development is going on. Soon the fighter aircraft made by our country will be on the aircraft carrier made by our country. 🇮🇳❤️😉👍
From what i know, Indian navy is about to order another 45000 tone AC again and the company said they can build it in 6 years this time, and after that they are planing to order the 65000 tons
Mid 2023 should reveal which airframe will be the stop gap naval fighter for the carrier. But they will be replaced by the new naval fighter that is in development within the next decade.
No, not yet bro. Indian military operates USA made Chinook and Apache Helicopters.. Heavy transport aircraft C-17 globe master, Predators drones.. But it doesn't yet operate any US made fighter jets.
Glad u explain vikrant aircraft carrier in non boredom ot 12 minute, i appreciate u for that... Btw u missed one point DRDO has installed a stealth technology or the project Shakti System inside ins vikrant to make it less cross-section on enemy radar...
Anyone who understands microwave tech knows stealth doesn't work for large objects and that too traveling at such low speeds. Also, SONAR will easily detect it. Plus, aircraft carriers never travel alone. It's always part of a fleet of 10-20 smaller attack ships. So even if stealth really works for large sea objects, there's no point to it since the whole fleet cannot escape radar and sonar. Just because the government says something, it doesn't automatically become true. Critical thinkers can see propaganda a mile away.
@@flowzeta5412 I appreciate your points but we got this information from drdo Twitter reports bro... Plus drdo even makes unimaginable stuff to take over CCP agression towards india like they developed SMART (torpedo missile) , xrsam (2x powerful and greater range than s400 and himars) , world's deadliest lch ,etc etc... So that's why i said it
Pretty sad that no mention of the Hms Hermes served in a war as flagship and, saw sea service of nearly 60 years. Also the keel was laid down in 1944 (WWll).
Can someone in the chat please explain why Aircraft Carriers don't combine ski jump with catapult or EMALS? as from my understanding the ski jump allows more lift due to angle, down side being limitations with MTOW on takeoff. But using EMALS you could have a shorter launch on a ski jump? correct. I'm sure I am completely wrong in my assumptions as it would have been done if it was so beneficial. But would love to know why it wouldn't work. Thank you Horizon for such an amazing video, I am constantly impressed with India's development and how quickly they establish home grown manufacturing for highly complex systems.
By the way, interesting idea. I admit that it is simply too difficult to implement and the benefits will be modest. In addition, takeoff weight restrictions will remain, heavier aircraft cannot be launched
EMALS and Steam catapults are always better than ski-jumps as you want to maximise your MTOW for longer sorties & weapon loads, it also allows heavier aircraft to be launched such as AWACS which increase the carriers capability by orders of magnitude. Skijumps are used A: because the country uses them lacks the technology for EMALS (it's still fairly early-ish tech for China and USA) B: the ship class Vikrant originates from was a Russian "Aircraft carrying cruiser" with a heavy Anti Ship missile compliment that took up a a lot of space C: it's a hell of a lot cheaper.
I guess when aircraft reaches the ski jump with that much force of catapult the landing gear may get damaged, I'm not an expert so take it with a pinch of salt
Its really impossible to have a catapult going up a curve and would be difficult for the aircraft to detatch from the rail if it stopped just short of the ramp. It would also place an ENORMOUS amount of stress on the gear to be flung by a catapult and then squashed as it goes up a curved surface. Hope this answers your question.
Its has to be understood that india is a democracy and it has a large water region to cover with the growing threat from Chinese Navy. Hence india needs to be having atleast 3 carriers in the ocean to counter any threats that harms freedom of navigation and rules based international order in the indian ocean. Also the fact that these are not shared by countries like US , France ,UK or even Russians to india. This caused much delay for india to develop their own indigenous carrier and battle group but now as they have delivered one class carrier they need to keep making more and bigger and nastier ships. Go India 🇮🇳 ❤
Thanks ruski friend, thanks. You didn't used that traditional Indian song which I don't know but why it has been imposed on us by these some western youtube military analyst jokers, even Millennium 7 channel used that, totally killed the mood. Yours seems like, yes, you devoted time and passion.
Any idea if india will be making our own ciws soon? I guess we are still using the Russian ones , not that anything is wrong with them . But would be great if india has its own on the way.
6:30 not Israeli missiles, Barak 8 were developed from ground up, according to the necessary needs for both Israeli and Indian navies. It is a joint venture between IAI and DRDO.
I thought apart from the hull its mostly foreign systems? with Russian and Italian input and the engine is American? But no matter what, only a handful of countries can build and operate these ships.
China doesn't need to be in check. They haven't been the ones waging wars in people's backyards. And the Indian and Chinese navy operates in completely different regions. If they did operate in the same region, India is outclassed and outmatched in literally every aspect. India literally took forever just to launch an obsolete carrier in 2020; how can they hope to take on the Chinese?
