I believe that although there are visuals for this post the poster is BBC WORLD SERVICE which is a radio channel. I watched the vid titled "is it too late to save the Greenland Ice Sheet" which is the visuals to this.
Because as it melts the few particles of dust at each new level accumulates more and more at the top. Yes this heats faster and creates a positive feedback loop. 😕
This is usually caused from the ash from forest fires. Ash travels far and wide and can land on ice which in turns heats up the ice because the sun does not deflect. In turn causes the ice to melt faster.
The BBC World service is a radio programme and all they have done is spliced in a few bits of video to make it more interesting. Many of the videos on you tube would be better if we didn't have to look at them.
This took place years ago, the 80’s I believe. The Isaac walten league had a local man present his chart’s for a local lake of ice in and ice out on the areas biggest lake. He got back to early 1900’s up to present then, it was completely obvious that things are definitely warming! His chart’s laid it out perfectly!
Why take camera's to record the helicopter landing on the ice and then turn them off after 5 seconds? *A picture paints a thousand words, moving pictures even more so.*
I have been living near the salt water for 40 years and I can't see a single inch of sea level rise along my foreshore . The tide levels look the same to me .
People are mostly water so the 4 billion or so people that have been born in 40 years have used up the water that would have risen the sea level. Does that make sense?
@@LulaJake Makes as much sense as saying all the ice is going to melt when 100 meters of snow fell since 1942 when planes had to land in Greenland, that's where they are now, under 100 meters of snow. Look up Glacier Girl.
Thanks for your reporting on this issue. The production quality is not worthy of BBC. The information is good. So, thanks for that. But this may as well have been produced as a written document.
@@radjalomas8854 Because it isn't a video. It's from the BBC world service, which is a radio broadcaster. This is taken from one of their radio programmes.
28 trips to the Artic, no doubt he's planted a lot of trees to offset his carbon footprint? My question is, how much weight is there in ice, and how much will the land rise once all the Greenland Ice has melted? Are there any concerns about trapped organisms being released and causing us potential harm? Thank you for uploading and sharing.
Some carbon emissions are worthwhile. Ice weight loss does have an effect on volcanic activity but it's not the biggest concern. There are concerns about trapped diseases (and some very old organisms have been reanimated) but the risk is mostly considered very low (they'd probably be very vulnerable to antibiotics if they even got going at all -those reanimations happened in lab conditions).
Oh, so you think sea level rise won't harm us? JFC! Wake up cuz. Every major city on a coastline will be permanently flooded within the next 50 years. 200+ nuclear power stations are on tidal waterways. Imagine Fukushima x 200 and without any way to clean it up or hold back the radioactive material. So probably Fukushima X god knows what. No life on the planet would get away from that. And that will happen just with the loss of Antarctica's Thwaites glacier. As far as disease is concerned probably the worst thing that can come out of the frozen ground is Anthrax. However, the Greenland ice shelf does not have any dead animals inside it. Except maybe at its grounded point. But if the melt gets down to there a disease will be the last thing on our minds as we try to evolve gills in water-world.
With the accelerated warming and melting I don't see it taking millennia to melt. What really worries me is that the glaciers will break lose and slide off into the ocean en mass. If that happens, not only will it immediately raise sea levels dramatically but it will create a tsunami like we have never seen in our lifetimes. I hope you are right and we do have hundreds/thousands of years. I just don't see it from the studies I have seen.
@@jasonbrambach6957 I don't believe it is irreversible yet, but it is approaching fast. I believe we do have the technology, the tools to reverse it still, but I believe we lack the will to try. If it happens in the most catastrophic way imaginable mankind could be knocked back to the stone age, but I think some will survive. We are a tenacious virus. The planet getting a little fever won't be enough to be rid of us.
Martyn Tranten’s comment, “we shouldn’t play God”, resonated. However, the bulk of the planets million and billionaires don’t share this view, obviously, and that’s why we are racing to extinction. 😢
@@thiemokellner1893 Bill only wants to SRM you so the AGW doesn’t get you. it’s entirely for your own good & he wants you to know that the rumours of him & his father being raging fans of eugenics are just vicious rumours. $CIENCE!™️ BELIEVE !
@@dr5290 those so called ‘elites’ would have you thinking that overpopulation is the issue, when it’s really just the equitable distribution of resources that needs sorting out.
@@lw1zfog 10% of the world's population is producing 50% of the world's greenhouse gas excess, and similar proportions of other pollutants. We have a means to halve humanity's impact on our ecosystem right there.
What media like the BBC should be explaining is what was the last ice age , when did it start , what caused it (even that is still being debated ) what was its extremes and how long it has been melting to get an idea of the whole process .
No. This is not just climate change. This is a man made global warming crisis. There hasn’t been a time where warming has happened this quickly. Nor has there been a time when co2 has risen this quickly. Ever.
You're confusing glacial periods (ice ages) and interglacial periods (like the climate of the dinosaurs) which last 10's to 100's of millions of years, with glacial maximums and glacial minimums that last 10's to 100's of thousands of years. The last glacial period began 55+mya and the earth is currently still in the middle of that glacial period. We are at the end of a glacial minimum that began 12+tya and should be slowly cooling as we head towards the next glacial maximum, instead of rapidly warming Search: Melankovich Cycles. Enjoy.
Thanks for the report. One problem I have never seen mentioned is that there is no need to melt the ice to rise the sea level, it suffices that glaciers calve into the ocean. It will do the job just fine. The melting can take than whenever it does. Am I mistaken? How "good" are the chances that a huge amount of ice gets calved into the sea, let's say 1/7th of the Greenland ice shield, in "on go" just because there is enough ice molten to make parts of the shield swim enough to glide enough for the slope it is on?
I did a model I put sand in bucket and water around it. Than I added ice that raised the water level. When the ice melt the water volume leval stayed the same. So to say the sea will rise is a lie.
@@Nathan-ry3yu Your model is incomplete. If adding the ice made raise the level of your water, it is a model for the ice swimming in the Arctic sea. You might add a mighty block of ice on top of your sand on a stone that does not touch the water. Mighty only to see the melting effect on the water level more easily. The adaptation reflects the glacier ice in high mountain, the ice on Greenland and on the Antarctic continent. Or if you want it simpler, place a cube of ice in a glas that gets smaller to its base, e.g. coca-cola, such that it does not touch the ground the cube has to be big enough. After the ice has molten, you can tell us whether the level of water in the glas has risen.
@@Nathan-ry3yu are you trying to make a joke or ... first, how old are you? Change your experiment. Place a brick in the bucket. Then fill the bucket below the top of the brick. Now put a block of ice on top of the brick. I think you will be able to figure it out without waiting for the ice to melt.
The calving only occurs when there is sufficient ice for the whole length of the glacier to have flowed to the sea. So the total ice captured in the glacier has not changed.
@@thiemokellner1893 Not enough land coverage in ice to make a significant impact on sea levels to back up that theory of yours. Antarctica isn't as large as scientists had thought. It's actually made up of hundreds of islands. With majority off the surrounding sea covered in ice. That makes up majority of its ice coverage. New data shows Antarctica if it melts only about 2% sea leval may rise but no evidence to state it will happen either based on new discoveries of sea water leaking between our tectonic plates in the sea and getting trapped in rocks deep within our interior planet. Theirs studies that earth interior has 3 times the water trapped in rocks in our planet interior that what sits on the surface.
