Pentium MMX 166 is one of the Best Retro Processors

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ค. 2023
  • The Intel Pentium MMX 166 is fantastic for building a DOS Retro Gaming PC. It has special registers that Gerwin's SETMUL utility can use to slow it down in fine steps. This means you can play demanding 3D games as well as many of the speed sensitive games such as Wing Commander, Test Drive III and others.
    💙 Support Me 💙
    Consider supporting me on Patreon. Get exclusive early access, behind the scenes, pickups, extended gameplay, first impressions and more: / philscomputerlab
    Disclosure: Some links in this description are affiliate links. I receive a small commission when you make a purchase. There are no additional costs to you.
    ◼️ PayPal donation: www.paypal.me/PhilsComputerLab
    ◼️ Parts from Amazon
    StarTech IDE to SATA Adapter: amzn.to/42X0jPO
    32GB SSD: amzn.to/3XeoWGe
    64 GB SSD: amzn.to/43P26az
    GOTEK Floppy Emulator: amzn.to/3XnF4VZ
    USB to SATA Adapter: amzn.to/43O8jn8
    ◼️ Games
    Epic + Inferno: adtr.co/MkuOnf
    ◼️ Shopping links
    Amazon.com: amzn.to/3fvz8sg
    GOG: adtr.co/eqi5mb
    AliExpress: s.click.aliexpress.com/e/b6c7Xgiy
    eBay US: ebay.us/bKzLAW
    ebay UK: ebay.us/Bs9Z0u
    eBay Germany: ebay.us/k3bPol
    eBay Canada: ebay.us/CD6KZz
    eBay Australia: ebay.us/eon4Ys
    🛠 Resources 🛠
    Gigabyte GA-586ATX Motherboard: www.philscomputerlab.com/giga...
    MS-DOS Starter Pack: www.philscomputerlab.com/ms-d...
    DOS Benchmark Pack: www.philscomputerlab.com/dos-...
    Gerwin's SETMUL Tool: www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?...
    JazeFox's UNISOUND Driver: www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?...
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 568

  • @TurboMMaster
    @TurboMMaster 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +82

    My very first CPU, so many good memories. What's interesting, paired with 64MB of Ram and Voodoo 2 did good enough till late 2001.

    • @HoldandModify
      @HoldandModify 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Near same for me. I upgraded to a 233mmx and Matrox/Voodoo2 cards, AWE32, 64mb ram, SCSIii HDDs, and it lasted me a LONG time.

    • @SpicysaucedHD
      @SpicysaucedHD 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Was my first as well! I OCd it .. and it got damaged

    • @TurboMMaster
      @TurboMMaster 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@HoldandModify Out of curiosity: Could you tell performance gain from switching from 166MMX to 233MMX?

    • @HoldandModify
      @HoldandModify 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@TurboMMaster in my 3D rendering yes. Also some games got a small bump

    • @MrMusicopath
      @MrMusicopath 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      i had a pentium 200 mmx BUT with 4mb of ram, i suffered a lot because few games worked properly thanks of my parents not wanting to put more money in ram 😒😒😒

  • @ohareport
    @ohareport 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    honestly i was stuck with a pentium 120mhz for so many years and the number of “minimum specifications” that started at 166mhz was such that i absolutely lusted after this cpu!

    • @Frenziefrenz
      @Frenziefrenz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Same but with 100.

    • @bucharestbiketraffic
      @bucharestbiketraffic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Same here. I had the 120Mhz with 32 megs of RAM and an S3 Trio with 2Mb of video memory. Barely ran anything :)

  •  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Back in the day I went from a 486 DX2 66 to the Pentium MMX 166. The difference was HUGE! All of a sudden I could play this new crop of 3d games that were way too slow for my old 486. And some of the games I already had (like Fifa 96, Screamer, Hi-Octane, Mechwarrior 2, and others) were running much better. Around the same time, some PS1 games were made available on PC and I remember being super hyped about stuff like Tomb Raider, Wipeout, and Destruction Derby. Those are all great titles, but my big game for this system was the first Fallout. Such great memories of that old computer and lots of love for the Fallout franchise too!

    • @peterkatsoulotos7709
      @peterkatsoulotos7709 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I remember FIFA96 had two different commentary sound sets, a normal quality one and a totally different set of commentaries as well as being higher quality. I could never figure out what or how it would activate the higher quality and different commentary. I would fiddle with sound blaster settings but seemed to just have a mind of its own picking which to use.

    • @hristobotev9726
      @hristobotev9726 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      K6 166@225mhz was way better

    • @negrusz
      @negrusz 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I changed from 486DX4 100 to P166MMX. But the real huge difference came when i pair it with a Voodoo Rush then a Voodoo2. After that i upgraded to AMD K6-2 350 and used at 400. With 3Dnow! (and MMX also) the V2 its rocks. To compare a Pentium II 400 i remember i had more fps in some games with half price. My neighbor went nuts :)

    • @dr_crimbo
      @dr_crimbo 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@negrusz same here I changed from 486 DX4 100 to P166 MMX , funny thing is i tried to get a olivetti 486 dx4 100 from radio rentals, but they sent one with less ram and a 486 SX 25 in it ! i was quite annoyed ,mostly as i had a 386DX-33 already . i told them i was not paying for it and to pick it up and i wanted my deposit back , while waiting surprisingly radio rentals went bankrupt , so i kept it and got the 486 dx 100 for it in the end

    • @CougarCat21
      @CougarCat21 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is no 485 CPus

  • @krz8888888
    @krz8888888 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    Played Lucasarts adventure games, the first Command & Conquer, Need for speed 2/3 and even UT99 once overclocked to 262 with a Voodoo banshee. Tons of memories on this system

    • @joshstucki4349
      @joshstucki4349 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Same combo here! :)

    • @makegamemusic
      @makegamemusic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wow, that's an impressive overclock! I think I just about managed the 200mhz on mine back in the day. Had the Voodoo 1 and then Banshee in mine too. I got the Voodoo just to play Final Fantasy 7 lol

  • @retropuffer2986
    @retropuffer2986 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    P200 MMX was when my circle of friends and I built our own machines. I remember that era well. I was able to run Quake II, Unreal 1 and Dark Forces 2 on that machine.

