@@Y.M... biology is rote memorization... Joke of the year😂.. you don't read real stuff i guess... Ever heard of mathematical biology, biophysics, Mechano biology etc If biology is rote memorization why do you even study it.. lol we do have storage devices.... Rocket science is hard but it doesn't mean biology is rote memorization...
@@jackyjack9660 you list the exceptions that one meets on some very narrow and specialized fields. There's maths in *some* biology, sure. But there's maths in *most* rocket science.
@@Y.M... no its not... its real biology... I didn't considered childish biology to be biology...this is what one starts with biology... i have been in IITs for biological science course... so I know what's What... Their are plenty of things in biology which is maths... Mathematical biology is common in physiology, evolutionary and developmental biology... Cellular biology also comprises of maths... Molecular biology (I don't need to tell you this)... "Their is some maths in biology"... Yeah but ever wondered why?... Because things are not isolated and gets complex... The biology we see today is not developed like Physics and maths... We are far behind in this field... And so these new branches like quantum biology, computational biology, bioinformatics etc are appearing because we now know maths is necessary component to explain things in biology... Rocket science is hard in sense of what? Just because its consists of very hard maths which many understands and no i don't understand the core rocket Physics because its not my field i am a biophysicist (i have mbbs degree and msc in biophysics, currently doing m.phil) not a rocket scientist...yeah its hard but not impossible... Biology mysteries are complex and sometimes impossible...take for example cancer biology (seems hard and complex)... And i will not compare the two fields because Scientists know that Every field has its own unique complexity and mysteries to find... Their are plenty of fields in biology that involves maths for example... Rheology in biological systems involves same Physics concepts... Mass transfer from transport phenomena (taught in chemical engineering) is used in physiology... Genetics which is based on maths and was developed by a mathematician... Using fick's law to explain diffusion in biological system... I can challenge you just show me where you need to mug up in physiology... Its based on biophysics and is a conceptual subject... Immunology which professor Dave explained is basic and undergraduate level immunology are basic... In masters you can yourself look for mathematical immunology... Biology for you i guess is rote learning and these things are highly specialised but for me these are in masters level and some are also in undergraduate level... At m.phil and PhD level things get more mathematical and complex...
So I cant pay attention in class but I can watch Dave an retain information. I have no discipline Great video as always, very interesting and in-depth while not being too blah blah and lecture like
Hi, congratulations for the nice, clear and schematic videos of the fundamental concepts for immunology. Sorry, can I know which book or books you recommend to study for a biological sciences student who is approaching immunology for the first time?Thank you!
Hey Dave , could you do a video debunking Ayurveda please , it is much needed here in India where people prefer pseudoscientific medicine like homeopathy and ayurveda over western medicine
Seriously, is this a trap question? How the heck would you expect someone to study a thousands year subtle science and do a decent credible job of debunking it? I don't know much about Ayurveda but I do not it is not one thing you could easily debunk. I recall recently watching an exchange between Sadguru and a western scientist who was inquisitive and skeptical. There was an acknowledgment that as western instruments improve western biology achieves greater understanding. There was also a reference to the many thousands of reports about the experience of people doing meditations. Sadguru's response was along the lines of You have statistically significant reporting, why must you disregard this because your measuring instruments are no precise or sensitive enough to confirm what is being reported? Likewise, I say that "science is always a work in progress. It is a best guess. In 50 years much of what we think we know and teach now will be wrong." Take for example gravitational cosmology. 350 years ago Newton identified and name gravity. 300 years ago science agreed that gravity was the organising principle of the universe. At that time they didn't know anything about plasma physics. They didn't know that plasma existed, that it is electrically active or that electricity is 36 orders of magnitude more powerful than gravity. They came up with a cosmology based on gravity but 300 years later we are learning that was a mistake.
@@cookieman2028 Is that your opinion or fact? I've followed the development of Electric Universe and Plasma Cosmology for 20 years. There is so much predictive value in this approach. Hard to imagine how or why you would claim Plasma Cosmology to be irrelevant. Perhaps you just don't know?
Why does my comment keep disappearing? I re wrote it 4 times noooow. I dont have any bad words or slurs in it? I'm not violating terms? Idk... I give up. I guess I won't ask my question. Thanks for the amazing videos professor Dave.
Great work! Can you please make a video about Behe latest book "A mousetrap for Darwin"? Behe claims that for the case of the bacterial flagellum was never resolved by claiming it evolved from a Type III secretion system. In fact, he says that the Type III system is MORE recent than the flagellum and came later. Can you put a video on a possible step-wise pathway from earlier precursors to even some rudimentary biological motor? How each step was possible selected, and then later fixed? I actually checked the literature briefly but couldn't find a coherent and complete response to this.
