@@DomadorDeReposeras0 If I’m correct, there is more than one category for Nobel prizes. Furthermore, this is a pretty impressive scientific achievement
@@BottomBunkArtit was created as a way to pay back for the horrific shit that dynamite got used for since he felt guilty And he also didn't want history to remember him as a monster so yeah. Alfred nobel was like the good ending variant of Fritz haber
@@genericineverything7619your not wrong there Alfred Nobel is the founding father of modern day explosives just like Fritz harbor was the founding father of chemical warfare
@@jamesharpXD because in case he is killed and people blame that he died of suicide because hes suicidal just a reminder that someone must have covered up their tracks if something happens
could be because of the recent news of how a whistle blower guy for the boeing um airlines company , recently died, and still under investigation, says that it was a suicide
"oof, im sorry but "insert random bullshot excuse" happened, so we are going to need to send a technician to see that error, can you receive him any day of this month from 6am to 3pm?" 😂
I mean, actually yes. Just because they can make the cable transmit at that speed doesn't mean the rest of thier hardware is capable of handling everyone running a million gigabit a second. The servers you're passing data through still need to able to process that data, which they absolutely can't, and neither can anyones computer.
@@jesuscornstorm737 ... is the reason I as a customer choose the best deal. Which is why the company offers me the best deal it can to outperform the competition. I am an electrical engineer. Trust me, if internet providers would be keeping some secret technology away from you on purpose, I would make a new company utilizing it. That would allow me to outperform them. You would then buy my things. It's called free market baby🤩
It's poke pouring a highway to 200mph, but your side road is still 30 pit still works, but more importantly country to country where most transfer takes place
No one is gonna enjoy it, let me continue with the highway examples. Imagine the highway is the fiberoptic cable and your vehicle is you router. No matter what's the speed limit you will never go that fast because your car is trash.
Broadcast internet is making strides. For the longest time my parents had to pay for either a stupidly expensive hotspot that cranked around 50mbps erratically, or shitty Hughes Net that gave 2mbps consistently. They now have broadcast internet and it is over 200mbps, I went to visit and I could stream without interruption. I downloaded a 1.6g movie from Prime in around a minute.
Wait. Did the video really mislead you to believe this can make your internet a million times faster? It can't. Go read theough their research at Aston University.
Just *one* comment would have been funny. But in this comment section, *everyone* seems to believe such wild lies. As an electrical engineer, who actually knows how to *make* such communication lines, I am getting a heart attack. The video suggests one guy in his garage revolutionized everything.🙄 But it is just a Team at Aston University making a next development step with wider bandwidth hardware. Your internet cannot get a million times faster.
@@n0th1ng_72 that's why we need 2 tb of ram- ram is fast. Just it takes up a lot of space, most motherboards can't handle more than 4 sticks, and it's not very good for long term storage. But that won't matter, since we can download games like COD, cyberpunk, and ark in mere seconds. So ram storage it is!
Guy's name is Dr. Ian Phillips. He works at Aston University in England. He's part of an international team of researchers. They achieved a data transfer rate of 301 terabits per second. All it took was the development of an optical processor that can use two more wavelengths of light than commercial tech is capable of.
@@StentorCoeruleus the effect is pretty small over earthly distances, so simply making the detectors a little bit ''fuzzy'' would solve that problem. the same trick is used in radio receivers.
Oh wow, that's genius. So they're using Multimode fiber (multiple strands of light), but since there are different wavelengths, they won't get in each other's way. This would then allow multiple sets of data to be transferred through one cable at the same time without the risk of each strand of light to get in another's way. Am I understanding this correctly?
And brand new datacenters even if we replace the HDDs which are still industry standard (~600Mbps), with SSDs, Sata has a limit of 6Gbps, NVMe maxes out at 60Gbps, not sure what our current ratio between the two is across all major datacenters then of course they too would need to replace their network equipment All of that, and still, given our current technological limitations, we wouldn't have a practical use for the speeds we could theoretically pass through fiber
@@TheFloatingSheep yeah, this new innovation is a leap in technology that we won't see come to full use for I'd wager, 20, even 30 years. If even that. It's like the combustion engine. Yeah, it was a cool invention back in the late 1800s, but beyond that, it had almost no real practical way to be use to its full potential. Hell, we're still tapping into its full potential today.
@@TheFloatingSheep fun detail, if my math is right [it's probably off a bit, being back of the envelope] at that rate, you could move the sum total of the internet from a hypothetical point A to point B in ~54 years.
@@GuestDude_HandlesAreDumb it's a bit like improving the aerodynamics of the horse carriage back in the day, not much help when you've got a horse in front pulling the damn thing
@@eloquentsloth6080 he knows, when someone makes a discovery or invention like that, they "mysteriously" without explanation, like the guy who made a car that ran on water
Byte Kilobyte Megabytes Gigabyte A gigabyte is 1,073,741,824 bytes (1.07 Billion) With 301 Million Gigabits per second, that's 37.625 Million gigabytes per second, you'd have to spend 16.1 Quintillion Dollar per second For scale, the global wealth is roughly 454 trillion dollar (based on end of 2022) You'd have to spend ~35,594x more than global wealth, every single second - 🤓 ☝️
Fuck Spectrum man. Frontier apparently acquired fiber optic and it went door to door selling their services in town for $2 less. No more negotiation with the retention team at Spectrum this year, canceling everything Spectrum.
Nah the Nobel Peace Price has been going to some great people like that one guy who kept the most powerful country in the world in multiple wars and still got it 😂
@@Mud_MonkeyHe’s more referring to the scientific awards which tend to go to actual achievements (e.g. The Lithium Ion Battery) instead of terrible leaders.
@@Mud_Monkey you mean obama? He got a peace prize and used so many drones to slaughter people... Cant take the nobel prizes as trustworthy source since then
Oh he's definitely suicidal or he has a spontaneous urge to go swimming in the Bermuda Triangle. Luckily he made it this far before suicidal tendencies took him away 🙏 HOW MANY MOREEEEEEEE
Buy what? It uses the same tech we use for todays wifi. All he did was use smaller wavelengths and got the reciever and transmitter to communicate with it. It aint much work at all to do allat.
@@homieinthesky8919u forgot that Internet providers purposely slow Internet to get you to buy more expensive packages in order to unlock faster Internet.
@@Imdedmateyou act as if we can't already do this and most importantly, make it at home, tell me you know nothing about technology without telling me you know nothing about technology
@@nahumhernandezg2188 bruv, i literaly never said that it would be achievable for the common person to make at home. All i said is that companies really like to take your money for the least amount of work.
