For anybody wondering why he just shot her without a care. Its because she had a hand in one of his comrades death. They had a previous encounter where she lost control of her horse and he tried to help bring the horse to heel which he did. But one of her compatriot got butt hurt of why this commoner(he was in disguise) dare lift his head in front them, pulls a sword to kill him but his friend jumped in to take the sword. Fast forward to now and you have this women showing off her riding skill which is pretty much an insult to his fallen friend. Had she been such a great rider his friend would still be alive. So bang!!!
Well, at least she isn't stupid. She know she could died. But she took the chance anyways. Taro, the man who kill his friend was also a stupid. His father Shingen paid the compensation for his friend death, and he even apologized with own mouth.
Everybody says that, but basically she did nothing back in that scene. Her horse got out of control and she tried just to control it. Actually, it's the son of Takeda Shingen who cut down Uesugi's retainer in that scene. The *real reason* is that she provokes her enemies by stepping in the river (the Sai river I assume). She goes beyond her part of the river and she is sent to the sanzu river (the japanese styx) by Kenshin. Simply.
It wasn't actually Lady Yae fault his friend died, Taro was the one who actually kill him. In the original edition, Takeda Shingen actually verbally apologized after he threw the gold.
@@brendanzhang7488 No but it can extend/better the life of someone temporally. Its ofc not enough for the cost of someone's life nor does really matter in the end, but at least its not nothing.
This is a pretty difficult scene for anyone unfamiliar with Bushido to understand. This is not a revenge killing; Kenshin knows that Yae had no hand in his friend's death. Takeda even called the man who killed him an idiot for having done so, and thinking the men mere commoners even compensated the death. Rather, it's the director's intentional portrayal of a paradoxical act of honor that must inevitably result in senseless destruction. Lady Yae is essentially engaging in an honorable suicide. She already knows that no man will challenge her because she is a woman. Consequently, she forces a confrontation by entering the river and placing herself within range of Kenshin's arquebus. The ultimate insult to her bravery would have been to have dismissed her challenge as unworthy. But Kenshin respects her; he's the only one who doesn't laugh. And the only way he can maintain her honor is to kill her.
Dude, “Bushido” didn’t exist pre-Edo period. Realistically, if Lady Yae rode down with her vassals, Kenshin would’ve likely ordered an entire line of teppo to mow them down.
@@outsideiskrrtinsideihurt699 Well, I'm not a dude, and this is a work of dramatic filmmaking about a story that's commonly used in Japanese culture to illustrate the conflict between the traditional honor and pragmatic utility. Contemporary Japanese understand the ethic of honor through Bushido, though its tradition is much older. Lady Yae is a created character, an "onna-musha" introduced to further the story's theme. And if the period is the issue, she's somewhat anachronistically modeled on the "Jōshitai", Nakano Takeko... who was gunned down after carrying a naginata into the battlefield without permission during the Battle of Aizu at the culmination of the Boshin War in 1868 (the transition from Edo to Meiji) . There's an understood context to all of this.
@@outsideiskrrtinsideihurt699 The term bushido is a later term, yes, but the concepts within began maybe even as early as the 12th century with Minamoto no Yoritomo, first shougun of the Kamakura.
@@The_Gallowglassand no one gave shit about it. Next you will say that at some point battles looked like honorable duels 1vs1 after formal call outs. Its time to end this made up stories spreaded by bored edo period scribbler that romanticized war. Go back watching anime.
Why Kenshin killed Yae ? Because she provoked Uesugi men for a duel and went further by stepping in the river. She basically violated the natural border between the two armies and was shot for it. In the scene everyone relates to, it's Takeda's son who kills the retainer. Not Yae. If Kenshin wanted to avenge his man for that reason, he'd better have killed the son or Yae's horse.
