For whom complaining about the interior designs and ... the wipers... here is some information you may be interested: This airplane is Airbus A319, which had been designed in 1984 and debuted in 1987. It has the first ever fly-by-wire system powered by 6 Motorola 6502 CPUs. It has 6 colored CRT screens to display all the flight information. Because of the fly-by-wire and sidestick design, the flight deck and seats are very comfortable. It even has a tray table so the crew can enjoy their meals. Also, the cockpit is large enough to carry crew's 20 luggages, and tons of documents, and all those emergency equipments. Pilots can even fullly stand up in the cockpit to stretch their back and legs... Even in today, this flight deck is still one of the most comfortable flight decks comparing to other similar aircraft. Most classic cars even Mercedes at that era couldnt reach the same comfort level. Also aircraft last very long due to their carefully design and strictly test. A new design can take years to get certificates for entering commercial operation. And the wipers, yes, they don't work as good as in cars, but they have their strength in their motors and connections. They are not synchronous and work independently if one doesn't work, another will not be affected.
Correction Airbus a319 is first western-made aircraft to have fly-by-wire sustems. The first ever was soviet an124. The equivalent of fly-by-wiee in this aircraft was in use at least 10 years before similar system was claimed to be invented and developed by airbus 😊
@@thardyryll not that I'm aware of. But they were the first to send a capsule to space, live animal (and got it back alive) and a human as well :) We all think they were technological primitives, but if you look closer they weren't
One of the most beautiful and dangerous airports on the planet ...the entire flight itself is a tourist package and worths the visit let alone touring around Bhutan ❤
That was bad ass! Would love the opportunity to fly interesting approaches like that. This video also reminded me why I almost never use the wipers. They are even more annoying in person.
My heart did not stop. But I do admire the pilot's skill and ability to navigate the approach and land the aircraft safely. Probably wasn't his first time.
What a superb approach. Bang on the glide slope all the way down. That would take some practice to get right, as the AC is only around 200ft up at the moment it finally lines up. They hit the 1000' runway markers right on. Great flying. Really enjoyed that.
I love that in 2024, with all the technology we have, our best solution for rain on a windshield is still just wiping it off really quickly over and over
What is the problem with the wipers ? They are just design to do what needed. And be sure they are stronger and more efficient than yours on your cars !!!
@@athgt6630 The slow approach speed of this aircraft is in excess of the top speed of any normal road car. The wipers are rated for much higher airspeeds than on a road car but you are too dunce to realise that . . .
Please stop using titles like 'heart stopping'......it was a very well executed standard approach in slightly wet weather! Admittedly a challenging approach a bit out of the ordinary compared to many airports, but well within limits and very professionally and calmly flown. Nicely filmed; thank you, but really not ' heart stopping'!!! You don't need to upsell your video by adding misleading titles.
dont need to. They clear the area in front of the pilots. If they spend more time outside the direct vision, they spend less time where they are needed most.
Superb approach and landing...but to be honest the video is a bit sped up right before the landing and then slowed down. Bullshit tactics being used for clicks.
Greatly exaggerated. Not heart stopping at all. This is a VFR (Visual Flight Rules / References) approach. The ground is visible and plenty forward visibility through the whole video.
@@user-qb7dr1qo2t Never flew a MSFS, because I have owned my own aircraft since the 70s. I have been a commercial pilot since 1970. And a flight engineer on Air Force C-130s. I flew many part 135 and corporate flights. Even though I have sold my last aircraft I still have access to it for just the fuel I use. That’s how I know this title is greatly exaggerated, and this is a VFR approach. How much real flight experience do you have?
Paro is the most dangerous approach in the world. Less than 24 pilots are certified to land there. Go ahead, write a novel all about how much flight experience you have, blah blah blah. This approach will make any pilot pucker a little bit, no matter how many times you do it.
Gonna scratch the MF hell out of the windshield using wipers on dry glass. Especially when using them during portions of flight they aren’t even needed.
@@benbauer882 Actually since the inception of both Boeing and Airbus, Boeing with a much longer history, is still much safer. But there are also some Boeing’s that I would never fly on.
![HIWWHEE | OHM [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/OJJLtTLqLag/mqdefault.jpg)
Those wipers sure are doing their best to keep the plane airborne.
You mean auxiliary flaps?
They're flapping the main wings.
I was going to say the same thing.
I'm amazed at those speeds they aren't flying off
Flawless speed and descent control, nailed it on the landing markers.
There were 3 flawss
touched down late actually but inconsequential. the approach itself was smooth
Not heart stopping.. But a good approach and safe landing.
