Exactly. So the police chief and other members of law enforcement conspired (on recorded cam) to violate this woman and others. She was not told there was a camera. What a disgusting kind of assault. She's gonna break the bank, I hope.
@@andrewk8636 cops are just people. I have a friend who became a cop but when he was younger he did something I can't mention. He turned out to become a cop. I did the same except I got caught. He is no different from me yet he's a cop. See my point
He is cleaning up the department he just took over. More Police Chiefs need to be doing this and scrutinizing their officers instead of a thin blue line.
Speaking strictly though there is no expectation of privacy when on government property. I had a job with a federal office that got broken into 3 or more times (most likely by janitors, security of all people or maintenance. I lost a couple of personal items and probably $1,000 or more in federal property including a chair! I mean that is something you can easily carry and put in a car. After multiple times I routed security concerns to the security team at HQ and was told almost word for word that if I don't want something personal stolen to remove it from the site. oddly installing a full time camera let alone a hidden one is against policy without express written permission ahead of time. Once I noticed the office had been entered as I had implemented a DIY string intrusion detection system and notified security before touching the handle that they should get a fingerprint kit from the PD. As everyone on site has their fingerprints on file. Was yelled at for my Supervisor for that and not to bother security for useless issues. Also had the second highest person maybe third highest boss on my site for my division expressly say I should haver no expectation of privacy at any time on site. for any idiots of course bathrooms and the breastfeeding room would be off limits and have expectation of privacy.
@@ruledbysaturn I don’t think you read the full comment I made. Below the main text is a post statement saying “for any idiots of course the bathrooms and breast feeding room would be considered off limits” those are the only areas you can expect some privacy though technically it may be legal to have audio recording as creepy as that would be. As any other employee could walk in the bathroom as well and hear anything you say. The breastfeeding room would be the 100% private room as you would not have another woman walk in at the time your using the room.
@@ruledbysaturn not to say I agree with this as I don’t. This was wrong most likely. I don’t know what the report says but seems it may not been to see her undress. As they actually talked about aiming to see the screen which makes little sense. Like was it an undercover investigation? For not making proper reports or doing the job? Or was this just some weird sick spy cam for whatever reason.
@@philiplubduck6107 nobody was trying to see her undress. Its common that every room in a government installation is under 24 hour surveillance and not all the cameras are immediately visible. Like the other poster talked about there are very specific areas where an expectation of privacy is assumed but an office especially a shared space office is NOT an area of expected privacy in a government facility. Changing there is honestly inappropriate of the officers in the first place. Why are they not using the locker room or bathrooms like the other officers. This camera was clearly there to investigate corruption. Funny how the cops that saw it dont want to be recorded but they'll put up cameras anywhere and everywhere they can and tell people "if you dont have anything to hide you have nothing to worry about" almost makes you think these officers have more to hide than just them cheeks. Just saying...
Easy...... if you just wanted to catch a thief, you wouldn't need sound! They wanted to see what she did and what she said. The chief decided she was the crap in crap soup. He doesn't realize, if you smell crap wherever you work, it's probably you, chief!
@@lisagrafton2529 They're installing a camera. The person who said "do you want it to capture more of her computer" is asking a legitimate question. Nor is he part of any investigation, nor is he the person who will be watching any videos. It's a camera. It's hidden. It's purpose is to record the occupants of the room. What do you think it's there to see if roaches are crawling out of the vent? Maybe some Russian trained roach spies? Use your brain lady. When you install a camera and the guy you hired asks if you would like the camera to record more of the front room, or the screen to the right. He's asking you a question so you're not unsatisfied with the work he did. Please use your brain next time, this is how people spend their entire lives with disdain for an incident because they can't think for themselves. The woman also got fired for legitimate reasons. If someone lied about her not searching a suspect and charging him with incorrect or false charges, she would've had a million dollar lawsuit on her hands and multiple people would've been losing their jobs. Also it's all public information, you can read about her firing online. Again, *Use Your Brain.* State police found no wrong doing. City officials found no wrong doing. Before the woman even noticed the camera one of the guys complained about it and was told to not worry about it. Do you think the state police also hate this lady? They don't even know her. *Me* - Mam, would you like your surveillance camera to film less of *her* screen or more of the wall? *You* - Yeah more of her screen is good. *This lady* - OH MY GOD the camera positioned above my head to film the entire room and multiple computer *AND* the entrance was put there to spy on me! *TH-cam morons and the news* - Gasp. The IT guy asked if the camera meant to record the people and the property in the room should record her screen more clearly!! Omg omg. Hurry. Let's not use our brains and pretend they're all the same person and they all have ill intent. *USE YOUR BRAIN.* She was fired. She's mad. She's a bad police officer, it's a precinct riddled with problems and they wanted to catch the problems. Should it have been hidden? No. Was it illigal or wrong? No. The goal was to not alert them to see what laws they're willing to break, or what constitutional rights there violating from public citizens. Such as the person she violated and got fired for. They seen the camera, the gig is over. It's now in a public spot. If there was a problem, state police wouldn't say there isn't a problem.
@@lisagrafton2529 Also proving my point about you pretending all the men are the same person. You refer to the incident as *THEY* wanted to what she did and said. No. The police chief wanted to see what she did and said. You're stating the obvious without realizing how ridiculous you sound, while simultaneously trying to twist reality to fit a narrative that doesn't exist. This is why people are crazy today. Media and social media alike has people's brains spinning. No one knows what is what anymore. Media and social media aren't required to be ethical. They're not required to be logical. They're not required to be truthful. They're allowed to manipulate and deceive. You don't even know what you're saying anymore. They recording captured the IT guy asking if it should film her screen better. Everyone refers to that as a key point. Well what the heck should he have said then? God forbid he used her s pronoun, she's a female. Should he have asked if the camera should record more of *it's* screen? Is she an it now? You state the obvious while also trying to twist it. The camera was set there to record the occupants. It's a camera for Christs sake. And then you say they wanted to see what she did and what she said. As if for some reason that wasn't obvious... *ITS A CAMERA, NO SH_T THEY WANTED TO SEE WHAT SHE DID AND WHAT SHE SAID.* Question. The camera is still up.cshe doesn't work there. Are they trying to get a glimpse of an alternate dimension now? Maybe they want to see what she's doing in a timeline where she wasn't fired? Lmao! I can't. Imagine being a 6th grade drop out who is deaf and was raised in poverty. Yet somehow the able bodied people are all going nuts. I often cant help but assume it's because of my deafness. Because I don't have to listen to the bull crap you guys and the media spew out every day, all day. But the I catch myself and I remember. But this is all common sense. With a single functioning brain cell between a family of 4 I could still figure this all out. So what's the problem? Idk. I guess the camera that was placed to record people in the room and what they say is bad because it recorded people in the room and what they said. 👌 Lady. You're gonna give me a brain aneurysm. Stop it. 🤯
@@gixch maybe those who are having a problem with upholding the law within a pd then those in the pd shouldnt be able to exercise above the law attitudes and abilities till they are proven they aren't abusing their powers at all.
This mad true to. If u can't stop people at ur own office to stop steeling then u shouldn't be doing anything else important in this world. And damn sure not with a gun.
It's ridiculous the amount of hidden cameras that are turning up in all different kind of places..all for revenge purposes. No morals or ethics whatsoever. Love when vindictive cruel abuse of power people who know "people" get exposed like a roach at a raid parade. Love New Mexico. Deserves better then good ole boy mentalities running things.
