The History of Mexico in 16 Minutes
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 พ.ค. 2024
- The History of Mexico in 16 Minutes
The history of Mexico, similar to its upper neighbor of the United States, includes a significant period of colonization followed by a war for independence. After the Spaniards toppled the Aztec Empire in the 16th century, their influence spread throughout the region until the Napoleonic occupation of Spain complicated matters in the 1800s. A rebellion was inevitable as the Mexican people grew tired of their overbearing colonizers and finally reached their limit.
♦Consider supporting our work:
/ @knowledgia
♦Consider supporting us on Patreon :
/ knowledgia
♦Please consider to SUBSCRIBE: goo.gl/YJNqek
♦Our general knowledge channel: / @masteringknowledge
♦Music by Epidemic Sound
♦Script & Research :
Skylar J. Gordon
#History #Documentary
You can help us making more and better videos by Becoming a TH-cam Member! Each membership helps us a lot in the creation process.
🚩 By doing so, you will be the first to see videos, and parts of production and vote on topics :
th-cam.com/channels/uCuEKq1xuRA0dFQj1qg9-Q.htmljoin
🚩 You can also support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/Knowledgia
5:37 nah men you lost me for good... you just cant just say stuff like "this person bravely murder that other person" especially when talking about genocide, massacre of innocents and slavery. For being called Knowwedgia, it seems there is a LOT of stuff you dont seem to know. History youtube channels should be better, you cant give yourself the luxury of not knowing this, as these days these channels are replacing tv documentaries and books
PS: l have to say, the way you butchered the Spanish,Aztecs and Mexican names its disgusting... next time use google translate and hear the pronunciations, is not that hard you know?
This video missed the history of French trying to invade Mexico in the 1860's. History incomplete.
Also the War of Cristero's. When the Mexican Government declare war on the Mexican Catholic church. Incomplete history.
@@eleazarmartinez5218 No he didn't. He mentioned the French occupation and being expelled in the latter part of the 1860's. The French were a minor part. The focus was on the Spanish participation, since it was part of the Spanish Empire.
@@robertkarp2070 lived in the country. Telling me I don't know my history 🤔
I can't even begin to tell the inaccuracies this video tells, it is so wrong, Moctezuma never tought Cortez was a God, in fact he told them to leave but Cortez pushed forward, Mexico was never colonized, it was in fact part of the Spanish empire, it wasn't a colony, the war for independance was in fact a war against the french imposed ruler and it was a war supporting the restoration of the original spanish monarchy, in the end the much weakened spanish spanish empire had so little power over new spain that it ended up becoming independent thanks to people that saw the opportunity to create a new mexican epire, wich ended up in the country of Mexico.
Dude yes you got it down ✔️
👏👏👏👏
Obviously, no one with a professional knowledge of the actual history of Mexico was involved in the creation of this worthless content.
It is interesting to see how Spain first supported US independence and then lost its American empire thanks to the USA and its allies, the British.
@@alarhuwhy are you even in the comment section of such a video if you hate it so much?
@@Flugs0because it’s all lies. It like me lying about you, would you just be cool with it?
The Aztecs didn't call themselves Aztecs. They called themselves 'the machika'. That is why it is called 'Mexico' today (a latinization of 'Machika').
The called themselves Mexicas (meshikas)
I remember reading that.
What's with the parrot?
Wasnt it actually a different tribe, not the azteca themselves? A tribe called mexica who helped the spaniards to defeat the azteca empire?
@@stanislavkocur3408no, those were the tlaxcaltecas. Mexicas are how they called themselves, aztecs was invented later by foreign explorers
Completely forgets the thousands of native alias who actually took down the Mexicas (not Aztecs)
6:03 - 6:19 ; 1:53 they mentioned those said allies once, then around the 3:51 minute mark they mentioned the Tlaxcala but didn't really emphasize their impact.
I mean tbf most of their videos are less than 20 minutes but still makes it seems insignificant.
Also 4:56 debatable I mean the Aztecs fought for slaves, they would capture their enemies alive and were built to travel on foot. The Conquistadors did have horses and superior weaponry, doesn't mean that they fought the same as Aztecs, they fought to kill and one fought for capture
Mexihcah, not Mexicas.