@@babiswaster7047 The Chinese Fujian has over twice the displacement capacity, is 80 metres longer, and has a CATOBAR system. In what universe is it obsolete? Meanwhile, the Vikrant is barely larger than a helicopter carrier, which makes forces any naval aircraft that takes off from it from carrying any kind of meaningful payload. This is why it's obsolete. This is a factual and objective analysis, unlike yours.
@@endeliggnist5066 everything chinese built are cheap and low quality product!! the whole world knows that, and even after copying and stealing western and russian technology, they managed and paper 80k carrier, which is even worse than a 40000 ton carrier!! So the only one whoz crying is u chinese bot who came to and indian carrier video to troll LMAO!!😅🤣😂😆
@@babiswaster7047 what exactly makes type 003 "obsolete" and what is "not-obsolete"? Indian navy will not have anything like type 003 for several years in the future. And by that time, chinese navy will have a true Ford-class equivalent: 100,000 ton, CATOBAR design with EM catapult, domestically designed and built 5th gen aircrafts, nuclear reactors, possibly directed energy weapons,...... And possibly several of them. Its not even a comparison.
@@endeliggnist5066 hahaha hahaha Djibouti is African port not chinese port, I think you never learn geography amd you thought China owns African continent l, and india to have their nevy presence at Djibouti 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 idiots everwhere
IAC 2 will likely be the same as INS VIKRANT but will be modified for UAV operations & modernised and efficient than INS VIKRANT . After that only we can see a flat top carrier for Indian Navy . And we can see a faster delivery of IAC 2 than the vikrant . Rafale M has been chosen for the flight wing until TEDBF rolls out.
Thankyou... it may not be the best but its ours❣ so its the best for us indians... we are making another one... which will be bigger nd better... this was basically made to gain experience.. nd now that we have the proper techniques nd experience to make an aircraft carrier.. we are going to make the next one much bigger and better🙏😁
Honestly, comparing it to the Queen Elizabeth II, it's not far off! Give it 30 years, India will be equal to Britain in terms of naval capacity. It's a great ship, any country would be proud to have it!
You dont build a near $3 Billion ship to just "gain experience". It is a very capable weapons platform and will be potent for the next few decades in controlling IOR in conjuction with its CBG and according to Indian Navy's doctrine. You are right in it is not the best but is overkill for PN and more than a very good deterrent for any misadventures by PLAN. Also the soft power an aircraft carrier has is immense
Great video, but you got the location of Cochin on the map wrong, it's a out halfway down the coastline of the state of Kerala, not near the Karnataka border as shown in the video
@@marcd5196 China doesn't even operate in the region, save for a few ships sailing to and fro Djibouti. India is just trying to sow discord in the region again. No wonder its neighbours hate India.
@@Andrew-df1dr Great, then ASEAN would be forced to side with China because you're affecting their trade. Then India can be sanctioned into irrelevance.
Size is only one factor. The Chinese Navy has now surpassed the size of the US Navy but does it have the effectiveness to prevail in battle? India is a free democracy and in my opinion, would do better both economically and militarily to align itself closer to the west.
What the hell does a "free democracy" have to do with anything? Western democracy is a bureaucratic mess. Everything gets done faster, cheaper and better in China, which is why China is growing so fast. If India wishes to align itself to the west, then it has already failed.
Well it's a first step towards indigenization, i mean it's the first step, the next is a 65,000 ton carrier, we already have our own indigenous nuclear submarines, I'm sure we'll be able to make nuclear powered 80,000+ ton carriers within next 60 years if possible
Depends on the strategic requirements and goals of the Navy. Nuclear powered ships tend to be very expensive to build and maintain. And they are really meant for long range operations away from home ports. So if that isn't something that is needed then it is unlikely to be considered. The next gen 65,000 tonne carrier is likely to be more than enough. Three carriers total is the current want but I could see the new carrier being built in more than numbers. With the two 45,000 tonne and maybe 2-3 65,000 tonne being a strong enough fleet to stop anyone from trying to pick a fight.
I think that is an excessive amount of ships. At most, there would be 4 carriers, but with the already limited budget of the Indian Navy, it would take time to implement. A single large carrier which is complemented by two more normal-sized ones like the Vikrant is the most sound strategy in my opinion.
@@adventwolfbane the no of carriers doesn't matter, the carrier groups is what matters and a 45k tone or a 60-65k ton is not enough as compared to a 80k+ ton carrier which can launch more ships simultaneously and can also defend itself and also be used for offensive strikes at the same time
![แฉกลโกงงานวัด 2024 [ โกงมั้ยครับ ep.106 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/taC5dpP3HXA/mqdefault.jpg)
Love india and Indian military ❤ from Sweden
Love from India namaste all ❤️ 🇮🇳 ♥️
Plz help us. I don’t understand why Europeans are supporting Muslims. Plz help us
We are also love Sweden
Let's kick turkey's ass together
Love & respect for swedish people from 🇮🇳
The markings and paintings on flying deck, captain's bridge, flyco and admirals bridge are done by our team... Feel proud to be a part of INS Vikrant. ❤❤❤
hey rishwin congrats brother, a indian military geek here bro. would love to hear more about it. are u on twitter ??