These cops are supposed to be held to a higher standard and when breaking ANY laws should be doubly charged. Not found not guilty by other buddy cops. They need to be charged and convicted
They should not be charged twice as anyone else. They should be charged but just because you are police does not mean you give up your constitutional rights. I mean if we violate the 8th amendment then throw out that pesky constitution.
@@josephhodges9819 You do not have rights as a police officer because your paid for your service. For example a police officer doesn't have freedom of speech because all policies state an officer cannot swear or use threatening language while in uniform.
He was a new Police Chief and suspected illegal activity. He had every right to setup cameras in his own department. You might want to see the videos interviewing them officially during the investigation before passing judgement.
This is ridiculous. The whole policing system in America needs a major overhaul. How should they be allowed to investigate themselves? No knock warrants at 1am? The fact that your money,belongings or property can be seized if police merely suspect it’s tied to illegal activity? If you think these laws aren’t being abused by police you need to educate yourself.
Id have to see if she was actually changing, because I kind of dont buy it. I T would know if anything like that was on camera, (The servers record everything ) I dont see her case perusing any further unless she can prove she was actually violated and she' would need to provide the burden of proof
The Chief of Police did say one thing right, 'We hire other people's left-overs.' HE is certainly one of those left-overs. I guess there were no 'real 'Chief of Police out there to hire. He is a sad, sad, poor excuse for a human being.
It's a shared office. Not just her office. Why is she undressing in a shared office? The office had other cameras that were out of action and he recieved permission. This is ridiculous 🤣 why not look into the actual story before voicing your moronic opinion? This cop just wanted a quick buck on the taxpayers dime. ACAB but the chief is a bit less of one. Every other person in that office should report her for undressing in their workspace when theirs a locker room just feet away. A locker room with no cameras.
@@steven95N So, he had to hide the camera, made sure the blue light isn't shown and targeting her screen? Those officers have a right to privacy in that office by closing the door. It isn't a public space. He had no right. By the way, other officers changed in that office. It's in the video, or did you not bother to watch? 3:52
@@Subangelis It wasn't just her screen they were wanting to capture. Did you not hear the part where items are going missing? The chief is looking for a potentially crooked cop. As pointed out, it was a shared office, which means there is no expectation of privacy. That's what the locker room is for. Whether you like it or not, a boss can put a hidden camera in your private office if they choose to, to check up that you're doing your official duties and not inappropriately using resources for personal use. Lots of legitimate reasons a boss might want to seratiously keep an eye on an employee.
“To see if we can get a better view of her screen”. I doubt someone was like “let’s put on creep cam on lady cop”. There is no way she wasn’t suspected of doing something
@@tommytootone6448 we don't know enough to judge yet you say "there is no way she wasn't suspected of doing something" How is it two birds with one stone? The two birds would be monitoring her computer activity and creeping on her. Doesn't make sense at all.
Did this officer really believe that law enforcement would be held accountable?! 🤣 Now she knows how the majority of public feels about law enforcement.
This is why my older sibling couldn’t and also chose not to be become an officer last minute. Trained so hard, spent time getting strong and learning law and at the last minute realized how garbage and corrupt the system was and decided to pull out and start working to become a librarian instead. I’m actually surprised by my siblings actions because I’ve always been bullied by them.
@@_Chessa_ My grandma was an officer. She passed away 18 years ago. She would always talk about how officers are supposed to treat people with respect. She would cuss out officers, that would be caught violating peoples rights. They would feel the cringe when they found out that she use to be an officer. She never had to draw her weapon. My uncle was also an officer, he’s retired now. The both of them would always talk about respect and to treat people with respect. They never had to draw their weapons. Which is insane to me. I do believe that there are good officers out there, but they come far and few between. Majority of law enforcement weren’t raised properly though. I’m glad that your brother had the courage and strength to turn down something that he worked so hard for. When you know, you know.
@@_Chessa_ same for me. I wanted to be a hero who protected other and saved lives. Then I saw the evil from within, the corruption and criminal element in the legal gangs. 2 years of college for law enforcement wasted on a dream that would have been a nightmare. Though I became a security operations specialist and with 9 years experience I've save 9 lives. So I guess I am a hero after all. At least to the people I saved I guess 🤷
They bought a vent to replace a ceiling tile just to have a place to hide the camera. Remember that if an extra a/c vent appears in your office area. " I thought we only had one a/c vent in here yesterday?" Why was the camera hidden in the vent? Now a cameras is mounted out in the open on a wall. Why wasn't it installed out on the wall in the first place. Are they trying to bait the Sargent?
I did the Google thing and couldn't find anything on a civil suit. But their history is damn awful. Police chief prior was hired even though he was fired from his last job for lying, then they ended up firing him. Him and others to the years have been sued and fired for beating people amongst other things. The state of law enforcement.
Exactly! Any angle for this one... I do think the camera was targeted - but to catch her being lazy and incompetent. Not for the reason she is claiming.
@@PortCityBalrog that can’t be held against you in court though. If I’m doing dum sh*t in public and get caught that’s another story. I’m sure they have the capability of recording through your computer’s camera or iPad camera, or even through your stereo speakers if that stereo is hooked up to WiFi but I don’t worry about all of that. I couldn’t prove them doing it and it couldn’t be used against me anyway. There just too many people in this world for them to monitor like that so I just stay boring and if they was to check in on me, it wouldn’t last long until they moved onto the next person.
It's an office, not a bathroom, or locker room. No expectation of privacy. When I was a cashier at a popular department store, there was a camera over the register, as well as the product room in the back. They shouldn't be changing clothes in an office. If the chief is a perv, there will be other indications of that, likely in his private life as well. If guilty, he'll get his due, but this is not a crime.
It just seems so embarrassing the levels of corruption in the NM police departments and the sheriff's departments. I can't tell you how frustrating it is that this sort of thing happens with impunity and nothing ever happenes.
THERES NO SITUATION THAT EXIST THAT THE COWARDS THAT ARE THE TERRIFYINGLY IGNORANT COPS/ POLICE/LEO’s WILL NOT ESCALATE AND MAKE MUCH MUCH WORSE ! COPS HAVE ABSOLUTELY FAILED THIS COUNTRY AND ITS CITIZENRY IN EVERY WAY POSSIBLE !!!! PLEASE FOR YOUR SAFETY RECORD THEM ALWAYS AND RECORD FOR YOUR FELLOW CITIZENS !
@@rolandkennedy80 sorry but no. Sharp had something against her before this. She asked if she could breast feed her baby in there(with privacy). No one else know about the camera. In my state you have to put a sign outside warning about the Camera. Also since she was not notified about the camera or her being recorded in a private property area she had to be informed about the camera. If they had seen her change the most definitely should have told her that "hey we got a camera don't change here" sharp I'd definitely in the wrong
@@rolandkennedy80 He’s not allowed to surveil a building,even one he owns,in New Mexico without posting written statements that it is being recorded. Also if you’re literally told you can breast feed in your office,privacy is inferred.
👿😈🤬😠😡☠💀👿😈🤬😠😡 A coach and principal was fired after approval for installing cameras in both male and female locker rooms. They claimed it was for safety after teens complained of sexual harassment. Students and parents were never informed. They were both fired immediately after parents attornies filed suit and protested in front of school. Sad .. and very troubling. I always look for cameras I'm hotels and airbnbs .... got to be careful
We need to take serious the ego problem in law enforcement! We need to demand initial and ongoing screening for this. It's at the root of all evil they do. This man's ego was bruised because he didn't get his way. It's so bad, he held on to it until he was in a position of authority over her. I've never seen the media address the cause only the symptoms.
