The Simulation of the Roman Empire (from 800 BCE to 1484 CE), including its economy, people, government, military and more. 로마 제국의 시뮬레이션으로 경제, 시민, 정부, 군사 등을 포함하고 있습니다. Backdoor: th-cam.com/video/kgRtHI80B4E/w-d-xo.html
Eternal glory to our formidable Byzantine ancestors. For preserving and delivering our Ancient Greek heritage. And for blending it majestically with our splendid Christian Orthodox tradition. God bless 🇬🇷 ☦️
Or else, in the words of a distinguished Byzantine Greek of the time; “For we are Hellenes by race and Romans by polity, which means that we are both the heirs of the Greek wisdom and the upholders of Roman law.” Georgios Gemistos Plethon, prominent Byzantine Scholar (14th century).
@Theodoros_Kolokotronis thank you for acknowledging the roman part. So many Greeks just take the greek part of East Rome. From justinian to Constantine XI it's just big Greece to them.
Unfortunately, some users are hovering between ignorance and biased perceptions due to their ethnic background. Facts are very clear. The term Roman did not determine national identity or ancestry at the time, but citizenship. Roman Emperor Caracalla issued the Antonine Constitution (early 3rd century AD), which granted Roman citizenship to all free men throughout the Roman Empire. A Roman citizen could of Greek, of Serbian, of Bulgarian, of Armenian, of Georgian heritage etc. However, the majority of the Byzantines (Eastern Roman citizens), native for centuries in the region of Asia Minor before the Roman Empire emerged, were of ethnic Greek background. Their Roman citizenship had nothing to do with their distinct heritage. An English doesn't stop being English (ethnic identity) because he is British (political identity) and a medieval Greek wasn't any less Greek (ethnic identity) because he was a Roman citizen (political identity). Their citizenship, didn't contradict in any way their distinct ethnic Greek ancestry, determined by race and heritage. No matter the detrimental evidence in the region and the primary sources available, some users distort historical facts and “fail” to contemplate them my friend..
10:47 I believe the roman fire was a sewage mixture because romans were very into the craft of pipefitting and a pipefitter can make a flame flower prototype. also sewage is flammable and explosive
I took an Ancestry DNA test and I found out I have ancestry from Roman Italy that's linked to ancient Crete, I wouldn't be surprised the Classical Greeks and Romans were descendants of the Myceneans and the Minoans.
modern greeks still have on average 70-80% mycenean dna and this is actually higher in southern italians (who are also of greek descent due to greek colonization)
Genetic studies that have been performed in recent years, regarding the ancestry of the main Greek ethnic groups and their relativity with each other, validate historical facts. Researchers analyzed genome-wide data from individuals, including Minoans, Mycenaeans, Neolithic individuals from mainland Greece, and Bronze Age individuals from southwestern Anatolia. By comparing the data generated from these persons with previously published data from others, both ancient and modern, they were able to clarify the relationships between these groups. 3.000 BC Aegeans are homogeneous and derive ancestry mainly from Neolithic farmers. Bronze Age (BA) mainland Helladic, Cycladic, and Minoan genomes from the Aegean were sequenced. The researchers found that the Minoans, rather than coming from a distant civilization, were locals, descended from the first Neolithic farmers of the Aegean basin (western Anatolia and the Aegean Sea). They also found that the Minoans and Mycenaeans were very closely related to each other and to modern Greeks. There were at least two additional migrations in the Aegean before the time of the Minoans and Mycenaeans and some additional admixture later. The Greeks have always been a “work in progress” in which minor layers of migration through the ages added to, but did not erase the genetic heritage of the native Bronze Age populations. Standing in these lands for millenniums, always guarding Thermopylae. Always fighting against the odds. Eternal Hellas 🔥🇬🇷
no they had intermarriage but were not descended. that would be like saying the yiddish were descendants of germanic tribes. the classical greeks were direct descent from the myceneans, the minoans were middle eastern and more likely related to the phoenecians, hittites, and cypriots. the romans and greeks were northern tribes who were indo europeans that came from what is now modern russia.
