The Franco-Prussian War using Google Earth

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ก.ย. 2023
  • Made using Google Earth.
    The Franco-Prussian War from start to finish.
    ___
    Music:
    - "Scott Buckley - Goliath" is under a Creative Commons (CC BY 3.0) license.
    / musicbyscottb
    Music promoted by BreakingCopyright: • 🕕 6 Minutes of EPIC (F...
    - Song: "Miguel Johnson - Good Day To Die [Epic]" is under a Creative Commons license (CC BY 3.0)
    / migueljohnson
    migueljohnson.bandcamp.com/
    Music promoted by BreakingCopyright: bit.ly/good-day-to-die-song
    ___
    (Not endorsed by Google, this video is completely made by me. This video is not sponsored by Google.)
    This video is for educational purposes only.

ความคิดเห็น • 1K

  • @mapsinanutshell
    @mapsinanutshell  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +283

    ℹ: *1 flag = ~10,000 soldiers*
    If you'd like to turn your ideas into future videos and get early access to video teasers, join the Discord server here: discord.gg/4dNDQMsF5f

    • @MH-jg6vk
      @MH-jg6vk 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Russo-Turkish war 1877-78?

    • @TheSlazzer
      @TheSlazzer 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Hey mapsinanutshell, great video! Can you share your sources for these movements? Or are they just approximations? :)

    • @oajajaj
      @oajajaj 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@TheSlazzerHe traced the whole of Here mapping video on the Franco Prussian War

    • @TheSlazzer
      @TheSlazzer 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @oajajaj haha OK. But where did he get the information about where? How many soldiers? Were moving at any given time of the video. These day by day videos make it seem like there's a "perfect" historical record when reality must be more blurry. Unless you read literally every divisions' or army corps' history. Which would be a task that would take a historian, perhaps a decade.
      So I'm just asking what approximations were made and what was used as a source, to get an idea how authentic it is.
      That doesn't take away from my appreciation for this video BTW :)

    • @oajajaj
      @oajajaj 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheSlazzer Yeah it's okay because here mappings video on the subject is the most accurate video on the war

  • @joasmares5836
    @joasmares5836 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2568

    As a Belgian, it's weird seeing Germany picking the short way to France for once.
    Edit: why is everybody explaining my country's history to me i know about de damn Maginot Line guys it was a joke

    • @stephanobarbosa5805
      @stephanobarbosa5805 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +94

      Não existia linha Maginot ainda

    • @bastykino5357
      @bastykino5357 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      lmao

    • @phase0400
      @phase0400 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +145

      The shortest route isn't always the easiest one, although tbf this was the easiest route in this war. By the time WW1 started, the French had learned their lesson. Massive defences were built along the Franc-German border, which would later become the Maginot line for WW2. Trying an invasion through there would result in massive casualties.

    • @redzard2015
      @redzard2015 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Well maybe that tells us something, but either way Belgium should always be the obvious choice

    • @TexasViking_INFP-t_5w4
      @TexasViking_INFP-t_5w4 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Northern French and the Dutch are just swamp Germans

  • @TheGreatOne-gw7xh
    @TheGreatOne-gw7xh 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2200

    Prussians we’re on the offensive and still managed to suffer minimal losses. Wow.

    • @saldjkalskdjasldkja
      @saldjkalskdjasldkja 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +83

      A bit silly of the French to give it a go considering they, the British and the rest of the coalition learned against and beat their best tactician in years.

    • @genkupoke7064
      @genkupoke7064 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +241

      ​@@saldjkalskdjasldkjaFrance didn't expect German state to be part of the war. It's all due to Bismarck who managed to totally brained French état major

    • @q3eq3eq65
      @q3eq3eq65 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +130

      In these times going on offensive wasnt equal to suffering more losses

    • @imreallynoob8311
      @imreallynoob8311 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +111

      Normally in a pitch battle germans were the ones to suffer more loses from their tactics, but it enable them to outmenuvers the french force
      I assume the french casualties are because of the captured troops, and prussian superior artillery

    • @IAmTheStig32
      @IAmTheStig32 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      Prussians were practically super soldiers. One of them could do the work of four soldiers from any other country.

  • @eduardovictorfurlaneto805
    @eduardovictorfurlaneto805 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1016

    it is very interesting to see that in 1870 the armies hardly reached 1 million, but less than 50 years later, in the first world war, there were several million soldiers and millions died every year

    • @scezich6126
      @scezich6126 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +85

      I mean the German leadership during the Franco Prussian war was much more bold compared to the causious aged generals of ww1

    • @blackpaint9093
      @blackpaint9093 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +101

      ​@@scezich6126Yeah you gotta keep in mind that in WWI germany was also facing UK in the western front and Russia in the east, the 2 wars are not comparable

    • @bart3030
      @bart3030 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      ​@@blackpaint9093yeah and adding to that, there is a huge difference in weaponry in those fifty years

    • @commiethebeastie
      @commiethebeastie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      In WW1 industry was producing greatly more arms. The Russian industry that still was using steam power sources instead of electricity power sources has collapsed the first one.

