Mono-Red Storm | MTG Historic | Budget Magic

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 218

  • @ValakutTheMoltenPineapple
    @ValakutTheMoltenPineapple 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Seth in Multiplayer formats: "I wouldn't hurt a fly I just want to draw cards"
    Seth in 60 card formats: "I like that the grapeshot animation is slow cause it rubs it in to our opponent while they die"

  • @tuliolemos7997
    @tuliolemos7997 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I'm Xinbas, (match 3, hatebears)
    In the first game I had a perfect hand, my game developed without much difficulty, but I didn't understand what I was facing, I thought it was a big red deck
    I side wrong an in the second keep a very risky hand with only 2 plains, it took me a long time to buy the 3th land, i had 2 CoCo but the deck didn't move.
    In the third i just couldn't do anything against the combo.
    it was a good game and a pleasure to play with you!
    Hi from a Brazilian fan here!

  • @jorzolek01
    @jorzolek01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +122

    I can imagine Seth’s girlfriend saying you never get that excited for me at the end of that first match.

  • @miguelfreitas5343
    @miguelfreitas5343 3 ปีที่แล้ว +109

    Storm will never die!!!
    Also... Only now did I realize that you're the reason I thought that card was called Grinning Ingus, instead of the real name that is Grinning *Ignus* ... So thanks, Seth 😂😂

    • @NY-nx9es
      @NY-nx9es 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Also its binding the old gods not binding OF the old gods

    • @atlys258
      @atlys258 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      After years of watching Seth's content, I can confidently say that the real name of any given card is whatever Seth says it is, sometimes that name might even change a couple times a game. 🤣
      He'd do very well for himself working for a Witness Protection Program.

    • @miguelfreitas5343
      @miguelfreitas5343 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NY-nx9es damn o_O I legit never realize that...

  • @gotchab003
    @gotchab003 3 ปีที่แล้ว +100

    Seth, at this point I don't even need you to pronounce it right, I just need you to at least aknowledge that you are aware it's called Ignus, not Ingus.

  • @thatoneguy1991able
    @thatoneguy1991able 3 ปีที่แล้ว +111

    Ig - nus! IG-NUS!! IT ISN’T INGUS, YOU DINGUS! 😂

    • @Cornelius135
      @Cornelius135 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Dignus*

    • @jesussuperstar3406
      @jesussuperstar3406 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      amongus?

    • @ethanleon7775
      @ethanleon7775 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Egg

    • @TheFluke32
      @TheFluke32 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, Tomer also calls it Ingus too. I dont blame him anymore, if there are people around Seth who reinforce the impression that Ignus being spoken as Ingus.

  • @gabrielmariz9610
    @gabrielmariz9610 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    LOOOL the triple grapeshot was incredible

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      For exacies!

    • @Morskk
      @Morskk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This gabriel dont know anything about magic

  • @primedialga
    @primedialga 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    best/worst part is, that you can't even concede, if there are no actions to be taken and lethal is on the stack

  • @BoardInMpls
    @BoardInMpls 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seth I work my ass off and and I am attending school full time, so no time for magic. I just wanted to say your videos bring me a lot of joy and relaxation and I appreciate you.

  • @Zanthosus
    @Zanthosus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Is 3 alot?
    Seth: "That depends. Grapeshot, no. My opponents' things, yes."

  • @pletes100
    @pletes100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's genuinely fun to see you so excited to make this work! That being said, I was hoping the whole time that this would fail.

  • @stormtrooper3978
    @stormtrooper3978 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As a Storm lover, watching you getting so excited about casting grapeshot for lethal like it was Christmas it's been priceless!
    As far as the deck goes, though, for a non-budget version I think a second color as a support might be needed in order to fight better against opponents' hate pieces.
    Anyways, great content as always, thanks!

  • @jekanyika
    @jekanyika 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I'm glad I already have most of the cards thanks to Memekin being my go to deck.

  • @sharlockshacolmes9381
    @sharlockshacolmes9381 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Aaaaand the misnamed card of the day is greening *ingus* .