Ol’ Chief kept making reference to wanting the camera to capture “her” screen while they were installing the camera. I’m assuming computer screen? She shared the office with two males, so that seems pretty targeted towards the female. I’m pretty curious what that’s about. Either way, that’s pretty creepy as a supervisor. Or anyone really.
I recommend watching both interviews - the Sgt & the chief. They are available on Cop Watch's channel. The placement of the camera is questionable (but there is already a camera installed next to the vent which somehow became inoperable and un-fixable). This segment is loaded - so watch both and make your own mind up. She is also a demoted Sgt, who hides behind motherhood/being a woman to try and get special treatment... Obviously this does not reflect all women in law enforcement - I just think in this case she is using a dodgy camera placement to push out a chief who will have gotten rid of her & is now trying to get an angle.
The fact that the supervisors were fist fighting, one got fired off this camera for stealing, and it was wired into the same display that she watches to make sure no one's coming when she gets undressed in the office and leave the door open as she said she does in her interview tells me that this department has far more issues than a camera.
There is no law against monitoring spaces in a building you own in New Mexico, providing you post a warning that the space is under video and or audio surveillance. They made no mention of any such sign. To have surveillance without that warning, you need a warrant, even if it’s your own building. It appears officers changed in that space and at least one other officer was unaware of the camera. Certainly, if it’s your office and no one else is in it, you would expect that you could change your outfit without someone watching you. If you want to know what someone is doing on their computer, there’s this thing called a data logger which can monitor everything that goes on. Also, at my place of work everything goes through servers owned by my employer and there’s a record of every single transaction. So if the employee is using the system networks, there is no need for external monitoring at all. I feel we don’t know the entire story here and perhaps another investigation is warranted.
@@jaypeterson7642 uhhh no the state owns the building its public meaning the public can access it but it doesnt belong to the public...sorry but you are wrong it belongs to the state
There can be a sign anywhere visible near entrances or anywhere publicly visible that counts as notification for the entire space. In many places if consent is assumed at all, it is assumed under any legal circumstances for all parties.
@@EUCvibes not if you’re using the equipment of the entity doing the logging. If your employer provides you computer equipment and networks, you’ll see in the agreement you sign that the employer may be logging everything you do. That’s the practice where I work. Several criminals have been detected from the traces they left on the systems.
@@Popeyeschickenlover912 not shocked you don't know how deceptive the news can be. It wouldn't be the first time they lead their audience in the wrong direction
@@Popeyeschickenlover912 Then you should know she’s probably not changing in her office, and what secret squirrel means. All she’s saying is what everyone else knows, the news is ass now. Not reliable, not truthful, and always coming with some hidden agenda. Get outta here
White male 30-year Texas police officer here I can tell you exactly what it is he still did not like that his daughter apparently was found at fault in an accident that this female officer signed off on or was the investigator on and when he got to that department he decided I'm going to get back at her even though there's nothing to get back for but he decided to retaliate against her and set up that camera to get anything he can policy violation violation of the law whatever he can to try to force her out and that's what he did Her lawsuit needs to include official oppression and retaliation under color of law
You paid attention during English class. No wonder you're a cop. Also, why say you're white? Are you over or under 6 foot? Do you like sprinkles on your sundae or not? Add more irrelevant info, please.
This is a city office and not private and you have no expectations of privacy unless you are in a bathroom. Why would you change out and into your uniform when it's a city office. Should have a locker room or go to the men's or women's restroom.
Thank you and why did they keep repeating that it was a female sergeant. Like as if we should treat it differently it was a public office so she shouldn’t have been dressing there in the first place
@@PaulRubinoThe restroom is the only space in the whole building where there is an expectation of privacy. That would be considered an illegal recording.
@@jamessampson964 did everyone know, where their orders put out that said your only says change in designated areas, and they still should not have expected any kind of privacy because that is a public office
As she should. Maybe the other men who shared an office with her will sue as well. You know as well as anyone else, that man had it out for her. He was trying to set her up so he could fire her for any slip up. Petty people should never be in power.
Sued for what? She should have had no expectation of privacy and he was under no obligation to inform her she was being recorded. She can sue all she wants but it is going nowhere.
"it's like the CIA, when they've been through your shit you don't even know" Sergeant comes back and finds shit on her desk. And it's actually like Inspector Clouseau was in your office
Legally, there is no crime. As an employee of any business, you have no reasonable expectation of privacy and employers are allowed to monitor any place where business is being conducted. No bathroom, no personal phone access, etc. She has a way better case for wrongful termination for what clearly appears to be retaliation. Morally and ethically they are repugnant and I do believe it was placed there with malicious intent, but it's not what you know, it's what you can prove in court.
Ladies and gentlemen the location of the camera indicates a crime it is very simple. Where an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy they cannot legally be filmed or recorded
Sorry David but in no workspace should you have a reasonable expectation of privacy. The bathroom is not even a place you should expect privacy if it is a multi-person bathroom.
Also, publicly owned property is not private space nor suggests a place for private use. We people publicly fund these building therefore I could enter an open public space and film...
You don’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a work office wtf. You should expect to be recorded. Your interpretation of that law is completely wrong.
First of all it was not her office, it was a shared office. Secondly they were investigating criminal acts in the office by Fleet supervisors. One Supervisor was fired for stealing credit cards from others. Third in her interview she said she gets naked in the office to leave the door open and watches the cameras to make sure nobody walks in on her. That hidden camera was wired to the same display the camera she watches and she never noticed. Police supervisors are fist fighting in this office over who gets to use the bed and stealing credit cards but they weren't smart enough to notice the new camera on display in their office. In his interview the chief says the city hires The Unwanted officers from other departments and it's clear he's right.
The were fighting over the shift bid, not a bed. They were basically fighting over who would work which hours. I thought he said bed too at first but it was actually bid.
Yup! These reporters tell the story they want to tell! That's why I can't watch the news anymore. Not trustworthy. It's sickening seeing them not tell the entire story.
That’s shady as shit. Once they’re busted they install the camera in plain view. If that’s the case, why didn’t they do that in the first place. Damn perverts. That’s her personal office she could’ve been changing in there or putting on her uniform and still they’re going to install a camera in there. That’s some sick as shit!
She said she did change multiple times and they encouraged her to breast feed too! Not to mention the male officer that completely exposed himself without knowing the camera was there. This is some voyeuristic bs.
Yup you’re right what you’ve stated. The difference between a citizen and a dirty pig cop is. A dirty pig cop knows all the loopholes and elements of a crimes. And always skillfully finds loopholes to weasel his way out. Not to mention if you’re in the good-ole-boy system in law enforcement. Conducting an investigation by putting a hidden camera directly above her…YEAH RIGHT??? BS
Gross. When your Chief calls your department "Crap Soup" it's time to hire a new chief that will at least try to be constructive and not let the world know and his department know he lacks faith in his own subordinates. Not traits of a leader.