@@Onlinerandoclose enough xd 😮💨
@@mischievousjr.9299to be fair small pox too did a bunch of it to actually take tenochitilan
3:37 fun fact, in Mexico City, the tree where Hernan Cortez cried under is still there, the event is also referred to “La Noche Victoriosa” “The Victorious Night”
esta en Oaxaca ese árbol.
A statement made is wrong: Cortes never conquered Mexico since Mexico did not exist at that time, just the Aztec empire which had been occupying the central valley for hardly 200 years while severely oppressing all the tribes they could. We could say Mexico was born with its independence.
Agreed. Would it be fair to say he conquered the Mexica (Culhua-Mexica)?
@@Bryan_Koalayes Mexico is a young country.
Exactly
@@Bryan_Koala That'd be a more accurate historical fact. Side note, truly interesting the dynamics between those two groups.
Thats not the only thing that the video got wrong….
I'm sorry. I've been a fan of your channel for a while, but this video was just poorly made. A lot of important stuff was just not talked about. I understand it's difficult to make a short video talking about the entire history of a country. Maybe you should make videos on smaller topics of the history of Mexico to make it justice.
4:30 correction: the battle of otumba was before the retreat to tlaxcala, not afterwards.
Some things are subjectively vague and misleading here. But I guess it's fine as an introduction for Americans. However a fundamental difference between the English and the Spanish In Terms of colonization that everyone should know: is that originally the Spanish Queen Isabella the Catholic ordered from start to Columbus that any native found in the new territory was to be treated as a subject of the crown and not a slave, thus the heavy Jesuit work with the natives, this had a long lasting effect, because the focus at the beginning was of integration. Not of extermination. This is why the largest part of the current Mexican population in Mexico is still brown. We were considered from the beginning, the Jesuit and other Catholic orders went in fact to such lengths and endeavours to learn and preserve the history and language of the Mesoamerican people, founding the very first University in the entire American continent that had in its first subjects the study of native languages. In contrast to the English and then American politics with the natives, mostly of extermination and then as tools in war.
To be honest, I do feel a bit bad about Spain, they were once on top of the world, but with a little royal inbreeding and some bad Napoleonic luck they began their downfall and bad luck against the English. In fact most of the bad reputation of Spain was originally spread by the English in colonial times, and then by the Americans in the times of their Spanish-American war. Spain just lost it all and are forced to live today with a similar shame akin of the german people regarding their past ww2 History . And I say this as a brown Mexican.
The losers have no right to complain. As for the behavior of the Anglos, you don’t need to look at the United States. Just look at Israel today. Let alone people of color, brothers who are exactly the same are isolated and exterminated. If you continue to lose, you will end up with dinosaurs. Of course, this is also God's will, you have nothing to complain about, repent to pay for your sins, and sometimes die to atone for your sins
Spain is the mercenary and agent of the Anglos. They have ambitions when they become big. Otherwise, why would Spain resist the Muslim empire? It is not the aid of the Nordic countries. Spain is the Turks of Asia. They started as mercenaries and slowly gradually It began to become independent and expand, but the Turks succeeded, and Spain failed somewhat. After all, the mercenaries were not completely powerful. They were always in a state of instability, and it was very difficult to succeed.
When you pull off the turbans of Mediterranean Arabs, you will find a Spaniard. Spain is the agent instigated by the Anglo. In the past, Spain could be instigated by the Anglo, and it will be instigated by other forces in the future. The mercenary nation has no secular stance. Act only in accordance with God’s inspiration
Not saying America doesn't have its sins. Our history is rife with genocide, slavery, and greed. But ...
The Spanish brought Smallpox. Spaniards can point the finger at English and Americans all they want and say how bad we were. The Spanish either intentionally or unintentionally killed more Natives than English and Americans combined. Jamestown was able to settle on plowed land because the Natives had already been wiped out by Spanish Smallpox, which was proven by Anthropologists despite lots of rebuke and criticism from Hispanic peers.
