Ostensible Owner or Doctrine of Holding Out (Benami Ownership under TPA, 1882)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ต.ค. 2024
  • In this session I have tried to cover the concept of Ostensible Owner or Doctrine of Holding Out or Benami Ownership which is discussed under section 41 of The Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

ความคิดเห็น • 75

  • @ashokhegde3321
    @ashokhegde3321 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    One of the best law series lecture and I am appreciative of you Prof Poojari

  • @suribabunsuri7414
    @suribabunsuri7414 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Verry good explanation sir
    Verey eassy wiring exam. This topic

  • @avdnr1961
    @avdnr1961 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wonderful lecture . Very clear voce i am very happy thank u very much

  • @jahidhasanimon2076
    @jahidhasanimon2076 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank u Sir for making this point so easy..doing self study.. Love from🇧🇩💚

  • @faizalmohamed7543
    @faizalmohamed7543 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It is very useful class for me for guiding me for all subject conversation in Tamil also...

  • @advashutoshshukla8499
    @advashutoshshukla8499 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sir, you make it very easily understandable.🙏🙏

  • @bhuvanathangamani7590
    @bhuvanathangamani7590 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really its to good to understand and very useful for examination

  • @aanchaljaiswal8693
    @aanchaljaiswal8693 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There was lot of confusion before coming to this lecture nd infact upto 2 slides I was not able to understand it........
    Now after complete lecture everything is clr..... tq sir👏

  • @ashimajiji8060
    @ashimajiji8060 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much sir🙏🙏 from Kerala

  • @mouriyaraja5295
    @mouriyaraja5295 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Video of sec.41 yet to complete but now i feel am comfortable with your expression and the way you explaining things with background picture. Very kind of you sir. God bless you. Can i get your number sir? ....happy dreams sir. Vanakkam🙏🍎

  • @umauma2105
    @umauma2105 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome explanation sir👍

  • @chitranjali01
    @chitranjali01 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ha ha ha example of Mr Shashi Tharoor 😃😃😃 nice video made by you 👌

  • @pamelalobo4835
    @pamelalobo4835 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i love the way u teach
    keep up the gud work
    God bless you

  • @parthgaurav3649
    @parthgaurav3649 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir ur smile is as lovely as your teaching

  • @rajkunwarupadhye3510
    @rajkunwarupadhye3510 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks a lot sir very helpful lecture

  • @vinuthabc5596
    @vinuthabc5596 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thank you,i understood verywell plz continue this

  • @arjunyadav2613
    @arjunyadav2613 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You make the topic so easy to study

  • @vismayauchambally8716
    @vismayauchambally8716 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you sooo much sir. Iam always thank to you♥️♥️

  • @harnamsingh5544
    @harnamsingh5544 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good analysis.

  • @anbujayabal3079
    @anbujayabal3079 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for explaining in English only

  • @spicybond007
    @spicybond007 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a link or copy judgement on “Luchmunn v/s Kallichuran (1873) 19 W.R. 192” that is mentioned in the video?

  • @ajayshukla6365
    @ajayshukla6365 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thak u really ur explanation is excellent

  • @shikharbhardwaj4599
    @shikharbhardwaj4599 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Brilliant Sir!!!!
    Very Helpful

    • @GaneshPoojaryLawforAll
      @GaneshPoojaryLawforAll  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for comment. Please share videos with your friends ☺️😊

  • @ranjitbasfor420
    @ranjitbasfor420 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir, may I mention a little bit of error ? that's Bunnoo Bibee was wife of Alexander and Macqueen was daughter of Alexander, during the lecture, you mentioned Macqueen as wife of Alexander.
    Ranjit Basfor, Guwahati, Assam.

  • @2002dimpu
    @2002dimpu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nicely presented..well done.

  • @faizalmohamed7543
    @faizalmohamed7543 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Continue your career for all legal subjects...

  • @meeracyriac3789
    @meeracyriac3789 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video sir.. please do more videos on tranfer of property act

  • @RightandWrite
    @RightandWrite 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very simple and quite helpful

  • @vanshbatra7640
    @vanshbatra7640 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome video
    Better then others.
    Shashi Tharoor punch was lit 💥.

  • @vaibhavpkhanna
    @vaibhavpkhanna 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Even i doubt Shashi Tharoor would have given such tough words :D

  • @jagadishtg
    @jagadishtg 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you do video on doctrine of lis pendence u/s 52 & doctrine of part performance u/s 53A

  • @advarathypraveen3738
    @advarathypraveen3738 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great effort

  • @bilalshaikh7055
    @bilalshaikh7055 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir i have a qestion if husband purchase a property on the name of wife she became ostensible owener but the possession is under the husband then can wife sell that property and can it become a valid trasfer?

