th-cam.com/video/42DfGkJYEdc/w-d-xo.htmlsi=OPy1bH_SQ8ytDOF2 If you enjoyed this video then Please help me go and watch this full video i am deleting all the videos from this channel soon
I find it quite strange to show the different types of Christianity but showing Islam at the same time as a homogeneous religion, which at all isn’t the case. Would be interesting to see which Sects of Islam were prevalent at different times.
@@shoraidgaming4554 nowadays maybe yes but historically no. Would u consider Arianism as major sect in Christianity today. Saying that there are only two major sects and that in Europe they’re alle Sunni just shows that u are not well informed in that topic. Even in Albania there are Bektashi Muslims which you could consider Shia. There are many different subgroups but it just would be nice to see at least the big three (Sunni, Shia, Ibadi) espacially considering the changes in dynasties throughout the Middle East and Muslim Spain. I mean if a region changed from Orthodxy to Catholicism he also showed it. In the way he has done it seems like Islam is just on big homogeneous blop which it might be to you but from a scholarly perspective it’s not
There are lots of atheists there it's just that they tend to be concentrated in cities so they look less numerous on the map. The video isn't entirely accurate either imo. Certain large metropolitan areas like Paris, London, Madrid and Milan should definitely have some irreligion in there, moreover some considerable chunks of Russia (especially in the northwest region).
The pre-Islamic Mesopotamia professed Nestorian Christianity, which was a subspecies of Nicene Christianity that had disputes with the Roman emperors-Chalcedonian. Nestorianism was a separate Christian formation supported by Zoroastrian rulers of Sassanid Iran
@@hatim1.0 There were many religions in pre-Islamic Arabia, and we know that in the kingdom of Himyarite in present-day Yemen before the Sassanids conquered Yemen and made it their province, Judaism was practiced in Himyar for a long time
@@hatim1.0 In addition to Arab polytheism, various varieties of Christianity and, to a lesser extent, Zoroastrianism were widespread in pre-Islamic Arabia, although the Arabs were never adherents of Zoroastrianism
@@hatim1.0 The Arab kingdoms of the Lakhmids (most of the time vassals of the Sassanids) and the Ghassanids (vassals of Eastern Rome) practiced Monophysitism with an admixture of local beliefs. The Lakhmids were also more influenced by Zoroastrian practices than any other Arabs, given their subordinate status in relation to the Iranian Sassanids
England adopted Cristianity during the Roman times, but with the anglo-saxon invasion they became pagans. Then, they adopted Catholicism. Anglo-Saxons never adopted Celtic Church
@@wegfarir1963 Northumbrians briefly used the Celtic dating system for Easter if I remember correctly, but other than that, the Saxons were Catholic, starting with Augustine in Kent. TBF the "Celtic Church" isnt really a clearly defined thing in the same way as Catholics and Orthadox. Northumbrians switch at the Synod of Whitby in 664. That said, the original comment was right, as far as Historians are concerned, Christanity was probably almost entirely wiped out in England during the Saxon invasions (or at least, there is very little archeological evidence for its survival).
@@repippeas I thought the Celtic Church was only a form of catholicism that developed in Great-Britain and Ireland and the Roman Church was alright with it, because the celtic saints are still official, like Saint Patrick. When I read about it, the Celtic Church was called "Celtic Branch of the Catholic Church" and many celtic bishops got along with roman bishops
Catholic saints who were given visions of the future by God say that there’s supposed to be a chastisement, followed by a short golden age, then comes the Anti-Christ. During the chastisement, Islam will take over parts of Europe but only for a very short time. During the short golden age, Europe will be ruled by a French Catholic Monarch who will restore Christianity in Europe. Many countries will convert to Christianity, even China.
WW3 is said to be apart of the chastisement. Many prophets have had the same vision of Russia invading Europe all the way the the Rhine. But then the Russians are pushed back and defeated. Many miracles will take place. Also the monarchies will return.
1) The conversion to Islam is too fast here, it took a long time for the Levant and Mesopotamia to fully convert. In some places like northern Mesopotamia the Christian Assyrian majority hold out for a long time. 2) What is that large Zoroastrian pocket in western Iran that survives till 1919? Such a thing didn't exist, Zoroastrians were already a small minority by the beginning of 1800s and were mostly in central Iran like Yazd and Kerman. 3) Slavs didn't went that deep into Russia in ancient times, even in early middle ages large parts of European Russia was Uralic. 4) Hungarian paganism is missing, the Hungarians were pagan for significant amount of time after they settled in the Carpathian basin.
Also the author completely disregarded Eastern European state of Volga Bulgaria (ancestors of modern Tatar and Chuvash) which started to become Muslim in VII-VIII centuries and finally adopted it as state religion in 922.
@@anthrosapien3784 Most of these events make no sense considering modern politics. Like Italy turning "fascist" and so Muslim groups take over Sicily and start committing genocide there, and they succeed in doing so. Something like this would never have a chance of happening and succeeding in today's world.
@@14Misantrop88 yeah, in "todays" world you are assuming that conditions do not deteriorate as a result of collapsing birth rates and climate change and environmental issues in the future
There are almost no Buddhists in the Caucasus, the Lower Volga Region and the Northern Black Sea region, only Orthodox. I've been there many times and I know many people from there, so I've seen it for myself. The only region with Buddhism here is Kalmykia, but otherwise only Orthodox, so the number of Buddhists on the map is nonsense.
@@mrobocop1666 No, there are almost none in the Lower Volga region. There are in the Middle Volga region, in Tatarstan and Bashkiria, but Muslims are almost not found outside their borders. I was there and I can honestly say.
I just noticed that Lake Balaton disappeared in 1037 AD Great video btw, really informative, and it was fun to watch the outlines of empires modify the distribution of religions
Of course people would be mad about the future of Europe section, its straight up alternate history not projections and arguably less plausible alternate history given it isn't even based on the projections after a few decades.
Славянская Аркона, которая была на территории Германии, нервно курит в сторонке... а Германцев в Европу загнали Гунны с Антами... они не всегда там жили.
По поводу буддизма, я не согласен. Сам живу на Кубани. Эта одна из самых православных территорий России. Никаких признаков развития буддизма не наблюдал. Я больше поверю в распространение ислама, чем буддизма. Так что автор, ты не прав
Мусульмане могут просто перерезать и поработить все местное население и заселить эту землю мусульманами. От буддизма таких приколов вряд ли можно ожидать
Lower strata of Polish people was slow to adopt Christianity and the process of christianization lasted for centuries. It is agreed by historians that this process ended by the 16th century. Meaning that from 16th century onwards all Polish peasants were Christian in name, even if their understanding of the new religion was minimal. Many peasants continued to practice some of the Pagan practises well into 19th century, with some historians making claims even about early 20th century. These practises beget Folk Catholicism, that is a hybrid of Catholic and Pagan customs. In addition to that mainstraim Catholicism in Poland incorporated some Pagan traditions and cultivates them to this day. In more remote areas of Poland Paganism was still practiced even in 15th century as exemplified by contemporary chronicles, such as "Postylla Łukasza z Wielkiego Koźmina" from 1405-1412, or Annales seu cronicae incliti Regni Poloniae of Jan Długosz from 1455-1480.