    • @philscomputerlab
      @philscomputerlab  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'm surprised about Unreal! Dark Forces is perfect for this machine though.

    • @clintthompson4100
      @clintthompson4100 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​​@@philscomputerlabBuddy of mine when I saw Unreal 1 for the first time he had the AMD K6-233MHZ CPU and a voodoo card and it ran great. Not surprised he could run it on a Pentium 200 Mhz MMX. If his card had an accelerator card like the Voodoo it likely did most of the work. Also you can still purchase those startech heat sinks I just recently about 3 months ago bought three of them.

    • @JohnSmith-iu8cj
      @JohnSmith-iu8cj 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@philscomputerlabi like the challenge of making games run on the slowest possible hardware while still being playable. You should try it as well 😉 unreal is more gpu limited than than cpu limited on a k6-2. My next build will be 233MMX voodoo 2. I found the old asus mainboard my parents bought with a p166 in 1996. It can fsb 83mhz but I need to desolder the Dallas

  • @joshstucki4349
    @joshstucki4349 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    This was the first CPU I bought entirely on my own as a teenager. I paired it with 32MB of memory (now 32GB is common, just wow) and a Voodoo 6MB card. It was also my first Windows 95 machine. It was fantastic.

    • @philscomputerlab
      @philscomputerlab  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I skipped the MMX, had a Pentium 133 and straight to Pentium II.

    • @DyceFreak
      @DyceFreak 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@philscomputerlab I had a Compaq laptop with a P133 MMX. Though it was somewhat useless since it just had an S3 Verge for video. Couldn't play SimCity3000 even though it it technically met the requirements.

    • @pantyukovk
      @pantyukovk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      32 гб вау, а кроме цифры красивой, толку чуть, а интереса ноль.

    • @proCaylak
      @proCaylak 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      even in the video, he said that the ram had 32 gigabytes of memory. :D

    • @jeffyp2483
      @jeffyp2483 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      where did you want to go that day?🤭🤓

  • @Brunorego80
    @Brunorego80 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    February 1997. Paired with the S3 Trio 64 V+. The following year I added a PowerVR Apocalypse 3dx (4MB VRAM) which made it last a bit longer, until 1999, when I got a Pentium III 500 and a Savage 4 with 32MB VRAM. I always went for the low to mid range stuff but it was more than enough for that time. Windows 95 CD - Edie Brickell - Good Times.

    • @SaraMorgan-ym6ue
      @SaraMorgan-ym6ue หลายเดือนก่อน

      imagine pairing it with an rtx 4060🤣

  • @ErrorMessageNotFound
    @ErrorMessageNotFound 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    I had one of these but it was the 200 mhz version. It ran Windows 2000 much better than I anticipated. I always loved the look of them.

  • @wolfxx7297
    @wolfxx7297 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    My Cousin had one in 1996, we played a ton of Games on it: Command & Conguer 1&2, Duke 3D, Outlaws, Jedi Knight, Quake 2, Kingpin, Unreal, Fighting Force, Subculture, Tomb Raider 1&2, Fallout 1&2, Jagged Alliance 2 and much more, all on 64 MB and an Matrox Mystique; great Times :)

  • @3dfxvoodoocards6
    @3dfxvoodoocards6 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Like! My first ever PC back in early 1998 had a P166 MMX. With it I played for the first time Quake 2, Unreal and other great games of that period (in 320x240 of course). I always dreamed of upgrading it with a Voodoo Banshee but unfortunately when I had the money to do so I also changed the CPU to a faster k6-2 400 and never got to see my P166 MMX running with hardware acceleration.

  • @HoldandModify
    @HoldandModify 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My FIRST Windows PC ever! Came from a Commodore Amiga. Built a 166mhz system. Then not too long later upgraded to 166mhz MMX Then finally 233mhz MMX! 233 was REALLY NICE.

  • @Booruvcheek
    @Booruvcheek 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    @7:25 - I believe that's a 32 MEGAbyte, not 32 GIGAbyte SDRAM module.
    Really nice looking game, Epic. Never heard of it before.

  • @Inkvisitor
    @Inkvisitor 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    What a coincidence, I was afraid I had broken my MMX 166 when the voltage regulator exploded, but after some soldering it is perfectly fine. You might want to give Lands of Lore 2 or 3 a try, those games play well enough on this CPU with a Voodoo 3 PCI. Thanks for the video ! 👍

  • @lemagreengreen
    @lemagreengreen 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    P166MMX was a great chip in its day too, they sold a lot of those!
    Combined with a 3DFX card it made a PC that was competitive in gaming for a couple of years which was pretty long back then :)

  • @RiksRandomRetro
    @RiksRandomRetro 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    All agreed, one of the reasons my primary dos machine has exactly a p166 mmx. It's been so utterly flexible with setmul. Still having enough horsepower to run late dos games. A Voodoo card rounds it all out for a great Win95 gaming time too. Great video!