You need to convince the Telco company leader to buy the equipement first. He says existing infrastructure but something has to change money has to be spent, they won't do it because they have dividends to pay.
user speed will be bottlenecked by their storage & system speeds etc, Internet I 's already fast enough but thus discovery only benefits companies to serve more user for less,
I work with fiber optics (FO), and internet cabling in general, in buildings. And while yes, you can beam a ton of data through fiber optic cables, then there are problems with it: FO cables are used as highways, in newer buildings it's what brings the internet in. But inside buildings, copper wires are used, most commonly CAT6, which can only let through 10gb/s at a maximum of a 100meters length (assuming it has no sharp bends or twists in it, and the plug/socket on the other end has been well made) Now, you could get a FO wall socket, but it would be so expensive, it's not really worth it. The cable itself is more expensive and a lot more fragile, not to mention the cost of the needed adapters, as your computer still uses copper, so you'd need to convert it, and those converters are probably 40+ times more expensive than a simple ethernet socket. You'd also have no use for a speed that high, atleast not yet. The copper cables will already give you insane speeds, even old cables.
I installed fiber for Viacom and their engineer literally said it’s as fast as the speed of light but they will put a cap on speeds and sell at whatever price they want
Right now I’m most developed countries gig speed internet - so like data capacity you could hardly have imagined back when we were on DSL are available. Does it cost a more ? Yeah a little bit. But like something companies would have happily paid millions for 20 years ago is available to a ton of people. And nobody would be working on this next one if we didn’t let the last guy make his money. But fiber is now a competitive market where we get product that was literally unbelievable when our parents born. And I can already hear the complaints that it’s not available everywhere in developed countries - that’s not big companies being cruel - that’s the fact that if it costs $100k a mile to set it up, and you have a house every 100 feet paying $40 /month you can pay back the builder for his service in 4 years. If you make it rural they’re 1000 apart, payback is 40 years and that’s just not a reasonable investment. And thankfully, because we let the fiber people make their money, some other dude invented rockets that were 5x as affordable and cheap satellites and now internet that most wealthy neighborhoods couldn’t get in 2005 are available pretty much anywhere (once they finish deploying) Thanks my rant. Internets important to equality and it’s not available everywhere. But it probably one of the best stories out there an impossible product becoming a luxury product luxury becoming a mainstream product in the span of a couple decades. its being deployed really rapidly in developing countries, and somewhere like the US super high speeds are available to ~60% of the population at a reasonable price, and that number is going up as fast as it can (literally - with all the companies building anyway and the recent government subsidies, there are not enough work crews to deploy it faster.
It entirely depends on the local setup. All of the Internet backbone is fiber. Unless you have fiber in your house, it terminates somewhere onto copper or wireless, which can greatly limit throughput. ISPs don't like investing in infrastructure, such as replacing copper with fiber, because there's a huge amount of paperwork and process to getting digging permits, and it's incredibly expensive. It's usually not worth the investment for low density suburbs.
Meanwhile Comcast... you load a page with ad banners that aren't blocked yet and get flagged, throttling you down to 5mbps download, 0.2 up, then spend half-full week playing escalation roulette on customer support to get the internet cck ring removed.
We’ve known in ATL now for a few years just the monopolistic companies that run on the infrastructure such as Google Comcast and AT&T, will not allow us to turn up speeds
My mother owns a ISP company that also lays fiber optic cables for other providers and said no one knew about it. Give me 5 dollars. Also read a damn article about this guys discovery before spewing complete nonsense.
Ironically how we probably sound to people from like the 80s or early 90s that knew about computers talking about only getting 40mps downloading something lmao
@@lilithbeandude in Australia 40mbps is god speed. My entire life I’ve had 2 - 5 mbps and since moving out I’ve have 60 - 70 average and I’m basically a god among my friends with how quick I can download
@@GabrielHR55 ex? are you sure? the us gov't spends a lot of money training rangers, light infantry and reconnaissance units. not utilizing them would be stupid. you can say whatever you want for the mental acuity of the leadership but cia has some competent case officers.
@@japonieczpolski2903 no but that's not the point. Nobel was not a war profiteer and loathed the use of tnt for war so much he created the peace prize.
I used to do tech support for T1 Lines. There are two types of internet. Their is home internet which is just scraps tossed to the peasants. Then there's the internet for the corporate sector. Speed and capacity are enormous. It's like comparing spitting on the ground to a fire hose. You'll never be allowed to access the proper internet.
@@statethis Not at all. 10mbps is 178 times faster than dial up. If something took 1 min to download at 10mbps, it would take almost 3hrs on dial up... And that's as long as no one picked up the phone and forced you to restart the download. I legitimately remember downloading a few songs off napster and having to start it at night with hopes it would be done by morning.
How naive can people be? How do you use internet now? Is it really free of charge? Don't think so😅 do you have a say if your Internet provider puts they're prices up? Don't think so either😅 aren't we meant to start to paying carbon tax? Don't we exhale carbon out ?? 😂😂😂
@@lsksniper1936 that’s insanely high for a country with 300 million inhabitants. Not even the Netherlands with the biggest internet exchange reaches such numbers.
The Netherlands isn't that high in rankings. Look at pass-by. Yes, it's closer to 35% if you count all non-lined access but that's semantics because it would be impossible to implement that figure anyway. Spain, Portugal, Japan are all at 90% aggregate so regardless my point stands that "most homes" is an unrealistic statement.
It doesn't really mean a whole lot in terms of bandwidth. The type of cable in the ground is what ultimately determines the bottleneck of network speed. If your property still has copper cables, you're not going to experience any change. As of last year, 75% of homes in the UK had access to gigabit fibre optic broadband. That means around 1/4 of people in the country don't have access to fibre. Even if they did utilise the upgrade, it just means they can cheap out more on networking. As of right now, one cable serves 32 homes at gigabit capacity. This means they could charge more people for the same limited service.
@@tomd96 Let's also not forget that most of us don't have storage capable of speeds even remotely close to this. Your typical 7200RPM HDD is looking at about 150 - 180MB/s, SATA SSDs are around 500, and M.2 SSDs can be about 5000MB/s or 5GB/s. Having that kind of internet access is like owning a MacLaren F1 and keeping it on a 1000 square foot island.
@@K-Anator I was just going to say this, the real bottle neck is going to be the hardware, from the routers to the devices, nothing on the consumer market is even remotely close to being able to make use of this.....
What most people do not understand: you still need to change a lot of stuff. You CAN keep the cable. But you still need to change the Routers, Firewalls, Servers and all this stuff. So no "using existing Infrastructur".
the gig will be a standard, costing that 20 bucks a month type cheap... plus, most tech probably wont be able to handle the speeds given off from the internet.
