The Zeroth Law of Thermodynamics: Thermal Equilibrium

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 มี.ค. 2017
  • You've heard of the laws of thermodynamics, but did you know there are actually four of them? It's true, and since they already had laws one, two, and three, but then wanted to formulate another more fundamental one, the number right before one is zero so that's what they called it! Also, "zeroth" is fun to say. Let's say it together.
    Watch the whole Classical Physics playlist: bit.ly/ProfDavePhysics1
    Modern Physics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDavePhysics2
    Mathematics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveMaths
    General Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveGenChem
    Organic Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveOrgChem
    Biochemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBiochem
    Biology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBio
    EMAIL► ProfessorDaveExplains@gmail.com
    PATREON► / professordaveexplains
    Check out "Is This Wi-Fi Organic?", my book on disarming pseudoscience!
    Amazon: amzn.to/2HtNpVH
    Bookshop: bit.ly/39cKADM
    Barnes and Noble: bit.ly/3pUjmrn
    Book Depository: bit.ly/3aOVDlT

ความคิดเห็น • 111

  • @LiveFreeOrDie2A
    @LiveFreeOrDie2A 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    *The Zeroeth Law of Thermodynamics:
    “Objects in thermal equilibrium are in thermal equalibrium”*
    Next level.. Ground breaking.. Mind Blown. I can discover new laws of physics too!..
    *Newton's Zeroeth Law Of Motion: "An object at rest is at rest and an object in motion is in motion”*

    • @kishore4314
      @kishore4314 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol

    • @mercurius1488
      @mercurius1488 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      May seem trivial now that you've already been taught to properly reason but it took thousands of years for these notions to become common knowledge. The only reason science is able to reach astronomical levels of complexity is because they stand on the shoulders of these physicist giants who spent their lives correctly developing the fundamentals.

  • @reaper4812
    @reaper4812 4 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    Zeroth sounds like a damn videogame boss

    • @sanjith1162
      @sanjith1162 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Zeroth means 0th just like second (2nd) it's not a person 😬

    • @chewinggum5550
      @chewinggum5550 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@sanjith1162 r/woooosh

    • @em310
      @em310 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@chewinggum5550 r/ihavereddit

    • @Carrymejane
      @Carrymejane หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hahaha

    • @Carrymejane
      @Carrymejane หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@sanjith1162 bro not fun 😭

  • @joshuamwesigwa256
    @joshuamwesigwa256 6 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    I really appreciate it, your explanation has helped me lots hear. Sure all physics may sometimes seem hard to understand but finally gets easier with continued revision.

  • @FourthRoot
    @FourthRoot ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It wasn't until I was a senior in college that I realized that temperature is not nearly as simple of a concept as it seems.
    Because we can sense temperature, our concept of it forms before we develop language or lasting memories. But ask any non-physics major what it technically means and they'll draw a blank or give slightly incorrect answers like "temperature is the average speed, momentum, or energy, of the atoms."
    but in reality, it's an ordinal scale that describes the statistical tendency of objects to transfer or absorb thermal energy with other objects. And applying arithmetic to temperature figures will only ever get you an appropriate answer. An object's heat capacity depends on its temperature, so calculating a change in temperature given a change in thermal energy isn't so easy. The ideal gas law makes predictions about the temperature, pressure, and volume of gasses, but even helium deviates from this law slightly especially at very low temperatures.

  • @darkzu5718
    @darkzu5718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    thanks bro my 6th grade teacher was giving me such a hard time but you taught me well in thermodynamics, thanks professor have a great day.

  • @yosishewangizaw6430
    @yosishewangizaw6430 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    that is great explanation professor thank you very much.

  • @manjulabalu6919
    @manjulabalu6919 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Faar better than other Educational channels..
    Pleasant explanation by Dave Sir..👍

  • @nabeelmohamed4098
    @nabeelmohamed4098 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    nice explanation ever!! thanks

  • @Maddiverse6300
    @Maddiverse6300 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great explanation thank you sir! ❤

  • @carlorozzi6916
    @carlorozzi6916 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Hey Profesor Dave, I'm a 7th grade science teacher and I think your videos are pretty good. You're cool. Keep it coming!!

