Evolution from ape to man. From Proconsul to Homo heidelbergensis
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ต.ค. 2024
- For Millions of years, our planet has been floating in space. Millions of creatures have lived on its surface. Many a quaint being was among them, but they affected only our, human imagination, for in the evolutionary struggle we are the only ones who have obtained the advantage of reason.
Evolution from ape to man
The animated movie made by Sergey Krivoplyasov and Antropogenez.ru in 2017
Why don’t apes evolve into humans? • Why don’t apes evolve ...
Subscribe to our channel: clck.ru/Jnmvo
Become a Patron: www.patreon.co...
Сharacters (human ancestors):
Proconsul heseloni
Ardipithecus ramidus
Australopithecus afarensis
Homo habilis
Homo ergaster
Homo heidelbergensis
The following people took part in the creation of the cartoon:
Alexander Sokolov - science consultant, project management;
Stanislav Drobyshevskiy - science consultant, screenplay, Russian voiceover.
Sergey Krivoplyasov - animation, characters set up, shaders, lighting, characters design, modeling, surrounding modeling, composing, edition, special effects. Optimization and rendering. Screenplay assistance, directing, producing and management. Everything was created and rendered with one computer :)
3D models by:
Oleg Avramenko;
Oleg Prosvirnin;
Dmitriy Shilov;
Vladimir Saenkov;
Alexey Troshin.
Episode 3 and 4 motion capture by Vadim Garelin (Vataga Studio)
Russian voiceover: MARAKUJA Records;
English translation by Ilya Mukhanov;
English voiceover by Josh Bloomberg;
English voiceover support: Clarus Victoria
English voice processing: Ivan Pereligin
Spanish subtitles: Luca ML
Bulgarian subtitles: Viktoria Tsaryova
German subtitles: Yurii Erofeev
Serbian subtitles: Elizabeta Musić
Norwegian subtitles: Vladislav Panteleev
Ukranian subtitles: Vladislav Panteleev
Information Support: Sci-One Channel / @scione
Technological Support: XXII century web portal 22century.ru/
Skulls were provided by the State Biological Museum named after K.A. Timiryazev.
Crownfunding and information support - Dmitriy Puchkov and Studio "Polniy P" oper.ru
(c) ANTROPOGENEZ.RU
antropo...
/ antropogenez
Contact
E-mail: g_souris@mail.ru
Skype: ya-kudzo
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 82 วันนี้!! คู่เอก | ยอดไอคิว vs อับดัลลาห์](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hSsyTl_9bqs/mqdefault.jpg)
![3. Dawn of the Stone Age - OUT OF THE CRADLE [人類誕生CG] / NHK Documentary](/img/n.gif)
The animated movie made by Sergey Krivoplyasov and Antropogenez.ru
Why don’t apes evolve into humans? th-cam.com/video/cfqIpr_xWlE/w-d-xo.html
Subscribe to our channel: clck.ru/Jnmvo
Become a patron: www.patreon.com/join/antropogenez_world
I love hominis
Very helpful !!! Thank you..
Cool
In the begining of common era charles darvin formulated the natural selection theory but when he was about to die one man issac met him and said him the real mystery about the holy book bible and he said about jesus and his miracles and when darwin heard this he changed and followed the path of god and died and he cancelled his theory about the monkey to man and believed that god made man and a woman adam and eve and through there generation u and me had been created thank u for your interests
May the god bless you and keep you &MAKE HIS FACE SHINE ON YOU AMEN
6:34 me running from my responsibilities
Phly your hear bro im a big fan
didn’t expect you here holy fuk.
Phlopy wopy
Ha I don’t even know you and still subscribed
Hahhahhhhh
human long ago: survival mode
human now: creative mode
Hardcore mode*
@@christbenitez8797 lol
This can be said only about small percentage, especially after the agricultural/pastoral revolution leading to ever increasing social stratification.
No, modern humans still have the instinct of the homo ergaster, it is called "fight ot flight response" modern words for it is Anxiety neourosis
@@Synthematix Agreed, it has been said that humans and chimpanzees have more pronounced proactive aggression which gets resolved with fight or flight response, while bonobos have more pronounced reactive aggression which gets resolved by sociosexuality.
Since humans are said to be generalist species then it probably depends on a specific environment and social attutudes (pan troglodytes like proactive political games over status and offspring compared to pan paniscus society based on reactive socially functional same sex bonding and playful group bonding for reconciliation regardless of age). Or human society after the agricultural/pastoral revolution based on competitive possessiveness over private property (marriage, amatonormativity), inheritance, virginity and maximization of birth rates according to antinatalism based on consent. Not sure about Melanesians, Trobrianders, !Kung, Bafia people, Mosuo and all the extinct undocumented egalitarian hunter-gatherer societies with partible paternity and alloparenting.
Thanks to cameraman live from million years ago for the documentary
He didn’t go back it’s animated lmao
Edit: you guys didnt get my joke ig. My joke was that I didn’t get the joke which is obvious .
AdvancedL2 nice job not getting the joke
Glizzyjulian On iOS
Yh because I definitely thought the guy was being serious when he thanked a camera man millions of years ago for recording dinosaurs.
AdvancedL2 did anyone ask?
Glizzyjulian On iOS
Alr this is my last response/edit
this is an open comment section, literally made for public opinions. Nobody like actually needs to ask.
the whole “didn’t ask” thing was everyone’s response to an argument for like 6 months ago. So unless u actually got a reason to argue, saying “I didn’t ask” means literally nothing.
Also I’m not defending my “joke” bc it makes no sense now, but when I wrote that my name was “I didn’t get the joke”
I feel people honestly don't appreciate or understand the vast amounts of time this all took place over. It's really mind-boggling. Generation after generation reproducing over endless time with little changes here and there eventually adding up to whole new species. It's crazy to think about, but totally makes sense.
All life on earth is dependent on the DNA molecule that regulates bodily functions and transmits hereditary information to progeny. That is very strong evidence for common ancestry in that there are about 1 million other molecules that could conceivably perform the same function.
*THE FACT THAT THE DNA MOLECULE IS BOTH HERITABLE AND MUTABLE MAKES EVOLUTION INEVITABLE.*
Here's one way to imagine vast amounts of time: Imagine that a meter stick represents 1000 years. 1 year would be a millimeter and 25 years would be an inch. 1 million years would be a kilometer. The age of the Earth would be about the width of the US.
Science writer Kenneth F. Weaver wrote of the Miocene epoch in National Geographic: "A gulf of mystery separates Aegyptopithecus at 33 million years and Australopithecus at four million. Candidates for intermediate ancestors that have been proposed at one time or another include two from Kenya known as Proconsul and Kenyapithecus; two from India, Pakistan, China, and Kenya called Ramapithecus and Sivapithecus; and two from Europe called Rudapithecus and Dryopithecus. These apelike creatures lived at various times between 8 and 20 million years ago."
"Despite much debate and speculation, none of these primates has been finally accepted as a human ancestor . . . the long geologic epoch known as the Miocene (24 million to 5 million years ago) will remain a largely veiled chapter in hominid evolution." Kenneth F. Weaver, The Search For Our Ancestors, National Geographic, November, 1985, pp.581-582.
Humans million years ago: Hunts various animals with ease
Humans now: Scared of flying cockroach
Edit: There’s a dumb conflict going on in my reply section
@@pureone8350 You know what’s sarcasm?
Lmao
☮
Evolution: create mechanism of fearing of the cockroaches, rats or other beings that spread disease so human can survive and spread his genes.
Human:Haha modern human fear bugs.
AAAA
why is no one talking about how beautiful the animation is.
@@malakaihernandez2235 sup
@@malakaihernandez2235 why you @ting me?
Cuz it's not
@@malakaihernandez2235 yep
@@malakaihernandez2235 true
Back in my day's.....
Have you been friends with gorillas and orangutans? (I know ur gonna say no)
" Reject Humanity. Return to Monke. " 🤝🏽
Grandpa??!!
@@hhfbko 😂
@@xx_stqrxappie_xx9740 What question it's that of course yes but not with gorillas.....-___- don't ask why
*"We live in a society exquisitely dependent on science and technology, in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology."* - Carl Sagan
Doesn't get more elitist than that. I bet Sagan couldn't tend to a tomato plant.
@@Rockhound6165 *_"WISE MEN SPEAK WHEN THEY HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY, FOOLS SPEAK BECAUSE THEY MUST SAY SOMETHING."_* Plato said that c. 300 BCE. You just confirmed your status as fool.
Truly a genius who walked amongst men.
@@Rockhound6165 "A wise man speaks when he has something to say. A fool speaks because he has to say something." - Plato (c. 400 BCE). Thanks for proving it is still true. You had best stick with rocks. Thinking is not something you are good at.
@@RandallWilkshurrrr durrrr look at me im soooooo smart i quoted Carl Sagan and Plato!!! I’m so much more intelligent than my inferior primate counterparts
This is the proof, cameramen are immortal
If apes evolved to humans then how come there is still apes and monkeys in the zoo
@@mathias5980 hahahahahahah. bruh. 😂😂😂😂.