I bet this comment section will be completely and totally peaceful and respectful when discussing the future of Europe :) What videos would you guys like to see me make next?
Dude... you know that Islam is a religion, right... I know that you Europeans are paranoid about birth rates of sons of Muslim immigrants but... have you ever thought about the possibility of native Europeans converting to Islam ??? Islam is a religion... not a race... your own ancestors were once pagans who converted to Christianity...
Wrong, georgia 🇬🇪 was one of the first countries ever to accept Christianity, georgia accepted Christianity in 4th century after the Saint Nino spread Christianity in Kingdom of Iberia, aka georgia.
Few issues with this: You put slavic paganism on the map way before slavs even were in Europe, Slavs started settling Eastern and Central Europe in 5th and 6th century CE, you had them settled there since 6th century BCE, also you ignored the fact that what is current day eastern part of Germany was settled by Slavs as well in early medieval period, in general, you ignored the entire Migration Period You also didn't account for the christinization of Great Moravia You also marked the lands of modern day Hungary as always being part of slavic paganism, ignoring the fact that the people who settled there, first the Avars and later early Hungarians, practiced their own form of paganism, before the Hungarians adopted Christianity Also, you split Christianity into Catholic and Orthodox before the Great Schism of 1054 And final note, you can't really call this video a "history" if you also include speculative development, what are you basing this prediction on? You didn't cite anything that would support your claims
Slavic paganism may have well been there before 6th century BCE. There are two contradicting school of thought on the matter. The one you are reffering to, the migrationist. And allochtonic, which sees Slavs as inhabiting Central and Eastern Europe since only Indo-Europeans spread over Europe for the first time. The migrationist one is often dubbed the German interpretation, because it derives from Prussian times of 19th century attempts of germanization of the Prussian partition of Poland, where German intelectuals seeking to diminish Slavs, while lead by the wave of German romanticism and chauvinism declared Slavs to be incapable of creating any advanced culture and to undermine Slavic presence in Central and Eastern Europe stated that people who lived there between 8th century BCE and 7th century CE couldn't have been Slavic, and have to be Germanic instead. They needed that to justify their claim to the lands of Central and Eastern Europe and to boost their sense of supposed superiority. The theory howerer, is not proven and is of rather dubious nature. Why all other Indo-European people were present in Europe before 8th century BCE in their respective lands, but just Slavs supposedly were not? Considering from whom this claim comes from it is not to be trusted.
@@Dux-ex-Tenebris The Migration Period is a widely accepted event that took place about 300 - 600 CE and included way more groups of people than Slavs, like Franks, Goths, Huns, Avars, Magyars and many other, it's possible the original proposal of this event might have had more than dubious reasoning behind it, but since then studies of this period have changed and developed I couldn't find what allochtonic is, I've only found what allochronic is, so I assume it's a typo, Johannes Fabian proposed this discourse in the 80's and it was a way to criticize the Eurocentricity of anthropology at the time, that too many researchers act like the contemporary subjects they study exist in a different time, thus making them look more static and primitive than actually living and currently existing cultures, I couldn't find anything to directly connect this discourse to the Migration Period, it's just a perspective researcher can adopt while studying contemporary cultures, and since it was proposed over 40 years ago I assume it's something widely accepted by the anthropologists of today
@@Bohous156 Firstly, I am sorry for the confusion with terms. Instead of "allochtonic" in my first paragraph I should have written "autochthonic". This is the theory of Slavs inhabiting Europe since BCE. The migrationist and still more commonly accepted theory is called "allochtonic". It is not a typo. To find more about it try some uncensored search engine like DuckDuckGo, and then type for instance "slavic migration allochtonic" - it should yield some results. The proven migration you mention (300-700CE) is about Slavs dispersing from their original abode in approximately modern Belarus (although they may well have inhabited modern day Poland as well) to conquer majority of Central, Eastern, and South-Eastern Europe. You wrote at the beginning that Slavs were not even in Europe, and that is false, as they were settling modern day Belarus at the very least. The theory I wrote about is not even about this time period, but about ages BCE. To give you a better imagination of the idea in another comment I will copy an introduction from genetic research paper from 2013 titled "The History of Slavs Inferred from Complete Mitochondrial Genome Sequences". You can find it on NIH, that is on the US National Institutes of Health in their National Library of Medicine. It's an official governmental website.
@@Bohous156 "The Slavs are the most numerous population of Central and Eastern Europe. Nowadays, about 268 million people inhabiting well over half of Europe speak thirteen languages (and their dialects) belonging to the Slavic language group [1]. First remarks about Slavic populations can be found in the written sources of East Roman and Byzantine authors, dated around 550 AD. Although these reports characterized Slavic tribes that had lived at that time, the antecedent history of that ethnic groups remained unrevealed. Therefore, the issue of the earliest location of Slavs has been deliberated over the past century from the historical, archaeological, ethnographic and linguistic viewpoint (e.g. [1]-[5].) Although the ongoing discussion in these fields unanimously indicates their common origin, the results of various studies indicate different time and place of their formation. A number of alternative “homelands” of the Slavs have been suggested thus far (reviewed briefly in [1]). Many hypotheses have been proposed to explain the origin of Slavs, but the most widely discussed are “autochthonous” and “allochthonous” (migrationist) theories [6]. The “autochthonous” conception points to the continuity of cultural development of the Central Europe (the area between the Oder and Vistula rivers) from the Bronze Age until the historical appearance of the Slavs in the early Middle Ages. According to this hypothesis, the Bronze and Iron Age Lusatian culture of the area between the Oder and Vistula is considered as Proto-Slavic and subsequent Zarubinets-Przeworsk cultures (200 BC -200 AD) are included in the putative Slavic “homeland” [7], [8]. From the very beginning, this hypothesis has been challenged by some German archeologists who claim that the Przeworsk region was more arguably within an early Germanic-speaking territory [2]. Alternatively, the “allochthonous” (migrationist) assumption tracks the earliest Slavic territory to the area stretching from Carpathian foothills to the Pripet and the left bank of the middle Dniepr river (the area of contemporary Ukraine). According to this concept, the early Slavic culture assembled during the 5th century AD in the area of Cherniakhovo culture and then expanded very rapidly across Central and Eastern Europe due to extensive migrations [9]. To some extent, these two contradictory views on the earliest location of the Slavs have been verified with the recent findings of physical anthropology. Based on the newest anthropological data it has been suggested that the area between the Oder and Vistula rivers witnessed continuity of human settlement between the Roman period and the early Middle Ages. Indeed, based on morphological features of skeletal materials it has been established that populations of the Przeworsk, Wielbark and Cherniakhovo cultures from the Roman period bear close similarities to the early medieval Western Slavs and not to the medieval Germanic-speaking populations [10], [11]. Furthermore, paleodemographic studies also point to the biological continuity of the populations inhabiting the Oder and Vistula basin in the Roman period and the early medieval Slavic populations of this region [10]. Therefore, anthropological data received thus far make the “allochtonic” hypothesis less plausible, especially in its extreme migrationist form."
