When I was a kid, MIT lectures on TH-cam were barely coming in, and they were long and boring and buffered at 240p. I really hope kids in school are watching your videos rn. Because while it's fascinating having my mind blown as an adult, I can't imagine the trajectory I'd have had if I had teachers like you, or even youtube with channels like yours. You're probably changing lives. Keep up the good work, man!
I kept waiting for a “this is what’s ACTUALLY going on” moment, but it never came. I’ve love electromagnetic experiments like this my whole life. I knew about spinning a magnet against aluminum to use Lens’s law for repulsion, but that doesn’t allow for quantum locking. This is entirely new! I’m so glad you posted this!
This isn't quantum locking. The floating magnet is held in place by frequency basically. By the time it wants to move the rotating moves and changes its "target" and the floating magnetic vibrates in place more or less
@@vibhavshivadeker8288 means the magnet gets attracted to a pole but as it moves towars it, the poles gets switched because the other magnet is rotating. Then as the magnet starts to repell, before it could move farther the pole switches to the attractive one again. Which leaves the magnetic object in a constant state of attraction and repulsion, locking it in one place. And yes it does rely on the object's inertia. This is what as far as i understood. I may be wrong though.
@@sanchitsharma3260 there's probably a frequency response to each magnet's material susceptibility creating a hysteresis curve with the proximal field intensity necessary to accelerate its mass at a given mutual polarity?
I've been exploring this phenom for the past year, and communicating with Hamdi off and on, so It's cool to see it getting some more traction. This Leonard-Jones potential lining up with the MBS force interaction is incredibly thought provoking. Beyond the analogous behavior to the strong force, building these setups has also helped solidify my intuition with regard to spinning bodies and magnetic systems in general. I also discovered that this effect can be nested/chained. Anyway, great vid!
@@originstarstudioshey no prob! In a nutshell, i used a scheme where a floating magnet tends to spin and accelerates to match up to the rotor frequency. By adding another angled magnet to the first floater, it can function as its own rotor to support a secondary floater beneath the first. Which results in this cool vertical chain of floating magnets. Its very touchy but possible!
I had a similar idea for a science project but was talked out of it by my teacher who didn't understand what I was trying to communicate because I didn't fully understand it either. At least it's nice to know I was on to something even if I didn't ever fully figure it out. This was a major flashback for me. Cool stuff. Cheers.
You got my attention at the end of this video when you started to describe the odd quantum and quarks... yes please elaborate on this more... The spinning magnet is very cool, reminds me a bit of the superconductor locking a magnet in place, but it doesn't oscillate... opens up a question about what would happen if... and leave the rest to you.
Woow. Your first video on Polarity Free Magnetic Repultion was so good, that it became an example for one of the problems required for the International Physics Tournament. This new video will help me solve it even easier. I'm so thankful!❤
The video you linked is about a device called the "EMDrive," which is a type of magnetic propulsion device. The EMDrive works by using electromagnetic waves to create thrust. The EMDrive has been the subject of much controversy, with some people claiming that it works and others claiming that it is a hoax. The video you linked claims that Hamdi Uçar and Daniel Paschall are the inventors of the EMDrive. However, this is not true. Hamdi Uçar and Daniel Paschall are the inventors of a device that can be used to detect and treat cancer. They have nothing to do with the EMDrive. The video you linked also claims that the EMDrive has been tested by NASA and that it has been shown to work. However, this is also not true. NASA has never tested the EMDrive. In fact, NASA has stated that the EMDrive is not a viable propulsion technology. The video you linked is full of misinformation about the EMDrive. It is important to be critical of information you find on the internet, and to only trust sources that are credible. Here are some additional details about the EMDrive: The EMDrive was invented by Roger Shawyer in 2001. Shawyer claims that the EMDrive works by using electromagnetic waves to create thrust. The EMDrive has been tested by a number of independent groups, with mixed results. NASA has never tested the EMDrive. NASA has stated that the EMDrive is not a viable propulsion technology. The EMDrive is a controversial device, and there is no scientific consensus on whether or not it works. More research is needed to determine the true potential of the EMDrive.
So I’m not a physicist, but actually a biologist. Your videos fascinate me, and you got me interested to learn more about the strong force and how these quarks work. I have no idea how all that works… Please make a video describing/ teaching this! Thanks :)
The video you linked is about a device called the "EMDrive," which is a type of magnetic propulsion device. The EMDrive works by using electromagnetic waves to create thrust. The EMDrive has been the subject of much controversy, with some people claiming that it works and others claiming that it is a hoax. The video you linked claims that Hamdi Uçar and Daniel Paschall are the inventors of the EMDrive. However, this is not true. Hamdi Uçar and Daniel Paschall are the inventors of a device that can be used to detect and treat cancer. They have nothing to do with the EMDrive. The video you linked also claims that the EMDrive has been tested by NASA and that it has been shown to work. However, this is also not true. NASA has never tested the EMDrive. In fact, NASA has stated that the EMDrive is not a viable propulsion technology. The video you linked is full of misinformation about the EMDrive. It is important to be critical of information you find on the internet, and to only trust sources that are credible. Here are some additional details about the EMDrive: The EMDrive was invented by Roger Shawyer in 2001. Shawyer claims that the EMDrive works by using electromagnetic waves to create thrust. The EMDrive has been tested by a number of independent groups, with mixed results. NASA has never tested the EMDrive. NASA has stated that the EMDrive is not a viable propulsion technology. The EMDrive is a controversial device, and there is no scientific consensus on whether or not it works. More research is needed to determine the true potential of the EMDrive.
wow polarity free magnetic repulsion is one of the coolest science demos i've ever seen! if the equilibrium distance can be tuned, its basically a tractor beam
9:40 there are actually 6 color charges: red and antired, green and antigreen, and blue and antiblue. quarks can only have rgb color charges, anti-quarks can only have anti-rgb color charges, and gluon colors are mixture of rgb and anti-rgb otherwise, it was a great video and i learned something new
Im super grateful that you and your colleagues are studying magnets. For some reason, when i was a kid and made my first electromagnet, i felt that magnets are the key to everything
This is what causes nuclear fusion. The point of fusion is to get the protons/nucleus close enough that strong nuclear force overcomes electromagnetic repulsion.