These people get to swan around the world and tell us it's the end of the world. There is no climate emergency. The Earth was warmer in the recent and distant past. It also warmed faster in the past.
In case you really don’t believe you know more than the scientist who have been studying this for decades, here you go. m.th-cam.com/video/InhMCJro6hA/w-d-xo.html
@notdem notrep The whole of East and West Antarctica is cooling, and has been for 40 years. East Antarctica has cooled by an impressive 0.7°C per decade. Resulting in an overall substantial and statistically significant decline of 2.8°C since 1980. So much for "Global" warming. I am referring to a paper by Zhu et al (2021) that looked at the reanalysed ERA5 satellite dataset.
@@OldScientist not sure what you’re reading or how you are interpreting it. There are a lot of people named Zhu. I came up with nothing pertaining to Antarctica searching for reanalysed ERA5 satellite dataset. However, there is no shortage of data analysis, showing large temperature rises on average over the last hundred years at both polls. All you have to do if you’re looking is search for the union of concerned scientists. It seems like a person can always find a “scientist“ and a “paper“ proving that fire isn’t hot, water isn’t wet and that you can be half pregnant. You need to employ your critical thinking skills sometimes.
"Flow of hot rocks rising from the Earth's core beneath central Greenland is melting the ice from below and contributing to sea-level rise, study finds"
I must say, I am loving your graphic. I thought it was a chart showing water running over glaciers and melting the ice, but, I realize the glaciers in this animation are actually melting way way slower than the glaciers!
@@anthonydoyle7370 AAAHAHAHAHAHHA I think the world's climate scientists from many different countries with post doc degrees already know plenty about ice ages , dummy.
That historical work has been done. Polar ice Cores have been taken and the data recorded. The science is way ahead of you and has been available for decades FYI.
@@solarwind907 It won't take much time when fresh water will be more expensive than gold. Spain, e.g., is craving already for fresh water and it is not even summer yet.
Sea level is rising at about 3.6 mm per year so it really is nothing to be worried about but we should prepare for it and reduce our CO2 emissions. However it is the worlds biggest economies who continue to do little in this respect making all the efforts of the a small few nations like the UK futile while making life unnecessarily harder for those citizens.
The normally reported range is 1.5 to 1.7 mm per year. The 3.6 mm per year is what NASA reports. Already NASA is 2 inches off from what harbormasters are reporting on the ground.
We're about 2.6 million years into the Quaternary Ice Age, which might last 100 million years. We are in the 45th interglacial (a brief, slightly warmer) period. The cold will return. But even this warm spell today is not far from the coldest range Earth has ever been. Nevertheless, ignore the geological record, adopt an emotionally-potent oversimplification, and blame donaldtrumpdioxide. Thanks BBC.
The snow and ice on the Greenland Ice sheet has been melting forever that is why it is not reaching the sky. This show is scaremongering for the oceans to rise a meter water would have to be stored on all the land mass to the height of two meters, this is due to the land covering about half the area of the oceans. Imagine Australia would have to hold two meters of water over its entire area, this would need to be repeated on all the continents for the sea to rise a meter.
I know that the ice wall is decently a problem while it's melting especially when they don't know exactly where the water is going to especially when they are thinking the sea level will rise hugely
Greenland is a contributer to sea level rise. The floating Arctic ice cap is more critical. The ice cap keeps the Arctic Ocean cold. Once the ice cap is gone the ocean will warm releasing CH4 and CO2 from the methane hydrates and permafrost. Melting Greenland ice and Antarctic ice faster.
I did a model I put sand in bucket and water around it. Than I added ice that raised the water level. When the ice melt the water volume leval stayed the same. So to say the sea will rise is a lie.
@@Nathan-ry3yu Yes true, floating is as in the Arctic will not raise sea level. But once the ice is gone the Arctic Ocean will warm rapidly releasing lots of methane and carbon dioxide accelerating warming. Continental ice like Greenland (3 km thick sitting on rock) and Antarctica will raise sea level tens of metres.
@@Nathan-ry3yu What your saying is almost true but there is thermal expansion plus latent heat effect, also, no ice, no albedo and is some shallow parts of the arctic ocean the clathrate hydrate could melt releasing methane.
So let me get this straight? You as a reporter flew out to talk to scientists which you could have done via the internet and actually provided more footage than you did! Then jumped on a helicopter ride only to capture a few minutes of footage of ice melting, which you could have easily obtained from tons of stock footage! All while more than 80% of the world has never seen the inside of an aeroplane... Could this kind of reporting be any more ignorant of the problem?
Now be good and do as they say......not as they do. They are allowed indulgences because they are important evangelists for the faith (carbon is the seed of evil) while you are only a mere 'denier.' As soon as they find a way to "capture the carbon" they will be burning 'deniers' the stake for their heresy.
How much CO2 would we need to emit to produce and install those pillows? What do we do with those innumerable pillows once we do not need them anymore? Let them float the oceans to create the next disaster? We are not even capable of handling our day-to-day waste properly.
From NASA…”The question: Melt ice cubes in a glass of water, and the water level will not change. Can the same be said for ice floating in the ocean? The answer: There is a common misconception that sea level change comes only from ice attached to land, and not from floating sea ice. Although that is mostly true, it turns out that there is an effect, even if it is minor. An often-overlooked ingredient makes a significant difference: saltiness. Various studies show that because floating ice is made of fresh water, it actually increases sea level slightly when it melts into the salty sea - unlike what happens in your water glass. A floating object, like an iceberg or other sea ice, displaces its own weight in water. But fresh water is less dense than salt water. So, when floating ice melts and becomes liquid, it takes up more volume than the seawater it displaced when it was ice, raising sea level. This has about 3% the effect of grounded ice-melt and raises sea level.”
Extraordinary to think that just in the last 30 or 40 years we've committed our descendants to centuries of sea level rise, and for what? A small minority of the world's population have had a nice time burning up cheap energy, but for the most part, at least in the UK, little has changed in terms of better insulated houses, better quality of life, transport etc, if anything we've gone backwards in the past few years. Climate action is also about more comfortable insulated homes, better public transport, walkable cities, higher investment in infrastructure and more jobs. It's tragically upside down.
Flying from Chicago to Korea for a major part of the journey every time I looked out the window there was nothing but ice, literally hours of nothing but ice. Frankly it was a bit horrifying imagining being stuck in the middle of all that ice. I'm in my 60's and while I accept that we're witnessing the last of the most recent ice age and that it may be getting pushed along due to human activity, I very much doubt my great grandchildren will live to see the day when all that ice is melted.
I have no doubts all the ice will melt in less than 20 years. The heat waves are getting so bad up in Canada and Switzerland. The poles are heating extremely fast. The ice has been melting much faster than predictions from 20 years ago. Ya folks, 20 years, it will all melt, the oceans will be dying and it will be too late.
I am 74 and having my health problems but at the rate of Arctic ice loss I may see the Arctic Ocean ice free. We are talking about the Arctic Ocean not the land. Each year there is less ice to melt and more heat available to melt it, so each year a greater percentage of the Arctic Ocean ice is lost, an accelerating cycle.
