Ramayana Vishavruksham Book Review By RJ Nani || Ranganayakamma || TomTom Films ||

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ต.ค. 2024
  • Ramayana Vishavruksham', meaning 'Ramayana, the poisonous tree', is a Marxist critique but based entirely on Valimiki's Ramayana. It proceeds in the same order as that of the Sanskrit original: Balakanda, Ayodhyakanda, Aranyakanda, Kishkindhakanda, Yuddhakanda, Sundarakanda and Uttarakanda. While Valmiki's Ramayana is of seven volumes/parts, Ranganayakamma's 'Ramayana Vishavruksham' is in three volumes/parts each volume running about 700 pages. Similarly while Valmiki Ramayana is composed of about 2,400 slokas (poems), Ramayana Vishavruksham is composed of 16 long-stories accompanied by 11 links (narratives that 'link' the stories) and about 600 foot notes that show evidence from the Sanskrit original in support of the critique.
    Ranganayakamma followed the two original Sanskrit versions which are printed in Telugu script accompanied by 'prati padardha' (word for word meanings), 'tatparya' (summary) and 'tika' (commentary) by Gattupalli Seshacharyulu and Chadaluvada Sundara Rama Sastrulu and published by Shashilekha Mudrakshara Sala of Chennai and Vavilla Ramasastulu and sons of Chennai respectively during the period 1900-1955.
    Watch the book review of Ramayana Vishavruksham by RJ Nani.
    Do Like, Share, Comment and Subscribe to our channel.
    You can also find us on:
    / tomtom__you. .
    / tomtom_yt-10. .
    / tomtom81215370
    The TomTom Books is a web channel intended to promote Indian books through detailed exploration, interviews, discussions, video essays and analytical compilations. It is intended primarily for the purpose of encouraging informed discussions, criticism and review of books and towards such purpose the programs use short extracts of cinematograph films, sounds recording and photographic works. These clips and extracts are of a minimal nature and the use is not intended to interfere in any manner with their commercial exploitation of the compete work by the owners of the copyright. The use of works are in compliance with the fair dealing exception provided under Sec. 52 of the Copyright Act, and we asset our use of the works under the exception provided for criticism and review.

ความคิดเห็น • 14

  • @rambabuk8123
    @rambabuk8123 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Ten years kritam chadivanu chala manchi book idi

  • @sankarorange665
    @sankarorange665 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bro epudu ramudu not parfect ity epudu dini valla samajaniki amchepali anukuntunaru bro
    But ade ramayan story ni inspiration ga tisukunte konchem ina manchiga vundali ani anukuntaru

  • @sankarorange665
    @sankarorange665 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ramayanam story valla manchi jarigi vundochhu kani tappu gani chedu gani jaragaledu apudu enka anti prablum

  • @nani8798
    @nani8798 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I suggest. Please ignore this book and continue to atleast practice and byheart 25 slokas out of 25000 slokas in ramayanam.

  • @sankarorange665
    @sankarorange665 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Chedu jarigite idi tappu ante baaguntundi

  • @kavyakiran6464
    @kavyakiran6464 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Everyone have their own positive and negative. Ramudu lo kuda chedu undi and Ravanasurudu lo kuda manchi undi.

  • @Vinaykumar_konda
    @Vinaykumar_konda ปีที่แล้ว

    Ramudu devudu kadhu... Manalanti manishey... Ramudini endhuku devudini chesaru...? Nijanga devudena...? Kevalam ramudu mathrame endhuku devudu ayyadu...? Migilina manushulu endhuku devullu kaleru...? Oka manishi lo anni manchi mathrame unnaya... Chedu ledhaa...? Book chadivithey ardam avthundi...😌😌 sagam chadiva bagundi... Appati Society lo high profile people ni God's ga ela portrait chesaru... Manishi loni manchi pakkana petti... Devudu ani cheppi manchi anedi devudiki mathrame... Manam manushulam... Kabatti chedu thappadu ani... Chala information undi... Devotion or nammakalu pakkana petti book chadivithey alochana unnavallu evaraina book accept chestharu...😌😌

  • @raghuyarramsetty1701
    @raghuyarramsetty1701 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Even if we study as thinking them as humans...still its worst book

  • @rajashekarg4585
    @rajashekarg4585 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bro book ekkada dhorukunthundhi ledha Google lo undha

  • @sankarorange665
    @sankarorange665 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Minimum camen sense vundali

  • @ajitkapadia8950
    @ajitkapadia8950 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Who decides that Ram was a good character ? He had all the weaknesses of greed, suspicion, cruelty, unsteady and power hungry selfish man who preferred kingship to virtuous wife Sita. In short Ram was a very very bad character- as per the original Valmiki Ramayan . It is Tulsidas who made him a good person- 2000 years after the original Valmiki Ramayan. Please read just 10 pages a day.

  • @entlasaiteja7419
    @entlasaiteja7419 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pacchakaaamerlu ochinodki lokam antha pachhaga kanapadindhi anta 😂