Great interview, I really loved your point of view: meditative breath of fresh air from the universe🌬️ Yes, energetically we've been imbalanced ('masculine' trend: forceful, moving fast, outward to colonize and create, and shoot out of the apple core) and are now at the stage of taking over instead of valuing what we've got. Just cuz we can doesn't mean we should; We're really only responsible for the temperance/balance☯️ of our individual toroidal meditative energetic field (through physical, mental, and emotional work to reintroduce the 'feminine' : fertile to new ideas, forethought, reception, acceptance and appreciation of what we are already - enough🥰) When we know we are enough and we have enough and are appreciative and grateful for it, we no longer create from Lack and Desperation - rather, Love and Abundance - and thus we'll create a more thoughtful, timely, blessed future... Sans fear-induced nuclear warfare😂🙏🌎 appreciate you, sir!
Materialistic Neurologists do Not know the source of human Consciousness. Consciousness evolving from systems billions of years older than humans on earth, are surely advanced beyond even the imagination of humans on earth. And beyond and superior to the human biological vehicle.
Landing Dr. Kipping for an interview is like finding the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. He is our modern day Carl Sagan as far as I'm concerned. His numerous contributions to the science of Astronomy and his style of presenting in his videos, are truly enlightening and entertaining.
@@BeforeSkool Don't get me wrong. I really admire NDT and Brian Cox but Dr. kipping level of intelligence is astounding and he knows the math. He already has written several scientific papers which have been certified.
@@Kitties-of-Doom The often heard claim that it is a statistical certainty we're not alone is completely bonkers. Obviously, the answer to the question depends on the definitions you use, but based on what we know the pure statistical claim is a silly lazy argument.
Dr. Kipping is one of the best science communicators of our time. So lucky to have this type of platform and being able to hear his explanations. Big fan.
I’d really like to see Dr Kipping getting a big series on the BBC. Something akin to cosmos but not a remake. Not a retelling of facts that is space nerds all know. I love his speculative work. Something that blends facts with deep time ideas and an optimistic tone.
That was The most thought inspiring conversation I've had the pleasure of listening to in a long time. Was hoping for a little bit longer take on the singularity and AI bit, however, this was brilliant. That particular theory on simulation was new to me, but if this reality is the sewer, and if you consider each brain a computer, then in theory each human can simulate a reality.. which we essentially do during dreamtime since to the brain it's just as real as when we are awake.. Imagine an astronomer, a neuroscientist and philosopher or a practitioner of lucid dreaming having that discussion?! All the popcorn!! Anyways, that was a great ep!
Thanks for the talk. One question to the host: How can we be eternal conscious beings? That's a serious question, not a rhetorical one. How is it possible to conceive of consciousness when there is no longer a body or any way through a brain or some kind of nervous system or sensing and perceiving mechanism to be conscious of anything? If all other living beings, plants, fungi, animals are not eternal, why should human beings alone be so? Even bacteria can sense a toxic chemical and navigate away from it, or communicate with other bacteria. So it's hard to say perception and agency (usually typical of a "self") are peculiar to human beings. Perhaps consciousness is on a gradient among living forms, but then there's no intrinsic difference. Why should an individual human consciousness alone be eternal?
Mark I really liked your idea about the shape of the universe, it makes so much sense. I like to think of it as an organism personally, and I think everybody has their own view of what is the shape of its expanse. I also agree with what you said about time speeding up. I saw somebody say a few days ago it was August 1st 5 minutes ago (and so it'll be Christmas in a few hours), and I was thinking before I saw that how fast this month in particular went by (I hope the next few months don't go by this fast).
Aww yes, Terence McKenna explains the idea of time speeding up quite well. I animated this piece 5 years ago (which seems like it was yesterday) th-cam.com/video/QgEqQAIpLoo/w-d-xo.html
The Antarctica argument is so weak. The reason it's not developed is because there's an international agreement not to develop Antarctica. The entire continent is basically a protected park.
1:04:54 I could be wrong, but I think there was a study recently that showed that the placebo effect can still work even when you know it's only a sugar pill
For me, communication with intelligent civilizations is possible. Just think about this, we as humans are intelligent if we try to communicate with a dolphin. Yes, we don't understand them, but the question to ask is how intelligent they are in trying to communicate with us to make us understand. Are dolphins trying different ways to make us understand whereas humans would use drawings, language, experiments, machines, etc in trying to understand them. So if we try to communicate with aliens who are much more intelligent than us, surely they would have to have gone through the various stages of evolution in order to travel etc, so both humans and aliens would use all possible techniques in trying to communicate with each other. Even if we dont understand the language, we would try to understand body language. Use things in common for communication. Example take travel for example. We would show how we do it physically and they see what we are trying to show them and they would do the same.