@@iamward0gI am with your mommy, playing in bed. She likes my banana a lot ❤
June 03,2013 at 1900 hrs.
I liked the
documentary, but as an ex sailor
who served on the first INS Vikrant, the commentary states that INS Vikrant became a maritime museum,which is incorrect.
It broke my heart when INS vikrant was broken up, and aold as
scrap in Mumbai.
Jai Hind
Yeah It played a prominent role in 1971 Indo Pak war and should have been preserved in a museum but the metal scrap was purchased by motorcycle manufacturing company Bajaj and they created a motorcycle out of the scrap and named vikrant
Thankyou so much sir for your service
With $melly $tinky Indians $hitting all over the ship, the whole ship became a high level bio hazard threat to any living being therefore the ship has to be demolished, destroyed and reduced to untouched and inaccessible scrap and kept in a complete isolated state of existence to protect the future of human race.
First Vikrant was a "museum" docked near Gateway of India till it got scrapped.
We can find the remains of OLD vikrant in "Bajaj Vikrant" bike😊
Nice looking Carrier...OUTSTANDING India!
Yeah, it's really making us proud. Wait for our aircrafts like TEDBF,AMCA and trjas mk2.... they are gonna be really damn beautiful and amazing
@@ADARSH-qc7iq
You guys should be proud, its a big achievement to have a aircraft carrier.
Congratulations.
@@Toptop80thanks man. We've built everything; stealth destroyers, frigates, Corvettes, conventional subs, nuclear ballistic subs. The only thing left is nuclear attack subs
@@Toptop80 The third one is gonna launch next year, where are you from ?
@@suryanshsagar2677 Bruh what ? We've 2 nuclear attack submarines, INS Arihant and INS Arighat
I love India! 🇮🇳 🇮🇳 🇮🇳 🧡🤍💚
/Sweden
❤❤
❤❤
Sweden the land of Vikings love it.
Correction: History of Indian navy is way long starting from the Chola empire and its epitome during Maratha Emperor Shivaji Maharaja with staggering 400 warships of various sizes in the 1630s
Ayinu
@@deepakpradeep3801 He is stating facts
But no aircraft carriers then!
@@nightlightabcd well done! 😂
Chola had naval ships , maratha had warships that's why they're considered first navy
First western channel I seen my life
Without propoganda
Without misleading facts
True research is done by horizon
Well done
There's actually quite a few like that, that aren't well known
You've not been around much have you XD
@@F22raptor46 mostly are Wikipedia copy paste channel without any research they just make video
@@Ironhide234 Wikipedia can literally be edited by anyone, so that's not exactly reliable
Remember when the Indian sub sank became someone left the porthole open
From being the richest country on the planet after plundering and looted by British for 150 yrs India came to this position from nothing to this in just 76yrs of independence I'm so proud of my great country
Well done India, from Australia. 😁😁
You forget main one point.
India have faced senctions from 1999 - 2007, after all those things, India bounced back & completed everything by itself.
I think you mean Sanctions not sections, also none of those affected ship building in anyway
Sanction didn’t effect the ship building capabilities of India but it almost destroyed the aircraft manufacturing industry no wonder Tejas took so long to take off the ground (The main been cut off from its Engines )
@@wallingnaga6563 Sanctions were only for 3 to 4 years though and they had like 8 engines to use. They could have continued flight tests with that but they barely did
"everything"
another indian lying to hype up his country lol
Great effort and well worth it. It’s a lesson to be learned for India. From Australia.
Nicely researched video. About the third carrier though, its likely that the plans for a 65,000 ton heavy carrier have been moved to next decade. Current plans seem to be building a sister ship of INS Vikrant. That way it can be built quickly and at lesser cost. Funds are also needed to fund 11 other classes of warships and 5 other submarine classes all being built or designed in India right now.
As it is Indian Navy gets the smallest share of the Indian military budget as the lion's share goes to the Army and Air Force (because primary concern is China and Pakistan just across the border from us). So funds for a 65,000 ton Vishal class carrier will only be available in next decade.
Yes! I was going to post this as well. The Indian navy has decided to go for a repeat order of the Vikrant (sister ship)
And due to the experience gained, it can be completed in 8 years with minimal budget overruns. Vishal will come after that.
Navy seems more focused on submarines this time
Yeah. just make a sister ship… a follow-up class should be in development in 2 decades.
@@OperationEndGame Less than a decade tbh
India is building carrier for face saving purposes than to build its economy and to save people from poverty.