@@mathias5980 most people are blind
Cameraman is God after all
@@mathias5980 You can’t be serious…
Monke no wanted leave tree. Monke leave tree. Sad monke. Now human.
Monke became sus!!1!1!!!1😳😳
Bro you made my day
monke now human and human want go to monke
we didnt evolve from monke
@@ayyvibin6977 Let me guess.Hardvore Christian???
"Reject humanity"
"Return to Monke"
I have ascended beyond you filthy mortals for I am now monke
@Bo Spoonson the way of monke has allowed me to answer the question: is water wet?
The answer is ......... yes’nt
Atheists be like: Grandpa! 😍
@Bo Spoonson cap
Hahahh why do you want to reject human?
This is how documentaries and video should be made on science
What blows my mind is that out of all the generations of hominids born before me stretching back millions of years; I was lucky enough to be born now, in the only time it's been possible to know about our hominid ancestors! *hits bong again*
Some of these 'ancestors' hang around the city bus transfer plaza I use. I guess that's where they got the models.
even our dinosaur ancestors
What if carnation is real
@@versedxxx8805 They are real. I have some in my garden.
@@kaks14 hahaha
F for that one ancestor who killed by the bear
@Bo Spoonson wait but how did those apes evolve but our "cousins" didn't?
@Bo Spoonson Nope. I aint related to all creature in the whole world. No animal has a black man dna! Maybe your race is related to canines but we're not
@@calvindike8402 dude, you're dna is almost the same as any other person on earth you doughnut
@@Rebelconformist82 that is one rare insult
@@xmimagma4630 yeah, I can safely say I've never used it before in my life. lol
" Man was now armed "
sounds more of a threat than a evolutionary level-up
Tier zoo reference?
@bleh fun fact:human are design to be omnivore
@bleh eating less meat won't help the planet idiot
fuck is going on
i just typed this comment because i thought its funny
i started a war without even knowing it
@bleh imagine being that vegan teacher fan
Atheism is a non prophet world view that rejects magic as an explanation.
expecto petronum
@@verizonextron Why bother?
The cameraman needs to get paid more ngl.
such a hard work to keep filming on and on for all those years 🙏🙏🙏
@@chazzywaz I agree.
@@esrauzuner3757 🙏🙏🙏
I might get the joke but its still animated
I heard he used TVA portals
Animals : *kills human*
Ancestors of early human : makes sharp stick
Animals : "so thats when my time was up and i was told to leave"
this is accurate
Lol
Humans are animal too.
Lmao
@Madara Uchiha i hate my life
Knowing they roamed an empty earth where there’s now cities and houses musta been surreal
Maybe because it is surreal when you actually think about it
@@crypto2633 every day is an existential crisis
I always think the same. Like just imagine running around haveing the time of your life and a fucking 19 foot spider swallows you whole
@@lawrencehile9902 no.
@@lawrencehile9902 No.
The most powerful and epic story of all - is truth. Far more fascinating than any creation myth.
No sir...evolution is a myth. Creation is a true story. We are all made in the image of the Living God. Not in the image of an ape. Do not let satan blind your eyes 😢
@@Allaboutjesus237 ignorant idiot wants to talk about myths. Lol, lmao even.
@@Allaboutjesus237 That’s like saying sexual reproduction is a myth and babies coming from storks is a true story.
@@Allaboutjesus237nobody wants to hear your bullshit about god
@@Allaboutjesus237shut up
Humans 10000 B.C.E:
" The future is going to be amazing. Endless opportunities for the human kind"
Humans 2021 C.E:
"I'm depressed. I don't want to be human anymore, all I want to be is monke"
Said no one
@@portillamail said reddit
@Supreme Chancellor I know, just stating the group of weirdos that chant this stuff
@@omegamyee5592 Return to monke
@Supreme Chancellor you are basiclly describing r/Opinion XD
Imagine million of years later they making video how humans todays looked like
That would actually be possible
I am just hoping that in the future, there would be no racism, homophobia, hypocrites, irrational beliefs, anymore, and various diverse people and different expressions exist even if I am already dead.
There’d be no need. They’d have pictures of us.
And that is true
that is like saying...what will be coolest killing spear look like in a million years from now from a caveman perspective. I promise you we will not be making videos a million years from now.
It's amazing that the skulls remain in the soil for millions of years for us to do such detailed scientific researches on. Without them, we never knew what they looked like or how they evolved. Fossils really are precious legacy of our ancestors.
Keep in mind that the conditions for preservation of the remains of plants and animals are rare and depend on the geologic processes of erosion and deposition. To be preserved as a fossil, the remains of an animal must be covered over, (deposition) soon after death; otherwise scavengers, bacteria, fungi and UV light will reduce them to dust. They can remain in that preserved state so long as they remain in subsurface deposits. Erosion can expose them and once again they will be acted upon by the destructive forces of nature. Some will be the consistency of chalk. They will become known to science only if a paleontologist or other knowledgeable person happens by and recognizes them for want they are.
Very seldom are fossils preserved anywhere near intact as were fossils of Archeopteryx. Those fossils were preserved in exquisite detail because they fell into oxygen depleted lagoons and were slowly covered with fine silt. That silt formed layers that hardened into lithographic limestone, a dense fine grained sedimentary rock forming thin layers that separate easily to form a very smooth surface. It was for that reason that this form of limestone was used for a printing process called lithography.
Those layers could often be opened like a book exposing a fossil and its mirror image, referred to a 'slab' and 'counter slab'. The name Archeopteryx lithographica, originally assigned to a single feather and so named due to being discovered in such deposits.The first body fossil was discovered in Germany in 1861 and secured for the British Museum by the famous anatomist Sir Richard Owen, now known as the 'London Specimen'. A later (1881), more complete fossil, now referred to as the 'Berlin Specimen' had the head with teeth and a snout rather than a beak. To date, there have been a total of 12 archaeopteryx fossils discovered.
and every single such relic that gets destroyed is a loss of information that we can never learn
@@RandallWilks I tried to read your comment, but got exhausted! Why don't you write briefly? That would be useful.
@@404epnf7 You apparently suffer from dyslexia. How sad. I understand treatment is available. Have you sought help? ;-)
@@404epnf7 Bwahahahahahaha!!!! Wow. I had no idea dyslexics were so sensitive about their condition. It seems you also have anger issues and fortunately for you, there is treatment is available for that.
Denial is not refutation. There is a reason creationists keep attacking a man who has been dead for 130 years; it's a soft target, so much easier to attack a dead man than evolution itself which comes from the combined work of the millions of scientists in multiple fields of study.
Denial as you say is most commonly seen as = a reaction to what is not understood. Yet as you alluded to one can today avail themselves to information such that the argument of "not knowing" becomes a pitiful excuse as everything is out in the open and easily accessible.
Therefore "denialism" comes to be emblematic of what is really = _"ideological irrationality."_ People who have hitched their wagons as it were to what are usually dogmatic, static beliefs for which they are unable/willinging to let go - to say nothing of considering other possibilities.
Such a paradigm becomes little more than = _"willful ignorance."_ They attack via "abstracts" and as you say "soft targets" - which are merely "foils" they use to justify their denialism - because in the end they have no plausible counterpoint. Everything they claim to believe in represents subjective assumption of validity = which is impossible to quantify to others as it is only real for the individual contingent upon their desire to believe it. 🤨
@@varyolla435 Right on.
I believe in evolutionary creationion
@@varyolla435Actually adam had parents and he was not the first human, same as eve (he is the ancestor of homo sapiens/neanderthals), and he from earlier human race. Later jews aded Hypotheses and myths about him.
@@educationforblind6362 Nobody gives a shit what you choose to believe. Beliefs exist in the human mind and cannot be distinguished from delusions. TRUTH is determined by EVIDENCE.
go back I want to be monke
Your comment reminded me of the "upgrade., fuck go back!" meme 😂
Me too🐵🐒🦍🦍🦧🦧
We were never monkeys
We are made of dust
@@toastmaker5696 don't reject truth
“they gathered and ate everything” ah i see so thats where i got it
Lol wtf
Do you eat durians though?
"oh,i found shit, lets taste it"
@@oreo_249 lololololol
LOL I get it
Humans billions of years ago: killing elephants with ease
Humans now: *scared of barking dog*
Bruh lol yeah
Croner God r/wooooosh it’s a fucking joke you don’t have to ruin it with your smart ass
Elijah Mathews Henry elephants can tusk you or stomp you
you mean scared of a little rat
im not scared wen i have my spear with me :P
Fun Fact; Female humans are the only mammals with permanent breasts. They are a product of sexual selection. They, like our outwardly curved lips, are sexual attractants missing in our closest primate relatives. At puberty, estrogens, in conjunction with growth hormone, cause permanent breast growth in female humans. It is no coincidence that women will emphasize both breasts and lips to enhance their attractiveness.
In contrast, Monotreme mammals (the egg laying platypus and echidnas) don't have breasts or even nipples. They secrete milk from patches of skin that their offspring lick up.
Another fact: Our earliest mammalian ancestors also laid eggs. The evidence is in our DNA and that of all mammals. Every mammal has 3 genes for the production of yolk; VT1,VT2 and VT3. Those 3 genes are present and active in non-mammalian vertebrates (birds and reptiles) and were presumably active in primitive mammaliaformes, the Mesozoic forerunners to mammals.
