CNC Hand programming final

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 180

  • @muellermaxwell
    @muellermaxwell 9 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    the entire time i watched this video i thought it was a cnc crash video so i was just waiting for the crash to happen and it never did.. felt like i was gonna have an anxiety attack lol

    • @christianlewis7055
      @christianlewis7055 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I knew I couldn't be the only one that read "fail" not "final".

  • @depenthene
    @depenthene 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Rather interesting piece as final. We did external turning, external grooving, external threading, center drilling, internal turning, internal grooving, internal threading, milling with C-axis. That covers pretty much most operations needed in normal workshop.

  • @kruzihbv
    @kruzihbv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hope you've grown out of those feeds!
    I only program in metric but here goes (guessed sizes, assuming a 50mm bar)
    G21 G40 G96 G96
    G92 S2200
    G00 X380. Z300. T0100
    T0101 G96 S150 M03
    X56. Z2. M08
    G72 W1. R0.5
    G72 P100 Q200 U0. W0.2 F0.3
    N100 GOO Z0.
    N200 GO1 X-0.8
    GOO X50. Z3.
    G71 U2. R0.5
    G71 P300 Q400 U0.5 W0.1 F0.3
    N300 G00 X30.
    G01 Z-20. R3.
    X40. C2.
    Z-60.
    X45. (NEEDS AN R TO DEBURR!)
    Z-97.5
    N400 X50. Z-100.
    G00 X32. Z0.5
    G72 W1. R0.5
    G72 P500 Q600 U0.5 W0.1 F0.3
    N500 G00 Z-15.
    G01 X30.
    G02 X0. Z0. R15.
    N600 G01 Z0.5
    G00 X380. Z300. T0200
    T0202 G96 S200 M03
    G00 X46. Z0. M08
    Z--65.
    G71 U1.5 R0.5
    G71 P700 Q800 U0.5 W0. F0.15
    N700 G01 X45.1 W0.
    A200. X35.
    Z-80. R4.
    N800 X46.
    G00 X50. Z0.
    X30.
    G42
    G01 Z-20. R3. F0.1
    X40. C2.
    Z-60.
    X45.
    Z-65.
    A200. X35.
    Z-80. R4.
    X45.
    Z-97.5
    X50. Z-100.
    X60.
    G40
    G00 Z0.5
    X32.
    G41
    G70 P500 Q600 F0.1
    G40
    G00 X380 Z300. T0300
    T0303 G96 S180 M03
    G00 X50. Z0. M08
    Z-60.
    G01 X36.1 F0.08
    X42. F0.2
    G00 Z-58.
    G01 X36. F0.15
    Z-60.
    G00 X50. Z-59.
    G00 X380. Z300. T0400
    T0404 G97 S400 M03
    X42. Z-15. M08
    G76 P020060 Q100 R0.02
    G76 X36.32 Z-59. R0. P1840 Q400 F3.
    G00 X380. Z300. TO0100
    M30
    I should get a go pro for work :)
    Edit cause i forgot to run a finishing cycle on the radius on the front :)

  • @Neurotripsicks
    @Neurotripsicks 5 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Slower RPM. Here's a tip. When you see sparks that means the insert is rounded due to higher speeds for that diameter of shifting.

    • @drakon1300
      @drakon1300 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      most definitely too high of rpm.. the sparks flying show your burning up the insert..

  • @BomenJager
    @BomenJager 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    1:58 it enters really hard

    • @CampfireCrucifix
      @CampfireCrucifix 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I just feel like they can't make up their mind 2:26

  • @EternitP8
    @EternitP8 9 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    I would go slower on the feed and speed and take deeper cuts instead

    • @Panzax1
      @Panzax1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Agree. As deep a cut as the part can handle first, then increase the feed as much as possible. The speed is what wears out inserts. Deeper cuts increases wear very little, increased feed increases wear a little more.

