To be fair (with a bit of a stretch), he did say " worst cars in America" not 'worst cars made in America'. Both the Capri and Stag WERE available for sale in North America. I'd be more offended by the fact that we ALL clicked because Jay Leno was standing infront of a weird car , and neither Jay not the weird car were featured in the video. Outright deceptive thumbnails always irk me more than manipulative titles. At least it didn't seem to have AI-bot narration. That shit's gonna get me off TH-cam soon.
I couldn’t even finish watching it.. Pretty sad, using a lotta words but not saying much.. And what’s up with the Capri during the Pinto segment.? 🤦♂️
In Europe it was a Ford Capri, and they were immensely popular - specially in Britain. The American version, called Mercury Capri, was partly ruined by regulations and the accountants at Ford.
The 1976 thru 1979 Cadillac Seville is gorgeous. My neighbor owns his Grandmother's Cream exterior/interior and vinyl top 1977 Seville with 30,000 miles on the odometer. It is a beautiful car.
Actually I rebuilt my Vega engine and put in a block with steel sleeves. Also added a rebuilt head. It worked fine after that. The other stupid thing GM did was mate a cast iron head with an aluminum block. Expansion and contraction of the two were not compatible so loss of compression was possible.
Exploding Pintos, Cadilacs with the trunk chopped off, A Gremlin was just a Hornet with the trunk chopped off, the Pacer was a fishbowl on wheels, the Caddy 4*6*8, and the HT4100, probably the two worst engines ever, the California edition Vette. ... My dad parked his 69 Skylark in the garage and got a Pinto to drive to work during the OPEC embargo when there were gas lines. He only had it for about a month and traded it for a VW Bug. He hated the Pinto, there was no headroom, and his knee hit the dashboard every time he let the clutch out. No such issues with the Bug.
Pinto: Yes, the Pinto gas tank would rupture if the back of the car was hit hard enough. Other than that, everything said about the Pinto in this video is lying or made up BS. The Pinto was actually a good car. And they were made with most of the same parts as all the other Ford models cars and trucks. The engines were different from other Ford models; however, they were appropriate for the size and weight of the three Pinto models. Both engines for the '71-'73 model years were excellent as both were tough and held-up for well over 100K miles. Yes, the 1.6L engine was somewhat poky, but that engine's intention, high-gas-mileage was phenomenal! The 1.6L engine was sourced from England as that engine had been powering English and European Fords. Nobody complained over there. The 2.0L engine was sourced from Germany. And again, that engine powered German and European Fords. And nobody complained over there. In 1975 Ford dropped the two European engines in favor of the Pinto having a single engine choice, a 2.3L American engine. And I recall that there were problems with that engine. Message to: TO LEARN MORE: You need to change the name of your channel because you're idiots and you're spreading incorrect and misinformation. That especially angers me because young people look on YT to learn about things automotive as well as gain an education to be able to repair their vehicle. And here you are unwilling to educate yourselves, spreading incorrect and misinformation. I'm not bothering to watch the remainder of you video here. I'm sure it will sicken me further because I hate when people harm young people.
I had a 1977 Pinto and never had any problems with it. The 2.3 engine was used for years and was even turbocharged later and I'm not aware that it had any issues.
I had a Pinto for two whole weeks. $300 bucks. Threw a rod on the freeway at about 60 mph. A faded red with lavish brown vinyl interior lol. Actually one of the many shitboxes Ive had that I wish I still did have.
Speaking strictly to body-design, I always thought the AMC Matador was a stunning car. I very much liked all of the later AMC vehicles, such as the Gremlin and the Pacer. They were to 'futuristic' what the Chrysler PT Cruiser and Prowler were to 'retro'. Neither AMC nor Chrysler quite hit those marks, but if you got it, you got it. I guess I 'got' the Matador's body styling even if no one else did.
I have no idea what Ford in America did to the 1.6 OHC engine for it to only develop 54hp, while in Europe the 1.6 OHC (pinto) engine used in the 1970 British Ford Cortina mk3 from the same era developed 88 bhp
That white car is a Capri which did NOT suffer the issues the Pinto over in America did. IF YOU’RE GOING TO GO TO THE TROUBLE OF MAKING VIDEOS THEN ENSURE YOU DON’T DISENFRANCHISE YOUR VEIWERSHIP BY POOR EDITING AND PRODUCTION. IT’LL BE YOUR LOSS. Next….
At one time, a friend of mine owned a Pinto. We took turns driving. It was almost as tough a car as I have ever driven. There were very few cars that you could downshift from fourth into second gear at sixty mph and get away with it. I never noticed any of the shortcomings mentioned in this video. The only thing bad about it was the vulnerability of its gas tank and you would not notice that until it was too late. So, for that one flaw, you are inclined to heap further abuse on what was an otherwise good car? Can you say "Corvair?" I can and I do.