However, in almost all mammals, those genes have been disabled by mutations that created either a premature STOP codon or a frame shift the scrambled subsequent DNA sequences. In monotremes however, one of those genes remains active and they produce a dime sized egg with a small yolk. That egg is secreted into a pouch where it hatches within days.
genetics is just the world's craziest object-oriented programming
@@MattSuguisAsFondAsEverrr Your assertion lacks corroborating evidence and cannot be distinguished from a lie and is therefore dismissed as such.
Damn the ardipithicus swinging in the tree part is cursed lol so uncanny
I was looking for a comment abt that 🤣🤣
Ha
Thank god for evolution you are gorgeous
@GRAPHENE IS IN THE MASKS, SWABS and PCR TESTS!!! bruh
Ikr wtf
wish i had a time machine so i could know wtf happened back then
They're on sale at Costco, so better hurry.
The day consists of Waking up when light out(since they didnt know about time they only knew that dark means sleep liggt means hunt) go out and hunt animals(took them about 3-9 hours) than bringing the food back and cooking it thats basically what they did
I agree with you the world is so mysterious it always make us curious!!! Most of the scientific explanation are just hypothetical and based on what they observe around but no clear evidences!!! If the human came from apes!!! Why the monkeys nowadays doesn't evolve? They're still a monkey!!! And if you guys say that those monkeys like Australopithecus, homo erectus, and etc: evolves to human being!!! But what's the origination too of those monkeys? Where did they came from? And how it diversified into different races?
@@honeybadger469 The evidence is in the DNA and how these animals - birds, giraffes, snakes etc. - have adapted to their environments.
How do you know monkeys are NOT EVOLVING into something akin to humans, after all they've come from the same evolutionary branch? No one knows. Evolution is not quiescent. But then again why should they evolve into humans? They've stayed pretty much a monkey over the millennia, albeit with certain adaptations. They found their niche, i.e, jungle/rainforests, and their environment didn't demand that they become anything more than a monkey, nor did they have a desire to step outside that environment, unlike man.
What's the origin of monkeys? Man and chimp shared a common ancestor about 6 million years ago, at which point there was a divergence in the evolutionary branch. The origin of all mammals come from those small ground dwelling animals that existed at the time of the dinosaurs. When that meteorite hit the earth some 66 million years ago and wiped out the dinosaurs as well as the majority of animal species on earth, those ground dwelling animals began their ascent to become the dominant species on earth.
@@jamesanthony5681 @James Anthony 😂😂😂😂oh really? They just jumped into this conclusions only on their own analytical observations in the environment!!! But these are still questionable: the question is where did the man and chimp that shared common ancestors came from? What's the origin of these creatures? Also the animals that dwelling on small ground? They must also have an origin! What is this? Did they just grow like a plant? 😂😂and aside from that how did they know that? Are they already alive that time? And take note they know the exact year 6 million years ago!!!
Human in the future:
A N I M E E Y E S
What I mean is big eyes but y'know
@@kalvon only a weeb would say that
@@aizn7147 stop the cap
@@aizn7147 that's impossible I highly doubt humans will continue evolving with the stuff we have
@@aizn7147 how am I worrying?
The difference between faith and insanity is that insanity is the ability to hold firmly to a conclusion that is incompatible with the evidence, whereas faith is the ability to hold firmly to a conclusion that is incompatible with the evidence.
in science you learn not to say we have proof its not even observed evolution lol
inductive reasonings for pokemons
@@amosamwig8394 Thanks for once again demonstrating your abysmal ignorance of anything related to science. Get a brain.
@@amosamwig8394 Meh.
@@amosamwig8394everyone observes evolution. You are evolving.
Thank you for your work Randall
Humans then: finally i can make tools
Humans now: go back i want to be monke
*STOP EVELUTION RETURN TO MONKE*
@@NAYEONiZ SHut up the jokes over used find something original
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Hmmm MONKE
@@piglin469 you dont want to let us become monke?
*Then you must suffer*
@@willowgoober I have a gun in my poket its ever be the same like us or die. or go to robot hell
That was a key stage, when they started to bury the dead, showed care and respect for other individuals plus the thinking process to prevent the body from being consumed by other preditory animals.
Good though, but don't you think another spieces don't respect other individuals
Uh good
The birth of morals and ethics!
Rats don't care if you're a king or a peasant.
Sorry buddy, humans actually devolved over time, we were stronger taller and had much more knowledge than we do now.. darwinism explained away slavery. God bless you all.
0:31 "wait, its all mango?" "always has been"
You got minecraft java edition
@@lucamcardle729 what?
@@boi_johnson do u play minecraft?
@@lucamcardle729 yea why
@@boi_johnson what edition? I have java edition and i wanna play on a realm with someone
FUN FACT: All chordates possess a tail and pharyngeal slits at some point in their lives, and humans are no exception. Early on in human development, the embryo has both a tail and pharyngeal slits, both of which are lost during the course of development. Pharyngeal slits are openings in the pharynx of a vertebrate embryo that develop into gill arches in the bony fishes and into the jaws and inner ear in the terrestrial vertebrates. Pharyngeal slits and tails are found in the embryos of all vertebrates because they share as common ancestors the fish in which these structures first evolved.
Every human embryo starts to develop a tail for a brief period during our embryonic development. At between 4 and 5 weeks of age, the normal human embryo has 10-12 developing tail vertebrae. It is most pronounced at around day 31 to 35 of gestation and then regresses into the four or five fused vertebrae becoming our coccyx.
A similar thing happens in the dolphin embryo. Hind limb buds form in early embryos, but just as with the human tail, they are usually resorbed prior to birth. Usually, but not always. On very rare occasions, cetaceans have been found with external hind limbs (flippers).
One such four finned dolphin with well-developed, symmetrical fins, later named Haruka, was captured by Japanese fishermen in 2006 in the cove at Taiji, Kujirakan province, Japan. (The location made infamous by the documentary "The Cove".) Initially it was one of 108 dolphins rounded up at one time for slaughter. Because of its unusual appendages it was spared and kept as the featured attraction in the aquarium of the Taiji Whale Museum. As with other dolphins at the aquarium it was trained to invert for regular physical examination. It died in 2014 and has been preserved for future study.
يبدو انك تعرف الكثير عن التطور اتسمح لي ان اسئلك بعض الأسئلة
Human Genome is a book, each chapter describing the description and recipe of a common ancestor.
From Zygote to birth, an individual completes the full evolution from a single-cell organism to a Human infant.
@@earth2k66Sorry, but that is wrong. What you stated is, in essence, the 19th century hypothesis put forth by German biologist Ernst Haeckel; "Ontogeny recapitulates Phylogeny". Despite similarities of early embryos, the hypothesis does not standup to closer examination.
@@عبدالرحمنالجلد-س4ي Fire away.
The fact that we’re on the same planet where all this happened so many millions of years ago is incredible
what if the place you are living at is the exact same place they stepped on
God created earth and we were never apes
@@GradySimms2744 shut
@@GradySimms2744 talking like you have proof shut up
@@GradySimms2744 dont think god created everything like poop
5:57 : "Last step was to colonize the planet"
britishers in 18th century : let's do the last step again
Britishers isn’t a word
GRAMMER
@@richardmanalac2305”grammer”
Damn, my ancestors were ripped af. And I am here watching this video while eating fries all day.
Yea and thats black ppl that were the first origin people...have to show respect that they still look the same to day.And some changed due to their surroundings :)
@@saffaanuman3885 what?
@@saffaanuman3885 you say WHAAAAAT? No black man I know revolve like this. They as all other homosapiens were created human.
@@saffaanuman3885 lmaaoo, wtf??
@@saffaanuman3885 dude wtf???
GOD WAS A TREMENDOUS INVENTION AND A GREAT BENEFIT TO MANKIND. Before man created God, they felt really stupid. Confronted with any question, all they could say was "Gee, I don't know" and no matter how hard they thought, they couldn't think of a better answer.
Then someone came up with the brilliant idea of God. It was wonderful, it obviated the need to think about anything. The answer could always be "Gee, I don't know, it must be God." Problem solved. The "God concept" alleviated the need to think about mundane things and they could concentrate on serious questions, like "How many bibles can we sell?" There was no incentive for human intellect to advance beyond that of ancient goat herders. Religions need to perpetuate ignorance in order to preserve their influence.
It is quite likely that the "god concept" originated with Homo erectus as an explanation for thunder.
Thinking that humans Descend from animals is casa of psychiatric hospitalization
@@Ympatisec2K24 Your ignorance and cognitive deficiency not withstanding, "Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution". - Theodosius Dobzhansky
TRUTH is determined by EVIDENCE, not by what anyone says and not by words in an old book. The rules of evidence are this:
IF YOU DON'T HAVE ANY... *YOU LOSE!*
My little brother walked in during the half human half monkey part and asked if I was watching monkey porn
Good times
Say yes
Guess he drank dad's angry juice huh?
wtf, monkey porn exists?
Rule 34, if it exists there is porn of it
@@godzillaglasses3629 oof I dont get it
One thing I learned.... we evolved into scared humans from fearless animals
Hell no
better to be a smart coward rather than an ignorant brave person.