The third aircraft carrier IAC 2 have been confirmed by the indian navy. It will likely be a sister ship of IAC 1 but with a larger body, increase fire power, flat top deck, and a EMALS Catobar system. It may be around 50,000-60,000 tone catagory.
Definitely wont have a EMALS CATOBAR. Its confirmed to be a STOBAR with the same tech as vikrant with only minor modifications
@@roshanjohnson7467 its not confirmed for stobar. US and india are currently working on development of indigenous EMALS CATOBAR, and also the budget set for the second carrier is around 5 billion dollars, and out of that 5 billion, around 1 billion will be used on the EMALS CATOBAR system. Even if they change there plan, then also its garunteed that it will have a flat deck, hence it will have a CATOBAR system. Also it wont be just an upgraded version, even though it will be a sister ship, the displacement will be larger than INS Vikrant (around 55000-60000 ton), with more indigenousness contents, more firepower, more space for fighters and even better systems.
@@roshanjohnson7467 lol def gonna have EMALS CATOBAR trump already gave the tech lol
@@rickgolder6818 Wanna bet? Let's come back here in 5 years. I'll set an alarm. Let's see if we progress on EMALS
@@roshanjohnson7467 deal mate 🤝
Appreciate the hard work, effort and time put in to make a detailed video on the INS Vikant.
Pride of India.... True, as it clearly narrated, it may not be the biggest or most modern or most lethal, but Truly Indian... There are only 6 countries in the world that have this capability...
Lets hope that if China ever goes to war again with india, the aircraft carriers are better than what the chinese have
Yes proud of what ? under powered with unreliable mig29k that too one squadron...we require at least 3 ready ...limited range... it is best consolation prize,,,,
@@manisherande4568 And which country in the Indian ocean is a threat to India that we need '3 squadron of mig29k'? Moreover, The carrier can carry up to 26 Rafale M fighters and up to 4 Kamov Ka-31, or 2 HAL Dhruv NUH or 4 MH-60R helicopters!
@Dazai_a yeah so against Chinese Navy you will be deploying one squadron 9n under powered migs...why do need a aircraft carrier...
@@manisherande4568 Where do you think Chinese navy will attack from? The East right? There are 2 channels of water, We have 2 aircraft carriers and the Nicobar Island. Maybe check out the geography, will you?
Even though it's not top
Even though it had many delays
Even though it's not most advanced
Even though it has foreign fighter jets
Then also we are proud of it cause it's first
not top and not most advanced? Building an Aircraft carrier of this capability itself takes you among the Top 5 or Top 6 nations out 190 countries on the planet.
Chill down.
Really? I mean it’s India, Marc. What the hell do they need a carrier for?
@@marcd5196 dude we are the largest nation on the planet 5-6 is not proud for us but Shamefull😕
@@postergmail6202 we need 3 aircraft carriers cause we sit in middle of an ocean from where 70% of all world trade passes one way or the other
@@prateeksharma6706 lol really? we have been plundered and looted for 200 years. We have achieved this much within 80 years of independence.
What was US doing after 80 years of their independence? Shooting Deers in the forest.
funnily enough, India has actually operated every type of aircraft carrier. CATOBAR, STOBAR, and VTOL.
I hear the next Indian carrier Vishal is going to be CATOBAR which is good. Cope-slopes are no way to go.
Yeah we even went war with our Carrier in 1971 can created a new country Bangladesh
@@ChandranPrema123 That was a CATOBAR ( Catapult assisted take-off But Arrested Recovery) aircraft carrier purchased from the British.
This is a great achievement for India, and the country has enormous potential. Just bare in mind that if India becomes too successful, it may end up on the 🇺🇸 's hit list! We all know how they despise a competitor, in a world they believe they own!! 🤔
Currently we aren't trying to flex muscles but in future we will and we know we will be on the hit list
OUR SOLDIERS OUR REAL HEROES 🇮🇳
Awesome video on INS Vikrant !
It's a really solid starter carrier for the Indian Navy.
Pros =
* Domestic made (so India now has production capability to make new ships and a pool of skilled engineers)
* Cost effective ramp
* Two carriers offers far, far more operational capability. Can rotate ships in and out of an area for sustained fighting, divert a ship to handle threats etc.
* Decent size, comparable to anything Russia and France currently have.
Cons =
* 45,000 tons will get tossed around in harsh sea conditions, limiting operation capability. US carriers are twice as heavy and don't feel the waves as much.
* Crew training will suffer given both carriers are mismatched by design.