They adopted Arian Christianity which has the same main pillar of Islam which that there is only one God and making Jesus a God is a sin while they were heavily massacred by roman who were Catholic after the council of nicomidea in the 300s AD ,they were pagan Scandinavians who migrated to the Germanic lands ,they adopted arian Christianity so thr Romans did many massacres against them calling them "barbarians" while the arian tribes only wanted to do their religion freely ,after the massacres ,they migrated to the Frank land .
Where they didn't settle for long due to roman Catholic massacres on the m so they migrated to iberia and trained for many years for a revenge against Rome, where there leader which was one of who saw the massacres of his fellow men by Romans, the leader was called GAISRIC he trained his men well for a campaign of revenge and vengeance, he made a fleet and sailed to the infamous city of carthage which was under roman rule he defeated the Romans there and made carthage his capital this was about 400s or 450s AD ,the capture of carthage by there real name ,the "vandals" ,was a act of war against Rome, so Rome "the strongest power in the world", got all of its fleet the Eastern and western fleets to take back carthage ,however they weren't ready for the defeat they would get.
The Romans sailed the fleet which was the biggest fleet at that time to capture carthage so they sailed to Cape Bon where they were ready to battle the vandal weaker fleet ,the vandals already knew this battle might end their existence on earth ,so they designed a clever plan , the roman fleet was very big that at time every ship was near to ech other to much so vandals exploited it ,and the Romans was so confident of there fleet that it would crush the vandal one so they sent an ultimatum demanding the total surrender of the vandals this was only 5 days before the battle of Cape bon ,the roman said that if the vandals doesn't surrender in five days they will begin the battle of Cape bon but in those five gaisric was designing the awaited clever plan ,he waited to the wind to blow In the way of the roman fleet and blow in the back of his fleet , and at the 4th day of the 5 days of the ultimatum period, the battle began,.
Bold of you to assume irreligion will never spread in Eastern Europe. Speaking of, the map is pretty wrong, a large part of Russia is already irreligious, and so is eastern Hungary, and parts of southern Albania
@@EurasianBrownBear 796: Repression in Córdoba of the revolt of forced converts to Islam, exile of 20,000 Christian families. 797:Toledo massacre 817: New revolt in Córdoba by forced converts to Islam, expulsion of the inhabitants. 850: Christian merchant Juan de Córdoba is imprisoned and tortured for saying Muhammad's name during a sale 900: Christians of Córdoba are prohibited from building new churches. 1066: jewish massacre 1147: Invasion of the Almohads: expulsion of the Jews or forced conversions. "Tolerance" 🤣🤣🤣🤣
This has many errors. Firstly, Armenian Orthodoxy and Nicene Christianity were not different sects of Christianity. Armenia also accepted the Nicene Creed along with every other Christian Denomination. The Armenian Church and the Roman Church (Catholic and Orthodox) only schismed in 451 AD, when the Armenians, Copts, Syriacs, and other groups rejected the council of Chalcedon, these groups are now called the Oriental Orthodox church, which is distinct from Eastern Orthodoxy (called “Orthodoxism” in your video)
Amazing work bro! I can clearly tell the amount of detail, quality and effort that has gone into this video. I have some improvements: At 100BCE, the Hellenism title in the key disappears, when it's still on the map. In the future, In my opinion, Buddhism's growth has been exaggerated, especially in the UK where it's growing very slowly and only at around 0.5%. I think it would be more reasonable to replace that with Islam or Hinduism. But keep it up, well done
@@anthrosapien3784what software do you use to draw the religion borders and frames before you combine them into a video. Just asking as I need to improve my quality and my current software brush tool is very bad and can't add a brush stroke. Please reply
This totally isn’t biased Muslim propaganda, in the video Islam increases in the future and Christianity decreases. meanwhile in reality Albania, Turkey and every other country is already decreasing in Islam, Albania is already less than 50% Muslims and is still decreasing, and Turkey decreased 10% in Islam in the past 20 years
I'm surprised you pointed that out, but didn't point out how Iberia practically instantly converted to Islam upon conquest. It's important to note that just conquering an area ≠ instantly converting it. Moorish Iberia remained majority Christian for at least another 250 years until they caved in to the religious taxation. Turkey is much more accurate though, as migrations towards the region was in depopulation areas and thus it was easy to get a demographic majority in the region. However, of course, no map (and especially timelapse!) in 100% accurate. If you pay a lot of attention to all of the conversions, divisions, migrations, etc, you can find quite a bit of inaccuracies. This one sadly suffers from the "conversion through conquest is fast" theme, which is something most people think. There are also other inaccuracies, such as the fast conversion of Saxony (chiefdom) to Catholicism or the lack of specific sects. Of course, if I had to look at wikipedia articles of all religion in Europe over 5000 years, I'd just give up, so that's definitely dedication and commitment. The minor mistakes are honestly very negligible considering this.
Albanias muslims are decreasing because their populatioj are decreasing 😭 If you actually look at the statistixs, Albanian christians decreased too.. but we dont talk about facts I guess
"Islam doesnt belong in europe" meanwhile medieval europe having the turks, the holden horde and andalusia which were all muslim and controlled significant chunks of the continent and were no less foreign in there religion as was christianity to rome
I feel like the details on immigration at the end doesn't take into account that massive displacement due to flooding would also force people to move to Europe and other places below replacement rate. And that some countries like The Netherlands will simply not exist when that happens. But I can't expect this to also show sealevels rising for 75 years lol, too much work.
AGAIN: why you placed etruscan religion where etruscan was never been? North western Italy was CISALPINE GAUL, celtic-ligurian religion. Druidism was not a religion, the religion was CELTIC and it was different from place to place. And early Christianity in the same places.... This is a random map
Very interesting future for Europe in this video. Not sure if it’s realistic , but not impossible . I just think western nations and state governments won’t allow it but they have a bigger birth rate. You should make videos to expand on this it’s interesting
The video completely disregarded Eastern European medieval state of Volga Bulgaria (ancestors of modern Tatar and Chuvash) which started to become Muslim in VII-VIII centuries and finally adopted it as state religion in 922.
For that to happen, native Europeans must adopt Islam in enough numbers in first place. Then family values, and ethical, healthy moderate patriarchal society will revive in Europe. Islam isn't alien to Europeans, here in Russia a lot of White Muslims. The oldest are Tatars, who are European by culture, but adopted Islam 1200 years ago. Else, Europe will continue to age, shrink and become nations of childless elders until it perishes. Atheism, hedonism, extreme individualism and materialism never work in real society, they destroy demography
The white european converts are usually mixing with african/middle eastern muslims and have children with them, Whites having pure white children can only happen when 100% white communities are starting to converting and that won't happen.
