The pilots were clowns. They did not recognize the fuel leak and carried on. They could have diverted much earlier and safer. Instead they almost killed everybody.
@@joepatroni8777 they had no idea it was a leak, because the oil gave two different reading that had no real meaning, first it was too cold and then it was contaminated?? It was a 50-50, one was the captain and the other was the pilot. The pilot said it was computer error while the FO insisted it was leak. The AirTransat maintenance was literally to be held accountable for the second hand part they put in the plane from an older aircraft. Also, because of air congestion, they were forced to divert course which made their path longer and forced them to activate the ditching procedure ultimately. They were absolutely not clowns, they managed to land the plane and everyone survived.
@@iamadreamer7461 I disagree. But to each their own. IMO if at a fuel checkpoint you don't have the required fuel, you don't mess around questioning whether the gauges are working or not.. You divert NOW. Especially when over an ocean!!! They (The Captain) put their stupid pilot pride in front of passenger safety. The copilot should have been more assertive and the captain not such an ass.They were so close to killing hundreds of people.
@@joepatroni8777 If you could understand french and listen to his interviews, then maybe you wouldn't be that stupid. He explained all of it very clearly. For now keep speculating.
A very well experienced pilot can also commit mistakes by decision making yet still can manage to find alternative ways to do something great that make big changes to avoid the same mistakes. Respect to the both pilot incharged.
The pilots were partly blamed for not using a checklist that could’ve warned them earlier. However, what is more important is what they did succeed in. They did their jobs as pilots and they saved everyone onboard. Captain Piche was 65 when he retired from flying in 2017.
From what I recall, the checklist/manual said nothing about fuel disappearing at an unusual rate, and said that if a tank was lower they should pump fuel into it from the other tanks to equalize everything, meaning they were pumping the fuel they had into the leaking tank. They believed it was instrumentation, but followed the manual. This was obviously a bad idea, if the tank is falsely reading low you wouldn't want to pump more fuel into it, and if it's leaking you probably want to pump the remaining fuel out of it into a good tank. The manual was revised as a result, though I somewhat question their wisdom in following it in the first place when it seemed to go against all logic.
sparrowlt I have read and seen. They did 0 wrong things, given what they had. They couldn't know there was a fuel leak. There wasn't an alarm back then. Everything they did was right.
For the record, if you're out of fuel and you put your gear down, the gear takes at least a minute to come down. The gear doesn't even come down that fast if you HAVE fuel.
@@CharlieND I just read that falling from a freefall setting looks very much like that. Also, if there was very low hydraulic fluid, there would not be enough pressure in the system to provide drop resistance in the wheel assemblies.
Special conditions do require special actions but also need special skills! WOW! (Yes they figured out some pilot mistakes in not closing the fuel pipes... and maybe have enough fuel left with 1 engine..) but I say in theory afterwards it is always easy to say, if you are up there fighting against time it's a totally different thing! Respect to the crew!! What a psychological stress for the pilots and still perform under this! WOW!
pretty sure quebecoise french is just french with a side order of dit-calice en Anglaise (sorry, don't know the word for cuss, so I just go with "saying chalice" because one Quebec swear is "calice", from the repertoire of Catholic cussing)
While this was an amazing job by the pilots, they were actually very lucky that their flight plan has changed before take off. Should they have sticked with the former flight plan, they would not make it to the airport. Another thing is that captain made a major mistake when he opened those fuel transfer valves LOL
To qualify the transfer of fuel from one engine to the other a "major mistake" is incorrect and too strong a statement. No explanation required... In addition, we now know that the Captain soon rectified this 'attempt' by reversing the transfer to what it was. Yes, there was luck...., but there was especially a tremendous experience (from countless severe weather conditions the Commandant had experienced) ; and, of course, the willpower and determination ('fueled' by adrenaline) of Commandant Piché. I write those lines as this accomplishment is celebrated this year (August 23, 2021) with a 50 minutes Documentary. I also would like to remind everyone that the entire flight as well as what Mr. Piché did that day is now taught and is one of the simulations at the CAE (in Montreal).
Wow that was hilarious. They made the captain act like a psychopath. And if you really want to howl with laughter turn on the closed captioning for english. Your welcome.