    • @commanderstorm8874
      @commanderstorm8874 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@scezich6126the Prussians were also first to the battlefield due to making the trains run on time and so the French were mostly disorganized

  • @usersays8599
    @usersays8599 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +617

    It was the Prussian victory over France and their leadership uniting Germany into an Empire that made Meji Japan choose them as a role model to modernize their military; often choosing to hire Prussian officers as consultants to help build a modernize army that would later defeat the Qing & Russian Empire

    • @glous6320
      @glous6320 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +104

      Same thing with Chile. They were going to bring in French marshals to train their military officers but opted for Prussians instead after this war. Those officers then advised the Chileans go to war with Bolivia and Peru in which Chile won. They still have annual Prussian military parades that are straight out of 1914.

    • @yumk4308
      @yumk4308 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      Very knowledgeable! amazing!
      Japan's Meiji constitution was based on that of the German Empire.

    • @cpj93070
      @cpj93070 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Army yes, for there Navy they used the best consultants at sea (Britain)

    • @AngelOfTheLastHope
      @AngelOfTheLastHope 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      That's absurd, French officers were very good. I mean, when they were taking over parts of Africa, and when working with actual maps of the region instead of gallivanting aimlessly in the Belgian countryside without knowing where to go to find Prussians to fight.

    • @Soviet00000
      @Soviet00000 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yea ok buddy sure

  • @The_whales
    @The_whales 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

    Finally, an offensive war that doesn’t involve going into Belgium

    • @perfolkesson7333
      @perfolkesson7333 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Such a shame for the invading armies missing out on the wonderful beer, waffles, and fries

  • @duckfero7362
    @duckfero7362 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +602

    Damn, as a french myself, I didn't even know such a big part of France was occupied, I thought only Alsace and Mozelle was occupied at most

    • @PhthaloType
      @PhthaloType 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +95

      In WW1, Germany (prematurely) produced thousands of medals that showed the Arc de triomphe and Eiffel tower and said "1871-1914," since that was the previous time German troops were in Paris.

    • @PrestoPresteinn
      @PrestoPresteinn 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      У вас очень плохо преподают историю в школе.

    • @Hazzelnot94
      @Hazzelnot94 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

      @@ttthias About 60% of those 600 000 casualties were captured troops, actual deaths was around 150 000.

    • @Mr_d42069
      @Mr_d42069 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      @@PrestoPresteinn he is french, not american

    • @PrestoPresteinn
      @PrestoPresteinn 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Mr_d42069 у них образование такое же плохое как в США. Образованные люди никому не нужны

  • @damelonleboom
    @damelonleboom 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +333

    Finally someone did this! such a forgotten part of history.

    • @mertm.995
      @mertm.995 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@fabianvoigtlander1042means I forgot it

    • @legobullymaguire1375
      @legobullymaguire1375 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@fabianvoigtlander1042not talked about a lot
      (nvm its not actully forgoten )

    • @linclokatz
      @linclokatz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Pretty well known war ngl

    • @CoolEdo
      @CoolEdo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Trust me if you think this war is forgotten, you'd be surprised.

    • @Adamm17004
      @Adamm17004 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Literally the birth of Germany, how is this at all forgotten?

  • @precariousworlds3029
    @precariousworlds3029 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +308

    After watching so many WW1 and 2 mapping videos it feels weird to see Germany invading France through the Maginot line

    • @sleewa_
      @sleewa_ 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +142

      cuz it didnt exist in that time

    • @Arguingpit93
      @Arguingpit93 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +142

      This is the reason Maginot line was created

    • @precariousworlds3029
      @precariousworlds3029 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Ik but still

    • @lingor_3217
      @lingor_3217 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Same man.

    • @beetlebg3759
      @beetlebg3759 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Arguingpit93It still failed

  • @creepyhourreddit
    @creepyhourreddit 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +68

    This is really impressive! i look forward to watching every video that you make

  • @Metal_Mario.
    @Metal_Mario. 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Props to the google employees for keeping google earth up in the late 1800s.

  • @dangerousnoodle8779
    @dangerousnoodle8779 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    The prussians were smart enough to snake France's victory points to force a capitulation with minimal losses. Must be very experienced hoi4 players

    • @wilhelmu
      @wilhelmu 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      looking at the causality ratio they were not playing hoi there, they were playing dynasty warriors

    • @Beowulf1222
      @Beowulf1222 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      "Trucking into paris"

  • @Plutotheaxolotl
    @Plutotheaxolotl 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Congrats on 100k subscribers 🎉you deserved it

  • @MrRexta
    @MrRexta 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    100,000 subscribers, all deserved.

  • @rhyqatrophonlety
    @rhyqatrophonlety 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +215

    I think you can make the flags that represent the troops translucent, otherwise it's hard to see the front lines.

    • @austria-hungary7680
      @austria-hungary7680 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Not too opaque however

    • @user-bb5pt3wc4r
      @user-bb5pt3wc4r 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's not accurate anyway, it's more representational that a true record of where they were.

  • @dolphindoesroblox969
    @dolphindoesroblox969 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    congrats on 100k man ive been here sense 9k 👍

  • @Charlie-backrooms
    @Charlie-backrooms 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Nice job love all your videos

  • @stalhandske9649
    @stalhandske9649 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    It's wild to think the war was practically decided in battle of Sedan 1-2 Sep. 1870, which takes place at 01:45-01:50 in this video. Yet timewise it was in the war's beginning phases.
    I found it strange, though, that the result said battle, liquidation of ~1/7 of the total French forces at the moment, is not reflected on the unit icons at all.