Am I wrong that teaching Immune System should be more than listing names for parts of the mechanism? Such as at least make sure people know the way science found out about protein-types? and how to distinguish between the different receptors in research and analysis? No it is not out of scope for beginners or students, mr.Dave, it is the necessary part of understand how the knowledge has come around and how certain we know about the antibody structures. Can we list the whole molecule? How did we come to that listing?
![[#2024MAMA] ROSÉ (로제), Bruno Mars - APT. | Mnet 241122 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dgGqD28J6aQ/mqdefault.jpg)
One of the first videos to actually talk about receptors in depth
I was just thinking that
Uci open has an immunology playlist. It may go to far for what you are needing.
Get this guy in a pod cast with Eric Dubay both have "intellectual perspectives"
Wow, I feel like this is going into more detail than the 400 level immunology class that I took years ago did. Great stuff.
Finally, a good video about immune cell receptors ! I have been always confused what is the role of each receptor. Very well explained, well done !
One dislike 15 minutes after posting? Must be Kent Hovind.
or jlp
No that arrogant man just does not comment as he thinks it is beneath him.
Thank you! Today I learned that cytokine receptors are soluble proteins used for long distance cell signaling.
WHY DONT YOU HAVE MORE SUBSCRIBERS?!?!? THIS CHANNEL ROCKS!!!
No idea why it's rocket science that popular culture considers to be hard.
Rocket science is harder, biology is mostly rote memorization
@@Y.M... biology is rote memorization... Joke of the year😂.. you don't read real stuff i guess... Ever heard of mathematical biology, biophysics, Mechano biology etc
If biology is rote memorization why do you even study it.. lol we do have storage devices.... Rocket science is hard but it doesn't mean biology is rote memorization...
@@Y.M... so you can understand immunology ?🤔
@@jackyjack9660 you list the exceptions that one meets on some very narrow and specialized fields. There's maths in *some* biology, sure. But there's maths in *most* rocket science.
@@Y.M... no its not... its real biology... I didn't considered childish biology to be biology...this is what one starts with biology... i have been in IITs for biological science course... so I know what's What...
Their are plenty of things in biology which is maths... Mathematical biology is common in physiology, evolutionary and developmental biology... Cellular biology also comprises of maths... Molecular biology (I don't need to tell you this)...
"Their is some maths in biology"... Yeah but ever wondered why?... Because things are not isolated and gets complex... The biology we see today is not developed like Physics and maths... We are far behind in this field... And so these new branches like quantum biology, computational biology, bioinformatics etc are appearing because we now know maths is necessary component to explain things in biology... Rocket science is hard in sense of what? Just because its consists of very hard maths which many understands and no i don't understand the core rocket Physics because its not my field i am a biophysicist (i have mbbs degree and msc in biophysics, currently doing m.phil) not a rocket scientist...yeah its hard but not impossible... Biology mysteries are complex and sometimes impossible...take for example cancer biology (seems hard and complex)... And i will not compare the two fields because Scientists know that Every field has its own unique complexity and mysteries to find...
Their are plenty of fields in biology that involves maths for example... Rheology in biological systems involves same Physics concepts... Mass transfer from transport phenomena (taught in chemical engineering) is used in physiology... Genetics which is based on maths and was developed by a mathematician...
Using fick's law to explain diffusion in biological system... I can challenge you just show me where you need to mug up in physiology... Its based on biophysics and is a conceptual subject... Immunology which professor Dave explained is basic and undergraduate level immunology are basic... In masters you can yourself look for mathematical immunology... Biology for you i guess is rote learning and these things are highly specialised but for me these are in masters level and some are also in undergraduate level... At m.phil and PhD level things get more mathematical and complex...
Professor Dave, could you make a video evaluating the validity of chiropractic neurology?
I finally understand the difference between cytokines et chemokines! Thank you!
Thank you Professor Dave! Could you please make a series on cancer mechanisms such as the ones you talked about in this video?
YESSS 🤗I'm So So Excited about THIS VIDEO 💯❤❤❤Thank you so so much for making these AWESOME Videos ❤❤❤
I’m so glad for this information. I will be watching your other videos! 😎
From tiny cells to expanding universe we are surrounded by wonders...I will die soon before finding out interesting things
😭😭😭😭
WOW !!! Information Overload
So I cant pay attention in class but I can watch Dave an retain information. I have no discipline
Great video as always, very interesting and in-depth while not being too blah blah and lecture like
yeah I'll have to watch this 10+ times to understand just the words
I subscribed your channel when you had less than 1 k subs .its nice to see you grow this much.😊😊
Thankyou for your very informative lecture. Could you please do one on HMGB1 and TLR4 signalling pathways please.
