There is One God, the Father Alone - Pastor Mark A. Jones

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 149

  • @Monsy77
    @Monsy77 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ✨ Hallelujah. Glory to GOD !!✨

  • @JoseTarrayo-m7t
    @JoseTarrayo-m7t 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    For I am God, and there is no other. Period...

  • @djparsons7363
    @djparsons7363 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Finally, someone who understands the truth, Jesus is NOT God!

  • @MrZeuqsav
    @MrZeuqsav 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    @Isaiah,62:1-3, The universal New name of God is Jehovah, and his people, the spiritual Jerusalem will be called by his own name, so, the Jw's, org, is the fulfillment of this prophecies, which Jesus also teach us to hallowed his name, @Ex, 9:16/Romans, 9:17,

    • @metsamanvibration6329
      @metsamanvibration6329 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Jesus is not an angel. He is human.

    • @smalltimer4370
      @smalltimer4370 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@metsamanvibration6329
      Interesting wording; angel = messenger
      What's interesting about it, is that an angel, need not be a messenger.
      And moreso, that people tend to associated GOD's heavenly sons as 'angels', and in contrast with scripture, which appears to differentiate between the two
      Is Jesus an angel?
      We suppose He could be, if He was a spirit being, sent by GOD, as a messenger.
      Though I do not believe there are any scriptures or Bible passages stating such things.
      And in contrast with the resurrected Jesus who is now in heaven, of whom we would conclude to be a spirit in heaven alongside His Father.

    • @metsamanvibration6329
      @metsamanvibration6329 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@smalltimer4370 An Angel is a non human. Jesus was human. And a mediator. 1Tim 2:5
      For there is one God and one mediator between God and humanity, Messiah Jesus, himself human

    • @smalltimer4370
      @smalltimer4370 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@metsamanvibration6329
      Yes, Jesus was human on earth - though He is clearly not human in heaven at this time, nor would we conclude that He was human prior-to His coming to earth.

    • @metsamanvibration6329
      @metsamanvibration6329 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@smalltimer4370 I believe he is born of a Virgin. Not pre-existing before his own birth. (Which would make him a non-human) I believe he is the first resurrected human by his Father, now exhalted to sit at the right hand side of God, now in spirit form. To come back very soon (hopefully). Jesus was Gods plan all the time.

  • @WWJDCommunications
    @WWJDCommunications 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can someone help with the people that say Jesus is God backed by John1:1 “in the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God. Followed by John 1:14 “And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father full of grace and truth?”

    • @SmalltimR
      @SmalltimR 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's quite simple actually - the word in John, is a title used to relate to GOD's spoken commandment made-alive by means of the son.
      We can see this in the Old Testament, and as we read of the word by which all things are made, is identified as coming from YHWH(see; His mouth), and then commanded to GOD's will.
      And so in returning to John, the biggest issue for many people today, is that they are not reading the passage with that understanding of the title, in-that it relates to GOD's spoken will and commandment made alive in the son - see; through and for Him
      The word = GOD's living commandment
      The word = GOD

    • @WWJDCommunications
      @WWJDCommunications 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SmalltimR I really appreciate your response and this isn’t me being disrespectful but is that your own opinion on the matter or the commonly held opinion amongst Unitarians?

    • @SmalltimR
      @SmalltimR 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@WWJDCommunications
      As outlined in the initial comment, this interpretation follow the details provided in scripture in matters - ie, the word of GOD, by which all things were made(Psalm 33.6-9, Heb 11.3), and who is then commanded by GOD(Isaiah 55.11, Heb 11.3), would later be revealed as the Son(Ro 11.36, Col 1.16, John 1.3, John 1.10) - thereby concluding the title, to be what is now referred-to as a personification of GOD's GOD's spoken will and commandment, carried-out or accomplished by means of the son.
      As for Unitarianism, I cannot say, as my testimony is to the written truth of GOD, and so, I would encourage that you consider the aforementioned passages, as well as taking this in prayer to GOD for direction - GOD bless and take care

    • @WWJDCommunications
      @WWJDCommunications 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SmalltimR definitely will. It’s been a big one to me. Very cool of you to take the time here!