    • @propagandalf123
      @propagandalf123 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, it was basically the french refusing to accept that they have lost after they started the war for a petty reason for half a year, costing them half a million lifes and afterwards being still salty about it, why the French were so keen on imposing such harsh conditions in the treaty of versailles. And that is why everyone hates the french

  • @schnelma605
    @schnelma605 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Congrats on 100000!

  • @santossteven97
    @santossteven97 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Nice work thanks ❤

  • @chris6ix.
    @chris6ix. 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Can you make a tutorial with DaVinci Resolve, please? I really like these videos and would love to make some myself, but Adobe Software is way too expensive.

  • @Youravrageguy
    @Youravrageguy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    That’s why you always remember to pack modern artillery

  • @brodielanders3932
    @brodielanders3932 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Congratulations on hitting 100,000 subscribers

  • @user-xn9vk5gl1b
    @user-xn9vk5gl1b 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    congrats on 100k

  • @B1lly_
    @B1lly_ 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Napoleon III at Sedan on his horse with a hit mark: *plz kill me already*
    His horse: 🗿

  • @acgmc6669
    @acgmc6669 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Extraordinario trabajo, enhorabuena desde España

  • @qwertyui_uwu
    @qwertyui_uwu 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    oh congrats on 100k

  • @sx1ky438
    @sx1ky438 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Wow bro! Amazing video. Can you do one about the pig war?

  • @Almagesto25
    @Almagesto25 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    I admire you for your sacrifice, I bet it was a big jorney of search and editing to make this video. You deserve this amazing video to become a reference for those who study the Franco-Prussian War, because your graphic quality is simply wonderful.

    • @schatzkammerein
      @schatzkammerein 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      sacrifice sounds like a dramatic word

    • @noyes4968
      @noyes4968 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      "Sacrifice" as if he was a veteran in that war.

    • @schatzkammerein
      @schatzkammerein 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@noyes4968 yeah it is cringe

    • @heremapping4484
      @heremapping4484 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm pretty sure he traced my video on the Franco-Prussian war, not that i'm against that. But it does seem to be what happened

    • @Almagesto25
      @Almagesto25 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@schatzkammerein, I'm a mapper too, I'm currently editing a 2 minutes video since March which covers 500 years, and I still have a long time ahead editing 2 or 3 frames daily in order to keep my schedule. Damn yeah, that's a quite sacrificial, definitely not easy to do.

  • @Samgar0359
    @Samgar0359 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Great battle nice video good job bro love Germany from Kazakhstan 🇰🇿❤🇩🇪

  • @kingstickman5278
    @kingstickman5278 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing video!

  • @mapshistorical
    @mapshistorical 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    awesome man

  • @anderskorsback4104
    @anderskorsback4104 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Those big blue blobs of encircled French troops within German lines. Damn. That's like slow-motion blitzkrieg with infantry.

    • @matheusexpedito4577
      @matheusexpedito4577 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The germans always had a need for speed

    • @guyname8760
      @guyname8760 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      well yeah, maneuver warfare has always been a part of German military history

  • @Jacob07111
    @Jacob07111 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    If I am not wrong the french were the ones who started the war and attacked first, why are the german states colored as red and France as blue?

    • @stellargravitywell1828
      @stellargravitywell1828 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's a reflex I guess

    • @heremapping4484
      @heremapping4484 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The French provoked the war hoping to march on Berlin

    • @RKNGL
      @RKNGL 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      France’s colour is traditionally associated with blue, while Germany’s is usually Black/Grey or Red.

    • @nahouledeb5949
      @nahouledeb5949 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      France is always blue

    • @lahire4943
      @lahire4943 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@heremapping4484Bismarck provoked the war.

  • @heremapping4484
    @heremapping4484 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice work

  • @molybdaen11
    @molybdaen11 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    It's wild that the casualty's grow but the army's became even larger the longer the war lasted.

  • @JOELMG918
    @JOELMG918 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Sería buenísimo si haces un video sobre la guerra del Pacífico. Peru - bolivia vs chile

  • @larsgrotjohann
    @larsgrotjohann 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    I would be happy if ARTE would make a German-French documentary series about this conflict. Objectively and without nationalistic-patriotic inventions.
    I am glad that we are friends with the French and that the warsbetween our nations are a thing of the past.

    • @charlesl3847
      @charlesl3847 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hope Germany burns in hell, and all of the Germans with it.

    • @molybdaen11
      @molybdaen11 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Sadly the warmongers are awake again.
      The eubhad to be stabilized with more cooperation, there has to be a standard refugee protocol and the leaders should send politicians and dilopmats instead of tanks and planes to stop a war.

    • @siegfried7951
      @siegfried7951 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@molybdaen11Today, the only warmonger is Russia, not the EU, the USA, or Ukraine.

    • @rohne83
      @rohne83 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@siegfried7951 the war in Ukraine was started by ukrainian Poroschenko regime in 2014 - trying to exterminate the huge Russion minority in Ukraine. Everything after that was just a futher escalation. And in March 2022, Ukraine and Russia were short before a freedom treaty - it was London and Washington who forced Ukraine to stop these negotiations and continue senseless fighting.

    • @X3RUBIM
      @X3RUBIM 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ARTE has always been biased towards France, so that is not going to happen.