Rome adopted a lot from its more ancient predecessors - the Etruscans, but Rome does not like to remember this and tries to forget it... At first, for a long time, due to the presence of the Etruscan element in the power of Rome, power in Rome was widely represented by people with fair skin and blond hair, while the Italians (Latins) were often dark-skinned and dark-haired representatives of the Indo-European family.
Así es, pero finalmente fueron los latinos de Lascio quienes se impusieron durante la República, el rubio de ojos azules llegó a ser sinónimo de barbaríe, carroña e incivilidad, las prostitutas tenían por ley romana la obligación de teñirse el pelo de rubio, símbolo de impureza, los rubios eran exhibidos en Roma tal como los imperios blancos exhibieron negros en zoológicos
@@РАшенСлавянов well, the etruscans were, and now they are Italians, im from Tuscany, which is a province of Italy, and is the Place where there are etruscans. Literally.
Complimenti per il lavoro, molto esaustivo sul piano temporale e geografico. Interessante la scheda degli eventi, peccato però che non si legga bene essendo le scritte nel riquadro troppo in piccolo e in basso a sinistra.
Being native in Asia Minor already for over a millennium, before the Roman Empire emerged, Greek people have always been the predominant ethnic group in the East. They never vanished from their homelands, even after being granted Roman citinzenship. Theophanes the Confessor was a prominent Byzantine Greek Scholar and Chronicler. His monumental work “Chronographia” (Χρονογραφία), covers the events from the accession of Diocletian in 284 AD (which is the point where the Chronicle of George Syncellus ends), to the downfall of Emperor Michael I in 813 AD. This part of the Chronicle is valuable for having preserved the accounts of lost authorities on Byzantine history for the seventh and eighth centuries that would be otherwise have been lost. A notable work and a unique testimony of the Greek legacy of the Byzantine Empire.
they were native but not predominant. the greeks were in western anatolia for a long time ever since the mycenean settlement circa 1400 BC. it only spread from greek colonization after alexander in the 300s BC, and it was only in the city centers, the countryside were still the middle eastern semitic peoples.
Greek people are deep rooted in these lands mate, for millenniums. We are one with the sea. Greeks were always predominant along the coasts of the Mediterranean and in key cities of the Byzantine Empire.
Only the masters of Ancient & Medieval history can answer the question buddy. Certainly not you and me. “Greeks were generally the largest and most influential ethnic group in both Anatolia and the Byzantine Empire, especially from the Hellenistic period onward. By the time of the Byzantine Empire, Greeks were the predominant ethnic group in the urban and administrative centers, particularly in Constantinople and other key cities. Greek became the official language in the Empire under Emperor Heraclius in the 7th century. This cemented the cultural dominance of Greek-speaking populations, especially in Asia Minor (Anatolia), which was a vital part of the empire. Many influential figures, such as Byzantine Emperors and Military Commanders, came from Greek-speaking regions”. Arnold J. Toynbee, prominent English Historian-Byzantinist, excerpt from his monumental series of books “A Study of History”.
Vraiment sympa votre vidéo Même si j'ai une question -45 un etat sous "influence romaine' est apparu en Syrie dans votre animation carte c'est quel le nom de royaume ou autre ? Si je me troumpe pas Je croyais que ce territoire etait en contrôle (une province impériale )importante par rome -64 Merci
While Rome's hostility to Turks dated back to late antiquity particularly against Tengrist Oghuric entities like the Bulgars, Avars, Huns, the arrival of Seljuks marked the begin of a new front against a distinct Muslim powerhouse conquering their way into Anatolia
borders weren't a real thing back then. So they necessarily can't be correct. View them as general, fluctuating, soft boundaries of where some settlements of one tribe most likely stopped and where, gradually, those of another tribe began
there is a few mistake about the date . there is a big information source in book about ottoman in that century . Âşıkpaşazâde history book written in 14 century about the ottoman first year . this is the oldest aviable source . but there is one more oldest one . its yahsi fakih . but its not exist . Âşıkpaşazâde history book is telling us about this book
L evento più importante accaduto durante la Civiltà Romana è stato quando in una Provincia lontana da Roma, in un piccolo villaggio, una ragazza di 16 anni ha dato alla luce un bambino. La fanciulla si chiamava Maria.