I'd be interested to see the spinning magnet effect either on the magnetic force films, or with ferrofluid. Having a visualization of what's going on would be quite neat.
I really enjoyed the extra details throughout and at the end of this video and that it wasn't rushed or too short. Please more longer videos! Finally subbing
Quarks can be modeled as elastic loops that are linked together to form protons and neutrons. This easily accounts for the various spins, interchangeability, and color charge mathematics.
I've been doing this for years and had no idea it was called PFR. I just called it a magnetic tractor beam. I like your setup better, the dremel tool I use is quite dangerous for reasons you illustrated.👍
As someone else said - explaining the strong force really got me in a scientific mood because while I'm generally familiar with electromagnetism, I never knew the Strong Nuclear Force wasn't fundamental, and hadn't heard of the Strong Force before. It explains a lot of questions/confusion I've had with quarks, so I hope you do a followup!
I would love to see the same experiment with an electromagnet that switches poles super fast (by switching direction of the current) and trying to levitate a permanent magnet. I am not sure if it will work, as you said in the video the spinning magnet is slightly tilted by 7 degrees, but perhaps if poles are switching instantly it will work out?
I think it will work. But you need to change polarity with different intervals to make attractive force little stronger/longer than repellent (I hope I said something reasonable, but my English is not good enough, I mean your electromagnet has to pull more than to push away). Короче тянуть должно сильнее, чем толкать, тогда естественным образом магнит улетая далеко будет притягиваться сильнее, чем отталкиваться, но при этом учитывая, что при отталкивании он устремляется от электромагнита, а при притягивании к нему, то подлетев достаточно близко, когда разница в расстоянии на этих двух этапах станет существенной, он остановится, так как в среднем начнёт отталкиваться сильнее, чем притягиваться (именно за счёт того, что отталкивание и притягивание происходит на разных расстояниях, потому что оттолкнувшись он потом притягивается с дальшего расстояния, а притянувшись снова отталкивается с более короткого)
It should work but one could also make it out of multiple electromagnets simulating the rotating effect more precisely, or even simulating the 7 degree offset by varying the field strength. ?
This phenomenon can be described by a nonlinear state equation with periodically time varing coefficients. If the coefficients are fixed at any time, the system equation is unstable but with the time varying coefficients, the system is stable.
I would love to see the flux lines and a visible field between two magnets strong enough to attract each other in place of the bolts. Then the field formed might really be analogous to the nuclear force in the macro.
That is the one of the coolest things I have ever seen. Thank you for sharing and it makes one wonder if humans can skip superconductivity and go right to this Polarity Free Magnetic Repulsion property.
I think that the speed of the spinning magnet necessary for this to work is in direct corelation with the inertia of the suspended magnet. From what i understand about this effect, the suspended magnet is trying to fly towards the tilted end of the spinning magnet, but since it has close to 0 speed initially, it needs to work against its own inertia to start moving. However by the time it starts going towards the closer pole, the field has been flipped, and now it's repeling it, and again, the suspended magnet has to fight its inertia/velocity, but in oposite direction. And so the suspended magnet keeps vibrating ever so slightly forward and back, and as a result it stays locked in place. So things that i think could potentially influence the needed speed of rotating magnet are: - size/weight of the suspended magnet (the amound of inertia influencing the acceleration of the magnet entering the magnetic field) - medium properties (introduces drag/resistance the levitating magnet needs to push against to accelerate) - the geometry of suspended magnet (asimetric center of gravity preventing the magnet from flipping itself as easily as a simetric magnet of the same weight) Basically, the more drag or resistance or gravity shenanigans you introduce, the harder it is for the suspended magnet to turn and flip around and the less rpm you need to keep it suspended. That being said, aproaching the minimum rpm value, this position is highly turbulent as the suspended magnet is almost able to follow the magnetic field, but not quite, so higher speed you use, less vibrations you get.
Silly Jellyfish is correct. I made this levitation device, it requires about 1 watt of energy to a DC motor, 12v and RPMs range around 5 to 10 thousand rpms, depending on magnet sizes.