I think you got the names wrong takeda shingen was the guy with the rifle uesugi kenshin is the husband of the female warrior that got shot Edit: After checking the flags the red one are carrying the Takeda Flag My mistake sorry
@@thrudgelmirkenshin3267 according to your logic, he should have shot the horse and not the onna bugeisha, not mention it's not even Yae who cut the vassal down. You guys totally miss the point, the symbolism and the character here. You should learn about the actual Uesugi kenshin and the sengoku period. There is much more than a petty vengeance in this scene.
Portuguese introduced matchlock arquebuses to Japan around the end of 15th century and early 16th century. so It is not a surprise to me. in fact you should give a peek into the imjin and chongyu wars when samurais invaded Korea and made heavy use of tanegashima against not so modernised Korean troops (who had cannons and rockets, which Japan lacked at that time , but surprisingly no guns, which Japan had plenty of them)
@@chakanyo2768 is not about that threating bad a woman, her choice to challenge a man kills her. Even in today wars will hapend in the same way. Any general challenged by anyone will have the same answer to give. Specialy if is a women or a low rank oficer or soldier.
I played Shogun 2. Oda Clan plays much like Red Army, swarming your enemy with cheap peasants. Takeda (Red Guys) plays more like France in Med2, relaying on heavy cavalry, and hammer and anvil tactics
I guess Takeda Shingen could not do without women while being away on campaign so he had to form this "Amazonian" cavalry guard unit to perform two duties, duel in bed and duel in the field. That said, by the medieval era, combat was purely fought by the men as armor weight increased dramatically. I mean even during the ancient era, warrior women were only for gladiatorial spectacles. Perhaps the only real example is the Amazonian warriors of the Scythians who like the Japanese, fought on mounts.
Armor weight never really weighed that much, especially when well fitted to the wearer. That part is easy for a warrior or soldier to master. The main detriment to wearing armor is the heat that builds up in the torso and head, from a cuirass and helmet. That's what really saps your endurance and your brain power, in battle.
@@The_Gallowglass Agreed. However the weight that Roman legionaries carry is no joke. At the height of empire and technology, the weight was 7 kg with the segmentata plate armor. But most of the time Romans or the medieval combatant wore full chainmail or lorica hamata that weighs 11 to 12 kg with an internal gambeson. So for a woman it's not really feasible. Given that average height of warriors at that time ranged from 5'3 to 5'7. The women are even shorter at 5' as average or lower. The Germans and the Nordic Vikings did have shieldmaidens as combatants but they are few and far between. One can assume these women are like their male compatriots having a taller than average 5'10, 5'11 as in the Viking warriors average height. The typical Danish Viking and the Viking Rus of Novgorod/Kiev was noted by the Byzantines to have an average height of 5'11. Therefore it depended on the culture and the demographics that utilized women in combat
@@ConstantineJoseph Well, then we're getting into gear they're carrying around. Roman soldiers carried a lot of weight, but they wouldn't be carrying that during a battle. That would all be taken care of by the non-combatant helpers. In the fight they'd have their armor, shield, sword, spear /pilum, assuming they're a legionary. All depends on the era, but they'd get close enough to throw their pila and all they'd have left is their sword, shield, helmet and cuirass. Late period they'd pretty much all go back to maille.
1:46 salute to these ladies for being badasses... Then again, it would've been much better if the men do the close combat fighting and the women do most of the long range like shooting arrows or firing muskets... Anyway this is just my opinion... 😊🙂
For anybody wondering why he just shot her without a care. Its because she had a hand in one of his comrades death. They had a previous encounter where she lost control of her horse and he tried to help bring the horse to heel which he did. But one of her compatriot got butt hurt of why this commoner(he was in disguise) dare lift his head in front them, pulls a sword to kill him but his friend jumped in to take the sword. Fast forward to now and you have this women showing off her riding skill which is pretty much an insult to his fallen friend. Had she been such a great rider his friend would still be alive. So bang!!!
Thanks, that context was pretty important.
Well, at least she isn't stupid. She know she could died. But she took the chance anyways. Taro, the man who kill his friend was also a stupid. His father Shingen paid the compensation for his friend death, and he even apologized with own mouth.
