Brides learn their families don’t support their relationship.
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.ค. 2024
- #bride #bridetobe #bridal #engaged #wedding #weddingplanner #weddingcontent #weddingtiktok #weddingday #weddingdress #weddingtok #bridetok #brideandgroom #weddingvibes #weddingplanning #weddingcontentcreator
I'm sad for them. You can't choose your blood relatives, but you can choose your true family, blood or not, who love and support you.
This is so heartbreaking and disgusting! For both families to lead them on for 7 years letting them think they have support only to show just what their beliefs really are.
Please do at least a part 2!
I hope this turns into a collaboration with “Stand In Pride” where friendly folks stand in for weddings, graduations, and other special occasions for families that choose not to participate. I’m the mother of a gay man, and I would LOVE if he and his partner would make it official. But moms have to be patient 😊
I have never heard of this organisation before. It's a fantastic idea 💡 giving support and strength to those who may need it the most.🎉
And these family members are jerks if they said they support these two and then RSVP no because they really don’t support these two. That’s not acceptance.
So sad 😞. I’m glad they’re staying positive. I at least hope some friends come or something. Part 2 please. This is too sad to leave like this.
How sad that they have so many fearful people in their lives. People who don’t see love. Makes you wonder what the man who told us to love one another would think. What about it Jesus?
Those tossing around their morals as an excuse not to attend or participate in their wedding is so hypocritical. To have socialized with them, invited them to holiday gatherings, broke bread with them, smiled at them, said to their faces how supportive they are of the relationship, etc., for 7 years only to suddenly use the word 'morals' is laughable. Those 7 years, their relatives have been deceiving, lying, betraying, gossiping, slandering these women because of their relationship behind the women's backs, leading them to believe they (and their relationship) are loved, valued and respected, only to find those very family members are the biggest hypocrites in the world. A moral compass isn't something you pull out of thin air when you want it to work for you to get you out of an awkward situation (perceived or real), or so others don't witness you being a fraud (the uncle doesn't want anyone to see him being a charlatan when he walks her down the aisle because those who know his past support of their relationship was all a lie will see him being a fraud if he walks her down the aisle, and those whom he's convinced that he's morally sound will see him as a fraud if he walks her down the aisle. Either way, he'll be seen as a fraud - which is exactly who he is (not to mention being a coward as well). A moral compass is a virtuous belief system by which you live every moment of every day as a guide for appropriate behavior toward others. This 'uncle' isn't worthy to be given the honor of walking her down the aisle to her waiting partner: he doesn't deserve to even attend their ceremony now that his true self has been exposed. And now that she's getting married to her long time partner, I hope the special place she's always kept this uncle in her heart and in her life, out of respect to her late father, is a place where she closes the door and doesn't look back.
Is this wedding going to be a religious ceremony held in a church? If so, the couple should respect their family's beliefs and them not being willing to participate in a ceremony which is against the said beliefs. Not so sure about the cousins who said they couldn't wait for the couple to tie the knot and then backtracked when it came to the crunch. A bit hypocritical or they have been influenced by other family members. Each to his own and the couple should not let it affect their big day. No doubt they will be surrounded by friends/family who fully support ther choice.
There is a difference between respecting someone's private choices and being a witness or an active support in a marriage you are morally against. One you tollorate because you love the person and their private life is their business. the other is standing in front of God asking his blessing and support on a relationship that Christians believe he opposes.
Some* Christians. Not all. Not even most, in this country.
@kimberlyberner719
And do you know why they have this belief? Willful misinterpretation of passages that weren't even correctly translated from Hebrew, something that a deep believer who seeks more teachings would learn. There's significant documentation from reliable historical sources that even King James himself was in a known and very long standing relationship with a man. Did some in his court not like that? Sure. But they never moved against him or his partner because of it. If the man who ordered a new translation of the holy texts was not condemned and erased from Christian history because he was gay, do you not think that may have been because people weren't so stupid as to believe the hate filled ramblings that came from the US Southern churches, especially the Southern Baptists? Christians who do not educate themselves are not good disciples for they are easily led to hateful, unchristian behavior and beliefs. Both current extremists and WWII are examples of this extreme thinking being rooted in ignorance.
These women are trying to redefine marriage. If their families loved them, they would tell them that living in an unnatural relationship is sinning against God and is bringing judgement against our society by all who condone it.
Marriage has both a civil and a religious aspect, the religious aspect being *optional*. The piece of paper issued by the government is valid whether the ceremony is overseen by a rabbi, an imam, a priest, a Buddhist monk, a nondenominational officiant, or a county clerk.
Let he who has not sinned, let him cast the first stone.
@Shelb13v Ah yes, another discipline of hate doctrine that turns away from the ancient texts of the early followers of Christ. It's such a shame that such supposedly "devout" people never research the history of when the church began to preach against homosexuality, how it started with a bad translation that could then be twisted to be a message of hate against gay men when in reality it was a message of not tolerating rape of an angel, but a full willingness to hand over a daughter as payment to the victims, regardless of the willingness of the daughters. Also, the ability to ignore or remain ignorant on the history of King James having a male lover for decades that was a known relationship is mind boggling.
There's so much research and so many scholars who have worked to improve the incorrect translations of the past. But hateful people, those that hold so much hate in their heart it's hard to imagine they leave any space for the love of Christ to try to get through. These so-called "devout Christians" that spend more time and energy in hateful, shameful activities and rants against good people that Christ would recognize as true believers and disciples because of their actions and the love they choose to hold that does not leave space for hatred. It's sad, because I have no doubt the shock that they'll experience upon passing will lead to begging for a second chance. I only hope that the severity of their punishment is equal to the suffering they caused while on earth.