This video exposes DogPack404's "I Worked for Mr. Beast, He's a Fraud" drama and issue video in defense of Mr. Beast. And no. I am not controlled opposition.
My main skepticism when dealing with this guy(I never believed him) was the time it took place, while the cris situation was happening people started blaming mrbeast by association but after a while people stopped targeting mrbeat dogpack first video came out, I found that suspicious also I thought, where was the evidence he didn't get any video evidence so I thought there was a possibility that they were faking the "evidence" he had
i love how he just assumes ludwig or whatever that guy is cheats at video games just like how he assumed mrbeast did all this bullcrap also i love how player does shrooms but complains about chocolate bars. thats insane. edit: i feel like dogpack404 also trys to make everyone confused on either if he is joking, or if he isnt, so if someone calls him out for something stupid he said, he can just say it was a joke, just like he did with the whole antichrist thing.
in regards to changing opinions ; changing opinions when you are presented reasonable facts - is valid! , being strong willed does not mean being stubborn or hard headed. I hope younger men that read this comment take this to heart.
Please be careful with claiming that the mail in loophole is never used. I don't know what kind of a bubble you live in but I live in WA State and I've come across many sweepstakes that do this. How have you never heard of PCH? Do you never read cereal box promos? Etc. It's easier to arge that it's COMMON, not rare! DogPack had a solid argument with that one. It's only online influencers that usually don't do that. If you see a promo on a Doritos bag advertising a giveaway, you can be sure that you don't actually have to buy anything from Doritos to enter the sweepstakes.
I think the only thing in his video that truly stands up is the illegal lottery allegations. The rest of it just seems like fluff to increase the video's length.
imo you can only count the streams as illegal lotteries which he doesnt do anymore. since the feastables thing had a no purchase neccesarry on the website to buy. Its the same as mcdonalds yearly giveaways or that one coca cola magiccans thing
Overall pretty good video and I think you provided a lot of valid criticisms in regards to dogpacks exposé videos. I would like to offer a rebuttal to the kids argument you presented in the video. I find the argument “if you mention kids you’ve already lost” to be entirely irrelevant to the accusation towards Mr Beast in regards to the illegal lotteries. While the analogies you presented were very representative of bad arguments using kids as a crutch for a moral high ground. They’re completely dis analogous considering the fact the scenarios you presented were parents allowing their kids to consume/be influenced by products/services meant for ADULTS (beer, rated M games). Where as Mr Beast videos are designed to be kid friendly and Mr Beast himself has acknowledge the majority of his audience are children. This is also supported by his toy line and feastables chocolates. Both products which are highly consumed by children and one targeted specifically at children, unlike beer and rated M games. Also the illegal lotteries are just a scummy business practice. While it’s fair to argue adults should simply be responsible with their money, it doesn’t excuse Mr Beast from engaging in a predatory business practice. This is only made worse by the fact it’s largely directed at children, which from my earlier point I find completely fair to argue given this particular context. Again, overall really insightful video, and I did walk away with somewhat of a perspective shift overall.
7:40 I already knew this was false, I spoke to a guy who was pretty adamant about being in a MR beast video, specifically the squid games one even told me the number on the shirt he was wearing. I live nowhere near NC. Take this with a grain of salt though.
not to argue against the OC just adding to the discourse also not covering to many points or wed be here all day 1.the basis of his argument was that he couldn't solidly prove his argument (fair but weak argument) not accounting for the fact that that speech would be controlled but his NDA 2. he did not show any new instance of people outside of dog packs specified groups appearing in videos 3.his attack on the evidence surrounding the 100 boys vs 100 girls is also irrelevant to his argument and also leave out the fact that the video portrayed them as real contestants 4. he focuses on the fact he was a short term employee and ignores the claim dog pack made about helping on Mr. beast productions before being hired 5. he reads "i think the results were pretty much rigged" as "he thinks the results are rigged" taking it from a semi certain tone to a not quite sure tone again not attacking @subarumu just jumping of his comment to make my own points again take my points whith a grain of salt all debate is unfair in the end
Good Mythical Morning do the exact same "mail in entry" for their "Golden Tee" sweepstakes. It's a common practice, no one doing sweepstakes want people to enter for free. (Though GMM do mention no purchase necessary in all of their promotions, EXCEPT for Instagram posts.)