After that scene, I heard the Takeda retreat believing it to be bad luck. One Takeda retainer went and graduated Kenshin for his markmenship.
She's an enemy soldier and this is war, that should be more than enough context and justification to shoot her
Everybody says that, but basically she did nothing back in that scene. Her horse got out of control and she tried just to control it. Actually, it's the son of Takeda Shingen who cut down Uesugi's retainer in that scene. The *real reason* is that she provokes her enemies by stepping in the river (the Sai river I assume). She goes beyond her part of the river and she is sent to the sanzu river (the japanese styx) by Kenshin. Simply.
Lady Yae: I challenge any Echigo warrior to a duel!
Echigo Warrior: How bout i challenge you in bed? *Thunderous LOLs*
Kenshin: .... *Bang*
xddddd
It is a very BEAUTIFULL scene!
Congrats !!!
The scene, The color, The actors in a meaning scene!
A Masterpiece!
play sengoku games, win jidai prizes
LMAOOOOO
It wasn't actually Lady Yae fault his friend died, Taro was the one who actually kill him. In the original edition, Takeda Shingen actually verbally apologized after he threw the gold.
really doesnt matter,is the gold gonna revive kenshin friend?
@@brendanzhang7488 No but it can extend/better the life of someone temporally. Its ofc not enough for the cost of someone's life nor does really matter in the end, but at least its not nothing.
@晶水の野望 정수의 야망 Jungsu's Ambition its not about him killing her, its about how he killed her.
@晶水の野望 정수의 야망 Jungsu's Ambition not literally...
This is a pretty difficult scene for anyone unfamiliar with Bushido to understand. This is not a revenge killing; Kenshin knows that Yae had no hand in his friend's death. Takeda even called the man who killed him an idiot for having done so, and thinking the men mere commoners even compensated the death. Rather, it's the director's intentional portrayal of a paradoxical act of honor that must inevitably result in senseless destruction.
Lady Yae is essentially engaging in an honorable suicide. She already knows that no man will challenge her because she is a woman. Consequently, she forces a confrontation by entering the river and placing herself within range of Kenshin's arquebus. The ultimate insult to her bravery would have been to have dismissed her challenge as unworthy. But Kenshin respects her; he's the only one who doesn't laugh. And the only way he can maintain her honor is to kill her.
Dude, “Bushido” didn’t exist pre-Edo period. Realistically, if Lady Yae rode down with her vassals, Kenshin would’ve likely ordered an entire line of teppo to mow them down.
@@outsideiskrrtinsideihurt699 Well, I'm not a dude, and this is a work of dramatic filmmaking about a story that's commonly used in Japanese culture to illustrate the conflict between the traditional honor and pragmatic utility. Contemporary Japanese understand the ethic of honor through Bushido, though its tradition is much older. Lady Yae is a created character, an "onna-musha" introduced to further the story's theme. And if the period is the issue, she's somewhat anachronistically modeled on the "Jōshitai", Nakano Takeko... who was gunned down after carrying a naginata into the battlefield without permission during the Battle of Aizu at the culmination of the Boshin War in 1868 (the transition from Edo to Meiji) . There's an understood context to all of this.
@@outsideiskrrtinsideihurt699 The term bushido is a later term, yes, but the concepts within began maybe even as early as the 12th century with Minamoto no Yoritomo, first shougun of the Kamakura.
@@The_Gallowglassand no one gave shit about it. Next you will say that at some point battles looked like honorable duels 1vs1 after formal call outs. Its time to end this made up stories spreaded by bored edo period scribbler that romanticized war. Go back watching anime.
This is more entertaining than napoleon ridley scot making😅
- Bro has:
+ the high ground
+ a gun.
- Girl has:
+ great horse riding skill.
Yep, you can’t always defeat a young lady with a sword. But if you’re talking about guns here. You might as well how to just end her.