  • @phelandiller4066
    @phelandiller4066 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Hi-storm-ic if you will...

    • @sam-wv2ds
      @sam-wv2ds 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      i will not ☺️

  • @petersmythe6484
    @petersmythe6484 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    (33:36 - 33:41) "It is going to take a miracle now. ...".
    It doesn't matter, but that was genuinely funny.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Even more of a miracle than I realized (for some reason I thought they only had three Phoenix in the graveyard and we were going to two, lol).

  • @barmstrong003
    @barmstrong003 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    You could use banefire as another win condition too. It become uncounterable

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Ohh, that does sound fun!

  • @itsallenwow
    @itsallenwow 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Holy crap Steamkin is such a good storm card

  • @galleadden
    @galleadden 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Could you have stormed off in match 2 at 14:30 if you had just activated the ignus over and over instead of casting the second ignus?

    • @Zaibech
      @Zaibech 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Grinning Ignus only makes 1 red mana, so eventually you'd run out of red mana.

    • @galleadden
      @galleadden 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Zaibech ooohhhhh I completely missed you need 2 red for bounce and cast. Thanks for the explanation!

  • @jeffarmstrong2048
    @jeffarmstrong2048 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sweet deck Seth. As a Legacy Ruby Storm player, I am so happy to be building this in historic. Too bad looting is a rare wild card. I think I'm going to try 'open the omenpaths' until I can get them

  • @streiifi
    @streiifi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    finally historic content with the new mystical archives
    your content in the next few weeks gonna be epic

  • @dwarvendad
    @dwarvendad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Oh thank god, I can finally play storm again

  • @cloysterd
    @cloysterd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    But certainly Path to Exile would be too good for Historic...

    • @gabrielmariz9610
      @gabrielmariz9610 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I would love to see that!!!

    • @James-fq3yz
      @James-fq3yz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You have no idea how badly I want path in historic

    • @WilfNelson1
      @WilfNelson1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      i suspect it wouldn't be broken but probably not a good idea. The reason is historic is a format of getting ahead of your opinion, giving them a land means you ramp them to their finisher and one creature probably isn't going to win any match by itself in historic. Swords is definitely too good because historic is not really a format about life total, you just need critical mass or your combo and you will win even against decks like angels with massive life totals.

    • @itsacopy
      @itsacopy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Or bolt

    • @James-fq3yz
      @James-fq3yz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@itsacopy I'd prefer bolt tbh

  • @andrew1875
    @andrew1875 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That geeky warm voice always cheers me up! Cool deck!

  • @bigwig8657
    @bigwig8657 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Interesting build, went for mizzixs mastery, light up and shocks instead the creatures and artifacts.
    Mizzixs makes getting 20 if ignus gets stomped way easier.

  • @250Z
    @250Z 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was trying to brew my own storm historic deck. I had valakut awakening instead of spikefield hazard since it's another card that digs through the deck and a couple of magma jets to deal with early creatures and scry. Good idea bringing the 1 mana red cantrips.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I originally has Valakut Awakening along with Spikefield Hazard, but ended up cutting Valakut Awakening because it's a rare to keep the price down (I still think it's a good option for the deck though).

  • @rfs8194
    @rfs8194 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was fun! !I'll get those Mystical Archive cards from drafting sooner or later, and then I'll give this deck a spin!

  • @jmm765psu
    @jmm765psu 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So close to accidentally targeting self with grapeshot at the good game phase at 30:00. Sweet deck

  • @JonnyEsports
    @JonnyEsports 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I made virtually the same deck except instead of the Ox I went with Arclight Phoenix. That way the opponent will have to use removal on the Phoenixes so hopefully, they run out of removal by the time I go to combo.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Arclight seems like a sweet backup plan. Phoenix Storm could be fun!