@z-statusss1561 exactly. I have 1gig connection but my local network is fiber switches that can do 40. You can get like 200gbps switches but they're so expensive it's crazy. Like no normal person is spending 20k for their network setup lol its for server farms etc but im still excited
Yes and also there is limitations with your equipment, a pc has max 2.5 gigabit LAN, soon maybe 5 but you will be paying probably 500 plus for a motherboard with that capability. You could use a pcie card but itll cost you and you could saturate yoir lanes before getting close to 20 gigs. So this could be a good thing as companies will have 2 or 3 gig internet as there base speed which could potentially be like 30 a month, and there 100 200 600 ect will be massive money, but bog business will pay for it as the will need the bandwidth for there offices. Same as T1 vs home internet.
@@MercPunisher theres dozens of motherboards with 10gig nics now. Most come with 2.5gig standard. Only the cheapest have 1gig and you can get used 40gig pcie nic cards for like 100 bucks. But then you need a network switch capable of 40gbps. But 10gbps is on A LOT of am5 motherboards. 2.5 is def not the max in anyway and never was.
Not only did you not credit the guy, you didn't even get the information right. Dr Ian Phillips is one of the Ashton University researchers to send data 4.5 million times faster than average broadband.
Thank you for not only calling out the zero credit given but leaving good information to go off of for those of us who once you go to the source and read the whole facts. I had no idea where to start but Dr. Ian Phillips gave me all the information I needed.
This is so unbelievably impressive! The only restriction are devices sending and receiving data though. our computer cannot process this much information in such quick succession or even write it to your hard drive. The server also cannot send this much data all at once.
@@randomcrap7682idk what your reading gg but with the technology in our current time won’t keep up with this so it’s not going to be able to process even the internet because we don’t have stuff like enough data storage to process this so he probably will be able to complain with lag
They need to get that money back from you after you cut cable TV, so yeah. Too bad your regional monopoly keeps killing off startup competition that try to give you better internet. I'm sure they'd love you to vote in someone that would help with that, but so far we've all failed.
@@user-su3qr1ll3w I think: bad things happen to good people because powerfull people make money from selling many people stuff. Rich people make money, not progress
Correction: there is some infrastructure change that’s required. Current switches and such can’t emit the light and read it in the new frequencies. So those will have to be switched. But all the same fiber lines can be used, which is the harder and more expensive part to replace.
“You won’t need to replace anything. The price will just increase exponentially for no reason.” At least y’all are civil in informing me, and that’s what I appreciates about ya.
A transceiver for a 400gbit fiber connection costs you a few 1000 dollars and you need two of them to have a connection. Let alone the cost to upgrade all the backbone infrastructure for wich youd be paying your ass off to your isp (even if they wouldnt overcharge customers). Youd find that kind of speeds in an undersea cable where the cost of laying the cable is already astronomical.
@@aljodesign973 Don't undersea optical cables have boosters inline? So you would have to actually 'dig it up' and replace them to take advantage of this.
@@MuSic-ok7dh they do but as far as i know its not uncommon that the cables get a performance upgrade based on the headroom and capabilities of the used hardware and new technical advances. The reason why i took them as an example is because they are one example that comes to my mind where exotic technologies for maximising throughout actually come to use in an economicaly viable way
@@torstengang5521also research isn’t free. Why should they discover something and give it away for free. They are going to sell the information to companies and the companies are going to sell it to consumers.
@@itsdavski2117this technology is not going to be running a direct line into your home, most people are not running fiber cards in their home desktop. This is going to be for upgrades to ISP and data center connections. If you run parallel ports you can max out hard drives and basic SSDs already with the networking currently in your home so if this was a real issue we are already there.
@@Pr0x1m1f1c4710n Unless you have a quantum computer, no existing hardware could use even a fraction of that speed. So yeah, bigass goddamn limitation.
no. they will just be bought by the largest company. that's how capitalism works, large companies consolidate smaller companies to keep monopolies going
@@clown134as Long as the small business becomes rich I don’t care. A small business has the choice to not get bought, if I make a business and for example Microsoft offers me couple of millions, I would accept the offer, I don’t care if Microsoft controls the electric market if then I get to enjoy my freedom as a rich man living peaceful and investing the money smartly
@@marcello9476 its how capitalism literally works every single day in practice. capitalism may look good on paper in a econ class, but in practice it results in monolopies
All I'm hearing is how companies will hold this from the average person and charge exorbitant prices for it
True
Fact
Correct
Facts
Facts
Ironically, I’m pretty sure that’s what the Nobel prize was originally supposed to be for.
No it's so Dynamite Boy didn't get remembered for just making dynamite (THIS IS A JOKE)
@@Commander9013”joke” but also a bit true
@@DomadorDeReposeras0 If I’m correct, there is more than one category for Nobel prizes.
Furthermore, this is a pretty impressive scientific achievement
@@BottomBunkArtit was created as a way to pay back for the horrific shit that dynamite got used for since he felt guilty
And he also didn't want history to remember him as a monster so yeah.
Alfred nobel was like the good ending variant of Fritz haber
@@genericineverything7619your not wrong there Alfred Nobel is the founding father of modern day explosives just like Fritz harbor was the founding father of chemical warfare
Remember, he's not suicidal
why do people say that?
People who discover big things that may affect the world often go missing/die misteriously @@jamesharpXD
@@jamesharpXD
because in case he is killed and people blame that he died of suicide because hes suicidal
just a reminder that someone must have covered up their tracks if something happens
could be because of the recent news of how a whistle blower guy for the boeing um airlines company , recently died, and still under investigation, says that it was a suicide
in dying countries like north america, things start to happen like in primitive tribes if they are not getting more civilised that us
"with a small price of $2500 a day, you too can get these speeds 😃" -ISPs sooner or later
Competition will drive that into the dirt so long as government corruption doesn't get too involved....
Ah damnit.
Competitive pricing is soon to drive that into 1¢ per year.
@pubcle what competition?
@@pubcleHad to jinx it smh
@@andreasjoannai6441 So you’re saying you only pay 1 cent per year for internet?
Yeah internet will only go up in price.
Internet providers: Still just throttling your speeds.
"oof, im sorry but "insert random bullshot excuse" happened, so we are going to need to send a technician to see that error, can you receive him any day of this month from 6am to 3pm?"