    • @tomislavmijatovic9369
      @tomislavmijatovic9369 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Panzax1dečije pesme,

    • @lalei1898
      @lalei1898 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tomislavmijatovic9369 braca ako imas sta da kazes moras na engleskom,mislim da te ne razumeju

    • @MF175mp
      @MF175mp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tomislavmijatovic9369 deep cut slow feed technique brings too much heat to parts. I would take first 0,4mm per rev feed (with 0,8 TNR, more with bigger TNR) and then see how deep it could go

  • @imjustsaiyan58
    @imjustsaiyan58 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Clean finish but you can take bigger cuts on each pass to save time with that carbide insert

  • @Jszyndlar-CNC_Krok_po_Kroku
    @Jszyndlar-CNC_Krok_po_Kroku 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Why using chamfer out in threading cycle when U have groove? 2 high Vc, 2 low Ap, second finish pass only made finish worse.
    Still not bad

  • @middlemanclayton1
    @middlemanclayton1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    poor lathe :( take deeper cuts and slow the feed rate

  • @Sketch1994
    @Sketch1994 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I think the people who talk about light cuts see too many train machining vids...This was a great combination of depth of cut and feed rate, providing great chip control, which can be harder when you go for deeper cuts and can always jump at you if the insert goes (a safe starting point for machines with limited power is 1-2 times the insert nose radius). The only thing I don't like is the spring passes, which although won't hurt too much on the leaded steel, but can really cause problems at the edge, especially without strictly sharp finishing insert geometries.

  • @r3ggi3nald
    @r3ggi3nald 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Feed is too high, cutting edge will wear off faster

  • @ktmpasser
    @ktmpasser 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nicely done. Having the second finish pass that essentially takes nothing is sometimes the result of how the controller reads the G71 X values. If you adjust the starting X point or the U value in the canned cycle you can eliminate the extra pass. It really makes no difference with one part but if you were making a large qty. run it saves a lot of time.

    • @MF175mp
      @MF175mp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      A G71 type 2 will always take an empty cut from what I've seen. It might be meant to cut the edges out that type 1 leaves but type 2 finishes those after each cut so the cleanup pass cuts air. Could save a little time by using type 1 when possible so it doesn't clean them up twice

    • @MF175mp
      @MF175mp ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SURASSUH I have since learned that the "empty" pass is an intermediate finish pass, you can program it so that it actually cuts material on that pass as well.

  • @joshcash7394
    @joshcash7394 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good video, not sure why you faced the ball instead of turning it. With that much material hanging out of the Chuck. Turn the round parts off where you can. Sideload leads to a lot of dimensional problems, when you need to hold tolerances.

  • @solgam
    @solgam 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Some moves were unnecessary, and that second finishing cut would have worked better on the surface if taken a bit deeper. At the end of the day it seemed to compensate cones and could improve measurement. If that threading tool exited the material before slanting up then its also fine. At 2:00 however it is clear why your school restricts depth of cut - any deeper and that G0 enter would cause issues. If that piece passed measuring and I had like 10 or less of those to do I would not waste time hand programming it in a different way.

    • @drakon1300
      @drakon1300 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes that X rapid into part at 2:00 could cause a problem ...

  • @Studio_Earth
    @Studio_Earth 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can'd Cycles!
    Nice looking part.

  • @gomitch2
    @gomitch2 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What will it be used for? What type of part is this?

  • @kisspeteristvan
    @kisspeteristvan 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    so , did you wrote the raw g code in notepad ?

  • @ryaneick8864
    @ryaneick8864 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    new insert slower rpm higher feed rate! haas st30?

  • @simonstott1067
    @simonstott1067 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    G76 P020060 why you angle on exit of thread?

  • @sergiovw1500
    @sergiovw1500 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    g50 s3500
    g96 s450 m03
    that happens because g96 is too high
    where is the coolant and lube?

    • @hdjm3835
      @hdjm3835 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      M08 y m09

  • @maastona
    @maastona 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do you happen to have the code & pic somewhere? If it's not inappropriate or even illegal to upload, I'd much apprecaite it. I need examples. If you can't deliver, I understand :)

  • @s6xfy
    @s6xfy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    AGAIN TH-cam? AFTER 4 YEARS U RECOMAND ME THIS? FUUUUUUUUUK

    • @pancho8708
      @pancho8708 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      5 yrs later...

  • @ulrichherrmann6787
    @ulrichherrmann6787 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Warum benutzt Du beim Schruppen nicht die ganze Wendeplatte?
    zumindest die ersten 4 oder 5 mm ?
    Dann noch V-konstant dazu ... und das Teil ist in weniger als 2 Minuten fertig!
    Why do not you use the entire insert when roughing?
    at least the first 4 or 5 mm?
    Then V-constant ... and the part is done in less than 2 minutes!

    • @Worik123
      @Worik123 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ja auch einige unnötige Schritte. Die Halbkugel könnte man im längsschruppzyklus mitschruppen und beim Schlichten von unten rechts bis oben links in einem Durchzug verfahren . Und Vc runter und stadessen mehr ap. Dann kann man sicher Kaffe holen ohne Angst zu haben, dass die schruppplatte abraucht..