  • @nihilyst8056
    @nihilyst8056 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I started with a Pentium 200MMX back in the day when these where almost new. It was a beast back then 😂. Thank you for these Videos, I really enjoy watching them!

  • @retrowikid
    @retrowikid 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I totally agree. The 166MHz Intel Pentium MMX is balanced in many respects. It has great processing power for late DOS era games and most early 3D Games using DirectDraw (software rendering) or the 3dfx Glide API/OpenGL. It is an inexpensive CPU and not that much sought after, compared with a 200MHz offer while it has the same powerful 66MHz bus and cache size. I think that the generous L2 Cache and the 66MHz bus are the major causes for its performance compared with the older Pentium architecture. Later in the production cycle, the higher clocked Pentium MMX processors did not have much improved performance as the architecture shown its limitations.
    Before the 166Mhz Pentium MMX you would have CPUs that had bus sizes all over the place, ending up with a poor performer such as a Pentium 120Mhz (2x60Mhz bus) and a sudden boost on the Pentium 133MHz (2x66MHz bus) out of nowhere. Of course, the CPU was not to blame, it was due to Socket 7 motherboards that only late in the product manufacturing cycle ended up with a lot more CPU frequency multipliers and bus speed. Of course Cyrix was also part of the reason for this surge in interest in the aging Socket 7 platform, as were the popular AMD K6 and K6/2 processors.
    In the end, the 166MHz Pentium MMX was and still is a great performer while being not that demanding on cooling and highly stable. You may wonder why I did not mention the MMX extension as a major benefit. First of all, there were few games/apps that initially used it, and when there were more, a Pentium MMX processor, even at 200MHz, was not enough for them. The MMX extensions were actually called Matrix Mathematics Extensions not Multi-Media Extensions, but since they were used in multimedia apps, games being highly popular, it was an example of successful marketing of Intel.

  • @RETROCENGO
    @RETROCENGO 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Ahhhhh Pentium 1 MMX love 🤩🤩

  • @ZeroHourProductions407
    @ZeroHourProductions407 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    While I didnt have a computer at home until well into the Pentium 3 and AMD Athlon era, the Pentium mmx was kind of the first era of hardware where everything is the age actually ran smooth and looked really good, even on much faster CRT's than the monitors of the current age. I want to say this era of performance was the first glimpse at emulating consoles I cared about.

  • @KeyToTime
    @KeyToTime 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Perfect timing for me to watch in my lunch break, thanks Phil!

  • @joshreiman
    @joshreiman 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The mobile Pentium 133 MMX is very difficult to obtain, but I am glad you included it in the spreadsheet

  • @Keullo-eFIN
    @Keullo-eFIN 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    My first CPU from back in the day. What an incredible boost when I upgraded to PII 400 :)

  • @flightsimdeskuk
    @flightsimdeskuk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Due to your multiple recommendations of this processor I, of course, have it (233mhz version). The 233Mhz one is the model to get I think, as the multiplier is unlocked. So you can set it to be any of the lower models

  • @AaronHendu
    @AaronHendu 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Pentium 133 mmx was our first real family PC. We upgraded it from 16mb to 48mb of RAM and Windows 98. It never had "3d accelerated graphics" but it was the first PC I played Quake on and I am still playing Quake games to this day. I remember buying Quake 2 and only being able to run it at 513x384 software mode but it still instantly became my favourite game. I spent a ton of time with the original Roller Coaster Tycoon, as well. And lots of demo discs from PC Gamer and whatnot.

    • @AaronHendu
      @AaronHendu 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Whiplash...how did I forget that game...I played it almost as much as quake. That one racing game with loops and stuff.

    • @pantyukovk
      @pantyukovk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Так же у друга начинали q1 и q2 на p90 и p133 соответственно, q1 ~320x200 может чуть выше, и q2 в маленьком окошке. До сих пор эти две игры вижу только в виде opengl/glide, и воспринимаю как излишество, только quake3 должен быть ускорен аппаратно. Имхо.

    • @pentiummmx2294
      @pentiummmx2294 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i had some Toshiba with a MMX 133, sadly the varta nimh inside of it leaked and killed it

  • @michelefarroni93
    @michelefarroni93 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Never had the chance to live this PC era (started with a socket 754 athlon xp with win98), and I recently restored a baby AT with a 166 mmx, 32mb edo ram, cirrus logic video, avance logic als100 sound, and win95. Without you I could have not been capable of this operation, thank you so much for all your support!

  • @MarcoGPUtuber
    @MarcoGPUtuber 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Slow and steady wins the race!

  • @MrMoogle
    @MrMoogle 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My first computer had a Pentium 75. I wanted a Pentium with MMX so bad. But by the time I saved up enough, the Pentium II was out. Things moved so crazy fast back then. I remember getting a Pentium II 266 and then later that year my friend got a Pentium II 350 on the 100MHz bus and I was jealous, haha. Then the Pentium III 500 was the new hotness about a year later along with AMD coming out of nowhere with Athlon. It was so exciting back then watching technology take such huge leaps. Such a great time to be getting into computers and so many fond memories of that era's hardware. I will forever be sad 3Dfx didn't make it.

  • @michaelturner2806
    @michaelturner2806 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I jumped over the Pentium era completely. I started with a used 386 with a 486 overdrive chip, moved up to a later 486 board with a Cyrix "586" or something, then leaped over into an AMD K6-2. I then developed an appreciation for the stability and compatibility of the Pentium II with the 440BX chipset, and that's my preferential target for a retro PC when I finally get the space, time to dig through half-functioning parts, and finances to finish it.