AMC Matador...a worthy successor to the ugly Nash cars of the 50's. Cadillac Saville...considered small in it's day. What Cadillac should have been. Cadillac Cimaron...the car that killed the Cadillac name to this day. The thumbnail is Jay Leno with the 1999 Revival Packard. Good idea, bad design.
My mother, who was generally savy when it came to buying cars. For some reason was very fond of her Caddilac Cimmeron, one could say she loved that piece of junk. When it broke down we'd say " Get rid of that piece of crap 💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩." Was not worth putting anymore money in. But, no! Eventually she lost her license, but still caught her taking it for a drive illegally. Imagine an aging women with advancing dementia illegally driving s crap Cimmeron! Eventually after unsuccessfully trying to sell it, she sold it to a junk yard for like 50.00 usd.
So the Stag at 145bhp with a 3.0 V8 is underwhelming, for 76 that wasn't too bad, but considering Cadillac could only manage 43bhp more with 2.7l more. You'd of expected more like 280-300bhp with that engine size. And yet the also underwhelming Cavalier managed 80bhp with only 1.8l, which I suspect was the same engine in the Vauxhall Cavalier, so an extra 4.9l and 4 cylinders needed for 108bhp increase. Some of the American V8 power figures back then were shocking.
Cimarron and cavalier cars presented here are just an americanisation of a GM model of its européen local brand : OPEL (vauxhall in Uk). That shows the difficulties of américan car industry to face the unplaned evolution of this market at that time. From France.
I had that Cadillac Seville, nothing but wiring problems. I live in Canada, & those fools used aluminum wiring. It gets extremely brittle in cold weather….🤨….
The pinto was a great car for little money. The 1600 was a British engine and not so good but the German 2000 engine was really good. The 1974 Matadors made great muscle cars and super sleepers. Some Gremlins too.
Ford sold over four million Pintos in 10 years so they weren't that bad. Most of your info on the Pinto is flat out wrong. I had a 1977 Pinto and never had any problems with it. They were not any less safe than other small cars of the 1970s.
The car with number 71 on it, is a Capri... A very popular Ford model overhere in Europe where it originated. I also think people did not buy a Pinto if they were after an exciting ride... It is true it was not the best Ford either. I do not believe the Saville should be part of this list. I think it was quite a step forward for Cadillac. Neither is a Stag a bad car. It suffered from engine problems, that can be solved. The quality of this 'documentary' is at the very least questionable. To me it is in the list of the 5 Worst Documentaries on TH-cam.
What has a Ford Capri got to do with a Pinto ? The Matador is just pig-ugly. Speaking of ugly.......that Cadillac must've been designed the morning after a heavy party.The dimensions are laughable.As for the Cimarron...... WTF ? The designers were on bad drugs,or just taking the piss. The Triumph Stag was victim to the US drivers penchant for poor maintainence. Today (7/24) there are many thousands still on the road in the UK,Europe & Australia in particular. Poor cars don't survive. The survival rate of the Stag suggests the reputation as presented here is unwarrented.
6:36 The Seville may have been an overpriced reskinned Chevy Nova, but it was new and exciting for Cadiddle-Yak's legacy customers, and the strategic use of Sevilles as loaners when the customers brought their dreadnoughts in fo service sold a heck of a lot of them. And you think the Seville was bad, take a look at the Lincoln Granada --- I mean Versailles.
Yikes. Inaccurate much? Only 2 mins in and you're showing a Mercury Capri while talking about how awful the Ford Pinto was. If you or your editor don't know the difference between those two cars, you might consider doing something else.
The pinto was a pretty good car. I knew several people who owned one. Including my brother. Not one I ever knew that owned one ever complained about them. Now if you would have featured a chevy vega. Then your video would have more credibility.
The caddie Seville was not even as luxurious as a bottom end Buick of the time. The caddie Cimarron was a horrible example of badge engineering. It wasn't even luxurious enough to be called a cadillac.
The placement of the fuel tank in the Pinto was common on many cars before the current safety standards. In one of my early text books it as stated that modern cars have a 100 hp engine. and many arars had even less. The early vw's had only 36 hp. And exceleration standard of 0 to 60 was almost 20 SECONDS. Also braking distances would not meet our 21 21 century standard so looking back at a car made in earlier times would be a bad time when compared to now. in 1950 a 17 gallon fuel tank was common with a 250 or so range. You could use modern standards compared to earlier times makes all cars look like the worst. I loved my 41 Pontiac with a flat head 6. or 1940 Studebaker with a similar engine. So be careful how comparison are made.