@@dan2304 I’m meaning land. In 20 years it will all melt away. Google Clathrate Gun Hypothesis, I believe we will be in a massive wakeup call soon. No one is discussing the runaway methane gas. Get ready 👉
I am 71 and have spent a large portion of my life working in the north. To me, the catastrophe is so obvious that to not see it, you must have your head where the sun don’t shine.
Facts is a strong word. You should call them what they are, climate related prophecies. Made by snake oil prophets who only get money from the government if they report there is a crisis.
So, a fellow told me on the net that it takes 343 joules (BTUs) of heat to melt just one GRAM of ice. So, if Greenland is losing 250-280 GT (1 Km X 1Km X 7m)/yr., well, you do the math. My 'puter exploded and then melted into a steaming pile of bubbling plastic when I tried to do it! We burned 8,000,000,000 TONS of coal in 2021, and we mindlessly and so often needlessly burn 100,000,000 BARRELS of oil DAILY, driving 23 ZJ into the oceans every year. Remember, you do the math, my 'puter is toast. We are accelerating our drive to extinction much, much faster than any of the MSM (yes, even my dear BBC) has told us, otherwise we'd be eliminating ALL unnecessary travel by any fossil fuel burning conveyance, and using CONTRACEPTION to prevent the horror that awaits the next generation and after, if there is an "after".
Get two classes and a ruler. Fill one with ice water and the other with rock and water and ice on top of the rock. Measure the difference. The ice water doesn’t change. The rock and water rises in level.
Greenland should worry us but arctic Sea Ice looks likely to be the first unignorable ice event when it first runs out in the mid-2030s. (which will massively impact Greenland)
@@OminousheatI'm pro melting so see same stats you do but glumly. 2223 at +8.5C which tbf would have been a lot Well past the era Star Trek is set in before Greenland melts at 4C... +2 think ice free Y3K 🥳
@@DrSmooth2000 If Thwaites collapses that is a 7m rise defo before the end of the century. And highly likely at least 6 feet before mid-century. 2m is a massive game changer and will exacerbate the melting of all other ice stores. Greenland, as it shrinks, will increase it's rate of melting due to the physics. Smaller objects have more surface area to mass plus the lowering of the glacier's altitude will obviously bring it into warmer air. Add the increase in global temps heating the oceans and I can not see how we can avoid 14 to 20 meters SLR by the end of the century without beginning to scrub the atmosphere of CO2 now. That is a calamity for civilisation and the ELE we should avoid. I fear for large ocean-bound mammals. We may lose the likes of Whales forever. It's all looking pretty grim.
Sudden sea level change isn't spoken to seriously. Underground storage tanks need to be remediated all over the world. We'll do nothing instead. Sudden sea level rise could be in 5 years or less. Antarctica and Greenland have large areas below sea level with warm seas. Obviously, we're reaching an end to balance.
The estimate as to when all of the ice melts. Doesn't mean the ice caps are not melting. The subsidence of land is not as significant as the ocean level rising as the polar ice caps melt. .
Arctic Sea Ice melting only makes a very very small contribution to SLR (and only because of salinity difference). What will be very significant is when we run out of sea ice up there and the heat has to go somewhere else.
Love your work. Pardon please but does the plethora of internal combustion engine contribute to the melting factor ? Not just automobile but all of it. Lawn equipment,trains, construction equipment, aircraft,boats and shopping ? Can a person effectively make a difference beyond give up the personal ride ?
How about, Penguins? It's important to stop looking at this as Greenland Ice Sheet problem and start talking about the Big Kahuna downstairs, because Greenland is tiny by comparison. The two figures of sea level rise are getting conflated, much to the detriment of those advocating action over theories.
since greenlands snow mass balance is increasing , not decreasing , maybe all the melting you’re seeing is because there is more snow to melt . greenlands ice loss is all at the fringes not the interior
If the ice melt was at the fringes there would NOT be lakes on top, and rivers in the interior. Remember Ice cubes melt from the inside out. We can only account for what we see on top, and around the edges, we really don't know much about what is actually happening underneath, and that's a big problem.
@@jeffgold3091 The snow on top may be increasing, that's possible; but you can see from satellite pictures that there's bare rock where there was glacier 10 years ago. That's along the sides and at the bottom. So while it might, IF you are correct, be getting thicker in the middle, it's still disappearing from the edges.
Why are beachfront properties so prized by rich environmentalists, if they are going to be underwater in the near future. Watch what people DO not what they Say
We humans have already altered known natural weather patterns, but nature will fight back. The next generations will have to adapt to a different world, less predictable and more aggressive.
@@Jc-ms5vv While that is possible it would take a LOT more warming than we are currently producing. However, we would eventually get there if we keep going like we have been.
Anyone notice that most scientists say it will be 1000 years. Eco anxiety destroys young peoples lives. Still looking for that sea with a slope. Want to go water skiing.
Sure, Earth has killed off biodiversity many times on its own before. Certainly doesn't need humanity for that. Moreover, in 500 million years everything dies as the sun heats up anyway. But maybe Life should go to the stars... and maybe Gaia won't be doing that herself... So... Gaia might have a purpose for humanity, right? Also, you say Earth "will be fine" after collapse, but certainly you understand that "will be fine" first means a couple of hundred millions of years of a rather hostile planet towards most forms of life. I think your position is fatalist and is inclined to bargain the pain of future life merely out of laziness to confront your own. "Earth will be fine".... Lazy.... Dangerous.... Unbecoming...
The Earth survived a time when Co2 levels were massively higher which is what grew the great forests of the Planet . Mans impact is just a stain that will wash off easily .
@@jvalentine8376 haha we’re pumping c02 into the atmosphere ten times faster then the petm extinction event. Do some research on previous mass extinctions and compare it to the rate of this one
Perhaps BBC world service is not the BBC. And if they showed the video portion they would get a copyright strike. I cant see why else they would bother to put a audio recording on You tube.
Drinking water 🚰 to collect + make portable hydroelectric turbines . All before it goes to the sea now. 🌊 Melting happens every year ...In Canada 🇨🇦 as well
Due to the sci ne also of freezing in the freezer and icicles making, we could use techniques to rebuild the lost glacier of Iceland and use ln2 and advanced freezing techniques to refrozen mass amounts of our world water, take form the ocean,freezer and place in ice caps of the planet
These estimates are extremely conservative. The models are wrong and one example of that is when they talked about the ice being darker than it used to be. The albedo effect that is lost because of purple algae and/or soot from forest fires etc. Increases the ice melting affect significantly. Permafrost melting is causing carbon dioxide and methane to be emitted into the atmosphere. Normally, we worry about burning fossil fuels, which is still a huge problem but once we melt enough permafrost, we will have run away greenhouse gas emissions even if we were to stop burning fossil fuels altogether. We’ve got a real problem on our hands, it’s really urgent. If you live in the United States, understand that Donald Trump has promised the fossil fuel industries that He will eliminate all environmental laws and ban wind turbines on day one of his administration. Unfortunately I’m not making this up.
And no mention of the 100 meters of snow since 1942 when planes had to land in Greenland, that's where they are now. No mention that all predictions of an ice free Arctic have failed. This year a massive Russian icebreaker had to take the Suez canal to get to Kamchatka because the ice was too thick for it to break through in July near Siberia..
How long before all the ice melts? You are reminding me of the Tootsie Pop owl. Just pick it up and drink it. Had I known this is what you intended, I'd have found another date.
