Here’s the spark notes version: 1. As people in complex professions discover patterns and share knowledge, the need for high intelligence and great intuition are diminished by best practices and precise rules. 2. Startups with a truly unique differentiation and a smaller profit margin are much more likely to replace incumbents. Established companies tend to compete for more profitable areas. 3. Don’t segment customers by human characteristics but by the jobs a product or service accomplishes for them. The data points draws a much deeper cause and effect.
Here’s the spark notes version:
1. As people in complex professions discover patterns and share knowledge, the need for high intelligence and great intuition are diminished by best practices and precise rules.
2. Startups with a truly unique differentiation and a smaller profit margin are much more likely to replace incumbents. Established companies tend to compete for more profitable areas.
3. Don’t segment customers by human characteristics but by the jobs a product or service accomplishes for them. The data points draws a much deeper cause and effect.
Very well thought out. Excellent perspective.
This here is what you call audio gold
1.5x speed is useful
🤣
The 25 ppl who dislike this video are dinosaurs who haven’t realized they have been disrupted some time ago
Very interesting perspective about the disruption on innovation.
Any favorite quotes?
Blew my mind
How do they get disrupted!?
It's almost 7 years now.
Is Solar power cost competitive now?😀
He's basically talking about game theory.
Mild mannered man but has a lot of brilliant ideas in here
R.i.p mate
Tesla😆🚀
Gotta mention "Harvard" like 3 times, ay
Don't think he gets an affiliate fee, unfortunately ;)
He was wrong on both Tesla and Solar Power, so I am not sure what he is talking about.
Every theory needs updates - and Clayton updates his theory of disruption regularly!
Is he really wrong?
Meh...