  • @filipetmarcal
    @filipetmarcal 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I like old processor benchmarks

  • @lettmons
    @lettmons 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    My first PC had a Pentium Pro 200 MMX in 1997

  • @RealNonsonic
    @RealNonsonic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great video Phil, I am in the middle of working on a 166mmx digital research desktop I found with monitor at a thrift shop for $25 CDN a few months ago. While I have 486 project on the go as well as a 200mmx dell tower I am trying to make similar to my old pc I had back in the day, the Pentium 166mhz MMX was something I wanted to try and run DOS on. Helpful video !

    • @philscomputerlab
      @philscomputerlab  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Check for battery and replace it! Even coin batteries can leak...

    • @LegionMiniatureGames
      @LegionMiniatureGames 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@philscomputerlab swapped it out last night, installed dos on a compact flash card so far :)

  • @poipoipoipoipois
    @poipoipoipoipois 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    i remember getting 10-15 pcs for free with p1 166's from my school around the year 2002 as they were upgrading to new ones with p4s, took all of them home and built myself a 3 hard drive'd pc with as much ram as could cram in it (probs 512mb or 256? dont remember lol). Built probs 6-7 as good as i could get em' with the parts i had and sold them off for round 20$CAD a piece, ah the good ol days

  • @chrisducati26
    @chrisducati26 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I had that cpu in a socket 7 system back in 1998 before updating to a super fast amd k6 2 300, it was ok paired with a voodoo 1 but with the k6 2 everything was butter smooth

  • @Pressbutan
    @Pressbutan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My first real PC back in the day was a P1/166. I approve. A very hearty chip for what it is.

  • @luismagallanes2371
    @luismagallanes2371 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Our first family computer was the MMX 200 with windows 95! I was just blown away. It came with a cd rom and a generic sound card. Also came with an encyclopedia and a demo of a few games, including Pandemonium. It was great at running anything that was a few years older and non demanding current gen games. Tho by that time there was already pentium 2 at 266mhz.

  • @AJGuinness
    @AJGuinness 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Ah this is music to my ears, I have access to a Pentium MMX 166, so knowing now there's a utility that can help hit the sweet spot for certain DOS games is exactly what I needed to hear to get it out of storage!

  • @StaelTek
    @StaelTek 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I literally just got an entire Fujitsu PC with that exact CPU from an old lady. Unfortunately, i am not skilled enough to recap the motherboard/PSU and my knowledge doesn’t go earlier than maybe 2004, so i gave it to a friend of mine who can renovate it and have it for his collection of retro PC

    • @philscomputerlab
      @philscomputerlab  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Please share him the video, hope it helps him make an awesome DOS PC 🙂

  • @PhAyzoN
    @PhAyzoN 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I went all the way for the 233MHz in my recent MMX build. They're cheap enough (at least in the US) and since you can lower the multiplier anyway, figured it'd be nice to have some headroom for more Windows games.

  • @adriansdigitalbasement
    @adriansdigitalbasement 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a Pentium 200 MMX in my DOS PC where I installed some switches to allow me to clock it from 166 to 266mhz. (by over clocking the bus) It's just so versatile where 166 with caches disabled, it is nice and slow as Phil points out.

  • @Evansmustard
    @Evansmustard 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    i really appreciate this channel thank you for making this stuff for us.

  • @SpeedIng80
    @SpeedIng80 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I had a Pentium MMX 166 running at 200 MHz. It was a great machine but only for quite a short time due to the mentioned incredibly fast development around the year 2000.
    The MMX 166 had replaced my IBM 6x86 P166+ but was much faster in many games due to the faster floating point unit. And it generally ran with much less issues and crashes, but that might have been due to the improving operating systems as well.
    After the MMX I tried an AMD K6-300, but I never was as happy with that system, I think the main issue has been the VIA chipset. That's why it always hurts my stomach when you're dealing with VIA chipsets in your videos - bad memories of crashes to desktop and blue screens come back into my mind ;-)
    Then I went back to intel (Celeron 300A @450MHz, ran games like a dream, but again not for that long...), but that's another story ;-)

  • @amnesiac-original
    @amnesiac-original 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Pentium MMX 166 was my first PC class computer, so i have great nostalgia :)

  • @Jasonsadventures
    @Jasonsadventures 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Another legendary video from legendary Phil. Looks like I've been wise to put away a handful or two of 166mmx machines these last few years

  • @MongooseTacticool
    @MongooseTacticool 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This takes me back, I can still remember the moment that the guy who ran our local netcafe got his 166 MMX, and we were all very jealous! I ended up with a cyrix PR200, and my mum had a p133.

  • @a120068020
    @a120068020 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow yes my first new PC had this with 16MB RAM - upgraded to 233MMX and 32MB RAM very soon after. Awesome days.

  • @manoftherainshorts9075
    @manoftherainshorts9075 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My friend had 166 MMX on his old PC someone from his family gifted him. We were programming simple things on it under Windows. We even played Half-Life 1 in software on it!

  • @GL1zdA
    @GL1zdA 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My Pentium build is probably my favorite one currently. It works well with DOS games, it runs Windows games and with a Voodoo 1 I can play all my favorite early 3D games. A Trio64V 2 MB or better a 4 MB ViRGE and you also have great video (the regular Trio64 unfortunately missess the video features) and hi color graphics in high resolution (high as in matching my 17” monitor). And ISA slots for sound on top of that.