Actually, the melting of global ice IS reversible. If you study the geological history of the earth, you would see that the earth has undergone numerous cycles of global warming followed by global cooling and back to global warming again, with periods of approximately 100,000 years. Since this has been going on for millions of years (long before man came on the scene), I think it is safe to say that mankind has absolutely nothing to do with the present period of global warming. And, incidentally, thank God for a few degrees of global warming, since all of the major advancements of civilization have occurred during warm periods. Mankind has struggled to barely exist during ice ages, such as the previous one 20,000 years ago. At that time massive glaciers up to a mile deep (the Laurentide lce Field) covered Canada and many of the northern areas of present day US from Chicago to New York City. At some point in earth history, massive glacier movements gouged out the huge basins that formed the present day Great Lakes. Is anyone in favor of reversing the present warming period and accelerating the return to the next ice age (if that were even possible)? Incidentally, CO2 has nothing to do with these climate cycles. CO2 has been on an overall downward trend for the last several million years and was as low as 180 ppm during the last ice age. News Flash: If CO2 were to continue to drop below 150 ppm, most plant life on earth would perish, most animals would perish, and consequently most human life would perish. Indeed, atmospheric CO2 is an absolutely essential building block for all life on earth. Consequently, it is the hight of ignorance to vilify CO2 and lament the fact that it has risin to over 415 ppm in our atmosphere. I say, "Thank God for that." Plants love higher CO2 levels and do even better at 2 or 3 times present day levels. Who knows? Maybe God put man on earth so that we could figure out how to recover and use some of the underground fossil fuels, thereby releasing their CO2 back to the air where it can be used to further the evolution of life on earth.
Current Doubling Rates suggest a much faster rise in sea level during the 2100s...but that should be avoidable I guess. But if not, then all ice melted by 2200's is my guess.
At least, the melting of Greenland may be helping to maintain the somewhat fresher surface layer in the Arctic. (or maybe this fresh water is swept into the Atlantic and doesn't help at all). If the fresher surface layer was to disappear, the Arctic ocean could not freeze every winter and produce the brine which is part of the AMOC. With rising air over the Arctic happening more often, creating anti-clockwise air circulation, the floating ice and fresher water is diverted by coriolis away from the centre of the circulation and expelled from the Arctic. One wonders what would happen with a drought in northern lands around the arctic, with rivers no longer refreshing this layer. So many factors to consider adding and subtracting from each other
Did your cameras stop working? Why not have footage of the topic?
whats with the stupid designs? give us some film.
I believe that although there are visuals for this post the poster is BBC WORLD SERVICE which is a radio channel. I watched the vid titled "is it too late to save the Greenland Ice Sheet" which is the visuals to this.
Why (on Earth!) can't BBC afford to send a camera man? Or did they send one? Is there some legal reason for there being 90% of audio with no visuals?
BBC World is a RADIO broadcast worldwide.
Does it make the information any staggering?
Something to do with a wish not to produce more CO2 with extra luggage/persons not needed for the production. it's good of them to do that.
I notice that the ice looks dirty which absorbs more heat from sunlight and further increases the melt.
Because as it melts the few particles of dust at each new level accumulates more and more at the top. Yes this heats faster and creates a positive feedback loop. 😕
when i saw that ice, ..it looked "water laden" to me, ..
very wet, loaded with water, slush maybe depending on the temp.
This is usually caused from the ash from forest fires. Ash travels far and wide and can land on ice which in turns heats up the ice because the sun does not deflect. In turn causes the ice to melt faster.
Nothing is melting. End of sea ice predicted constantly for the past 50 years.
Then add in the methane deposits 😂😂 w re fkd
Why are we subjected to that odd looking art?
You must be living a life of plenty if this is your only sorrow.
@@thiemokellner1893 RIP to your bitter ass
🤣🤣🤣
Budget cuts
Brainwashing
Where is the picture???? Wtf?!
The BBC World service is a radio programme and all they have done is spliced in a few bits of video to make it more interesting. Many of the videos on you tube would be better if we didn't have to look at them.
Why is the video a wavy stream of orange and blue blanks - where is the actual video feed?
This took place years ago, the 80’s I believe. The Isaac walten league had a local man present his chart’s for a local lake of ice in and ice out on the areas biggest lake. He got back to early 1900’s up to present then, it was completely obvious that things are definitely warming! His chart’s laid it out perfectly!
Is this a video or a podcast ?
Yes
Why take camera's to record the helicopter landing on the ice and then turn them off after 5 seconds?
*A picture paints a thousand words, moving pictures even more so.*
I have been living near the salt water for 40 years and I can't see a single inch of sea level rise along my foreshore . The tide levels look the same to me .
Data supports that. Tide charts haven't accelerated for all cities. No change in the rate of sea level change over the last 100 years.
More scam propaganda, no sea level rise acceleration, and no g. warming in the last 5+ years. 🙄
May I ask which sea your near?
People are mostly water so the 4 billion or so people that have been born in 40 years have used up the water that would have risen the sea level. Does that make sense?
@@LulaJake Makes as much sense as saying all the ice is going to melt when 100 meters of snow fell since 1942 when planes had to land in Greenland, that's where they are now, under 100 meters of snow. Look up Glacier Girl.
If the answer was in the very near future, would it make for a typical cozy announcement on a mainstream media platform?
Thanks for your reporting on this issue. The production quality is not worthy of BBC. The information is good. So, thanks for that. But this may as well have been produced as a written document.
agree, what's the point of making a video if it's to mainly show a graphic?
@@radjalomas8854 Because it isn't a video. It's from the BBC world service, which is a radio broadcaster. This is taken from one of their radio programmes.
28 trips to the Artic, no doubt he's planted a lot of trees to offset his carbon footprint?
My question is, how much weight is there in ice, and how much will the land rise once all the Greenland Ice has melted?
Are there any concerns about trapped organisms being released and causing us potential harm?
Thank you for uploading and sharing.
Some carbon emissions are worthwhile.
Ice weight loss does have an effect on volcanic activity but it's not the biggest concern.
There are concerns about trapped diseases (and some very old organisms have been reanimated) but the risk is mostly considered very low (they'd probably be very vulnerable to antibiotics if they even got going at all -those reanimations happened in lab conditions).
Oh, so you think sea level rise won't harm us? JFC! Wake up cuz. Every major city on a coastline will be permanently flooded within the next 50 years. 200+ nuclear power stations are on tidal waterways. Imagine Fukushima x 200 and without any way to clean it up or hold back the radioactive material. So probably Fukushima X god knows what. No life on the planet would get away from that. And that will happen just with the loss of Antarctica's Thwaites glacier. As far as disease is concerned probably the worst thing that can come out of the frozen ground is Anthrax. However, the Greenland ice shelf does not have any dead animals inside it. Except maybe at its grounded point. But if the melt gets down to there a disease will be the last thing on our minds as we try to evolve gills in water-world.
Like what’s happening with the permafrost, you mean?
@@fabiengerard8142 Yes
In
With the accelerated warming and melting I don't see it taking millennia to melt. What really worries me is that the glaciers will break lose and slide off into the ocean en mass. If that happens, not only will it immediately raise sea levels dramatically but it will create a tsunami like we have never seen in our lifetimes. I hope you are right and we do have hundreds/thousands of years. I just don't see it from the studies I have seen.