    • @JonnyEsports
      @JonnyEsports 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MTGGoldfish Yeah, I really like it! Even if they have a boat load of removal, they killed Phoenixes, and Birgi, and whatever else. Phoenixes just come back (assuming they didn't exile of course) so it's a really good backup win-con.

  • @matthewlohmeier2056
    @matthewlohmeier2056 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Seth is a secret aggro player even though he will never admit it. I never hear him laugh more than when he does aggro videos or plays red. He IS the grinning ingus! Not to be confused with the grinning ingus.

  • @optimusprimmv1
    @optimusprimmv1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Testing out trimmed and edited arena videos again? This was a pleasure to watch!

  • @Infernoman64
    @Infernoman64 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    NEVER underestimate storm regardless of the format! Even in Historic with limited options, Grapeshot STILL finds a way! I know what I'm building!

  • @HeWhoSlayethCain
    @HeWhoSlayethCain 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I feel like there should be a couple Banefire's somewhere in there, as another uncountable win-con.

    • @atlys258
      @atlys258 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I like the way you think sir 👍

    • @HeWhoSlayethCain
      @HeWhoSlayethCain 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@atlys258 I played a mono-black banefire deck in standard a few sets back using Cabal stronghold...Banefire for 27 ftw.

  • @Dareianrc36
    @Dareianrc36 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That grapeshot artwork reminds me of Dr Doom's finger laser super from the Marvel vs Capcom games

  • @Seldomheardabout
    @Seldomheardabout 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I'm convinced that Seth's mispronunciations are a long running troll. No one can be that bad at reading/pronouncing.
    Love you Seth.

    • @firstandlast.1254
      @firstandlast.1254 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Comments like these feed that ever-hungry algorithm. It costs him absolutely nothing in terms of resources, or honestly even effort. If a normal video would get 1000 comments, but because of a funny mispronunciation it now gets 1020 comments or whatever, that's just free value. I like it because it's creative and beneficial, while victimizing no one.

  • @cyn0_
    @cyn0_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was watching this video and went onto arena to try and see if I had the cards to make this deck, saw that I didnt and decided to do a ranked match. First deck I run into is this exact deck. This video had storm too apparently...

  • @Spike-kg5rd
    @Spike-kg5rd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I love the deck but with 16 Rares this is hardly budget on Arena. Considering it's Historic, it's probably the only place it would be played so there's no way it could be considered anything less. Still very fun to watch, love me some storm, just a little sad this is something I'll likely never be able to build

    • @mostlyholy6301
      @mostlyholy6301 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It is awkward when Seth plays "budget" decks on Arena that are actually super non-budget for Arena players.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      In general I try to shoot for 15 rares or less for "budget" on Arena, but in reality there aren't really many budget decks on Arena because the client is so expensive and it can be hard to get the cards you need.

    • @miguelfreitas5343
      @miguelfreitas5343 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you're interested in Bo1, LegenVD also made a storm list that is a bit more budget and works just as well, if not better. I've been playing it non stop and it's super fun, you should check it out :p

  • @Atmapalazzo
    @Atmapalazzo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seth, it's a phoenix deck, they're packed with removal spells

  • @ShadowWalker-ng1it
    @ShadowWalker-ng1it 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now I'm curious about the non budget version change to snow mountains and play the snow mutavault?

    • @jeffggtv
      @jeffggtv 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm running exactly that. The colorless is sometimes weird, but it is very good against control

  • @grantwilliams1597
    @grantwilliams1597 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's crazy to see Historic becoming a sort of Modern-ish

  • @archmage6725
    @archmage6725 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow they HAVE to make that faster. I’m sure it’s fun to play but it must be absolutely hell to sit through as the opponent.

  • @mrpinguimninja
    @mrpinguimninja 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wouldn't it be worth having a few pacts of negation on the sb, at least as a form of protection?

  • @nuuskye
    @nuuskye 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This deck is even more powerful than the video suggests. We love you Seth, but you definitely aren't a storm player 😅Overestimating the need for infinite mana vs infinite storm led to 2 or 3 losses.
    if you already have the two extra mana to cast grapeshot, ignus + monument + any card in hand is a win. Untap with ignus + any cost reduction + grapeshot is a win, etc.
    Looking forward to running this deck!