* No unlimited range, meaning logistics will be harder
* limited sortie and payload capacity without a catapult system
Nice analysis. But the INS Vikrant has been precisely built to meet the specific geostrategic requirements and threat perceptions of India. So, most of the cons you had mentioned are redundant. Unlike US carriers, Indian ones are not meant for Global deployment and may not be required to operate too deep into the Indian ocean region. Plus, the IN has been operating carriers continuously since the 1960s and have successfully used them in wars. Hence they pretty well know what they need and how to use them effectively. Cheers! ✌️
Indian Armed Forces 🧡🤍💚
Jai Hind.. Jai Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳
Vande-Mataram 🇮🇳🇮🇳
Barak 8 also known as LR-SAM or MR-SAM is an Indo-Israeli jointly developed surface-to-air missile (SAM) system
Barak 8 was jointly developed by India's Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) and Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI). The Barak 8 missile defence system is produced by Israel's Directorate of Research and Development (DDR&D), Elta Systems, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and India's Bharat Dynamics limited (BDL)
Yes inspired from a israeli SAM
And it's Head basically Sensor head is made my Krass
A kalyani and Rafael JV.
Спасибо большое за издательство. 🙏
The history of Indian Navy doesn't start in 1950s it started with the Maratha Empire which had one of the most lethal naval regims of its time.
Navy with engines
modern indian navy means navy of republic of India.
First aircraft was the pushpaka vimana
Chola empire ;), even before Marathas. Don't forget the South bro
@@keripalajanataand Kalinga did it WAYYY before Cholas, so you too should not be so egoistic...
India is building is a sister ship of ins Vikrant and ins vishal will be 4 th aircraft carrier
INS Vishal is delayed
@@veer8885 in it place vikrantsister ship will be build when it is ready near 2030 ins vishal plan will be finalised thus construction will start
@@vibhanshuchauhan3328 Construction has already started
An enourmous achievment by India. Hope it provided the knowhow needed to build a few more (looking like they'll be needed).
correction: Barak 8 is jointly developed by India and Israel and not license produced by India.
Yes it is. Please read about them. They still own the rights over Barak. It wasn’t 50-50 partnership
Only thing which both Indian carrier group lack as compared to American Navy is nuclear powered carrier and size also to some extent. But It has a enough range for Indian ocean, and well defended with Barak 8 and it has a complete carrier strike group with destroyers (with Brahmos), frigates also each have a nuclear capable Arihant class submarine that can deliver a nuclear warhead along with conventional submarines. China should be careful in Indian Ocean specially Strait of Malacca. Chinese govt. can't survive without Trade that's the route.
Afterall, India is only country that has an Ocean name before/after it's own name thanks to Indian Subcontinent. So it must control it.
I hope India starts building more sophisticated submarines
Pride of Indian Navy & Atmanirbhar India
Sorry. We all feel for you.
@@postergmail6202 for what??
@@rajatdani619 for his mother 😂
More vids about Indian Navy ships and also the Chinese Navy Carrier Programme would be interesting, and also the Japanese subs please
pretty good for first indegenious carrier ,this experience will help us to develop more advance Carrier
It was obsolete the moment it was launched.
@@endeliggnist5066 and you would know because.....?
@@endeliggnist5066 just like the gerald r ford and queen elizabeth are obsolete the moment they were launched!!
Precisamos de dois desses, equipados com 25 caças Mig 29 navais,e 15 helicópteros de ataque cado um.No caso seria 2 porta aviões,50 caças,30 helicópteros.Um reforço espetacular para nossa armada. Um sonho até 2040.🙏🙏🇧🇷🇧🇷
It may not be the most powerful but we are proud of the fact that it was made in our country and now we have the technology to make aircraft carriers. Similarly, a country can develop well by not being dependent on others but by developing them on its own. Making things and learning. We may not get success in the beginning but if we do it again and again we will definitely get it. We are proud that our country is moving towards self-reliant India day by day.❤️🇮🇳
yes, an aircraft career is just there to carry aircrafts. What matters the most are the planes that we put on it!!
@@jusstinbarber For that also we have made Tejas and will upgrade it and give it to the Navy. Our country is also working on advanced multirole aircraft 5th generation. We have also made our own Kaveri aircraft engine which is currently not giving as much thrust as we want but it Development is going on. Soon the fighter aircraft made by our country will be on the aircraft carrier made by our country.
🇮🇳❤️😉👍
From what i know, Indian navy is about to order another 45000 tone AC again and the company said they can build it in 6 years this time, and after that they are planing to order the 65000 tons
With the kind of enemies we have in our vicinity, India needs many more Aircraft carriers like Vikrant urgently.
We’ve been trying to reach you about your aircraft carriers extended warranty.
😂😂good one but be aware we can even reach for extended warranty of space ship next time. Because ISRO and NASA are collaborating for a rocket NISAR
Congratulations Indian Navy.
Love your deep explanation of Indian Navy 👋👍👋
Thank you Horizon 🙏
Thank you for the new post. As a subscriber, I look forward to new posts on all of your channels. Are there truly F18s in the Indian military?