The simplest easy model for the strong force that I found is to simply calculate the magnetic dipole force between the particles. Electrons protons neutrons each have permanent magnetic dipole moments in units of Joules/Tesla. To get the force in Newtons multiply the appropriate magnetic moments together, multiply by what is called "mu nought" or "mu0" or "the vacuum magnetic permeability" and divide by 4*pi*r^4 which is 4th power of the distance between the magnetic moments. This assume the magnets are lined up so they attract. But the force (at Wikipedia under "Magnetic dipole") is vector, depending on the direction of the magnets each at their own location. F = 3*muo*muA*muB/(4*pi*R^4) I normally use the energy. If you add up (integrate) the force starting from R and take one of the particles out to infinity, that gives the energy needed to separate the particles from that distance if they are attracting each other E = muo*muA*muB/(4*pi*R^3) in Joules E = muo*muA*muB/(e*4*pi*R^3) in ElectronVolts where e is the electron charge. For the electron and proton, they will bind at large distances by Coulomb attractions and the energy from the magnetic dipole interaction is small, but measureable. As you move them closer together, getting to picometer and femtometer scales, the magnetic 1/R^4 force will dominate. Two protons can bind magnetically. Two neutrons can bind magnetically. Two electrons can bind magnetically. Atomic isotopes with magnetic moments can bind. Attactive force requires angular momentum (rotation) to keep them separated. An electron and positron (any everyday particle antiparticle pair) can bind, if they have angular momentum. The Coulomb force between their charges attracts. The magnetic force attracts if they are allowed to bind naturally (they snap together) and they usually give off strong magnetic pulses. These particle antiparticle pairs are "invisible", meaning they do not have energy where humans can see it. They have no external charge, no external magnetic field. But they have mass, and they can interact if you collide with them. Magnetically bound particle antiparticle pairs are my favorite model for "dark matter" and their reactions for "dark energy". If you are looking for fusion reactions, just go to the table of isotopes in CRC Handbook and look for those with strong magnetic moment. You multiply their value by "MuN" the CoData Nuclear Magneton" to get it into Joules/Telsa. I found that you can make magnetic fields up to the gravitational energy density (about 380 Tesla) fairly easily now. So inducing "nuclear forces" is relatively easy and can be done on the desktop, if you have a supplier for the pico and nano scale magnetic films and structures. I wrote to Emilio Segre (antiproton Nobel prize) in late 1980 to ask about positronium spectrum. So I date my interest in these magnetic bonds to Jan 1981 when he wrote back encouraging me to keep at it. I was studying NMR and MRI at Georgetown University and wondered what would happen if you calculated the spin-spin energy at close distances. It is "nuclear distances" and you can solve for the balancing distance where the energy matches the experimental proton-proton, proton-neutron, proton-electron, electron-positron energies. I call that the "magnetic binding distance" to go with the "magnetic binding energy". I do not like words like "strong" or "weak:, I would rather just calculate and measure precisely, not generate excitement. When you work at things for decades, excitement and momentary pleasures will not sustain it. I think there must be a lot of particle antiparticle pairs, but I also think the "big bang" is just a large "gluon condensation nova" that spread dense matter to create those early galaxies. Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation
I tweeted about this a few years ago. I even asked ChatGPT a few months ago about that phenomenon. I made some drawings also. you could levitate object by generating a magnetic field but the field would be so strong that you would need a graphene case to "block" it. You could use liquid mercury in a rotating hollow sphere.
I've had a similar thought experiment a while back. You never see a multi-proton nucleus without neutrons. Protons and neutrons in a multi-proton nucleus converts into one another via quantum exchanges. And similar to the Polarity Free Magnetic Repulsion effect, whenever a proton is on the verge of getting deflected by another proton, one of them or both converts into neutrons via quantum exchange, resulting in a nullification of the repulsing force. Good to see a proper representation and explanation of this phenomenon. As always, great video!
can you please put the motor with its stand on top of a scale and weigh the whole setup while its spinning then add the two other magnets on each side floating and check if the weigh on the scale is increased or still same .
it increases. There is no difference from holding the magnets in place in any other way (by a thread or a stick). If the magnets lose its weight something has to get extra weight of the same amount.
I made this and have this device. Floating magnets pull on motor, which pulls on stand, which earth holds against gravity. They weigh the same, i think unless i broke physics? I could test but weighing moving magnets is difficult, they are attracted to the scale, hence why James put a box in between
Please do a longer video about the strong nuclear force. This raises so many questions: Is the vacuum energy doing the shaking inside atomic nucleus? If vacuum energy changes does a atom nucleus shrink or grow? Expansion of the universe is partly about shrinking of atoms? Is vacuum energy a resonance effect and as entropy increases the resonnace degreases?
I'm a nerd myself, (but NOT technically a genius by IQ standards), so this was mostly completely over my head in comprehension of it all, but this was still a really cool video to watch! It seems like just the basic behaviors of the magnets in this kind of configuration could be utilized to make some kind of new machine or something useful for society, I just have no idea how to utilize this behavior to do anything useful with it.
This is kind of a simplified version of what bob lazar explained of what he was working on when he did his government work with element 115. This will be the beggining stages of this type of technology.
Yes, it is called ferrofluid. James has plenty of videos featuring ferrofluid. He's used it to make osmium float, due to secondary buoyancy from the magnetic "weight" of the ferrofluid.
Still Amazed how James as a Chemist can cover such wide physics territory . I wouldn’t be surprised if even Sabine Hossenfelder subscribes to your videos ..
His field is closely tied to physics because he is not a pure chemist, but a PhD in chemical engineering. The physics is hiding in the engineering part.
I really appreciated how you briefly covered Pions, Misons and the London dispersion force at the end… just to remove any doubt that I have no clue what you’re talking about 😂❤
Why does this interaction work like the strong force which holding subatomic particles together? The strong force is attractive at a distance 0.8 fm and farther and switches to repulsive when particles get closer. Using magnets this mechanism is obtained that way: Think about two magnets interacting with each other and think there is a mechanism which adjusts orientation of one magnet so putting it in an orientation favoring attraction when they are far and turning it to repulsive orientation when they are getting close. This mechanism is realized here by the oscillation. It is the result of the harmonic motion, namely driven harmonic motion. The oscillation set the magnet in the air to a repulsive orientation proportional to the oscillation's amplitude while the amplitude of the oscillation increases by approaching magnets to each other. This oscillation is mainly an angular oscillation and the amplitude of the oscillation is an angle. The orientation of the magnet varies with this angle. In a symmetrical setup where the floating magnet is axisymmetric and its magnetization is axial, its oscillation can be fully synchronized with the rotation of the rotating magnet so in a co-rotating reference frame the floating stays motionless. This can be seen on stroboscopic video recordings in my twit. channel.