@@vibez2806 that's because unlike ludwig, oompa didn't try to dig deep with his questions and didn't even really provide any arguments for mrbeast or against mrbeast. he just kept blindly defending mrbeast until dogpack was able to convince him into changing his mind. Oompa is a good guy, not a good interviewer.
When and if that apology video comes out for Mr. Beast?I'm gonna be a laugh and cause people are gonna be people gonna be peach.Headed, I'm gonna be a laughing.I'm gonna make my first video and i'm gonna say I was right
I haven’t even watched this video but I just find it a bit funny how people have said that dogpacks video seemed like it was being black listed and wasn’t showing up on peoples recommended feed yet this doesn’t even have 500 views and is on my recommended. Not hating just interesting to think about
I heard about dogpack's video straight from the recommended feed before I saw anyone else's video. But I have also been watching a lot of beast related videos recently so it's possible if you don't watch beast content you wouldn't recommend these types of videos.
no wonder this mf got fired within less a month, with how last stream he talked to ludwig itself lol. goodthing someone pointed this out with a video. gj man
@@alphamineron dude the joke is supposed to be “you have room temp IQ.” But you couldn’t even say that without fumbling it. Like, You’re not that smart my guy. Sit down💀
@@Marryjanesbudyou do realize that he is saying the same thing but just in the difference way right?? Jeez your intelligence matches the room temp too
This is a very well put together video. You've opened my mind a little more than it was before. I always thought some of the things dogpack brought to the table didnt have much evidence. I do think Mr.Beast is in the wrong for many things but not everything that is going around. Also honestly most of the things i don't care about, his job is to entertain and hes going to do what he feels is the best way to do so. Watch it or dont watch it I don't think it matters to him.
@@Dranzelwhat holes?? He called ludwig a control opposition because he was being a little snake. He started the internet by asking if he is on drugs and then if he ever did drugs. He was trying to act like dogpack is some drug addict Now go look at his oompa interview to see the difference
@@vibez2806 the speculation about shit he has no proof about like the yatch thing, when asked about specific information gets defensive and says that he wants to make him break his NDA, then asks what can I even ask, about videos I haven't worked, but then says asks me anything I'm an open book. also that the guy comes across as an absolute nutcase clout chaser, you people really don't see what you don't want to see
@@Dranzel get defensive?? What?? He was calling him out causw it is clear that he was trying to get him to break his nda and didn't care to watch the video. Hence why his whole comment section and even him is saying that he did bad there
I really hope more people see this, because no matter who is right everyone should hear both sides of the argument.
need this to go viral, everyone needs to see this and see that dogpack is just a sad pissy guy
"Are you controlled opposition working for Mr. Beast?"
Nah, he's just removing comments that disagree with him..
@alexdinu2746 I found plenty of comments that are disagreeing with him and also insulting him so I don't know what you're talking about.😂
Tell me about it
This guy makes some valid points
My main skepticism when dealing with this guy(I never believed him) was the time it took place, while the cris situation was happening people started blaming mrbeast by association but after a while people stopped targeting mrbeat dogpack first video came out, I found that suspicious also I thought, where was the evidence he didn't get any video evidence so I thought there was a possibility that they were faking the "evidence" he had
Guys, he's just typical redditor. Typical salty internet user who wanted clout. That's it
Yeah, even though he was chasing clout, he didn't even bother to at least present actual evidence and instead make up bullshit.
he salty bcs he got fired
by the way, the illegal lotteries would not be enforced as MrBeast didn't exaggerate Time, Prize, and Price.
i love how he just assumes ludwig or whatever that guy is cheats at video games just like how he assumed mrbeast did all this bullcrap
also i love how player does shrooms but complains about chocolate bars. thats insane.
edit: i feel like dogpack404 also trys to make everyone confused on either if he is joking, or if he isnt, so if someone calls him out for something stupid he said, he can just say it was a joke, just like he did with the whole antichrist thing.