Why the hell is anyone changing in an office when they have changing rooms I don’t give a fucking shit about her rights should be not recorded in an office room not the changing room if the camera was in the changing room hidden then yes that would be a big issue put it in an office space it doesn’t matter that only one person work a shift it’s to someone is Office actually says it’s an office not the changing room with a computer inside Are you going to complain about the rest of the cameras around the station because they recording you oh what about going out and then getting told that you want the camera is turning off around the city or are you going to accept people who are citizens of the United States have the right without being bullied by the police to record your stops and you as a lawful reason you can’t have both
Gloria , It's Alleged, Just because she's a female doesn't make her words absolute. Cant play the female victim card on everything, because your feelings were hurt that you dont agree with. She should have filed a grievance and started an internal investigation. That would have been the proper channels to pursue something like this, and would have protected her job for whistleblowing.. Second this could be a motivation for retaliation for getting FIRED, Wonder what her service records would show about her conduct during her employment as an officer, for all we know she was a bully and Tyrant with the people
@@milesdyson5211 exactly what I was thinking about. I would like to know her personnel file and whatever else is releasable through an open records request. I’m going t start working on a request this evening, and hopefully will have some things soon. I’ll make a video when and if I am able to obtain any information on her, and any other person working at that department. Peace ☮️
Every time this guy opens his mouth he's lying just like every single cop I've been to court with three different cops... Every one of them sat on that stand and lied their ass off and I won the case all three times because of their lies and the rights that they violated
Do they hide them and not tell you that they are there? if so I got a excellent attorney for you if you find a hidden camera at your workplace that employees aren't informed of or are not in plain sight🤑🤑🤑🤑ie:hidden in vents,clocks ,furniture etc:you'll get paid big time,one party consent state's do not cover hidden camera's only speech.
@@tighecallahan965 Agree. The mistake was hiding the cam. My facility has hundreds of cameras, all in plain sight. (As far as I can tell). I think the reason this is a story is because in involves cops, who are not fond of accountability to begin with.
Your not too bright huh. They don't call them hidden cameras for nothing. Not a single damn thing wrong here. She's looking for a pay day. That is a 2.8 lens camera. WIDE ANGLED LENS in lamen terms. If she was targeted, they would have used a 3.8 or 9.22 lens and would only have covered her area for better resolution. She's a joke and so is the new channel.
I can understand putting cameras in the police office to make to make sure they're working but you went way out to bounce and hit the camera that's when you know they're trying to do something bad like not watch and see if they're working
If they caught her changing her clothes and still keep the camera a secret, pointed at the desk of the only female who uses the office consistently, then that's grounds for porn without consent. Filming people where they're KNOWN to change or relieve themselves, like dressing rooms and bathrooms but also offices (since the locker rooms are sometimes super uncomfortable). I think those men overheard a conversation about locking the office when no one's around so she could change privately, and they decided to film a peep show for themselves or possibly blackmail.
@@silverdrillpickle7596 Yes, filming people without their knowledge or consent for sexual and pornographic purposes. Like secret cameras in bathrooms, or anywhere else you know someone is exposing themselves privately like changing clothes or breastfeeding, ect.
The government investigated itself and its employee, and found no wrongdoing.
We've investigated ourselves and determined we are all heroes
They love to retaliatewhen file a complaint they are scared that’s why they try to get fire
Yup. I find that insane. Cops are the ONLY people in a job who can investigate themselves. How did we the people allow that
Exactly. So the police chief and other members of law enforcement conspired (on recorded cam) to violate this woman and others. She was not told there was a camera. What a disgusting kind of assault. She's gonna break the bank, I hope.
So why do you people NOT QUESTION the Voting system or who's counting the votes that lets those people in ?
If cops can't trust each other how do they expect the public to do so??
...with blind obedience
These are not the actions of all cops. These are just the nutcases that make good headlines
@@andrewk8636 cops are just people. I have a friend who became a cop but when he was younger he did something I can't mention. He turned out to become a cop. I did the same except I got caught. He is no different from me yet he's a cop. See my point
@@ppinmouth2649 😀
@@andrewk8636 no response?! How about an entire police force. One word should put it into your vision. Uvalde!!!!!!
"I ain't gonna sugarcoat it...we hire leftovers here."
Welp he just turned all his officers against him. They are going to LOVE hearing that.
"Crap soup."
He is cleaning up the department he just took over. More Police Chiefs need to be doing this and scrutinizing their officers instead of a thin blue line.
There should be cameras in every police station and each office including the chief! We need police to be held accountable for their illegal actions!
They can't afford a changing room?😂
Do you believe in unicorns, also? :-p
“Nothing improper” yet we just saw a man completely expose himself to a camera he had no clue about.
Speaking strictly though there is no expectation of privacy when on government property. I had a job with a federal office that got broken into 3 or more times (most likely by janitors, security of all people or maintenance. I lost a couple of personal items and probably $1,000 or more in federal property including a chair! I mean that is something you can easily carry and put in a car. After multiple times I routed security concerns to the security team at HQ and was told almost word for word that if I don't want something personal stolen to remove it from the site. oddly installing a full time camera let alone a hidden one is against policy without express written permission ahead of time. Once I noticed the office had been entered as I had implemented a DIY string intrusion detection system and notified security before touching the handle that they should get a fingerprint kit from the PD. As everyone on site has their fingerprints on file. Was yelled at for my Supervisor for that and not to bother security for useless issues. Also had the second highest person maybe third highest boss on my site for my division expressly say I should haver no expectation of privacy at any time on site.
for any idiots of course bathrooms and the breastfeeding room would be off limits and have expectation of privacy.
@@philiplubduck6107
Lol is that right? Even the bathrooms are surveilled.
@@ruledbysaturn I don’t think you read the full comment I made. Below the main text is a post statement saying “for any idiots of course the bathrooms and breast feeding room would be considered off limits” those are the only areas you can expect some privacy though technically it may be legal to have audio recording as creepy as that would be. As any other employee could walk in the bathroom as well and hear anything you say. The breastfeeding room would be the 100% private room as you would not have another woman walk in at the time your using the room.
@@ruledbysaturn not to say I agree with this as I don’t. This was wrong most likely. I don’t know what the report says but seems it may not been to see her undress. As they actually talked about aiming to see the screen which makes little sense. Like was it an undercover investigation? For not making proper reports or doing the job? Or was this just some weird sick spy cam for whatever reason.
@@philiplubduck6107 nobody was trying to see her undress. Its common that every room in a government installation is under 24 hour surveillance and not all the cameras are immediately visible.
Like the other poster talked about there are very specific areas where an expectation of privacy is assumed but an office especially a shared space office is NOT an area of expected privacy in a government facility. Changing there is honestly inappropriate of the officers in the first place. Why are they not using the locker room or bathrooms like the other officers.
This camera was clearly there to investigate corruption. Funny how the cops that saw it dont want to be recorded but they'll put up cameras anywhere and everywhere they can and tell people "if you dont have anything to hide you have nothing to worry about" almost makes you think these officers have more to hide than just them cheeks. Just saying...
“How can you prove our intentions?”
“It’s recorded on your hidden camera” 🤷🏼♂️
Probably just wanted to catch her shopping on amazon and facebooking all day! haha
Our taxes are paying these idiots to do nothing all day.
Easy...... if you just wanted to catch a thief,
you wouldn't need sound! They wanted to see what she did and what she said.
The chief decided she was the crap in crap soup. He doesn't realize, if you smell crap wherever you work, it's probably you, chief!
@@lisagrafton2529 They're installing a camera. The person who said "do you want it to capture more of her computer" is asking a legitimate question. Nor is he part of any investigation, nor is he the person who will be watching any videos.
It's a camera. It's hidden. It's purpose is to record the occupants of the room. What do you think it's there to see if roaches are crawling out of the vent? Maybe some Russian trained roach spies? Use your brain lady.
When you install a camera and the guy you hired asks if you would like the camera to record more of the front room, or the screen to the right. He's asking you a question so you're not unsatisfied with the work he did.