Também gostava de saber, já encontraste alguma coisa? Conheces algum livro bom ou documentário sobre as religiões antigas de Portugal/Península Ibérica?
Awsome video. Though I would have expected various neo-pagan native european religions to start becoming prominent in Europe in the second half of the century
The Baltic borders are extremely inaccurate to anybody wondering. The biggest being that it just lumps the conversion to Christianity as an instantaneous one
@@alantacher7145 I understand everything, but for you Orthodoxy +- = Islam? Since you write "anything but Islam" if anything, Orthodoxy appeared before Catholicism and Protestantism
Estonia did not follow Baltic paganism, like ever, Baltic paganism refers to Pagan religion of the Balts, which are the Latvians and Lithuanians. Also Finno-Ugric Folk religions were followed way more in Russia which makes me just believe you did this map of the top of your head. This comment is meant to be contstructive, and the rest of the areas were very good!
I know some child is gonna say “sAvE eUrOpE” or say “ThE mOmMeNt EvErYtHiNg WeNt WrOnG towards a specific religion Cuz they can’t respect a certain religion
Tbh even tho I’m not a child I agree with the “sAvE eUrOpE” statement and “ the moment everything towards a specific religion “ but I do respect SOME religions god bless you
Logically speaking, if your faith is the true faith, then everyone else is wrong, and there is no respect to be had for wrong beliefs. Of course this isn’t isolated to conventional religion, atheists and other secular/irreligious sects are also guilty in this thought whether it is right or not.
@@wildgaming7715lmao the Austrian painter wipe them out what else would Jews live? Antartica? I think you should go to mars and see the earth is not flat.
Christianity increased by free will (Rome even persecuted Christians in the beginning) and this is what makes Christianity the world's greatest religion, not because it's expansive, but because it's accepted by free will. Islam increased by the sword (and of course, they were never persecuted, but were targets of enemies because they became an empire) and that's why even though being expansive, Islam isn't that great, because people were forced to accept their faith.
Besides being closer to Muslim dominated areas on the other side of the sea, there's no reason for this prediction about Sicily, as it's one of the areas in the Western Europe with lower islamic population - less than 0.5%.
th-cam.com/video/42DfGkJYEdc/w-d-xo.htmlsi=OPy1bH_SQ8ytDOF2
If you enjoyed this video then Please help me go and watch this full video i am deleting all the videos from this channel soon
I find it quite strange to show the different types of Christianity but showing Islam at the same time as a homogeneous religion, which at all isn’t the case. Would be interesting to see which Sects of Islam were prevalent at different times.
I was running out of colours lol
Also, I may be wrong, but aren’t most shia-majority areas… off this map?
There are only 2 major sects of Islam in large numbers and of which 1 sect is found only in Iran so there is a homogenous Islam in Europe
@@shoraidgaming4554но в средневековье сект Ислама было больше чем сейчас
@@shoraidgaming4554 nowadays maybe yes but historically no. Would u consider Arianism as major sect in Christianity today. Saying that there are only two major sects and that in Europe they’re alle Sunni just shows that u are not well informed in that topic. Even in Albania there are Bektashi Muslims which you could consider Shia. There are many different subgroups but it just would be nice to see at least the big three (Sunni, Shia, Ibadi) espacially considering the changes in dynasties throughout the Middle East and Muslim Spain. I mean if a region changed from Orthodxy to Catholicism he also showed it. In the way he has done it seems like Islam is just on big homogeneous blop which it might be to you but from a scholarly perspective it’s not
Ngl that's less atheists than i expected
Because irreligion =/= atheism. Majority are agnostic/spiritual
@@HarisP000yes.
There are lots of atheists there it's just that they tend to be concentrated in cities so they look less numerous on the map. The video isn't entirely accurate either imo. Certain large metropolitan areas like Paris, London, Madrid and Milan should definitely have some irreligion in there, moreover some considerable chunks of Russia (especially in the northwest region).
@@Euthenon Paris will be islam . Madrid and milan maybe irreligion and london i dont kno
same
8:33 You can see the Armenian Genocide happen here...
@@ethanlentzner9492 yep
The pre-Islamic Mesopotamia professed Nestorian Christianity, which was a subspecies of Nicene Christianity that had disputes with the Roman emperors-Chalcedonian. Nestorianism was a separate Christian formation supported by Zoroastrian rulers of Sassanid Iran
They were also in Yemen and hijaz too
@@hatim1.0 There were many religions in pre-Islamic Arabia, and we know that in the kingdom of Himyarite in present-day Yemen before the Sassanids conquered Yemen and made it their province, Judaism was practiced in Himyar for a long time
@@hatim1.0 In addition to Arab polytheism, various varieties of Christianity and, to a lesser extent, Zoroastrianism were widespread in pre-Islamic Arabia, although the Arabs were never adherents of Zoroastrianism
@@hatim1.0 The Arab kingdoms of the Lakhmids (most of the time vassals of the Sassanids) and the Ghassanids (vassals of Eastern Rome) practiced Monophysitism with an admixture of local beliefs. The Lakhmids were also more influenced by Zoroastrian practices than any other Arabs, given their subordinate status in relation to the Iranian Sassanids
mesopotamians christian? yeah ok lol
9:25 Buddhism in Russia is the national religion of Kalmyks, so it can't be real.
Assuming that some radical new preacher or interpretation of Buddhism emerges and starts preaching
@@anthrosapien3784 O que sus seguidores se reproduzcan en masa y empiecen a conquistar como si fueran musulmanes en sus inicios.
Це ж треба ТАК обкуритися 😂
@@anthrosapien3784Iranian Snothern Caucasians Shia's 🗿🇮🇷
@@anthrosapien3784I expect this more in Europe than in the Caucasus.
England adopted Cristianity during the Roman times, but with the anglo-saxon invasion they became pagans. Then, they adopted Catholicism. Anglo-Saxons never adopted Celtic Church
I think they did adopt the Celtic church
@@wegfarir1963 Bede said they didn't.
@@wegfarir1963 Northumbrians briefly used the Celtic dating system for Easter if I remember correctly, but other than that, the Saxons were Catholic, starting with Augustine in Kent. TBF the "Celtic Church" isnt really a clearly defined thing in the same way as Catholics and Orthadox. Northumbrians switch at the Synod of Whitby in 664.
That said, the original comment was right, as far as Historians are concerned, Christanity was probably almost entirely wiped out in England during the Saxon invasions (or at least, there is very little archeological evidence for its survival).
The video is ridiculous and riddled with errors and inventions of the author.
@@repippeas I thought the Celtic Church was only a form of catholicism that developed in Great-Britain and Ireland and the Roman Church was alright with it, because the celtic saints are still official, like Saint Patrick. When I read about it, the Celtic Church was called "Celtic Branch of the Catholic Church" and many celtic bishops got along with roman bishops
Future of Europe is wild.
Catholic saints who were given visions of the future by God say that there’s supposed to be a chastisement, followed by a short golden age, then comes the Anti-Christ.