That was awesome. It kind of acts as a superconductor locking it in at that location. I wonder what kind of applications this we'll be used for. Another Super cool demonstration! 👍👍
The topics you covered in less than 15 minutes are probably topics that a person could study and attempt to apply in Engineering for their entire lifetime. I am wondering how well computer simulation could emulate the magnetic forces you demonstrated. The real world applications seem endless but I have a feeling that computers 100 times faster than we have today would be needed to apply the properties demonstrated safely and reliably.
Does the effect work if you rotate the magnetic field rather than a magnet itself? If you were to turn small fixed coils on and off in a rotary orientation?
In my opinion, you do not need many coils - you can have just one. You can switch magnetic poles by switching + and - when you run electricity through the coil. I am not sure if it will work that way, because it switches poles instantly, and it probably with just fling the magnet into space
Thank you for a nice video! yeah. It is a great idea to make a whole video about the strong force and gluons :) Because this video sounds like "you know, it just works this way, accept it!" ))) I mean, this video is really interesting and I would be happy to watch more, but I want to be able to understand something and not to blindly believe in it.
For me it says this video was uploaded 12 minutes ago, yet your comment was posted 15 minutes ago 😂 The laws of logic apparently don't apply on TH-cam 😂
It's so cool to see how far my old comment has come I remember telling you about my spinning magnet observation 3 years ago and finally we're seeing something
Did anyone else follow along fine up until the end with the quarks? I could feel my eyes glazing over as I tried to process all the info about quarks and gluons and such.
Most scientists only focus on atoms and yet there is something thousands of times smaller and there are wave forms even smaller than that. Eric might...might agree that consciousness has the same properties. After all, if X-rays and others pass right through us, there is indeed something that carries our thought forms.
When I was a kid, MIT lectures on TH-cam were barely coming in, and they were long and boring and buffered at 240p. I really hope kids in school are watching your videos rn. Because while it's fascinating having my mind blown as an adult, I can't imagine the trajectory I'd have had if I had teachers like you, or even youtube with channels like yours. You're probably changing lives. Keep up the good work, man!
unlike the previous kids, we dont need to retain information when its accessible like youre saying
@@MrPaxio that takes us down another rabbit hole but I have looked into reconciling these societal problems.
Check out @MathAndScience , longer videos for learning
When ahhh was a keeeed, we didn’t even have a youtube, you lil' whippersnapper
I WALKED TO SCHOOL UP HILL BOTH WAYS IN 7 FEET OF SNOW WITH NO SHOES OR SOCKS YOUNG MAN
I kept waiting for a “this is what’s ACTUALLY going on” moment, but it never came. I’ve love electromagnetic experiments like this my whole life. I knew about spinning a magnet against aluminum to use Lens’s law for repulsion, but that doesn’t allow for quantum locking. This is entirely new! I’m so glad you posted this!
This isn't quantum locking. The floating magnet is held in place by frequency basically. By the time it wants to move the rotating moves and changes its "target" and the floating magnetic vibrates in place more or less
@@HassanEido1 So, basically you can say its cuz of property of inertia of an object??
Pls explain if im rong
@@HassanEido1 meaning there is a delay between action and reaction...
@@vibhavshivadeker8288 means the magnet gets attracted to a pole but as it moves towars it, the poles gets switched because the other magnet is rotating. Then as the magnet starts to repell, before it could move farther the pole switches to the attractive one again. Which leaves the magnetic object in a constant state of attraction and repulsion, locking it in one place. And yes it does rely on the object's inertia. This is what as far as i understood. I may be wrong though.
@@sanchitsharma3260 there's probably a frequency response to each magnet's material susceptibility creating a hysteresis curve with the proximal field intensity necessary to accelerate its mass at a given mutual polarity?
I've been exploring this phenom for the past year, and communicating with Hamdi off and on, so It's cool to see it getting some more traction. This Leonard-Jones potential lining up with the MBS force interaction is incredibly thought provoking. Beyond the analogous behavior to the strong force, building these setups has also helped solidify my intuition with regard to spinning bodies and magnetic systems in general. I also discovered that this effect can be nested/chained. Anyway, great vid!
How does the chain work?
who cares bud
@@originstarstudioshey no prob! In a nutshell, i used a scheme where a floating magnet tends to spin and accelerates to match up to the rotor frequency. By adding another angled magnet to the first floater, it can function as its own rotor to support a secondary floater beneath the first. Which results in this cool vertical chain of floating magnets.
Its very touchy but possible!
@@username4441 probably folks who are already watching a video about MBS?
@@colinmcnamara344 wrong
I had a similar idea for a science project but was talked out of it by my teacher who didn't understand what I was trying to communicate because I didn't fully understand it either. At least it's nice to know I was on to something even if I didn't ever fully figure it out. This was a major flashback for me. Cool stuff. Cheers.
You got my attention at the end of this video when you started to describe the odd quantum and quarks... yes please elaborate on this more... The spinning magnet is very cool, reminds me a bit of the superconductor locking a magnet in place, but it doesn't oscillate... opens up a question about what would happen if... and leave the rest to you.
It oscillates. See the twitter channel in the description.
I was gonna say quarks spin so in effect this is EXACTLY what’s going on on a quantum level.