😂
At&t did it to me when I was on a prepaid 😂
Not as much throttling speeds, as just using expensive Cisco equipment that becomes obsolete in ten years periodically
Bro fr I was about to say that😂 man aint no way they gon let you have such speed and not pay a million dollars per second😂
I mean, actually yes. Just because they can make the cable transmit at that speed doesn't mean the rest of thier hardware is capable of handling everyone running a million gigabit a second.
The servers you're passing data through still need to able to process that data, which they absolutely can't, and neither can anyones computer.
*2 days later*
"Genius found dead by complete and total car accident"
he offed himself by putting five bullets in his back.
@@sam-psonsmith9951why ?
It’ll probably be a shark attack while hiking in the Rockies
@@kanishksharma360sarcasm bro 😂
@@kanishksharma360he was extremely suicidal
Companies going to gatekeep this hard for another 50 years
No. Please tell me you are not serious
@@JG-xi4tu human greed my friend...
@@jesuscornstorm737 ... is the reason I as a customer choose the best deal. Which is why the company offers me the best deal it can to outperform the competition.
I am an electrical engineer. Trust me, if internet providers would be keeping some secret technology away from you on purpose, I would make a new company utilizing it. That would allow me to outperform them. You would then buy my things.
It's called free market baby🤩
99
way too optimistic
"Bro i have a bad wifi i am lagging"
Bro's wifi:
👏👏👏
My current situation:
FPS: 4.7
PING: 39271
MAIN PROBLEM: Keyboard input delay
@@Goldn214bro the keyboard input delay ain't your main problem 💀
Dude you gotta use cable connection if you can help it. Wi-fi is for phones since the cable won't fit.
Tell me you don't understand networking without telling me you don't understand networking.
People in small towns without fiber cables:
Oh, that's cool. Yall enjoy that.
It's poke pouring a highway to 200mph, but your side road is still 30 pit still works, but more importantly country to country where most transfer takes place
No one is gonna enjoy it, let me continue with the highway examples. Imagine the highway is the fiberoptic cable and your vehicle is you router. No matter what's the speed limit you will never go that fast because your car is trash.
ppl in Large towns WITJ fiber optic cables: "April Fools"
Broadcast internet is making strides. For the longest time my parents had to pay for either a stupidly expensive hotspot that cranked around 50mbps erratically, or shitty Hughes Net that gave 2mbps consistently. They now have broadcast internet and it is over 200mbps, I went to visit and I could stream without interruption. I downloaded a 1.6g movie from Prime in around a minute.
I live in a holler in the woods and I have fiber Internet
ISP: NO NO! You heard him wrong, the internet is 1.2 times faster, not 1.2 million times. But don't worry, that will only triple your monthly fee.
Wait. Did the video really mislead you to believe this can make your internet a million times faster? It can't. Go read theough their research at Aston University.
@@JG-xi4tuhuh?
@@JG-xi4tujust wait
@@warlordkiller9301 Wait for what?
My mates in Optical Components research would fall unconscious if they saw this conspiratory comment section.
the government: time to disappear my friend.
Hidden by the FBI and his invention is applied there probably
Do people really believe in sich conspiracies?
@@JG-xi4tuBro, it's just a comment.
I'm not even from the US, I'm from South America, and that happens around here, it was just comedy.
Just *one* comment would have been funny. But in this comment section, *everyone* seems to believe such wild lies.
As an electrical engineer, who actually knows how to *make* such communication lines, I am getting a heart attack.
The video suggests one guy in his garage revolutionized everything.🙄
But it is just a Team at Aston University making a next development step with wider bandwidth hardware.
Your internet cannot get a million times faster.
Now only one problem- even nvme drives won't keep up with this, so we need to get to work on that!
Store it in the ram!!! Ram storage on top!!
@@potatoman5070 It's not that there's not enough of storage, it's that it's not fast enough
@@n0th1ng_72 that's why we need 2 tb of ram- ram is fast. Just it takes up a lot of space, most motherboards can't handle more than 4 sticks, and it's not very good for long term storage. But that won't matter, since we can download games like COD, cyberpunk, and ark in mere seconds. So ram storage it is!
Well it definitely is a boost
well the servers you download them from aslo wont go anyware near that speed.
Guy's name is Dr. Ian Phillips. He works at Aston University in England. He's part of an international team of researchers. They achieved a data transfer rate of 301 terabits per second. All it took was the development of an optical processor that can use two more wavelengths of light than commercial tech is capable of.
Ty
Don’t the lasers shift in wavelength over km tho
@@StentorCoeruleus the effect is pretty small over earthly distances, so simply making the detectors a little bit ''fuzzy'' would solve that problem. the same trick is used in radio receivers.
This guy didn’t even put the dudes name in the video that’s crazy thank you
Oh wow, that's genius. So they're using Multimode fiber (multiple strands of light), but since there are different wavelengths, they won't get in each other's way. This would then allow multiple sets of data to be transferred through one cable at the same time without the risk of each strand of light to get in another's way. Am I understanding this correctly?
finally I can download Red Dead Redemption without waiting for a century
You won’t be able to afford this service
hard drive speeds will be the bottleneck
"That will be $10,000,000,000 sir"
Per month, per user.
That's just for the Line Card from Cisco. LOL.
The Nobel Prize is a reward for exactly that.
*was
How so?@@ablazedguy
I mean there's not always someone doing something this big so some years it may go to someone who did something small but this year
I'm waiting for Dylan Mulvaney to win it.
It doesn't, you clearly don't know how politics works.
Correction: We won't need new cables to do this, but we will need new hardware to transmit and receive the information on each end of the cable.
True. Fortunately that's a minor level revamp as opposed to a full on infrastructure replacement.
And brand new datacenters
even if we replace the HDDs which are still industry standard (~600Mbps), with SSDs, Sata has a limit of 6Gbps, NVMe maxes out at 60Gbps, not sure what our current ratio between the two is across all major datacenters
then of course they too would need to replace their network equipment
All of that, and still, given our current technological limitations, we wouldn't have a practical use for the speeds we could theoretically pass through fiber
@@TheFloatingSheep yeah, this new innovation is a leap in technology that we won't see come to full use for I'd wager, 20, even 30 years. If even that. It's like the combustion engine. Yeah, it was a cool invention back in the late 1800s, but beyond that, it had almost no real practical way to be use to its full potential. Hell, we're still tapping into its full potential today.
@@TheFloatingSheep fun detail, if my math is right [it's probably off a bit, being back of the envelope] at that rate, you could move the sum total of the internet from a hypothetical point A to point B in ~54 years.
@@GuestDude_HandlesAreDumb it's a bit like improving the aerodynamics of the horse carriage back in the day, not much help when you've got a horse in front pulling the damn thing
"How did you do it ?"