During the chastisement, Islam will take over parts of Europe but only for a very short time.
During the short golden age, Europe will be ruled by a French Catholic Monarch who will restore Christianity in Europe.
Many countries will convert to Christianity, even China.
WW3 is said to be apart of the chastisement. Many prophets have had the same vision of Russia invading Europe all the way the the Rhine. But then the Russians are pushed back and defeated.
Many miracles will take place.
Also the monarchies will return.
Future of Europe is Catholic
Islam will balkanize the entirety of Europe. Expect your life to be spent in turmoil if you live in Europe.
All things considered, the ending is pretty likely. Nice video, it's clear you did your research 👍
@@willraley1789 thank you!
Boy I know that the people in the comments section is super mature and okay by seeing other religions, right?
left
Different religions exist?! Wtf?! Armenian Orthodoxy was and always will be the only real religion!
(If you can't tell, I'm being sarcastic)
@@Theguyrond Armenians🤡
istg youtube comments get absolutely braindead whenever religion is involved
Real
Buddhists after 2040: "It's free real estate."
Wow what a hilarious meme I've never seen that before LOL!!!!!
their religion is as flawed as christianity
lol
1) The conversion to Islam is too fast here, it took a long time for the Levant and Mesopotamia to fully convert. In some places like northern Mesopotamia the Christian Assyrian majority hold out for a long time.
2) What is that large Zoroastrian pocket in western Iran that survives till 1919? Such a thing didn't exist, Zoroastrians were already a small minority by the beginning of 1800s and were mostly in central Iran like Yazd and Kerman.
3) Slavs didn't went that deep into Russia in ancient times, even in early middle ages large parts of European Russia was Uralic.
4) Hungarian paganism is missing, the Hungarians were pagan for significant amount of time after they settled in the Carpathian basin.
Also the author completely disregarded Eastern European state of Volga Bulgaria (ancestors of modern Tatar and Chuvash) which started to become Muslim in VII-VIII centuries and finally adopted it as state religion in 922.
How did you put these blue text
@@DoisMitosEmBuscaDeAventuras I don't know what are you talking about
Yes because Arabs did not force them to convert
True, Christians didn't converted, but Zoroastrians converted very quickly because Islam is just a Synthesis of Persian and Arabic religions.
Blud forgot abt the pastafarian revolution of 2056
Man! I always leave something out
The post-2024 events are pure nonsense.
Except the population crisis in the Balkans
@@danielescalantedemedeiros.balkans always going through it
Explain
@@anthrosapien3784 Most of these events make no sense considering modern politics.
Like Italy turning "fascist" and so Muslim groups take over Sicily and start committing genocide there, and they succeed in doing so.
Something like this would never have a chance of happening and succeeding in today's world.
@@14Misantrop88 yeah, in "todays" world you are assuming that conditions do not deteriorate as a result of collapsing birth rates and climate change and environmental issues in the future
0:22 Animism in north of Nordics als exist in the Philippins but mostly not recognized due to Spanish Colonization
Orthodoxy and Catholicism didn’t split in the eighth century, they split in 1054.
Only the Visogothic upper class were Arians, the majority of the population were still Chalcedonian Christians
Russia from 1920 to 90 should've been atheist
yeah but im pretty sure most of them still believed in orthodoxism.
LMFAOOOOOOO BUDDHIST CAUCASUS 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
And Cornwall!
Hoi4 peace confrence momen
i really wonder how it managed to create a pretty good foothold in the caucasus…
i really wonder how it managed to create a pretty good foothold in the caucasus…
Would be an improvement.
There are almost no Buddhists in the Caucasus, the Lower Volga Region and the Northern Black Sea region, only Orthodox. I've been there many times and I know many people from there, so I've seen it for myself. The only region with Buddhism here is Kalmykia, but otherwise only Orthodox, so the number of Buddhists on the map is nonsense.
The Lower Volga have a lot of Tatars and Kazakhs, who are Muslims
@@mrobocop1666 No, there are almost none in the Lower Volga region. There are in the Middle Volga region, in Tatarstan and Bashkiria, but Muslims are almost not found outside their borders. I was there and I can honestly say.
Tengrism in Europe: 🙂
Tengrism in Eurasia: ☠️
In the 5th-6th centuries, the should have been way more Oriental Orthodox/Miaphysite in the Eastern Mediterranean.
I just noticed that Lake Balaton disappeared in 1037 AD
Great video btw, really informative, and it was fun to watch the outlines of empires modify the distribution of religions
Lol, just went back and suredly yeah yer right
Where is Balaton?
@@TheGalaxyMapper Western Hungary
The future looks so weird
The Celtic Church was not separate from Nicene Christianity. Orthodoxy is called just that as well, not "Orthodoxism."
Bro that Protestantism music is Yorkscher Marsch of Prussia written by Ludwig Beethoven.
Yessir
What version? There's so many across TH-cam.
Considering the Hussites to be “Protestant” instead of “Proto-Protestant” seems kinda disingenuous to the Hussites
Of course people would be mad about the future of Europe section, its straight up alternate history not projections and arguably less plausible alternate history given it isn't even based on the projections after a few decades.
Славянская Аркона, которая была на территории Германии, нервно курит в сторонке... а Германцев в Европу загнали Гунны с Антами... они не всегда там жили.
What I was waiting for
По поводу буддизма, я не согласен. Сам живу на Кубани. Эта одна из самых православных территорий России. Никаких признаков развития буддизма не наблюдал. Я больше поверю в распространение ислама, чем буддизма. Так что автор, ты не прав
Мусульмане могут просто перерезать и поработить все местное население и заселить эту землю мусульманами. От буддизма таких приколов вряд ли можно ожидать
In 966, Poland has adopted Catholicism as main religion. Although, i dont know when peasants adopted catholicism in Poland
Lower strata of Polish people was slow to adopt Christianity and the process of christianization lasted for centuries. It is agreed by historians that this process ended by the 16th century. Meaning that from 16th century onwards all Polish peasants were Christian in name, even if their understanding of the new religion was minimal.
Many peasants continued to practice some of the Pagan practises well into 19th century, with some historians making claims even about early 20th century. These practises beget Folk Catholicism, that is a hybrid of Catholic and Pagan customs. In addition to that mainstraim Catholicism in Poland incorporated some Pagan traditions and cultivates them to this day.
In more remote areas of Poland Paganism was still practiced even in 15th century as exemplified by contemporary chronicles, such as "Postylla Łukasza z Wielkiego Koźmina" from 1405-1412, or Annales seu cronicae incliti Regni Poloniae of Jan Długosz from 1455-1480.
I bet this comment section will be completely and totally peaceful and respectful when discussing the future of Europe :)
What videos would you guys like to see me make next?
A continuation of the homonin species one?
The Middle East or Southeast Asia
Far east religion every year
Dude... you know that Islam is a religion, right... I know that you Europeans are paranoid about birth rates of sons of Muslim immigrants but... have you ever thought about the possibility of native Europeans converting to Islam ???
