Prove 2^2013 + 13 is a multiple of 7

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ต.ค. 2024
  • Two methods presented to establish this ginormous exponential integer is a multiple of 7. They were modular arithmetic and the binomial expansion. Math teacher Ethan Splaver clearly covered Fermat's little theorem as it relates to this problem type(his explanation of the importance of the Möbius function is lucid/helpful as it is connected to square free integers and producing inverses of arithmetic functions). FLT was not used to solve this problem, but could have been used. It was easy to observe that 2^6 == 1 modulo 7 without having to be familiar with with FLT.
    ProvingAstronomicalExponetialIsAMultipleOf7WithModularArithmeticAndBinomialExpansion

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @alphs4184
    @alphs4184 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Here's my take, no modular arithmatic, no binomial expansion, no number theory. Just pure brute force .
    Observe that 2^2013 + 13 is 2^2013 - 1 + 14. 14 is just 7x2 but 2^2013-1 can be expanded by using geometric series to 1 + 2 + 2^2 + 2^3 + ... + 2^2012, which is 111...111 in binary (2013 digits binary of all 1). Similarly, 7 is 2^3 -1, which can be expanded to 1 + 2 + 2^2 which is 111 in binary (3 digits of 1).
    Since 2013 is divisible by 3 (2+0+1+3 = 6), 111...111 must be divisible by 111. Why? Because the result is obviously 100100...1001 in binary (670 copies of100 followed by 1, 2011 digits total) which definitely is an integer.
    The cool thing when you brute force is that not only you've proven that 7 divides 2^2013+13 but you also got the quotient (although, it's in binary).

    • @MyOneFiftiethOfADollar
      @MyOneFiftiethOfADollar  2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@alphs4184 if you want to call appealing to the geometric series and binary “pure brute force”, then OK 😀
      Geometric series is used frequently in number theory, e.g. the sum of the divisors of an integer formula.
      I used to code in assembly and have fond memories of binary and hexadecimal!
      Thx much for your point of view.

  • @fgvcosmic6752
    @fgvcosmic6752 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    (Before watching) My first thought is immediately Fermats Little Theorem, but I'm assuming we probably cant do that. Could be useful that 2³ = 1 mod 7.

    • @MyOneFiftiethOfADollar
      @MyOneFiftiethOfADollar  3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Your way is better!
      2^2013 + 13 = (2^3)^671 + 13 == 1 + 13 = 14 == 0 mod 7
      I didn’t notice that since FLT gives 2^6 == 1 mod 7
      Nice find! Thanks

  • @whycantiremainanonymous8091
    @whycantiremainanonymous8091 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Before watching:
    8-1=7
    If 8^n-1 is divisible by 7, 8^(n+1)-1=7×8^n+8^n-1 is also divisible by 7.
    The rest is basic arithmetic (8=2^3, 2013 is divisible by 3, so is a power of 8, 2^2013+13 is 2×7 more than 2^2013-1).

  • @ananyapatil7552
    @ananyapatil7552 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Witty name for a channel 😊