Does the movie mentions how Piche was the one who caused the problem by ignoring the ECAM fuel imbalance warning disregarding them as "computer bugs" and made it worst opening the crossfeed valve (if he suspected a computer bug why he opened the valve like if it was a real problem?) .. He alone converted what should have been a "lost one engine" emergency into a total loss of power emergency....in the middle of the Atlantic..
Well, maybe. But also nobody told him that the engine of the airplane was replaced with a new one, and that they used parts of the old one that were not compatible with the new engine. In any case, what he did was pretty impressive.
Talote1983 Sorry.. i have tried to understand from his point of view.. but it doesnt make sense.. because it was simply logic.. logic that plus knownledge and experience is what a captain or any plane pilot must have. first you get 2 warnings in engine 2 : high oil press and low oil temp (both are related).. but no big deal.. later you get a fuel imbalance warning indicating that there is LESS fuel in the right wing tanks ..wich are the ones that feed engine 2.. Stop there.. 2 engine warnings indicating oil is too cold and fuel imbalance in that very same tank? Even if you dont deduce fuel leak.. you have to acept something is going on in the right engine ..maybe its drinking more fuel.. maybe some pump fauilure.. but 3 separared events on engine 2? And then.. you decided it must be a computer bug.. in the middle of the Atlantic with 300 people on board..and then decide to treat the fuel imbalance as if it was real opening the crossfeed...and look at how fast the fuel drains up to the very end.. Sorry.. i fail to see any logic in continuing and disregarding those as computer bugs yet treating the worst of them as real but not believing its real...it all ended in the wors outcome: acelerated fuel leak and extend to all fuel tanks until you lose all power ..in the middle of the Atlantic with 300 people on board
Oh look, another TH-cam armchair pilot - with the benefit of a full transcript of the events - talking shit about those that were actually there. How impressed we are...
sparrowlt that's not how the events actually happened. There's a documentary about it in NG about aerial disasters that shows you how the pilot came to that conclusion. Wrong or not, he managed to land a jet plane with no engines.
Similar but wrong engines were replaced on this plane causing the fuel lines to chafe overtime and lose fuel midflight. It’s always better to have a former convicted drug runner pilot at the helm in cases like this who knows how to fly under duress.
lol yeh how about a nice flight on a plane with no fule yeh I wanna burst my fucking tires I wanna glide this shit to make it crash lol yeh let's go gliding bitches said captain nunnut
In an interview, Piche said the plane bounced 30 feet into the air. When it touched down again, he applied all the brakes, knowing he would lose control if the plane bounced a second time.
7 miles from final, 12,000 feet. Assuming that's nautical miles, that would give a glide angle of 3.54:1, or coming in at about 16 degrees angle. In a plane, that's a pretty steep glide - about how steep, maybe a little steeper than the Space Shuttle comes in. No way an airliner could come down that steep without flaps or spoilers, even with the gear down. Maybe not do another 360, but some S-turns would be a good idea. Or maybe put it into a sideslip - wonder why he didn't do that, that's what the pilot of the Gimli Glider did. This pilot, like the Gimli Glider pilot, was experienced with gliders (where they train using sideslips to come down quickly in situations like this), and this was after the Gimli Glider so he surely knew of that story and how that pilot slipped it in.
@@louistremblay1218 Ah, makes sense. This movie feels like it's more about the drama than what actually happened. Both this and the Gimli Glider landed very fast, had more energy than desired, but that's better that than having not enough. Both managed to stop before the end of the runway. I recall a flight instructor telling me to error on the too fast side, as it's better to hit something at the far end of the field at 10 knots than at the near end at 50 knots (thinking of a Cessna here).