Islam is a religion... not a race... your own ancestors were once pagans who converted to Christianity...
9:44 insurgents n western Germany is It suppose to be in
Expected Judaism on Khazaria during 600 to 900 CE, but supposedly it's not as common as Tengriism?
tengriism wasnt in the western steppes that far back
Wrong, georgia 🇬🇪 was one of the first countries ever to accept Christianity, georgia accepted Christianity in 4th century after the Saint Nino spread Christianity in Kingdom of Iberia, aka georgia.
Few issues with this:
You put slavic paganism on the map way before slavs even were in Europe, Slavs started settling Eastern and Central Europe in 5th and 6th century CE, you had them settled there since 6th century BCE, also you ignored the fact that what is current day eastern part of Germany was settled by Slavs as well in early medieval period, in general, you ignored the entire Migration Period
You also didn't account for the christinization of Great Moravia
You also marked the lands of modern day Hungary as always being part of slavic paganism, ignoring the fact that the people who settled there, first the Avars and later early Hungarians, practiced their own form of paganism, before the Hungarians adopted Christianity
Also, you split Christianity into Catholic and Orthodox before the Great Schism of 1054
And final note, you can't really call this video a "history" if you also include speculative development, what are you basing this prediction on? You didn't cite anything that would support your claims
Slavic paganism may have well been there before 6th century BCE. There are two contradicting school of thought on the matter. The one you are reffering to, the migrationist. And allochtonic, which sees Slavs as inhabiting Central and Eastern Europe since only Indo-Europeans spread over Europe for the first time.
The migrationist one is often dubbed the German interpretation, because it derives from Prussian times of 19th century attempts of germanization of the Prussian partition of Poland, where German intelectuals seeking to diminish Slavs, while lead by the wave of German romanticism and chauvinism declared Slavs to be incapable of creating any advanced culture and to undermine Slavic presence in Central and Eastern Europe stated that people who lived there between 8th century BCE and 7th century CE couldn't have been Slavic, and have to be Germanic instead. They needed that to justify their claim to the lands of Central and Eastern Europe and to boost their sense of supposed superiority. The theory howerer, is not proven and is of rather dubious nature. Why all other Indo-European people were present in Europe before 8th century BCE in their respective lands, but just Slavs supposedly were not? Considering from whom this claim comes from it is not to be trusted.
@@Dux-ex-Tenebris The Migration Period is a widely accepted event that took place about 300 - 600 CE and included way more groups of people than Slavs, like Franks, Goths, Huns, Avars, Magyars and many other, it's possible the original proposal of this event might have had more than dubious reasoning behind it, but since then studies of this period have changed and developed
I couldn't find what allochtonic is, I've only found what allochronic is, so I assume it's a typo, Johannes Fabian proposed this discourse in the 80's and it was a way to criticize the Eurocentricity of anthropology at the time, that too many researchers act like the contemporary subjects they study exist in a different time, thus making them look more static and primitive than actually living and currently existing cultures, I couldn't find anything to directly connect this discourse to the Migration Period, it's just a perspective researcher can adopt while studying contemporary cultures, and since it was proposed over 40 years ago I assume it's something widely accepted by the anthropologists of today
@@Bohous156 Firstly, I am sorry for the confusion with terms. Instead of "allochtonic" in my first paragraph I should have written "autochthonic". This is the theory of Slavs inhabiting Europe since BCE. The migrationist and still more commonly accepted theory is called "allochtonic". It is not a typo. To find more about it try some uncensored search engine like DuckDuckGo, and then type for instance "slavic migration allochtonic" - it should yield some results.
The proven migration you mention (300-700CE) is about Slavs dispersing from their original abode in approximately modern Belarus (although they may well have inhabited modern day Poland as well) to conquer majority of Central, Eastern, and South-Eastern Europe. You wrote at the beginning that Slavs were not even in Europe, and that is false, as they were settling modern day Belarus at the very least. The theory I wrote about is not even about this time period, but about ages BCE.
To give you a better imagination of the idea in another comment I will copy an introduction from genetic research paper from 2013 titled "The History of Slavs Inferred from Complete Mitochondrial Genome Sequences". You can find it on NIH, that is on the US National Institutes of Health in their National Library of Medicine. It's an official governmental website.
@@Bohous156 "The Slavs are the most numerous population of Central and Eastern Europe. Nowadays, about 268 million people inhabiting well over half of Europe speak thirteen languages (and their dialects) belonging to the Slavic language group [1]. First remarks about Slavic populations can be found in the written sources of East Roman and Byzantine authors, dated around 550 AD. Although these reports characterized Slavic tribes that had lived at that time, the antecedent history of that ethnic groups remained unrevealed. Therefore, the issue of the earliest location of Slavs has been deliberated over the past century from the historical, archaeological, ethnographic and linguistic viewpoint (e.g. [1]-[5].) Although the ongoing discussion in these fields unanimously indicates their common origin, the results of various studies indicate different time and place of their formation. A number of alternative “homelands” of the Slavs have been suggested thus far (reviewed briefly in [1]). Many hypotheses have been proposed to explain the origin of Slavs, but the most widely discussed are “autochthonous” and “allochthonous” (migrationist) theories [6]. The “autochthonous” conception points to the continuity of cultural development of the Central Europe (the area between the Oder and Vistula rivers) from the Bronze Age until the historical appearance of the Slavs in the early Middle Ages. According to this hypothesis, the Bronze and Iron Age Lusatian culture of the area between the Oder and Vistula is considered as Proto-Slavic and subsequent Zarubinets-Przeworsk cultures (200 BC -200 AD) are included in the putative Slavic “homeland” [7], [8]. From the very beginning, this hypothesis has been challenged by some German archeologists who claim that the Przeworsk region was more arguably within an early Germanic-speaking territory [2]. Alternatively, the “allochthonous” (migrationist) assumption tracks the earliest Slavic territory to the area stretching from Carpathian foothills to the Pripet and the left bank of the middle Dniepr river (the area of contemporary Ukraine). According to this concept, the early Slavic culture assembled during the 5th century AD in the area of Cherniakhovo culture and then expanded very rapidly across Central and Eastern Europe due to extensive migrations [9]. To some extent, these two contradictory views on the earliest location of the Slavs have been verified with the recent findings of physical anthropology. Based on the newest anthropological data it has been suggested that the area between the Oder and Vistula rivers witnessed continuity of human settlement between the Roman period and the early Middle Ages. Indeed, based on morphological features of skeletal materials it has been established that populations of the Przeworsk, Wielbark and Cherniakhovo cultures from the Roman period bear close similarities to the early medieval Western Slavs and not to the medieval Germanic-speaking populations [10], [11]. Furthermore, paleodemographic studies also point to the biological continuity of the populations inhabiting the Oder and Vistula basin in the Roman period and the early medieval Slavic populations of this region [10]. Therefore, anthropological data received thus far make the “allochtonic” hypothesis less plausible, especially in its extreme migrationist form."