Next chapter: Spanish Empire (Imperio español / Monarquía hispánica) 1402 (Conquest of Canary Islands) 1492 (Fall Granada/America) War of 80 years until Independences of Spanish American Viceroyalties (great civil war) and last territories (1861-1976)
I'd probably argue that the Ottoman Beylik and Empire (and, by extension, the country of Turkey) were/are continuations of the Eastern Roman Empire, although Turkified and Islamized. They ruled over many of the same lands and same people, after all, and much Roman knowledge probably passed from the Romans to the Turks.
If my argument holds any merit, then one might argue that the "Roman" empire didn't fall until the 1920s, and even then one might argue that it lives on in the Turkish Republic.
There was no Judea in any book of Greek or Roman or Egyptian or Babylonian or Assyrian historians before the coming of a person who divided the dating into BC and AD.. . The Roman Empire called the area you spelled "Judea" Palestine
The HRE really should be included in these sorts of videos. Otto the Great, Otto III, Frederick Barbarossa, and Frederick II were as much Western Caesars as ANY of the heirs of Constantine.
There are few incorrect things in balkans I saw. Hvar and Brač were part of Neretva/Paganija what is described in DAI, Istria at the end of 8th century has been conquered by Francia , not Croatia after Ljutovid of Zahumlje ruled aswell in Serbia(Bosnia and Rascia) not only Zahumlje en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ljutovid_of_Zahumlje , for some reason on map Duklja after battle of Bar is presented without Duklja itself, city of Ras was byzantine from 11th century up to 1127 when serbs captured it, I can mention more altrough I don't see reason. Overall I can say that video nicely focused on other details like people, events etc presenting something that most of mapping video don't do. Main minus is see are borders in middle ages, I don't know so much about ancient period but middle ages seems to be in many parts done by tracing other videos and it sometimes hurts when there are more and less detailed borders next to each other on the same map only because videos have different amount of accuracy. Anyway I see progress compering older videos and I appreciate research done for additional informations in the dox and on ancient period
The Simulation of the Roman Empire (from 800 BCE to 1484 CE), including its economy, people, government, military and more.
로마 제국의 시뮬레이션으로 경제, 시민, 정부, 군사 등을 포함하고 있습니다.
Backdoor: th-cam.com/video/kgRtHI80B4E/w-d-xo.html
👍👍👍👍
very nice but you forgot about the Toparchy of Maina / Deme of Maina which never fell. The Mani peninsula did not fall to the Ottomans
I feel like the font could be changed as i and l look very similar. Maybe a font with serifs could fix this?
when im in an “being underrated” competition and Anwoo Mapping History walks in
the glaze is crazy
Complimenti per il video. Molto bello, chissà quanto lavoro per realizzarlo
Eternal glory to our formidable Byzantine ancestors. For preserving and delivering our Ancient Greek heritage. And for blending it majestically with our splendid Christian Orthodox tradition. God bless 🇬🇷 ☦️
Византия говно
@Theodoros_Kolokotronis They were both Greeks and Romans at the time of Byzantium. Greek language, and culture, but Roman identity.
Or else, in the words of a distinguished Byzantine Greek of the time;
“For we are Hellenes by race and Romans by polity, which means that we are both the heirs of the Greek wisdom and the upholders of Roman law.”
Georgios Gemistos Plethon, prominent Byzantine Scholar (14th century).
@Theodoros_Kolokotronis thank you for acknowledging the roman part. So many Greeks just take the greek part of East Rome. From justinian to Constantine XI it's just big Greece to them.
Unfortunately, some users are hovering between ignorance and biased perceptions due to their ethnic background. Facts are very clear.
