yes LHF trade but your not correct on the higher high inside. Lower low inside is the setup for the pump and dump. Higher high inside is the setup for the dump and pump. in this case what you called the range expansion was the lower low inside.
Thank you so much, my friend. You’re absolutely right! I told you that used to confuse the hell outta me and I guess it still does! lol Right, because that lower low on the inside is what clears out the low of day level(the “snowplow”) before pumping back up prior to the session for the dump. Damn it, that’s an important distinction. I’m going to pin your comment here, if you don’t mind. It ain’t about being right, it’s about helping the next person. I appreciate your honesty and correcting me. You’re the type I like to have around Please, if you have anything else to add, feel free! 🙏
Same is true for the higher high. The higher high on the inside set up for the dump and pump. The higher high on the inside clears out the current high of the day before dumping down, maybe three push pattern into the low before pumping up. Hmmm, very good stuff. It makes total sense. That’s exactly what Stacey says. Somehow though, lol, I’ve been using this model. That’s wild but I love it
@@freeyourmind4349 no problem mate! The simple formula is: pump,coil, lower low, dump. Or dump, coil, higher high, pump. Can be over 3 days, 3 sessions, 3 hours
Thanks for sharing this video, I think you are one of the best explainers of SB's trading style. I have to say I really like the way you do it. Please, keep going.
As per Stacey P&D || D&P doesn't occur in a trending market. So is it safe to conclude that p&d || d&p can be seen only in the range bound market on a higher time frame. Please correct me if wrong. Thanks.
Hey there, thanks for the question! I don’t recall Stacey saying that. Stacey says that EVERY trade is one of two basic templates; pump and dump or dump and pump. Go check out Stacey’s playlist titled “Everything you need to know is in this playlist”. In the first bunch of videos of that playlist, Stacy draws out the pump and dump and dump and pump set ups. He shows that we are looking for these set ups to occur over the course of three days or three sessions. They definitely occur in trending markets. Any trade that you see Stacey talk about is either a P&D or D&P!
@freeyourmind4349 thank you for the clarification, just in case I come back accross the video where he mentions something like this. I will post in the thread. Though just speaking my mind, if the market is trending, it ideally should not d&p or p&d, there can be pullbacks, but not necessarily p&d or d&p. Rather in a strong uptrend the market would just p,p,p pullback and then p,p,p. Vice-versa would be true for a downtrend. d,d,d,d pullback and ddd. If there is consolidation in these trends we might see a p&d or a d&p, with a inside structure hh, hl ( in a downtrend consolidation) and a lh, ll ( in an uptrend consolidation).
@kjkunte that’s not how it works, sorry. First off, we need to clarify your definition of the word trending. There is no such thing as a downtrend consolidation. There is a such thing as a “short squeeze” set up, which is what I believe you’re referring to. This is basic stuff so we have to clear it out. A market that is in a downtrend is in the process of printing LL’s&LH’s. And this is all relative to your timeframe. In a down trending market that is printing LL’s&LH’s, the LL is considered a “weak low”(because it will be broken when the next LL prints) and the LH is considered a “strong high(because it is the high that was responsible for the next BoS to the downside and since we are in a downtrend the LH should not be broken). The exact opposite is the case for an up trending market. A market that is in an up trend is in the process of printing higher highs and higher lows. The higher lows are considered strong lows because they are the low that is responsible for the next breaking structure to the upside and the higher lows in an uptrend should not be broken. The higher highs in an up trend are considered weak highs because they are broken as we continue the up trend. When you describe the market movement as pump, pump, pump or dump, dump, dump…those are the parabolic price movements that Stacey is trading and looking to identify as they come out of a three day or three session coil or a pump and dump or pump and dump that takes place over the course of three days(for three day setups) or three sessions(for three session set ups). Stacey doesn’t teach basic concepts on his channel such as “how to identify an uptrend vs down trend vs trading range”. So, you’ll have to get that information from somewhere else. Trends take place on all timeframes. Stacey and I both “day trade” the markets, meaning we aren’t interested in holding trades overnight or over the weekend. Stacy is hunting parabolic trade set ups that give 30 minutes to 45 minutes of explosive movement in one direction. There are some occasions when a trade can be held longer than that but if you’re trading the right sets, that’s all you need because you can SIZE into these RINSE & REPEAT set ups. An uptrend doesn’t mean a series of up closing candles. The uptrend doesn’t end when we have a down closing candle. We have what are called swing highs and swing lows. These are the higher highs and higher lows or lower lows and lower highs depending on if we are in an uptrend or downtrend. Whatever price action occurs inside of these so-called swing highs and swing Lows Doesn’t matter at all, according to the higher timeframe trend. Inside price action doesn’t change a thing. Idk where you learned from, initially, as far as how to identify the various phases of the market but cast a wider net and see what you haul in. It sounds like you’ve been learning something like “The Strat” by rob smith and are deciphering price action candle by candle and most people do not use a system like that to describe price action.