A living coward? Or a dead hero?
No, I’m a chicken.
Fearless? I really don't think so. Fear is one of the biggest factor that motives our behavior and make us vulnerable to manipulation
0:53 searching for your phone charger in the dark
😁
Imagine you see red eyes
Uhh
Ngl it’s so annoying seeing all the religious people in the comments trying to make this a debate 🫤
idk many atheist refusing evolutionary theory when they hearing about genetical defrences between races and struggle between human species in the form of colonization and imperialism
Creationists do not debate. Debates require exchange of verifiable evidence which they do not have. They just argue and argue and.... "Nuh-uh", "Nuh-uh", "Nuh-uh", ad infinitum.
ANON, aka @ben7572 joined YT 4 years ago and has amassed 7 subscribers in that time. Judging from his incoherent posts, one has to wonder how he got that many.
Actually it is hilarious...... 🍿
@@varyolla435 fair enough tbh
4:07 rare video of man without wifi
I should put you on r/Im14andthisisdeep
r/ThanksIHateIt
@@millennium091 check your mom too
Ok boomer
Whitout?? Or without
6:36 Oh no, run great x25000 grandpa
needs more 0
@@ForumLight lul stfu
@@ForumLight this is your problem, you are asserting that an organism without lungs cannot evolve lungs.
But I asked you before if you assert something then you must give evidence to prove that assertion otherwise you have no room to talk.
@@ForumLight take your meds
@@ForumLight I never said that what cant be disprove is true, Im Saying that you are asserting that it's impossible for evolution to occur. The burden on proof is on you now to prove why it cannot happen. This is not to prove evolution but to rather to let you know that you can't be 100% certain with what you say.
*"Man was now armed."*
That sounded amazing and highly ominous at the same time
Ah yes stone gun 🗿
🔫 👈
I thought I was the only one who thought hearing that statement felt badass.
*stone gun.*
We need stone gun. 🗿
It’s why you exist as you do
no shit they have an arm
You can deny the value of the Theory of Evolution to Biology all you want, but it will gain you as much respect as denying the Spherical Earth.
Listen weetard your non-white skull can't comprehend anything but whatever the Eternal Kike shills to you. Silence your swarthoid noises.
TH-cam: *sees naked ape* that's all good
TH-cam: *sees naked human* TAKE IT DOWN TAKE IT DOWN
Anoobguykid because it’s meant for education
।
This comment deserves more likes. Underrated 😂
Yesss
@@Nutshellin-zn6pz what education? Im not learning anything looking at some fake trash
Old day humans:not scared of a mammoth Humans now:*scared of spiders*
Bruh im afraid of daddy long legs ;_;
Old humans literally killed the biggest animals and yet were scared of spiders
Spiders is Pet in Australia
@@mfra959 oh shoot that means even more scarier insects or bugs
Humans now: Afraid of Free Speech.
2:08 The first Belle Delphine
monke tiddies
Lol
Personality trait planed for go fof mankind
Extinction is the rule. Survival is the exception.
Reject modernity, Return to monke
no
yes
Why? Dude
@@malakaihernandez2235 its a meme, why do you care?
@@witachapinamk1507 the dude literally commented over 300 times about that lmao
Early humans: killed elephants
Humans now: scared of a mosquito
Also humans: I am a geniusssssss!
I mean
If other animals evolved reason and discovered what diseases are they'd be scared too
I'd say annoyed more than scared.
No one is scared of a mosquito
You're not, you can't spell genius.
@@angrydorito3252 the op is
" for millions of years our planet has been floating in space "
Yes. That's what a planet does
😂😂
Try billions
Underrated lol
@@pashapasovski5860 there’s no proof that the earth has been here for billions of years
If we evolved from monkeys then why are mokeys turning into humans today, the world has forgit its creator WHICH IS GOD THE ALMIGHTY 👑✝️!
*Does every scientific organization in the world endorse evolution as a fact? YES.*
*Do all science organizations in the world regard evolution as a branch of science? YES.*
*DO Biology departments of every secular university in the world back evolution? YES.*
*Does the Biology department of Baptist Baylor University teach evolution? YES it does.*
*DO the Geology departments of every secular university in the world endorse evolution? YES.*
*Does the Geology department of Baptist Baylor University endorse evolution? YES it does.*
*Does the Episcopalian church endorse evolution? YES it does.*
*Does the Catholic Church endorse evolution? YES it does.*
*Does the United Methodist Church? YES it does.*
*Does the Presbyterian Church? YES it does.*
Do creationists accept the evidence for evolution? NO, because their belief system requires them to reject any evidence that does not support their biblical interpretation. They grew up with that belief. It was not reasoned into them, and most likely cannot be reasoned out of them. One cannot reason with those who reject its use. That would be like giving medicine to a dead man.
True. Creationism is both fake science and is a fake religion too, as it pretends to be scientific.
Thanks to the animation team who worked hard for this
Nah thanks to the cameraman who live million years ago.
Wait you telling me they didn't go back in time and started recording?
Yes, to perpetuate a myth...
@@PauloPereira-jj4jv this isn't a myth its a fact
Exactly!
Throwing the spear away was probably the dumbest thing the man could have done when the bear attacked.
Yeah true bears are stronger than Gorillas what’s even dumber is a farmer tried to beat up a bear the farmer kicked the bear in the balls and ran away luckily the farmer wasn’t hurt and Also even some humans today with guns like rifles humans still die
i don't think a spear would do anything good to a bear
@@catsbacon Lets put that theory to the test with a metallic spear.
@jensphiliphohmann1876 - So, you've had a lot of experience, eh?
Maybe cuz he didn’t have his homies
The earliest humans also developed a freaking six packs and muscles 💪🏻
Cuz they were on the go 24/7 lol
Yea because they had to both hunt all there food and build anything they needed lol
Heck, They're Stronger than ME! (now that's embarrassing)
Muscles? Yes. Six packs? no
@@Blu-gi7wb lol
Evolution from one variety of ape to another variety of ape.
3:13 “Are ya winning, son?”
onebacondoggo no dad
@@happyboi6972 aw man
"always had been dad"
@Tip_OverKillsツ ?
@Tip_OverKillsツ Fuck you
My god I’m really really high and planned to come watch something funny but WOW this is sooooo damn cool
James Kodak nice 👍
There is hope for humanity! If you can do it while high, others can too.
As long as you learned something.
I learned that our species went through different types of skulls🤣
Heeeck yeah your awesome
Lol me too, guess something about this video attracts the high.
"A skeptic will question claims, then embrace the evidence. A denier will question claims, then reject the evidence."
A denier first learns a set of default claims without questioning them. Then the denier will question new claims and reject the evidence if it contradicts the default claims
@Larry Cavalli I'm not gonna explain the 2000 out of 2500 prophecies that have already been fulfilled in the bible but this is absolutely insane. There is historical evidence for the bible. We know david lived because on a stone from thousands of years ago there is a message, "from the house of david". Commonly known from the bible. To believe there isn't a G-d rejects morality in the past and how consciousness came to light. We did not get smarter over time, we made discoveries that helped in modern time. Just because you can carbon date something doesn't mean it's millions of years old. They are watching the carbon decrease over time, assuming that it didn't start somewhere (the creation). And before the fall we knew everything was bigger. The bible speaks of giants and huge animals, because along with age, everything got smaller. "Professing to be wise, they become fools". Romans 1:22 in the next 20 years the world will end because of the temple and one world government that will take over, then you're eyes might be opened.
@@josephsack4918 The Bible containing historical facts does not make all of it accurate. To believe there isn't a god does not at all reject morality or how consciousness came to light. You're making the same mistakes our ancestors did, who believed lightning came from the gods because they had no explanation. Just because we can't explain something, doesn't mean some god did it. The only honest answer is admitting that you don't know.
If you want to make such a ludicrous claim, you're going to have to come with more than some vague and most of the time untrue prophecies.
In 20 years I can say with utmost certainty that the world will not end. Fools have been claiming this bullshit for centuries, even most Christians acknowledge that no one can know when the world will end. You are one of those people professing to be wise, yet having become a fool.
@@joshuak4599 no, christians don't say they don't know, nobody knows the day or the hour. But the season yes, the bible says so. And our ancestors might have said that lighting was from gods but consciousness is not at all observable. You can see nerves communicating and other things with the brain but not emotion or being aware of anything. The fact that we can see something with balls in out head is insane, and believing that was chance is just so stupid. The honest answer is it came from G-d because nothing else can explain it and will never be able to, because it's not observable in any way. We can't fathom it. "If you try to understand G-d you will end up not believing in him". Read that slowly and let it sink in. The fact that our ancestors had any ability to come up with reasons for why there was lightning (because they were observing with awareness) just shows they were smarter than people now. at least they realized that you can't have an ability to observe something without someone granting you that. Now we have discovered how to make devices that help us observe and we now know everything in nature has a scientific explanation. Which just suggests G-d even more. If one thing was off we wouldn't be here. But how do people explain that today?? Oh just give it 4.6 BilLioN years and boom. Ridiculous even thinking about it. But if that's what you wanna believe just know this, you are fulfilling G-ds servants prophecies of the end believing in that.