Then there's Cortes, Coronado, Pizarro, and Columbus. All four caused mass destruction and death of Native American civilizations.
Columbus also kick started the American slave trade.
Spanish priests with the mission system aggroed a lot of Natives by telling them they had to learn Spanish, had to become Catholic, and had to learn how to farm. Natives never wanted that. As a result, the Comanche and Apache especially turned hostile against the Spanish. That hostility was taught to their children and shown to the Mexicans. The Grandkids and Great-Grandkids then showed that same hostility to Texans. The priests recognizing this could have made different choices, but didn't. Their arrogance allowed for unnecessary hostility. And yes, white Anglos were no better. But it didn't have to be that way.
Thank you for the art work
You spent nearly the whole video talking about Mexico's history before independence. That's like making a "summary of World War Two" video but talking entirely about WW1 and the interwar years
Well the interwar period is a part of history not many people know about, so its useful to explain it. Because most people know what happened in WW2.
@@BuckClucks you missed the point. This video was a "history of Mexico" but only talked about Mexico before their independence. I compared it to WW2 to make a point that flew right over your head
This is an extremely so fascinating history of Mexico which is one of my favourite nations ever even though,they lost the territories of Texas and California to United States,good friends!!!LONG LIVE MEXICO!!! 🇲🇽
It's a fascinating location, the place where the two hemispheres truly collided. Then Mexico City became the first international city in The Americas, Mexico historical weight is amongst the top, Viva Mexico!
@@Dr.House92 You are extremely ever right and viva Mexico,good friend!!!🏋️♂️
It’s ok, every one losses wars… when USA annexed Cali, Texas etc etc that day they became 1/4 Mexican, as much as they don’t want to say or admit it Anglo Saxon American became a little bit Mexican after the war… look at the people that live within the border states? How many Mexicans have mixed with the Americans in those border states? Since the 1990s USA has assimilated Mexican culture/cuisine as it being part of USA 🇺🇸 🇲🇽
Its so strange to me that people call America the United States when Mexico is also called los estados unidos mexicanos .. strange new phenomenon that started not that long ago .
They forgot to mentioned
Pancho Villa and Zapata.
Unimportant that’s why.
Epic and can you do history of Jamaica please
Great video but as a Mexican I noticed mistakes:
1.-Juan o donuju signed the treaty of independence in September 27th
2.- Texas was nota country since you need a recognition but imdefacto terms it was
Also the border with Arizona
Totally skipped over the Cinco de Mayo part and Benito Juarez
Morelos died before Guerrero and Iturbide compromised for independence though, that's not really made clear here. Also wish there had been more recently history. The 20th century Mexican history is probably their most interesting period. Otherwise, not a bad vid at all :)
the govt of mexico has always been trash and more trash a pathetic history
In the first map you show you seem to be designating as New Spain the viceroyalties of New Spain, New Granada and Peru.
Wait, Cortés didn't arrive in Tabasco, he landed and founded the city of Veracruz, the oldest continental city built by Europeans.
This such a disappointing video from a Chanel that usually makes so good content. Very poorly summary of 500 years. And it’s was so posed to be about Mexico, yet most of actually Mexican (that is independent Mexico) conflicts and wars were not even mentioned.
What a shame
My grandpa came to the US from Mexico my last name is Aleman Spanish for German.
5:15 Salamanca family bloodline 500 years ago and eventually leading up to the Salamanca family in Breaking Bad/Better Call Saul.
Always love history especially when the new world was being explored
good job
One Aztec described the Spanish "They are not male nor female but something in between."
Well Done
Thank you from México. ❤
Thank you too!
I think brazil or argentina could be a cool subject
Nah
Wow this video ignores a lot of history. One of the big ones in recent Mexico history is the cartels and how they affected criminal justice, culture, music, journalism, world relations, and economics in Mexico. Not even mentioning that is wrong. What about Pancho Villa? The dude regime changed the government. Giving a brief mention is crazy given how much history that changed forever. The Mexican American War? America gets to Mexico City, but let's not show that at all. Geez ... I guess as a history teacher I expect too much.
