Talking History |5| Delhi: The rise of Tughlaq Dynasty

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ก.ค. 2017
  • Talking History is a documentary series on Rajya Sabha TV charting the past of fabulous Indian cities and their history.
    In this episode, we travel to the times of Tughlaq rule in Delhi. The Tughlaq dynasty was founded by Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq, a military commander in the court of Khilji sultans. After establishing his rule he built new city naming it Tughlaqabad. The city was soon abandoned as his successor and son Muhammad Bin Tughlaq built another city Jahanpanah. He also spread the rule far upto the deccan region. Muhammad bin Tughlaq is also known for his infamous decisions like change of currency and shifting of capital.
    Guests: Sunil Kumar, Proffessor, History, Delhi University
    Bela Upadhay, Delhi Karavan
    Anchor/Producer: Rajat Kain

ความคิดเห็น • 60

  • @khushichandel4502
    @khushichandel4502 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thanks Rajya Sabha TV & all team members for making such brilliant video.

  • @ankitsharma4523
    @ankitsharma4523 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Professor Sunil Kumar died in 2021. Many moons ago, I had the good fortune of attending a couple of his guest lectures when he came to Stephen's on the request of one of our professors, to talk about the turkic origins of the Delhi Sultanate. In my limited academic experience, I have not heard a professor deliver lectures with such immaculate style. May his stories be told for a long time.

  • @tinatuna7620
    @tinatuna7620 5 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I can't believe you aren't monetizing these videos. This series is amazing.

    • @shubhamdubey7349
      @shubhamdubey7349 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Not so noble thought

    • @ambar9232
      @ambar9232 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      These are produced or sponsored by Government of India. Besides, RSTV CEO Gurdeep Sappal said in answer to a PIL "The idea behind RSTV was not to cater to the common minimum denominator. The Indian Express doesn't sell much, but everybody who matters reads it. Similarly the people who matter should watch RSTV. It was decided not to take ads, Parliament should not take money from anyone."

  • @neerajsinghal329
    @neerajsinghal329 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Background music throughout the video was magnificent..!!
    Thank You for this informative piece Rajya Sabha TV..!! 👍👌🙏

  • @pulkitsharma6648
    @pulkitsharma6648 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Books padhne ki zaroorat hi nahi, this is brillant

  • @abdullah786k
    @abdullah786k 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    brilliant series

  • @Mezungmeim
    @Mezungmeim 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Can't believe you are gone, sunil sir.

  • @ankitsingh-gl7hj
    @ankitsingh-gl7hj 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    music from 29:16 to 29:32 bahut zabardast hai...

  • @nihitsingh9141
    @nihitsingh9141 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    tell about battle of singauli in which he was taken captive and taken to chittor

  • @TaurusGaurav
    @TaurusGaurav 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Thanks Rajya Sabha TV & all team members for making such brilliant video.
    with warm Regards:
    Gaurav Rousha

  • @vinaygupta5234
    @vinaygupta5234 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Kindly do justice to IBN-Batuta, who wrote about the court details, when not a day passed when barbarism of Mohammed bin Tughlaq was not visible with human blood and flesh...

  • @Htondak
    @Htondak 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Superb video
    I like the way u present rstv
    Specialy edit or music
    Thanks Rajat
    Special thanks to your editor
    Lovley

  • @ankitajha5938
    @ankitajha5938 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I like history.

  • @rachitaurora
    @rachitaurora 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In 1333, Muhammad Bin Tughlaq led the Qarachil expedition to the Kullu-Kangra region of modern-day Himachal Pradesh in India. Historians like Badauni and Ferishta wrote that Tughluq originally wanted to cross the Himalayas and invade China. However, he faced local resistance in Himachal. Prithvi Chand II of the Hindu Katoch kingdom of Kangra defeated the army of Muhammad Bin Tughlaq which was not able to fight in the hills. Nearly all his 100,000 soldiers perished and were forced to retreat.
    < could've also mentioned this...

    • @venom19010
      @venom19010 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fake, Qarachil was Kumaon

    • @browser3152
      @browser3152 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Would've been great if he'd conquered China. We might have evaded Chinese imports in present times.

  • @AloofManish
    @AloofManish 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Wonderful documentary on Tughlaqs, with highly informative narration.
    Pointing out a small error “Ibn Batuta is described as Arab traveller at 11:55, whereas he was Moroccan”

    • @shubhamdubey7349
      @shubhamdubey7349 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      There are Arabs in Morocco also.

    • @AloofManish
      @AloofManish 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Shubham Dubey Ohk... Thanks for the correction

    • @ashokmeena2055
      @ashokmeena2055 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      morocco is also arab

    • @AloofManish
      @AloofManish 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ashok Meena Got it. Thanks 🙏

    • @ankitsharma4523
      @ankitsharma4523 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well to be fair to the original comment, ibn battuta, was most probably of Berber descent which is not the same as Arab. Even traditionally, morocco was part of the maghreb world more than the Arab world.

  • @nadeemjokhio969
    @nadeemjokhio969 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice video.