Also wrong is sweden bcs sweden was mostly pagan until the 12th century except the far south who became chgistian in 11th century
Do the middle east next!
You are back!
Antalya, Istambul, Izmir will be atheist, and west and north polland aslo.
When the Arian Germanic tribes invaded Western Europe, they never made up a majority in the land they settled.
True
Nice pfp
They adopted Arian Christianity which has the same main pillar of Islam which that there is only one God and making Jesus a God is a sin while they were heavily massacred by roman who were Catholic after the council of nicomidea in the 300s AD ,they were pagan Scandinavians who migrated to the Germanic lands ,they adopted arian Christianity so thr Romans did many massacres against them calling them "barbarians" while the arian tribes only wanted to do their religion freely ,after the massacres ,they migrated to the Frank land .
Where they didn't settle for long due to roman Catholic massacres on the m so they migrated to iberia and trained for many years for a revenge against Rome, where there leader which was one of who saw the massacres of his fellow men by Romans, the leader was called GAISRIC he trained his men well for a campaign of revenge and vengeance, he made a fleet and sailed to the infamous city of carthage which was under roman rule he defeated the Romans there and made carthage his capital this was about 400s or 450s AD ,the capture of carthage by there real name ,the "vandals" ,was a act of war against Rome, so Rome "the strongest power in the world", got all of its fleet the Eastern and western fleets to take back carthage ,however they weren't ready for the defeat they would get.
The Romans sailed the fleet which was the biggest fleet at that time to capture carthage so they sailed to Cape Bon where they were ready to battle the vandal weaker fleet ,the vandals already knew this battle might end their existence on earth ,so they designed a clever plan , the roman fleet was very big that at time every ship was near to ech other to much so vandals exploited it ,and the Romans was so confident of there fleet that it would crush the vandal one so they sent an ultimatum demanding the total surrender of the vandals this was only 5 days before the battle of Cape bon ,the roman said that if the vandals doesn't surrender in five days they will begin the battle of Cape bon but in those five gaisric was designing the awaited clever plan ,he waited to the wind to blow In the way of the roman fleet and blow in the back of his fleet , and at the 4th day of the 5 days of the ultimatum period, the battle began,.
Bold of you to assume irreligion will never spread in Eastern Europe.
Speaking of, the map is pretty wrong, a large part of Russia is already irreligious, and so is eastern Hungary, and parts of southern Albania
Imagine if all of Europe were Islamic.
And we're still on top, and behind it all. ✡️
А я знаю, что в будущем все народы пойдут по пути Единого Б-га. И это будет очень скоро!
The Great Prot Hussites.
Respect to Spain, they saved Europe from the unthinkable.
They commit genocide on a highly one of the most tolerant countries in the world
@@EurasianBrownBear
796: Repression in Córdoba of the revolt of forced converts to Islam, exile of 20,000 Christian families.
797:Toledo massacre
817: New revolt in Córdoba by forced converts to Islam, expulsion of the inhabitants.
850: Christian merchant Juan de Córdoba is imprisoned and tortured for saying Muhammad's name during a sale
900: Christians of Córdoba are prohibited from building new churches.
1066: jewish massacre
1147: Invasion of the Almohads: expulsion of the Jews or forced conversions.
"Tolerance" 🤣🤣🤣🤣
VERY VERY GOOD WORK. It was very interesting.
This has many errors. Firstly, Armenian Orthodoxy and Nicene Christianity were not different sects of Christianity. Armenia also accepted the Nicene Creed along with every other Christian Denomination. The Armenian Church and the Roman Church (Catholic and Orthodox) only schismed in 451 AD, when the Armenians, Copts, Syriacs, and other groups rejected the council of Chalcedon, these groups are now called the Oriental Orthodox church, which is distinct from Eastern Orthodoxy (called “Orthodoxism” in your video)
Thanks for the feedback
@@anthrosapien3784 no problem, i understand the organization of denominations can be confusing so i just wanted to let you know for future reference
Croatia was always Catholic.
The pope blessed the Croatian duke in 879. and said the Croatian duke Branimir governs wisely
Strange to see Christian Turkey
I like how you displayed the areas of ancient pagan religions instead of just marking them on the map.
so good to see christianity fade away.
Amazing work bro! I can clearly tell the amount of detail, quality and effort that has gone into this video.
I have some improvements:
At 100BCE, the Hellenism title in the key disappears, when it's still on the map.
In the future, In my opinion, Buddhism's growth has been exaggerated, especially in the
UK where it's growing very slowly and only at around 0.5%. I think it would be more reasonable to replace that with Islam or Hinduism.
But keep it up, well done
FUCK I didn't even realize about Hellenism
@@anthrosapien3784 lol
@@anthrosapien3784what software do you use to draw the religion borders and frames before you combine them into a video. Just asking as I need to improve my quality and my current software brush tool is very bad and can't add a brush stroke. Please reply
@@RealDataStats8320 I just use Paint.net
@@RealDataStats8320Pero si el Paint es gratis.
This totally isn’t biased Muslim propaganda, in the video Islam increases in the future and Christianity decreases. meanwhile in reality Albania, Turkey and every other country is already decreasing in Islam, Albania is already less than 50% Muslims and is still decreasing, and Turkey decreased 10% in Islam in the past 20 years
@@RonaIdoSoccer did u pay attention to the video? I clearly showed the Christian populations in the middle east increasing in the future
@@anthrosapien3784 in Europe
Christianity has decreased in Albania and Turkey Along with the rest of Europe.
I'm surprised you pointed that out, but didn't point out how Iberia practically instantly converted to Islam upon conquest. It's important to note that just conquering an area ≠ instantly converting it. Moorish Iberia remained majority Christian for at least another 250 years until they caved in to the religious taxation.
Turkey is much more accurate though, as migrations towards the region was in depopulation areas and thus it was easy to get a demographic majority in the region.
However, of course, no map (and especially timelapse!) in 100% accurate. If you pay a lot of attention to all of the conversions, divisions, migrations, etc, you can find quite a bit of inaccuracies. This one sadly suffers from the "conversion through conquest is fast" theme, which is something most people think.
There are also other inaccuracies, such as the fast conversion of Saxony (chiefdom) to Catholicism or the lack of specific sects. Of course, if I had to look at wikipedia articles of all religion in Europe over 5000 years, I'd just give up, so that's definitely dedication and commitment. The minor mistakes are honestly very negligible considering this.
Albanias muslims are decreasing because their populatioj are decreasing 😭
If you actually look at the statistixs, Albanian christians decreased too.. but we dont talk about facts I guess
Honestly kudos to the Zoroastrians for sticking in there for so long against Christianity and Islam
9:41 "Atheist estremist terror group" 😭😂
Now a video like this from the American continent. 👀
Can somebody tell what Zoroastrians doing in Iran all the way to WW1? I thought they stopped existing in Iran earlier.
2:17 Has Hellenism been replaced with the Hittite religion in the key?
I think so
Please do next history of religion in all of North America. And next in South America.