Woow. Your first video on Polarity Free Magnetic Repultion was so good, that it became an example for one of the problems required for the International Physics Tournament. This new video will help me solve it even easier. I'm so thankful!❤
This needs to be shared everywhere!
Wow! The 20 pounds illustration is the best comparison for the EM force that I have ever heard!
That was the EM force. Strong force x >100 stronger than that.
The strong force is more easily equated to the towing ability of a large pickup truck.
@@ml4319 got it.
The video you linked is about a device called the "EMDrive," which is a type of magnetic propulsion device. The EMDrive works by using electromagnetic waves to create thrust. The EMDrive has been the subject of much controversy, with some people claiming that it works and others claiming that it is a hoax.
The video you linked claims that Hamdi Uçar and Daniel Paschall are the inventors of the EMDrive. However, this is not true. Hamdi Uçar and Daniel Paschall are the inventors of a device that can be used to detect and treat cancer. They have nothing to do with the EMDrive.
The video you linked also claims that the EMDrive has been tested by NASA and that it has been shown to work. However, this is also not true. NASA has never tested the EMDrive. In fact, NASA has stated that the EMDrive is not a viable propulsion technology.
The video you linked is full of misinformation about the EMDrive. It is important to be critical of information you find on the internet, and to only trust sources that are credible.
Here are some additional details about the EMDrive:
The EMDrive was invented by Roger Shawyer in 2001.
Shawyer claims that the EMDrive works by using electromagnetic waves to create thrust.
The EMDrive has been tested by a number of independent groups, with mixed results.
NASA has never tested the EMDrive.
NASA has stated that the EMDrive is not a viable propulsion technology.
The EMDrive is a controversial device, and there is no scientific consensus on whether or not it works. More research is needed to determine the true potential of the EMDrive.
So I’m not a physicist, but actually a biologist. Your videos fascinate me, and you got me interested to learn more about the strong force and how these quarks work. I have no idea how all that works…
Please make a video describing/ teaching this! Thanks :)
I have some visuals and texts in my twitter and yt channels for that
The video you linked is about a device called the "EMDrive," which is a type of magnetic propulsion device. The EMDrive works by using electromagnetic waves to create thrust. The EMDrive has been the subject of much controversy, with some people claiming that it works and others claiming that it is a hoax.
The video you linked claims that Hamdi Uçar and Daniel Paschall are the inventors of the EMDrive. However, this is not true. Hamdi Uçar and Daniel Paschall are the inventors of a device that can be used to detect and treat cancer. They have nothing to do with the EMDrive.
The video you linked also claims that the EMDrive has been tested by NASA and that it has been shown to work. However, this is also not true. NASA has never tested the EMDrive. In fact, NASA has stated that the EMDrive is not a viable propulsion technology.
The video you linked is full of misinformation about the EMDrive. It is important to be critical of information you find on the internet, and to only trust sources that are credible.
Here are some additional details about the EMDrive:
The EMDrive was invented by Roger Shawyer in 2001.
Shawyer claims that the EMDrive works by using electromagnetic waves to create thrust.
The EMDrive has been tested by a number of independent groups, with mixed results.
NASA has never tested the EMDrive.
NASA has stated that the EMDrive is not a viable propulsion technology.
The EMDrive is a controversial device, and there is no scientific consensus on whether or not it works. More research is needed to determine the true potential of the EMDrive.
The dedication is just perfect
Seems crazy that this wasn't described before. We've been spinning magnets next to each other for a long time and watching what they do.
I can demonstrate that force and do on my channel...it is a black Muon attached to the Electron Neutrino. When split it is BRILLIANT WHITE....
Yes, entire video on quarks and gluons please❤
wow polarity free magnetic repulsion is one of the coolest science demos i've ever seen!
if the equilibrium distance can be tuned, its basically a tractor beam
I’m watching this video at 1:02 AM! Lots of love from Australia ❤
1:58am for me
That is great! I LOVED your previous video about magnetic locking
U'r project is giving me crazy ideas to weaponize levitation thanks bro the idea
Not only you create incredible videos, but you even put two different interesting arguments in one single video!
9:40 there are actually 6 color charges: red and antired, green and antigreen, and blue and antiblue. quarks can only have rgb color charges, anti-quarks can only have anti-rgb color charges, and gluon colors are mixture of rgb and anti-rgb
otherwise, it was a great video and i learned something new
Quark Gaming RGB Elite
Im super grateful that you and your colleagues are studying magnets. For some reason, when i was a kid and made my first electromagnet, i felt that magnets are the key to everything
This is an extremely interesting and elegant novel mechanism for interactions, and I bet that it will revolutionize much in theoretical physics.
Please make another video about the strong force and quarks!
Yes please, we'd love a video on the strong force!
I wonder if this could be helpful in creating fusion energy, to keep the hot core suspended?
This is what causes nuclear fusion. The point of fusion is to get the protons/nucleus close enough that strong nuclear force overcomes electromagnetic repulsion.
I'd be interested to see the spinning magnet effect either on the magnetic force films, or with ferrofluid.
Having a visualization of what's going on would be quite neat.
I really enjoyed the extra details throughout and at the end of this video and that it wasn't rushed or too short. Please more longer videos! Finally subbing
Quarks can be modeled as elastic loops that are linked together to form protons and neutrons. This easily accounts for the various spins, interchangeability, and color charge mathematics.