This is incorrect. From Wikipedia: "Piché executed one 360° turn, and then a series of "S" turns, to dissipate excess altitude. At 06:45 UTC, the plane touched down hard, around 1,030 ft (310 m) past the threshold of runway 33, at a speed around 200 knots (370 km/h; 230 mph) [Typical landing speed, depending on weight, seems to be around 160 - 200 knots, but the fuel tanks were empty, so 140 - 170 knots would probably be closer.], bounced once, and then touched down again, roughly 2,800 ft (850 m) from the threshold. Maximum emergency braking was applied and retained, and the plane came to a stop after a landing run that consumed 7,600 ft (2,300 m) of the 10,000-foot (3,000 m) runway. Because the antiskid and brake modulation systems were inoperative,[a] the eight main wheels locked up, the tires abraded and fully deflated within 450 ft (140 m), and the wheels themselves were worn down to the axle journals during rollout. Fourteen passengers and two crew members had minor injuries, while two passengers had serious injuries during the evacuation of the aircraft. The plane suffered structural damage to the main landing gear (from the hard touchdown and the abrasion of the locked wheels against the runway surface during the landing roll) and the lower fuselage (both structural deformation from the hard touchdown and various punctures from impact by pieces of debris shed from the main landing gear).
I like how a plane can still fly for long time with experienced pilots after no engines. Like when someone turns the rotor off in a helicopter and landing with no engine power.
8:02 bad physics. In a level turn, the force on the objects inside should be perpendicular to the longitudinal and lateral axes. The oxygen masks shouldn't move.
That's the main problem you have with this clip? Well OK, I'll tell you what they were thinking. They were thinking, either we find a way that this movie gets made with the budget we've been given, or it won't get made at all. That's called working within your constraints. What's less forgivable IMO is the depiction of the cockpit crew to the initial emergency. i understand they were going for emotional effect in trying to tie the passengers' experience to that of the pilots in charge, and placing that over a suitably morose soundtrack. That's all well and good, except no trained crew would act like these actors acted when faced with a situation of this magnitude. For starters, you certainly don't close your eyes for a few precious seconds. There's just no time to spare in deep contemplation of possible outcomes. Only well-rehearsed checklists and standard CRM skills would occupy any trained pilots' time from the start of an emergency to safe arrival the gate. Listen to the CVR of UA 232. You likely won't find it in full, but the best source is a British show from the 90s called 'Black Box'. The portion of interest is where Capt. Al Haynes hears the lead FA approaching for guidance from the flight crew, and he says, "unlock that fucking door" as the hydraulic quantity alarms are going off. They are deep into diagnostics in hopes of learning how best they can steer their plane from differential thrust alone. That's not the only example, but it's probably the most accessible one I can think of.
@@9999AWC True. Of all the things they could've done better with a bigger budget/more time, the CGI bothered me the least. With the same limited resources, if only they had consulted some actual pilots, and instead showed a kids' cartoon animation of the plane crashing, I wouldn't have been so taken out of the moment, because I know that no trained pilot would act the way those two actors did. Maybe they were trying to give a sense of time standing still for the general audience, but this just doesn't happen. There's simply too much to be done, and done fast.
Why didnt it show thee ram air turbine? people will be confused as to why the pilots had some instruments displayed. Also why didn't they deploy the landing gear earlier, that would have create much more drag and go them to a lower altitude.
No Hydraulics? Yeah sure. And how did he control the Aircraft without it? They at least could`ve included the RAT (Ram Air Turbine). Because in the real event, they deployed it to get some hydraulics and electrical systems back.
They are absolutely not frenchies . They are francophone canadians . Again you are one of those countless anglophones unable to make the difference between french and francophone . Go reading books .
Too steep and too fast; no hydraulics and no speed brakes; landing gear brakes dialled in at 100% which is why all main bogey tires burst within seconds of touching down. Lajes is a military base. It sits high on an island. At the end of the runway is a steep cliff overlooking the ocean. There’s no go-arounds for these people
![FDR - 2002 BB Five Inc. Gulfstream V N777TY accident - [Landing gear failure] 14 February 2002](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/V_1NT5XIJxI/mqdefault.jpg)
![FDR - 2002 BB Five Inc. Gulfstream V N777TY accident - [Landing gear failure] 14 February 2002](/img/tr.png)
All the Respect and Honor to Pilots who saved this flight. This is speechless.
The pilots were clowns. They did not recognize the fuel leak and carried on. They could have diverted much earlier and safer. Instead they almost killed everybody.
@@joepatroni8777 okay but still. They literally glided 172km, landed the plane safely and were awarded for this.
