Yes, of course. Analytics usually work like this: You take a transparent position and look at something from a certain angle. My brief analysis is an attempt to describe a possible (i.e. logically consistent) new look at Harry Potter.
I think it's implicitly about sexuality (just like in most vampire and werewolf stories the magic element stands for sexuality (there are dozens of books about it)). What children's books like to do is to wrap important topics that are unsuitable for children in metaphors. Harry Potter is a rather archetypal story about a child growing up. The discovery of sexuality is something quite "magical" in this process, isn't it? What I have tried to do is to take this simple and ancient metaphor to the extreme.
I have to admit that my interpretation is very strange. But I hope that it enables a new, interesting, counterintuitive but logically consistent view of Harry Potter.
It is a counterintuitive, exergetic reinterpretation that is intended to provide a new view of Harry Potter. If you want to understand Harry Potter differently, you can of course do that (as long as the interpretation is logically sound).
I think you're interpreting this in a way that you want to bro.
Yes, of course. Analytics usually work like this: You take a transparent position and look at something from a certain angle. My brief analysis is an attempt to describe a possible (i.e. logically consistent) new look at Harry Potter.
I think there is no sex in HP because it's a book for children 🤔
I think it's implicitly about sexuality (just like in most vampire and werewolf stories the magic element stands for sexuality (there are dozens of books about it)). What children's books like to do is to wrap important topics that are unsuitable for children in metaphors. Harry Potter is a rather archetypal story about a child growing up. The discovery of sexuality is something quite "magical" in this process, isn't it? What I have tried to do is to take this simple and ancient metaphor to the extreme.
what the fuck dude? 😨
he tried xD
I have to admit that my interpretation is very strange. But I hope that it enables a new, interesting, counterintuitive but logically consistent view of Harry Potter.
?
This is such a strange video... kinda sus tbh.
@@dimitrilitovsk2372 i was having fun watching grindleward vs voldemort then suddnly found this out of no where ..
It is a counterintuitive, exergetic reinterpretation that is intended to provide a new view of Harry Potter. If you want to understand Harry Potter differently, you can of course do that (as long as the interpretation is logically sound).
L