Collingwood on history: "The Idea of History"

Collingwood claimed that the historian must "re-enact" history, and that such a re-enactment is the only explanation needed for historical events. Sounds simple, but is it?
Today's video is about: Collingwood, R. G. (1946) The Idea of History. New York: Oxford University Press.
Recommended reading: Walsh, W. H. (1967) Philosophy of History. New York: Harper & Row.
My name is Jostein, I live in Norway, and work at Volda University College. Currently, I am doing a PhD in history. As part of my theoretical education (and because I like it), I read classics of history and historiography. In this channel, I hope to share my learning with you.

[@emmanuelchaves4855]

Thanks!

[@manjuchoudhary11]

I AM a history student from India.........your efforts is very appreciable
Thanks for.....

[@PrashantYadav-we4jr]

Your video was really good. As a student of history I must ask you to continue your endeavour

[@marianacarballidopalomino8306]

I'm a History student from México, I would love to know what you have to say about E.H Carr or Marc Bloch. thanks

[@anjamulislam6744]

Ok sir 🎉

[@TXMEDRGR]

I hope you continue to make videos.

[@Jimmylad.]

Amazing video thanks

[@sharma0824]

Sir , how Collingwood links with past with present ?
Can be explain it as
According to Collingwood , every historian looks upon past through his own present view and every historian has its own interpretation regarding a particular event
Is it true ?

[@Sunny.ankit0]

Well Harsh, by reenacting the sources, the primary ones are the one that links the past with the present.
and for the second, i think it is more precisely according to E.H. Carr.

[@Sunny.ankit0]

please let me know if you get the answer