  • @Yig_al_Gaib4242
    @Yig_al_Gaib4242 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    36:15 I love that card!!!

  • @christianbraun8067
    @christianbraun8067 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wait in match 2 game 1 couldn't Seth have still stormed off with 1 ingus and monument? What am I missing?

    • @MstrKipper
      @MstrKipper 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ignus gives you back 2 and a red, but costs 1 and 2 red to cast and use the ability so he didn't have the red mana to combo

  • @atlys258
    @atlys258 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Mmmmm, grapes. 😋
    But seriously, I hope Arena gets some optimizations for spell copies and multi-targeting/multiples of single-targeting to allow you to select a value for X when targeting with multiple copies.

  • @cesar300ist
    @cesar300ist 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does anybody have the match 5 opponent's decklist?

  • @dooropenization
    @dooropenization 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think in match #2 you could’ve won game one. You had three counters on your Steam-kin and enough mana to play Ignus, plus a Grapeshot in hand. That setup alone is infinite spells into storm grapeshot. Let me know if I missed something.

  • @freeejazzz
    @freeejazzz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Include Hidetsugus Second Rite in the sideboard?

  • @jamiewerger9027
    @jamiewerger9027 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I actually play temur storm since I haven’t got a steam kin or enough faithless looting and it is honestly pretty good trying to break out of gold with it now

  • @musicmeanslife65
    @musicmeanslife65 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The red march from neon kamigawa can replace the cantrips I think. What ya think Mr. Seth?

  • @Nr4747
    @Nr4747 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shouldn't this deck be running Burning Tree to have more chances at extra (although I know it's not infinite) mana with Birgi and Steam-Kin ?

  • @jasonhernandez3806
    @jasonhernandez3806 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Had waaaaay too much fun with this. I feel bad for the opponent that has to wait for my triggers

  • @personsomeone2760
    @personsomeone2760 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I realized all I'm missing for a mono red deferent deck is thermo vent defender

  • @joekeny
    @joekeny 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are decks like this playable on mobile? I worry that the mobile version might be too slow and I'd time out or something.

  • @Rakunya
    @Rakunya 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I feel like there are a few games (match 2 game 1?) Where Seth missed that Grinning Ignus and Hazoret's Monument with one open mana is already infinite storm infinite dig through your deck, and will leave you mana to grapeshot.

    • @Kettwiesel25
      @Kettwiesel25 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think there are a few games where you didn't realize it is not infinite ;) Ignus gives 2 colorless and only 1 red, not enough to loop it.

    • @devoidMelody
      @devoidMelody 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nah, ignus doesn't produce enough red mana to loop

    • @case540
      @case540 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Kettwiesel25 Oh, thank you. I was confused too

  • @nickyoung7508
    @nickyoung7508 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks like somehow game 5 was just two old modern matches... Storm vs Death and Taxes.

  • @LaughingDepressed
    @LaughingDepressed 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Didnt he have the kill at 14:30???

  • @riellydesrosiers481
    @riellydesrosiers481 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So ive been playing this deck and it works amazingly it feels really long tho but then again that’s what storm is lol it works great!

  • @chaotemagick3
    @chaotemagick3 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The deck list directly in front of his face

  • @Ex4_
    @Ex4_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about the Strixhaven card that basically has "Magecraft - Create a treasure"
    Wouldn't that fit in there? It's also not a rare.

  • @imcohencohen
    @imcohencohen 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This deck is sweet and all, but I can’t help but feel you waited for the historic archive to drop to do historic budget Magics even though Time Spiral remastered just made some of the best cards in modern dirt cheap. Off the top of my head I can say that hollow end is probably only 60-70 dollars now, and I bet you could cook up many more sweet ideas.