![[Live] : ONE 168 วันนี้!! "โจนาธาน vs ซุปเปอร์เล็ก"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0jIN65KgJsI/mqdefault.jpg)
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 78 | คู่เอก "ปกรณ์ vs ฟาบิโอ"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LSOmgl0Th2c/mqdefault.jpg)
what cars do you like? leave a comment under this video📝
Back in '89 my siblings bought a '76 Cadillac seville,I liked it but the fuel injection circuit kept blowing fuses.
The downsized Cadillac Seville built in 1975-79 was Cadillac's Division counterpart to the contemporary Chevrolet Nova.
Having a picture that appears to be Jay Leno in front of a rather weird car is very misleading.... then turns into a Pinto... click bait.
the channel liked your insult
@@bellemorelock4924 The channel is a computer program.
I had 2 Pintos & couldnt complain about either! They got me to work & back for years!
I had a 1977 Pinto and never had any problems with it.
I've owned four Pinto's, and a Mercury Bobcat. All were excellent cars.
I had a 1977 Pinto and never had any problems with it.
worst cars in america, after 2 minutes it shows a Ford Capri made in Germany .... and car number 1 was made in the UK
Nothing screams American car quite like a right side steering wheel
To be fair (with a bit of a stretch), he did say " worst cars in America" not 'worst cars made in America'. Both the Capri and Stag WERE available for sale in North America. I'd be more offended by the fact that we ALL clicked because Jay Leno was standing infront of a weird car , and neither Jay not the weird car were featured in the video. Outright deceptive thumbnails always irk me more than manipulative titles.
At least it didn't seem to have AI-bot narration. That shit's gonna get me off TH-cam soon.
You can't compare a Pinto to a Capri. Capri's were much better cars.
Capri was made in the UK too
Agreed, the Capri was a good car completely unrelated to the pinto and shouldn’t be in the video. The Capri was also assembled in Oz.
While badmouthing the Pinto, why did you show images of the Capri?
Since when is a Triumph Stag an American car?
Since the narrator is AI...
@@imrytebeehyneu Exactly.
Here is said "in America", not "American".
I couldn’t even finish
watching it..
Pretty sad, using a lotta words but not saying much.. And what’s up with the Capri during the Pinto segment.? 🤦♂️
The #71 white car is not a Pinto. It’s a Mercury Capri.
Could be an Australian pinto.it had Ford Cortina motor in it
The pinto should have remained a bean and never evolved into a vehicle
The Matador was a cruddy car that looked like an undernourished Ford Torino
In Europe it was a Ford Capri, and they were immensely popular - specially in Britain. The American version, called Mercury Capri, was partly ruined by regulations and the accountants at Ford.
Cadillac Seville shown ws most certainly not one of the worst American cars.
What a load of bull
Why did you show a white Mercury Capri with a “71” painted on the doors when you were talking about the Ford Pinto from 1:57 to roughly 2:53 ?
The 1976 thru 1979 Cadillac Seville is gorgeous. My neighbor owns his Grandmother's Cream exterior/interior and vinyl top 1977 Seville with 30,000 miles on the odometer. It is a beautiful car.
Some narrators really should learn how to pronounce some of these model names.
It's a _robot AI fake voice._ "..soi soi soi soi soi..."
Funny you didn't mention the Chevy Vega.
The Vega was a dog. My father said it almost used as much oil as it did gas. He sold it after 3 months.
He rags on the Pinto because it's easy to do that. But the Vega was actually a really bad car, unlike the Pinto.
Actually I rebuilt my Vega engine and put in a block with steel sleeves. Also added a rebuilt head. It worked fine after that. The other stupid thing GM did was mate a cast iron head with an aluminum block. Expansion and contraction of the two were not compatible so loss of compression was possible.
Horrid video. Makes 3 points about each car and then repeats ad nauseum.
Exploding Pintos, Cadilacs with the trunk chopped off, A Gremlin was just a Hornet with the trunk chopped off, the Pacer was a fishbowl on wheels, the Caddy 4*6*8, and the HT4100, probably the two worst engines ever, the California edition Vette. ... My dad parked his 69 Skylark in the garage and got a Pinto to drive to work during the OPEC embargo when there were gas lines. He only had it for about a month and traded it for a VW Bug. He hated the Pinto, there was no headroom, and his knee hit the dashboard every time he let the clutch out. No such issues with the Bug.
Pinto: Yes, the Pinto gas tank would rupture if the back of the car was hit hard enough. Other than that, everything said about the Pinto in this video is lying or made up BS.
The Pinto was actually a good car. And they were made with most of the same parts as all the other Ford models cars and trucks. The engines were different from other Ford models; however, they were appropriate for the size and weight of the three Pinto models. Both engines for the '71-'73 model years were excellent as both were tough and held-up for well over 100K miles. Yes, the 1.6L engine was somewhat poky, but that engine's intention, high-gas-mileage was phenomenal! The 1.6L engine was sourced from England as that engine had been powering English and European Fords. Nobody complained over there. The 2.0L engine was sourced from Germany. And again, that engine powered German and European Fords. And nobody complained over there. In 1975 Ford dropped the two European engines in favor of the Pinto having a single engine choice, a 2.3L American engine. And I recall that there were problems with that engine.
