No, that's the Russian way of doing things. The US multi-domain operations is MUCH different. It uses highly coordinated and reactive movement and denial to overwhelm the enemy. If you can set conditions where you (with less man power and material) can out target, out shoot, and out maneuver your enemy you can do a lot with very little.
Not really. It’s about combining multi domain capability at decisive points to create windows of advantage to exploit, and keep doing that over and over until you force the enemy back to competition by defeating his will or ability to fight
the difference is that no one piece of the killchain is crucial. The pieces are versatile, and kill chains can be dynamically generated in real time without needing to be constructed and implemented at C2 levels. Joe Snuffy can target and sergeant salty can launch the missile to complete the kill from the comfort of his M1127 while sipping watered down coffee.
It seems odd that we had to rediscover that you can improvise solutions in war if the circumstances of a particular unique scenario allow for a plan that would ordinarily not work if the enemy had a different deployment. Then again, it's 2022 and the Russians seem to have not rediscovered this ancient technology yet, so I guess it really was lost.
@@DancerVeiledits not necessarily new just more interchangable. Like, it uaed to be for forward observation/targeting of artillery systems you needed a dedicated FO soldier, plane, or drone. Maybe coordinates from a satellite prepared by someone if you felt spicy. Now, it's possible for any datalink equipped plane to send opportunistic firemission targets to artillery batteries, groundbased air defenses to spot for a missile launch from a fighter, and suchforth.
It is if all you consider is the additional domains, but MDO is really about 2 main ideas 1. the conflict continuum from competition to crisis to conflict and back 2: recognizing that you never really dominate in all domains for an significant amount of time. Where Air land battle doctrine was about setting conditions and achieving decisive points to move on to the next phase, MDO in conflict is about converging multi domain capabilities at decisive points to create as many dilemmas in as many domains as possible to create further windows of advantage to exploit over and over with the ultimate goal of getting back to competition as quickly as possible.
I wish there was a symbol list with descriptions. Not all of us have learned the whole symbolic alphabet. Can only follow infantry, artillery, mortar, armor, anti-aircraft defense, wing, EW, SOF, and reconnaissance. The other symbosl just next to the friendly SOF I dont know: 1. The enemy square with the shortest line 2. The half circle with the lightning bolt 3. The 'gun' on two wheels (motorized?)
The gun on two wheels is a surface to surface missile battery. It mentions it at 3:50. I am unsure what those other symbols are but I think the half circle with the lightning bolt is a sensor as mentioned a little after 3:50.
artillery can't take out long range air defense which means air surgical to strategic assets will fail thus reducing the lethality of the offensive force due to downed fighter jets!
Yes, it could. The Taliban didn't score a military victory over Western forces. Western forces just got bored of Afghanistan and left the country, that's when the Taliban walked back in. War is not a mean by itself, but the enforcement of a will through force. The force was there, the will wasn't.
The Welsh don't stand a chance!
lol
basically try and dominate all domains (air, land, water, space)
Makes it a bit to easy when enemy welsh harriers are non existent.
No, that's the Russian way of doing things. The US multi-domain operations is MUCH different. It uses highly coordinated and reactive movement and denial to overwhelm the enemy. If you can set conditions where you (with less man power and material) can out target, out shoot, and out maneuver your enemy you can do a lot with very little.
@@aethelyfel7573😂
Not really. It’s about combining multi domain capability at decisive points to create windows of advantage to exploit, and keep doing that over and over until you force the enemy back to competition by defeating his will or ability to fight
this is a perfect situation .
This reminds me a lot of the game wargame lol
this is where the name came from
🤣😂
very interesting. thanks for sharing.
This really isn’t that different from AirLand Battle. They just changed the terminology.
the difference is that no one piece of the killchain is crucial. The pieces are versatile, and kill chains can be dynamically generated in real time without needing to be constructed and implemented at C2 levels. Joe Snuffy can target and sergeant salty can launch the missile to complete the kill from the comfort of his M1127 while sipping watered down coffee.
It seems odd that we had to rediscover that you can improvise solutions in war if the circumstances of a particular unique scenario allow for a plan that would ordinarily not work if the enemy had a different deployment.
Then again, it's 2022 and the Russians seem to have not rediscovered this ancient technology yet, so I guess it really was lost.
@@DancerVeiledits not necessarily new
just more interchangable.
Like, it uaed to be for forward observation/targeting of artillery systems you needed a dedicated FO soldier, plane, or drone. Maybe coordinates from a satellite prepared by someone if you felt spicy.
Now, it's possible for any datalink equipped plane to send opportunistic firemission targets to artillery batteries, groundbased air defenses to spot for a missile launch from a fighter, and suchforth.
... isn't airland battle just a really dressed up combined arms operation simplified like that?
It is if all you consider is the additional domains, but MDO is really about 2 main ideas
1. the conflict continuum from competition to crisis to conflict and back
2: recognizing that you never really dominate in all domains for an significant amount of time.
Where Air land battle doctrine was about setting conditions and achieving decisive points to move on to the next phase, MDO in conflict is about converging multi domain capabilities at decisive points to create as many dilemmas in as many domains as possible to create further windows of advantage to exploit over and over with the ultimate goal of getting back to competition as quickly as possible.
I wish there was a symbol list with descriptions. Not all of us have learned the whole symbolic alphabet. Can only follow infantry, artillery, mortar, armor, anti-aircraft defense, wing, EW, SOF, and reconnaissance. The other symbosl just next to the friendly SOF I dont know:
1. The enemy square with the shortest line
2. The half circle with the lightning bolt
3. The 'gun' on two wheels (motorized?)
The gun on two wheels is a surface to surface missile battery. It mentions it at 3:50. I am unsure what those other symbols are but I think the half circle with the lightning bolt is a sensor as mentioned a little after 3:50.
ADP 1-02 has all the symbols, if you're still interested
mosaic warfare
Why is robotics and autonomous systems separate from vertical lift and vehicles? Also information operations should play a larger role in multi domain
What's up with transport
Does anyone know how these map animations were created?
Will the "long version" (if it even exists) be avaible on this channel ?
Warns forms
This navy or will have to operate over 1000km to avoid 2ad unless the subs have enough cruz missiles
Welsh independence war?
artillery can't take out long range air defense which means air surgical to strategic assets will fail thus reducing the lethality of the offensive force due to downed fighter jets!
I dont get “improved lethality” surely all their weapons are already as lethal as possible?
What a load of waffle. And this is the short version?
Sad how army went from this to... two moms.
They made another one of these like last year. This is all modern stuff still being put into work.
😂
This video is so far behind mosaic warfare
All of that state of the art firepower, technology and fusion and still couldn't defeat the taliban 🤷♂️🤦♂️
Yes, it could. The Taliban didn't score a military victory over Western forces. Western forces just got bored of Afghanistan and left the country, that's when the Taliban walked back in.
War is not a mean by itself, but the enforcement of a will through force. The force was there, the will wasn't.
Declassified *