For whom complaining about the interior designs and ... the wipers... here is some information you may be interested: This airplane is Airbus A319, which had been designed in 1984 and debuted in 1987. It has the first ever fly-by-wire system powered by 6 Motorola 6502 CPUs. It has 6 colored CRT screens to display all the flight information. Because of the fly-by-wire and sidestick design, the flight deck and seats are very comfortable. It even has a tray table so the crew can enjoy their meals. Also, the cockpit is large enough to carry crew's 20 luggages, and tons of documents, and all those emergency equipments. Pilots can even fullly stand up in the cockpit to stretch their back and legs... Even in today, this flight deck is still one of the most comfortable flight decks comparing to other similar aircraft. Most classic cars even Mercedes at that era couldnt reach the same comfort level. Also aircraft last very long due to their carefully design and strictly test. A new design can take years to get certificates for entering commercial operation. And the wipers, yes, they don't work as good as in cars, but they have their strength in their motors and connections. They are not synchronous and work independently if one doesn't work, another will not be affected.
Correction
Airbus a319 is first western-made aircraft to have fly-by-wire sustems. The first ever was soviet an124. The equivalent of fly-by-wiee in this aircraft was in use at least 10 years before similar system was claimed to be invented and developed by airbus 😊
@@pandamishaDidn’t the Soviets invent the first car, bicycle, motorcycle, toothbrush and flush toilet, too?
@@thardyryll not that I'm aware of. But they were the first to send a capsule to space, live animal (and got it back alive) and a human as well :)
We all think they were technological primitives, but if you look closer they weren't
Concorde was the first passenger aircraft to use a fly-by-wire flight-control system.
@@thardyryll
The wipers did a great job landing the plane.
Auto land wipers
@@andrewstorm8240Model T wipers seem more functional.
- "This looks like good spot for helicopter pad."
- "Helicopter pad? We're building a runway, lad!"
One of the most beautiful and dangerous airports on the planet ...the entire flight itself is a tourist package and worths the visit let alone touring around Bhutan ❤
Those wipers made me think I was flying in a locust.
He made it look so flawlessly easy.
That was bad ass! Would love the opportunity to fly interesting approaches like that. This video also reminded me why I almost never use the wipers. They are even more annoying in person.
Holy hell. That's some skill right there. I don't even think I could pull that off in a flight sim.
super pilots! .....wonderful landscape..
how do you know?
@@credera how do you know what? Paro is the most difficult apporoach in the world, that's how
Insane approach!!! Wow !
It's almost as if the designers of the airport said 'Where can we put this to test pilots to their limits?'
I believe the F-111's I worked on in the USAF had a bleed air system for the windscreen, and the cockpit switch was labeled "Rain Removal".
My heart did not stop. But I do admire the pilot's skill and ability to navigate the approach and land the aircraft safely. Probably wasn't his first time.
That’s almost fighter pilot flying. Great vid. 👍
How about we all agree that it’s a super tricky approach that definitely has the potential to be heart stopping!
The pilot earned his wages on that landing!
What a superb approach.
Bang on the glide slope all the way down.
That would take some practice to get right, as the AC is only around 200ft up at the moment it finally lines up.
They hit the 1000' runway markers right on. Great flying.
Really enjoyed that.
it's an RNP approach. There is no glide slope.
@@lostmoon77not an RNP either this is visual
These pilots are crazy - also very good, but crazy.
Excellent landing tight strip
Great skills
Superbly executed very nicely done….
Silky smoove
Did you ever see such anemic windshield wipers?
Ha-Ha!! Must be aftermarket additions!! ✈️
Hmmm, yeah. I placed a little bit too much trust in a fart the other night, and managed to move more fluid than those wipers 😳😁
That flapping is what kept the plane flying
Always thrilling to wat the landings at Paro.
Awesome. That's some boss sh*t right there.
I love that in 2024, with all the technology we have, our best solution for rain on a windshield is still just wiping it off really quickly over and over
The joke wipers, I cant 🤣
The pilots did a great job, but at 2:40 the airplane started insulting them.
Airbus airplanes are famous for insulting pilots. The next generation will also insult passengers.
😃 😃 😃
Sticked the landing 👌
tHaT sUrE wAs HeArT sToPpInG
Nice approach.
this why 2 people have to be in control, the one flying and the other reseting the aircraft after landing, leave it the way you found it !
Прикольно, хотел туда слетать, но билеты из Дели и обратно $800 стоят, это очень дорого за пару двухчасовых перелётов
Is this an old Airbus A319?
Wipers look like my ILS needles. 😢
Mine when i do the loc bc
Noisy wipers!
Wipers are the new wings hahahahahaha
$3,758,939 plane with manual wipers
What is the problem with the wipers ? They are just design to do what needed. And be sure they are stronger and more efficient than yours on your cars !!!
They really are not.
@@alangordon3283 You are probably a specialist !
cool refresh rate
I wonder if it would keep flying on one window wiper.