They're not, but the model was one of the contenders for INS Vikrant's naval aircraft.
The contract is going to the Rafale - M most probably. And the follow on carriers will receive indigenous fighters.
No and india will never aqure it as us don't allow indian missiles or avionics there
Mid 2023 should reveal which airframe will be the stop gap naval fighter for the carrier. But they will be replaced by the new naval fighter that is in development within the next decade.
No, not yet bro. Indian military operates USA made Chinook and Apache Helicopters.. Heavy transport aircraft C-17 globe master, Predators drones.. But it doesn't yet operate any US made fighter jets.
Glad u explain vikrant aircraft carrier in non boredom ot 12 minute, i appreciate u for that...
Btw u missed one point DRDO has installed a stealth technology or the project Shakti System inside ins vikrant to make it less cross-section on enemy radar...
Anyone who understands microwave tech knows stealth doesn't work for large objects and that too traveling at such low speeds. Also, SONAR will easily detect it. Plus, aircraft carriers never travel alone. It's always part of a fleet of 10-20 smaller attack ships. So even if stealth really works for large sea objects, there's no point to it since the whole fleet cannot escape radar and sonar. Just because the government says something, it doesn't automatically become true. Critical thinkers can see propaganda a mile away.
@@flowzeta5412
I appreciate your points but we got this information from drdo Twitter reports bro... Plus drdo even makes unimaginable stuff to take over CCP agression towards india like they developed SMART (torpedo missile) , xrsam (2x powerful and greater range than s400 and himars) , world's deadliest lch ,etc etc...
So that's why i said it
@@flowzeta5412 dumbass.
India's Strategy for buying weapons: everything that works is fair game no matter who makes it
Pretty sad that no mention of the Hms Hermes served in a war as flagship and, saw sea service of nearly 60 years. Also the keel was laid down in 1944 (WWll).
She is not even ther first Indian Vikrant, but she is without a doubt the first Indian Indian Vikrant
Can someone in the chat please explain why Aircraft Carriers don't combine ski jump with catapult or EMALS? as from my understanding the ski jump allows more lift due to angle, down side being limitations with MTOW on takeoff. But using EMALS you could have a shorter launch on a ski jump? correct. I'm sure I am completely wrong in my assumptions as it would have been done if it was so beneficial. But would love to know why it wouldn't work.
Thank you Horizon for such an amazing video, I am constantly impressed with India's development and how quickly they establish home grown manufacturing for highly complex systems.
By the way, interesting idea. I admit that it is simply too difficult to implement and the benefits will be modest. In addition, takeoff weight restrictions will remain, heavier aircraft cannot be launched
EMALS and Steam catapults are always better than ski-jumps as you want to maximise your MTOW for longer sorties & weapon loads, it also allows heavier aircraft to be launched such as AWACS which increase the carriers capability by orders of magnitude. Skijumps are used A: because the country uses them lacks the technology for EMALS (it's still fairly early-ish tech for China and USA) B: the ship class Vikrant originates from was a Russian "Aircraft carrying cruiser" with a heavy Anti Ship missile compliment that took up a a lot of space C: it's a hell of a lot cheaper.
I guess when aircraft reaches the ski jump with that much force of catapult the landing gear may get damaged, I'm not an expert so take it with a pinch of salt
Its really impossible to have a catapult going up a curve and would be difficult for the aircraft to detatch from the rail if it stopped just short of the ramp. It would also place an ENORMOUS amount of stress on the gear to be flung by a catapult and then squashed as it goes up a curved surface. Hope this answers your question.
Ski jump is cheaper... catapult system is expensive to build and maintain and does require a lot of power....
Cool video, hope the algorithm won't forsake it.
India doesn't lack in anything. All she needs is a little expertise in building weapons and soon we'll leave every other country in dust.
Hahahahahahahahaha.
@@postergmail6202 someone's bum is burning!!
> india doesn't lack anything
> All she needs is.....
Ok bud
Do you have the slightest idea how not-little "little" expertise is?
The name Vikrant has a nice sound rolling of the tongue.
To the Chinese, the scariest Carrier of the Indian is called "Nicobar". 🙂
India really needs to build up it's navy, if it's going to be strong enough to stand up to China, one on one.
Love from Andromeda galaxy.
I think its wonderful........(said like a soccer mom).
Its has to be understood that india is a democracy and it has a large water region to cover with the growing threat from Chinese Navy.
Hence india needs to be having atleast 3 carriers in the ocean to counter any threats that harms freedom of navigation and rules based international order in the indian ocean.
Also the fact that these are not shared by countries like US , France ,UK or even Russians to india.
This caused much delay for india to develop their own indigenous carrier and battle group but now as they have delivered one class carrier they need to keep making more and bigger and nastier ships.
Go India 🇮🇳 ❤
Thanks ruski friend, thanks.