"LIPSTICK, LACED WITH NICOTINE 🎶"
Two "self-inflicted" gunshot wounds: "It's showtime."
PROTECT THIS PERSON IMMEDIATELY AND TRUST NO ONE!!
Till one person still affected by the disapearance of the one that imveted car that run on water lol
Whoever invented this didn't off himself
@@eloquentsloth6080 he knows, when someone makes a discovery or invention like that, they "mysteriously" without explanation, like the guy who made a car that ran on water
High speed internet been already available to buy stop being caveman it’s just no ones gonna buy it.
@@ShyviaAngel yea but i am sure the oil company is gonna show up his doorstep with a glock in hand
ISP companies rubbing their hands together ready to charge $400+ for it
$400 an hour
$400 a minute @@TilloWasTaken
$400 a byte
Byte
Kilobyte
Megabytes
Gigabyte
A gigabyte is 1,073,741,824 bytes (1.07 Billion)
With 301 Million Gigabits per second, that's 37.625 Million gigabytes per second, you'd have to spend 16.1 Quintillion Dollar per second
For scale, the global wealth is roughly 454 trillion dollar (based on end of 2022)
You'd have to spend ~35,594x more than global wealth, every single second
- 🤓 ☝️
@@TilloWasTakenit might seem crazy what im about to say...
Spectrum: "That'll be $50,000 a month."
Fuck Spectrum man. Frontier apparently acquired fiber optic and it went door to door selling their services in town for $2 less. No more negotiation with the retention team at Spectrum this year, canceling everything Spectrum.
Apple getting ready to charge 5 million to make their speeds twice as fast:
These kinds of advancements to humanity are EXACTLY what Nobel Prizes used to be for.
Yeah that's the joke, they only give them to war criminals now so who would've known lmfao
Nah the Nobel Peace Price has been going to some great people like that one guy who kept the most powerful country in the world in multiple wars and still got it 😂
@@Mud_MonkeyHe’s more referring to the scientific awards which tend to go to actual achievements (e.g. The Lithium Ion Battery) instead of terrible leaders.
Nah the longest/biggest sh't in the world is worthy of Noble prize
@@Mud_Monkey you mean obama? He got a peace prize and used so many drones to slaughter people... Cant take the nobel prizes as trustworthy source since then
I sure hope this guy isn't suicidal.
He isn't.... but im sure that will be what's written on his autopsy report
Oh he's definitely suicidal or he has a spontaneous urge to go swimming in the Bermuda Triangle. Luckily he made it this far before suicidal tendencies took him away 🙏 HOW MANY MOREEEEEEEE
😂
wtf? is this a joke
@@SynthWqve1 Companies tend to kill people and wash it off as suicide
Negative ping 💀
That one friend: bro, I'm lagging!!!!
His Internet:
"bro im lagging trust me i swear"
meanwhile bro's internet hq:
Just wait 😂 people will figure out how to ruin it.
They'll just blame it on their specs lol
Maybe they have bad ping but high bandwidth
Be thankful that GOD woke you up today! Pray for everyone! AMEN! None of us are worthy! But remember, GOD hates the sin, not the sinner! AMEN! 🙏🏾✝️
@@bort_hilllike you
They aren't going to give anyone anything from this for free. They're going to force people to buy it. Let's be real.
Buy what? It uses the same tech we use for todays wifi. All he did was use smaller wavelengths and got the reciever and transmitter to communicate with it. It aint much work at all to do allat.
@@homieinthesky8919 you forgot one major factor, greed.
@@homieinthesky8919u forgot that Internet providers purposely slow Internet to get you to buy more expensive packages in order to unlock faster Internet.
@@Imdedmateyou act as if we can't already do this and most importantly, make it at home, tell me you know nothing about technology without telling me you know nothing about technology
@@nahumhernandezg2188 bruv, i literaly never said that it would be achievable for the common person to make at home.
All i said is that companies really like to take your money for the least amount of work.
Even if my home has this internet. He will still complain “I’m LaGgInG”
Hopefully this guy will lives long and well off his ingenuity! Quit it with all the superstitious bull. Humanity needs more folks like him.
Cable companies gonna make their prices 1.2 million times more expensive
That was my first response 😂
Won't work on any cable networks. Everyone's favorite xfinity, cox, Warner won't exist in about 5 years
You need to convince the Telco company leader to buy the equipement first. He says existing infrastructure but something has to change money has to be spent, they won't do it because they have dividends to pay.
Cable companies often use fiber on the larger parts of their network. So that part of the hop may be faster
user speed will be bottlenecked by their storage & system speeds etc, Internet I 's already fast enough but thus discovery only benefits companies to serve more user for less,
" BRO I SWEAR I WAS LAGGING SO BAD "
What internet bro was using:
Bro bro bro bro bro
You sound like a toddler.
Damn.
@@marksmith161so?
@@marksmith161you actually give a shit about people’s vocabulary?
I work with fiber optics (FO), and internet cabling in general, in buildings. And while yes, you can beam a ton of data through fiber optic cables, then there are problems with it:
FO cables are used as highways, in newer buildings it's what brings the internet in. But inside buildings, copper wires are used, most commonly CAT6, which can only let through 10gb/s at a maximum of a 100meters length (assuming it has no sharp bends or twists in it, and the plug/socket on the other end has been well made)
Now, you could get a FO wall socket, but it would be so expensive, it's not really worth it. The cable itself is more expensive and a lot more fragile, not to mention the cost of the needed adapters, as your computer still uses copper, so you'd need to convert it, and those converters are probably 40+ times more expensive than a simple ethernet socket.
You'd also have no use for a speed that high, atleast not yet. The copper cables will already give you insane speeds, even old cables.
That one kid will still pull the “IM LAGGING”
fibre optic companies: "Target in sight am I clear to fire"
Cleared hot
Since they are using the same hardware there really isn't much reason to deal with him
They love him. That just means they can sell more and even expensiver packages.
Grammatical error : "am" and "I" are flipped, now get his ahh
@@RogueGMR am I allowed to mock you?
Translation: Now your ISP can charge you more for better speeds.
Translation: Now our ISPs can charge us more for the same, or less, service and Market it as literally everything else.
Yep, to flip some switch somewhere near your house, and the actual speed will be 2/3 of what you’re paying for
This is a lot more for enterprise level internet. Most people can't even use a 10 gig connection on a single device.
Don't forget the "up to" you'll never actually get the speed despite paying for it, you will still only get the normal gig speed
😂😂😂😂😂😅 greatest nerd comment ever. I love it
Bro : I'm lagging
Bro's internet :
People in charge of infrastructure in the UK: "We'll get around to it.... eventually."