  • @paulmckeever9193
    @paulmckeever9193 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How much does this deck cost? Maybe buy it in a couple weeks

  • @vikashv1
    @vikashv1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Remember how much of a joke Historic was when it launched, how the turn tables...

    • @Spaced92
      @Spaced92 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Because of the wildcard issue (which is still unforgivable tbh, twice the cost for old cards is crazy), everyone wanted Historic. Even now I feel bad for anyone trying to actually get into Historic, the cost must be ridiculous.
      Every new format besides Pioneer has at least some early skepticism, funny how it turned out for Pioneer though I blame the pandemic.

  • @ayechanmoe9754
    @ayechanmoe9754 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wait... Am I missing something? Match 2, game 1, you could've kept bouncing the first Ignus over and over again with the monument out right? And then Grapeshot for lethal?

    • @MstrKipper
      @MstrKipper 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought the same thing however Ignus gives you back 2 and a red, but costs 1 and 2 red to cast and use the ability so he didn't have the red mana to combo

    • @ayechanmoe9754
      @ayechanmoe9754 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MstrKipper Oh yeah, totally forgot that

  • @DimT670
    @DimT670 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wait don't you just win or at keast cycle through your whole deck with just hazotet monument and grinning ignus? Am i missing smth?

    • @mjmenzies
      @mjmenzies 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That was my thought. He had the two to cast another one, which meant he had enough for the grapeshot in hand...

    • @crooker23
      @crooker23 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ignus costs 1 redto play and costs another red to suck back up, while ignus only generates 1 red mana every time you play it. thats why you need either bergi or steamkin on the board to combo

  • @xxslambo10xx64
    @xxslambo10xx64 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    could you upgrade this?

  • @fateweaver9
    @fateweaver9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I still cant believe that Faithless Looting art was real.

  • @guessthatsitthen4982
    @guessthatsitthen4982 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    The decklist in front of the face 😂

    • @sushiske
      @sushiske 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Seth *is* mono-red storm...

  • @kallinblackburn717
    @kallinblackburn717 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I built a mono green mutate storm ish deck in historic if you want to see it.

  • @Vininn126
    @Vininn126 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The meme intro was subtle.

  • @__lemonade
    @__lemonade 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love that first match opponent gave a GG while slowly watching himself die with nothing to do about it. 😂

  • @jacobm954
    @jacobm954 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The only part of Storm I don't like is the lack of automation. Magic online can do it, right? Hopefully they find a solution so it is not lile the cat oven ban

  • @tgushue
    @tgushue 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So in terms of the transformational sideboard (after seeing a similar deck in another video) why not run Firebrand Archer over Thermo-Alchemist? Sure, it has less toughness, but you're bringing it in against control, so removal is a wash. Archer at least can ping while you're storming off and isn't subject to summoning sickness, and you also get incidental triggers on things like Harnfel and Monument.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the two are pretty similar. Thermo-Alchemist dodges somewhat more removal. Firebrand Archer has the upside of potentially being able to attack. The abilities are pretty much the same (outside of Theromo-Alchemist needing to not be summoning sick).

  • @trubica
    @trubica 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What's with the list on Seth's face?

  • @johndoe26625
    @johndoe26625 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    haha i also crafted my own mono red storm list for historic once grapeshot mystical archive was spoiled

  • @aem472
    @aem472 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ig - Nus (like ignite)

  • @CubicCoder
    @CubicCoder 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This deck. Like 40 bucks now to make and a lot of the cards are common as hell so now this deck is stupid easy and budget

  • @xTrooper377x
    @xTrooper377x 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    STORM LETS GOOOOOO. STORM COUNT GOES BBBRRRRRR!!!

    • @pietrociompi5883
      @pietrociompi5883 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      On arena it goes more like: B...r...r...r...r...r...r...r...r

  • @dr-rer-nat-jonathan
    @dr-rer-nat-jonathan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    they should definitely implement an option to turn off all animations!

  • @BratkoCo
    @BratkoCo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In the description did you mean 'now possible' lol

  • @notmynormalusername1
    @notmynormalusername1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm so confused about the mystical archives. Last night the deckbuilder said lightning bolt isn't legal? But these storm cards are?