    • @sraaahsraaah9793
      @sraaahsraaah9793 ปีที่แล้ว

      u teach this to ur 7nth graderss!???

    • @Noob_Fantom
      @Noob_Fantom ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sraaahsraaah9793 😂maybe he want to make their students future einstein

    • @sraaahsraaah9793
      @sraaahsraaah9793 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Noob_Fantom which grade u in??

    • @Noob_Fantom
      @Noob_Fantom ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sraaahsraaah9793 am a college student

  • @Lucifer-cd2wq
    @Lucifer-cd2wq 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Prof, can you give two or three examples that you can say that the zeroth law is prensent on it?

  • @amanrubey
    @amanrubey 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    thank you so much sir in strengthening my weak topic.
    I want your thermodynamics videos in order so help me

  • @reenkyle172
    @reenkyle172 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow best explanation of all times

  • @shreyanshpuri3298
    @shreyanshpuri3298 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks a lot professor ✨

  • @Ikigai747
    @Ikigai747 ปีที่แล้ว

    to the point and awesome loved it

  • @ivand.fababaer4007
    @ivand.fababaer4007 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Need help
    Figure A. The objects A and B are inside a closed system ( isolated with the outside environment) wherein they are separated with adiabatic wall (no flow of energy)
    Figure B. Is separated with diathermic wall (permits the flow of energy)
    Explain how the zeroth law of thermodynamics in the figure A and B

  • @angeliemaebonaobra4448
    @angeliemaebonaobra4448 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you Professor Dave!

  • @battlerages.official4577
    @battlerages.official4577 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Prof : Plz If You Could Explain The Full Thermodynamics which is Required to Crack Jee/ IIT / Neet

  • @jaamaccabdi3187
    @jaamaccabdi3187 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for you helping me
    Iam very glad to understand you my lessons

  • @ajinkyadeshpande6271
    @ajinkyadeshpande6271 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    thanks sir . please make a series on full thermodynamics.

  • @issackkasesela6389
    @issackkasesela6389 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was confusing before , thanks much prof

  • @MehulBShah
    @MehulBShah 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are from which country sir?? Awesome explanation 👌🏻🔥

  • @rubesh655
    @rubesh655 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir pls suggest the book from which we get basic of thermodynamics

  • @bestofluckwithsearchoffutu6048
    @bestofluckwithsearchoffutu6048 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice explanation thanks sir from Pakistan

  • @bitangma.leovillegrace8076
    @bitangma.leovillegrace8076 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!

  • @jaamaccabdi3187
    @jaamaccabdi3187 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thnks preffosor

  • @abdelrahmanmohamed2767
    @abdelrahmanmohamed2767 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    عظمه ع عظمه ياديف

  • @nabarupghosh8257
    @nabarupghosh8257 5 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Sir... please look at this Indian actor.. Ranbir Kapoor.... He..literally... looks like you!!!

  • @ariyarathneachala6234
    @ariyarathneachala6234 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @lukasplucinsky
    @lukasplucinsky 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    how would define the term "thermal equilibrium"?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      when there is no heat transfer, meaning things are at the same temperature

    • @zack150
      @zack150 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      But isn't thermal equilibrium dynamic as well?
      so there is a constant transfer of heat but just at the same rate?

    • @bweeeeniee1131
      @bweeeeniee1131 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@zack150 that's what I know, too it's just that the change is equal to zero

  • @amuthan2898
    @amuthan2898 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good !!

  • @wilfridokorie360
    @wilfridokorie360 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would like to know if this is Engineering Thermodynamics or not

  • @blexiahbaddest1733
    @blexiahbaddest1733 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank u

  • @adharshbratlin4743
    @adharshbratlin4743 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you 🇮🇳

  • @randomthing808
    @randomthing808 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But like what is tThermal Equilibrium

  • @sameeramaweekubura8068
    @sameeramaweekubura8068 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Much love from ♿

  • @Riyuihein
    @Riyuihein 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Admit it , you are one day here before exams 💀

    • @prishasmusicalvlogs7292
      @prishasmusicalvlogs7292 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah same 😂 one night before exams

    • @Riyuihein
      @Riyuihein 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@prishasmusicalvlogs7292 🫡 all the best

  • @mihirvarsat4529
    @mihirvarsat4529 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    why it's called zeroth law of thermodynamic , why zero not three or four ???