  • @altondr
    @altondr 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    curious to see the whole program and what software was used.

    • @MF175mp
      @MF175mp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It was probably hand written utilizing G71, G72, G70, you don't need CAM programs for lathes that have the canned cycles available

  • @mikemai8568
    @mikemai8568 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He has learned the lesson.

  • @drakon1300
    @drakon1300 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    my suggestion for you is to turn the part from the front to back and do not face/back turn the radius on the front of the part. the radius could be turned easier and quicker by doing it all in one direction as an od turn.
    ref. X (dia + .02) z.1
    G71 repetitive cycle G0 x; G1Z0; G3 X Z R; G2 X Z R; G1 X; G3 X Z R; G1 Z; X; Z; X Z;

  •  8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    That's some mesmerizing shit right there! Especially at 2:33.

  • @allamericanbully2611
    @allamericanbully2611 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I am a lathe guy myself but all of the shops I've worked in have all had Okuma lathes and mills

    • @joshcash7394
      @joshcash7394 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Okuma are work horses. They repeat and keep repeating. I have nothing bad to say about okuma. Except they have a weird language. I cut my chops on okuma. One of the best in the business.

  • @danmclean2899
    @danmclean2899 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What machine were you using?

  • @naveedbepari3950
    @naveedbepari3950 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You can share the program plz

  • @forqueenandcountry3087
    @forqueenandcountry3087 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What was happening with the threading cycle at the end of the thread it seemed to jump before it reached the under cut.then dipped down into the under cut.

    • @ivan_jenkac
      @ivan_jenkac 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      wrong height in the thread program or the output angle in the machine settings should be changed

  • @Rohitkumar-md9ff
    @Rohitkumar-md9ff 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    give some coolant on cutting bit .pay mercy on bit

  • @userwl2850
    @userwl2850 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Brilliant job. I'm not keen on 3 jaws with a high feed rate but these tiny cuts are quite safe 👏🏻👍

    • @drakon1300
      @drakon1300 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      it depends on the machine and set up... I ran pony rods for frac pumps , mori sl45 3 jaw . clamped on 11" dia 3/4 depth on jaws parts 18" or so long.. used tailstock/center..
      ran about .315 depth of cut to the side at .021 feed per rev. the flange area was 7/8 wide was the reason for clamping on 3/4" ...11" down to about 3.5" on dia.
      cycle time was under 15 minutes... guy running them before me only took .08 to the side and the cycle time was like 50 minutes...

  • @anilbabu357
    @anilbabu357 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can u tell me the rpm and feed and depth of cut for using

    • @ehess1492
      @ehess1492 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Too much and not enough.

  • @joseabraham396
    @joseabraham396 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    decrease the feed speed man and keep away from resonance frequency !

  • @CSahilVaidya
    @CSahilVaidya 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How much rpm ?

  • @prosperoantoniohenaorestre5333
    @prosperoantoniohenaorestre5333 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Menos avance de corte. El avance longitudinal, desgasta más la punta de tungsteno, que la velocidad circunferencial. Yo diría que utilices más profundidad de corte, misma velocidad del husillo, y menos avance longitudinal.

  • @jurajokasa834
    @jurajokasa834 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Good job but cooling fluids missing!

    • @jurajokasa834
      @jurajokasa834 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Especially not cooling VBMT inserts! Crime!

  • @haseebahmedakabeeb
    @haseebahmedakabeeb 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this Swiss lathe?

  • @xinkelao7662
    @xinkelao7662 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    im not see any coolant on there.

  • @youyouhfd
    @youyouhfd 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    why u use a vbmt 04 for 2 operations u can use a vbmt 08 and then you can finish with your tools and why u repass the finition tool that make the finish worst ans how about your groove finish you almost forget it and you have to chek your vc i found it too high

    • @dth91
      @dth91 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      makes it worst eh

  • @joseangelhernandezsilva6683
    @joseangelhernandezsilva6683 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tengo un cnc y me marca falla en los servidores y k puede ser?

  • @IAmStillNotMatthew
    @IAmStillNotMatthew 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We made a similiar piece out of aluminium, only it was half of the size of this.

  • @joblessalex
    @joblessalex 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    so.. wazzit do?

  • @thedude5869
    @thedude5869 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A for effort D for execution

  • @洪素鶴-t2u
    @洪素鶴-t2u 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    讚,看他的鉄削知道她的刀具讚分享

  • @robchatc
    @robchatc 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you are taking 2 finishing cuts leave the last cut with something to do.