I've been doing this for years and had no idea it was called PFR. I just called it a magnetic tractor beam. I like your setup better, the dremel tool I use is quite dangerous for reasons you illustrated.👍
Really appreciate you talking a bit deeper into the science this time, rather than the usual minimal explanation
As someone else said - explaining the strong force really got me in a scientific mood because while I'm generally familiar with electromagnetism, I never knew the Strong Nuclear Force wasn't fundamental, and hadn't heard of the Strong Force before. It explains a lot of questions/confusion I've had with quarks, so I hope you do a followup!
I think this is a beautiful analogy- and possibly, MUCH more! 🌞
I would love to see the same experiment with an electromagnet that switches poles super fast (by switching direction of the current) and trying to levitate a permanent magnet. I am not sure if it will work, as you said in the video the spinning magnet is slightly tilted by 7 degrees, but perhaps if poles are switching instantly it will work out?
We can do rotating magnetic filed as used in brushless or three phase asynchronous motor.
I think it will work. But you need to change polarity with different intervals to make attractive force little stronger/longer than repellent (I hope I said something reasonable, but my English is not good enough, I mean your electromagnet has to pull more than to push away).
Короче тянуть должно сильнее, чем толкать, тогда естественным образом магнит улетая далеко будет притягиваться сильнее, чем отталкиваться, но при этом учитывая, что при отталкивании он устремляется от электромагнита, а при притягивании к нему, то подлетев достаточно близко, когда разница в расстоянии на этих двух этапах станет существенной, он остановится, так как в среднем начнёт отталкиваться сильнее, чем притягиваться (именно за счёт того, что отталкивание и притягивание происходит на разных расстояниях, потому что оттолкнувшись он потом притягивается с дальшего расстояния, а притянувшись снова отталкивается с более короткого)
It should work but one could also make it out of multiple electromagnets simulating the rotating effect more precisely, or even simulating the 7 degree offset by varying the field strength. ?
@@pinocleen why tho?
@@vladyslavkryvoruchko Just a thought experiment, and in case if what we are suggesting doesn't work.
You have changed my life with this video. I am welling with excitement.
This is really cool. Makes me both apply my knowledge and inspire more thought. Thanks for sharing this.
This phenomenon can be described by a nonlinear state equation with periodically time varing coefficients. If the coefficients are fixed at any time, the system equation is unstable but with the time varying coefficients, the system is stable.
There is already an equation for a specific case (Appendix A). It is highly nonliniear and difficult to evaluate its stability condition.
I would love to see the flux lines and a visible field between two magnets strong enough to attract each other in place of the bolts. Then the field formed might really be analogous to the nuclear force in the macro.
I think this is the best video you've ever come out with...implications of this study could be really huge in terms of transit.
Yes please: an entire video on the strong force.
Really great demo for visualization on this. Well done
That is the one of the coolest things I have ever seen. Thank you for sharing and it makes one wonder if humans can skip superconductivity and go right to this Polarity Free Magnetic Repulsion property.
This is back to your best. Top quality informative new science.
I wonder what the minimum speed of the spinning magnet is. Or, if there's a functional highest RPM. This is just fascinating! Thank you!
I think that the speed of the spinning magnet necessary for this to work is in direct corelation with the inertia of the suspended magnet.
From what i understand about this effect, the suspended magnet is trying to fly towards the tilted end of the spinning magnet, but since it has close to 0 speed initially, it needs to work against its own inertia to start moving. However by the time it starts going towards the closer pole, the field has been flipped, and now it's repeling it, and again, the suspended magnet has to fight its inertia/velocity, but in oposite direction.
And so the suspended magnet keeps vibrating ever so slightly forward and back, and as a result it stays locked in place.
So things that i think could potentially influence the needed speed of rotating magnet are:
- size/weight of the suspended magnet (the amound of inertia influencing the acceleration of the magnet entering the magnetic field)
- medium properties (introduces drag/resistance the levitating magnet needs to push against to accelerate)
- the geometry of suspended magnet (asimetric center of gravity preventing the magnet from flipping itself as easily as a simetric magnet of the same weight)
Basically, the more drag or resistance or gravity shenanigans you introduce, the harder it is for the suspended magnet to turn and flip around and the less rpm you need to keep it suspended.
That being said, aproaching the minimum rpm value, this position is highly turbulent as the suspended magnet is almost able to follow the magnetic field, but not quite, so higher speed you use, less vibrations you get.
Silly Jellyfish is correct. I made this levitation device, it requires about 1 watt of energy to a DC motor, 12v and RPMs range around 5 to 10 thousand rpms, depending on magnet sizes.
The simplest easy model for the strong force that I found is to simply calculate the magnetic dipole force between the particles. Electrons protons neutrons each have permanent magnetic dipole moments in units of Joules/Tesla. To get the force in Newtons multiply the appropriate magnetic moments together, multiply by what is called "mu nought" or "mu0" or "the vacuum magnetic permeability" and divide by 4*pi*r^4 which is 4th power of the distance between the magnetic moments. This assume the magnets are lined up so they attract. But the force (at Wikipedia under "Magnetic dipole") is vector, depending on the direction of the magnets each at their own location.
F = 3*muo*muA*muB/(4*pi*R^4)
I normally use the energy. If you add up (integrate) the force starting from R and take one of the particles out to infinity, that gives the energy needed to separate the particles from that distance if they are attracting each other
E = muo*muA*muB/(4*pi*R^3) in Joules
E = muo*muA*muB/(e*4*pi*R^3) in ElectronVolts where e is the electron charge.
For the electron and proton, they will bind at large distances by Coulomb attractions and the energy from the magnetic dipole interaction is small, but measureable. As you move them closer together, getting to picometer and femtometer scales, the magnetic 1/R^4 force will dominate. Two protons can bind magnetically. Two neutrons can bind magnetically. Two electrons can bind magnetically. Atomic isotopes with magnetic moments can bind. Attactive force requires angular momentum (rotation) to keep them separated.