  • @antoniocarrascosa6060
    @antoniocarrascosa6060 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Extraordinario trabajo

  • @PhilippeCoutinho2210
    @PhilippeCoutinho2210 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like your videos very much ❤❤👍👍

  • @AwoudeX
    @AwoudeX 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    If i'm not mistaken, the denser cannon formations and flexible tactics and high maneuvrability is what made France suffer such a humiliation

    • @certaindeath7776
      @certaindeath7776 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      yeah, despite tanks and automobiles not existing yet, this was an example of manouver warfare, prussians acted fast, circumvented pockets of resitance, and sourrounded them, cutting them off from communications and supplies, making them teethless

    • @hs2546
      @hs2546 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Tbh this view on warfare seems more appropriate to explain Napoleon's success. I think what gave such an edge to the Germans was their highly organized mobilization system and their successful usage of a militarised railroad network, all of which enabled them to bring men and sufficent material much more quickly on the front, whereas the French army was in a poor state and highly disorganized because of decades of an unprecedent level of corruption in the military ranks (since Napoelon III's regime).

    • @vistagreat9994
      @vistagreat9994 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hs2546 True

    • @cyrilk3254
      @cyrilk3254 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And also the Germans powderless needle rifle

    • @hs2546
      @hs2546 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@cyrilk3254 powderless... or smokeless? Smokeless powder came in use at the end of the century. During the Franco-German war, both side were using blackpowder cartridges, and French troops even had an edge with their Chassepot rifle since it used smaller ammunitions, which enabled them to be more precise at a greater range and to deal much more damage on their target compared to the Dreyse rifle used by the Germans.

  • @rrqfan1523
    @rrqfan1523 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    France always looses in a 1 vs 1 against Germany 😂😅

    • @matheusexpedito4577
      @matheusexpedito4577 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Except that time napoleon solo'ed europe

    • @Iamnotracistlmao
      @Iamnotracistlmao 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@matheusexpedito4577 there existed no "Germany" at the time of Napolean

    • @matheusexpedito4577
      @matheusexpedito4577 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@Iamnotracistlmao yeah, but the german states existed

    • @Iamnotracistlmao
      @Iamnotracistlmao 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@matheusexpedito4577 which were not united

    • @adelaidesngan604
      @adelaidesngan604 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Napoléon 😂

  • @user-ov7ty1wd3c
    @user-ov7ty1wd3c 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great video, I feel like it would be better if you moved the flags away, there in the way of the Frontline

  • @Skaris27
    @Skaris27 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    awesome!

  • @Jordan77831
    @Jordan77831 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    This channel shows meps of wars that no one else covered yet. Thank you for preserving forgotten parts of history 👍

    • @Freddy_Fazbear_and_Witherred
      @Freddy_Fazbear_and_Witherred 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No one? Not really

    • @Egg_8
      @Egg_8 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Stolen comment + L ratio + grammar mistake “map” and also a lot of people made vids about this war.

    • @goji3908
      @goji3908 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Freddy_Fazbear_and_Witherred And forgotten? Not really

    • @hansdampf640
      @hansdampf640 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      this was covered by many channel,with narration and background knowledge...
      this war was an answer,not a question

    • @Egg_8
      @Egg_8 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@hansdampf640 TRUE

  • @MXB2001
    @MXB2001 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Amazing the number of encirclements the Prussians did without having armour. I guess Cavalry could have done it. The lopsided casualty figures are due to the Prussian artillery if I remember correctly. Also interesting how long the encircled forces could last in those days. They obviously didn't need as much supply as they would today.

    • @lythd
      @lythd 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      casualties would include captured troops from encirclements, which would give quite a lot of that. (not that artillery or other factors wouldn't have also mattered, but just this was the most extreme one in the video).
      and yeah i was interested in that too, i guess they don't really need fuel like tanks and vehicles and none of those are craazy big like its realistic they could be fed on the land.

    • @adsiz67983
      @adsiz67983 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      no it's actually because Moltke cheated and chose both mobile warfare and superior firepower

    • @NYG5
      @NYG5 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lythd french troops would also be able to more effectively endure encirclement on their own territory in the summer months

  • @staymadlilbroski
    @staymadlilbroski 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    100k this is for all your work.

  • @BoilingHotCoffee
    @BoilingHotCoffee 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    imagine chilling in the southern part of france throughout all of this

  • @gmunro5443
    @gmunro5443 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    5:23
    There is a large encirclement comparable to Metz, but I never heard of it before.
    Are these movements accurate or estimation?

    • @ColeInside-ij2yt
      @ColeInside-ij2yt หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most likely a rough estimate because it is hard to confirm battles and how they played out in those years.

    • @gmunro5443
      @gmunro5443 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This was not ancient times, there are specific numbers for the losses of each battle.

    • @gmunro5443
      @gmunro5443 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hello, this is me from the future. Every single troop placement in the video is extraordinarily inaccurate. This war was not even fought with front lines, it was fought with armies, like napoleonic times.

  • @Nylon_riot
    @Nylon_riot 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I watch these for the music selection more than anything.

  • @johngrey5806
    @johngrey5806 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow, what a slaughter! How did it end? Wish the video would continue or at least provide some info screen at the end.