  • @pindbulandpur4135
    @pindbulandpur4135 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super program 👏

  • @85CEKR
    @85CEKR 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm not sure what to say about this, i'm thinking that this is they way you were thought to cut a part on a lathe.... Very wrong.... But in the other hand if you programed this by hand I would hire you... I'd spend some time teaching you how to efficiently cut a part bit you clearly know what your doing.

  • @Elfiak00
    @Elfiak00 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Étonnant de prendre la passe par en haut !

  • @pharaun159
    @pharaun159 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Those are some pretty shallow cuts a a really high speed.. Read up on your insert geometry.

  • @fernandoalfonzo5681
    @fernandoalfonzo5681 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Capo mi profe fantone

  • @MESINCNCChannel
    @MESINCNCChannel 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing bro

  • @rotating-alfadiq
    @rotating-alfadiq 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing trik

  • @Vaibhav_9150
    @Vaibhav_9150 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    G96 is my favourite

  • @sezdikuzukuzu6262
    @sezdikuzukuzu6262 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Butun takimlarin talasi az devri ilerleme hizi hizli oldugu icin elmmas ucu yanio

  • @pm7728
    @pm7728 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    2.03 g00 into workpiece xD

    • @kamil6558
      @kamil6558 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Terrible

  • @cncmacrosteps2756
    @cncmacrosteps2756 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hai bro video quality or sound super and Machine Programming man super and this components using work bro ?

  • @phamtrung4059
    @phamtrung4059 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    CNC hay quá 👍🏆👏👏👏👏🤗😍🤪

  • @kishornatu7877
    @kishornatu7877 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cutting speed and feed are extremely high.Seems only for demo piece. For production batches, such cutting parameters will never maintain
    required tolerances

    • @MF175mp
      @MF175mp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      High feed is good, speed for roughing too high and depth too shallow.

  • @williambuxton8223
    @williambuxton8223 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Bigger cuts less m/m ,
    3 out of 10

  • @andreasungar8043
    @andreasungar8043 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    well done! nice feedrate.
    they dont understand why there is no coolant? :-D
    ein paar amateure finden dieses video wohl schlecht weil kein kühlmittel durch die gegend spritzt, wer genau aufpasst wird allerdings bemerken dass er es abgeschaltet hat damit überhaupt etwas zu sehen ist.
    die vorschubraten sind optimal, die zustellung ist optimal, beim gewinde würde ich vielleicht anfangs etwas mehr zustellen. ansonsten perfekt und schön azusehen.
    fanuc steuerung?

    • @janwintraken
      @janwintraken 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      der einzige Amateur bist anscheinend du :D ein gigantischer haufen Leerschnitte und scheiße verwendete Zyklen. Es wurde absolut keine Rückzugsebene oder ein Sicherheitsabstand beim 55grad stahl verwendet und die Zustellung ist viel zu gering.Wer sowas in einer Firma auf lange Sicht anwendet arbeitet nicht lange dort. Die Zustellung beum Gewindedrehen ist genau richtig weil er entlang einer Gewindeflanke zustellt. Scheint als müsstest du mal nen gescheiten Lehrmeister kriegen

  • @badgermamba4374
    @badgermamba4374 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Coolant is not hiting the tool properly.. Even though the feed is high we can control the tool wear by providing more coolant to tool edge.. Poor turning program, chance for vibration too high..

  • @AlekseyCamodelkin
    @AlekseyCamodelkin 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍👍👍

  • @rohitdabhade1385
    @rohitdabhade1385 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Plz program photo

  • @Weisior
    @Weisior 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    2 finishing processes at same z,y ?

    • @skylersanful
      @skylersanful  9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It was because I came in at .02 clearance then cut .015 I think. I didn't redo the project anymore because that was good enough to turn in.

    • @Weisior
      @Weisior 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      oh

    • @WIPEYOURLENZ
      @WIPEYOURLENZ 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ZLY WEISIOR
      It's X and Z

    • @Weisior
      @Weisior 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      greasemonger29 On Mazak lathes which Im working on there are z as horizontal line. 

    • @WIPEYOURLENZ
      @WIPEYOURLENZ 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      ZLY WEISIOR
      Yes I work a mazak nexus 450 and z is horizontal with the spindle then you have x and y but you don't need the y axis for this job. Not on my machine.