That was great, I was really confused with immune cell receptors. it was brilliant , thank you
Wonder what role sound plays . We have devices to magnify light . But can we focus &lify sounds from that scale
Hi professor just need a like
Hi, congratulations for the nice, clear and schematic videos of the fundamental concepts for immunology. Sorry, can I know which book or books you recommend to study for a biological sciences student who is approaching immunology for the first time?Thank you!
Dave I love youre music from Simulated sun The Emergence was amazing
Glad I didn’t try to go into a biological science but took to flying airplanes instead.
Equally glad there are smart people who did!
Sorry off topic: Iv noticed some of the music equipment in the background, do you have any music out anywhere or is it just a hobby???
Check out Simulated Sun from my featured channels list!
Hey Dave , could you do a video debunking Ayurveda please , it is much needed here in India where people prefer pseudoscientific medicine like homeopathy and ayurveda over western medicine
Seriously, is this a trap question? How the heck would you expect someone to study a thousands year subtle science and do a decent credible job of debunking it?
I don't know much about Ayurveda but I do not it is not one thing you could easily debunk.
I recall recently watching an exchange between Sadguru and a western scientist who was inquisitive and skeptical. There was an acknowledgment that as western instruments improve western biology achieves greater understanding. There was also a reference to the many thousands of reports about the experience of people doing meditations. Sadguru's response was along the lines of You have statistically significant reporting, why must you disregard this because your measuring instruments are no precise or sensitive enough to confirm what is being reported?
Likewise, I say that "science is always a work in progress. It is a best guess. In 50 years much of what we think we know and teach now will be wrong." Take for example gravitational cosmology. 350 years ago Newton identified and name gravity. 300 years ago science agreed that gravity was the organising principle of the universe. At that time they didn't know anything about plasma physics. They didn't know that plasma existed, that it is electrically active or that electricity is 36 orders of magnitude more powerful than gravity. They came up with a cosmology based on gravity but 300 years later we are learning that was a mistake.
@@villagemediainfo What are you talking about? Plasma cosmology has been irrelevant for decades
@@cookieman2028 Is that your opinion or fact? I've followed the development of Electric Universe and Plasma Cosmology for 20 years. There is so much predictive value in this approach. Hard to imagine how or why you would claim Plasma Cosmology to be irrelevant. Perhaps you just don't know?
huh thats coincidential i just had my immunology exam 2 days ago
Amazing
Professor Dave are you uploading today?
Not today, pulling back a little for the summer.
Hey professor, I love your videos. You are very cool.
Hi Professor Dave. Do you have a simple explanation about cytokines? Thank you.
yep check the immunology playlist
Are you also Bobby, from Bobby plays?
can you recommend for me a book to understand the extraction of alkaloids?
and thanks
Not gonna lie, I thought he said pimps at first. :)
Why does my comment keep disappearing? I re wrote it 4 times noooow. I dont have any bad words or slurs in it? I'm not violating terms? Idk... I give up. I guess I won't ask my question. Thanks for the amazing videos professor Dave.
Question.
If you stop your kalsium intace and replace IT with, say Steel, would your body replace your skeleton with Steel?
No, that's not how bone metabolism works. Real life Wolverine is not possible.
@@johansen9224 OK
Great work! Can you please make a video about Behe latest book "A mousetrap for Darwin"? Behe claims that for the case of the bacterial flagellum was never resolved by claiming it evolved from a Type III secretion system. In fact, he says that the Type III system is MORE recent than the flagellum and came later. Can you put a video on a possible step-wise pathway from earlier precursors to even some rudimentary biological motor? How each step was possible selected, and then later fixed? I actually checked the literature briefly but couldn't find a coherent and complete response to this.
Pamps and damps lol
cd6
Am I wrong that teaching Immune System should be more than listing names for parts of the mechanism? Such as at least make sure people know the way science found out about protein-types? and how to distinguish between the different receptors in research and analysis? No it is not out of scope for beginners or students, mr.Dave, it is the necessary part of understand how the knowledge has come around and how certain we know about the antibody structures. Can we list the whole molecule? How did we come to that listing?
Waw
Hello everyone
Hey, sorry if this isn't too relevant to the vid, but just wanted to know, trans rights or nah?
When Jesus is your science teache🤣
First view 🔥