    • @notmynormalusername1
      @notmynormalusername1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh, yikes wotc. Apparently they're all legal in historic except for specific ones:
      Channel
      Counterspell
      Dark Ritual
      Demonic Tutor
      Lightning Bolt
      Swords to Plowshares
      Really not intuitive. I wonder if we're going to continue to see the pattern of "this set is legal in this format.... except..."
      Kind of already feels like we're doing that with banned cards. A set is standard legal except for it's broken cards some time after the set has sold %90 of the boxes it will sell.

    • @WiZzArDStudios
      @WiZzArDStudios 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      These mystical archive legalities are confusing indeed, they're not legal in standard but SOME are legal in historic.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, they are all legal except for seven they banned.

  • @crovax1375
    @crovax1375 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who laughs more maniacally Seth or Grinning Ignus?

  • @jochenkirn9468
    @jochenkirn9468 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    No idea why D&T player scooped twice. Mom called them to dinner?

  • @TheHandsomestMale
    @TheHandsomestMale 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In Match 2 I bet that opponent will have just kept a hand full of duds and removal, seemed like the only way they were going to win was to make sure nothing stuck.

  • @andreaspersson3532
    @andreaspersson3532 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is Guttersnipe too expensive?

  • @RogerontheKeys
    @RogerontheKeys 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    made the deck and went 3/3 but at what cost......I truly missed storm though lol.

  • @tonybraumberger2175
    @tonybraumberger2175 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ignus be like:
    "Heheheheheheh"

  • @pokeslob
    @pokeslob 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I had someone try this deck against me a few hours ago and my single Authority of the Consuls shut it down lol They apparently got frustrated and grape-shotted themselves to end the match.

  • @ComedIanMTG
    @ComedIanMTG 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Couldn't you still have won on game 1 vs sultai? Monument made ignus mana neutral and you had grape shot

  • @stephenhousman6975
    @stephenhousman6975 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    For Match 4 it isn't that surprising. They tend to take out some number of pheonix for anger.

  • @overcoldice
    @overcoldice 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Grinning Ingus, poor fella.

    • @overcoldice
      @overcoldice 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      His name is Ignus, not Ingus.

  • @amandaspear6148
    @amandaspear6148 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice

  • @mattwilliams811
    @mattwilliams811 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    There's a part of me that dislikes the fact that you always kill them with the copies of Grapeshot, the actual Grapeshot never gets to resolve!

  • @snappycaster
    @snappycaster 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Historic is in a weird spot right now because its has cards like grapeshot and tendrils of agony without the weird super narrow color hate cards from the old core sets like dragons claw.

  • @tsingtsonggaming6301
    @tsingtsonggaming6301 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rather than grapeshot, why not use reservoir, it does defeat the point of the deck but since you gain infinite colorless mana from ingus it makes you win more consistently

    • @tsingtsonggaming6301
      @tsingtsonggaming6301 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      *but since you dont gain infinite red mana but gain infinite colorless instead

  • @justinreschke3642
    @justinreschke3642 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That faithless looting art...

  • @cloudmane4159
    @cloudmane4159 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Idk if this is budget. Seems like historic decks on average need 20-24 rare wc’s.

    • @Boconopo34
      @Boconopo34 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah Seth stretched the definition of budget with this one

    • @mostlyholy6301
      @mostlyholy6301 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He means in terms of the price of the paper version of the deck, which is an odd criterion since most magic players do not play paper magic.

    • @cloudmane4159
      @cloudmane4159 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mostly Holy no hes talking about historic which is an arena only format

    • @mostlyholy6301
      @mostlyholy6301 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cloudmane4159 Oh good point, idk how this deck is budget then.

  • @8Scientist
    @8Scientist 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you really want an against the odds, try making "fairl storm"!

  • @cstillz2562
    @cstillz2562 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I LOVE THIS SETH!!