  • @georgez8859
    @georgez8859 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Still have my First PC Gateway P5 133 so many good times...Thanks for the Info and the Video

  • @leandroribeirolopes4363
    @leandroribeirolopes4363 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My first system was a 233mmx, 32megs of ram and a Awe64 bundle with Wihpslah, capitan claw, moto racer, actua soccer, time commando and twinsen odyssey! Amazing Days! This pc come with pc chips vx-pro II (via chipset) so i was able to put an k6-2 in 83mhz bus and dimm memory, so many good memories😊

  • @aebtdom
    @aebtdom 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I currently own a Pentium MMX 233mhz with 64MB SDR. It is a very capable processor to run windows games like Interstate 76, monster truck madness 1 & 2 and quakeGL with my voodoo 2 12MB. It also runs mechwarrior 2 glide without problems as other early win9x games like tomb raider 2 & 3. My primary card is a SST-2064/5 S3 Trio 64V+ 2MB (upgraded from 1mb).
    For these above games the 166mhz probably falls a bit short on quakeGL indeed. But back in the day everything from 30fps and higher was considered excellent. Duke3d at 25fps was a great experience. The 60fps minimum idea was really a thing that came to life with the internet era from 2005 on. Msdos time was mostly about people being happy about the game starting at all.
    All with all a nice video you have made there, but only one thing I disagree on is the 60fps requirement. I certainly will try out the speed limiter for msdos.

  • @eytfiftin
    @eytfiftin 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My first PC ~1997 is a Sony VAIO with this CPU. I am very happy with it and spent countless hours playing the 1st Diablo game. Those were the days.

  • @tehFoxx0rz
    @tehFoxx0rz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Still enjoying my Pentium MMX 233 "time machine" system; slows down excellently, all the way down to 8.5 in 3DBench at 50MHz FSB! And when not slowed down I keep it comfortably "overclocked" at 75MHz FSB for ~266MHz! With a Voodoo 1 and S3 Virge DX, it plays GLQuake buttery smooth! Even Unreal is fairly playable. Though I'd use my Slot 1 system for that :P
    Interestingly, I was curious to see if I could get a lower score in 3D benchmark than 8.5, and I found myself a Tseng ET3000 ISA graphics card after hearing those were really slow. And yeah, it seemed to go way slower, down to 7.5! That wasn't the end of the batch file you made though, and strangely, for the last two tests before disabling the L1 cache...the score jumped back up to 86.9, then down again to 76.2 (the registers all disabled)! I can only presume that I managed to get it to run so slow that 3DBench underflowed or something. Not sure what games would need to be quite that slow before they need an actual 8088/8086, but it's interesting!

  • @lordwiadro83
    @lordwiadro83 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    My first PC after a C64 had a Pentium 133. I always wanted an MMX machine but my parents could not afford it. Things were changing super fast back then. Some years later I jumped over to a Duron system. Now in my retro PC I have a Pentium II 333, which works fine for both DOS and Win98 games.

    • @philscomputerlab
      @philscomputerlab  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yes the Gigahertz race was on!

    • @Jasonsadventures
      @Jasonsadventures 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      C64 to 133 Pentium is a huge jump although very depressing about missing the Amiga

    • @lordwiadro83
      @lordwiadro83 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Jasonsadventures I regret missing the Amiga, but it was too expensive for me to acquire back then. My C64 was in fact a C64C, the modernized edition, but with still the same old guts.

    • @Jasonsadventures
      @Jasonsadventures 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@lordwiadro83 I sold my C64 in 1987 to get an Amiga 500, Immediately regretted it and ended up buying another C64 in 198 or so. These days I use the C64 more than the Amiga. I'm enjoying the old PCs too, mostly for music on the OPL specific trackers (like adlib tracker 2 and rad tracker and almost the demoscene) the new picoGUS sound card is getting a workout too.

    • @lordwiadro83
      @lordwiadro83 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Jasonsadventures Me personally I don't miss my C64C that much. It was a simple computer good only for playing simple games. I quickly learned about other more powerful computers and I was feeling behind. My first PC in late 1996 opened a lot more possibilities. Even the games were not just dumb arcade games anymore.

  • @MichaelRusso
    @MichaelRusso 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Interesting to see this video. I have a stack of them for just this reason. Perfect DOS machines!

  • @arthurmann578
    @arthurmann578 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I remember on my super socket 7 board PC, that I still do own, there was a program that opened up all of your BIOS settings that the manufacturer of the board kept turned off and hidden from view. It did make a pretty big performance boost to your PC depending on which settings you used. I remembering seeing it open up my BIOS settings for the first time that I never knew were even there and I couldn't believe how many were actually hidden by the manufacturer! It was super fun to play around with. I know that I have it saved somewhere but for the life of me I just cannot remember where. I actually can't find it on the machine itself anymore! I remember that it was mostly free to use, but if you donated some cash to the creator he would open up even more features for you! I did use that machine quite a lot back in the day. Now I am feeling nostalgic for it and maybe I will try to get it set up again soon! It does have a AMD K6-2 500mHz CPU and an AGP slot with what I think has an ATI 9200SE in it. Not the best GPU at the time, but it was all that I could afford and does run games decently. I did manage to "squeeze out" just barely playing Morrowind at the time. Good times back then! 👍👍

    • @philscomputerlab
      @philscomputerlab  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I use a 9200 Radeon a lot! It works great with many 98 games, especially at lower resolutions.