Man just glossed over the cristero war
The Mexican Empire should have never fallen.
we never would have had GTA V without california
i wish it had survived and had asked the duke of moctezuma to take the thrown ( count at the time )
@@marusdod3685a sacrifice worth making.
@@m.j.vazquez4720The Throne of Mexico should be someone descended from both the Moctezuma’s and the Habsburgos
I quite like this channel, but in this case I see a few historical mistakes: New Spain Viceroyalty did not reach down to Perú (Come on!). Many of today's Central American countries were counquered even decades after, e.g. Costa Rica was finally conquered in the 1560's. At least, I do really appreciate this video does not leverage on the worng historical interpreation that all Central American joined the "´puppet" 1st mexican "empire".
Napoleon Bonaparte helped USA, and Mexico in their Wars for Independence by opening front's on their occupiers home turfs. Interesting
Napoleon was all about Nationalism after all.
France really helped out the decolonization of the Americas. They were a main reason the US got independence. Napoleon REALLY helped the US and Mexico, he sold a lot of territory to the US, and kept the British too busy to plan an attack on the Americans, and his distraction of Spain resulted in independence movements being majorly furthered. The US pushed for Canadian independence, which could be a long stretch to France helping Canada gain independence too.
Napoleon was 7 when the US Declaration of Independence was signed.
@@bsrpython257 Napoleon Dynamite maybe?
@@bsrpython257 True, but when he grew up and caused a lot of distraction and turmoil in Europe, the UK had 0 initiative to fight the US, partially because of how busy it was with France and Napoleon. The war of 1812 might have gone worse for the US if the UK wasn't busy fighting Napoleon, for example. The US also expanded because of the Louisiana purchase from Napoleon, which may have fueled manifest destiny.
Who's watching this in 2024? Raise your hand 🙋
Nah I'm watching in 2035 USA had a 2nd Civil War and Mexico now owns Texas 😅😂😂
I love how you spent more time talking about the Conquista and Napoleon in Spain than independent Mexico, completely glossing over key parts of Mexican history such as the Reform War and the PRI; as well as barely mentioning others like the Porfiriato and the Mexican Revolution. I'm sorry, but this isn't a good video on Mexican history at all, it's barely serviceable as an introduction.
14:59 you forgot to include the Gadsden Purchase of 1853.
Today Mexican Fighters in Combat Sports are among the most respected in the World. Modern Warrior Culture.
The strongest Indians survived and the Spanish that came just won the reconquista its a Warriors mix. Respect from New Mexico, kickapoo, Comanche, Apache and Spanish. 🇺🇸🇲🇽
California, Nevada, Arizona and New Mexico’s Mami’s history
They did not think Spaniard was a god, just not true.
Our history as a nation/civilization is nothing like that of our northern neighbor. No serious historian would ever claim that.
Sadly the mexican empire never deserved to exist in the first place due to disunity, lack of government direction, corruption, betrayal and enemies within their own country. There is a mexican exclusive saying, 'A mexicans worst enemy is another mexican'. I agree 100% when I migrated and lived in Mexico for a couple of years there.
Totalmente de acuerdo, nuestra historia no es similar en absoluto a la de Estados Unidos, ese tipo dice puros disparates, pésimo vídeo.
@@Trancymindfueron los mismos gringos quienes conspiraron para derrocar el Imperio ellos no querían monarquías en el continente, deberías leer más.
@@TrancymindNot true. Mexico would not be able to be what it is if it was so horrible. A G20 and OECD member country and 13th richest in the world of 195 countries. Just keep those views to yourself
@@S.M.Mer013th richest country in the world and yet still not a first world country whatsoever. How do we know? When you see millions of them crossing illegally to the US for better opportunities. That's how. I lived in Mexico for 3 years as a foreigner and weighed only 40 pounds as a 10 year old boy when finally my mother had enough living there and we decided to leave my mexican father and his country for good in secret. We never looked back ever since 34 years ago.
Do Australia next
Its way too short
Do Central America History!!!!
Can you do Canada next?
Scoot scoot!
Oh Canada has such an interesting history. It's on our list!