    • @pmac_
      @pmac_ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      1. There is a simple explanation of John 1:1. John was writing to a Jewish audience. We should not take the Greek meaning for "word" (logos - λογος), but a Jewish one. For Jews "the word" was "the *spoken* word". In the beginning was the *spoken* word ("and God said"), and the *spoken* word was with (toward - προς) God and the word was God *speaking* . The Greek "toward" reminds us that when God speaks, it is like a boomerang, coming back toward him in glory, ("and it was so"), fulfilling that to which it is sent (read Isaiah 55:8-11).
      John was not writing a proof text for Trinitarians. He was writing to show that when God speaks, stuff happens. Without it, there is no substance. "Man does not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the *mouth* of God".
      2. Re John 1:14;
      "And the (spoken) word was made flesh, and dwelt among us".
      Q. Who dwelt among us?
      A. (a) the spoken word
      (b) the flesh (Jesus).
      In other words Jesus came speaking God's words:
      "Then said Jesus unto them, When ye have lifted up the Son of man, then shall ye know that I am *he* (the *Messiah* - the son OF God), and that *I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath *taught me, I speak these things* . And he that sent me is with me: the Father hath not left me alone; *for I do always those things that please him* " (John 8: 28-29),
      and:
      " *God* , who little by little and in many ways spoke in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, *has* in these last days *spoken* unto us *by his Son* (Heb1:1).
      It's all about the spoken word of God, first by God through the prophets and then through the prophet "like unto Moses", Jesus himself, God's only son.

  • @chuymiranda453
    @chuymiranda453 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don’t believe Jesus ever says the name Yahweh in the New Testament.

    • @SmalltimR
      @SmalltimR 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As Jesus upheld the law and cowered for no one - it would be unthinkable that He would ever refrain from citing the divine name from written scripture in His ministry.
      That said, and equally notable, is that Jesus would refer to His Father by name outside of sacred service, and in-much the same way we would not refer-to our own fathers by name when speaking to others - hens why Jesus almost always referenced His GOD and Father as, my Father, rather than YHWH.

    • @Zipfreer
      @Zipfreer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Because they removed the Sons & father's names from the text, it is restored in My Hebrew bible where the lord and LORD is where Yahweh / Yahshua should be!

    • @TheCrucifixFishTestifies
      @TheCrucifixFishTestifies 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When you know Messiah’s Hebrew name, Yahshua, you can see that he did in fact proclaim his Father’s name in the contracted form of “Yah”. We see this in John 17:11-12:
      “I am no longer going to be in the world; and yet they themselves are in the world, and I am coming to You. Holy Father, keep them in Your name, the name which You have given Me, so that they may be one just as We are. While I was with them, I was keeping them in Your name, which You have given Me….”
      Many of Yahweh’s prophets that spoke for Him had His contracted name contained within their names. This truth has been lost because of transliterations of names. When you understand the importance of names in the scriptures it also helps reveal Messiah’s humanity.
      Yahshua also said, "I have come in my Father's name." John 5:43
      Yahshua's name means "Yah is salvation". Messiah's name directs us to the Father by the meaning of his name.

    • @Zipfreer
      @Zipfreer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@TheCrucifixFishTestifies Christianity did not destroy gnostic paganism; it adopted it." God in Flesh and 3 tri god are all pagan concepts and are not scriptural

    • @MrZeuqsav
      @MrZeuqsav 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chuymiranda453 Jesus did not mentioned the new name of God Jehovah because in his time the prophecized new universal name and his new Jerusalem which will be called by his new name was not yet formed, @Isaiah, 62:1-3/Romans, 2:28-29,

  • @emirbugratitiz
    @emirbugratitiz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Disliked 🔥🔥🔥 Christ is Lord 🔥🔥🔥🔥 L unitarian post

  • @hubertlancaster
    @hubertlancaster 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We read this in, Isaiah 43:10 Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me. Isaiah 43:11 I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no saviour. The one that is speaking in Isaiah is Jesus Christ. I say that because first off, Jesus Christ is our Saviour, secondly in the book of hebrews we read this, Hebrews 1:6 And again, when he bringeth in the firstbegotten into the world, he saith, And let all the angels of God worship him. Heb 1:7 And of the angels he saith, Who maketh his angels spirits, and his ministers a flame of fire. Heb 1:8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom. We can conclude from this that the Father made Jesus Christ our God from the beginning and if you don't understand that then you don't have the revelaation of who your God is. All Creation is ascribed to the Son of God. John says this in, Joh 1:3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. all things were made by Jesus Christ Him and for Him. Jesus Christ is the Heir of all things, He is the God of the Old Testament and the God of the New Testament.

    • @Et_2_Brute
      @Et_2_Brute 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If you read your Bible you will know that Jesus was not worship as God nor was he worship as the Creator. Revelation 4& 5

    • @aaronsanchez3141
      @aaronsanchez3141 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Jesus is not alive in the Old Testament, so it's clearly not the future messiah. GOD is speaking

    • @Et_2_Brute
      @Et_2_Brute 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aaronsanchez3141they also say Jesus appear to Moses

    • @aaronsanchez3141
      @aaronsanchez3141 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Et_2_Brutethey say a lot of crap.