Airplanes, what a wonderful and complex machines... I Hate them! XD
Pull over and let me out please.
😃 😃 😃
Why is this heart-stopping?
Heart-stopping???
I wonder how a 1 engine out escape route would look like!
👏👏👏
I think those wipers should be improved..
Those wipers are a little difficult to turn on and off. and distracting. If they had good displays then a camera might be more elegant
Wow it was good
2:40 :(
But they didn't perform the Bank Angle Check!
voepass pilots flying this approach: uhm... best we can do is fall out of the sky
Get Hubnut to evacuate those wipers 😬
First evaluate, then evacuate😂
thats definitely turboprob territory - jets would be a handful
Um, the A319 is a jet.
majority of the aircraft operating here are 319s.
@@sangaytenzinPhysics101 jets would be a handful to fly in there!
@@bobmearns9774 turbo prop territory - jets would be a lot harder
I've done that approach and landing a dozen times in FSX; it's not hard.
FSX is child's play
Why are all the screens flashing?
camera shutter speed and screen refresh rate shenanigans. in reality they're not flickering, it's caused by the camera recording it
@@esscee96 ty!
million $ aircraft, 2cent wipers
What do you expect at this speed?
@@pioner4692some better shit. Have you been on a Mercedes?
@@athgt6630 The slow approach speed of this aircraft is in excess of the top speed of any normal road car. The wipers are rated for much higher airspeeds than on a road car but you are too dunce to realise that . . .
@@TRPGpilot evidently you have no fucking clue what the wipers of a Mercedes can do at 250kmh, just like the approach speed of that plane.
@@athgt6630 never been on one but have been in one
Please stop using titles like 'heart stopping'......it was a very well executed standard approach in slightly wet weather! Admittedly a challenging approach a bit out of the ordinary compared to many airports, but well within limits and very professionally and calmly flown.
Nicely filmed; thank you, but really not ' heart stopping'!!! You don't need to upsell your video by adding misleading titles.
Pujurul imnnisirul ghonkhar hantsimirin khangminiraniminidah!
Why are tye wipers not reaching the center and why do they look like sticks😂😂
dont need to. They clear the area in front of the pilots. If they spend more time outside the direct vision, they spend less time where they are needed most.
15 approach💀👌
Meh, it's their version of the River Visual 19 into DCA :)
The effort time and cost that go into a aircraft,,then they get del boy to design the wipers.
Why are the screens flickering so much?
They aren’t. That’s an effect only visible on the video. Basically an interference between the screen refresh rate and the camera framerate
Huh... Is this the mini Kai Tak airport?
@slavecoder9928 Worse...
Not heart stopping
Sod that, nope!
Those are the suckiest wipers I've ever seen.
Superb approach and landing...but to be honest the video is a bit sped up right before the landing and then slowed down. Bullshit tactics being used for clicks.
300 ft wing level criteria is not suitable in this approach
Greatly exaggerated. Not heart stopping at all. This is a VFR (Visual Flight Rules / References) approach. The ground is visible and plenty forward visibility through the whole video.
spoken like a true MSFS 2020 simmmer .
I shat my pant whilst watching this, when they stopped I thought it was a fart but it was a shard. Twice I shit my pants in the span of this video.
@@user-qb7dr1qo2t Never flew a MSFS, because I have owned my own aircraft since the 70s. I have been a commercial pilot since 1970. And a flight engineer on Air Force C-130s. I flew many part 135 and corporate flights. Even though I have sold my last aircraft I still have access to it for just the fuel I use. That’s how I know this title is greatly exaggerated, and this is a VFR approach. How much real flight experience do you have?
Paro is the most dangerous approach in the world. Less than 24 pilots are certified to land there. Go ahead, write a novel all about how much flight experience you have, blah blah blah.
This approach will make any pilot pucker a little bit, no matter how many times you do it.
You couldn’t do it mate
Must be a Boing!
Gonna scratch the MF hell out of the windshield using wipers on dry glass. Especially when using them during portions of flight they aren’t even needed.
very poor wipers
What do you expect them to use? Toilet papers?
@@Vico649toilet brushes
Those wipers are the only thing creating lift!
Habe you tried wiping with 300 kmh wind in your face?
Doesn’t look heart-stopping. Clickbait
Regardless of how well the cockpit is designed, I will never fly on any Airbus aircraft.
Nobody cares . . .
No problem, you can always take a Boeing, it's surely much safer, right?
@@benbauer882 Actually since the inception of both Boeing and Airbus, Boeing with a much longer history, is still much safer. But there are also some Boeing’s that I would never fly on.
cool video but the airport is outdated in the video! time to upload a newer video of paro! lol
Sir may I know if it is an old video, or the parallel taxiway is demolished recently?
Yes it's an old video. Parallel taxiway was built later.