Please use your brain next time, this is how people spend their entire lives with disdain for an incident because they can't think for themselves. The woman also got fired for legitimate reasons. If someone lied about her not searching a suspect and charging him with incorrect or false charges, she would've had a million dollar lawsuit on her hands and multiple people would've been losing their jobs. Also it's all public information, you can read about her firing online. Again, *Use Your Brain.*
State police found no wrong doing. City officials found no wrong doing. Before the woman even noticed the camera one of the guys complained about it and was told to not worry about it.
Do you think the state police also hate this lady? They don't even know her.
*Me* - Mam, would you like your surveillance camera to film less of *her* screen or more of the wall?
*You* - Yeah more of her screen is good.
*This lady* - OH MY GOD the camera positioned above my head to film the entire room and multiple computer *AND* the entrance was put there to spy on me!
*TH-cam morons and the news* - Gasp. The IT guy asked if the camera meant to record the people and the property in the room should record her screen more clearly!! Omg omg. Hurry. Let's not use our brains and pretend they're all the same person and they all have ill intent.
*USE YOUR BRAIN.* She was fired. She's mad. She's a bad police officer, it's a precinct riddled with problems and they wanted to catch the problems.
Should it have been hidden? No. Was it illigal or wrong? No. The goal was to not alert them to see what laws they're willing to break, or what constitutional rights there violating from public citizens. Such as the person she violated and got fired for.
They seen the camera, the gig is over. It's now in a public spot. If there was a problem, state police wouldn't say there isn't a problem.
@@lisagrafton2529 Also proving my point about you pretending all the men are the same person. You refer to the incident as *THEY* wanted to what she did and said. No. The police chief wanted to see what she did and said.
You're stating the obvious without realizing how ridiculous you sound, while simultaneously trying to twist reality to fit a narrative that doesn't exist.
This is why people are crazy today. Media and social media alike has people's brains spinning. No one knows what is what anymore.
Media and social media aren't required to be ethical. They're not required to be logical. They're not required to be truthful. They're allowed to manipulate and deceive.
You don't even know what you're saying anymore. They recording captured the IT guy asking if it should film her screen better. Everyone refers to that as a key point.
Well what the heck should he have said then? God forbid he used her s pronoun, she's a female. Should he have asked if the camera should record more of *it's* screen? Is she an it now?
You state the obvious while also trying to twist it. The camera was set there to record the occupants. It's a camera for Christs sake. And then you say they wanted to see what she did and what she said. As if for some reason that wasn't obvious...
*ITS A CAMERA, NO SH_T THEY WANTED TO SEE WHAT SHE DID AND WHAT SHE SAID.*
Question. The camera is still up.cshe doesn't work there. Are they trying to get a glimpse of an alternate dimension now? Maybe they want to see what she's doing in a timeline where she wasn't fired?
Lmao! I can't. Imagine being a 6th grade drop out who is deaf and was raised in poverty. Yet somehow the able bodied people are all going nuts.
I often cant help but assume it's because of my deafness. Because I don't have to listen to the bull crap you guys and the media spew out every day, all day.
But the I catch myself and I remember. But this is all common sense. With a single functioning brain cell between a family of 4 I could still figure this all out. So what's the problem?
Idk. I guess the camera that was placed to record people in the room and what they say is bad because it recorded people in the room and what they said. 👌
Lady. You're gonna give me a brain aneurysm. Stop it. 🤯
“After investigating myself, I have found no ill intentions, therefor the matter is closed” - Police Chief
1st you need to define "what is a woman"....that chief needs to be fired!
If a PD is having issues w "theft", then maybe the PD shouldn't have authority over people.
OK. NO LAWS NOW. COOL!
@@gixch maybe those who are having a problem with upholding the law within a pd then those in the pd shouldnt be able to exercise above the law attitudes and abilities till they are proven they aren't abusing their powers at all.
LOL...easy right?
@@gixch no just not these idiot criminal "cops"
This mad true to. If u can't stop people at ur own office to stop steeling then u shouldn't be doing anything else important in this world. And damn sure not with a gun.
The crash with his daughter is why he had the hidden camera placed in her office. He knew exactly what he was doing.
Yup. Trying to find anything to get rid of her.
It's ridiculous the amount of hidden cameras that are turning up in all different kind of places..all for revenge purposes. No morals or ethics whatsoever. Love when vindictive cruel abuse of power people who know "people" get exposed like a roach at a raid parade. Love New Mexico. Deserves better then good ole boy mentalities running things.
Accountability at the workplace?!?!? For public officials?!?!?!?! The outrage! The scandal!!!
Kudos to the officer who spotted the camera. That's some level 💯 awareness right there.
These cops are supposed to be held to a higher standard and when breaking ANY laws should be doubly charged. Not found not guilty by other buddy cops. They need to be charged and convicted
They should not be charged twice as anyone else. They should be charged but just because you are police does not mean you give up your constitutional rights. I mean if we violate the 8th amendment then throw out that pesky constitution.
@@josephhodges9819 yes they should.
@@jamessampson964 no they should not
@@josephhodges9819 Then why are military charged under UCMJ And by state/federal?
@@josephhodges9819 You do not have rights as a police officer because your paid for your service. For example a police officer doesn't have freedom of speech because all policies state an officer cannot swear or use threatening language while in uniform.
As usual, the police investigated themselves and found no evidence of wrongdoing, and in fact determined themselves to be heroes.
Wow. What a massive breach of trust on the part of her leadership. Imagine how they “protect and serve” their citizens.
He was a new Police Chief and suspected illegal activity. He had every right to setup cameras in his own department. You might want to see the videos interviewing them officially during the investigation before passing judgement.
"We hire other people's leftovers." Well that is clearly what they did with you.
This is ridiculous. The whole policing system in America needs a major overhaul. How should they be allowed to investigate themselves? No knock warrants at 1am? The fact that your money,belongings or property can be seized if police merely suspect it’s tied to illegal activity? If you think these laws aren’t being abused by police you need to educate yourself.
@@MrJames6891 Who do you perceive me to be arguing with? This is my opinion which I am entitled to as you have posted yours.
@@MrJames6891 you need to educate yourself on constitutional rights and stop defending power drunk corrupt cops
Id have to see if she was actually changing, because I kind of dont buy it. I T would know if anything like that was on camera, (The servers record everything ) I dont see her case perusing any further unless she can prove she was actually violated and she' would need to provide the burden of proof
@@milesdyson5211 there’s literally a guy showing his whole blurred penis in this video on that camera when changing
She's whining about being treated like she treats civilians. There is no expectation of privacy in a public office, bathrooms yes.
The Chief of Police did say one thing right, 'We hire other people's left-overs.' HE is certainly one of those left-overs. I guess there were no 'real 'Chief of Police out there to hire. He is a sad, sad, poor excuse for a human being.
That's insulting to left overs!
He’s an embarrassment and has no self respect or integrity.
It's a shared office. Not just her office. Why is she undressing in a shared office? The office had other cameras that were out of action and he recieved permission. This is ridiculous 🤣 why not look into the actual story before voicing your moronic opinion? This cop just wanted a quick buck on the taxpayers dime. ACAB but the chief is a bit less of one.
Every other person in that office should report her for undressing in their workspace when theirs a locker room just feet away. A locker room with no cameras.
@@steven95N So, he had to hide the camera, made sure the blue light isn't shown and targeting her screen? Those officers have a right to privacy in that office by closing the door. It isn't a public space. He had no right.
By the way, other officers changed in that office. It's in the video, or did you not bother to watch? 3:52
@@Subangelis It wasn't just her screen they were wanting to capture.