You didn't used that traditional Indian song which I don't know but why it has been imposed on us by these some western youtube military analyst jokers, even Millennium 7 channel used that, totally killed the mood.
Yours seems like, yes, you devoted time and passion.
Any idea if india will be making our own ciws soon? I guess we are still using the Russian ones , not that anything is wrong with them . But would be great if india has its own on the way.
next one will be an sister ship by the way nice one
Well researched video !
Very informative video than other video creators ❤
Bharat should invest in a artificial islands in Indian Ocean region which act as unsinkable Aircraft carrier's.
The andaman already exists
@@SRMS26 Apart from Adamant and lakdeep we need small islands in IOR
@@rajeshbobba3851 You Know About Agalega Island In Mauritius??
If not Google it
@@shashanksingh9127 It is only for radar installation not for Fighter jets and military services.
@@rajeshbobba3851 Who knows, What if it gets transformed into a naval base in future 🤷
India 🇮🇳 UAE 🇦🇪
India please dont talk to much..,Just build it& commissioned it
Dont wait for the time that Indian Ocean will
Sister ship of ins vikrant is on the boards, 65k tonner is pushed for 2030s
Another obsolete ship in 2030? What a waste of money. China could have built that in 2 years.
@@endeliggnist5066 so, whats your point then, chinas budget is 10 times more
@@sammy57533 My point is that the Indian aircraft carrier is obsolete. Can you read?
@@endeliggnist5066 china's ones are more obsolete and are cheap copy paste!!
@@babiswaster7047 Cry lmao.
Appreciate the content
One video on Type 214 submerine.
6:30 not Israeli missiles, Barak 8 were developed from ground up, according to the necessary needs for both Israeli and Indian navies. It is a joint venture between IAI and DRDO.
Love from india all brothers and sisters😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
11:08 is insulting , STX OSV Holdings Limited, one of the major global designers and shipbuilders of offshore and specialized vessels
I thought apart from the hull its mostly foreign systems? with Russian and Italian input and the engine is American? But no matter what, only a handful of countries can build and operate these ships.
Over 78% of the equipment used in the ship are of indigenous origin.
Engines are American, Radar and Sonar systems are Israeli,
just shows how china isnt the only one with a powerful navy in the region hopefully itll help keep china in check
China doesn't need to be in check. They haven't been the ones waging wars in people's backyards. And the Indian and Chinese navy operates in completely different regions. If they did operate in the same region, India is outclassed and outmatched in literally every aspect. India literally took forever just to launch an obsolete carrier in 2020; how can they hope to take on the Chinese?
@@endeliggnist5066 type 003 is the one that will be obsolete when it launches!!
@@babiswaster7047 The Chinese Fujian has over twice the displacement capacity, is 80 metres longer, and has a CATOBAR system. In what universe is it obsolete?
Meanwhile, the Vikrant is barely larger than a helicopter carrier, which makes forces any naval aircraft that takes off from it from carrying any kind of meaningful payload. This is why it's obsolete. This is a factual and objective analysis, unlike yours.
@@endeliggnist5066 everything chinese built are cheap and low quality product!! the whole world knows that, and even after copying and stealing western and russian technology, they managed and paper 80k carrier, which is even worse than a 40000 ton carrier!!
So the only one whoz crying is u chinese bot who came to and indian carrier video to troll LMAO!!😅🤣😂😆
@@babiswaster7047 what exactly makes type 003 "obsolete" and what is "not-obsolete"?
Indian navy will not have anything like type 003 for several years in the future. And by that time, chinese navy will have a true Ford-class equivalent: 100,000 ton, CATOBAR design with EM catapult, domestically designed and built 5th gen aircrafts, nuclear reactors, possibly directed energy weapons,...... And possibly several of them. Its not even a comparison.
It most likely rafle m ,navy said its okay with f 18 or rafle m,airforce already operating rafles so it's will the most likely option
Oto 76 gun is installed or not I didn't see any where in the ship images or videos
Thank you 🙏 🇮🇳
👍🏼Jai Jawan🙏🏼❤️Jai Hind🇮🇳
wow.. the locally made carrier without planes.. good
@lingth it's have planes but you can't see
@@demonjay5790 it's like the Emperor's new clothes, only the wise can see.. 🙈
@@lingth like Chinese who makes quantities of ships but don't ports to dock😂
@@demonjay5790 Where'd you get that from? They have ports lining up their entire eastern coastline, and a military base in Djibouti.
@@endeliggnist5066 hahaha hahaha Djibouti is African port not chinese port, I think you never learn geography amd you thought China owns African continent l, and india to have their nevy presence at Djibouti 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 idiots everwhere
Awesome
What a detailed video
IAC 2 will likely be the same as INS VIKRANT but will be modified for UAV operations & modernised and efficient than INS VIKRANT . After that only we can see a flat top carrier for Indian Navy . And we can see a faster delivery of IAC 2 than the vikrant . Rafale M has been chosen for the flight wing until TEDBF rolls out.