The avengers wouldn’t stand a chance if Ultron found this out
☠️
I just watched age of ultron like two hours ago 😭
@@Mushchild2have you ever considered murder
@@mimsy3369that escalated quickly
😂
"And nothing will need to changed!"
"So you're saying we can charge 1.2 million times the price for internet? Bet!"
Just like insulin
I installed fiber for Viacom and their engineer literally said it’s as fast as the speed of light but they will put a cap on speeds and sell at whatever price they want
Right now I’m most developed countries gig speed internet - so like data capacity you could hardly have imagined back when we were on DSL are available. Does it cost a more ? Yeah a little bit. But like something companies would have happily paid millions for 20 years ago is available to a ton of people. And nobody would be working on this next one if we didn’t let the last guy make his money. But fiber is now a competitive market where we get product that was literally unbelievable when our parents born.
And I can already hear the complaints that it’s not available everywhere in developed countries - that’s not big companies being cruel - that’s the fact that if it costs $100k a mile to set it up, and you have a house every 100 feet paying $40 /month you can pay back the builder for his service in 4 years. If you make it rural they’re 1000 apart, payback is 40 years and that’s just not a reasonable investment.
And thankfully, because we let the fiber people make their money, some other dude invented rockets that were 5x as affordable and cheap satellites and now internet that most wealthy neighborhoods couldn’t get in 2005 are available pretty much anywhere (once they finish deploying)
Thanks my rant. Internets important to equality and it’s not available everywhere. But it probably one of the best stories out there an impossible product becoming a luxury product luxury becoming a mainstream product in the span of a couple decades.
its being deployed really rapidly in developing countries, and somewhere like the US super high speeds are available to ~60% of the population at a reasonable price, and that number is going up as fast as it can (literally - with all the companies building anyway and the recent government subsidies, there are not enough work crews to deploy it faster.
1.2k likes 👍
Gotta love capitalism
This increase in download speeds is gonna make gaming absolutely baller
Still my internet gonna take 10 minutes to load google 💀💀💀
Dang that guy is smart
Prob end up unalived
True
btw if nobody told you yet....April Fools
@@home9dog2blue199it's 6th of April my friend.
Used 100% of his brain to use 100% of the fiber.
$5 says that ISPs knew how to use it, they just kept it to themselves, and pretended they didn't so they could throttle people more
It entirely depends on the local setup. All of the Internet backbone is fiber. Unless you have fiber in your house, it terminates somewhere onto copper or wireless, which can greatly limit throughput.
ISPs don't like investing in infrastructure, such as replacing copper with fiber, because there's a huge amount of paperwork and process to getting digging permits, and it's incredibly expensive. It's usually not worth the investment for low density suburbs.
Meanwhile Comcast... you load a page with ad banners that aren't blocked yet and get flagged, throttling you down to 5mbps download, 0.2 up, then spend half-full week playing escalation roulette on customer support to get the internet cck ring removed.
We’ve known in ATL now for a few years just the monopolistic companies that run on the infrastructure such as Google Comcast and AT&T, will not allow us to turn up speeds
My mother owns a ISP company that also lays fiber optic cables for other providers and said no one knew about it. Give me 5 dollars. Also read a damn article about this guys discovery before spewing complete nonsense.
The ISP's don't design or build the cables. So no, they haven't been withholding this capability.
This sounds like something Phineas and Ferb would do
The thing I’m hearing is this guy deserves an Oscar a noble prize beyond the news for how much she has done to make our lives better with Internet
"Dude I'm lagging, I only got half a million Gb/s, it's unplayable!"
Ironically how we probably sound to people from like the 80s or early 90s that knew about computers talking about only getting 40mps downloading something lmao
Lag has nothing to do with bandwidth, its latency
thank you for letting me buy the marksman i learned how to dead coin and destroy bosses all because of you terminal
@@lilithbeandude in Australia 40mbps is god speed. My entire life I’ve had 2 - 5 mbps and since moving out I’ve have 60 - 70 average and I’m basically a god among my friends with how quick I can download
@@master-d-baters6204same in Canada
We live in a world where a -10 ping could exist
Bros in the future
10 ping already exists
@@Alteris945 minus 10 ping you genius
@@Alteris945dingus
@@Alteris945 NEGATIVE 10 you doofus
5,000 missed calls from NASA and FBI CIA
someone finally got tired of server lag lol
The CIA operative waiting outside with a trained sniper. . .
"And this looks like a job for me!"
weird al's "party at the cia" intensifies...
“So everybody just follow me. Cause we need a little controversy, cause it feels so empty without me!”
CIA doesn't do the dirty work... They hire ex marines. 😅
@@GabrielHR55 ex?
are you sure?
the us gov't spends a lot of money training rangers, light infantry and reconnaissance units. not utilizing them would be stupid.
you can say whatever you want for the mental acuity of the leadership but cia has some competent case officers.
@@GabrielHR55 better; ex marines wouldnt be doing that work, they would be training terrorist or narco parties to do that job on demand.
Nobel Peace Prize for preventing toxic people from saying it was their internet
nah, it was to save a war profiteer's legacy
@@IanWaldrop if you actually look nobel invented TNT for quarry work.
@@joshschneider9766and it was used ONLY for quarry work.... Right? Right!!!???
@@japonieczpolski2903 no but that's not the point. Nobel was not a war profiteer and loathed the use of tnt for war so much he created the peace prize.
@@japonieczpolski2903 go virtue signal elsewhere troll.
I used to do tech support for T1 Lines. There are two types of internet. Their is home internet which is just scraps tossed to the peasants. Then there's the internet for the corporate sector. Speed and capacity are enormous. It's like comparing spitting on the ground to a fire hose.
You'll never be allowed to access the proper internet.
Impossible, if our devices even could handle all this speed, the bills would be higher than Burj Khalifa
Australia: yeah still only 10mbps mate take it or leave it
Legit dial up spec
@@statethis Not at all. 10mbps is 178 times faster than dial up. If something took 1 min to download at 10mbps, it would take almost 3hrs on dial up... And that's as long as no one picked up the phone and forced you to restart the download. I legitimately remember downloading a few songs off napster and having to start it at night with hopes it would be done by morning.
@@cloudyeightyapper
I get 800-1000 move to Sydney
@@swanny812dude the house prices tho
“So like, how many gigabits per second is that?”
“All of it”
Correction ALL OF IT
You know what I'ma leave this here just to show ppl how stupid I truly am
@@Extrelll love you bud, you ain’t stupid. But love the attitude
The internet box an hour later is gonna be Louder than a ps4
Bro I’m lagging!
