The Indian girl judge is strongly bias, when something is focusing at women which she is she strongly agree, when something may have potential to negatively impact the minority which she is in Singapore she strongly disagree.
With all the resources at its disposal, shouldn't we be asking the PAP why it didn't even bother to create new policies that address Singaporeans' concerns about minimum wage, healthcare, education, housing and retirement?
PAP Wouldn't even implement a minimum wage, and wouldn't even be willing to peg HDB flat prices to wages, wouldn't even be willing to allow more Singaporeans to go to universities
What's the credential of Vanessa ho to be a part of the people who give advice for start up?
Vanessa is a partner in a very successful fintech VC company.
The Indian girl judge is strongly bias, when something is focusing at women which she is she strongly agree, when something may have potential to negatively impact the minority which she is in Singapore she strongly disagree.
The kid talk like he was force to say what he said
2nd view first comment
The irony is that the PAP didn't even come out with much new alternative policies in its manifesto, while the WP did.
With all the resources at its disposal, shouldn't we be asking the PAP why it didn't even bother to create new policies that address Singaporeans' concerns about minimum wage, healthcare, education, housing and retirement?
PAP Wouldn't even implement a minimum wage, and wouldn't even be willing to peg HDB flat prices to wages, wouldn't even be willing to allow more Singaporeans to go to universities
PAP wouldn't allow Singaporeans to access their CPF and Medisave - all these are policy proposals Would have made in its manifesto.