The term Roman did not determine national identity or ancestry at the time, but citizenship. Roman Emperor Caracalla issued the Antonine Constitution (early 3rd century AD), which granted Roman citizenship to all free men throughout the Roman Empire. A Roman citizen could of Greek, of Serbian, of Bulgarian, of Armenian, of Georgian heritage etc.
However, the majority of the Byzantines (Eastern Roman citizens), native for centuries in the region of Asia Minor before the Roman Empire emerged, were of ethnic Greek background. Their Roman citizenship had nothing to do with their distinct heritage.
An English doesn't stop being English (ethnic identity) because he is British (political identity) and a medieval Greek wasn't any less Greek (ethnic identity) because he was a Roman citizen (political identity). Their citizenship, didn't contradict in any way their distinct ethnic Greek ancestry, determined by race and heritage.
No matter the detrimental evidence in the region and the primary sources available, some users distort historical facts and “fail” to contemplate them my friend..
literaly the most complete roman history timelapse video ever made there is no debate
Underrated video, you need more
That's a really good one!
OMG WHAT YOU ALSO INCLUDED OTHER NATIONS AND TRIBES IN THE MAP THIS DESERVES SO MANY FAME OMG
벌써 5주가 지났구나
어제올라왔는데 요즘 바빠서 늦었네요. 로마사 리메이크 올려주셔서 감사합니다.
기다려주셔서 감사합니다!
10:47 I believe the roman fire was a sewage mixture because romans were very into the craft of pipefitting and a pipefitter can make a flame flower prototype. also sewage is flammable and explosive
Ain’t it called Greek fire?
@@CrusaderBooga Yes but it was created by a Roman, albeit Greek-speaking, engineer
@@CrusaderBoogaToday, sure. But contemporarily it was referred to as πῦρ ῥωμαϊκόν ‘Roman fire’
I took an Ancestry DNA test and I found out I have ancestry from Roman Italy that's linked to ancient Crete, I wouldn't be surprised the Classical Greeks and Romans were descendants of the Myceneans and the Minoans.
modern greeks still have on average 70-80% mycenean dna and this is actually higher in southern italians (who are also of greek descent due to greek colonization)
@@dewd9327 modern greeks do not have that much mycenaean.
Genetic studies that have been performed in recent years, regarding the ancestry of the main Greek ethnic groups and their relativity with each other, validate historical facts.
Researchers analyzed genome-wide data from individuals, including Minoans, Mycenaeans, Neolithic individuals from mainland Greece, and Bronze Age individuals from southwestern Anatolia.
By comparing the data generated from these persons with previously published data from others, both ancient and modern, they were able to clarify the relationships between these groups.
3.000 BC Aegeans are homogeneous and derive ancestry mainly from Neolithic farmers. Bronze Age (BA) mainland Helladic, Cycladic, and Minoan genomes from the Aegean were sequenced.
The researchers found that the Minoans, rather than coming from a distant civilization, were locals, descended from the first Neolithic farmers of the Aegean basin (western Anatolia and the Aegean Sea). They also found that the Minoans and Mycenaeans were very closely related to each other and to modern Greeks.
There were at least two additional migrations in the Aegean before the time of the Minoans and Mycenaeans and some additional admixture later. The Greeks have always been a “work in progress” in which minor layers of migration through the ages added to, but did not erase the genetic heritage of the native Bronze Age populations.
Standing in these lands for millenniums, always guarding Thermopylae. Always fighting against the odds.
Eternal Hellas 🔥🇬🇷
no they had intermarriage but were not descended. that would be like saying the yiddish were descendants of germanic tribes. the classical greeks were direct descent from the myceneans, the minoans were middle eastern and more likely related to the phoenecians, hittites, and cypriots. the romans and greeks were northern tribes who were indo europeans that came from what is now modern russia.
Rome adopted a lot from its more ancient predecessors - the Etruscans, but Rome does not like to remember this and tries to forget it...
At first, for a long time, due to the presence of the Etruscan element in the power of Rome, power in Rome was widely represented by people with fair skin and blond hair, while the Italians (Latins) were often dark-skinned and dark-haired representatives of the Indo-European family.