Did you not hear the part where items are going missing? The chief is looking for a potentially crooked cop.
As pointed out, it was a shared office, which means there is no expectation of privacy. That's what the locker room is for. Whether you like it or not, a boss can put a hidden camera in your private office if they choose to, to check up that you're doing your official duties and not inappropriately using resources for personal use. Lots of legitimate reasons a boss might want to seratiously keep an eye on an employee.
“To see if we can get a better view of her screen”. I doubt someone was like “let’s put on creep cam on lady cop”. There is no way she wasn’t suspected of doing something
there is software to monitor online actions if thats what they wanted to see
@@awesomerieawesome2144 2 birds one stone. I can’t say they weren’t trying to creep on lady. U can’t say she’s innocent. We don’t know enough to judge
@@tommytootone6448 we don't know enough to judge yet you say "there is no way she wasn't suspected of doing something" How is it two birds with one stone? The two birds would be monitoring her computer activity and creeping on her. Doesn't make sense at all.
Maybe that lady will realize her line of work employs the worst of humanity and think twice about supporting government
Did this officer really believe that law enforcement would be held accountable?! 🤣 Now she knows how the majority of public feels about law enforcement.
Back the blue until it happens to you!
It's messed up but nothing will change until they start to destroy themselves. Good.
This is why my older sibling couldn’t and also chose not to be become an officer last minute. Trained so hard, spent time getting strong and learning law and at the last minute realized how garbage and corrupt the system was and decided to pull out and start working to become a librarian instead. I’m actually surprised by my siblings actions because I’ve always been bullied by them.
@@_Chessa_ My grandma was an officer. She passed away 18 years ago. She would always talk about how officers are supposed to treat people with respect. She would cuss out officers, that would be caught violating peoples rights. They would feel the cringe when they found out that she use to be an officer. She never had to draw her weapon. My uncle was also an officer, he’s retired now. The both of them would always talk about respect and to treat people with respect. They never had to draw their weapons. Which is insane to me. I do believe that there are good officers out there, but they come far and few between. Majority of law enforcement weren’t raised properly though. I’m glad that your brother had the courage and strength to turn down something that he worked so hard for. When you know, you know.
@@_Chessa_ same for me. I wanted to be a hero who protected other and saved lives. Then I saw the evil from within, the corruption and criminal element in the legal gangs. 2 years of college for law enforcement wasted on a dream that would have been a nightmare.
Though I became a security operations specialist and with 9 years experience I've save 9 lives. So I guess I am a hero after all. At least to the people I saved I guess 🤷
They bought a vent to replace a ceiling tile just to have a place to hide the camera. Remember that if an extra a/c vent appears in your office area. " I thought we only had one a/c vent in here yesterday?" Why was the camera hidden in the vent? Now a cameras is mounted out in the open on a wall. Why wasn't it installed out on the wall in the first place. Are they trying to bait the Sargent?
Calling your fellow officers "crap soup" isnt gonna get you much respect chief
Police chief like" at least they didn't find the one in the toilet" 🤔
I did the Google thing and couldn't find anything on a civil suit. But their history is damn awful. Police chief prior was hired even though he was fired from his last job for lying, then they ended up firing him. Him and others to the years have been sued and fired for beating people amongst other things. The state of law enforcement.
WOW
It was a shared office. Not just her office! She already has so many lawsuits against the city.
Exactly! Any angle for this one... I do think the camera was targeted - but to catch her being lazy and incompetent. Not for the reason she is claiming.
@@zerotosixtyboss3024 Locker Rooms are for getting naked.. Not an office open to others..
You should always conduct yourself as if you’re being recorded the moment you step foot out of your house.
You are delusional if you think you are not being recorded inside your house as well....
@@PortCityBalrog that can’t be held against you in court though. If I’m doing dum sh*t in public and get caught that’s another story. I’m sure they have the capability of recording through your computer’s camera or iPad camera, or even through your stereo speakers if that stereo is hooked up to WiFi but I don’t worry about all of that. I couldn’t prove them doing it and it couldn’t be used against me anyway. There just too many people in this world for them to monitor like that so I just stay boring and if they was to check in on me, it wouldn’t last long until they moved onto the next person.
It's an office, not a bathroom, or locker room. No expectation of privacy. When I was a cashier at a popular department store, there was a camera over the register, as well as the product room in the back. They shouldn't be changing clothes in an office. If the chief is a perv, there will be other indications of that, likely in his private life as well. If guilty, he'll get his due, but this is not a crime.
It just seems so embarrassing the levels of corruption in the NM police departments and the sheriff's departments. I can't tell you how frustrating it is that this sort of thing happens with impunity and nothing ever happenes.
Camera was setup to find illegal activity.
You do realize the monitors to the cameras were there for every officer to see it was never hidden
Hey, Jim, notice the extreme bootlickers. They are why the USA is so messed up.
When cops break the law claiming its for our own good, fire that creep.
THERES NO SITUATION THAT EXIST THAT THE COWARDS THAT ARE THE TERRIFYINGLY IGNORANT COPS/ POLICE/LEO’s WILL NOT ESCALATE AND MAKE MUCH MUCH WORSE ! COPS HAVE ABSOLUTELY FAILED THIS COUNTRY AND ITS CITIZENRY IN EVERY WAY POSSIBLE !!!! PLEASE FOR YOUR SAFETY RECORD THEM ALWAYS AND RECORD FOR YOUR FELLOW CITIZENS !
This is as creepy and grimy as it gets…
She should get millions for this…
They’ll throw tax payer funds at this and deny accountability as they always do.
They should buy a restroom or changing room....just an IDEA. ..😂😂
This is sickening.
Yes she definitely is
Not sickening at all when he is allowed to. Its not her office. Other ppl are there too. Plus its paid for by tax payer money
@@rolandkennedy80 sorry but no. Sharp had something against her before this. She asked if she could breast feed her baby in there(with privacy). No one else know about the camera. In my state you have to put a sign outside warning about the Camera. Also since she was not notified about the camera or her being recorded in a private property area she had to be informed about the camera. If they had seen her change the most definitely should have told her that "hey we got a camera don't change here" sharp I'd definitely in the wrong
@@rolandkennedy80 He’s not allowed to surveil a building,even one he owns,in New Mexico without posting written statements that it is being recorded. Also if you’re literally told you can breast feed in your office,privacy is inferred.
@@rolandkennedy80 he’s allowed to? Are you dumb? That’s rhetorical. I know you are
👿😈🤬😠😡☠💀👿😈🤬😠😡
A coach and principal was fired after approval for installing cameras in both male and female locker rooms. They claimed it was for safety after teens complained of sexual harassment.
Students and parents were never informed.
They were both fired immediately after parents attornies filed suit and protested in front of school.
Sad .. and very troubling.
I always look for cameras I'm hotels and airbnbs .... got to be careful
We need to take serious the ego problem in law enforcement! We need to demand initial and ongoing screening for this. It's at the root of all evil they do. This man's ego was bruised because he didn't get his way. It's so bad, he held on to it until he was in a position of authority over her. I've never seen the media address the cause only the symptoms.
Ol’ Chief kept making reference to wanting the camera to capture “her” screen while they were installing the camera. I’m assuming computer screen? She shared the office with two males, so that seems pretty targeted towards the female. I’m pretty curious what that’s about.
Either way, that’s pretty creepy as a supervisor. Or anyone really.
Also IT can see what you've been doing on the computer so there's that. No need to record.