    • @SmalltimR
      @SmalltimR 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The one speaking in Isaiah, is the one who sent Jesus to save us
      That said, and quite obviously, you do not know scripture, and are now left tending to false teaching rather than the written truth.
      Jesus said it over and over again - but the people would not listen;
      I was sent
      I have not come of my own-self
      My words are not my own; they belong to the Father who sent me
      Believe in GOD, believe also in me
      Likewise, the scriptures also show that Jesus was made our saviour by His Father - iow, He is YHWH's salvation.
      Though here again, and as you do not know scripture, you are left tending to false teachings and lies rather than the truth.

  • @euston2216
    @euston2216 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There is one God, the Father alone. And this one God - the Father - is *love.* And the greatest demonstration of *love* is to lay down one's _own_ life for others. So the one God, who exists eternally _outside of_ time, expressed _himself_ in genuine human form - as _his own_ Son - _within_ time, and laid down _his own_ life for us.

    And the _name_ of the one God - the Father alone - who made _himself_ a Son to _himself,_ and who laid down _his own_ life for us (self sacrifice), and who shed _his own_ blood on the cross, and who raised _himself_ from the dead - is revealed to be name which is above every name: *JESUS.*

    • @Zipfreer
      @Zipfreer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The world absolutely cannot tolerate a doctrine that says Yahushua is a fully human Messiah, originating in his mother, as the Bible teaches. It goes against the very premise that supports the establishment of the Babylonian mystery school systems of this age. Yahuwah's kingdom will be established on earth at the end of this present age by Yahushua of Nazareth, who is the Son of Yahuwah through the miraculous conception of 2 Samuel 7 - God's Promise to David proves his not God but a human Messiah given the Fathers Holy Spirit (Luke 1:35), and who is therefore the prophesied human Messiah now glorified at Yahuwah’s right hand (Psalm 110:1; 1 Tim. 2:5).

    • @loveofthetruth9398
      @loveofthetruth9398 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      This explanation is a sad attempt to blend snatches of Scripture with totally Pagan notions and concepts.
      There are ZERO Scriptures that state God "exists eternally outside of time". That is pure speculation.
      There are ZERO Scriptures that state that God "expressed himself in genuine human form".
      There are MANY Scriptures that state that Jesus was a sacrifice TOO God (his God and our God).
      There are MANY Scriptures that state the FATHER raised the Son, and even a couple that state Christ's GOD raised Jesus from the dead (Eph 1:17-20 and 1 Peter 1:3).

    • @Zipfreer
      @Zipfreer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@loveofthetruth9398 Yes the person is a lost man a gnostic and a follower of pagan theology as scripture is very clear to distinguish between the Father and the Son all Things are given to Messiah from the Father this includes the gift of the second life as the Father rises his human son

    • @euston2216
      @euston2216 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The self-sacrificial love of the Father is not a pagan concept. It's what the gospel is all about.

      1 JOHN 3:16 (KJV)
      Hereby perceive we *the love of God,* because *he laid down his life for us:* and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren.

      The self-sacrificial love of the Father is a love that the false God of -Biblical- Unitarianism does not possess.

    • @Zipfreer
      @Zipfreer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@euston2216 God isn’t going to sacrifice himself for man’s sins as God in the flesh is a pagan concept not scriptural

  • @kardiognostesministries8150
    @kardiognostesministries8150 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What is often ascribed to God "alone" in the Bible is used in reference to Jesus. How one can be a Unitarian in light of this fact is really absurd.

    • @chabirajpersaud9647
      @chabirajpersaud9647 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Alone means alone regards of the individual! Jesus alone heals through the power of God s spirit! God alone created the heavens and the Earth in the beginning.....😊😊😊

    • @kardiognostesministries8150
      @kardiognostesministries8150 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@chabirajpersaud9647 Does God alone fully know the hearts of all people (1 Kings 8:39)?

    • @loveofthetruth9398
      @loveofthetruth9398 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@kardiognostesministries8150 That WAS true centuries before Jesus came into existence. Once Jesus "came forth unto me (YHVY)" in Bethlehem Micah 5:2, AND then "increased in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and man" Luke 2:52, AND then was baptized, ..... THEN ..... YHVH God anointed Jesus as The Christ, and GAVE him the "spirit without measure" .... AT THAT POINT Jesus could ALSO know the hearts of people.

    • @kardiognostesministries8150
      @kardiognostesministries8150 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@loveofthetruth9398 So that's one example where the use of "alone" being applied to God is used in reference to Jesus.
      Next...
      All sins are ultimately committed against God "alone" (Psalm 51:4). The same applies in reference to Jesus (1 Corinthians 8:12).

    • @animatednostalgia5034
      @animatednostalgia5034 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@kardiognostesministries8150All you have are hints and riddles. You don't have a clear teaching of a Triune god anywhere in scripture. So many things are clearly taught in scripture, but Modalism and Trinitarianism never are.