@@josephsack4918 "The fact that we can see something with balls in out head is insane, and believing that was chance is just so stupid."
- Sorry to say, but your opinions are worth absolutely nothing to me. That argument is as valuable as me saying you're stupid as proof of your lack of intelligence.
"The honest answer is it came from G-d because nothing else can explain it and will never be able to, because it's not observable in any way."
- Refer to the cavemen trying to explain lightning.
" "If you try to understand G-d you will end up not believing in him". Read that slowly and let it sink in."
- That's worth nothing. You could claim that about anything that seems unbelievable.
Try to understand Zeus, and you'll end up not believing in him.
"The fact that our ancestors had any ability to come up with reasons for why there was lightning (because they were observing with awareness) just shows they were smarter than people now."
- How does that show they are smarter than people now? People now are able to come up with reasons, and are smart enough to realize that these theories require evidence.
I could explain lightning by claiming they're farts of conscious clouds, but that would only be a hypothesis.
"Now we have discovered how to make devices that help us observe and we now know everything in nature has a scientific explanation. Which just suggests G-d even more"
- And how does that even suggest any god? All it suggests is that we're pretty smart animals.
"If one thing was off we wouldn't be here. But how do people explain that today??"
- Horribly flawed reasoning. There is no need for an explanation, it's exactly that.
If one thing was off, we wouldn't be here discussing this. That does not mean anything.
"Oh just give it 4.6 BilLioN years and boom. Ridiculous even thinking about it."
- Perhaps you simply don't realize how unfathomably long a period of 4.6 billion years is. We can already see that with time and pressure, organisms change over the generations. Even with just millions of years, those changes add up and lead to entirely different beings. Your limited perception says more about you than it does about evolution.
" But if that's what you wanna believe just know this, you are fulfilling G-ds servants prophecies of the end believing in that."
- And if you want to believe your claims, know that you are worshiping Satan who has tricked you into thinking he is God.
Believing what you do now, you only worship Satan.
That is as truthful as your last sentence.
THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS ARE WHAT REAL SCIENTISTS SAY.
The creationist answer: "Nuh-uh", "Nuh-uh", "Nuh-uh", ad nauseum
They think it is a really powerful argument.
Me when I was 9 turning off the lights in the livingroom: 6:28
I also did that
Same
I thought I was a pu$$y
But now I am confirmed that everyone was 😁😁
That's hilarious ! 🤣🤣
Sometimes
This was so nostalgic
I remember me and my monkey friends where climbing trees eating fruit
@@valentinzaeuner I don’t want you here
@@valentinzaeuner disgusting
@@valentinzaeuner tell Jesus I want to be MONKEY
@@thewonderfulworldofsammy7776 stop like your own commmt
@@thewonderfulworldofsammy7776 i hate atheist disgusting apes u claim u are
3:06 props to the camera man almost getting attacked by the ape woman...
camera man has balls of titanium
@@mrcaptainfarte3619 I’m the cameraman 🤯
😆😆😆😆
How do you know that's a women? Maybe they are non-binary. Smh people have no hearts /s
@@parthsharma005 lmao you can’t choose your gender if your born a man your a man for the rest of your life if your born a girl you a girl forever but nice joke
the animation is beautiful
6:35 bro why didn’t the cameraman do anything
nice one
LOL
@Whisperr Art LMFAO.
Lmao
THE MONK, IS STILL, HERE, HE NEVER LEFT
Evolution: Whew! That took quite a long time!
God: 7 days. I got it.
The problem is, there is no god.
Creatard logic: magic is faster than science so it must be true
EDIT: For that comment by S F below: It is literally the opposite of science and logic to believe in a supernatural, uncreated creator. Look up the logical fallacy of “special pleading”.
@@walkergarya There is tho.
@@Rationalist101 Nope.
@@walkergarya don't blind yourself. You're created and have an expiry date and time that no one knows about, as everything and everybody you see around you, perishable. Logically, scientifically, there has to be a starting point that was never created, all knowing, doesn't need sustaintance, all seeing, etc... which what people call God or the creator or Allah.
Millions of years passed and millions might come ahead, therefore for this 100 years we might live inside this body must have a purpose to fulfill before we move on and get ready to understand a different spectrum. I hope you ponder upon.
4:25 me trying to find who made all the bad decisions in my life
🤣
🤟😂🤟
😂😂😂😂
LMAO
@@geethkakinada8503 gfao
source 'trust me bro'
Meanwhile, in some place called REALITY the proof for evolution is vast and numerous: Endogenous retroviruses, pseudogenes, syncytin, antibiotic research, ring species, domesticated animals, vestigial tails, auricular muscles in humans, arrector pili muscles in humans, continental distribution, chromosome 2 in humans, cytochrome c and b, vomeronasal organs in humans, nested Hierarchs and classification, homologous structures, divergence, appendixes, wisdom teeth, Plica semilunaris, Nictitating membranes, endemism and the observable speciation in American Goatsbeard flowers.
Aka against your religion
nah just look in the mirror
Evidence of Flying donkey 🐴 source: trust me bro 🤣🤣🤣
Happy to be ex Muslim atheist
When you're girlfriend says "ooga booga" to another dudes rock
Lol.
@Jin p eye sea what you did their
OH NO
If I show this to my catholic Mexican family they’d probably send me to confess to the priest
I don't understand? Evolution was always accepted by Catholicism, I never remember anything anti-evolution in my schooling, and I remember a Pope, not sure who, talking about the evolution of man. Although my own mother didn't believe modern humans were descended from anything ape-like, my father did, and I always accepted the fact without ever feeling it was in anyway subversive to religion. I was always a believer in God and evolution. Irish Catholic by the way.
billie astotel Idk dude my family is hella into religion they believe everything and don’t question anything, they don’t believe in the evolution just the Andan and Eve thing, in the catholic schools in Mexico evolution is seen as a “sin” why? Well Idk
These creatures are definitely human like and they most certainly existed we have them in our fossil records, but there is absolutely no proof whatsoever of humans evolving from them. Our species appear suddenly in the fossil records with no connection. The term "missing link" is still being pursued. The answer I believe will be biblical in nature in the end.
Jesus Christ isn’t a religion it’s a relationship with the one true God and a priest can’t forgive your sins only Jesus can do that
@12BJJohnson The Catholic Church does not hold a stance against evolution. It is not a sin at all to accept evolution according to the Church, as long as you believe it was guided by God.
4:23 me looking for my mom in the grocery store
*HOW EVOLUTION WORKS* It is helpful to understand that evolution is a molecular process. The random mutations that naturally occur during cell division and replication (mitosis and meiosis) are the raw material for the genetic variation we see in every population of organisms. Mutations are ongoing and continuous for every living species. Mutations are essential to evolution; they are the raw material of genetic variation. Without mutation, evolution could not occur. WITH mutations, evolution is inevitable.
[NOTE: My original essay had links to applicable illustrations and scientific studies, but TH-cam keeps deleting it. My apologies for their absence here.]
Those genetic variants are subjected to a selection process that is performed by whatever environment the organisms find themselves. In this respect, evolution is an ongoing, continuous set of natural experiments. Those that work get perpetuated, those that don't, perish. It is as if the environment acted as an umpire who says "There are good mutations and there are bad mutations and there are neutral mutations, but they ain't nuthin' until I (the environment) calls 'em." That is Natural Selection. Neutral mutations just go along for the ride producing neither immediate benefit nor harm (Genetic Drift).
The result of those selection processes is organisms best suited for their current environment. Should that environment change, it would put the population under stress. If the population gene pool has sufficient genetic variation it increases the likelihood that at least some offspring should be able to survive and perpetuate the species (albeit one of slightly different genetic makeup).
What everyone should understand is that genetic changes do not occur because of some 'need'. The mutations are RANDOM and get selected if they are USEFUL. That is a process called Natural Selection and it is anything BUT random.
Let's take the example of the Panda. Bears in general are omnivores, eating plant matter, but with a marked preference for meat when available. The preferred food of the Panda however, is bamboo leaves, which have such low nutritional value that they must eat almost continuously. The Panda would certainly be able to extract more nutrition with a four chambered stomach (as in ungulates and whales) or something akin to a cecal valve that would slow the passage of food, but it has neither in its genetic toolbox. In feeding themselves, pandas are continuously stripping bamboo leaves from their stalks, a process that could be facilitated if they had a grasping thumb.
Bears however do not have thumbs, nor do they have genes for them in their genetic toolbox. Nor do new features simply spring into existence. However, if a slightly altered body component provides some benefit, natural selection will perpetuate it. Evolution is descent with modification and results in incremental alterations to what is already there.
As an analogy, imagine a robot gardener dragging a hose around various obstacles it encounters in a garden until it can go no further. Now an intelligent gardener could simply retrace his steps and take a different path, avoiding those obstacles. The robot gardener (evolution) is not an intelligent force and cannot do that. With a limited tool kit, it can only (figuratively) add more hose to get the job done.