Make sure you reference the song plz, "there's no Canada like French Canada" plz
@@Knowledgia Thank You! I'm from Canada, so i'd really appreciate if you did make a video on it!
Poor Mexico feels bad 😢
Surprised you never mentioned Maximillian I and the Second Mexican Empire. Even today he is still celebrated in Mexico.
Celebrated?
@@Gabriel_452 Yeah, mostly because he really cared about Mexico. It's shame that he was just a pawn in France's colonial aspirations.
Based
Correction, in the Hispanoamerican countries that revolted were lead by a small creole elite who wanted to use the opportunity to gain more power, in fact the most loyalists were the native americans and mestizo populations
I AM SO EARLY!
The Mexica never beloved Cortez was a god 🤦🏽♂️ that’s been disproven a long time ago.
I would not add anything before conquest to the history of Mexico. That was not Mexico. Even the times in which the land was under Spanish rule, it was not Mexico. Mexico exists since it became a nation.
Ok, but that would like teaching US history and not talking about the people who settled in the Americas first, or what life was like living under British rule, or teaching why the Americans rebelled. You need to know the history of the country before it was founded to know why it was founded.
@@BuckClucks
Why would 1st nations ppl revolt aganist the brittish crown?- yeah you dont need that. Well he did a poor job of differentiating between New Spain and the instantaneous s#it Mexico...
Um they were not Spanish Colonies. They were viewed as Spanish vireinatos. Very different.
I'm a big fan of history videos, and this one was definitely one of the best I've seen. The narration was clear and engaging, and the visuals were stunning. I highly recommend this video to anyone interested in learning more about Mexican history.
Did this guy just say 250 Spaniards took over the entire Aztec empire? Find it hard to believe
0:28 most of those who fought against the Spanish were descendents of the colonizers themselves so not even half a minute and there is a mistake
Viva la revolucion!!!
Napoleon´s France was catholic as was Spain.
The Reason why France invaded Mexico was because Russia sent their Navy to San Francisco and New York when England and France were just about to enter the war on the side of the Confederates since London created the Confederates. France was already in Mexico making a spear head movement to resupply the Confederates and to open up a Pacific Theatre and to create a port in California. England already amassed 11,000 troops and growing stationed at their Northern Confederacies border now called Canada ready to open a Northern Theatre to divert Union troops away from their Southern Confederacy then to attack The Unions naval blockade. The Union would have been completely destroyed and annexed by those two great powers leaving the Confederates to exist as either a puppet state of London or to be fully brought back into the fold of the British Empire.
London was already courting (threatening/bribing) other countries to get involved like Spain while Russia was in talks with Prussia to ally with incase London was to intervene.
Seeing all of this Tsar Alexander II wrote a letter to Queen Victoria saying “If you enter in this war it will be a casus belli for all out war with the Russian Empire”. The stage was set for the 1st World War and Russia stopped it.
There is also a memorial in San Francisco for the
hundreds of Russian sailors who came off their Asiatic fleet ships that died while helping the city put out a fire that threatened to lay waste to it during the War.
The Russian fleet also threatened to Shell Australian ports along with other British Pacific Colonies if Britain aided the Confederates. A confederate war ship spent a lot of time in Australian waters and was supported by the Australian public, some even signing on as crew members. This Confederate war ship laid waist to the US Pacific whaling fleet and is reported to have fired the last shot in the war
Russia also helped Thailand (Kingdom of Siam) maintain its sovereignty from being completely Partitioned/Annexed from the British and French around the same time. The very word Thai (ไทย) means 'free man' in the Thai language which is partially to thank to the Russians as they might have ended up being a colony or part of another country/colony if not for their intervention.
@@JPJ432 I believe you are referencing the CSS Shenandoah. It surrendered at Liverpool, England oddly enough. Very interesting story.
@@howiehall4622 I apologize I did not word it right. Russia was the reason why France stopped at the border and did not progress not why they invaded. France invaded Mexico in 61 while Russia sent their navy during the unions most desperate time of the war which was 63.