Así es, pero finalmente fueron los latinos de Lascio quienes se impusieron durante la República, el rubio de ojos azules llegó a ser sinónimo de barbaríe, carroña e incivilidad, las prostitutas tenían por ley romana la obligación de teñirse el pelo de rubio, símbolo de impureza, los rubios eran exhibidos en Roma tal como los imperios blancos exhibieron negros en zoológicos
@@РАшенСлавянов well, the etruscans were, and now they are Italians, im from Tuscany, which is a province of Italy, and is the Place where there are etruscans. Literally.
the work put into this video is amazing
As a greek, im amazed by the video. Great job
As a turkish, you guys were rome
As an italian salute byantium brother
Absolutely beautiful
Complimenti per il lavoro, molto esaustivo sul piano temporale e geografico. Interessante la scheda degli eventi, peccato però che non si legga bene essendo le scritte nel riquadro troppo in piccolo e in basso a sinistra.
Ottimo lavoro!👍🏻
Being native in Asia Minor already for over a millennium, before the Roman Empire emerged, Greek people have always been the predominant ethnic group in the East.
They never vanished from their homelands, even after being granted Roman citinzenship.
Theophanes the Confessor was a prominent Byzantine Greek Scholar and Chronicler. His monumental work “Chronographia” (Χρονογραφία), covers the events from the accession of Diocletian in 284 AD (which is the point where the Chronicle of George Syncellus ends), to the downfall of Emperor Michael I in 813 AD.
This part of the Chronicle is valuable for having preserved the accounts of lost authorities on Byzantine history for the seventh and eighth centuries that would be otherwise have been lost.
A notable work and a unique testimony of the Greek legacy of the Byzantine Empire.
they were native but not predominant. the greeks were in western anatolia for a long time ever since the mycenean settlement circa 1400 BC. it only spread from greek colonization after alexander in the 300s BC, and it was only in the city centers, the countryside were still the middle eastern semitic peoples.
Greek people are deep rooted in these lands mate, for millenniums. We are one with the sea. Greeks were always predominant along the coasts of the Mediterranean and in key cities of the Byzantine Empire.
@@Theodoros_Kolokotronis define always.
Only the masters of Ancient & Medieval history can answer the question buddy. Certainly not you and me.
“Greeks were generally the largest and most influential ethnic group in both Anatolia and the Byzantine Empire, especially from the Hellenistic period onward.
By the time of the Byzantine Empire, Greeks were the predominant ethnic group in the urban and administrative centers, particularly in Constantinople and other key cities. Greek became the official language in the Empire under Emperor Heraclius in the 7th century. This cemented the cultural dominance of Greek-speaking populations, especially in Asia Minor (Anatolia), which was a vital part of the empire. Many influential figures, such as Byzantine Emperors and Military Commanders, came from Greek-speaking regions”.
Arnold J. Toynbee, prominent English Historian-Byzantinist, excerpt from his monumental series of books “A Study of History”.
@Theodoros_Kolokotronis okay😂
Excellent video.
Vraiment sympa votre vidéo
Même si j'ai une question -45 un etat sous "influence romaine' est apparu en Syrie dans votre animation carte c'est quel le nom de royaume ou autre ? Si je me troumpe pas
Je croyais que ce territoire etait en contrôle (une province impériale )importante par rome -64
Merci
Emesene dynasty it is.
@@Anwwoo merci pour votre réponse
great work thank you
Historically, Pontus was the last roman state because of the dynasty, Tocco wasn't a roman dynasty
There was no Pontus, it was called Empire of Trebizond. And the last one was the principality of theodoro
Soo cool
While Rome's hostility to Turks dated back to late antiquity particularly against Tengrist Oghuric entities like the Bulgars, Avars, Huns, the arrival of Seljuks marked the begin of a new front against a distinct Muslim powerhouse conquering their way into Anatolia
avenge manzikert....