I hope you don’t rely on the BBC for your views on global warming.
@@ianrowley5762 And what scientific evidence do you rely on?
The IPCC concluded we are already in “abrupt climate change”. In other words, irreversible extinction.
@@jasonbrambach6957 I don't believe it is irreversible yet, but it is approaching fast. I believe we do have the technology, the tools to reverse it still, but I believe we lack the will to try. If it happens in the most catastrophic way imaginable mankind could be knocked back to the stone age, but I think some will survive. We are a tenacious virus. The planet getting a little fever won't be enough to be rid of us.
Same
Really wish we could have got video of all the beautiful sounding glaciers you are describing lol.
Martyn Tranten’s comment, “we shouldn’t play God”, resonated. However, the bulk of the planets million and billionaires don’t share this view, obviously, and that’s why we are racing to extinction. 😢
I am horrified of all those ideas of geoengineering as if we do not already (unintentionally) and fail miserably.
@@thiemokellner1893 Bill only wants to SRM you so the AGW doesn’t get you. it’s entirely for your own good & he wants you to know that the rumours of him & his father being raging fans of eugenics are just vicious rumours. $CIENCE!™️ BELIEVE !
@@dr5290 those so called ‘elites’ would have you thinking that overpopulation is the issue, when it’s really just the equitable distribution of resources that needs sorting out.
@@lw1zfog 10% of the world's population is producing 50% of the world's greenhouse gas excess, and similar proportions of other pollutants. We have a means to halve humanity's impact on our ecosystem right there.
What media like the BBC should be explaining is what was the last ice age , when did it start , what caused it (even that is still being debated ) what was its extremes and how long it has been melting to get an idea of the whole process .
No. This is not just climate change. This is a man made global warming crisis. There hasn’t been a time where warming has happened this quickly. Nor has there been a time when co2 has risen this quickly. Ever.
We are currently recovering from a miniature ice age caused by volcanic eruption.
You're confusing glacial periods (ice ages) and interglacial periods (like the climate of the dinosaurs) which last 10's to 100's of millions of years, with glacial maximums and glacial minimums that last 10's to 100's of thousands of years.
The last glacial period began 55+mya and the earth is currently still in the middle of that glacial period.
We are at the end of a glacial minimum that began 12+tya and should be slowly cooling as we head towards the next glacial maximum, instead of rapidly warming
Search: Melankovich Cycles.
Enjoy.
Not liking the background constantly flowing past. Show the actual pictures of the trip! Thanks!
Thanks for the report.
One problem I have never seen mentioned is that there is no need to melt the ice to rise the sea level, it suffices that glaciers calve into the ocean. It will do the job just fine. The melting can take than whenever it does. Am I mistaken?
How "good" are the chances that a huge amount of ice gets calved into the sea, let's say 1/7th of the Greenland ice shield, in "on go" just because there is enough ice molten to make parts of the shield swim enough to glide enough for the slope it is on?
I did a model I put sand in bucket and water around it. Than I added ice that raised the water level. When the ice melt the water volume leval stayed the same. So to say the sea will rise is a lie.
@@Nathan-ry3yu Your model is incomplete. If adding the ice made raise the level of your water, it is a model for the ice swimming in the Arctic sea. You might add a mighty block of ice on top of your sand on a stone that does not touch the water. Mighty only to see the melting effect on the water level more easily. The adaptation reflects the glacier ice in high mountain, the ice on Greenland and on the Antarctic continent.
Or if you want it simpler, place a cube of ice in a glas that gets smaller to its base, e.g. coca-cola, such that it does not touch the ground the cube has to be big enough. After the ice has molten, you can tell us whether the level of water in the glas has risen.
@@Nathan-ry3yu are you trying to make a joke or ... first, how old are you? Change your experiment. Place a brick in the bucket. Then fill the bucket below the top of the brick. Now put a block of ice on top of the brick. I think you will be able to figure it out without waiting for the ice to melt.
The calving only occurs when there is sufficient ice for the whole length of the glacier to have flowed to the sea. So the total ice captured in the glacier has not changed.
@@thiemokellner1893 Not enough land coverage in ice to make a significant impact on sea levels to back up that theory of yours. Antarctica isn't as large as scientists had thought. It's actually made up of hundreds of islands. With majority off the surrounding sea covered in ice. That makes up majority of its ice coverage. New data shows Antarctica if it melts only about 2% sea leval may rise but no evidence to state it will happen either based on new discoveries of sea water leaking between our tectonic plates in the sea and getting trapped in rocks deep within our interior planet. Theirs studies that earth interior has 3 times the water trapped in rocks in our planet interior that what sits on the surface.
These people get to swan around the world and tell us it's the end of the world. There is no climate emergency. The Earth was warmer in the recent and distant past. It also warmed faster in the past.
yup their is not , they lying the world is getting colder , and the poor will perish in next ice age , the rich are already making measures to survive
In case you really don’t believe you know more than the scientist who have been studying this for decades, here you go.
m.th-cam.com/video/InhMCJro6hA/w-d-xo.html
@notdem notrep The whole of East and West Antarctica is cooling, and has been for 40 years. East Antarctica has cooled by an impressive 0.7°C per decade. Resulting in an overall substantial and statistically significant decline of 2.8°C since 1980. So much for "Global" warming. I am referring to a paper by Zhu et al (2021) that looked at the reanalysed ERA5 satellite dataset.
@@OldScientist not sure what you’re reading or how you are interpreting it. There are a lot of people named Zhu. I came up with nothing pertaining to Antarctica searching for reanalysed ERA5 satellite dataset.
However, there is no shortage of data analysis, showing large temperature rises on average over the last hundred years at both polls. All you have to do if you’re looking is search for the union of concerned scientists.
It seems like a person can always find a “scientist“ and a “paper“ proving that fire isn’t hot, water isn’t wet and that you can be half pregnant.
You need to employ your critical thinking skills sometimes.
We're done for.
And we deserve it.
@herkimersnerd8740...and go where, ultimately?
So correcto Belladona. A change of atmosphere is ELE.
And It Will happen kickly with the methane permafrost....
Clouds of methane(?) When(?)
Cause and effect. Don't be a defeatist.
"Flow of hot rocks rising from the Earth's core beneath central Greenland is melting the ice from below and contributing to sea-level rise, study finds"
Lots of drama to replace evidence, counter arguments, reasoned assessment. Typical BBC.
I must say, I am loving your graphic. I thought it was a chart showing water running over glaciers and melting the ice, but, I realize the glaciers in this animation are actually melting way way slower than the glaciers!
I thought the graphic ''got in the way''
I mean the commentary talks of ''wonderful views'' but you dont see them because of the graphic!
Glacial and sea ice is melting at the rate of 2,000,000,000 tons/day. And ice absorbs 80 times as much heat as water.
When Australia ends fossil consumption. Using alternative energy sources such as nuclear, solar and wind even thermal if we drill a hole deep-enough
You should do a study on ice ages and their cycles. That would be interesting.
It might open up their thinking a bit. But I doubt it.
probably more truth in that then climate change
@@anthonydoyle7370 AAAHAHAHAHAHHA I think the world's climate scientists from many different countries with post doc degrees already know plenty about ice ages , dummy.
Do you scientists like Jason don’t do that?