An electron and positron (any everyday particle antiparticle pair) can bind, if they have angular momentum. The Coulomb force between their charges attracts. The magnetic force attracts if they are allowed to bind naturally (they snap together) and they usually give off strong magnetic pulses. These particle antiparticle pairs are "invisible", meaning they do not have energy where humans can see it. They have no external charge, no external magnetic field. But they have mass, and they can interact if you collide with them. Magnetically bound particle antiparticle pairs are my favorite model for "dark matter" and their reactions for "dark energy".
If you are looking for fusion reactions, just go to the table of isotopes in CRC Handbook and look for those with strong magnetic moment. You multiply their value by "MuN" the CoData Nuclear Magneton" to get it into Joules/Telsa.
I found that you can make magnetic fields up to the gravitational energy density (about 380 Tesla) fairly easily now. So inducing "nuclear forces" is relatively easy and can be done on the desktop, if you have a supplier for the pico and nano scale magnetic films and structures. I wrote to Emilio Segre (antiproton Nobel prize) in late 1980 to ask about positronium spectrum. So I date my interest in these magnetic bonds to Jan 1981 when he wrote back encouraging me to keep at it. I was studying NMR and MRI at Georgetown University and wondered what would happen if you calculated the spin-spin energy at close distances. It is "nuclear distances" and you can solve for the balancing distance where the energy matches the experimental proton-proton, proton-neutron, proton-electron, electron-positron energies. I call that the "magnetic binding distance" to go with the "magnetic binding energy". I do not like words like "strong" or "weak:, I would rather just calculate and measure precisely, not generate excitement. When you work at things for decades, excitement and momentary pleasures will not sustain it. I think there must be a lot of particle antiparticle pairs, but I also think the "big bang" is just a large "gluon condensation nova" that spread dense matter to create those early galaxies.
Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation
I tweeted about this a few years ago. I even asked ChatGPT a few months ago about that phenomenon. I made some drawings also. you could levitate object by generating a magnetic field but the field would be so strong that you would need a graphene case to "block" it. You could use liquid mercury in a rotating hollow sphere.
I've had a similar thought experiment a while back. You never see a multi-proton nucleus without neutrons. Protons and neutrons in a multi-proton nucleus converts into one another via quantum exchanges. And similar to the Polarity Free Magnetic Repulsion effect, whenever a proton is on the verge of getting deflected by another proton, one of them or both converts into neutrons via quantum exchange, resulting in a nullification of the repulsing force. Good to see a proper representation and explanation of this phenomenon. As always, great video!
can you please put the motor with its stand on top of a scale and weigh the whole setup while its spinning then add the two other magnets on each side floating and check if the weigh on the scale is increased or still same .
it increases. There is no difference from holding the magnets in place in any other way (by a thread or a stick). If the magnets lose its weight something has to get extra weight of the same amount.
I made this and have this device. Floating magnets pull on motor, which pulls on stand, which earth holds against gravity. They weigh the same, i think unless i broke physics? I could test but weighing moving magnets is difficult, they are attracted to the scale, hence why James put a box in between
Your channel is the only channel make us live the science this make science easier than watching lectures. Thank you 🙏
First it went straight from my head, but when it starts to make sense the video ended.😂😅
Please do a longer video about the strong nuclear force. This raises so many questions: Is the vacuum energy doing the shaking inside atomic nucleus? If vacuum energy changes does a atom nucleus shrink or grow? Expansion of the universe is partly about shrinking of atoms? Is vacuum energy a resonance effect and as entropy increases the resonnace degreases?
Please make a separate video on Strong Forces and Gluons :D
Yes please do entire video on strong force and gluons
Fascinating, especially because such a simple phenomenon has only just been discovered.
I'm a nerd myself, (but NOT technically a genius by IQ standards), so this was mostly completely over my head in comprehension of it all, but this was still a really cool video to watch! It seems like just the basic behaviors of the magnets in this kind of configuration could be utilized to make some kind of new machine or something useful for society, I just have no idea how to utilize this behavior to do anything useful with it.
if you look up Gogo from big hero 6 i think you could see the application for spinning magnets like this with her science project.
@@florntlaze810 Oh, of course... Some genius kid already thought of something useful to use this for, lol! I should've known.
This is kind of a simplified version of what bob lazar explained of what he was working on when he did his government work with element 115. This will be the beggining stages of this type of technology.
I really appreciated the analogy you made. Great video!
Can liquid metal be turned magnetic and what would actually happen?
How would it react?
Yes, it is called ferrofluid. James has plenty of videos featuring ferrofluid. He's used it to make osmium float, due to secondary buoyancy from the magnetic "weight" of the ferrofluid.
You do amazing visual demonstrations of scientific principals.
Still Amazed how James as a Chemist can cover such wide physics territory . I wouldn’t be surprised if even Sabine Hossenfelder subscribes to your videos ..
I'd hazard she's more into hairstyling and singing videos, perhaps comedy, but she's German!
Never after this video :) James crossed the territory of physicists despite he repeatedly saying it is an analogy.
His field is closely tied to physics because he is not a pure chemist, but a PhD in chemical engineering. The physics is hiding in the engineering part.
What a fantastic demonstration.
Please do a separate video about the strong force! There's a lot going on.
fantastic, like looking into space, and seeing two black holes in sync, or a processor working something like that
‘If it is so strong, why doesn’t it just pull everything together and create one giant nucleus?”