Given enough time and effort, yeah, we might be able to communicate with aliens, but be realistic about what it takes. Communication with dolphins is super easy in comparison, they share a huge amount of evolutionary development with us and are genetically almost the same, I think 90% or so. Try to communicate with a fungi, still a 50% or so genetic match, slime mold or even a prokaryote, a lot harder, but I guess there may still be a few pointers on how approach it. But I can't even start to imagine how to communicate with something that developed entirely independent from us and has about zero similarity.
There are lots of people, that simply don't worship. Its called neutrality. Some of us just go trough life listening, learning and not giving an F In some sense, its like "" Lets see, how this one evolves"" Some people just cant find enough power to ultimately care. They just know, that they will age, likely might die, die before time, cuz of random psychos or accidents and they are ok with that. Just trying to fit in and be human, that`s unpredictable. should learn something any ways. Tips up... My believe on this is, I am not bound to my body.
14:35 tell us how much you could mine an asteroid and how many kilograms you can land back on earth.... seems to me its not possible to do it safe and economically viable
If all we’re talking about is having a ‘lifeboat’ to preserve the human species in case of some massive unexpected catastrophe, then it would be just as effective to build an environment in space. Or we could all just concentrate on repairing, preserving, and protecting the only environment we know we all can live in. Early humans moved, on this planet, to where the food and slightly better conditions existed - no-one ever developed gills and moved back into the seas.
Here’s a hypothesis for you…. We, as humans, for any number of reasons, lost the ability to habitate Earth. We have yet to achieve FTL travel, but we have identified the planet closest to earth which is capable of supporting life as we know it. And we have perfected targeted cryo-stasis, while integrating VR via a digital neural interface…. We are currently in route to a new planet… And life as we know it could more accurately be described as an in flight movie… C’est la vie?
Problem is you think.your clever and we're not, if dinosaurs didn't go extinct they would be millions of year's in front us like millions of other planets in A universe
But you're also ignoring the harm that religion does and belief in demonic forces and such, including even the reliance on God to fix our world when it's really up to us
The religion conversation was absolutely top tier stuff. I still believe in God and science. Not anyone else's god. My god. Luke 17:21 - The Kingdom of God is Within You.
David's take on simulation makes imho no sense, he makes what looks like silly assumptions to me. We do run simulations, then how is it possible to claim simulation may technologically not be possible? And how do you determine whether you're in a simulation, whether it is realistic or not? Obviously there will be limitations, but how are limitations in a simulation different from the limitations due to the laws of nature we encounter? The way I look at it, our universe is very analogous to the complexity development simulations we run. Start with a few simple rules, let it run and see complexity develop. Big bang = booting program, simple rules = mathematical universe/laws of nature, pixels/bits = quantization, developing complexity = elemental particles interacting and combining to everything we see around us. If you want you may even add that running simulations in parallel (on different machines, different instances on one machine or virtual machines on a hypervisor) equates the different varieties of multiverse we theorize. Don't know whether we're in a simulation, but as far as I can see everything we know about the universe is consistent with a scaled up version of the development simulations we run to study self organization and emerging complexity.
There's nothing special about simulation hypothesis. Just think about it. It's not a theory. Einstein theory can be part of simulation. Newton laws could be a part of some specific engine. I would say this hypothesis is not scientific. You can call it however you want. It won't take you anywhere. Or in the other way. Scientist are trying to find how the engine works. And there is a lot of different engines to find. Calling it all simulation won't help you.
Dr. Kipping says things aligned with the Bible. We are unique. This is the Matrix womb of God or, as the Bible calls it, The Garden of God. We, the souls born into this world, are the fruit of his garden. Like all planters, some seeds fall by the wayside, and some fall on hostile ground where growth is impossible to endure. But as for the universe, God made angels whose assignment is to care for the universe's workings. There are Angels responsible for the moon, our sun, and galaxies.
You weren't ready for Dr. Kipping, you simply didn't add to the conversation, just repeated whatever he said without any input from your part. You need to keep up..
@AfterSkool dude is a genius. It was actually really positive to see you asking questions that us mere mortals might ask. Also deeply appreciate you both having a respectful discussion on belief and science. Really really well done, so rare to see.
@@georgespalding7640 Clip from '60 is fake. Live ISIS is fake. Does it mean we didn't land on moon? No, but we should wonder why it was faked and why so much effort to keep our heads above instead focusing on below (ocean, underground).