@@howiehall4622 Also for a little more Context: The British (City of London) are the ones who created our divide in the first place to put brother against brother. After the war Lincoln wanted to rebuild the South and had plans to do so. He and half his Cabinet were assassinated by London. Many of the others that survived had multiple assassination attempts on them especially William Seward who had around a dozen or so, a few almost killing him. Most of the Confederate Operations for the Civil War and post war plans and assassinations were made in London and then sent to Montreal a hub for spies and intel in the Americas for the British Empire then passed through to Confederate President Jefferson Davis to follow the orders. Many of the South's own leaders were selling out the South to British interest even General Lee. Unfortunately London had many of their Tentacles and Webs on both sides. Lincoln stated that the Department Of State is completely controlled by British Interest that he had to constantly fight against. It was in the 1870s that a Paradigm Shift happened were the British took control within the Reunited States through subversion (which was easier to do now as their agents were brought back into the Union and many of their opponents assassinated) and have had it all the way up to this day. Some presidents fought against it like Garfield, McKinley, Harding, Roosevelt, and Kennedy and all were killed.
You did Gran Colombia before
Can you do the rest of Latino America?
Especially Brazil as the French and Dutch tried to take it over.
I love this channel but this is such Anglo/ protestant way of telling Mexico's history! Clearly leaning into the Black legend!! Leaving a lot out to Demonize the Spanish..
This is a bit inaccurate but overall it’s a good summary. There are some important events that were skipped over and a bit of the details were inaccurate. Also , the Aztecs did not believe Hernan was a god..lol
Wonder what woulda happened if everyone left everyone alone. We either would all been mixed or all become the true forms of our race😭😭
The Spanish didn’t have colonies, they had viceroyalties and kingdoms. The English had colonies
Not at all surprising that The History of Mexico includes Napoleon.
Yes Spain's dominion over Vice Royalty of New Spain was questioned after Napoleon and his army defeated Spain's very expensive army.
That was Gonzalo de Sandoval not Pablo.
Mexico had a big debt with Spain France and England when Benito Juarez became president settled the debt but France wanted to dominate Mexico and it didn't invaded once but twice due to that exhausting war between France and Spain US found an opportunity to provoked under James Polk another war which caused Mexico to loose their terretories from California all the way through Wyoming but of course most of the history books won't mention that since it's an embarrassment to the US
President Santa Anas big ego is what triggered to lose mexican territory in the first place as well as the massacres towards the americans in Texas. Santa Ana was also a pedophile who would marry a 16 year old rich girl while he was in his 50's in order to get more money for himself for power. To this day, mexicans hate Santa Ana way more than Polk. Santa Ana betrayed Spain as well as Mexico. No wonder he died in poverty in Cuba in exile while the mexicans burned down Santa Anas museum that had his amputated arm skeleton on display in Mexico City.
15:49 / 15:57
Everyone should thank the texans for the West. The worst decision by Mexico was renting out that land, but it was perfect timing for the united States as mexico was going through transitions of power.
I always wonderd if these men ever felt bad doing shit.
oh you made several mistakes minutes away from your video, I have to sleep but I will com back to edit this comment, new spain was never a colony, it was a viceroyalry, far different from a mere colony.
Ah yes. Americans condemn chinas annexation of tibet. But annexed new mexico,, texas and california good shit.
Mexico started the war and those are were deserted
@@talitali48 lol mexico started the war 🤣 uncle sam's propaganda. So if someone started a war we justify taking their original territory? Just like how the 13 colonied got into native american lands?
@@talitali48wow, having unoccupied territory is an invitation to be stolen. 😃
This is different. The expansion of civilization is allowed by God, while the expansion of barbarism is a crime. If the cannibals conquer you in turn, you will definitely not want to. You will naturally expect and welcome the entry of advanced civilization.
Today, not only Mexicans, but all South Americans are entering the United States, even if they are illegal immigrants. On the other hand, Americans will not illegally enter other countries as illegal immigrants. Do you see the difference in civilization? Who is civilized and who is? How clear is barbarism
They just skipped over Benito Juerez like he never existed😂
Porfirio Diaz won the war against the French because the Americans send an army to Mexico and defeated together.