@@joepatroni8777 they had no idea it was a leak, because the oil gave two different reading that had no real meaning, first it was too cold and then it was contaminated?? It was a 50-50, one was the captain and the other was the pilot. The pilot said it was computer error while the FO insisted it was leak. The AirTransat maintenance was literally to be held accountable for the second hand part they put in the plane from an older aircraft. Also, because of air congestion, they were forced to divert course which made their path longer and forced them to activate the ditching procedure ultimately. They were absolutely not clowns, they managed to land the plane and everyone survived.
@@iamadreamer7461 I disagree. But to each their own. IMO if at a fuel checkpoint you don't have the required fuel, you don't mess around questioning whether the gauges are working or not.. You divert NOW. Especially when over an ocean!!! They (The Captain) put their stupid pilot pride in front of passenger safety. The copilot should have been more assertive and the captain not such an ass.They were so close to killing hundreds of people.
@@joepatroni8777 If you could understand french and listen to his interviews, then maybe you wouldn't be that stupid. He explained all of it very clearly. For now keep speculating.
That's the longest glide for a passenger plane.120km.That pilot is a badass,well done!!!
120km with no fuel! That’s no easy task... especially with a heavy passenger jet
Depents on weather and feet
It was good it happened in the morning. They had visuals.
What about Gimli Glider?
It ran out of fuel at 41,000 feet
A very well experienced pilot can also commit mistakes by decision making yet still can manage to find alternative ways to do something great that make big changes to avoid the same mistakes. Respect to the both pilot incharged.
The pilots were partly blamed for not using a checklist that could’ve warned them earlier. However, what is more important is what they did succeed in. They did their jobs as pilots and they saved everyone onboard. Captain Piche was 65 when he retired from flying in 2017.
It was not in the manual. Airbus had to rewrite the manual -- a sign they overlooked something.
From what I recall, the checklist/manual said nothing about fuel disappearing at an unusual rate, and said that if a tank was lower they should pump fuel into it from the other tanks to equalize everything, meaning they were pumping the fuel they had into the leaking tank. They believed it was instrumentation, but followed the manual. This was obviously a bad idea, if the tank is falsely reading low you wouldn't want to pump more fuel into it, and if it's leaking you probably want to pump the remaining fuel out of it into a good tank. The manual was revised as a result, though I somewhat question their wisdom in following it in the first place when it seemed to go against all logic.
U a hater my friend . They have change the Checklist after then investigation .
Take it away, Robert. Unyielding confidence. 45 years experience. Wow. Great job.
the film is based on true story
Really Yamanashi???
@@joepatroni8777 yes
@@joepatroni8777 yes, it was based on the Air Transat incident, can't remember the flight number but it was similar to the Gimli Glider incident
@@chootanf Air Transat 236
No
Fucking pilot has balls of steel!
Hero.
You call a hero fixing the big mess you created yourself?
billybob joe
the crew did a LOT wrong.. just read about this incident
sparrowlt I have read and seen. They did 0 wrong things, given what they had. They couldn't know there was a fuel leak. There wasn't an alarm back then. Everything they did was right.
what they did was right but it could have been avoided had they not made the mistakes they did.
Qilt They made no mistakes but whatever.
For the people who are critisizing this movie, it's a movie, not a fuckig aircrash investigation.
Its baste on a real story
@@sabrikatoglu8668 based*
Only this is on the facts
My friends dad was on this flight
I feel bad for your friends dad
My ass was on this flight
@The Suliccie Productions not sure, haven’t seen him
@The Suliccie Productions yes he survived the landing but he might’ve died recently because he’s older
Legend
Amazing. Probably my favorite AC investigation story ever.
For the record, if you're out of fuel and you put your gear down, the gear takes at least a minute to come down. The gear doesn't even come down that fast if you HAVE fuel.
Ziggmanster the plane didn't have any power. the weight of the wheels make them drop and lock into position.
random person 1216 I know that. But even then the wheels don't drop that fast. For Qantas flight 32 it took 4 minutes.
@@CharlieND I just read that falling from a freefall setting looks very much like that. Also, if there was very low hydraulic fluid, there would not be enough pressure in the system to provide drop resistance in the wheel assemblies.