    • @arthurmann578
      @arthurmann578 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@philscomputerlab Yup! Now if I remember correctly, I think I used Win 98 in that PC too! Got to check it out again soon.....when I find it.....🤔😂

  • @billkabb
    @billkabb 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    i still have my celeron300 unlocked by using some tape in one pin and overclocked @450 .. first king of overclocking i think

  • @alvar891
    @alvar891 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video as always. I had one of those sitting in my attic for years. Sadly i have a board with no ps2 outs. Managed to get a ps2 to at adapter but need to find a ps2 to 4 pin for the mouse. would be easier to just get a newer mobo i guess lol. Had a feeling these old parts will one day come in handy around 15 years ago. Also had a voodoo 3 3500 just laying there haha. Looking forward for the next video.

  • @SelfIndulgentGamer
    @SelfIndulgentGamer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I remember playing tomb raider on my friends PC with a 100mhz cpu, and that ran nicely in dos 🙂

  • @cleanycloth
    @cleanycloth 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have an HP Vectra XA/5 133, and whilst I was inside the unit removing the BIOS password I set it to run at 166MHz and it runs absolutely perfectly. It’s even got 80MB RAM now which is plenty! Runs windows 95/98 nicely and does DOS really well. It even came with a Sound Blaster 16 PnP ^^

  • @captainwasel8377
    @captainwasel8377 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another awesome video. Looking forward to see more retro parts.

  • @PROSTO4Tabal
    @PROSTO4Tabal 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love what you serve 2d/3d transition period is always a cherry on cake

  • @lutzgrosshennig
    @lutzgrosshennig 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I love the Pentium 166 MMX. Wrote my diploma thesis about it. The long latency of the EMMS (Empty MMX State) instruction pretty much killed the benefits of the new instructions but the larger L1 caches gave a small speed uplift over the non-MMX variants.

  • @T3hBeowulf
    @T3hBeowulf 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is brilliant and just in time. I recently acquired an ATX Socket 7 mainboard and coincidentally the seller included a Pentium 166 MMX processor with it. Finding AT cases has proven very challenging so I've been on a quest to build up a system in an ATX case. (Planning to use a black case which reminds me of your "Sleeper Retro PC series".)
    Those Startech Socket 7 coolers are still available though they can be a little pricey IMHO at ~$20 US shipped. I ended up making a franken-cioler with a Socket 370 heat block and some Socket 7 retaining clips before finding a decent deal on the Startech cooler.
    All in all, this is a wonderful tour through this platform and an inspiration to finish assembling my own version of this. I'm anxious to finally use my Orpheus sound card in there as well.
    Thank you for putting this together Phil!

    • @philscomputerlab
      @philscomputerlab  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sounds like you are all set very soon 🙂

  • @pacolima431
    @pacolima431 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A lot of good points in this video! Love this kind of reviews. I still think this alternative offers way more fine tuning options for DOS than I would ever need in practice. A super socket 7 with a K6 plus version is often more than good enough and can do a bit more Windows9x stuff if you want it too. And I think you can put a Pentium MMX in the same motherboard in case you want try them. But I understand those boards are not that easy to find compared to a normal socket 7 mobo...

  • @mockier
    @mockier 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    These are great CPUs for gaming on. I was sold on it after seeing your older video, and was lucky to find one rather cheaply (a few years ago).
    For even older games I use a AMD 386 Sx40. That's still too fast for my favorite XT and 286 era games but I can use AT-slow to reduce the PC speed to the correct speed to play things like Death Track, Spacewars and Sopwith. And it's period correct since it was available back when these games were being re-released on CD for 386 and 486 computers.

  • @antdude
    @antdude 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I remember my Compaq Armada 1585DMT lappy with its P150 MMX!

  • @jeetuag
    @jeetuag 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I always regret not waiting 1 more year and got Pentium 100. MMX was the first CPU that could play mpg2 video without skipping. It was a very big deal back in the day.

  • @AladimBR
    @AladimBR 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Finally had a chance to try this. I set a Pentium MMX 233 as 133MHz (2x66Mhz), got 12.1 on the slowest set (all caches off on BIOS as well). That's between a 386-25 and a 386-33. Wing Commander 1 runs nicely on this speed. I knew Setmul, you just made your point on the convenience and easiness of use with the 136in1 package. Really nice trick to have around for those really old games. My PC history started with a 486DX33 and I did play Wing Commander on it, never knew it was faster than intended. As things were moving fast during those years ( I would sell my current machine and build a new one once-twice a year), I never really went back and replayed such games. As I heard once back at school, there is things correctly or poorly designed. We have software from that time that is not speed sensitive - and some that are. Today we can tell who did right vs wrong. Thanks Phil / cheers from Brazil

  • @RetroTinkerer
    @RetroTinkerer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hello Phil, I can't believe the time I "lost" searching for the perfect parts to recreate the 386DX I had and a 486 DX 2 66 with VLB that I always wanted but slipped between my fingers and a Pentium MMX (that I already had) was everything I needed.
    BTW Phil are your test benches available somewhere with an affiliate link, when the GPU mining craze I tried to get one but the prizes went full into insane mode.
    Thanks for all your videos I'm really enjoying your new style, combining hardware setup with a mini game review by the yone of your voice you seems to be enjoying it too.

    • @philscomputerlab
      @philscomputerlab  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Awesome 😎 High Speed PC is the company. It cost me a lot for the shipping but they have stood the test of time. I tried a few other ones with acrylic and metal rods, they are just too fiddly and cumbersome. This one is super easy and perfect for what I do.