Some bits were biased and much was omitted even for a video of this lenght, 8/10 summary not crappy not good either
It’s was 200 years later n the ppl still didn’t have a grasp of Mexico yet lol
Not hating, but in the last minute or so, the border of America and Mexico is incorrect. Love you videos ❤
Este video tiene demasiados errores...
Uno de ellos recae en el Cura Morelos, pues este jamas se "alio" con el en ese entonces Comandante Realista Agustin de Iturbide.
De hecho, creo que nunca interactuaron de frente, mas haya de las veces que lucharon entre si. (Una de ellas desenboco en que Iturbide hiciera que el ejercito de Morelos se disparada entre si, cuando Morelos intento tomar Valladolid, el cual se transformo en lo que ahora se conoce como Morelia, y que Morelos como Itrubide nacieron ahi)
Iturbide de unio a la causa independentista hasta ya su finalizacion (Pues fue este quien hizo que el recien Virrey firamda los tratados de Cordoba)
El plan de iguala en el video se dice que fue planeado por Vicente y Agustin, cuando esto es erroneo.
Agustin ya tenia el "plan de iguala" cuando decidio unirse a Vicente, pues este estaba siendo escrito cuando la "Guera" Rodrigues tento a Iturbide a formar a formar una nueva nacion, asi que la participación de Vicente en el plan fue solo en la practica.
Tambien se pasan detalles del territorio del "primer" imperio, pues falta la zona que compone actualmente los paises de Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua y Puerto Rico.
El como realmente fue que Agustin deserto la corona de Mexico tras verse obligado a tomarla, pues el congreso constituynte del momento conspiraba contra el y la influencia de extranjeros como lo es Robert Poinsett y la masoneria hicieron que personas como el mencionado Antonio Lopez De Santa Anna se "revelaran"
Aunque con Santa Anna tambien fue en parte del labado de cabeza que le dieron los masones, tambien se puede intuir que fue una desicion personal por rencor, pues Agustin ya como emperador si mal no recuerdo, nego que el General Santa Anna se involucrada con su Hermana Mayor.
No se sabe muy bien el por que el interes repentino de Santa Anna por la "Princesa de iturbide", pero se piensa que fue para obtener un estatus de nobleza y asi obtener cierto poder e influencia politica.
Tambien en el video erra en lo de la igualdad de poblacion en el imperio, pues este en el plan de iguala y lo que se podria considerar la primera constitucion de Mexico, en uno de sus apartados dice "Establecer la union de todas las clases sociales", donde se imponia la igualdad social sin importar su origen etnico, seas español, seas americano, seas africano y asi.
Mismo por el cual Vicente Guerrero decidio unirse a Itrubide, pues se buscaba la igualdad en la poblacion, y asi formaron el ejercito trigarante.
Yo I’m Mexican American ty
Mexican Americaaaans... Don't just like getting into gangs fiiiights.. They like flowers, and music, and white girls named Debi too oo oo
-Cheech
💪🏼🇲🇽🇺🇸🏋🏻♂️
Big Trinidad 🇹🇹
As a native Mexican and anthropologist (who specializes in Mesoamerica)…this video is physically painful to watch.
If I had 2 hours to spare, I’d sit here and itemize every single inaccurate bit of information.
Suffice to say- if you watch this video, please view it as strictly “entertainment” and not as “historically accurate”.
❤😂
1%❤❤❤
Can you make a second channel dedicated to alternate history and/or fantasy series
“Enslaved the native people” is not even close to accurate wth? This is why these videos should be made by Hispanics
That’s crazier than americas story😂 Americans had to deal w them cannons n shit tho n the way they fought was so bad😂everyone in front just died
Well, taking historical accuracy lessons from a Smithsonian point of view, in order to deter , a Thing call “ manifestation of destiny” is another coin, but one thing I can say, Spanish were like todays modern day Mexicans in most ways, really not too different in caliber, Spanish and Spanish/white Mexicans are just distant relatives from the history of Cortes V Montezuma; conquest, but there are the 1% ERS in Spain who claims 100% Spanish bloodline vice versa with Mexicas/Nautl in Mexico . Thus leaving mestizos in the middle of zealous bigotry .