    • @G.A.C_Preserve
      @G.A.C_Preserve 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It ends with the German victory and the formation of the German empire leaded by Prussia

  • @user-ol7zc8lj5k
    @user-ol7zc8lj5k 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can you please do it for Napoleon's wars?

  • @Baathist_Brawler_1565
    @Baathist_Brawler_1565 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Wow, what a trouncing, and just 50 years before Napoleon's France had casually swept aside the germans, conquering the Prussians in a mere 3 weeks. I think the French left behind the best of their race in Russia in 1812, they were never again the mighty force that had dominated Europe throughout the middle ages. This war was the nail in the coffin, and with the following instability and plummeting birthrates they sunk to become a mere spectator in history and have never again risen.

    • @ThePalaeontologist
      @ThePalaeontologist 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It is rather more complicated than that. You say the best of their race died in Russia, but that is not correct. Half the French Imperial Grande Armee wasn't even French, and it was always held together through punitive threats and fear. It was not this monolithic, 750,000 strong army of Frenchmen. Nope. A huge number of other, enthralled nationalities, were in league with the French but largely, not by choice.
      And do not forget, that in 1813, as merely 35,000 bedraggled Frenchmen limped back into Western Europe, with about 58,000 others whom had been in that once mighty army to enter Russia in 1812, that Napoleon Bonaparte achieved a great feat of logistics, recruiting literally over 400,000 new troops in that year. Were they as experienced as the ones he'd lost in droves in the Russian Winter of 1812? No, not a chance. But they would fight with some ferocious elan and determination in the years 1813-1815. Literally hundreds of thousands of them would die, but still.
      Also, lest we forget, the French sacrificed 1.75 million soldiers in the First World War (most of which, French, some of which, French Colonial; aka with nationalities as varied as what we'd now call Vietnamese, and many others, such as soldiers from Cameroon) I'd say that it was after the First World War, in which France was truly spent. Her feeble efforts in 1940, were no match for the Germans. Cue crying Frenchmen drumming up the sacrifice of 30,000 French troops in rearguard (also with about 10,000 British soldiers helping them, which is often forgotten/omitted on purpose; and ffs it was happening in France of course the French should have had the biggest defensive forces in the region out of the allies at that time) for Dunkirk.
      Well, as much as some Anglophobes would like to blame Britain for all of France collapsing in 6-7 weeks flat, the truth was, France was pretty cocky in the interwar years acting like the mightiest nation in the world, thanks to it's immense army which was 2nd only in size, then, to the Red Army in Soviet Russia. However, in the grand scheme of things, that was about 1 corps of French troops being chewed up against an entire German field army, to help Britain evacuate 123,000 Frenchmen and about twice as many British, off the beaches of Dunkirk. Yet also, do remember, that approximately 93% of the French whom the British rescued (leaving behind many of their own men to fit more Frenchmen on British ships instead; also losing a lot of British ships under constant Luftwaffe Stuka dive bomber attack) from Dunkirk, _went home to France_ after they were given the choice of repatriation, by the British government. Some may have joined the French Resistance, but quite frankly, the scale of how many French returned to France, made what the British had done seem pointless.
      Britain was only ever meant to be a reinforcing faction in the Northern sector, just like they were in WWI. It makes me laugh when French dudes get pissy about the Battle for France, as though the British just betrayed France and left it to the German wolves. Not true. It didn't happen that way at all. France was puffing up it's chest for over 20 years at that point. It had bullied Germany at the Treaty of Versailles (France, not Britain, was the most aggressive in pursuing reparations from Germany, to the tune of 100 Billion Deutschmarks; which it simply, could not afford, especially due to hyperinflation; as in, the value of 100 Billion Deutschmarks _prior to_ the hyper-inflation, not during or after it; aka at 1918/1919 rates there or thereabouts)
      Why French dudes cope and seethe about Britain being not as numerous militarily, is hilarious. It's as if the French think they have this god given right to sacrificing British lives on the altar of saving France. France doesn't even respect Britain and is a very poor ally in terms of how it behaves and how it goes about things. e.g. France sold EXOCET missiles to Argentina which Argentina used against British ships in the Falklands War in 1982. French nationalists still laugh about that to this day. It's a total disgrace. British servicemen _died_ on those ships. Fvck France.

  • @EightBit72
    @EightBit72 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Map inaccuracy: In those days Belgium did not include the eastern cantons with Eupen-Malmedy.

  • @Communist_Doggo_Mapping
    @Communist_Doggo_Mapping 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can u do a tutorial bc i need to impress my friends oh wait i don't have any friends but still can u do it?

  • @Noxitpies
    @Noxitpies 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good job man, i hope you can do the Sand War in the future

  • @thecouncilofthirteen2943
    @thecouncilofthirteen2943 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    No offense to you but if you make a casultie counter, dont just make it fit in a way its only accurate at the end of the war
    Either you actually try and make the counter realistic and accurate with corresponding battles, or you just leave it out

  • @RichardSchiffman-jn1ds
    @RichardSchiffman-jn1ds 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    I hope they make a movie about the Franco-Prussian war soon. I think it's high time they made one

    • @aka99
      @aka99 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There is a video about the danish Prussian war. Maybe watch as long as there is no movie about Franco Prussian war

    • @RichardSchiffman-jn1ds
      @RichardSchiffman-jn1ds 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@aka99 I know I've seen it. 1864. It was a Danish production but it had English subtitles. Very well made miniseries

    • @Social_Communism
      @Social_Communism 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Forget it there will be very less movies in which Germans win

  • @TheboyInPurple915
    @TheboyInPurple915 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you needle gun, very cool

  • @carband
    @carband 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's so accurate!