That historical work has been done. Polar ice Cores have been taken and the data recorded. The science is way ahead of you and has been available for decades FYI.
I'm just wondering why that fresh water isn't being used for something yet by someone
The water may be free but the shipping will kill you. Think about it.
They have a hydro electric generator for the south end of Greenland.
Notwithstanding the fact that we have no idea what microbiomes, or whatever, may being released and may carry what potential diseases...
@@solarwind907 It won't take much time when fresh water will be more expensive than gold. Spain, e.g., is craving already for fresh water and it is not even summer yet.
Sea level is rising at about 3.6 mm per year so it really is nothing to be worried about but we should prepare for it and reduce our CO2 emissions. However it is the worlds biggest economies who continue to do little in this respect making all the efforts of the a small few nations like the UK futile while making life unnecessarily harder for those citizens.
The normally reported range is 1.5 to 1.7 mm per year. The 3.6 mm per year is what NASA reports. Already NASA is 2 inches off from what harbormasters are reporting on the ground.
We're about 2.6 million years into the Quaternary Ice Age, which might last 100 million years. We are in the 45th interglacial (a brief, slightly warmer) period. The cold will return. But even this warm spell today is not far from the coldest range Earth has ever been. Nevertheless, ignore the geological record, adopt an emotionally-potent oversimplification, and blame donaldtrumpdioxide. Thanks BBC.
So far this year there’s been record ice gain ,and it’s only end off October
As a climate change activist i think a lot of the media is really sensationalizing so much of the climate issue
You are correct ...and you are also playing a part in it as an activist
The whole issue has been sensationalized and politicised
Troll.
Andy F has a hockey stick to sell you.
As a scientist, I can assure you they’re SEVERELY underestimating the problem.
The snow and ice on the Greenland Ice sheet has been melting forever that is why it is not reaching the sky. This show is scaremongering for the oceans to rise a meter water would have to be stored on all the land mass to the height of two meters, this is due to the land covering about half the area of the oceans. Imagine Australia would have to hold two meters of water over its entire area, this would need to be repeated on all the continents for the sea to rise a meter.
I know that the ice wall is decently a problem while it's melting especially when they don't know exactly where the water is going to especially when they are thinking the sea level will rise hugely
One way to help would be to stop travelling using a gas guzzling helicopter.
Greenland is a contributer to sea level rise. The floating Arctic ice cap is more critical. The ice cap keeps the Arctic Ocean cold. Once the ice cap is gone the ocean will warm releasing CH4 and CO2 from the methane hydrates and permafrost. Melting Greenland ice and Antarctic ice faster.
I did a model I put sand in bucket and water around it. Than I added ice that raised the water level. When the ice melt the water volume leval stayed the same. So to say the sea will rise is a lie.
@@Nathan-ry3yu Yes true, floating is as in the Arctic will not raise sea level. But once the ice is gone the Arctic Ocean will warm rapidly releasing lots of methane and carbon dioxide accelerating warming. Continental ice like Greenland (3 km thick sitting on rock) and Antarctica will raise sea level tens of metres.
@@Nathan-ry3yu What your saying is almost true but there is thermal expansion plus latent heat effect, also, no ice, no albedo and is some shallow parts of the arctic ocean the clathrate hydrate could melt releasing methane.
Loss of albedo from the Arctic ice sheet will be catastrophic
As of this week Canada's forest is on fire due to an unprecedented heat wave.Another feedback loop that pushes temperatures even higher/faster.
yes global warming is just ONE of the many environmental issues we face- always look at the big picture!
So let me get this straight?
You as a reporter flew out to talk to scientists which you could have done via the internet and actually provided more footage than you did!
Then jumped on a helicopter ride only to capture a few minutes of footage of ice melting, which you could have easily obtained from tons of stock footage!
All while more than 80% of the world has never seen the inside of an aeroplane...
Could this kind of reporting be any more ignorant of the problem?
Now be good and do as they say......not as they do. They are allowed indulgences because they are important evangelists for the faith (carbon is the seed of evil) while you are only a mere 'denier.' As soon as they find a way to "capture the carbon" they will be burning 'deniers' the stake for their heresy.
Could they make White inflatable pillows to anchor over the algae blooms to kill them off and keep the ice from melting so fast?
How much CO2 would we need to emit to produce and install those pillows? What do we do with those innumerable pillows once we do not need them anymore? Let them float the oceans to create the next disaster? We are not even capable of handling our day-to-day waste properly.
Ice melting is a good thing......these people are lying to you.
From NASA…”The question: Melt ice cubes in a glass of water, and the water level will not change. Can the same be said for ice floating in the ocean?
The answer: There is a common misconception that sea level change comes only from ice attached to land, and not from floating sea ice. Although that is mostly true, it turns out that there is an effect, even if it is minor.
An often-overlooked ingredient makes a significant difference: saltiness. Various studies show that because floating ice is made of fresh water, it actually increases sea level slightly when it melts into the salty sea - unlike what happens in your water glass.
A floating object, like an iceberg or other sea ice, displaces its own weight in water. But fresh water is less dense than salt water. So, when floating ice melts and becomes liquid, it takes up more volume than the seawater it displaced when it was ice, raising sea level. This has about 3% the effect of grounded ice-melt and raises sea level.”
This is great and informative program, but what has happened with video?
Wish there was video with this, especially with the purple algea...
Extraordinary to think that just in the last 30 or 40 years we've committed our descendants to centuries of sea level rise, and for what? A small minority of the world's population have had a nice time burning up cheap energy, but for the most part, at least in the UK, little has changed in terms of better insulated houses, better quality of life, transport etc, if anything we've gone backwards in the past few years. Climate action is also about more comfortable insulated homes, better public transport, walkable cities, higher investment in infrastructure and more jobs. It's tragically upside down.
Extraordinary sea level is up 400ft since the end of the Ice Age over the past 18,000 years and you are whining about another inch.
There has been far higher levels of co2 in earth's history. Mankind's contribution is tiny by comparison.
@@adrianrouse5148 In earth’s history. Not in mankind’s.
Sea level has been rising for more than 12,000 years; when the sea level was 400 feet lower. Do some additional research.
Flying from Chicago to Korea for a major part of the journey every time I looked out the window there was nothing but ice, literally hours of nothing but ice. Frankly it was a bit horrifying imagining being stuck in the middle of all that ice. I'm in my 60's and while I accept that we're witnessing the last of the most recent ice age and that it may be getting pushed along due to human activity, I very much doubt my great grandchildren will live to see the day when all that ice is melted.
we need you to fly back to Chicago to tell us what you see now
I have no doubts all the ice will melt in less than 20 years. The heat waves are getting so bad up in Canada and Switzerland. The poles are heating extremely fast.
The ice has been melting much faster than predictions from 20 years ago.
Ya folks, 20 years, it will all melt, the oceans will be dying and it will be too late.
I am 74 and having my health problems but at the rate of Arctic ice loss I may see the Arctic Ocean ice free. We are talking about the Arctic Ocean not the land. Each year there is less ice to melt and more heat available to melt it, so each year a greater percentage of the Arctic Ocean ice is lost, an accelerating cycle.
@@dan2304 I’m meaning land. In 20 years it will all melt away.