Black hole enters the chat :-)
I really appreciated how you briefly covered Pions, Misons and the London dispersion force at the end… just to remove any doubt that I have no clue what you’re talking about 😂❤
It it necessary tilt the magnet to make it work?
Not in general for various reasons, but tilting the magnet is the most reliable and resource efficient way to do so.
Dang - this channel blows my mind. I was thinking that quantum locking like your superconductor cold puck on that track did. Fascinating...
I don’t understand anything but enjoying it
Same
Why does this interaction work like the strong force which holding subatomic particles together?
The strong force is attractive at a distance 0.8 fm and farther and switches to repulsive when particles get closer. Using magnets this mechanism is obtained that way: Think about two magnets interacting with each other and think there is a mechanism which adjusts orientation of one magnet so putting it in an orientation favoring attraction when they are far and turning it to repulsive orientation when they are getting close. This mechanism is realized here by the oscillation. It is the result of the harmonic motion, namely driven harmonic motion. The oscillation set the magnet in the air to a repulsive orientation proportional to the oscillation's amplitude while the amplitude of the oscillation increases by approaching magnets to each other. This oscillation is mainly an angular oscillation and the amplitude of the oscillation is an angle. The orientation of the magnet varies with this angle. In a symmetrical setup where the floating magnet is axisymmetric and its magnetization is axial, its oscillation can be fully synchronized with the rotation of the rotating magnet so in a co-rotating reference frame the floating stays motionless. This can be seen on stroboscopic video recordings in my twit. channel.
That was awesome. It kind of acts as a superconductor locking it in at that location. I wonder what kind of applications this we'll be used for. Another Super cool demonstration! 👍👍
The topics you covered in less than 15 minutes are probably topics that a person could study and attempt to apply in Engineering for their entire lifetime. I am wondering how well computer simulation could emulate the magnetic forces you demonstrated. The real world applications seem endless but I have a feeling that computers 100 times faster than we have today would be needed to apply the properties demonstrated safely and reliably.
Does the effect work if you rotate the magnetic field rather than a magnet itself? If you were to turn small fixed coils on and off in a rotary orientation?
I doubt if rotating the field it is going to work - because rotating cannot simulate the the 7 degree angle which appears to be important
no need to turn the coils, just oscillate the current
In my opinion, you do not need many coils - you can have just one. You can switch magnetic poles by switching + and - when you run electricity through the coil. I am not sure if it will work that way, because it switches poles instantly, and it probably with just fling the magnet into space
@@cliffmathew isn't incline just makes one pole stronger than another relatively to other magnet? I'm pretty shure it's not hard to recreate.
@@Max_Jacoby I am not clear what effect the inclined mounting produces. I am waiting for someone else who might know this to clarify.
Great video, such a brilliant way of explaining things. I look forward to the one explaining the Strong Force.
Does picking up the magnet increase the weight of the device?
yes! It's physics, not magic :)
You are a champion amongst men. Thank you.
You are absolutely amazing. I have a fulfilling research career in another field and you almost make me want to switch to physics instead! 😂
The curves also look similar to AFM curves we see during non contact imaging
So cool
Absolutely fantastic, thank you for sharing this. I’m going to get my Dremel now
Thank you for a nice video!
yeah. It is a great idea to make a whole video about the strong force and gluons :) Because this video sounds like "you know, it just works this way, accept it!" )))
I mean, this video is really interesting and I would be happy to watch more, but I want to be able to understand something and not to blindly believe in it.
School?
@@girenloland not really. But I only have school education. :) so, yep, sort of...
What an awesome demonstration! That analogy makes total sense!
O.A. Barut had proposed that strong force has magnetic origin. More... follow this avatar.
TH-cam be like 1 views 5 Likes
For me it says this video was uploaded 12 minutes ago, yet your comment was posted 15 minutes ago 😂 The laws of logic apparently don't apply on TH-cam 😂
TH-cam commenters be like 1 braincell 0 awareness
It is very normal on youtube man fr
@@theonlyreal615 big fan of Crowley, eh?
@@Aerox90 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Reminds me of rotating neutron stars or black holes, those create jets perpendicular to the rotation
Have a good day. Bless you all.
Are you ready to have your kidneys consumed?
This is a worthy video to save to be watched multiple times, great work!
It's so cool to see how far my old comment has come
I remember telling you about my spinning magnet observation 3 years ago and finally we're seeing something
Great video with actual technical terms.
Did anyone else follow along fine up until the end with the quarks? I could feel my eyes glazing over as I tried to process all the info about quarks and gluons and such.
those were just quark and gluon cartoons.
@ 8:00
Reminds me of rotating a block in some versions of tetris to keep it stuck in place and give yourself time to think.
Most scientists only focus on atoms and yet there is something thousands of times smaller and there are wave forms even smaller than that. Eric might...might agree that consciousness has the same properties. After all, if X-rays and others pass right through us, there is indeed something that carries our thought forms.
Awesome I am a student and this is perfect I love it!!! Thank you!!
Hamdi Ucar and Daniel "Dan the Man" Paschall are badasses!
Thanks for the detailed information given
Thanks!
The fact that you can lock a magnet in place this way seems so reasonable it's weird nobody's ever tried it xD
Amazing… thanks a lot! 💜
very interesting with the spinning magnet
Whoa! This video is on a whole new level, thanks a lot!
the most interesting video I watched for months. It's super well explained (I'm not super educated, and slow to understand). Thanks a lot!
This is amazing!🤯
This was awesome I could think of this as an anti collision use in cars. Stop cars from collision
I thought that duct tape was the best analogy until I watched this video. Action Lab is truly a very creative channel, not just an educational one.