  • @CadZoo
    @CadZoo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hlo sir can u send this program

  • @milanmohanta5363
    @milanmohanta5363 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Plz tell the codes

  • @amitpanchal1841
    @amitpanchal1841 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    NICE Work

  • @suvankardas6044
    @suvankardas6044 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    program send please

  • @adityaaldisp7748
    @adityaaldisp7748 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Absolute or incremental?

    • @CampfireCrucifix
      @CampfireCrucifix 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only psychopaths program in incremental

  • @miguelantonioantonio6921
    @miguelantonioantonio6921 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    💥💥💥💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖

  • @PhilipMReeder
    @PhilipMReeder 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Amazing the number of CNC "experts" commenting here who do not understand the video title and its relationship to the project, or that this video is 3 years old.
    Jeez...

  • @AnkitSingh-me4di
    @AnkitSingh-me4di 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice

  • @gabrielnascimento9953
    @gabrielnascimento9953 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Como eu vim parar aqui mano?

  • @Slaytanic454
    @Slaytanic454 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your OD roughing depth of cut makes me sad, lol. And your thread chamfer amount makes it do a funny little move at the back of thread. Unless you didn't actually want the thread to run out into that groove/undercut?

  • @vyatskiy1973
    @vyatskiy1973 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    неоптимизированная обработка коллега. Попробуйте точить все продольной подачей

    • @skylersanful
      @skylersanful  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Согласен. Я был в школе. преподаватель заставил нас работать в "безопасной" манере.

    • @СигизмундПравильный
      @СигизмундПравильный 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@skylersanful Приветствую. Можно было канавку почистить, опустившись после резьбового диаметра на дно канавки VCMT пластиной и почистить левую стенку полность, а не так как на видео). И второй чистовой проход был какой то странный, вы прошли тем же размером из за чего поверхность стала похуже. А так...зачёт).

  • @thetruth6872
    @thetruth6872 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This one isn’t half bad. Must be a different programmer. The other video was rookie shit.

  • @mohandhasan2434
    @mohandhasan2434 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing

  • @mcgarden_
    @mcgarden_ 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    G819 right :)

  • @juliussd5901
    @juliussd5901 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:10 Turtles having sex

  • @muratyldzel4866
    @muratyldzel4866 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sadece gülüyorum 😁😎

  • @MrRiussss
    @MrRiussss 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    M08!! M08!!!!!

  • @良良-w4k
    @良良-w4k 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    現在工作都只放1.5切深 和F0.24 速度加快增加太多的不穩定性

  • @jorgemorais4005
    @jorgemorais4005 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice!!!

  • @洪素鶴-t2u
    @洪素鶴-t2u 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    車牙刀具讚

  • @emmanuelseguraosorio9405
    @emmanuelseguraosorio9405 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Que?

  • @MrGhetto1992
    @MrGhetto1992 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    wasn bullshit xD

    • @skylersanful
      @skylersanful  8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is probably the nicest thing someones ever said to me.

  • @guigui5943
    @guigui5943 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Comment ne pas faire une pièce sur tour CN
    How not to make a part on CNC lathe

  • @916363
    @916363 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Это плохое программирование. Плохой пример. Так делать нельзя. Много моментов, где деталь могло вырвать. Лишние передвижения инструмента. Малый съем, большая подача, резец горит, а не режет.

  • @alializadeh8195
    @alializadeh8195 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    مرسی

  • @orianatoro559
    @orianatoro559 6 ปีที่แล้ว

  • @Rakeshkumar-nu5vt
    @Rakeshkumar-nu5vt 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    How to create a program

  • @GovenorGravity
    @GovenorGravity 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    M08

  • @docobo2948
    @docobo2948 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You lose a lot of time in all operations.

  • @СаняЧелебий
    @СаняЧелебий 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Да... 1к62 отдыхает...

  • @adnanbilgic6275
    @adnanbilgic6275 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kaba talaş ama onunda bi gururu var aq o ne öyle

  • @tmektl27
    @tmektl27 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You didn't hand program that spherical radius (not that way) nice try though

    • @timschjei3917
      @timschjei3917 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Why do you think that's difficult? The rough cycles remove most of the material.

  • @balamuruganmurga4779
    @balamuruganmurga4779 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Colande on

  • @РоманВасильчук-э4й
    @РоманВасильчук-э4й 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Нетехнологичная программа, видно писал делитант. Можно сделать гораздо быстрее и качественнее. И резьба нарезается по дурацкому, отскок вверх потом вниз. Там либо первый Х поменять либо К.