Great Video DRDO ISRO and more
Very nice video
For info = 3rd Aircraft carrier based on same INS Vikrant has been approved and work has already start as stop gap to Mega Flat deck Supercarrier
Please make a video about uss long beach
Considering its new, It looks really old. Soviet like.
Made in our own KOCHI,KERALA, INDIA
Yes manufactured by cochin shipyard 💜
ആ കാര്യത്തിൽ "ജയലളിത"💪💪💪💪💪❤❤.അറബി എന്നു എല്ലാവനും പേടിച് തൂറിയപ്പോ അവർ നൈസായിട്ട് കൈകാര്യം ചെയ്തു.
Thankyou... it may not be the best but its ours❣ so its the best for us indians... we are making another one... which will be bigger nd better... this was basically made to gain experience.. nd now that we have the proper techniques nd experience to make an aircraft carrier.. we are going to make the next one much bigger and better🙏😁
Honestly, comparing it to the Queen Elizabeth II, it's not far off! Give it 30 years, India will be equal to Britain in terms of naval capacity. It's a great ship, any country would be proud to have it!
You dont build a near $3 Billion ship to just "gain experience". It is a very capable weapons platform and will be potent for the next few decades in controlling IOR in conjuction with its CBG and according to Indian Navy's doctrine. You are right in it is not the best but is overkill for PN and more than a very good deterrent for any misadventures by PLAN. Also the soft power an aircraft carrier has is immense
Great video, but you got the location of Cochin on the map wrong, it's a out halfway down the coastline of the state of Kerala, not near the Karnataka border as shown in the video
What will happen if India sends the Aircraft carrier through the Taiwan Strait?
India wont. Its more to defend against any incoming Chinese aggression in the Indian Ocean Region.
It will get blown up even before it reaches the Taiwan Strait.
@@marcd5196 China doesn't even operate in the region, save for a few ships sailing to and fro Djibouti. India is just trying to sow discord in the region again. No wonder its neighbours hate India.
@@endeliggnist5066 Then any Chinese shipping near the northern end of the Straits of Malacca will be sunk.
@@Andrew-df1dr Great, then ASEAN would be forced to side with China because you're affecting their trade. Then India can be sanctioned into irrelevance.
I think CSL becoming like the Newport News facility of India
How many years did they took to built this?
Awesome video
Size is only one factor. The Chinese Navy has now surpassed the size of the US Navy but does it have the effectiveness to prevail in battle? India is a free democracy and in my opinion, would do better both economically and militarily to align itself closer to the west.
What the hell does a "free democracy" have to do with anything? Western democracy is a bureaucratic mess. Everything gets done faster, cheaper and better in China, which is why China is growing so fast. If India wishes to align itself to the west, then it has already failed.
Think about why the United States is now trying its best to suppress China instead of India, because China is the real threat to the United States.
Russia would be wise to purchase 2 or 3
for its own navy allowing the retirement
of its last aircraft cruiser
It would not be wise for Russia to purchase foreign aircraft carriers. They need to build their own.
@@endeliggnist5066
Indeed I meant the design
which is a sound one as both
nations operate virtually the
same air group
Build your mighty carrier!
THANKS I SERVED EX VIKRANT DURING. CONFLICT WITH PAK AND LIBERATED EAST ESTABLISHED BANGLA DESH
Thanks 👍👍👍👍
Well it's a first step towards indigenization, i mean it's the first step, the next is a 65,000 ton carrier, we already have our own indigenous nuclear submarines, I'm sure we'll be able to make nuclear powered 80,000+ ton carriers within next 60 years if possible
Depends on the strategic requirements and goals of the Navy. Nuclear powered ships tend to be very expensive to build and maintain. And they are really meant for long range operations away from home ports. So if that isn't something that is needed then it is unlikely to be considered.
The next gen 65,000 tonne carrier is likely to be more than enough. Three carriers total is the current want but I could see the new carrier being built in more than numbers. With the two 45,000 tonne and maybe 2-3 65,000 tonne being a strong enough fleet to stop anyone from trying to pick a fight.
I think that is an excessive amount of ships. At most, there would be 4 carriers, but with the already limited budget of the Indian Navy, it would take time to implement. A single large carrier which is complemented by two more normal-sized ones like the Vikrant is the most sound strategy in my opinion.
@@adventwolfbane the no of carriers doesn't matter, the carrier groups is what matters and a 45k tone or a 60-65k ton is not enough as compared to a 80k+ ton carrier which can launch more ships simultaneously and can also defend itself and also be used for offensive strikes at the same time
600billion reserves. Why they waiting?
Atleast we have started building and now possess technology
My father was a sailor in Indian Navy