@Beau Cat !
1: It's a movie. A dramatic reenactment.
They put Portuguese language in this!!! Well accurate!
Canada loves there gliding planes.
True 😂
Special conditions do require special actions but also need special skills! WOW! (Yes they figured out some pilot mistakes in not closing the fuel pipes... and maybe have enough fuel left with 1 engine..) but I say in theory afterwards it is always easy to say, if you are up there fighting against time it's a totally different thing! Respect to the crew!! What a psychological stress for the pilots and still perform under this! WOW!
Learned a new phrase in Québecois (French) here:
9:40 "Wot de faaaque?!" translation: "Qu'est-ce qui se passe?!" (i.e. "What's happening?!")
it's the accent... he i saying what the fuck.
The subtitles disagree with you
pretty sure quebecoise french is just french with a side order of dit-calice en Anglaise (sorry, don't know the word for cuss, so I just go with "saying chalice" because one Quebec swear is "calice", from the repertoire of Catholic cussing)
Nono it’s what the foque. Foque is seal in English.
God was with him that day, unbelievable
Oh l'exploit !!! Le sang froid, ils ont été incroyable
2:27 the right engine quit on us... then 5 seconds later it shows the left engine without a trail and the right engine active
The trail is the fuel leak, not a contrail.
Yes, no commercial jet engine (Trent 700) would ever have a trail behind of the type, proving it must be of the fuel leakage
"WHAT THE FUCK?!"
French translation: "What is currently happening?" lmfao
Imfaooooo
Quelle bon pilot Robert Piché
Wow they managed to land safely!
hey we are gliding well guess we should cry now
i would cry when its going DOWN!!!!!
9:27 100 50 40 30 20 10 BUTTER
Blog it.
Heck it.
Frenchie Pilot got'er down on land but he bounced it down the freeway. That's much better than salt water, you got to admit.
"f r e e w a y"
A Hero in CANADA
Piché is bad ass 🦅🦅🦅💯
While this was an amazing job by the pilots, they were actually very lucky that their flight plan has changed before take off. Should they have sticked with the former flight plan, they would not make it to the airport. Another thing is that captain made a major mistake when he opened those fuel transfer valves LOL
@Tournel Henry THANK YOU
They followed the Airbus manual. They didn't know the leak was that bad.
To qualify the transfer of fuel from one engine to the other a "major mistake" is incorrect and too strong a statement. No explanation required... In addition, we now know that the Captain soon rectified this 'attempt' by reversing the transfer to what it was. Yes, there was luck...., but there was especially a tremendous experience (from countless severe weather conditions the Commandant had experienced) ; and, of course, the willpower and determination ('fueled' by adrenaline) of Commandant Piché. I write those lines as this accomplishment is celebrated this year (August 23, 2021) with a 50 minutes Documentary. I also would like to remind everyone that the entire flight as well as what Mr. Piché did that day is now taught and is one of the simulations at the CAE (in Montreal).
Wow that was hilarious. They made the captain act like a psychopath. And if you really want to howl with laughter turn on the closed captioning for english. Your welcome.
*Another happy landing*
Does the movie mentions how Piche was the one who caused the problem by ignoring the ECAM fuel imbalance warning disregarding them as "computer bugs" and made it worst opening the crossfeed valve (if he suspected a computer bug why he opened the valve like if it was a real problem?) ..
He alone converted what should have been a "lost one engine" emergency into a total loss of power emergency....in the middle of the Atlantic..
Exactly
Well, maybe.
But also nobody told him that the engine of the airplane was replaced with a new one, and that they used parts of the old one that were not compatible with the new engine.
In any case, what he did was pretty impressive.
Talote1983
Sorry.. i have tried to understand from his point of view.. but it doesnt make sense.. because it was simply logic.. logic that plus knownledge and experience is what a captain or any plane pilot must have.
first you get 2 warnings in engine 2 : high oil press and low oil temp (both are related).. but no big deal.. later you get a fuel imbalance warning indicating that there is LESS fuel in the right wing tanks ..wich are the ones that feed engine 2..