  • @pyotrcapaldi451
    @pyotrcapaldi451 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This War has 100% death rate
    Everyone dies in the end

  • @JacobFraps
    @JacobFraps 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Had no idea so many people died in this war

    • @cotefabrice1801
      @cotefabrice1801 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      french loses are like 60% captured. dead are similar to prussian

    • @Leprofdesinnoh
      @Leprofdesinnoh 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@cotefabrice1801 No actually France lost three times as many men as Germany. About 150k for France and 50k for Germany.

    • @cotefabrice1801
      @cotefabrice1801 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Leprofdesinnoh you’re right

  • @bryce2179
    @bryce2179 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Insane how in the video the number of french casualties excelerates towards the end, if that is somewhat similar to how things really went, its no wonder France gave up.

  • @thatsleepybirb
    @thatsleepybirb 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    really cool video! from other videos i’ve seen that red and blue either mean
    red: attacker/country that would end up losing the war
    blue: defender/country that would end up winning the war
    why did you make germany red in this case? obviously minor nitpick, this is incredible

  • @laurentquero3207
    @laurentquero3207 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    The encircled French imperial armies capitulated by decision of the emperor and were included in the losses, they were the only professional armies in the country
    the French republic was proclaimed and organized the defense of France with armies of volunteers not always well armed and extended the war by 6 months to the surprise of the Germans

    • @aksmex2576
      @aksmex2576 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes this is time they learnt that a smaller professional army is not as good as massive conscript army.
      Same reason why Soviets repelled a surprise German invasion - their conscription system.

    • @lester_the_molester
      @lester_the_molester 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@aksmex2576The Wehrmacht was a conscript army too…

    • @rbxless
      @rbxless 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@lester_the_molesterMaking an army of conscripts only amplifies the population differences of countries. The Soviets had a lot more manpower to throw at the Germans.

    • @lythd
      @lythd 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aksmex2576 i mean i certainly wouldnt ever boil something down to one factor, but in that case i feel like ur just wrong. the soviets were outnumbered for a huge portion of the war. i would say the biggest reason is just enough production to hold on and keep the oil, and the germans would run out and without fuel there wasnt much they could do anymore. supply would be another big reason too.

    • @richardthomas5362
      @richardthomas5362 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I suspect their lack of training is why French casualties were so much higher, once the professional French army was mostly used up.

  • @openlyracist8055
    @openlyracist8055 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Both armies reached over 1 million by the end, but French losses just were wild. The Germans cleave through the French like a hot knife in margarine.

    • @bunkerkorpf1440
      @bunkerkorpf1440 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Most of these losses were captured troops. Bad tactic and strategy lead to that...

    • @openlyracist8055
      @openlyracist8055 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@bunkerkorpf1440 so the French

    • @bunkerkorpf1440
      @bunkerkorpf1440 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@openlyracist8055 in 1870 and 1940, yes, huge French fails.
      Although it was also true for USSR in 1941, with millions of captured troops in less than 5 months, still USSR won.
      Bad tactic and strategy don't always mean defeat if you have time to adapt and if you are able to replace losses (France in 1914, USSR in 1941).
      France couldn't win in 1870 once it lost it professionnal army, especially since "Germany" had far more people...

    • @xoxoxoxo570
      @xoxoxoxo570 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@bunkerkorpf1440in 1870 both countries had around the same population around 40 million

    • @bunkerkorpf1440
      @bunkerkorpf1440 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@xoxoxoxo570 Wrong, in 1870 France had around 37 millions people, and a far less younger population than Germany. So, far less soldiers indeed (soldiers are always mostly young guys), while "Germany" (ie german states forming later german empire) had around 41 millions people, and a far younger population (indeed second half of 19th century was a demographic boom for german states).
      You should learn more about history

  • @LudosErgoSum
    @LudosErgoSum 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It's still mindboggling that the battle of Cape Ecnomus (256BCE) and battle of thr Red Cliffs (208-209CE) are possibly some of the largest naval engagaments in history with some 300.000 combined combatans and over a thousand of ships. Only in modern times are they ecplised by modern technology and wastly larger populations. It just goes to show how sophisticated and well-organized people were back in the day despite their lack of modern technology and engineering to accomplish such feats.

    • @karaltar7914
      @karaltar7914 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The battle of cape ecnomus is still to this day the largest naval battle of all time.

  • @qwertyui_uwu
    @qwertyui_uwu 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    very good

  • @bod-7268
    @bod-7268 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Atleast they didn't have to invade Belgium this time.

    • @neried
      @neried 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Cuz there were no maginot line back then

    • @staymadlilbroski
      @staymadlilbroski 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@neriedthey’re basicly was tbh

    • @jeetsamajdar3844
      @jeetsamajdar3844 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@neriedlets assume the french were the maginot line

    • @lahire4943
      @lahire4943 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@neriedThere was no Maginot line in 1914 either

  • @alansewell7810
    @alansewell7810 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    I didn't know much about this war. The Germans really drove deep. No wonder they tried it twice more.