Google Clathrate Gun Hypothesis, I believe we will be in a massive wakeup call soon. No one is discussing the runaway methane gas. Get ready 👉
I am 71 and have spent a large portion of my life working in the north. To me, the catastrophe is so obvious that to not see it, you must have your head where the sun don’t shine.
For anyone that cares, the union of concerned scientists is a good source for climate science related facts.
Facts is a strong word. You should call them what they are, climate related prophecies. Made by snake oil prophets who only get money from the government if they report there is a crisis.
So, a fellow told me on the net that it takes 343 joules (BTUs) of heat to melt just one GRAM of ice. So, if Greenland is losing 250-280 GT (1 Km X 1Km X 7m)/yr., well, you do the math. My 'puter exploded and then melted into a steaming pile of bubbling plastic when I tried to do it! We burned 8,000,000,000 TONS of coal in 2021, and we mindlessly and so often needlessly burn 100,000,000 BARRELS of oil DAILY, driving 23 ZJ into the oceans every year. Remember, you do the math, my 'puter is toast. We are accelerating our drive to extinction much, much faster than any of the MSM (yes, even my dear BBC) has told us, otherwise we'd be eliminating ALL unnecessary travel by any fossil fuel burning conveyance, and using CONTRACEPTION to prevent the horror that awaits the next generation and after, if there is an "after".
Bah, humbug..
CORRECTION: 144 BTUs to melt one pound of ice.
Do not worry! The weather gonna get you in a Wet bulb contest, long before this crap get a fret! /Mikael
Apparently it was by the year 2000, and every 2 years since
transphobe
@@lw1zfogclimate cultist lol
So long as it's floating ice it doesn't matter at all to first country nations. Greenland, however is very important to Northern Nations.
Get two classes and a ruler. Fill one with ice water and the other with rock and water and ice on top of the rock. Measure the difference. The ice water doesn’t change. The rock and water rises in level.
Why is the video part of this blocked??????
It's propoganda.....who cares
Interesting, deep,and perplexing.
Greenland should worry us but arctic Sea Ice looks likely to be the first unignorable ice event when it first runs out in the mid-2030s. (which will massively impact Greenland)
Antartica's Thwaites Glacier will probably be the first big SLR event. It's known as the doomsday glacier.
@@OminousheatI'm pro melting so see same stats you do but glumly.
2223 at +8.5C which tbf would have been a lot
Well past the era Star Trek is set in before Greenland melts at 4C... +2 think ice free Y3K 🥳
@@DrSmooth2000 If Thwaites collapses that is a 7m rise defo before the end of the century. And highly likely at least 6 feet before mid-century. 2m is a massive game changer and will exacerbate the melting of all other ice stores. Greenland, as it shrinks, will increase it's rate of melting due to the physics. Smaller objects have more surface area to mass plus the lowering of the glacier's altitude will obviously bring it into warmer air. Add the increase in global temps heating the oceans and I can not see how we can avoid 14 to 20 meters SLR by the end of the century without beginning to scrub the atmosphere of CO2 now. That is a calamity for civilisation and the ELE we should avoid. I fear for large ocean-bound mammals. We may lose the likes of Whales forever. It's all looking pretty grim.
In Antartica and southern Chile and Argentina tours are Still being advertised, what can we do to stop them?
Sudden sea level change isn't spoken to seriously. Underground storage tanks need to be remediated all over the world. We'll do nothing instead. Sudden sea level rise could be in 5 years or less. Antarctica and Greenland have large areas below sea level with warm seas. Obviously, we're reaching an end to balance.
I like how the people reporting on the melting ice flying a helicopter adding to the melting.
The estimate as to when all of the ice melts. Doesn't mean the ice caps are not melting. The subsidence of land is not as significant as the ocean level rising as the polar ice caps melt. .
Arctic Sea Ice melting only makes a very very small contribution to SLR (and only because of salinity difference). What will be very significant is when we run out of sea ice up there and the heat has to go somewhere else.
Love your work. Pardon please but does the plethora of internal combustion engine contribute to the melting factor ?
Not just automobile but all of it. Lawn equipment,trains, construction equipment, aircraft,boats and shopping ?
Can a person effectively make a difference beyond give up the personal ride ?
Also what about the South Atlanic Gyre of freshwater melt. Not mentioned and impact on AMOC.
Ice melted during the Medieval Warm Period, then advanced during the Little Ice Age. People did not have gasoline cars back then.
How about, Penguins?
It's important to stop looking at this as Greenland Ice Sheet problem and start talking about the Big Kahuna downstairs, because Greenland is tiny by comparison. The two figures of sea level rise are getting conflated, much to the detriment of those advocating action over theories.
would be nice to see what's going on. a lot of audible not a lots of video
I would criticize the absence of visuals that are bring directly and specifically referenced in the podcast. Show the chart where it references it.
since greenlands snow mass balance is increasing , not decreasing , maybe all the melting you’re seeing is because there is more snow to melt . greenlands ice loss is all at the fringes not the interior
If the ice melt was at the fringes there would NOT be lakes on top, and rivers in the interior. Remember Ice cubes melt from the inside out. We can only account for what we see on top, and around the edges, we really don't know much about what is actually happening underneath, and that's a big problem.
@@jimthain8777 there is snow melt every summer in greenland . but check the science - the snow mass balance is increasing .
@@jeffgold3091
The snow on top may be increasing, that's possible; but you can see from satellite pictures that there's bare rock where there was glacier 10 years ago. That's along the sides and at the bottom. So while it might, IF you are correct, be getting thicker in the middle, it's still disappearing from the edges.
@@jeffgold3091 Please point me to your scientific sources.
Thank you for corecting the scientist. You clever little monkey.
Why are beachfront properties so prized by rich environmentalists, if they are going to be underwater in the near future.
Watch what people DO not what they Say
Maybe because they know we’ll starve to death before their property is under water
We humans have already altered known natural weather patterns, but nature will fight back. The next generations will have to adapt to a different world, less predictable and more aggressive.
No adapting to a dead planet
@@Jc-ms5vv the planet won't die.
@@ia8018 not till the sun explodes but it will become uninhabitable and possibly turn into another Venus
@@Jc-ms5vv
While that is possible it would take a LOT more warming than we are currently producing.
However, we would eventually get there if we keep going like we have been.
@@jimthain8777 to become uninhabitable or turn into Venus? It’s already becoming uninhabitable and we wont be here to see if it turns into Venus
14,000 years ago the ic sheet was 2 miles deep covering north american
Let melt ,.
Why without video?
Right Now it's 0-20 degrees F everyday in the arctic circle.
Could you show a Map of greenland without the ice???
Thx . Greetings from Brussels 🙂🇪🇺
Anyone notice that most scientists say it will be 1000 years. Eco anxiety destroys young peoples lives. Still looking for that sea with a slope. Want to go water skiing.
Well considering it's night for about 6 months in the artic circle... The answer is never., But keep trolling us.
Can we just have the graphic without the talking next time?
real
Earth will be fine. Humanity’s time might be drawing to a close but Gaia will adapt.
Sure, Earth has killed off biodiversity many times on its own before. Certainly doesn't need humanity for that. Moreover, in 500 million years everything dies as the sun heats up anyway. But maybe Life should go to the stars... and maybe Gaia won't be doing that herself... So... Gaia might have a purpose for humanity, right? Also, you say Earth "will be fine" after collapse, but certainly you understand that "will be fine" first means a couple of hundred millions of years of a rather hostile planet towards most forms of life. I think your position is fatalist and is inclined to bargain the pain of future life merely out of laziness to confront your own. "Earth will be fine".... Lazy.... Dangerous.... Unbecoming...