Stop there.. 2 engine warnings indicating oil is too cold and fuel imbalance in that very same tank? Even if you dont deduce fuel leak.. you have to acept something is going on in the right engine ..maybe its drinking more fuel.. maybe some pump fauilure.. but 3 separared events on engine 2? And then.. you decided it must be a computer bug.. in the middle of the Atlantic with 300 people on board..and then decide to treat the fuel imbalance as if it was real opening the crossfeed...and look at how fast the fuel drains up to the very end..
Sorry.. i fail to see any logic in continuing and disregarding those as computer bugs yet treating the worst of them as real but not believing its real...it all ended in the wors outcome: acelerated fuel leak and extend to all fuel tanks until you lose all power ..in the middle of the Atlantic with 300 people on board
Oh look, another TH-cam armchair pilot - with the benefit of a full transcript of the events - talking shit about those that were actually there. How impressed we are...
sparrowlt that's not how the events actually happened.
There's a documentary about it in NG about aerial disasters that shows you how the pilot came to that conclusion.
Wrong or not, he managed to land a jet plane with no engines.
Similar but wrong engines were replaced on this plane causing the fuel lines to chafe overtime and lose fuel midflight. It’s always better to have a former convicted drug runner pilot at the helm in cases like this who knows how to fly under duress.
Funny how the calmest people were the passengers and the pilots and flight attendant were screaming lol
Look mom! no engine! :D
😂😂😂😂
Wow bless the pilots
''Our intentions... c'est d'attérir, sacrament :| ''
Erm, can some one translate for me?
@@ThatOneguy-zn6hj "our intentions.. is to (f-word) land"
let's go gliding bitches!
Badass mode activated.
lol yeh how about a nice flight on a plane with no fule yeh I wanna burst my fucking tires I wanna glide this shit to make it crash lol yeh let's go gliding bitches said captain nunnut
Cpt Fifi says that Dan Chaney
9:28 OK, everyone just died. I know Air Transat 236 touched down fast and bounced, but not THAT hard and certainly not at 300 knots.
ikr thats so exaggerated xD
Yup definitely
In an interview, Piche said the plane bounced 30 feet into the air. When it touched down again, he applied all the brakes, knowing he would lose control if the plane bounced a second time.
wow ..exiting video
7 miles from final, 12,000 feet. Assuming that's nautical miles, that would give a glide angle of 3.54:1, or coming in at about 16 degrees angle. In a plane, that's a pretty steep glide - about how steep, maybe a little steeper than the Space Shuttle comes in. No way an airliner could come down that steep without flaps or spoilers, even with the gear down. Maybe not do another 360, but some S-turns would be a good idea. Or maybe put it into a sideslip - wonder why he didn't do that, that's what the pilot of the Gimli Glider did. This pilot, like the Gimli Glider pilot, was experienced with gliders (where they train using sideslips to come down quickly in situations like this), and this was after the Gimli Glider so he surely knew of that story and how that pilot slipped it in.
he was doing a bunch of S-turns after the 360 to lose energy according to real life. He still landed the plane hard to the point where it bounced.
He did do S turns, its just not showed in the movie
@@louistremblay1218 Ah, makes sense. This movie feels like it's more about the drama than what actually happened. Both this and the Gimli Glider landed very fast, had more energy than desired, but that's better that than having not enough. Both managed to stop before the end of the runway. I recall a flight instructor telling me to error on the too fast side, as it's better to hit something at the far end of the field at 10 knots than at the near end at 50 knots (thinking of a Cessna here).
Os meus sogros vinham neste voo, foi um susto.
they made mistakes but they also saved the lives of just over 300 people
This is incorrect. From Wikipedia:
"Piché executed one 360° turn, and then a series of "S" turns, to dissipate excess altitude.
At 06:45 UTC, the plane touched down hard, around 1,030 ft (310 m) past the threshold of runway 33, at a speed around 200 knots (370 km/h; 230 mph) [Typical landing speed, depending on weight, seems to be around 160 - 200 knots, but the fuel tanks were empty, so 140 - 170 knots would probably be closer.], bounced once, and then touched down again, roughly 2,800 ft (850 m) from the threshold. Maximum emergency braking was applied and retained, and the plane came to a stop after a landing run that consumed 7,600 ft (2,300 m) of the 10,000-foot (3,000 m) runway. Because the antiskid and brake modulation systems were inoperative,[a] the eight main wheels locked up, the tires abraded and fully deflated within 450 ft (140 m), and the wheels themselves were worn down to the axle journals during rollout.