Map is wrong. Putting Croatia more Orthodox than Serbia. That is an insult to both nations😂
Why are Scythians depicted has tengrists
"Islam doesnt belong in europe" meanwhile medieval europe having the turks, the holden horde and andalusia which were all muslim and controlled significant chunks of the continent and were no less foreign in there religion as was christianity to rome
I feel like the details on immigration at the end doesn't take into account that massive displacement due to flooding would also force people to move to Europe and other places below replacement rate. And that some countries like The Netherlands will simply not exist when that happens. But I can't expect this to also show sealevels rising for 75 years lol, too much work.
AGAIN: why you placed etruscan religion where etruscan was never been? North western Italy was CISALPINE GAUL, celtic-ligurian religion. Druidism was not a religion, the religion was CELTIC and it was different from place to place. And early Christianity in the same places.... This is a random map
It’s called Orthodoxy not Orthodoxism
Very interesting future for Europe in this video. Not sure if it’s realistic , but not impossible . I just think western nations and state governments won’t allow it but they have a bigger birth rate. You should make videos to expand on this it’s interesting
Very nice work
The video completely disregarded Eastern European medieval state of Volga Bulgaria (ancestors of modern Tatar and Chuvash) which started to become Muslim in VII-VIII centuries and finally adopted it as state religion in 922.
no sarmatians and no gnostics (bogomils, cathars, bosnians)?
the nordics were like "oh wait frick, iceland's still catholic better go change that"
Kievan Rus was baptised in 988, could´ve mark at least some major cities. And i have no idea where you get that buddhists from, there are none
My guy really said Zoroastrianism was the majority Iranian religion until 1917 😭😭
Do you have all of Asia by chance? Or all of North/South America?
Hopefully Islam convinces native Europeans to have more children.
For that to happen, native Europeans must adopt Islam in enough numbers in first place. Then family values, and ethical, healthy moderate patriarchal society will revive in Europe.
Islam isn't alien to Europeans, here in Russia a lot of White Muslims. The oldest are Tatars, who are European by culture, but adopted Islam 1200 years ago.
Else, Europe will continue to age, shrink and become nations of childless elders until it perishes. Atheism, hedonism, extreme individualism and materialism never work in real society, they destroy demography
The white european converts are usually mixing with african/middle eastern muslims and have children with them, Whites having pure white children can only happen when 100% white communities are starting to converting and that won't happen.
Interesting, what sources did you read for the 5th and 4th century expansion of druidism into "iberian animism"?
Também gostava de saber, já encontraste alguma coisa? Conheces algum livro bom ou documentário sobre as religiões antigas de Portugal/Península Ibérica?
@@MrGrieves24666 suponho que isto:
repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/handle/1822/66460
dc.uwm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1024&context=ekeltoi
Awsome video. Though I would have expected various neo-pagan native european religions to start becoming prominent in Europe in the second half of the century
Si, solo que no se habla mucho de que están creciendo, en Grecia se estima que llegarán de forma pesimista a 100000 en 2030
Amazing video! Thank you very much!
Reconquista Now
in ur dreams islam will keep growing
cry now
@@korrzia It seems you're the one crying.
@@korrzia Growing doesn't mean Islam is true, if majority meant reality, then the pagans were true since the beginning
@@desativadoofficialas if tge trinity is true
The background music is fire
Person: European borders are a mess
AnthroSapien: i would like to introduce you to religion
What about all the Jewish communities?
2nd song name pls
Seeing the little green dots appear in West Europe made me barf.
Great!
The Baltic borders are extremely inaccurate to anybody wondering. The biggest being that it just lumps the conversion to Christianity as an instantaneous one
the best faith is Orthodoxy
Anything but Islam 😂
@@alantacher7145 I understand everything, but for you Orthodoxy +- = Islam? Since you write "anything but Islam" if anything, Orthodoxy appeared before Catholicism and Protestantism
Post-2024 was crazy ngl 💀
Estonia did not follow Baltic paganism, like ever, Baltic paganism refers to Pagan religion of the Balts, which are the Latvians and Lithuanians. Also Finno-Ugric Folk religions were followed way more in Russia which makes me just believe you did this map of the top of your head. This comment is meant to be contstructive, and the rest of the areas were very good!
Still waiting for part 3 of what if India never partitioned…
I know some child is gonna say “sAvE eUrOpE” or say
“ThE mOmMeNt EvErYtHiNg WeNt WrOnG towards a specific religion
Cuz they can’t respect a certain religion
Tbh even tho I’m not a child I agree with the “sAvE eUrOpE” statement and “ the moment everything towards a specific religion “ but I do respect SOME religions god bless you
@@taniamariolamenalaboriel7444bruh … when Europeans colonize you become silent but when immigrants go to Europe you think they are invading Europe 😂
@@thefrenchempire14fr the blatant hypocrisy
Logically speaking, if your faith is the true faith, then everyone else is wrong, and there is no respect to be had for wrong beliefs. Of course this isn’t isolated to conventional religion, atheists and other secular/irreligious sects are also guilty in this thought whether it is right or not.
For those thinking what happened to Zoroastrianism, Islam happened.
You forgot the Bosnian Church from the 12th century to the 15th century
Poland will still be the most religious country🗿
not yet just wait
@@korrzia It still is.
Sadly
Sadly
Atheism seems to be on the rise in Poland.
7:12 Isr@el should have to be established there in Germany where that blue spot is
You can say israel
@@therealestrobert We cannot say cursed things without censoring them...
@@wildgaming7715bro is brain rot to the core
@@wildgaming7715 it's just a country
@@wildgaming7715lmao the Austrian painter wipe them out what else would Jews live? Antartica? I think you should go to mars and see the earth is not flat.
Notice which one was spread under the sword?
Abrahamic religions, Islam, Christianity and so on.
Christianity and it's pal Islam
Conquest doesn't equal religious conversion.
@@Giga-cat-c6b Most of the time, it is.
Christianity increased by free will (Rome even persecuted Christians in the beginning) and this is what makes Christianity the world's greatest religion, not because it's expansive, but because it's accepted by free will.
Islam increased by the sword (and of course, they were never persecuted, but were targets of enemies because they became an empire) and that's why even though being expansive, Islam isn't that great, because people were forced to accept their faith.
Didn’t see a sign location blue for Judaism. Then you make Protestantism the same color scheme?!?
The Slavic regions adopted christianity in 966-988, but they don’t show that until the 11th century
2046 in caucaus be like: oh, wtf, now im shaulin warior?
Europe is going to become europistan in the future...
Not really *Reconquest of Anatolia happens*
and there's nothing wrong with that :)
@@valiarsharapov152 так россия тоже вместе с ней
@@kirilll7806 так в ряде регионов россии ислам традиционная религия (европы тоже, кстати говоря)
Already happened with Christianity, most Euros see no problem with it happening a second time.
Besides being closer to Muslim dominated areas on the other side of the sea, there's no reason for this prediction about Sicily, as it's one of the areas in the Western Europe with lower islamic population - less than 0.5%.