  • @marcelocorpucci7707
    @marcelocorpucci7707 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you so much for another amazing video Phil! Did you try Terminal Velocity? I think that may be another great choice to test this kind of machines. Cheers from Argentina!

    • @philscomputerlab
      @philscomputerlab  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I will check it out! I'm sure I have it 😊

  • @JohnSmith-xq1pz
    @JohnSmith-xq1pz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    🎵It's all about the Pentium!!...🎵

  • @RevDrCCoonansr
    @RevDrCCoonansr 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love old 3-D! When it's good it's good (Stunt Car Racer) and when it's bad it's bad! (Wings, even though I love it).

  • @clintcolombin
    @clintcolombin 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Combine that setup with a voodoo 1 card to really maximise what you can enjoy with quake etc. Helps to stretch the last bits of performance from the 166 mmx.

    • @pantyukovk
      @pantyukovk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Сегодня просто так пробежал уровня 4 на voodoo3.

  • @lucaspam
    @lucaspam 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My first computer was a Pentium MMX 200 with 32MB of RAM. I did lots of stuff; I've played many emulators and was capable of playing many games - and use Windows 98. I have good memories. I think that most of the motherboards from this time are busted in some way or are hard to find, so I found a sweet spot on the Pentium III. I was able to finally get a Tualatin CPU recently and I am very happy. I never was into very old DOS games and to me, games like space quest or wing commander don't matter. I do agree that the Pentium MMX can be an excellent entry platform for someone that is into early DOS games. Thanks for the video Phil!

  • @GameSensay
    @GameSensay 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The 166mhz CPU pared with 16mbs of ram for Tiberian Sun worked great! So many happy memories...All the new technology crap just not feeling it, like it was back in the dos days.

  • @modlabs
    @modlabs 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for your work. As i remember you have the same video that describes Pentium MMX. As for me, it would be much more interesting to see what Pentium 200 can do, because a lot of CPUs have free multiplier and there are lot of boards that allows you to switch native clock speed from 75 to 200. Also i tried to told you about another cache control utility that allows you to switch between WT and WB modes on P6+ CPUs. SetMUL can't do the same, as for now. It would be interesting to see comparison between Pentium Pro and MMX with all cache and clock options you could set. I even sent you email about it, but with no luck.

  • @baumstamp5989
    @baumstamp5989 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    what surprised me is how similar the gigabyte board looks to my asus p2b (where i had a p200 mmx running on) i
    i first thought, yup i had that board too :)

  • @jamezxh
    @jamezxh 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    still have draw full of 233 mmx's . I remember getting a copy of POD.

  • @tonydavis8696
    @tonydavis8696 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I had a prebuilt P 133mhz from Quantex. I bought an MMX 200 and swapped the chips. That board would run it only at 166. I ended up wasting more money and bought an Asus p55t2p4 board I think it was which ran the chip at its rated 200mhz. That was the first time I had ever swapped out a main board. That was in 1997 about the time that Tomb Raider 2 came out, and I enjoyed the game with a Matrox Mystique video card.

  • @bobgrimes8618
    @bobgrimes8618 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I had a 200mHz MMX back in the day running OS/2 Warp 3.

  • @excessro
    @excessro 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I got this badboy clocked at 188 Mhz back in the days paired with a Voodoo Rush.

  • @amindlost
    @amindlost 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I've a pair of P233MMX boards, both ASUS TX97s (one with just SDRAM, the other with both 72-pin and SDRAM). I bought them off a guy who collected a bunch of scrap machines from some local schools for $20 and a case of beer two years ago (along with some other nice stuff, like a couple 462s and Slot 1s). They're nice boards, and pretty solid, both in excellent condition for their age. Only have one of them set up at the moment, also using a Gotek, but with a CF card instead of SSD. They have on-board Creative Vibra sound, which seems to provide decent SB16 compatibility, but I picked up an ESS1869F to go in it instead.
    I ran a P233MMX with an AWE64 Gold from 1997 to 2001, first with a crap ATI card, then with a PCI Voodoo3 2000, so the P233MMX has a special place for me.
    Anyway, thanks for the video Phil. Love your content as always.

  • @jeff15
    @jeff15 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Awesome cpu. One of my first high end cpu at the time. Had it paired with ati gpu . Noiceeeee

  • @TheGrunt76
    @TheGrunt76 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I agree, 166MMX is great CPU for early 95 and late DOS era. I have Tulip desktop which I specifically built for this era. I have Orpheus 2 for sound, Voodoo 1 for that 3D accelerated goodness and ATi Mach64 Pro Turbo (onboard AT24 had compatibility issues, so decided to go with this card). I upgraded the RAM to 64MB, it has a TX chipset which means that it is practically the maximum, but of course completely overkill already. It has built in USB and AMD PCNet adapter, so the three expansion slots available were enough for my needs. Case has a nice small footprint, it is clean and in beautiful condition.
    For OS, I went with 98lite Micro with 98SE as a base OS. I think it is simply the best option for Pentiums ans slow PIIs, as it gives all the benefits of 98SE pretty much with 95 performance. I built a start-up menu with different DOS options and booting to Win, installed 4DOS and other of typical stuff I use with my other DOS systems too.

    • @philscomputerlab
      @philscomputerlab  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well done, I like that machine a lot!

  • @UpLateGeek
    @UpLateGeek 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I should go through my parents garage and see if they kept the rackmount server I rescued from e-waste a number of yeas ago. It's a socket 7 PICMG SBC machine with some kind of Pentium MMX processor. I always wanted to build a new case for it and turn it into a super compact desktop PC.