6:45 This video is so inaccurate. You forgot to mention the African slaves the Spanish brought from Africa to Mexico. 5000 African slaves came to Mexico and you forgot to mention Mexico’s black president Vicente Guerrero.
Yep. They were brought over to Veracruz
@@Thehabanero_ my best friend Javier is an Afro Mexican. Born and raised. When Americans hear him speak it shocks them because they’re not used to seeing by someone who’s black from Mexico.
@@icecreambeats101 I believe it. My family and I also have some African ancestry who are from that region.
No, no, no, Hidalgo didn't attempt to flee into the "United States," he retreated north towards New Spain's sparsely populated northern territories which still hadn't been invaded and stolen by the United States. Don't whitewash your country's imperialism gringo! LOL
Cortes never conquered México, This territory was a vice kingdom, not a colony.
It doesn’t matter what it was because either way lots of oppression and atrocities happened with in that territory. That’s the end of it
🖕🏼🖕🏼🫵🏼🤣😂🇲🇽
@@KrazyMexikan revientas de p... la neta
the fact that it's called "the night of sorrows" it's ridiculous.
Only to you. Mexico’s people are also descendants of Spaniards, so we can call it either
Man comemos muchos tacos
😃
I can't belive that such imperys like Astecs and Inka were so stupid!!!
Is because what was said here isn't true haha
did Mexico have history before Europeans?
no because it didn’t exist
@@Haz401 that is a proper child's reply thank you.
@@24underground7 no problem glad you learned something today
@@Haz401 perhaps its you that needs some learning.......
Yes, a very rich history full of culture. Before Mexico, that region was called The Viceroyalty of New Spain, before that it was just a mix of different tribes into one Empire. Before the empire it was filled with same and maybe more tribes. olmeca people are the very first people to be known living in meso American.
Most of the stone tablets and realistically any trace of Times before the olmeca have been buried by the dense jungle. However for the Aztec Empire history, most of the information that was recorded was destroyed by Spain. Hell even the Pyramids that the Aztecs discovered and built were torn apart and remade into Catholic churches.
There's a video that explains which pyramids were dismantled brick by brick and used to rebuild a Church
España llevo Universidades, hospitales, religión. Cosa que no hicieron el resto de los imperios como el inglés, que donde iban....arrasaban
Si bien esto es cierto hasta cierto punto, se debió a que la clase media baja y la clase media alta querían ascender a la alta nobleza. Estos residentes españoles sólo permitían que los españoles asistieran a estas universidades, no como permitían que asistieran los indígenas. Also
@@mischievousjr.9299 aún así.....el imperio británico o el francés fueron muchísimo más crueles y supremacistas que el español. España mezclaba, Inglaterra arrasaba
Sonoma ca was Mexico
You really present a biased view of history. The Spanish were not "colonizers." That term is offensive and pejorative for white people from Hispanic America, from whom almost all of Mexico are descended. And Mexico was not a colony; 80% of the resources stayed in Mexico to create universities, cities, cathedrals, hospitals (all accessible to Spaniards and Indians).
12:20 You mistakenly mention that the most conservative sector revolted and with it Iturbide, who opposed equal rights, which is false and in Spain there was never a precise inequality. Since the Laws of Burgos, the Indians were recognized as Free Vassals of the Spanish Crown.
These errors do not surprise me coming from an Anglo-Saxon, who spread the Black Legend of Spain.
Mutt country Mutt War
A lot here is wrong or omitted
i wonder if the ereegion would be better or worse if the British made it their first and met the aztecs etc over the spanish
worse full of masons and heretics
the british would certainly commit genocide on the population, just like in the US
Judging from what happened in UK control lands, like the Aussie aboriginals, Irish famine, and the USA natives. Do you want more or less brown ppl in the Yucatan?
Worse. It would have been like South Africa with a centuries long apartheid.
@antonexx with exception of perhaps the aboriginals in Australia , the rest there are now more people of Irish, native American, Indian descendancy etc than ever before.