Fourteen passengers and two crew members had minor injuries, while two passengers had serious injuries during the evacuation of the aircraft. The plane suffered structural damage to the main landing gear (from the hard touchdown and the abrasion of the locked wheels against the runway surface during the landing roll) and the lower fuselage (both structural deformation from the hard touchdown and various punctures from impact by pieces of debris shed from the main landing gear).
That plane makes an emergency landing
I like how a plane can still fly for long time with experienced pilots after no engines.
Like when someone turns the rotor off in a helicopter and landing with no engine power.
As opposed to what? Dropping like a rock?
@@9999AWC That would be just crashing :D
You absolutely cannot land a helicopter without its engines
@@camcherta yes you can google auto-rotation!
They could have made the scenery a bit more realistic.
They needed 9 millions but ended up with a 7 millions budget
Turn on Closed Captions at 7:42/43. Thank me later.
I bell at all?
When you talk foolish, she'll sit on it! LOL
the space shuttle . energy manegment
excelente video Bravo au pilot Piche
For the record I’m pretty sure that the passengers did not panic like that.
Yes they did, they were preparing for either down the ocean or crash on ground, either way it's gut churning.
@@Sacredloveoracle7 idk if it was all of them or not, cuz I don’t think that everyone would be panicking like that
@@Sacredloveoracle7 Most emergencies have passengers not panic like that. The scene in the movie was dramatized.
wow hw did it feel inside the plane
I'm French-American thus bilingual, I gotta say, the pilots accent is.. unique
Do you mean his accent when he speaks in English or French? Either one is very typical of a Quebecois accent though XD
He's from Quebec
@@9999AWC makes sense, thanks!
Shit now that was dramatic, that jumpee was high enough to break some bones and the tires doesn't explode at the touchdown like that '-'
It was a very hard landing
their is another film about air Transat flight 236 it's 51 minuets :D
dan chaney where?
team dimond The actual movie is 01h47min long
This is sad in 2020 even tho this happened in 2001
Why is everything so yellow-ish?
They all have Hepatitis
Baguette
Too much garlic
It’s in the morning
Many movies like to make everything look yellowish. Idk why they think it looks cool though.
8:02 bad physics. In a level turn, the force on the objects inside should be perpendicular to the longitudinal and lateral axes. The oxygen masks shouldn't move.
You do realize they are on people
+monito0207 the people shouldn't move either
I don't think it was exactly a coordinated turn... Steep turns in an A330 isn't exactly common...
miracle
Perfeito!
The Americans need to make this into a major movie. This is just ok. Good by Canadian standards.
En effet.
This is historical
The pilot almost like the pilot of gimli glider
GOD HELP ALL CREW MEMBER....
Ist so sad i Need to cry ;_;
They are flying like 2.000 knots
That’s the X-15 you’re saying, 200 is more reasonable
yall slightly over-dramaticised... slightly.
It's a movie. Everything is gonna be over dramatic to the point of annoyance.
@@CharlieND This is based on a true story wdym
@@0w3nn Bro i said this in like 6 months so i dont remember what i was thinking alr
a French film, a Canadian flight
waddoe It is actualy a French-Canadian film produce in Québec, it is indeed a Canadian flight.
Yay and in Quebec there are more Canadian french than Canadian Americans
Portuguese flight
heading 220 and 60 miles out and west of azores; maybe fl370
¡QUE LE SORT TE CONDAMNE...!
If they were 2 fast they should have opened the gear earlyer for drag.
I thoughj the same. Only in hindsight. There was muich more to consider at the time.
It’s better to be fast than to get smacked into the ocean because of some random shaking stick
hang on, that's a movie where air transat flight 236 was REALLY INVOLVED??!!
Who came here after listening to zemtv
Holy shit this movie is hilarious😂😂
9:25
The most ridiculous CGI I've seen yet. What were the producers thinking?