  • @yogendra5114
    @yogendra5114 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    plese provide all these types of video in hindi

  • @princeg.8834
    @princeg.8834 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
    2:35 Start
    7:06 Tughlaqabad
    12:20 Mohammad -Bin Tughlaq
    14:00 new capital
    17:24 Samosa
    19:55 Daultabad
    24:15 Demonetisation
    27:48 Failed entral Asia & Deccan Expansion

  • @ihsanbajwa3974
    @ihsanbajwa3974 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    محمد بن تغلق نے دارلحکومت دہلی سے دکن منتقل کیا ۔۔۔۔۔۔کیا یہ معلومات درست ہیں؟؟؟؟

  • @PawanKumar-jq2dw
    @PawanKumar-jq2dw 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice

  • @RajeshGupta-oi7xr
    @RajeshGupta-oi7xr 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Pl dubb it in Hindi... Please
    Also for related to all historical and current affairs video

  • @kiranprasad7902
    @kiranprasad7902 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How about south indian history..Cholas, Kakatiyas, Vijayanagara

  • @ayaanff0027
    @ayaanff0027 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    👍

  • @himanshubhatia717
    @himanshubhatia717 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    please provide video on ancient & modern history too,but in hindi please

  • @abhilashagrawal9879
    @abhilashagrawal9879 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    at 29:40, a couple is making out behind him. That's why no history enthusiast is willing to go visit those ruins.

  • @manilkumarau
    @manilkumarau 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir kripya hindi me bhi upload karen

  • @rohitshinde9005
    @rohitshinde9005 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    make all video in hindi languadge pls

  • @kkrcreationstatus6583
    @kkrcreationstatus6583 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please provide in hindi.

  • @vishalregister655
    @vishalregister655 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Make videos in hindi language so, most people can watch this...

  • @southpaw8168
    @southpaw8168 ปีที่แล้ว

    why govt is not preserving them ..they are in such poor condition..these buildings are living history

  • @mukeshkumaryadav2678
    @mukeshkumaryadav2678 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Invadors

  • @taka-taktak
    @taka-taktak 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    These tughlaq were central asians right?

    • @Alakhana
      @Alakhana ปีที่แล้ว

      No they were of Punjabi origin from Multan.
      Amir Khusrau in his Tughluq Nama makes no mention of Tughluq's arrival in India from a foreign land, which seems to imply he was born in India. His own court poet states that Tughluq described himself frankly as a man of no importance ("awara mard") in his early life and career.[17] Tughlaq Nama declares Tughlaq to have been a minor chief of humble origins.[18][19] Tughluq was a Multani by origins.

  • @praveenyadav2284
    @praveenyadav2284 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Convert video in Hindi plz...... Sir

  • @amrohastudypoint9404
    @amrohastudypoint9404 ปีที่แล้ว

    Talking history ko Hindi main lao ...plzzz

  • @upgradecourses1382
    @upgradecourses1382 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hindi

  • @sanjaygarg1581
    @sanjaygarg1581 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    b

  • @kapilrawat2645
    @kapilrawat2645 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hindi m bol l

  • @papazataklaattiranimam
    @papazataklaattiranimam 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Turkish

    • @Alakhana
      @Alakhana ปีที่แล้ว

      One of the only sources which claims they were Turks comes from Ibn Battuta who claims they came from the "Qarauna tribe of the Turks" based on the claim of a Sufi saint Rukn-e-Alam. However, this is not corroborated by other contemporary sources and the Qara'unas were Mongols or associated with Mongol armies, whom Tughlaq despised and it is highly unlikely that Tughlaq was a Qara'una.
      And also Amir Khusrau in his Tughluq Nama makes no mention of Tughluq's arrival in India from a foreign land, which seems to imply he was not of a central Asian origin. His own court poet states that Tughluq described himself frankly as a man of no importance ("awara mard") in his early life and career. Tughlaq Nama declares Tughlaq to have been a minor chief of humble origins. Tughluq was a Multani/Punjabi by origin.

    • @papazataklaattiranimam
      @papazataklaattiranimam ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Alakhana B. P. Saksena 1992, p. 461,567:Tughlaq was one of the Turkish slaves of Balban and that his mother was a woman of a local Jat family. But this statement lacks confirmation by contemporary authorities. (II):-Whether Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq was son of a Jat woman has not been proved or disproved"
      Firishta, who travelled to Tughluq's former patrimony of Deopalpur to inquire about his early life, claimed that no one knew anything about him, save for a story that his father was a Turkic slave belonging to Ulugh Khan Balban.37

    • @papazataklaattiranimam
      @papazataklaattiranimam ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Alakhana did you even change wikipedia😅 Such an expression did not exist before.

    • @Alakhana
      @Alakhana ปีที่แล้ว

      @@papazataklaattiranimam I’m pretty sure the record of a courtesan from that time period (Amir Khusrow) is more reliable than a historian which came centuries later. I’m sure your source comes from a reliable historian but it is recorded that Tughluq himself claimed to be of humble origins and didn’t have a foreign origin (which could suggest he wasn’t a Mamluke )And the official genealogy of the Tughluqs was supposedly Persian (it was most likely flattery).
      Irregardless claiming them as solely Turkic is illogical considering there is various claims (some official) of their origins.

  • @sadenb
    @sadenb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    One fascist ruler after another. Butchers after Butchers.

    • @sfx2917
      @sfx2917 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You’re forgetting one fascist ruler who is still here

  • @mubarkkhan1143
    @mubarkkhan1143 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Boring subject सामाजिक विज्ञान