Thanks for having me on, let’s keep talking!
Great interview, I really loved your point of view: meditative breath of fresh air from the universe🌬️
Yes, energetically we've been imbalanced ('masculine' trend: forceful, moving fast, outward to colonize and create, and shoot out of the apple core) and are now at the stage of taking over instead of valuing what we've got.
Just cuz we can doesn't mean we should; We're really only responsible for the temperance/balance☯️ of our individual toroidal meditative energetic field (through physical, mental, and emotional work to reintroduce the 'feminine' : fertile to new ideas, forethought, reception, acceptance and appreciation of what we are already - enough🥰)
When we know we are enough and we have enough and are appreciative and grateful for it, we no longer create from Lack and Desperation - rather, Love and Abundance - and thus we'll create a more thoughtful, timely, blessed future... Sans fear-induced nuclear warfare😂🙏🌎 appreciate you, sir!
If there is a designer, implementer and sustainer of Life, universe, and the laws of nature, then human Personalities surely have a cosmic purpose.
Materialistic Neurologists do Not know the source of human Consciousness.
Consciousness evolving from systems billions of years older than humans on earth, are surely advanced beyond even the imagination of humans on earth. And beyond and superior to the human biological vehicle.
so disappointed dr kipping would go on this pseudoscience cryptobro conspiracy theory circle jerk
Landing Dr. Kipping for an interview is like finding the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. He is our modern day Carl Sagan as far as I'm concerned. His numerous contributions to the science of Astronomy and his style of presenting in his videos, are truly enlightening and entertaining.
Agree 100%. He is inspiring a curiosity for a new generation.
@@BeforeSkool Don't get me wrong. I really admire NDT and Brian Cox but Dr. kipping level of intelligence is astounding and he knows the math. He already has written several scientific papers which have been certified.
Dude also thinks a reasonable thought is that we're alone in the universe.
@@Kitties-of-Doom The often heard claim that it is a statistical certainty we're not alone is completely bonkers. Obviously, the answer to the question depends on the definitions you use, but based on what we know the pure statistical claim is a silly lazy argument.
@@Kitties-of-Doom are you being sarcastic or agreeable?
Dr. Kipping is one of the best science communicators of our time. So lucky to have this type of platform and being able to hear his explanations. Big fan.
Always following David's podcast, no matter were he speaks. That's just how impactful he is to me
I’d really like to see Dr Kipping getting a big series on the BBC. Something akin to cosmos but not a remake. Not a retelling of facts that is space nerds all know.
I love his speculative work. Something that blends facts with deep time ideas and an optimistic tone.
Kipping is the best! Diggin the new channel!!!
😮 Thank you both very much for this gift!
Great work ♥️ Cheers gentlemen 🙏
Thanks for bringing David
Ok I watch everything with Dr. Kipping but after reading those comments I've got to see it NOW. Love @coolworlds!
Thank you for this interview 🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻
That was The most thought inspiring conversation I've had the pleasure of listening to in a long time. Was hoping for a little bit longer take on the singularity and AI bit, however, this was brilliant. That particular theory on simulation was new to me, but if this reality is the sewer, and if you consider each brain a computer, then in theory each human can simulate a reality.. which we essentially do during dreamtime since to the brain it's just as real as when we are awake.. Imagine an astronomer, a neuroscientist and philosopher or a practitioner of lucid dreaming having that discussion?! All the popcorn!! Anyways, that was a great ep!
It would be interesting to go deeper jnto Climate Change. Great guest ❤
No way! What a duo!!!
Thanks for the talk. One question to the host: How can we be eternal conscious beings? That's a serious question, not a rhetorical one. How is it possible to conceive of consciousness when there is no longer a body or any way through a brain or some kind of nervous system or sensing and perceiving mechanism to be conscious of anything? If all other living beings, plants, fungi, animals are not eternal, why should human beings alone be so? Even bacteria can sense a toxic chemical and navigate away from it, or communicate with other bacteria. So it's hard to say perception and agency (usually typical of a "self") are peculiar to human beings. Perhaps consciousness is on a gradient among living forms, but then there's no intrinsic difference. Why should an individual human consciousness alone be eternal?
Mark I really liked your idea about the shape of the universe, it makes so much sense. I like to think of it as an organism personally, and I think everybody has their own view of what is the shape of its expanse. I also agree with what you said about time speeding up. I saw somebody say a few days ago it was August 1st 5 minutes ago (and so it'll be Christmas in a few hours), and I was thinking before I saw that how fast this month in particular went by (I hope the next few months don't go by this fast).