Men:Making dirty jokes
Kenshin:I'm not going to laugh *BANG*
上杉側にとっては迷惑な一騎討ちですね。
普通なら自他ともに認める強者同士が名乗りを上げて、双方が自らの名誉と自陣営の士気を高める為に戦うんでしょうが、
女武者に一騎討ちを臨まれても勝って当たり前、負けたら大恥で
勝ったところで士気が上がるどころか微妙な空気にしかなりません。
結局誰も名乗りを上げずじまいなので大将である謙信自ら、力の差の出ない（女相手に男が本気出す必要のない）
飛び道具で殺さざるを得ない。
確かに。
これ新羅三郎義光いらいの武門の名家武田にとってかなりの恥であり、敵に対する侮辱ですからね。
討ってやるのが礼ではあるが、まともにやるのは越後勢の武者だれもが恥になる行為なので適当に銃殺するのが正解。
そしてそれを大将自らがやるのは武田の面目をたててあげる優しさ。
故に初鹿野は厚く礼を申した
Cool! I wish I could watch these movies in their entirety.
The movie title is Heaven and Earth
"ama go encourage everyone"
(is the first casualty)
Why Kenshin killed Yae ? Because she provoked Uesugi men for a duel and went further by stepping in the river. She basically violated the natural border between the two armies and was shot for it. In the scene everyone relates to, it's Takeda's son who kills the retainer. Not Yae. If Kenshin wanted to avenge his man for that reason, he'd better have killed the son or Yae's horse.
I think you got the names wrong takeda shingen was the guy with the rifle uesugi kenshin is the husband of the female warrior that got shot
Edit: After checking the flags the red one are carrying the Takeda Flag My mistake sorry
@@Delta-2-0 Little tip : Takeda is always associated to red color. ;-)
I'd advice you to watch the movie too, it's worth watching.
@@Hachizukatenzo already seen it loved the battle scenes
because she let almost killed my retainer taro he's one who paid the price so i don't hesitate to shoot yae down i'm regret it? no.
@@thrudgelmirkenshin3267 according to your logic, he should have shot the horse and not the onna bugeisha, not mention it's not even Yae who cut the vassal down. You guys totally miss the point, the symbolism and the character here. You should learn about the actual Uesugi kenshin and the sengoku period. There is much more than a petty vengeance in this scene.
Challenge to a duel in the bed, hilarious!
Edson Zilli Edo 0
???
She was trying to Martyr herself so that her army would fight. Kenshin was trying to honor her wish.
@@oddish2253I really don't understand how that's supposed to work: isn't death discouraging?
kind of surprised it wasn't a bow and arrow. I'm more used to Oda or Tokugawa when it comes to gun during the Sengoku era.
major daimyos all had guns,but oda or tokugawa use it most effectively
Portuguese introduced matchlock arquebuses to Japan around the end of 15th century and early 16th century. so It is not a surprise to me. in fact you should give a peek into the imjin and chongyu wars when samurais invaded Korea and made heavy use of tanegashima against not so modernised Korean troops (who had cannons and rockets, which Japan lacked at that time , but surprisingly no guns, which Japan had plenty of them)
Nice shot.
Sengoku era version of “play stupid games, win stupid prizes”.
This was personal shot.
It was. She was responsible for a good friends death earlier.
3:00 「ほら、見ろ...」
Can someone tell me the name of the movie?
I like he shoots a matchlock with no match in serpent. Kool!
well she wanted to play with the big boys...
ラスト侍の映画は嘘で、16世紀の侍は大量の銃を保有しており、戦の序盤は銃撃戦でした。
Japanese Warlords know exactly how to treat a woman!
You xy freaks will encourage killing and treating women bad and yet you still wonder why there are many man hatuuurrs nowadays.
@@chakanyo2768 is not about that threating bad a woman, her choice to challenge a man kills her. Even in today wars will hapend in the same way. Any general challenged by anyone will have the same answer to give. Specialy if is a women or a low rank oficer or soldier.
it's revenge for a friend.