8:24 The Visigoths were in Thebes at the time, about to sack Athens, I also believe Tanukhi and Sahli were more prominent then the Ghassanids
와 진짜 높은 수준의 역사에 머리를 탁치고 갑니다 혹시 고려의 역사 재업 가능하실까요? 고려 혜종의 재위기간같이 오류도 보이고 해서요ㅎㅎ
시간 많을 때, 함 시도해보도록 하죠.
Are the borders of the Germanic and gallic tribes correct?
borders weren't a real thing back then. So they necessarily can't be correct. View them as general, fluctuating, soft boundaries of where some settlements of one tribe most likely stopped and where, gradually, those of another tribe began
there is a few mistake about the date . there is a big information source in book about ottoman in that century . Âşıkpaşazâde history book written in 14 century about the ottoman first year . this is the oldest aviable source . but there is one more oldest one . its yahsi fakih . but its not exist . Âşıkpaşazâde history book is telling us about this book
L evento più importante accaduto durante la Civiltà Romana è stato quando in una Provincia lontana da Roma, in un piccolo villaggio, una ragazza di 16 anni ha dato alla luce un bambino. La fanciulla si chiamava Maria.
The Dacians were subdued not vassalized by Trajan
저 공격 드랍되는 효과음 때문에 집중이 안되오,.,.
Official declaration of Europeans towards South Koreans :
If you map the Roman Empire blue again, it's war.
Video is very accurate though !
그러고보니 1142년에 사진이 요안네스 2세에서 마누일 1세 대제로 안바뀌는 오류가있네요
Impressive
Next chapter: Spanish Empire (Imperio español / Monarquía hispánica) 1402 (Conquest of Canary Islands) 1492 (Fall Granada/America) War of 80 years until Independences of Spanish American Viceroyalties (great civil war) and last territories (1861-1976)
5:26 브금 짤린듯
Bro couldnt find a Diocleatian pic
Wow!!
모든 길은 로마로 통한다
❤0:08
Romans are Italy or Greece or Türkiye regardless of religion
I'd probably argue that the Ottoman Beylik and Empire (and, by extension, the country of Turkey) were/are continuations of the Eastern Roman Empire, although Turkified and Islamized. They ruled over many of the same lands and same people, after all, and much Roman knowledge probably passed from the Romans to the Turks.
There was already an early Turkified "Roman" entity called the Sultanate of Rum before the Ottomans rose in earnest (note the name?)
If my argument holds any merit, then one might argue that the "Roman" empire didn't fall until the 1920s, and even then one might argue that it lives on in the Turkish Republic.
@@Rickyrab 👁️👄👁️
No
Turks aren't Ronan.
In. Credible.
There was no Judea in any book of Greek or Roman or Egyptian or Babylonian or Assyrian historians before the coming of a person who divided the dating into BC and AD.. . The Roman Empire called the area you spelled "Judea" Palestine
Chamou de provincia da Judeia. O nome Palestina foi dada pelos invasores Árabes.
Palestinian be creating their own history we wuz jewish desert jinggers
The HRE really should be included in these sorts of videos. Otto the Great, Otto III, Frederick Barbarossa, and Frederick II were as much Western Caesars as ANY of the heirs of Constantine.
Barbarians claiming to be rome, pretty much as the turks do
There are few incorrect things in balkans I saw.
Hvar and Brač were part of Neretva/Paganija what is described in DAI,
Istria at the end of 8th century has been conquered by Francia , not Croatia
after Ljutovid of Zahumlje ruled aswell in Serbia(Bosnia and Rascia) not only Zahumlje en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ljutovid_of_Zahumlje ,
for some reason on map Duklja after battle of Bar is presented without Duklja itself,
city of Ras was byzantine from 11th century up to 1127 when serbs captured it,
I can mention more altrough I don't see reason. Overall I can say that video nicely focused on other details like people, events etc presenting something that most of mapping video don't do. Main minus is see are borders in middle ages, I don't know so much about ancient period but middle ages seems to be in many parts done by tracing other videos and it sometimes hurts when there are more and less detailed borders next to each other on the same map only because videos have different amount of accuracy. Anyway I see progress compering older videos and I appreciate research done for additional informations in the dox and on ancient period