I recommend watching both interviews - the Sgt & the chief. They are available on Cop Watch's channel. The placement of the camera is questionable (but there is already a camera installed next to the vent which somehow became inoperable and un-fixable).
This segment is loaded - so watch both and make your own mind up.
She is also a demoted Sgt, who hides behind motherhood/being a woman to try and get special treatment... Obviously this does not reflect all women in law enforcement - I just think in this case she is using a dodgy camera placement to push out a chief who will have gotten rid of her & is now trying to get an angle.
@@KazeHorse agree with you!
@Oddity I don’t need to. He was found not guilty by state police - so you’ll just have to swallow that big ol’ pill.
The fact that the supervisors were fist fighting, one got fired off this camera for stealing, and it was wired into the same display that she watches to make sure no one's coming when she gets undressed in the office and leave the door open as she said she does in her interview tells me that this department has far more issues than a camera.
I hope everyone he works with hears him call them a “crap soup.”
He shouldn't have put a camera in the vent, but I believed him when he said he was given a crap soup to manage.
Why was she getting undressed in her office? That makes no sense.
Cops proving to all of us just what they are like!!
Sure sounds like a cover up. They were definitely trying to get dirt on her maybe others, the chief is definitely a liar by his own actions.
Wow, what a disappointment. Please file charges and our judge needs to put him in jail…
She obviously did something to be investigated. It's not a private area. Why is she changing there for?
There is no law against monitoring spaces in a building you own in New Mexico, providing you post a warning that the space is under video and or audio surveillance. They made no mention of any such sign.
To have surveillance without that warning, you need a warrant, even if it’s your own building. It appears officers changed in that space and at least one other officer was unaware of the camera. Certainly, if it’s your office and no one else is in it, you would expect that you could change your outfit without someone watching you.
If you want to know what someone is doing on their computer, there’s this thing called a data logger which can monitor everything that goes on. Also, at my place of work everything goes through servers owned by my employer and there’s a record of every single transaction. So if the employee is using the system networks, there is no need for external monitoring at all.
I feel we don’t know the entire story here and perhaps another investigation is warranted.
a public building is not owned by the police departments chief. they work there THEY DO NOT OWN PUBLIC PROPERTY IT IS WE THE PEOPLE WHO OWN IT !
@@jaypeterson7642 uhhh no the state owns the building its public meaning the public can access it but it doesnt belong to the public...sorry but you are wrong it belongs to the state
There can be a sign anywhere visible near entrances or anywhere publicly visible that counts as notification for the entire space. In many places if consent is assumed at all, it is assumed under any legal circumstances for all parties.
@@EUCvibes not if you’re using the equipment of the entity doing the logging. If your employer provides you computer equipment and networks, you’ll see in the agreement you sign that the employer may be logging everything you do. That’s the practice where I work. Several criminals have been detected from the traces they left on the systems.
@King DJ what such people forget is that there’s always a higher authority.
I've learned to wait for all the facts before jumping to conclusions.
@@Popeyeschickenlover912 not shocked you don't know how deceptive the news can be. It wouldn't be the first time they lead their audience in the wrong direction
@@Popeyeschickenlover912 Then you should know she’s probably not changing in her office, and what secret squirrel means. All she’s saying is what everyone else knows, the news is ass now. Not reliable, not truthful, and always coming with some hidden agenda. Get outta here
@@Popeyeschickenlover912 all I'm saying is I'm not going to rush to judgement. Not sure why you personally would have a problem with that.
@@Popeyeschickenlover912 thanks, will do sweet cheeks
Lol you are insane
This is how corrupt the system is
Yet they got so upset when an auditor has a camera and is recording them in public. These guys earned their moniker
White male 30-year Texas police officer here
I can tell you exactly what it is he still did not like that his daughter apparently was found at fault in an accident that this female officer signed off on or was the investigator on and when he got to that department he decided I'm going to get back at her even though there's nothing to get back for but he decided to retaliate against her and set up that camera to get anything he can policy violation violation of the law whatever he can to try to force her out and that's what he did
Her lawsuit needs to include official oppression and retaliation under color of law
Official oppression under the law… tells me your not a 30 year police vet in Texas,
retaliation under color of law wtf 😭
Thank you for explaining.
You paid attention during English class. No wonder you're a cop. Also, why say you're white? Are you over or under 6 foot? Do you like sprinkles on your sundae or not? Add more irrelevant info, please.
@@BR-it2qe probably because his race is relevant to a lot of people outside of yourself when he states he is a cop.
This is a city office and not private and you have no expectations of privacy unless you are in a bathroom. Why would you change out and into your uniform when it's a city office. Should have a locker room or go to the men's or women's restroom.
Thank you and why did they keep repeating that it was a female sergeant. Like as if we should treat it differently it was a public office so she shouldn’t have been dressing there in the first place
Now she knows how the public feels when cops investigate themselves and find they did nothing wrong.
This chief needs to go
"We investigated ourselves and found we did nothing wrong."
What crime did he break? NM is a one-party consent state.
@@josephhodges9819 What ever law would prevent him from putting camera's in the ladies room.
@@PaulRubinoThe restroom is the only space in the whole building where there is an expectation of privacy. That would be considered an illegal recording.
@@josephhodges9819 when everyone knows that officers change clothes in that room did they have an expectation of privacy. Badge bunny
@@jamessampson964 did everyone know, where their orders put out that said your only says change in designated areas, and they still should not have expected any kind of privacy because that is a public office
She’ll probably get a payout.
As she should. Maybe the other men who shared an office with her will sue as well. You know as well as anyone else, that man had it out for her. He was trying to set her up so he could fire her for any slip up. Petty people should never be in power.
She should take Chief's job,he's a disgrace.
An average citizen would be charged with SOMETHING indefinitely.
this is SO wrong...now she have to check the room everyday when she goes to her office! I feel bad for her, including lost trust!
When the head of a police department can control that much power it changes from a protective service to a predatory service
Wow this dude just belittled all cops in that department saying there crap soup
Yeah...not too smart a chief, is he?? The only crap here is himself, and the NM State police crap investigation .
Sue for twenty millions dollars 💸
Fire those evil cop’s!!!!!
If this case were the other way around the chief would accuse the department of racism.
someone needs to tell this chief ALL LIVES MATTER
You are so right.
If I investigated myself then I’d be able to find myself of no wrong doing. Because in our own eyes, our actions do no harm.
That’s crazy!!!!
Out of state FBI agents should investigate every cop suspected of wrongdoing
Hope she wins big time with him being charged and sued. Then all the others that was on here.
Sued for what? She should have had no expectation of privacy and he was under no obligation to inform her she was being recorded. She can sue all she wants but it is going nowhere.
No trust? No honor amongst thieves?
That was by far the least hidden hidden camera I've ever seen in my entire life.
that's not the chief and the LT fault she and other officers are changing in an officer public space.
Hiding the camera says a lot
looking for a thief,you hide cameras.
Can't trust no one not even a cop damn how sad theses so called protectors NOT!!
The real question is who changes clothes in their office at a police station 🤣
Definitely did invade her rights
"it's like the CIA, when they've been through your shit you don't even know"
Sergeant comes back and finds shit on her desk.
And it's actually like Inspector Clouseau was in your office
inspector CLOUSEAU, i see
She needs to skip the voyeurism aspect, and take it to the FBI for federal wiretapping charges.
theyre going to eat that case up like 120 proof liquor
That is so unbelievably f’d up
Legally, there is no crime. As an employee of any business, you have no reasonable expectation of privacy and employers are allowed to monitor any place where business is being conducted. No bathroom, no personal phone access, etc.