@@patriotenfield3276 A true womanizer.
Looks like the Red Army
I played Shogun 2. Oda Clan plays much like Red Army, swarming your enemy with cheap peasants.
Takeda (Red Guys) plays more like France in Med2, relaying on heavy cavalry, and hammer and anvil tactics
@@hannibalburgers477 Red Cavalry
The Samurai and the Ashigaru after his Retainer burned her: *Cause of death: LMFAO*
I guess Takeda Shingen could not do without women while being away on campaign so he had to form this "Amazonian" cavalry guard unit to perform two duties, duel in bed and duel in the field.
That said, by the medieval era, combat was purely fought by the men as armor weight increased dramatically. I mean even during the ancient era, warrior women were only for gladiatorial spectacles. Perhaps the only real example is the Amazonian warriors of the Scythians who like the Japanese, fought on mounts.
Armor weight never really weighed that much, especially when well fitted to the wearer. That part is easy for a warrior or soldier to master. The main detriment to wearing armor is the heat that builds up in the torso and head, from a cuirass and helmet. That's what really saps your endurance and your brain power, in battle.
@@The_Gallowglass Agreed. However the weight that Roman legionaries carry is no joke. At the height of empire and technology, the weight was 7 kg with the segmentata plate armor.
But most of the time Romans or the medieval combatant wore full chainmail or lorica hamata that weighs 11 to 12 kg with an internal gambeson.
So for a woman it's not really feasible. Given that average height of warriors at that time ranged from 5'3 to 5'7. The women are even shorter at 5' as average or lower.
The Germans and the Nordic Vikings did have shieldmaidens as combatants but they are few and far between. One can assume these women are like their male compatriots having a taller than average 5'10, 5'11 as in the Viking warriors average height.
The typical Danish Viking and the Viking Rus of Novgorod/Kiev was noted by the Byzantines to have an average height of 5'11.
Therefore it depended on the culture and the demographics that utilized women in combat
@@ConstantineJoseph Well, then we're getting into gear they're carrying around. Roman soldiers carried a lot of weight, but they wouldn't be carrying that during a battle. That would all be taken care of by the non-combatant helpers. In the fight they'd have their armor, shield, sword, spear /pilum, assuming they're a legionary. All depends on the era, but they'd get close enough to throw their pila and all they'd have left is their sword, shield, helmet and cuirass. Late period they'd pretty much all go back to maille.
What's the name of this movie
was scared of a woman and kill her with a gun ☠
This is more entertaining than napoleon ridley scot making😅
What is The name of The film?
Heaven and Earth
Thank you very much :))
Its Called kill the feminazi bitch
Ten to Chi to
I dont see Tom Cruise
Great
Lewis Joseph Hernandez Cynthia White Michelle
What movie is this?
Bitch: wawawa, wawawa!!!
Warrior in black armor: What? nigga? (Bang!)
the fact karensusan has not deleted this comment really amuses me a lot!
What film is this?
Heaven & Earth.
based
what show is this?
kenshin weichei! gab es für fraun keine helme?
1:46 salute to these ladies for being badasses... Then again, it would've been much better if the men do the close combat fighting and the women do most of the long range like shooting arrows or firing muskets... Anyway this is just my opinion... 😊🙂
天と地の上杉謙信、どうかなぁ？？、、(*^-^*)、、武田信玄が塩が困ってるときに塩を送るお人良いだよ～～。敵に塩を送る。🍶酒好きだし、謙信が天下狙えば、天下とれたね🗾日本🐎馬
Allen David Clark Thomas Martin Jason
何だこの間抜けは
He Is Shoot Her Because He Is Scared From Her He Is Nonsense He Is Empty!
エイムハックか？
I honor your ojinin
BASED
Cool.. Mexican samurais
화랑관창 따라하네 ㅋㅋㅋ
What is the name of this movie?
Heaven and Earth (1990)