While a thumb would be quite useful to a panda for stripping leaves, evolution cannot rewind to produce one. Instead, it has taken "a piece of hose' (a wrist bone) and enlarged it to act as a stand in for a thumb. That is not an elegant solution and not a perfect one, but it gets the job done. Evolution is does not produce perfect solutions, but tweaks here and there to get the job done". THAT is how evolution operates. The panda’s "thumb", developed over thousands of generations of holding things, is clearly an enlarged bone (the “radial sesamoid”) in the the paw of a bear.
Based in part on the fact that no tetrapods, (terrestrial vertebrates) exist in the fossil record prior to about 370 million years ago, the Theory of Evolution would predict that tetrapods evolved from fish. If that were the case, there should have existed at one time a fish with characteristics of both fish and tetrapods. In other words a Transitional Species. Until about 2005, there was only scattered evidence for such a creature. There were however, a class of fish called Sarcopterygians or Lobe Finned Fishes, that dominated Devonian seas. What characterized those lobe finned fishes was that those fins were supported by external bones and muscles. Those bones, a single bone, connected to two bones connected to smaller bones, are homologous to the limb bones of all tetrapods, including humans. Most Sarcopterygian Fishes have long been extinct, but they are survived today by two species of coelacanth and six species of lungfish.
Still, what was missing was a fossil showing characteristics of fish AND tetrapods. When Neil Shubin and his team decided to search for a fossil that filled the gap between the Lobe Finned Fishes that dominated Devonian Seas and the earliest tetrapod fossils represented by Ichthyostega and Acanthostega dated about 370 mya. Since those fossils were found in geologic deposits indicating a freshwater environment and if the Theory of Evolution is correct in its hypothesis that tetrapods evolved from fish, then transitional fossils should be found in similar deposits somewhat older in age. The problem was that geologic deposits of that age are exposed at few places on the earth's surface.
Fortunately, a great deal of geologic exploration has been done throughout the world, financed often times by oil and mining interests. They selected an area in the Canadian Arctic, Ellesmere Island, as having the greatest likelihood of success. It took them 4 expeditions over 4 years, searching during the short summers of that hostile environment but finally succeeded in 2004, returning with 9 specimens of the fish they named Tiktaalik (an Inuit word meaning large freshwater fish).
It was exactly what one would expect a transitional fish-tetrapod to look like and was found in deposits dated 375 mya. If this was not the direct ancestor of tetrapods, it was something very much like it.This is a great example of using evolutionary theory as a predictive tool.
Btw, biointeractive(dot)org is a great source of information for all of science. If anyone has an interest in expanding their knowledge of science they should use it.
The genetic variation within a population is referred to as a gene pool. Organisms can move freely within that population breeding with each other, perpetuating any new mutations that work and eliminating those that are less than optimal. Each offspring will most resemble its parents, yet will vary slightly genetically because of unique mutations acquired during meiosis. Thus the genetic makeup of a population will change ever so slightly with each successive generation.
Populations are not stable, they expand and contract with changing conditions. So long as there is sufficient genetic variation within a population there will be some members capable of surviving those conditions and perpetuating the species. The alternative is extinction.
When populations expand and migrate to new territories, some portions of it will become genetically isolated from each other and no longer share a common gene pool. In such cases, each such sub population will carry a subset of the parent population genome, but subsequent mutations will be unique to each new population (the genotype) that will come to differentiate that population from others (Genetic Drift).
To the extent that such populations encounter differing environmental conditions, that environment will exert different evolutionary pressures on that population. New mutations will have a much greater chance of coming to dominance within a smaller population than they would in the larger parent population where they would be one among the many. Over thousands of generations genetic differences accumulate in the different gene pools making interbreeding ever more difficult until at some point speciation can be said to have occurred. Because speciation is a process, rather than an event, it would be no more possible to pinpoint where speciation occurred than to identify where on the color spectrum orange becomes red.
God created everything how dare you reject God
@@YoItsmike171 GOD WAS A TREMENDOUS INVENTION AND A GREAT BENEFIT TO MANKIND. Before man created God, they felt really stupid. Confronted with any question, all they could say was "Gee, I don't know" and no matter how hard they thought, they couldn't think of a better answer.
Then someone came up with the brilliant idea of God. It was wonderful, it obviated the need to think about anything. The answer could always be "Gee, I don't know, it must be God." Problem solved. The "God concept" alleviated the need to think about mundane things and they could concentrate on serious questions, like "How many bibles can we sell?" There was no incentive for human intellect to advance beyond that of ancient goat herders. Religions need to perpetuate ignorance in order to preserve their influence.
It is quite likely that the "god concept" originated with Homo erectus as an explanation for thunder.
*FACTS ABOUT THE BIBLE* People reading the bible should realize that every single supposed incident took place within an extremely small radius of the middle east. According to Barnes' Notes on the Bible, the direct distance of Babylon from Jerusalem is about 520 miles (as the crow flies); the more circuitous route used by caravans or armies went via Carchemish and the Orontes valley, is about 900 miles. The shorter route was through the Syrian Desert and few survived that trip.
Virtually every other event in the bible took place in a much smaller radius of Jerusalem, the capitol of the Kingdom of Judah. The Judahites (the original Jews), were genetically identical to Canaanites, their alphabet and language both derived from Canaanite precursors, as was their religion. Genetically, the 'Israelites' were Canaanites, as were the Edomites, Ammonites, Phoenecians and other peoples of the Levant. The Philistines however, were foreign invaders that took over 5 coastal cities. The "Israelites" were pastoral Canaanites that left coastal areas for the hill country and established a separate identity.
According to Bible Odyssey, Egypt is mentioned in the Hebrew Bible almost seven hundred times, and it is referred to another 25 times in the New Testament, making it the most frequently mentioned place name outside Canaan in the Bible. Egypt during biblical times, was already an ancient civilization and the pyramids were thousands of years old.
For all the times Egypt is mentioned in the bible, never once was there any reference either the pyramids or the Great Sphinx, most likely because those who wrote the bible were never there.
For instance, there is no mention in any Egyptian writing of any of the biblical patriarches who supposedly vistited there; not Abraham and Sarah; not of Joseph who supposedly attained high rank in Pharaoh's court; nor any mention of his supposed progeny, the Israelites, that supposedly spent 400 years in slavery there. Not once is there any mention of a man named Moses, nor anyone like him. According to the bible, Moses also supposedly had high rank in a later pharaoh's court yet there is no mention of him in Egyptian records. According to the bible, Moses was saved as an infant by his mother floating him down the Nile in a reed boat.
That story is virtually identical to the that of Sargon II (aka 'Sargon the Great'), a real person, known to history as ruler of the Neo Assyrian Empire who in 721 BCE defeated and destroyed the ancient Kingdom of Israel, making it the Assyrian province Samaria. The legend of Sargon II as a baby being saved by his mother by floating him in a reed boat down the Euphrates River was well known throughout Mesopotamia. It would have also been known by the Judean peoples, including the priests and scribes who were writing the Tanakh during the Babylonian Exile of the those peoples, 597 BCE to 538 BCE . Almost 700 years later, the Hebrew Tanakh was adopted by Christianity as the "Old Testament".
Also absent from Egyptian records is any mention of deaths of all first born children in Egypt, something that would have been noted everywhere in Egypt. Nor any mention of sticks turning into snakes. No mention or even evidence of a significant loss of population and the economic impact it would have had, and no mention of the loss of a pharaoh, let alone loss of an army with 500 chariots that would have weakened Egypt militarily for decades to come.
TRUTH is determined by EVIDENCE, not by what anyone says and not by words in an old book. The rules of evidence are this: *If you don't have any...YOU LOSE!*
There are however, unscrupulous people, motivated by religious fervor, that would go so far as to manufacture bogus evidence they hope would support a story they really wish to be true. Such a person was Ron Wyatt, a con man whose only legitimate occupation was as nurse-anesthetist in a hospital in Madison, Tennessee. When he found he could make money 'gaslighting' religious fanatics his financial situation improved immensely. This 'Indiana Jones wannabe' has no archeological qualifications whatsoever, yet has claimed almost 100 Bible-related discoveries. He has been criticized by scientists, historians, biblical scholars, as well as some creationists. He ranks among the great con artists who find fertile ground among people who have a compulsive need to believe.
Now there are many people who have been taught since childhood that the bible is the absolute word of god, that everything in it is the literal truth and if they don't believe it, they will burn in Hell forever and ever, because god loves you. You were told that by the people who raised you, fed you, cared for you and probably loved you. They told you that, because that is what THEIR parents told THEM. THAT is indoctrination.
A belief is an idea that neither seeks nor requires verifiable evidence. Beliefs exist in the human mind. Those who seek answers based on opinions or beliefs are most likely to fall prey to self deception and seek confirmation of their bias. Truth is determined by EVIDENCE, not by what anyone says and not by words in some old book.
FUN FACT. RandallWilks just gave you a dose of evolutionist, pseudo academic flimflam.