I’m probably wrong about the candle by candle interpretation but I’m just trying to figure out how you might be looking at your charts and identifying trends vs consolidations. Stacey has a unique view of consolidations and identifying geometrical high and low ranges so on and so forth…but basically we are identifying the most recent swing high and swing low and waiting for price to break out of either the high or low of that range, paying attention for false breakouts.
@@freeyourmind4349 Thanks, I am trying to get hold of the things that you both are trying to say. I get them in bits and pieces. But I am not able to paint the whole picture. Will check out what 'The Strat' is. Thanks again!!
yes LHF trade but your not correct on the higher high inside. Lower low inside is the setup for the pump and dump. Higher high inside is the setup for the dump and pump. in this case what you called the range expansion was the lower low inside.
Thank you so much, my friend. You’re absolutely right! I told you that used to confuse the hell outta me and I guess it still does! lol
Right, because that lower low on the inside is what clears out the low of day level(the “snowplow”) before pumping back up prior to the session for the dump.
Damn it, that’s an important distinction. I’m going to pin your comment here, if you don’t mind. It ain’t about being right, it’s about helping the next person. I appreciate your honesty and correcting me. You’re the type I like to have around
Please, if you have anything else to add, feel free! 🙏
Same is true for the higher high. The higher high on the inside set up for the dump and pump.
The higher high on the inside clears out the current high of the day before dumping down, maybe three push pattern into the low before pumping up.
Hmmm, very good stuff. It makes total sense. That’s exactly what Stacey says.
Somehow though, lol, I’ve been using this model. That’s wild but I love it
@@freeyourmind4349 no problem mate! The simple formula is: pump,coil, lower low, dump. Or dump, coil, higher high, pump. Can be over 3 days, 3 sessions, 3 hours
Thanks for sharing this video, I think you are one of the best explainers of SB's trading style. I have to say I really like the way you do it. Please,
keep going.
Man, thank you so much for the kind words! That means a lot to me.
We ain’t stopping any time soon!
This was a ON POINT explanation.. Keep these vids coming man please do
Thank you! 🙏
Made my day! I appreciate you
Another great video! I wish I could hit the LIKE button 1000 times!!
Thank you 🙏 🙏🙏
It means a lot to me to know this is helping even one person out there!
Liking it 1000 times will end in a no like.
Please add 1 more😂😂❤
hahaha
I see you made great improvements on your vids 😉
No choice! I’m trying, my friend
@@freeyourmind4349 Cool, I wish you good luck!
As per Stacey P&D || D&P doesn't occur in a trending market. So is it safe to conclude that p&d || d&p can be seen only in the range bound market on a higher time frame. Please correct me if wrong. Thanks.
Hey there, thanks for the question!
I don’t recall Stacey saying that.
Stacey says that EVERY trade is one of two basic templates; pump and dump or dump and pump.