  • @souravdas5137
    @souravdas5137 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good lecture sir

  • @Paradise_Arena
    @Paradise_Arena 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    A brings his horse and B his tonga and they ply it and divide the income everyday. Are they partners?
    Please reply..

  • @arjunyadav2613
    @arjunyadav2613 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very well done sir

  • @rukminiray3366
    @rukminiray3366 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please make a video about 53 and 53A .I need it very badly

  • @gowrinandana5109
    @gowrinandana5109 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    U r gem❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @charanharish578
    @charanharish578 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot
    Wonderful explanation sir
    Always smiling
    Gives us positive vibes to study
    And makes tough topics easy❤️

  • @tharanishreedinesh145
    @tharanishreedinesh145 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir....plz can you put a video doctrine of lis pendens in transfer of property act....mu semester exams is coming soon .....I always follows your video to clarify my doubts ....I can't find out the exact explanation in others video

  • @bhuvanathangamani7590
    @bhuvanathangamani7590 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir please cover all the topics in property law

  • @anupamsharma9970
    @anupamsharma9970 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir this is mains question please tell me which provision will be explained in this question from transfer of property act. The question is
    Where there is no gift but a direction to transfer from and after a given event, the vesting will be postponed till after that event has happened, " Are there exceptions of this rule? Explain

  • @MsDONSHERE
    @MsDONSHERE 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir a doubt in requirements point 2 there should be consent from real owner but in mc donald case there was no consent from husband no sir?

  • @venkatuduthala7205
    @venkatuduthala7205 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Superb

  • @geetanjalidas2673
    @geetanjalidas2673 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very helpful sir....

  • @athirasajeev6013
    @athirasajeev6013 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very useful class sir

  • @vismayauchambally8716
    @vismayauchambally8716 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, in this in whose name the agreement of property lies?

  • @ratnanjalibansal4359
    @ratnanjalibansal4359 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir you explained it very well..🙏🙏

  • @athulyams444
    @athulyams444 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ❤️🔥

  • @sowmyasai8204
    @sowmyasai8204 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir under ram kumar vs MC queen case the sale was valid without the consent of mc Donald
    But under requirements u said that consent must be there
    Can u pls clarify on this?

  • @pryankurbhardwaj5625
    @pryankurbhardwaj5625 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Its great

  • @jintukalita7911
    @jintukalita7911 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great

  • @aabidislam1997
    @aabidislam1997 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice sir

  • @SB-jp7wd
    @SB-jp7wd 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good...explanation....

  • @roadtripwithkhaleef1665
    @roadtripwithkhaleef1665 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mr. ganesh poojary ji its more help full if you use Hindi language and cartoons to make better uderstanding undoutedly ur teaching is amazing

  • @bhuvanathangamani7590
    @bhuvanathangamani7590 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lots sir

  • @lawyerparijat
    @lawyerparijat 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much.

  • @chandrakumari7683
    @chandrakumari7683 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir can you please explain Doctrine of Priority sec 48 of TP Act

  • @umasanthu83
    @umasanthu83 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir u have wrongly mentioned that mr. donald purchased a property in mr. donald name... i think it should be mrs. donald name..

  • @anbujayabal3079
    @anbujayabal3079 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Put videos to Evidence Act .... Please sir

  • @supriyanavali2082
    @supriyanavali2082 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🙏👌👏

  • @vishnump9502
    @vishnump9502 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sooppr sir

  • @neelamprusty7631
    @neelamprusty7631 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir make video for Section 43 to 53

  • @adv.dipalikamalakar7998
    @adv.dipalikamalakar7998 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Easement pe video plzz to make

  • @goldengirlgoldengirl7498
    @goldengirlgoldengirl7498 ปีที่แล้ว

    😮😮😮

  • @kannamavlogs159
    @kannamavlogs159 ปีที่แล้ว

    Valid

  • @nooriamina7043
    @nooriamina7043 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir kindly minimize your picture as it is hiding the slides

  • @jacobzachariah9756
    @jacobzachariah9756 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is so difficult about the word
    " ostensible " ? Is it not another word for " apparent " ? " Ostensible" appears to be more attractive ! That's all.

  • @jadejanandkunvarba9765
    @jadejanandkunvarba9765 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir no match