REAL FACT: A transitional form struggling to survive over a long period of time with a half formed wing, or partially formed leg would perish in Darwin's struggle for existence over the course of a few generations. We need fully formed species with well adapted organs and habits to survive in earth's ecosystem. Most species are already perfectly adapted to their surroundings and have no need to 'evolve". 2) Evolution supposedly proceeds through genetic innovation, whereby new chromosomal changes take place, to produce a new organ for better survival value. This would involve either an instantaneous transformation or origination of a novel body structure, or as you claim, a slow, gradual process. An instantaneous transformation would involve thousands of genes all changing at once, like a miracle from the Bible, i.e. water turning into wine. I have no problem with that. But if it is the latter, then there would need to be a sequential series of changes all beneficial. Think of the extreme improbability of rolling double sixes just 100 times in a row, then 101 times, 102 times, each time you got it wrong you would have to start all over again, until by some fantastic coincidence (statisticians have proven that it couldn't happen) you made it to 30,000 times in a row. According to some calculations, the probability for this is greater than ten to the eightieth power, which is ten followed by eighty zeroes, which means, according to statistical analysis, that it would never happen. Some have compared this to the entire United States of America being filled with nickels two feet high, and a blind man with a cane walking through and picking up the one nickel with a dab of paint on it.
The estimated time for this to happen would be after the entire galaxy had turned cold and dead. To illustrate this, a cell has at least 30,000 different types of protein molecules that have to be functioning perfectly and in harmony with the rest of the cell for life to function, and they have to be active from the very start. Genes create these proteins. It just takes one gene to be out of order in a cells DNA for any one of literally thousands of fatal diseases to develop. Now let us say for the sake of simplicity that we only have two types of genes that exist, and they have to be in the right order of relationship in two different places of the genetic code. Let us call them 1 and 2. Here are the number of possibilities: 1,1; 1,2; 2,1: 2,2. So we would have one chance in four of obtaining the right sequence for life to exist. Now, lets add just one more number, and one more place to be filled. How many possibilities do we have with three numbers? 1,1,1; 1,1,2; 1,1,3; 1,2,1; 1,2,2; 1,2,3; 1,3,1; 1,3,2; 1,3,3; 2,1,1; 2,1,2; 2,1,3; 2,2,1; 2,2,2; 2,2,3; 2,3,1; 2,3,2; 2,3,3; 3,1,1; 3,1,2; 3,1,3; 3,2,1; 3,2,2; 3,2,3; 3,3,1; 3,3,2; 3,3,3;. In adding just one more unit we go from four possibilities to twenty seven possibilities. How many possibilities do we have if we raise the amount from three to four different types of genes? Two hundred and fifty four possibilities; With five different types of genes we would have one chance in three thousand one hundred and twenty five; For six, one chance in forty six thousand six hundred and fifty six possibilities; Seven, one chance in eight hundred and twenty three thousand five hundred and forty three; Eight, sixteen million seven hundred and seventy seven thousand two hundred and sixteen; Nine, three hundred and eighty seven million, four hundred and twenty thousand four hundred and eighty nine; with ten different types of genes, the chance for them to all be correctly associated in the right order would be one in ten billion. That’s one followed by ten zeroes. For twenty different genes to be in the right order of relationship the possible combinations are greater than one followed by twenty-six zeroes, and we haven’t even begun to approach what the odds are for many thousands of genes to get into the right order by chance for even a minute part of a living cell to function.
Highlighted reply
@jimfoard5671
FUN FACT. RandallWilks just gave you a dose of evolutionist, pseudo academic flimflam.
REAL FACT: A transitional form struggling to survive over a long period of time with a half formed wing, or partially formed leg would perish in Darwin's struggle for existence over the course of a few generations. We need fully formed species with well adapted organs and habits to survive in earth's ecosystem. Most species are already perfectly adapted to their surroundings and have no need to 'evolve". 2) Evolution supposedly proceeds through genetic innovation, whereby new chromosomal changes take place, to produce a new organ for better survival value. This would involve either an instantaneous transformation or origination of a novel body structure, or as you claim, a slow, gradual process. An instantaneous transformation would involve thousands of genes all changing at once, like a miracle from the Bible, i.e. water turning into wine. I have no problem with that. But if it is the latter, then there would need to be a sequential series of changes all beneficial. Think of the extreme improbability of rolling double sixes just 100 times in a row, then 101 times, 102 times, each time you got it wrong you would have to start all over again, until by some fantastic coincidence (statisticians have proven that it couldn't happen) you made it to 30,000 times in a row. According to some calculations, the probability for this is greater than ten to the eightieth power, which is ten followed by eighty zeroes, which means, according to statistical analysis, that it would never happen. Some have compared this to the entire United States of America being filled with nickels two feet high, and a blind man with a cane walking through and picking up the one nickel with a dab of paint on it.
The estimated time for this to happen would be after the entire galaxy had turned cold and dead. To illustrate this, a cell has at least 30,000 different types of protein molecules that have to be functioning perfectly and in harmony with the rest of the cell for life to function, and they have to be active from the very start. Genes create these proteins. It just takes one gene to be out of order in a cells DNA for any one of literally thousands of fatal diseases to develop. Now let us say for the sake of simplicity that we only have two types of genes that exist, and they have to be in the right order of relationship in two different places of the genetic code. Let us call them 1 and 2. Here are the number of possibilities: 1,1; 1,2; 2,1: 2,2. So we would have one chance in four of obtaining the right sequence for life to exist. Now, lets add just one more number, and one more place to be filled. How many possibilities do we have with three numbers? 1,1,1; 1,1,2; 1,1,3; 1,2,1; 1,2,2; 1,2,3; 1,3,1; 1,3,2; 1,3,3; 2,1,1; 2,1,2; 2,1,3; 2,2,1; 2,2,2; 2,2,3; 2,3,1; 2,3,2; 2,3,3; 3,1,1; 3,1,2; 3,1,3; 3,2,1; 3,2,2; 3,2,3; 3,3,1; 3,3,2; 3,3,3;. In adding just one more unit we go from four possibilities to twenty seven possibilities. How many possibilities do we have if we raise the amount from three to four different types of genes? Two hundred and fifty four possibilities; With five different types of genes we would have one chance in three thousand one hundred and twenty five; For six, one chance in forty six thousand six hundred and fifty six possibilities; Seven, one chance in eight hundred and twenty three thousand five hundred and forty three; Eight, sixteen million seven hundred and seventy seven thousand two hundred and sixteen; Nine, three hundred and eighty seven million, four hundred and twenty thousand four hundred and eighty nine; with ten different types of genes, the chance for them to all be correctly associated in the right order would be one in ten billion. That’s one followed by ten zeroes. For twenty different genes to be in the right order of relationship the possible combinations are greater than one followed by twenty-six zeroes, and we haven’t even begun to approach what the odds are for many thousands of genes to get into the right order by chance for even a minute part of a living cell to function.
2:10 such a gross sight im sorry
Lmao
Felt like watching a fever dream
M O N K E T I T I E S
WTF are you talking about those are sweet
Fuck me this is gonna waste my time
Elephant - a giant majestic untamed wild beast with unmatched brute force
Monke man - haha pointy stick goes *brrrrrr*
Mammoth*
@@T.E.Cdocmain if you talking about the elephant's ancestor in the video ..
It's not mammoth
It looked more like deinotherium bruh 😂
Lmao, this is good.
The entire animal kingdom : look at that weak ass Ape.
Early Humans : pickup stones and sharp sticks
Animals : Why do we hear boss music.
🤣🤣🤣 Nice
Animals: Understandable have a nice d.. aaaarghhh 🤕
e
Humans are animals dumbshit
I now believe that my dad did in fact crossed jungles and saharas just to go to school. I'm honestly suprised to see him here
4:22 when your tripping on acid and your friends ditch you
😂😂😂
Alright chill out Katie it's not that funny
pug face 🥺
pug face don’t make a joke if you don’t like the reaction dumbass
@@dippidousfippidous4837 that was the whole point of that comment it was a joke you unobservant little shit
- 2.5 million years ago: Let's explore the world! There are so many things to see, and my descendants will be able to know all of it. So interesting!
- Nowadays: Dancing on TikTok and watching social media the entire day.
Today we have Google and youtube to explore the world.
All respect to the guy who travel all that time to record this
😂
Its a lie this thing was made by someone to influence us with fake or wrong information
This joke existed back then too.
Joke
This is joke
Are you kiding me
Human came from adam
Q: Why did the creatard jump off the building?
A: He thought gravity was "just a theory"
Q: Why do creatards pretend that evolution means we came from rocks?
A: Because they themselves made it no further than brainless rocks.
Q: Why do creatards so badly want to believe they’re intelligently designed?
A: When else do they get the chance to say “intelligent” while describing themselves?
It’s crazy cause humans are intelligent but that doesn’t necessarily mean out cause is
Ad hominems are so effective nice argument!
whats a creatard
You know what makes me want to scream about this?
THE APES NIPPLES
I CANT RN-
Grow up
@@bangman7133 Do you know how old i am-?
😂😂😂
@@nbie8969 i wanna know :c
@@nbie8969 he said grow up not your 12
When people name normal animals: fish, giraffe, ant, dog
When people name instinct animals: DEINONYCBUS, MUTTABURRASAURUS, TANYSTROPBEUS, SBONISAURUS!
Instinct animals? What are they? FYI all animals have a Latin name, thats what those more complicated words are.
Extinct animal*
Homo sapien
We still have those names for real life.