  • @vataroku
    @vataroku 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    unnecessary to say this but, i learnt how to make these videos by you and the first map project i made used this music bruh.

  • @Russiaball878
    @Russiaball878 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How do you make these animated map

  • @DL-kf9wu
    @DL-kf9wu 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +118

    Imagine someone from our timeline goes back to the past and tells Bismarck how badly Germany/Prussia will be punished in the 20./21. century, I wonder how Bismarck would have felt.
    Kinda sad to see how much of Prussia and Prussian history got erased from the minds of the todays Germans when talking about modern history of Germany, which is of course caused (i am myself a german) because our own greed and by the harsh treaties of the both world wars. The world only remembers of Hitler when talking about German history but not of Otto von Bismarck:(

    • @neezduts_
      @neezduts_ 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      Sad indeed. Both are for propaganda reasons. Hitler was represented (and is) one of the most if not the most evil man ever. The Kaiser was also represented as evil and causing WW1 despite both of those being mostly untrue. The German empire should be remembered as more a lesson, not an evil force, as the only difference between it and the entente was that they were rival factions. The German empire was probably not be remembered in a good light for the foreseeable future, mostly because the Prussian militarism that eventually led to Versailles and Hitler was taken out of German culture as much as possible

    • @tricksor6589
      @tricksor6589 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      The treaty from WW2 was probably the best outcome for Germany, ever. Germany is now an economic powerhouse, 4th largest in the world and the main driving force of the EU and the European Bank. If anything, Imperial Germany's plans for Mitteleuropa and an economic bloc centred on Germany have been achieved.

    • @vanaik
      @vanaik 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Germany was even more of an economic powerhouse prior to the first/second world war and has risen time and again despite losing major industrial areas and paying tribute. On the other hand it's naive populism to equate EU institutions in which Germany has little voting rights to German dominance. Southern economies like Italy and Greece like to blame Germany for their misery but they have their own elites/politicians to thank for it. These countries are not even important markets for German goods but the idea that they are pawns in an imaginary game of German dominance via the EU seems to be more acceptable than just admitting reality. The word 'German centered economy' alone is strange as the EU is a free market without discrimination. No American would complain that the US economy was 'California centered' as it's clear how the US benefits from having free markets and successful member states that fund the budget.

    • @saebre.
      @saebre. 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I understand 20th but how are Germans harshly punished in the 21st century?

    • @russianfishich113
      @russianfishich113 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@neezduts_Nazi Germany killed 17 millions of USSR civilians. What is untrue? How do you think? I can't understand how people can be so disgusting.

  • @nick24488
    @nick24488 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Germany not going through belgium feels odd

  • @geokid317
    @geokid317 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    nice job

  • @TheeBritishGuy
    @TheeBritishGuy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What's the music that starts at 6:17

  • @carteradams43
    @carteradams43 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    seeing the German lines course through the French countryside like a snake was certainly something

    • @Divran22
      @Divran22 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The First Tour de France ^^

  • @Tadry
    @Tadry 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    I get the flags represent where the armies were but it really blocks the map where gains and losses are made, sometimes I can’t even tell at all what’s happening in some areas of the map.

    • @oicmapper
      @oicmapper 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Maybe he should make the flags more differenciable

  • @Temblizz
    @Temblizz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    In Germany we don't hear much about this war, most of us don't even know it. It's just weird than Germany formed around 1850 and we went to war with France 3 times in 100 years lol
    I'm glad the times have changed and our countries work together. Just sad that we didn't do it in times where we actually were strong af.

  • @doncomuna378
    @doncomuna378 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    *100 K* 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

  • @nahojnosslrak8807
    @nahojnosslrak8807 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    germans sure know their war. im pretty sure they were the actual protagonists of this story

    • @borisbrosowski6630
      @borisbrosowski6630 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well it was France that declared the war....

    • @DaoAncestor
      @DaoAncestor 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@borisbrosowski6630 the reason why they started made this to a big humilation after they lost 😂

    • @borisbrosowski6630
      @borisbrosowski6630 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don't believe the BS that politicians tell you through state-financed schoolbooks and teachers (esp in history). Prussia had founded the North-German Confederation which threatened to be a predecessor to a united Germany, something that France could not accept as a united Germany would be superior (as proven in the war). Thus N3 looked for an incident to break up the NGFederation and maintain an influence over the smaller german states in the south. This general french policy led later to WW1 and even was continued up until 1923 when France tried to establish a Rhine Republic. @@DaoAncestor

  • @geokid317
    @geokid317 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    also, mistake, i believe that france was the attacker in this war

    • @qwertyui_uwu
      @qwertyui_uwu 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      yes

    • @Sperenza2b
      @Sperenza2b 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      But provoked by Germans

    • @matheusexpedito4577
      @matheusexpedito4577 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Sperenza2byet the french attacked

    • @G.A.C_Preserve
      @G.A.C_Preserve 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Sperenza2b provoked by what exactly?

  • @patrickp.1001
    @patrickp.1001 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What a humiliation for the French back then and and the last of the 3 German wars of unification that gave rise to the German Empire lead by Prussia. That war truly changed the course of European history

  • @Qwerka
    @Qwerka 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you please do 1922 Battle of Sakarya?
    Please man it has been months

  • @nocturnalrecluse1216
    @nocturnalrecluse1216 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The Prussias of the time were a force to be reckoned with.