Bros setup:
The government:”I gotta find a way to tax this”
I guess we can’t joke about the government anymore
Internet service itself isn’t taxed in the U.S. thankfully.
@@jacksonflaugher9167 yeah the internet service providing us internet bout to tax our ass
Its different when a company does it!
How naive can people be? How do you use internet now? Is it really free of charge? Don't think so😅 do you have a say if your Internet provider puts they're prices up? Don't think so either😅 aren't we meant to start to paying carbon tax? Don't we exhale carbon out ?? 😂😂😂
Oh no I get taxed womp womp womp
ISP's: "Not in YOUR house! Mwahahaha"
Most homes aren’t connected with fiber.
@@Deveonn Mine is, but I don’t think we’ll ever get that for a human price
@@Deveonn That is not true at all roughly 50% of homes in the U.S. are connected via Fiber-Optic.
@@lsksniper1936 that’s insanely high for a country with 300 million inhabitants. Not even the Netherlands with the biggest internet exchange reaches such numbers.
The Netherlands isn't that high in rankings. Look at pass-by. Yes, it's closer to 35% if you count all non-lined access but that's semantics because it would be impossible to implement that figure anyway. Spain, Portugal, Japan are all at 90% aggregate so regardless my point stands that "most homes" is an unrealistic statement.
Remember the guy that invented a car that ran on water? I do. And I ALWAYS will.
the internet providers have been real quiet since this dropped....
I'll believe when ppl actually get that speed. Not just government agencies
It doesn't really mean a whole lot in terms of bandwidth. The type of cable in the ground is what ultimately determines the bottleneck of network speed.
If your property still has copper cables, you're not going to experience any change.
As of last year, 75% of homes in the UK had access to gigabit fibre optic broadband.
That means around 1/4 of people in the country don't have access to fibre.
Even if they did utilise the upgrade, it just means they can cheap out more on networking. As of right now, one cable serves 32 homes at gigabit capacity.
This means they could charge more people for the same limited service.
@@tomd96 Let's also not forget that most of us don't have storage capable of speeds even remotely close to this.
Your typical 7200RPM HDD is looking at about 150 - 180MB/s, SATA SSDs are around 500, and M.2 SSDs can be about 5000MB/s or 5GB/s.
Having that kind of internet access is like owning a MacLaren F1 and keeping it on a 1000 square foot island.
Nobody will, those bands that the person used are reserved for military use only making this invention illegal
@@K-Anator I was just going to say this, the real bottle neck is going to be the hardware, from the routers to the devices, nothing on the consumer market is even remotely close to being able to make use of this.....
People won't because isps don't want that
They finna make the prices 1.2 million times higher🤣🤣
LOL
nah he deserves a noble piece prize, no more ppl blaming it on lag
Please give that man some kind of reward our respect isn't enough
I went from 10mbs to 2gb last year and I swear this shit is just outrageous.
How do you do it
Went from dsl on copper lines to gigabit internet on fiber
Guys imagine the company that charges the fair prices for that
@@werickgaminggamingandmore39 yea? i got offered 900GB speed last week for 30quid, idk why people are acting like this is fake xd
Just got done with a period of 1.5 Mbps 10 was a distant dream hahaha, glad your internet's better now :)
If anyone is wondering one of the original news of this was released on April 1st
Lmao jokes on us
Except there are news of this on March 28th. It looks legitimate.
@@Naruto31132 not saying this is one of these types of things but, the best pranks are usually prepared ahead of time.
I saw news of this in March also. But I think it was more along the lines of mid March not late.
Its the only way for this video to make any sense xD
300 Petabit per second is impossible with current technology lol
Spectrum: already thinking of ways to further monopolize prices on it
What most people do not understand: you still need to change a lot of stuff. You CAN keep the cable. But you still need to change the Routers, Firewalls, Servers and all this stuff. So no "using existing Infrastructur".
Love how he never mentions the actual person's name. Some credit you gave
Dr. Ian Phillips of Aston University, England
Yknow theres something known as google or just searching on internet
@@hareshravi78there’s such thing as giving credit.
@@hareshravi78 you know its still the courteous thing to do to mention the name of the person and/or provide sources for things, right?
@@hareshravi78 Ah yes, I shall go to google instead of hearing the name of the person from the person who's talking about him
Man, cant wait for that $34000 per month internet bill
the gig will be a standard, costing that 20 bucks a month type cheap... plus, most tech probably wont be able to handle the speeds given off from the internet.
@z-statusss1561 exactly. I have 1gig connection but my local network is fiber switches that can do 40. You can get like 200gbps switches but they're so expensive it's crazy. Like no normal person is spending 20k for their network setup lol its for server farms etc but im still excited
Yes and also there is limitations with your equipment, a pc has max 2.5 gigabit LAN, soon maybe 5 but you will be paying probably 500 plus for a motherboard with that capability. You could use a pcie card but itll cost you and you could saturate yoir lanes before getting close to 20 gigs. So this could be a good thing as companies will have 2 or 3 gig internet as there base speed which could potentially be like 30 a month, and there 100 200 600 ect will be massive money, but bog business will pay for it as the will need the bandwidth for there offices. Same as T1 vs home internet.
@@MercPunisher theres dozens of motherboards with 10gig nics now. Most come with 2.5gig standard. Only the cheapest have 1gig and you can get used 40gig pcie nic cards for like 100 bucks. But then you need a network switch capable of 40gbps. But 10gbps is on A LOT of am5 motherboards. 2.5 is def not the max in anyway and never was.
@@z-statusss1561no it'll stay at 100, why would they make it cheaper LOL
Germany meanwhile: Giga what? We only provide in Kilo Bits per Second.
my computer would explode trying to process the data on either end of that connection
Not only did you not credit the guy, you didn't even get the information right. Dr Ian Phillips is one of the Ashton University researchers to send data 4.5 million times faster than average broadband.
Thank you for not only calling out the zero credit given but leaving good information to go off of for those of us who once you go to the source and read the whole facts. I had no idea where to start but Dr. Ian Phillips gave me all the information I needed.
Thank u
I watched the original video where he credits him and explains how it works. I think this has been chopped and uploaded by someone else
Dude, thanks
Thank you bro it is honestly ridiculous how this guy can just post something this crazy without credit or atleast a news source or something
This is so unbelievably impressive! The only restriction are devices sending and receiving data though. our computer cannot process this much information in such quick succession or even write it to your hard drive. The server also cannot send this much data all at once.
Meaning _that one guy_ in every group call ever can’t complain about lagging anymore.