She has a way better case for wrongful termination for what clearly appears to be retaliation. Morally and ethically they are repugnant and I do believe it was placed there with malicious intent, but it's not what you know, it's what you can prove in court.
That's sickening. What kind of kangaroo police station is it? If there's going to be a camera, people need to know it.
Why investigate knowing you are not going to hold the Chief and others accountable?! He has a grudge and mistreated her.
gotta love when the government investigates itself lmaoo "nothing to see here"
our office just puts them in plain view. LOL
Ladies and gentlemen the location of the camera indicates a crime it is very simple. Where an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy they cannot legally be filmed or recorded
Sorry David but in no workspace should you have a reasonable expectation of privacy. The bathroom is not even a place you should expect privacy if it is a multi-person bathroom.
Also, publicly owned property is not private space nor suggests a place for private use. We people publicly fund these building therefore I could enter an open public space and film...
it is not a crime to put a camera in a work office.
You don’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a work office wtf. You should expect to be recorded. Your interpretation of that law is completely wrong.
I agree there was an expectation of privacy. They even told her she could pump in there.
First of all it was not her office, it was a shared office. Secondly they were investigating criminal acts in the office by Fleet supervisors. One Supervisor was fired for stealing credit cards from others. Third in her interview she said she gets naked in the office to leave the door open and watches the cameras to make sure nobody walks in on her. That hidden camera was wired to the same display the camera she watches and she never noticed.
Police supervisors are fist fighting in this office over who gets to use the bed and stealing credit cards but they weren't smart enough to notice the new camera on display in their office. In his interview the chief says the city hires The Unwanted officers from other departments and it's clear he's right.
The were fighting over the shift bid, not a bed. They were basically fighting over who would work which hours. I thought he said bed too at first but it was actually bid.
It’s still an invasion of privacy
@@isaacscott1063 maybe they put it in the locker room but they didn't.
Yup! These reporters tell the story they want to tell! That's why I can't watch the news anymore. Not trustworthy. It's sickening seeing them not tell the entire story.
@@isaacscott1063 Not if they are aware that cameras are there. The reporter fails to mention that they signed something.
This is exact why I ALWAYS check for hidden cameras in hotel rooms. Trust NO ONE
Lol no whacking it in the office.they would have caught me 😂😂
That’s shady as shit. Once they’re busted they install the camera in plain view. If that’s the case, why didn’t they do that in the first place. Damn perverts. That’s her personal office she could’ve been changing in there or putting on her uniform and still they’re going to install a camera in there. That’s some sick as shit!
She said she did change multiple times and they encouraged her to breast feed too! Not to mention the male officer that completely exposed himself without knowing the camera was there. This is some voyeuristic bs.
Yup you’re right what you’ve stated. The difference between a citizen and a dirty pig cop is. A dirty pig cop knows all the loopholes and elements of a crimes. And always skillfully finds loopholes to weasel his way out. Not to mention if you’re in the good-ole-boy system in law enforcement. Conducting an investigation by putting a hidden camera directly above her…YEAH RIGHT??? BS
Gross. When your Chief calls your department "Crap Soup" it's time to hire a new chief that will at least try to be constructive and not let the world know and his department know he lacks faith in his own subordinates. Not traits of a leader.
By placing the camera, it sounds like they were investigating something specific but there is no mention of that.
The State agent whom signed off on that needs to be sued into homelessness.
Why the hell is anyone changing in an office when they have changing rooms
I don’t give a fucking shit about her rights should be not recorded in an office room not the changing room if the camera was in the changing room hidden then yes that would be a big issue put it in an office space it doesn’t matter that only one person work a shift it’s to someone is Office actually says it’s an office not the changing room with a computer inside
Are you going to complain about the rest of the cameras around the station because they recording you oh what about going out and then getting told that you want the camera is turning off around the city or are you going to accept people who are citizens of the United States have the right without being bullied by the police to record your stops and you as a lawful reason you can’t have both
Shut up up!!!!
I am So Sorry this happened to You Ms. Torres. Stay Strong Officer ✊🏼
Gloria , It's Alleged, Just because she's a female doesn't make her words absolute. Cant play the female victim card on everything, because your feelings were hurt that you dont agree with. She should have filed a grievance and started an internal investigation. That would have been the proper channels to pursue something like this, and would have protected her job for whistleblowing.. Second this could be a motivation for retaliation for getting FIRED, Wonder what her service records would show about her conduct during her employment as an officer, for all we know she was a bully and Tyrant with the people
@@milesdyson5211 exactly what I was thinking about. I would like to know her personnel file and whatever else is releasable through an open records request. I’m going t start working on a request this evening, and hopefully will have some things soon. I’ll make a video when and if I am able to obtain any information on her, and any other person working at that department. Peace ☮️
Poor thing. How will she ever get through this? Shes paralyzed for life! She'll never walk again because a camera exists.
@@craftycriminalistwithms.z3053 Did you make the video
@@craftycriminalistwithms.z3053 Did you make the video?
Crooked Female cop being caught out. And didn't like it
Every time this guy opens his mouth he's lying just like every single cop I've been to court with three different cops... Every one of them sat on that stand and lied their ass off and I won the case all three times because of their lies and the rights that they violated
They have cameras were I work,, what a bunch of bs
Do they hide them and not tell you that they are there? if so I got a excellent attorney for you if you find a hidden camera at your workplace that employees aren't informed of or are not in plain sight🤑🤑🤑🤑ie:hidden in vents,clocks ,furniture etc:you'll get paid big time,one party consent state's do not cover hidden camera's only speech.
@@tighecallahan965 Agree. The mistake was hiding the cam. My facility has hundreds of cameras, all in plain sight. (As far as I can tell). I think the reason this is a story is because in involves cops, who are not fond of accountability to begin with.
Your not too bright huh. They don't call them hidden cameras for nothing. Not a single damn thing wrong here. She's looking for a pay day. That is a 2.8 lens camera. WIDE ANGLED LENS in lamen terms. If she was targeted, they would have used a 3.8 or 9.22 lens and would only have covered her area for better resolution. She's a joke and so is the new channel.
Its a 1 party consent state and its not a bathroom, which is a personal room.
“Her office.” This is a shared space, you can see the other desks on the camera footage.
I can understand putting cameras in the police office to make to make sure they're working but you went way out to bounce and hit the camera that's when you know they're trying to do something bad like not watch and see if they're working
Everyone should go watch the interview the state Police released.
This was a long story to end with “no crime was committed” . Just because someone’s feelings were hurt doesn’t mean it’s illegal
Said the guy with no legal theory to back up his stupid comment.
If they caught her changing her clothes and still keep the camera a secret, pointed at the desk of the only female who uses the office consistently, then that's grounds for porn without consent. Filming people where they're KNOWN to change or relieve themselves, like dressing rooms and bathrooms but also offices (since the locker rooms are sometimes super uncomfortable). I think those men overheard a conversation about locking the office when no one's around so she could change privately, and they decided to film a peep show for themselves or possibly blackmail.
@@WaryJester They even encouraged her to breastfeed which infers she will have privacy.
@@WaryJester
“Porn without consent…”?
That’s a new one
@@silverdrillpickle7596 Yes, filming people without their knowledge or consent for sexual and pornographic purposes. Like secret cameras in bathrooms, or anywhere else you know someone is exposing themselves privately like changing clothes or breastfeeding, ect.
He calls the cops serving under him "leftovers others won't take" and "crap soup" lol
Wow this is obvious harassment that man should be fired and arrested along with the men he had in the office with him.