Are you considering things like PFAS, radio active waste to name a couple???
Im looking forward for the end of humanity. Humans are the worst. I hope Earth get rid of this evil called humanity.
The Earth survived a time when Co2 levels were massively higher which is what grew the great forests of the Planet . Mans impact is just a stain that will wash off easily .
@@jvalentine8376 haha we’re pumping c02 into the atmosphere ten times faster then the petm extinction event. Do some research on previous mass extinctions and compare it to the rate of this one
Perhaps BBC world service is not the BBC. And if they showed the video portion they would get a copyright strike. I cant see why else they would bother to put a audio recording on You tube.
Drinking water 🚰 to collect + make portable hydroelectric turbines . All before it goes to the sea now. 🌊 Melting happens every year ...In Canada 🇨🇦 as well
Beautiful looking doc, unfortunately poor audio with lots of background chatter and noise!
This is live sound caption not studio soundproof caption. get real
Due to the sci ne also of freezing in the freezer and icicles making, we could use techniques to rebuild the lost glacier of Iceland and use ln2 and advanced freezing techniques to refrozen mass amounts of our world water, take form the ocean,freezer and place in ice caps of the planet
Poor editing. You rely on that wavey graphic too much. I have lost interest in your little Story time blurb, about what, again?
If BBC says so then it must be true, they never lie. 🤣
Exactly. It's not like they're globalist-controlled propaganda or anything.
These estimates are extremely conservative. The models are wrong and one example of that is when they talked about the ice being darker than it used to be. The albedo effect that is lost because of purple algae and/or soot from forest fires etc. Increases the ice melting affect significantly.
Permafrost melting is causing carbon dioxide and methane to be emitted into the atmosphere. Normally, we worry about burning fossil fuels, which is still a huge problem but once we melt enough permafrost, we will have run away greenhouse gas emissions even if we were to stop burning fossil fuels altogether. We’ve got a real problem on our hands, it’s really urgent.
If you live in the United States, understand that Donald Trump has promised the fossil fuel industries that He will eliminate all environmental laws and ban wind turbines on day one of his administration. Unfortunately I’m not making this up.
And no mention of the 100 meters of snow since 1942 when planes had to land in Greenland, that's where they are now. No mention that all predictions of an ice free Arctic have failed. This year a massive Russian icebreaker had to take the Suez canal to get to Kamchatka because the ice was too thick for it to break through in July near Siberia..
Where I live the climate is more cool than it is warm I don’t know if I want it to be any colder that’s for sure!!
In Arkansas we have had 105-106 degree temperatures every single day for almost 3 weeks in a row. It is brutal.
@@superbwater78 this heat wave soon pass.
How long before all the ice melts? You are reminding me of the Tootsie Pop owl.
Just pick it up and drink it. Had I known this is what you intended, I'd have found another date.
i saw the ice in this video like a rainbow, the color is yellow and green, this is audio
When will it melt ??? Don't know nobody kept records the last time it happened. Nobody knows the speed or ins and outs of the warming cycle.
BBC needs to look at what's going on in this upload. Most of it is a voice with a flowing blue and yellow graphic design. Take it down. Fix it.
Good work. A bit frustrating not being able to see what’s going on, phone footage would be fine.
She says "thousands of years', he says "hundreds of years", and DW Copernicus says 2,100: 77 yrs. ! GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER!
Correction: DW says 2/3rds gone by 2,100.
Nice topic, but please show more of the interviews and other video. The graphic is ok, but very annoying.
If they had video evidence, they'd show it. But they don't, so they can't.
Sadly the melting of global ice is Irreversible
Actually, the melting of global ice IS reversible. If you study the geological history of the earth, you would see that the earth has undergone numerous cycles of global warming followed by global cooling and back to global warming again, with periods of approximately 100,000 years. Since this has been going on for millions of years (long before man came on the scene), I think it is safe to say that mankind has absolutely nothing to do with the present period of global warming.
And, incidentally, thank God for a few degrees of global warming, since all of the major advancements of civilization have occurred during warm periods. Mankind has struggled to barely exist during ice ages, such as the previous one 20,000 years ago. At that time massive glaciers up to a mile deep (the Laurentide lce Field) covered Canada and many of the northern areas of present day US from Chicago to New York City. At some point in earth history, massive glacier movements gouged out the huge basins that formed the present day Great Lakes. Is anyone in favor of reversing the present warming period and accelerating the return to the next ice age (if that were even possible)?
Incidentally, CO2 has nothing to do with these climate cycles. CO2 has been on an overall downward trend for the last several million years and was as low as 180 ppm during the last ice age. News Flash: If CO2 were to continue to drop below 150 ppm, most plant life on earth would perish, most animals would perish, and consequently most human life would perish. Indeed, atmospheric CO2 is an absolutely essential building block for all life on earth. Consequently, it is the hight of ignorance to vilify CO2 and lament the fact that it has risin to over 415 ppm in our atmosphere. I say, "Thank God for that." Plants love higher CO2 levels and do even better at 2 or 3 times present day levels.
Who knows? Maybe God put man on earth so that we could figure out how to recover and use some of the underground fossil fuels, thereby releasing their CO2 back to the air where it can be used to further the evolution of life on earth.
nope is gaining ice
All lies, there is more ice then ever before.
@@xinixxagnix201 so true
m.th-cam.com/video/InhMCJro6hA/w-d-xo.html
Thank you very much, CrowdScience.
You can find more episodes of CrowdScience here: th-cam.com/play/PLz_B0PFGIn4cT4qluPKNtMmBAPPrpoxvT.html
Current Doubling Rates suggest a much faster rise in sea level during the 2100s...but that should be avoidable I guess. But if not, then all ice melted by 2200's is my guess.
Look at the dark dust on the ice.
Thats the reason why ice melts much faster when the sun shines on it.
Why upgrading Infrastructure and related technologies, matters. Besides, we need the practice for developing underwater Cities.
How long before all the world is covered in ice .....
Here’s another chance to educate yourself.m.th-cam.com/video/InhMCJro6hA/w-d-xo.html
Good luck with the miniatures!
How long till u can't step foot there or in Alaska or Canada .there saying permafrost is as thick as 100 meters in places it's all going to liquify
It is minus 80 degrees in places on this planet and that will never melt.
Ice has been melting for about 18,000 years.
? does BBC just fired their video editor?
Will Greenland pop up when the pressure of the ice is relieved
Yes it will. The UK is, in some parts, still rising from the last Ice Age.
At least, the melting of Greenland may be helping to maintain the somewhat fresher surface layer in the Arctic. (or maybe this fresh water is swept into the Atlantic and doesn't help at all). If the fresher surface layer was to disappear, the Arctic ocean could not freeze every winter and produce the brine which is part of the AMOC. With rising air over the Arctic happening more often, creating anti-clockwise air circulation, the floating ice and fresher water is diverted by coriolis away from the centre of the circulation and expelled from the Arctic. One wonders what would happen with a drought in northern lands around the arctic, with rivers no longer refreshing this layer. So many factors to consider adding and subtracting from each other