Honestly I’m surprised Ludwig didn’t make a vid about interviewing this guy. He seems like a nuerodivergent mess that might need a therapist
in regards to changing opinions ;
changing opinions when you are presented reasonable facts - is valid! , being strong willed does not mean being stubborn or hard headed. I hope younger men that read this comment take this to heart.
Please be careful with claiming that the mail in loophole is never used. I don't know what kind of a bubble you live in but I live in WA State and I've come across many sweepstakes that do this. How have you never heard of PCH? Do you never read cereal box promos? Etc. It's easier to arge that it's COMMON, not rare! DogPack had a solid argument with that one. It's only online influencers that usually don't do that. If you see a promo on a Doritos bag advertising a giveaway, you can be sure that you don't actually have to buy anything from Doritos to enter the sweepstakes.
I think the only thing in his video that truly stands up is the illegal lottery allegations. The rest of it just seems like fluff to increase the video's length.
imo you can only count the streams as illegal lotteries which he doesnt do anymore. since the feastables thing had a no purchase neccesarry on the website to buy. Its the same as mcdonalds yearly giveaways or that one coca cola magiccans thing
he wasnt getting water, he was avoiding the question LMAO
Overall pretty good video and I think you provided a lot of valid criticisms in regards to dogpacks exposé videos.
I would like to offer a rebuttal to the kids argument you presented in the video. I find the argument “if you mention kids you’ve already lost” to be entirely irrelevant to the accusation towards Mr Beast in regards to the illegal lotteries.
While the analogies you presented were very representative of bad arguments using kids as a crutch for a moral high ground. They’re completely dis analogous considering the fact the scenarios you presented were parents allowing their kids to consume/be influenced by products/services meant for ADULTS (beer, rated M games).
Where as Mr Beast videos are designed to be kid friendly and Mr Beast himself has acknowledge the majority of his audience are children. This is also supported by his toy line and feastables chocolates. Both products which are highly consumed by children and one targeted specifically at children, unlike beer and rated M games.
Also the illegal lotteries are just a scummy business practice. While it’s fair to argue adults should simply be responsible with their money, it doesn’t excuse Mr Beast from engaging in a predatory business practice. This is only made worse by the fact it’s largely directed at children, which from my earlier point I find completely fair to argue given this particular context.
Again, overall really insightful video, and I did walk away with somewhat of a perspective shift overall.
It's so weird how people deflect this criticism but are unable to back it up
7:40 I already knew this was false, I spoke to a guy who was pretty adamant about being in a MR beast video, specifically the squid games one even told me the number on the shirt he was wearing. I live nowhere near NC. Take this with a grain of salt though.
not to argue against the OC just adding to the discourse also not covering to many points or wed be here all day
1.the basis of his argument was that he couldn't solidly prove his argument (fair but weak argument) not accounting for the fact that that speech would be controlled but his NDA
2. he did not show any new instance of people outside of dog packs specified groups appearing in videos
3.his attack on the evidence surrounding the 100 boys vs 100 girls is also irrelevant to his argument and also leave out the fact that the video portrayed them as real contestants
4. he focuses on the fact he was a short term employee and ignores the claim dog pack made about helping on Mr. beast productions before being hired
5. he reads "i think the results were pretty much rigged" as "he thinks the results are rigged" taking it from a semi certain tone to a not quite sure tone
again not attacking @subarumu just jumping of his comment to make my own points again take my points whith a grain of salt all debate is unfair in the end
This is actually really well articulated, i hope more people see this.
bro might destroy dogpack
Was he shoved in lockers as a kid?
Good Mythical Morning do the exact same "mail in entry" for their "Golden Tee" sweepstakes. It's a common practice, no one doing sweepstakes want people to enter for free.
(Though GMM do mention no purchase necessary in all of their promotions, EXCEPT for Instagram posts.)
Because of a dog pack.Alikoka got in a trouble scroll screw dog Pack.
404
Yeah, Ali Koca was actually right in the wrong way.