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      well it was formulated after the other three, but it is kind of more fundamental than the others in certain ways, so they decided to just call it the zeroth law.

  • @clarissaaudreyhenry5360
    @clarissaaudreyhenry5360 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi

  • @utcher8910
    @utcher8910 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Put the video in 1.75X 😆😆😂

  • @StillElias
    @StillElias ปีที่แล้ว

    A tautology if I've ever hear one

  • @mariyamsdv9222
    @mariyamsdv9222 ปีที่แล้ว

    ill sum it up, it says that if an objecct i in thermal equilibtiom with each other it would be in thermal equilibrium witth each other lol

  • @kimj1464
    @kimj1464 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank u thermodynamics jesus

  • @gauravk7738
    @gauravk7738 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    the jesus himself taught me thermodynamics today, thanks for saving me from tomorrow's test lord 😭

  • @aakifbhat1955
    @aakifbhat1955 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love you 😙😙😙😙😙😙

  • @sachindas4351
    @sachindas4351 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    He look alike Ranbir Kapoor with long hair and Beard :)

  • @zicada7661
    @zicada7661 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "Level of desired knowledge" eh? What's the maximum level Professor Dave ?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Maximum level of what, knowledge? I don't think anyone could answer that, maybe ever.

    • @zicada7661
      @zicada7661 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains Maximum level of desired knowledge. If people have different levels of desired knowledge, that's just a fancy way of saying some people dont't care about learning that much, while other's want to learn as much as possible. Shouldn't you try to encourage everyone to desire as high a level of knowledge as possible as an educator ?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Certainly, but there are so many fields. Take me for example. As a generalist, I try to learn as many subjects as possible. That means I don't go very deep into any of them, except maybe chemistry since that's my background. I have only a basic working knowledge of physics, biology, etc. It's unrealistic to expect the common public to all get PhDs in a scientific field, so I try to demarcate what should be accessible and desirable to the public, and encourage them to learn at least that.

    • @zicada7661
      @zicada7661 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains Right, but there is no down-side to having a maximum desired level of knowledge of all fields. It will always come down to priorities of course, but all the great scientists in history shared a desire to learn as much as possible, about as many things as possible, thinking every new piece of information fit into a grand puzzle, with each completed piece revealing the final picture.

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      For sure. Honestly, I don't know the context of what you were originally referring to, so I'm not even sure what I initially said. In general, more science knowledge = good.

  • @rajendrapal9567
    @rajendrapal9567 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tomorrow my exam 🤪

    • @euber4784
      @euber4784 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How's your exam?

  • @jessicatang185
    @jessicatang185 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Diathermal. Adiabatic

  • @user-ih5vi8dx3b
    @user-ih5vi8dx3b 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    mewing while watching this for test

  • @mukthang9215
    @mukthang9215 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    2022

  • @amanrubey
    @amanrubey 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    nice music

  • @ExtantFrodo2
    @ExtantFrodo2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Question: Does it take more energy to copy version A of a mutation or to copy version B? Child & sibling.
    If one has a beneficial affect & the other does not, which one will more likely get passed on to the next generation?
    There is zero thermodynamic difference between copying one offspring or another. One may be a better survivor or more attractive mate than the other due to a mutation or recombination of genes. There is nothing but extinction to stop the accumulation of beneficial new genes. Thus evolution has to happen & does not violate the 2nd law.
    It's lion's expending the least energy that leads to predominantly culling the slow deer that jacks up the population of faster deer.
    It's the predator not using more energy than needed that is satisfied with the easy to see prey that leaves the camouflaged ones to breed their tricks.

    • @LiveFreeOrDie2A
      @LiveFreeOrDie2A 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There’s no such thing as “beneficial new genes”. There are only beneficial mutations, as a result of switching on/off already existing genes in a species. There is no accumulation of NEW genes! Only new variations and new mutations. And almost ALL of the “beneficial” mutations are a result of turning OFF, not on, already EXISTING genes.