Aww yes, Terence McKenna explains the idea of time speeding up quite well. I animated this piece 5 years ago (which seems like it was yesterday) th-cam.com/video/QgEqQAIpLoo/w-d-xo.html
Id love to see Kipping collab with Brian Cox.
The point of selecting for those who are religious and the term of atheism or atheists not being "real" were so unfounded.
By grace of Krishna, thank you for this gift.
We understood the aliens in arrival.
Cool worlds collide!
@59min: Yes. Strongly agree.
The Antarctica argument is so weak. The reason it's not developed is because there's an international agreement not to develop Antarctica. The entire continent is basically a protected park.
These scientists will make pikachu faces 😮 when disclosure occurs
Which is very weird, I think they are hiding something.
1:04:54 I could be wrong, but I think there was a study recently that showed that the placebo effect can still work even when you know it's only a sugar pill
Damn - that shirt!!! Would you swap 1kg of South African Coffee for a Shirt?
A fellow south African hahah. I lived in South Africa for quite long. A beautiful country.
One thing that troubles me is if we are eternally conscious beings, how come we cannot remember the eternity prior to this moment?
We are either slaves or we chose to forget. I would assume we are slaves.
god i would love to live in Antarctica for a year
You two look like brothers
For me, communication with intelligent civilizations is possible.
Just think about this, we as humans are intelligent if we try to communicate with a dolphin. Yes, we don't understand them, but the question to ask is how intelligent they are in trying to communicate with us to make us understand. Are dolphins trying different ways to make us understand whereas humans would use drawings, language, experiments, machines, etc in trying to understand them.
So if we try to communicate with aliens who are much more intelligent than us, surely they would have to have gone through the various stages of evolution in order to travel etc, so both humans and aliens would use all possible techniques in trying to communicate with each other.
Even if we dont understand the language, we would try to understand body language. Use things in common for communication.
Example take travel for example. We would show how we do it physically and they see what we are trying to show them and they would do the same.
Given enough time and effort, yeah, we might be able to communicate with aliens, but be realistic about what it takes. Communication with dolphins is super easy in comparison, they share a huge amount of evolutionary development with us and are genetically almost the same, I think 90% or so. Try to communicate with a fungi, still a 50% or so genetic match, slime mold or even a prokaryote, a lot harder, but I guess there may still be a few pointers on how approach it. But I can't even start to imagine how to communicate with something that developed entirely independent from us and has about zero similarity.
There are lots of people, that simply don't worship. Its called neutrality. Some of us just go trough life listening, learning and not giving an F In some sense, its like "" Lets see, how this one evolves"" Some people just cant find enough power to ultimately care. They just know, that they will age, likely might die, die before time, cuz of random psychos or accidents and they are ok with that. Just trying to fit in and be human, that`s unpredictable. should learn something any ways. Tips up... My believe on this is, I am not bound to my body.
You two somehow look alike, I dont know how but my brain just cant help it.
in 2069 we will still hear about how great Apollo was and how we went to the moon... and in 2169 we still won't be able to go there, hahahah
14:35 tell us how much you could mine an asteroid and how many kilograms you can land back on earth.... seems to me its not possible to do it safe and economically viable
The Belgian priest's name is Lemaitre
looks like brothers
I'm enjoying this conversation very much but the out of sync voices are very distracting.
If all we’re talking about is having a ‘lifeboat’ to preserve the human species in case of some massive unexpected catastrophe, then it would be just as effective to build an environment in space. Or we could all just concentrate on repairing, preserving, and protecting the only environment we know we all can live in.
Early humans moved, on this planet, to where the food and slightly better conditions existed - no-one ever developed gills and moved back into the seas.
#whenwhalescouldwalk
Man (men) went to the moon? No way!
39:45
17:55 When you have God you already have the question answered. I do understand how an atheist would feel terrified even in their own body through
Here’s a hypothesis for you…. We, as humans, for any number of reasons, lost the ability to habitate Earth. We have yet to achieve FTL travel, but we have identified the planet closest to earth which is capable of supporting life as we know it. And we have perfected targeted cryo-stasis, while integrating VR via a digital neural interface…. We are currently in route to a new planet…
And life as we know it could more accurately be described as an in flight movie…
C’est la vie?
I suppose some of us could be biological hosts, and the rest of us AI…
It pisses me off the host is constantly looking away from the camera while kipping is talking
TikTok brain
Ask a person in a vegitative state if they believe in God or Allah
Are they twins?