  • @310McQueen
    @310McQueen 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The first computer I ever bought for myself had this exact processor. I eventually did put a Voodoo graphics card in it.

  • @drivingmemad7127
    @drivingmemad7127 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Got to say I preferred that PPGA packaging over the CPGA because it looked cooler which is kind of ironic as the CPGA had more surface area for cooling. You are making me want to dig out my Intel TC430HX with P200 MMX PPGA again Phil!

    • @pantyukovk
      @pantyukovk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Керамический выглядит гораздо круче!

  • @borealis8uno
    @borealis8uno 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Also my first CPU. It could be wonderfully overclocked: my original motherboard could push the base frequency to 83 Mhz, making it run at 209 MHz (83 MHz * 2, 5). Later I mounted it in a Super Socket 7 motherboard, and it was able to run at 250Mhz (100 MHz * 2, 5) without any problem . When I upgraded to a K6-2 400 I was disappointed: it was a bit faster, but less than I had hoped for. Looking back on it later, I should have waited and buy a K6-3 450...

  • @federicocatelli8785
    @federicocatelli8785 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The cpu in my first own computer .....more than 25 years ago😢

  • @DaigoIto
    @DaigoIto 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Al leer los comentarios me he dado cuenta que la Pentium 166 MMX es la primera PC para muchos, que recuerdos!. En estos momentos estoy tratando de restaurar mi primer PC y con tecnología de ahora gracias a los vídeos de PhilsComputerLab, en lo único que tengo problemas en poner una tarjeta gráfica ATI Rage XL 8MB que no me funciona.

  • @XGalaxy4U
    @XGalaxy4U 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I had a Pentium Pro. Just played Stars! mostly and connected to the interweb. It wasn't much back then. A Google search may give you a few hits. Got a Pentium 3 computer later on. Another 2,000 dollars.

  • @Daz555Daz
    @Daz555Daz 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    P166MMX also had tons of overclock %. I ran mine on an 83MHz FSB for 209MHz - which was so fast for it's time. Back then, FSB was so so important for performance, assuming you had peripherals that could handle the bus speed.

  • @gamewizard1760
    @gamewizard1760 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I still remember how happy I was, when I finally found a Pentium 200, without MMX. Most of the production went to OEM's, from what I read in various places, so if you wanted one, you had to wait for someone to upgrade. You just could not get them, any other way. At one point, the Chinese recyclers were listing tons of them. They must have received a big shipment of used pc's around that time. The supply has tapered off a lot since then.

  • @derfuchs339
    @derfuchs339 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Funny you picked Epic as testing game, as this was one of my favorite games in the past with a 486DX33. We used to have one of those Colani Desktop PCs and upgraded it twice. I made myself a retro project out of it and rebuild two of them already (486DX33, Tseng ET4000, Soundblaster Pro 2 + Pentium 90, Spea V7 Mirage, Pro Audio Spectrum), for the third I already have the hardware (Pentium 200MMX, Matrox Mystique, AWE64 Gold) but it is really hard to find another Colani Desktop nowadays. As a note, I also rebuild your ultimate Win98 PC as another fun project. Sourcing the hardware for an obtainable price took some months, especially for the mainboard, but now its one of my most used Retro PCs. Love your channel Phil, many thanks for your fountain of Retro PC enthusiasm.

    • @philscomputerlab
      @philscomputerlab  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Colani, wow haven't heard that name in ages! Any tips for playing Epic? And did you play Inferno, I'm really curious.

    • @derfuchs339
      @derfuchs339 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@philscomputerlab I just found out about Inferno a while ago and did not play it so far, but the big box versions are still quite obtainable. I never managed to play Epic any further than the 4th level or something, as this game is a little cryptic with the mission design. It´s one of those games that you just love to play and do the first levels again and again and again...

  • @TheHangarHobbit
    @TheHangarHobbit 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I never had Pentium money back then, I always went either AMD or Cyrix. Ahh the days when multiple vendors supported a single socket.

  • @appwraith
    @appwraith 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A couple of weeks ago I got my hands on a Pentium 233 MMX. I plan to use it in an Acorp 5TX29 board, with a Tseng ET6000 videocard. Can't wait to put it together.

  • @orangejuche
    @orangejuche 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Pentium MMX 166 was my first PC I actually owned, had windows 98 SE on it, and I played so many classic games on it.

  • @KevinSills
    @KevinSills หลายเดือนก่อน

    I had this CPU in my first computer in 1997. I used the onboard graphics, and sound, not sure what the motherboard was. Shortly after I got that computer I added a 3dfx Monster 3D video card, and from that point on I was hooked on 3D gaming! :)

  • @MarkTheMorose
    @MarkTheMorose 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Epic was criticised on the Amiga for being too short; I avoided it for that reason. Maybe one day I'll try the Amiga and DOS versions against each other. Your Diamond Stealth graphics card there is the same as I had in my first PC, a P75. It got a few CPU upgrades along the way; I recall I think a P120 or 133. It wasn't socket 7, I did change to an S7 board at some point, presumably when I upgraded to a 166, 200, or 233 MMX. As for graphics my memory is more hazy; I recall being suckered in by the Intel i740, and at some point had an S3 Virge, then an Nvidia TNT of some sort. It was the FPS games such as Doom and Rise of The Triad that tempted me across to the PC.

  • @ondrejbursa9969
    @ondrejbursa9969 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have three laptops with pentium MMX 166, one with w95, the other two w98, and I still occasionally use them, but not for gaming, but for some programs that only run on Dos or w9.x. I'm always amazed how quick it is