    • @anthonyluccini1015
      @anthonyluccini1015 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      All German states fought in this war which is why Prussia became the Germanic Empire

    • @bigfatchubbybritboy9445
      @bigfatchubbybritboy9445 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Revolutionary state of the art, cutting edge weapons and that's combined with equally modern, cutting edge new tactics etc Is why the Prussians were so effective.

  • @TRWFacty
    @TRWFacty 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    It's absloutely cursed seeing Germany push through Elsaß Lorraine even though I know the maginot didn't exist back then

  • @afaegawegahaserhserhsreh-hf2hr
    @afaegawegahaserhserhsreh-hf2hr 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How do you make these videos?

  • @thespaceguy1371
    @thespaceguy1371 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How long does it take to make your animations? Because mine take really long.

  • @frankbarron1907
    @frankbarron1907 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The French were toast.

    • @leveenntt
      @leveenntt 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      French toast? 🤔

  • @italiangarbageposting
    @italiangarbageposting 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    It would be so cool to have a FPS game set during the indipendence wars fought between 1848-71

  • @4Face840
    @4Face840 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can u do the war of 1956 and war of 1948

  • @fadehistoria75
    @fadehistoria75 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you do the Paris commune?

  • @fritoss3437
    @fritoss3437 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +119

    Reminder that Napoléon III was against this war, he should not be blamed for it

    • @genkupoke7064
      @genkupoke7064 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      True, nevertheless we can congrats Bismarck for this war. Such a great mastermind.
      Also there was some important figure in French society (such as Emile Zola) who was also against the war and protested about

    • @istandwithisraeI
      @istandwithisraeI 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      He started the war

    • @fritoss3437
      @fritoss3437 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@istandwithisraeI against his will

    • @istandwithisraeI
      @istandwithisraeI 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      @@fritoss3437 still started it over an insult

    • @fritoss3437
      @fritoss3437 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@istandwithisraeI he was forced bro this is not his choice

  • @austria-hungary7680
    @austria-hungary7680 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Imagine getting Napoleon to see this. The look on his face😂

  • @Luis_.-
    @Luis_.- 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very nice!

  • @chill2512
    @chill2512 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Paris Commune next video plz

  • @ninny65
    @ninny65 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I never realised how smashed the French were in this war, I knew it was bad but nothing to this degree

    • @lahire4943
      @lahire4943 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      The video is caricatural. It was far from a cakewalk for the Germans. The month of August was the deadliest month of fighting in Prussian history. The battles of Gravelotte and Mars-la-Tour were respectively 2nd and 3rd deadliest battles in Prussian history.
      Though they suffered horrendous casualties in the process, the Germans won because they were able to outmaneuver the French Imperial armies thanks to their large numerical superiority (550k vs 300k, I don't understand how the video claims that there were 700k French soldiers in late August, they had absolutely nowhere near that number, and the Germans had nowhere near 760k troops either). In August 1870, the French suffered about 61,000 casualties (including 37,000 killed or wounded) and the Germans close to 70,000 casualties (including 65,000 killed or wounded).
      Once the Empire fell, the Republic sent armies of untrained conscripts to fight the German veterans, which explains the final disproportion of losses.

    • @cpj93070
      @cpj93070 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lahire4943 🤡🤡You French are so funny, you can never admit when you are defeated seriously, you got your arses handed to you on a plate fair and square, and to think Napoleon III wanted Britain to join on there side. 😂

    • @marhaskalk
      @marhaskalk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@lahire4943
      because the author of this video just took the values for the entire conflict and applied them more or less at a linear rate, which is terrible historiography. at the outset of the war the german states had managed to mobilize over a million whereas the french were sitting at under 300,000. nothing in this video makes any historical sense

    • @brettvogel8418
      @brettvogel8418 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You can do some research yourself, as I don't want to write paragraphs here. It wasn't a cakewalk for the Prussians, as shown with the slow progression at times. But the Prussians had superior logistics, superior guns, and superior discipline in their forces. I think the French just don't like admitting Germany kicked their asses several times in its short history, so they come up with weak excuses for it lol.

  • @tonyhawk94
    @tonyhawk94 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Modern historians call it Franco-German war as the term Prussian is very incomplete, all of the German states fought.

    • @seanmacguire6898
      @seanmacguire6898 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Well almost all of them. Austria was still licking their wounds

    • @tonyhawk94
      @tonyhawk94 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@seanmacguire6898 Yeah but in any cases Austria at this point already diverged in terms on national destiny, everything was sealed after the Austro-Prussian war.
      I would argue that even before, regarding infrastructure development and natural barriers Austria was already a land of its own.

    • @jksimmons2009
      @jksimmons2009 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Modern historians do alot of stupid retconing

  • @sinanroyal5359
    @sinanroyal5359 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A question regarding shown casualties. Are these only military casualties or also including civilian ones? There are not German civilian casualties, since the war took place on French soil, but civilian casualties would explain the higher death ratio on the French side. During the times the Franco-Prussian war took place, people still saw the war not as a purely military conflict, but a "peoples war". The entire population was the enemy. Or is it that the French army got just completly outperformed by the Germans. Or both?

  • @user-kc8bo4il6k
    @user-kc8bo4il6k 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I used to think its a small campaign·····impressive