That's the main problem you have with this clip? Well OK, I'll tell you what they were thinking. They were thinking, either we find a way that this movie gets made with the budget we've been given, or it won't get made at all. That's called working within your constraints. What's less forgivable IMO is the depiction of the cockpit crew to the initial emergency. i understand they were going for emotional effect in trying to tie the passengers' experience to that of the pilots in charge, and placing that over a suitably morose soundtrack. That's all well and good, except no trained crew would act like these actors acted when faced with a situation of this magnitude. For starters, you certainly don't close your eyes for a few precious seconds. There's just no time to spare in deep contemplation of possible outcomes. Only well-rehearsed checklists and standard CRM skills would occupy any trained pilots' time from the start of an emergency to safe arrival the gate.
Listen to the CVR of UA 232. You likely won't find it in full, but the best source is a British show from the 90s called 'Black Box'. The portion of interest is where Capt. Al Haynes hears the lead FA approaching for guidance from the flight crew, and he says, "unlock that fucking door" as the hydraulic quantity alarms are going off. They are deep into diagnostics in hopes of learning how best they can steer their plane from differential thrust alone. That's not the only example, but it's probably the most accessible one I can think of.
Aside from TRON: Legacy, there weren't that many films with good CGI in 2010. This is also a low-budget movie, and the CGI is perfectly adequate.
@@9999AWC True. Of all the things they could've done better with a bigger budget/more time, the CGI bothered me the least. With the same limited resources, if only they had consulted some actual pilots, and instead showed a kids' cartoon animation of the plane crashing, I wouldn't have been so taken out of the moment, because I know that no trained pilot would act the way those two actors did. Maybe they were trying to give a sense of time standing still for the general audience, but this just doesn't happen. There's simply too much to be done, and done fast.
Watch the CGI of Babylon 5 😂
What a load of crap. It was the traffic controller who guidded the aicraft to a safe landing. If it wasnt for him, they would've ditched.
Why didnt it show thee ram air turbine? people will be confused as to why the pilots had some instruments displayed. Also why didn't they deploy the landing gear earlier, that would have create much more drag and go them to a lower altitude.
They didn't deploy the gears earlier because they were too fast. Had they done so, the gears would've ripped off...
No Hydraulics? Yeah sure. And how did he control the Aircraft without it? They at least could`ve included the RAT (Ram Air Turbine). Because in the real event, they deployed it to get some hydraulics and electrical systems back.
BlackFoxFalcon that part is missing but they had an emergency system who gave them the minimum to power the hydrolic system.
Damn Frenchies ran out of gas...and are now gliding. That's not good! At least that Fing Violin supposed music has stopped...
They are absolutely not frenchies . They are francophone canadians . Again you are one of those countless anglophones unable to make the difference between french and francophone . Go reading books .
Does anybody have a friggin English version?!
Apprenez le français 😁
C-GITS is retired.
Did all passengers take's the life vest?
yes, in case they din't make it and must ditch to water/sea
Is this movie for sale on DVD?
9:41 WHAT THE FUCK
Whos here from Bright Side?
Nobody
warum hinterlässt der rechte Motor einen Kondensstreifen obwohl er ausgefallen ist?
hai
Könnte der ausfliessende Treibstoff aus dwm Leck sein
Who came here from BRIGHT SIDE.
MOVIE LINK PLEASE
Too steep and too fast; no hydraulics and no speed brakes; landing gear brakes dialled in at 100% which is why all main bogey tires burst within seconds of touching down. Lajes is a military base. It sits high on an island. At the end of the runway is a steep cliff overlooking the ocean. There’s no go-arounds for these people
The burst tires probably would be what ended up stopping the plane
Movie name?
Hmmm thought its a netflix series
Wasn't it night time
Early in the morning 5am-7am
Shows how bad my landings are in x plane
1:53
Guau
They touched the ground at 190 knots and its fast a lot too fast
which it was in english
Which or wish ?
The other pilot knew French?
whats the title
Name song?
Use the RAT at least
9:10
You kidding? I can land harder than that!
Ryanair: pffffft
ryanair: ахахахахахахха ты серьезно 6ля ты понимаешь что я умнее и сильнее тебя а)