Dogs are canines. People are Homo sapiens. Cats are felines. The examples you said are their scientific name, as in their Latin name. Fish, cat, etc, are all the common word for an animal that may fit the general idea of what a cat is, for example.
@@juliannolastname2442 exactly. It's the same with plants. So a Japanese maple tree, we all know what they are, but the Latin word for a specific one is called Acer Palmatum Disectum, and you can add to that Purpurium. Those words aren't just horseshit for the sake of horseshit, they describe precisely, the exact features of the tree. Latin is a world wide universal language that anyone can understand.
Thanks for the camera man for staying their for a million years
😁
What a living legend
Wrong there
Couldn't even spell your copied comment correctly
*SOME PEOPLE STILL ASK, "WHY ARE THERE STILL APES (OR MONKEYS)?"*
It should be obvious that such people, usually creationists, lack an understanding of what evolution is and how it works. Apparently someone told such people that humans evolved from apes, and from that, due to their lack of education, they assumed that all apes were supposed to evolve into humans. That is not how evolution works, but creationists have no interest in learning anything other than creation mythology.
They might just as well have asked "If dogs are descended from wolves, why are there still wolves?" Or even "If Americans came from Europe, why are there still Europeans?" Just as dogs descended from a population of wolves, so too did humans evolve from one particular population of apes.
What we know is that the first apes evolved in Africa about 25 million years ago. from a population of Cercopiths. Whereas monkeys run on all four feet across the TOPS of branches, apes evolved skeletal changes ability to swing, arm over arm, from branch to branch. Evolution works to make each species best suited to their environment. For apes, that environment was the forest and they are well suited for it. At one time there were about 30 different species of apes in those forests.
Had environmental conditions remained the same, we would still see forests covering the whole African continent. However, conditions did not stay the same; the climate became drier. As a result, forested areas shrank in size and were replaced by grasslands, the African savanna, with just a few scattered trees. The shrinking forests put different ape species in competition with each other and many went extinct.
Then, about 6 or 7 million years ago, one population of apes split, with some of them opting for life on that open savanna. Other apes are capable of walking upright, they are just not comfortable doing so for long periods of time. Recent experiments with trained chimps on a treadmill have shown that for them, walking upright was more efficient in terms of energy expended than quadrupedal walking. Chimps and other apes though must shift their weight from side to side while walking bipedaly.
That savanna environment favored skeletal changes that placed the knees directly under the center of gravity. By about 4 mya, our ancestral australopithecines had almost the same skeletal features as modern humans. Changes to pelvis, femur, knees and feet gave them a smooth stride that was efficient for long distance travel. They did however, retain long arms and curved fingers enabling them to climb a tree when danger threatened. Their brains, as measured by cranial capacity, were
The apes that remained in a forest environment were under little pressure to change as they were well adapted to it. They became the ancestors of today's chimps and bonobos. Those living on the open savanna were presented challenges not experienced by woodland apes, and that required greater intelligence and cooperation to overcome them. It set their descendants on a different evolutionary trajectory that culminated in us.
We ran after elephants while naked until at least 28,000 years ago, where have the good times gone...
We've lost a lot of strength sadly but at least we've gained a lot of brain power to know to never do that again.
When we decided to run after naked women rather than elephants.
@@TheGuitarReb This is a new low for humanity
@@AdoptedPoo I don't know. i never tried to hump an Elephant
*v i d e o g a m e s*
Evolution, in all of its forms, is one of the most important things anyone can learn. By the way - great animation!
@@VincentGill3 nonsensical? There's tons of evidence for that.
Sorry but your verses don't mention what you said either, that's what you think the verses mean.
@@slingslang2934 The link to the Annunaki gods creation story suggests that there was an intervention about 400 thousand years ago in the Garden of Eden (Iraq - Syria).
@@VincentGill3 says evolution is nonsensical, goes on about some gods primitive man imagined up.. put the drugs down and unsubscribe to one of mankind's oldest circulating comic book.
Endogenous retroviruses. Understand what they are and how they work. Then understand we have some that are 10's of millions of years old embedded in our dna. If evolution is correct, then we should expect multiple species affected by the virus traced back to a common ancestor originally affected that passed it down to its offspring, and that offspring passed it to its offspring down the line of evolution. Guess what....it's a fact.
No God or gods needed.
@@slingslang2934 There is evidence on both sides. Which side is more empowering?
@@TwistedElbow24 The debate between evolution and creation is not settled. The historical evidence I have gathered shows that we evolved and were created.
Whatever the temporary conclusions of this long standing debate
I choose the information that empowers me!
Damn Man.. It's even more creepy to watch when you're high on dope 😳 💀😧
Same dog I’m high while watching this rn
Even scarier to think about on mushrooms lol
I'm faded lmao
Same dawg
Lol i wonder how that feels like
The cameraman is a legend
🤣🤣
😂😂😂😂😂
2:15 i feel uncomfortable
Lil Hoss I’m wheezing 😂🤣
Lmaoo
Why?
@@SofiaBerruxSubs *c h e s t*
@MOLLY VIBE There are lots of documentaries on this. They don't need to. They are comfortable in their environment. And how do you know they haven't evolved already and won't look more like us in a few million years??
Brilliant animation and hugely informative. Many thanks!
Many lies and unproven links
We came from heaven and not apes
We always were humans, but not as smart as us now
@@midloran bible is shite
@@YaMomsOyster god is not real
our ancestors walked so that we could run. LITERALLY.
These are all assumptions and bullshit fairytale stories.. God created us
@@curiousgeorge6921 yeah sure god created us, i bet he likes creating ugly play toys and forcing them to praise him and if not fucking kill them with flood or fire balls.
Fucking stupid
@Juicebox Industries i bet he loves people like you
@@curiousgeorge6921 The Bible is a bull shit fairytale. Not evolution.
@@curiousgeorge6921 so magic and Jesus bringing the dead back to life and a talking snake deceive Eve to eat the fruit doesn't sound Like a fairly tale to you?
Lmao. Those assumption has a supporting evidence that those species of apes exist and in the meantime you will denie it to further feed your ego.
“Comes back to check the comment section after a while”
*yep, still triggered creationists as far as the eye can see*
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Life is nothing but struggle. So, let us enjoy our existance.
There's a saying that existence is resistance.
@Konstantin Simic আসমান থেকে asteroid, air, some elements ছাড়া কোনও উপকারী বস্তূ পৃথিবীতে এসেছে না আসবে? আমরা যা কিছু অর্জন করেছি সব নিজেদের পরিশ্রমের ফসল। অযথা মানুষ ব্যতিত অন্য কিছুকে কৃতিত্ব দেব না। কল্পিত গল্প বলে বলে পয়সা রোজগার বন্ধ করতে হবে।
@@tokresali ভাইজান হ্যাঁ আমরা পরিশ্রম করেছি কিন্তু ফলাফল আমাদের অজানা ছিল। এতো ইভোল্যুশন এর কিছুই আমাদের পূর্বপরিকল্পিত ছিল না বরং আমরা প্রাকৃতিক শক্তির দ্বারা প্রবাহিত হচ্ছিলাম, সবকিছুই আগত পরিস্থিতির সাথে এডাবস্টেশন ছিল, আমরা ফলাফল নিয়ে অবগত ছিলাম না as if we are living in a some kind simulation, just another pawn in a chess code. এইভাবে আমি কিছুটা সৃষ্টিকর্তার glimpse পাচ্ছি ।
@@ronniebain9776 কার্যকারনের সাথে সংগতি রেখে সিদ্ধান্ত নিতে হবে। ফলাফল জানা থাকা না থাকার সাথে মূল্যায়ন নির্ভরশীল না। পরিশ্রম না করলে কেউ কিছু দেবে না, এটাই সত্য । অযথা অন্য কাউকে কৃতিত্ব দেব কেন? অযথা কোনও কিছুর গন্ধ পেয়ে মানুষকে ভয় দেখিয়ে ঠকানো উচিত নয়। আপনি ভয় পান, ঠিক আছে, সাধারন মানুষকে ভয় দেখিয়ে সুবিধা নেওয়া অনৈতিক।
@Konstantin Simic thanks. I was curious about what dimwits thought about this. You cleared that right up.
The most incredible thing about this is that these hominin creatures lived millions of years ago to eventually give rise to more intelligent creatures, capable of recreating their long forgotten boob physics when swinging from trees. Remarkable.
Underrated
@@AmanExplorerBoy agreed
The most incredible think is that some pple can take fantasy as reality.
If we evolved from monkeys then why are mokeys turning into humans today, the world has forgit its creator WHICH IS GOD THE ALMIGHTY 👑✝️!
@@mycolemae we evolved from apes not monkeys monkeys are primates with tails apes dont have them gorillas chimpanzees bonobos humans and more are apes but we didnt come from any of these apes but we all share a common ancestor 1 ape turned into humans gorillas and more apes thats how theres multiple apes lol god doesnt exist
I m thankful for becoming part of this evolution 🧬🧬
Your source trust me bro
@@Mojojojo335 chimps are our close relatives 🐒
@@SMCGPRA Ehh
@@Mojojojo335you're already too comfortable in your fake fairy tale
source: bro just trust me (gives banana)