Explaining how things are done scientifically doesn’t, to me, deny God- but proves his existence even more
🇨🇳 Has the will & way 2 colonise the red planet
Problem is you think.your clever and we're not, if dinosaurs didn't go extinct they would be millions of year's in front us like millions of other planets in A universe
But you're also ignoring the harm that religion does and belief in demonic forces and such, including even the reliance on God to fix our world when it's really up to us
That's true. If god exists, it doesn't want to meddle into our evolution. But we can choose to follow the good the true and the beautiful.
Er
JASON BRESHEARS
ARCHAIX
WILL EXPLAIN
AND YOU AIN'T GONNA
LIKE IT
9:07 the actully interview starts here ffs
7:54 ffs just talk about ya topic dont bore us with ya hates about youtube ffs 😂
Ya look like cousins
The religion conversation was absolutely top tier stuff. I still believe in God and science. Not anyone else's god. My god. Luke 17:21 - The Kingdom of God is Within You.
The thing is, you don’t have to ‘believe’ in science. It’s not a religion after all.
Disappointingly tedious.
{:o:O:}
Worst interview ever, I feel so bad for David. Is this interviewer slow or something?
David's take on simulation makes imho no sense, he makes what looks like silly assumptions to me. We do run simulations, then how is it possible to claim simulation may technologically not be possible? And how do you determine whether you're in a simulation, whether it is realistic or not? Obviously there will be limitations, but how are limitations in a simulation different from the limitations due to the laws of nature we encounter? The way I look at it, our universe is very analogous to the complexity development simulations we run. Start with a few simple rules, let it run and see complexity develop. Big bang = booting program, simple rules = mathematical universe/laws of nature, pixels/bits = quantization, developing complexity = elemental particles interacting and combining to everything we see around us. If you want you may even add that running simulations in parallel (on different machines, different instances on one machine or virtual machines on a hypervisor) equates the different varieties of multiverse we theorize. Don't know whether we're in a simulation, but as far as I can see everything we know about the universe is consistent with a scaled up version of the development simulations we run to study self organization and emerging complexity.
There's nothing special about simulation hypothesis. Just think about it. It's not a theory. Einstein theory can be part of simulation. Newton laws could be a part of some specific engine. I would say this hypothesis is not scientific. You can call it however you want. It won't take you anywhere. Or in the other way. Scientist are trying to find how the engine works. And there is a lot of different engines to find. Calling it all simulation won't help you.
Kipping is a human cliché generator. Always plays it safe with his words. Lack of imagination imo...
Are you guys cousins or something? 😂
Dr. Kipping says things aligned with the Bible. We are unique. This is the Matrix womb of God or, as the Bible calls it, The Garden of God. We, the souls born into this world, are the fruit of his garden. Like all planters, some seeds fall by the wayside, and some fall on hostile ground where growth is impossible to endure. But as for the universe, God made angels whose assignment is to care for the universe's workings. There are Angels responsible for the moon, our sun, and galaxies.
Delusional or Baked?
@@GraveFable25What is worse than being stupid? ...Not knowing it!
@@allenstewart5624 indeed...
You weren't ready for Dr. Kipping, you simply didn't add to the conversation, just repeated whatever he said without any input from your part. You need to keep up..
Dr. Kipping is brilliant. I was doing my best to keep up. I know there’s a lot of room for improvement. My mission is to get better with each podcast.
You did a stellar job. Thank you for the opportunity to further my journey to a higher quality of spiritual awareness
Maybe you should think about slowing down
@AfterSkool dude is a genius. It was actually really positive to see you asking questions that us mere mortals might ask. Also deeply appreciate you both having a respectful discussion on belief and science. Really really well done, so rare to see.
@@ianknox5710 Thank you!
First 20 mins pure bullshit.
You already lost me
@@kundavanriel6142 you lost yourself.
It saddens me greatly that there are still people believing in fairies, feng shui, scientology, Christianity, astrology, palm reading etc.
Two guys talking absolute shite
I could do that for a living
But I chose not to
Absolute shite
Not with that attitude you couldn’t.
Since they affirmed that we moon landed I closed the podcast. From here on all will be bias
@@Libertaddeexpresiones there's always one of those funny FlatEarthers in the comment section.
@@georgespalding7640 Clip from '60 is fake. Live ISIS is fake. Does it mean we didn't land on moon? No, but we should wonder why it was faked and why so much effort to keep our heads above instead focusing on below (ocean, underground).
@@Libertaddeexpresiones you know how stupid you sound bro?
Good luck finding a reputable physics PhD that doesn't. Maybe that should clue you into something.
Boring af