Go check out Stacey’s playlist titled “Everything you need to know is in this playlist”. In the first bunch of videos of that playlist, Stacy draws out the pump and dump and dump and pump set ups. He shows that we are looking for these set ups to occur over the course of three days or three sessions.
They definitely occur in trending markets. Any trade that you see Stacey talk about is either a P&D or D&P!
@freeyourmind4349 thank you for the clarification, just in case I come back accross the video where he mentions something like this. I will post in the thread. Though just speaking my mind, if the market is trending, it ideally should not d&p or p&d, there can be pullbacks, but not necessarily p&d or d&p. Rather in a strong uptrend the market would just p,p,p pullback and then p,p,p. Vice-versa would be true for a downtrend. d,d,d,d pullback and ddd. If there is consolidation in these trends we might see a p&d or a d&p, with a inside structure hh, hl ( in a downtrend consolidation) and a lh, ll ( in an uptrend consolidation).
@kjkunte that’s not how it works, sorry.
First off, we need to clarify your definition of the word trending. There is no such thing as a downtrend consolidation. There is a such thing as a “short squeeze” set up, which is what I believe you’re referring to.
This is basic stuff so we have to clear it out. A market that is in a downtrend is in the process of printing LL’s&LH’s. And this is all relative to your timeframe. In a down trending market that is printing LL’s&LH’s, the LL is considered a “weak low”(because it will be broken when the next LL prints) and the LH is considered a “strong high(because it is the high that was responsible for the next BoS to the downside and since we are in a downtrend the LH should not be broken). The exact opposite is the case for an up trending market.
A market that is in an up trend is in the process of printing higher highs and higher lows. The higher lows are considered strong lows because they are the low that is responsible for the next breaking structure to the upside and the higher lows in an uptrend should not be broken.
The higher highs in an up trend are considered weak highs because they are broken as we continue the up trend.
When you describe the market movement as pump, pump, pump or dump, dump, dump…those are the parabolic price movements that Stacey is trading and looking to identify as they come out of a three day or three session coil or a pump and dump or pump and dump that takes place over the course of three days(for three day setups) or three sessions(for three session set ups).
Stacey doesn’t teach basic concepts on his channel such as “how to identify an uptrend vs down trend vs trading range”. So, you’ll have to get that information from somewhere else.
Trends take place on all timeframes. Stacey and I both “day trade” the markets, meaning we aren’t interested in holding trades overnight or over the weekend.
Stacy is hunting parabolic trade set ups that give 30 minutes to 45 minutes of explosive movement in one direction. There are some occasions when a trade can be held longer than that but if you’re trading the right sets, that’s all you need because you can SIZE into these RINSE & REPEAT set ups.
An uptrend doesn’t mean a series of up closing candles. The uptrend doesn’t end when we have a down closing candle.
We have what are called swing highs and swing lows. These are the higher highs and higher lows or lower lows and lower highs depending on if we are in an uptrend or downtrend.
Whatever price action occurs inside of these so-called swing highs and swing Lows Doesn’t matter at all, according to the higher timeframe trend. Inside price action doesn’t change a thing.
Idk where you learned from, initially, as far as how to identify the various phases of the market but cast a wider net and see what you haul in. It sounds like you’ve been learning something like “The Strat” by rob smith and are deciphering price action candle by candle and most people do not use a system like that to describe price action.
I’m probably wrong about the candle by candle interpretation but I’m just trying to figure out how you might be looking at your charts and identifying trends vs consolidations.
Stacey has a unique view of consolidations and identifying geometrical high and low ranges so on and so forth…but basically we are identifying the most recent swing high and swing low and waiting for price to break out of either the high or low of that range, paying attention for false breakouts.
@@freeyourmind4349 Thanks, I am trying to get hold of the things that you both are trying to say. I get them in bits and pieces. But I am not able to paint the whole picture. Will check out what 'The Strat' is. Thanks again!!
Bro are you telling us secrets?
Nope!
@freeyourmind4349 🫤
You are stupid that's how market work
Keep bragging on how rich you getting
Excuse me?