What the real controlled opposition was the friends we made along the way
youtube needs a repost feature
"that feastabeles A CHOCLATE BAR is healthy."
It’s healthier than Hershey’s.
healthy than harshey and dogpack is not do a fair debate he compare with a large size of feastables and straight size of harsheys
idk this whole situation is really weird
Well the U.S. justice system is innocent till proven guilty so maybe that’s why he is saying “allegedly”
I watched it live, that guy was a complete nutjob, didn't answer any questions and then said to ask anything like wtf
Cause ludwig was being a controlled opposition, there is a reason that his oompa interview is much better
@@vibez2806 that's because unlike ludwig, oompa didn't try to dig deep with his questions and didn't even really provide any arguments for mrbeast or against mrbeast. he just kept blindly defending mrbeast until dogpack was able to convince him into changing his mind. Oompa is a good guy, not a good interviewer.
When and if that apology video comes out for Mr. Beast?I'm gonna be a laugh and cause people are gonna be people gonna be peach.Headed, I'm gonna be a laughing.I'm gonna make my first video and i'm gonna say I was right
I haven’t even watched this video but I just find it a bit funny how people have said that dogpacks video seemed like it was being black listed and wasn’t showing up on peoples recommended feed yet this doesn’t even have 500 views and is on my recommended. Not hating just interesting to think about
I heard about dogpack's video straight from the recommended feed before I saw anyone else's video. But I have also been watching a lot of beast related videos recently so it's possible if you don't watch beast content you wouldn't recommend these types of videos.
I got dogpacks vid in my recommended in the first 24 hours and I wasn't even subscribed to him. What are u talking about?
I got the dogpack on my recommended feed too.
Hmmmmm what if u take out the ST and put CH in stucky ?????
Sol's Rng!
Sal’s Ring*
Well, well, well.
no wonder this mf got fired within less a month, with how last stream he talked to ludwig itself lol. goodthing someone pointed this out with a video. gj man
@@alphamineron dude the joke is supposed to be
“you have room temp IQ.”
But you couldn’t even say that without fumbling it. Like, You’re not that smart my guy. Sit down💀
@@alphamineronwhat does “your room temperature” mean?
@@Marryjanesbudyou do realize that he is saying the same thing but just in the difference way right?? Jeez your intelligence matches the room temp too
Is this gonna go back and forth
please go viral
And it’s sad
Keep em coming! 👍❤💪
How the heck do you only have 25 subs
seems like another person trying to "expose" mrbeast for clout
what
This is a very well put together video. You've opened my mind a little more than it was before. I always thought some of the things dogpack brought to the table didnt have much evidence. I do think Mr.Beast is in the wrong for many things but not everything that is going around. Also honestly most of the things i don't care about, his job is to entertain and hes going to do what he feels is the best way to do so. Watch it or dont watch it I don't think it matters to him.
Is he doctor Shawn or something?
I suibscribed. Can I have my cookie now ? please !
hope this goes viral
Real
love this
Good video, good work. Deserves more views
You are controled opposition
So is dogpack telethon boy.
No, in my opinion you are controlled opposition
Mrbeast aint gonna give u a lambo blud
Why y'all getting so defensive when someone points out the holes in this shit?
@@Dranzelwhat holes?? He called ludwig a control opposition because he was being a little snake. He started the internet by asking if he is on drugs and then if he ever did drugs. He was trying to act like dogpack is some drug addict
Now go look at his oompa interview to see the difference
@@vibez2806 the speculation about shit he has no proof about like the yatch thing, when asked about specific information gets defensive and says that he wants to make him break his NDA, then asks what can I even ask, about videos I haven't worked, but then says asks me anything I'm an open book. also that the guy comes across as an absolute nutcase clout chaser, you people really don't see what you don't want to see
@@Dranzel get defensive?? What?? He was calling him out causw it is clear that he was trying to get him to break his nda and didn't care to watch the video. Hence why his whole comment section and even him is saying that he did bad there
Dogpack404 ain't gonna allegedly give you money for defending him
Thanks for opening my eyes for this, you sure are right in your points about that guy