@@randomcrap7682idk what your reading gg but with the technology in our current time won’t keep up with this so it’s not going to be able to process even the internet because we don’t have stuff like enough data storage to process this so he probably will be able to complain with lag
So we definitely would need to upgrade to fast SSDs
Who cares about the speed when you have 0 latency
@@jamesbryan287 Nah an MFM HDD should do
*All the telecom companies hires Agent 47*
Comcast: well, we don't *need* to charge more, but who's gonna stop us?
Somehow I feel my 300Mbps is going to go from $92 a month to $192 a month 💀
They need to get that money back from you after you cut cable TV, so yeah. Too bad your regional monopoly keeps killing off startup competition that try to give you better internet. I'm sure they'd love you to vote in someone that would help with that, but so far we've all failed.
Lol I pay $7 for 400 mbps in India.
I pay 270 a month for 50 mb's a second
6$ for 500 mbps in Russia )
30€ for 100mbs in Germany💀
R.I.P he was a good guy 😭
wdym
@@user-su3qr1ll3w I think: bad things happen to good people because powerfull people make money from selling many people stuff. Rich people make money, not progress
Love how everyone knows what they're up to lol
@@user-su3qr1ll3whe passed away last month. We don’t know cause of death yet.
@@cestlavieeeeno way Fr?😂 not laughing at his death just how correct we might be
Bro wins in a online game before they land😂😂
Correction: there is some infrastructure change that’s required.
Current switches and such can’t emit the light and read it in the new frequencies. So those will have to be switched. But all the same fiber lines can be used, which is the harder and more expensive part to replace.
Germany in most regions:
Even if there is high speed internet over fiber optics we still trust in our trusty ol copper cables
Sure, because our corruption beats common sense
@@Spicy_Rikerdon't forget all the other problems... You doing good over there guys?
Yea I'll take fiber any day
@@tonyravioli1982the gov is the biggest problem wdym
Germany is still socialist
“You won’t need to replace anything. The price will just increase exponentially for no reason.”
At least y’all are civil in informing me, and that’s what I appreciates about ya.
Well... They would need to replace relays, sensors... Just not the fiber. Everything else would need to be changed
A transceiver for a 400gbit fiber connection costs you a few 1000 dollars and you need two of them to have a connection. Let alone the cost to upgrade all the backbone infrastructure for wich youd be paying your ass off to your isp (even if they wouldnt overcharge customers). Youd find that kind of speeds in an undersea cable where the cost of laying the cable is already astronomical.
@@aljodesign973 Don't undersea optical cables have boosters inline? So you would have to actually 'dig it up' and replace them to take advantage of this.
@@MuSic-ok7dh they do but as far as i know its not uncommon that the cables get a performance upgrade based on the headroom and capabilities of the used hardware and new technical advances. The reason why i took them as an example is because they are one example that comes to my mind where exotic technologies for maximising throughout actually come to use in an economicaly viable way
@@torstengang5521also research isn’t free. Why should they discover something and give it away for free. They are going to sell the information to companies and the companies are going to sell it to consumers.
and here im sitting , still having to fuck around with my 16K connection
Game companies brag about adding a slightly bigger speaker meanwhile this guy casually improved the internet without too much hassle
Meanwhile the CPU at 100% trying to make the SSD write as fast as possible
Thought the same…
I don’t think many people will understand this 🤣 but let the fantasy continue
I mean, it's still awesome knowing you're only limited by your hardware, no?
@@itsdavski2117this technology is not going to be running a direct line into your home, most people are not running fiber cards in their home desktop. This is going to be for upgrades to ISP and data center connections.
If you run parallel ports you can max out hard drives and basic SSDs already with the networking currently in your home so if this was a real issue we are already there.
@@Pr0x1m1f1c4710n Unless you have a quantum computer, no existing hardware could use even a fraction of that speed. So yeah, bigass goddamn limitation.
@@brunoactis1104big limitation sure
But even downloading at a couple gbs would be a huge improvement today
And over time our technology will catch up
Just something i wanna say, the human brain is 2.5 million gigs, that connection would download the human brain in 0.752 seconds 💀
Gigabit and gigabyte is different dawg
@cybersentient4758 a gigabyte is only 8 times more than a gigabit.
You wouldn't download a brain?!!!
@@smalltrashman4227so it would take about 6 seconds? That’s still really crazy tho
@@garf7298 Yes
Dude, beyond gaming this is huge for us as a society, information sharing and communication are going to be even faster and more accessible
Finally been waiting 25 years for someone to do this.
Australia: weeps in 12 Mbps
We can't have prisoners interacting with normal people.
Is it that bad in Australia
Regional Australia maybe? I live in a small city and get 100mps. And could get faster if I wanted to pay more.
@@shabahalramadYour funny fr
@@Sneakyboson qld suburbs I'm at 12 Mbps
Me with 200 PS3's running my computer: pathetic
What???
So your the guy the military gave the ps3 supercomputer too
@@extremedifficulty9786 i'm playing helldivers 2 with ultimate graphics rn
Now that ISPs are required to disclose true internet connection speeds, prices are going to start getting crazy.
The government has heard this and made sure to take care of it accordingly. Thank you for your continued service of providing crucial information.
That one guy on every FPS is still gonna "be lagging" tho
What if he actually is and just doesn't have fiber tho?
the company that charges the least for this is finna be rolling in cash
no. they will just be bought by the largest company. that's how capitalism works, large companies consolidate smaller companies to keep monopolies going
@@clown134as Long as the small business becomes rich I don’t care. A small business has the choice to not get bought, if I make a business and for example Microsoft offers me couple of millions, I would accept the offer, I don’t care if Microsoft controls the electric market if then I get to enjoy my freedom as a rich man living peaceful and investing the money smartly
@@user-pz4tx7if9d but… you don’t get to refuse their offers.
@@clown134no... that's not how capitalism works. Take a microeconomics course before you go online and make a fool of yourself
@@marcello9476 its how capitalism literally works every single day in practice. capitalism may look good on paper in a econ class, but in practice it results in monolopies
But here's the problem: That's work of a friend to the GREATEST TECHNICIAN THAT'S EVER LIVED.
Plot twist, they spent no money to make things faster, but they will charge you more money to make things faster
it needs new hardware, it costs money
He doesn’t need a Nobel peace prize. He deserves everything just he deserves it all.
Hey, brother. A nobel prize and a nobel peace prize are two different things.
@@user-xb7qo1gx7i what that’s the same word
@@Moon_dude_officalno
@@concept8192 oh, I just don’t realize the difference between them they look like the same word to me
@Moon_dude_offical how do you not see the word "peace" after one, but not the other??