  • @mdsahazalal3067
    @mdsahazalal3067 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🔝

  • @NattywawaCome-jj6mi
    @NattywawaCome-jj6mi 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    𝐕𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐲 𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐳𝐢𝐧𝐠!!!!

  • @user-cg8gc3mx6d
    @user-cg8gc3mx6d 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    thank you jesus

  • @nixtoshi
    @nixtoshi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seems like a dumb law, you are basically saying that if 3 objects close to each other are at the same temperature, they are all at the same temperature ._.
    The "diathermal and adiabatic" concepts make more sense, but the vocabulary could have been simplified to "heat exchange capacity" or HXC, some elements have high HXC, other have low HXC and no element has 0 HXC.
    Instead of using such weird vocabulary as "diathermal and adiabatic" which really convey little information about how MUCH they are able to conduct heat.

  • @Ksingh..09
    @Ksingh..09 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sir u looks anant ambani

  • @xBobz99
    @xBobz99 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wouldn't the universe technically be an adiabatic system then? :P

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      interesting point! i'm not sure if physicists consider the universe as such but it certainly would make sense.

    • @valarmorghulis6462
      @valarmorghulis6462 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Professor Dave Explains yes they do 😊 it is indeed considered as an isolated system, therefore an adiabatic one

  • @RA-pu9jo
    @RA-pu9jo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    no it doesent !! earf is FLAT..... F. A. L. T.

  • @carlorozzi6916
    @carlorozzi6916 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    BTW, you are a bit of a cross between Dave Grohl and Einstein. Grohlstein

  • @kaxtorplose
    @kaxtorplose 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Read any Asimov lately?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      when i was a kid a little bit

    • @kaxtorplose
      @kaxtorplose 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains Just a little bit?
      Good Lord man, are you saying that you haven't read the entirety of Asimovs' Foundation series? The content of which, I realize now, begs the question -
      Which came first, the zeroth law of thermodynamics, or the zeroth law of robotics?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Haha no I didn't read that one all the way through, I stuck to the short stories. Too busy to read lots of books. But I saw that Apple has the TV series coming so that should be fun.

    • @kaxtorplose
      @kaxtorplose 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains Wow. No time to read science fiction? Ok, seems a bit odd to me though.
      Along with the three laws of robotics which are hardwired into every robot's positronic brain, Giskard and Daniel, two robots, came up with a new law of robotics, the zeroth law, whenever it became clear that an individual human was posing a grave danger to the existence of humanity.
      The zeroth law of Robotics - A robot cannot harm humanity, or through inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.
      The first law of Robotics - a robot cannot harm a human being, or through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
      Second law of robotics - a robot cannot harm a human being, or through inaction, allow a human being to be injured.
      Third law of robotics - a robot cannot harm a human being, or through inaction, allow a human being to harm another human being.
      Paraphrased. The Robots of Dawn by Isaac Azimov.
      The zeroth law was invented by the humaniform robot Daneel Olivaw, and his friend, a more traditional robot, Giskard. Giskard seized and became non-functional while inacting the zeroth law of robotics, by killing a human who was in the position to cause humanity grave harm. Daneel did not intervene, and survived because he was more advanced.
      The last words of the novel are heartbreaking.
      Daneel: Recover, friend Giskard, Recover! What you did was right by the zeroth law!
      Giskard: But I will... never know... if... the zeroth law... will... ev... er... be...
      And Giskard freezes, and dies, leaving Daneel alone to care for the human race over the next 10,000 years.

    • @kaxtorplose
      @kaxtorplose 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains As far as the Apple TV series goes, people have been trying to make Foundation, or The Foundation Trilogy into a movie for half a century! And it doesn't just end with the trilogy, there's an entire series including two prequels - prelude to foundation and forward the foundation, plus all three robot novels that precede foundation, then foundation, foundation and empire, second foundation, foundations end, and foundation and Earth! That's a sprawling series! I don't really have any high hopes of it being done well on the screen.
      Well, if they're finally going to do it, I better reread my Asimov, so that I can nitpick the hell out of it!