Message to: TO LEARN MORE: You need to change the name of your channel because you're idiots and you're spreading incorrect and misinformation. That especially angers me because young people look on YT to learn about things automotive as well as gain an education to be able to repair their vehicle. And here you are unwilling to educate yourselves, spreading incorrect and misinformation. I'm not bothering to watch the remainder of you video here. I'm sure it will sicken me further because I hate when people harm young people.
I thought it was just me!
I had a 1977 Pinto and never had any problems with it. The 2.3 engine was used for years and was even turbocharged later and I'm not aware that it had any issues.
How is Triumph an American car?
I had a Pinto for two whole weeks. $300 bucks. Threw a rod on the freeway at about 60 mph. A faded red with lavish brown vinyl interior lol. Actually one of the many shitboxes Ive had that I wish I still did have.
I wonder if Jay Leno is aware of the abuse of his person on this channel???
Poorly concieved inaccurate video. Two thumbs down.
2- more thumbs down here too!
There was a lot of misinformation.
Speaking strictly to body-design, I always thought the AMC Matador was a stunning car. I very much liked all of the later AMC vehicles, such as the Gremlin and the Pacer. They were to 'futuristic' what the Chrysler PT Cruiser and Prowler were to 'retro'. Neither AMC nor Chrysler quite hit those marks, but if you got it, you got it. I guess I 'got' the Matador's body styling even if no one else did.
The Seville was just a option loaded Chevy Nova...
Designed by Bill Mitchell, GM's Legendary Car Designer for over 50 Years at GM !
No one would be upset if a picture does not move for a second ;)
Tighten up your writing. Points are being repeated too much!
My '75 Pinto was a good car, especially after I bored out the 4 cylinder. It was factory modded for fuel tank issue.
I had a 1977 Pinto and never had any problems with it. The 1976 and later Pintos had the gas tank fixed and there was a recall for the earlier cars.
video could be half as long. Kept repeating things 2 and 3 times.
Don’t forget how popular and successful the Pinto was! You NEVER see one nowadays..
Why do I keep watching these shows that repeat and repeat everything?
pinto fuel tank design...ok i get it. once is enough!😮
I've owned in my younger days a,72 pinto with a Cortina motor the previous owner put in it,a 74 matador,and a 74 Triumph spitfire.
probably emission controls
I have no idea what Ford in America did to the 1.6 OHC engine for it to only develop 54hp, while in Europe the 1.6 OHC (pinto) engine used in the 1970 British Ford Cortina mk3 from the same era developed 88 bhp
That white car is a Capri which did NOT suffer the issues the Pinto over in America did.
IF YOU’RE GOING TO GO TO THE TROUBLE OF MAKING VIDEOS THEN ENSURE YOU DON’T DISENFRANCHISE YOUR VEIWERSHIP BY POOR EDITING AND PRODUCTION. IT’LL BE YOUR LOSS.
Next….
The matador was just plain Ugly.
Quite pretty for a Yank Tank.
@@Ozcrazy49 Tank is right.
Why are you showing a Capri when talking about a Pinto?
Worst clickbait in America
I owned 2 pintos during the 70s and both were great cars.
I had a 1977 Pinto and never had any problems with it.
I had a Pinto. It wasn't bad for me.
I had a 1977 Pinto and never had any problems with it.
Sim R An?
The cimmaron is a European car! Its a re badged GM product of Opel the Ascona or in the UK Vauxhall cavelair
At one time, a friend of mine owned a Pinto. We took turns driving. It was almost as tough a car as I have ever driven. There were very few cars that you could downshift from fourth into second gear at sixty mph and get away with it. I never noticed any of the shortcomings mentioned in this video. The only thing bad about it was the vulnerability of its gas tank and you would not notice that until it was too late. So, for that one flaw, you are inclined to heap further abuse on what was an otherwise good car? Can you say "Corvair?" I can and I do.
Learn to pronounce the names right before opening your mouth
It’s an AI voice. It doesn’t know proper pronunciation or inflection. While it is Artificial, I’d hardly call it Intelligence.
AMC Matador...a worthy successor to the ugly Nash cars of the 50's.
Cadillac Saville...considered small in it's day. What Cadillac should have been.
Cadillac Cimaron...the car that killed the Cadillac name to this day.
The thumbnail is Jay Leno with the 1999 Revival Packard. Good idea, bad design.
Why is the narrator yelling 😂😂
This is ridiculous, now I know what it's like watching a train wreck.
Nothing to do with the cars.
My mother, who was generally savy when it came to buying cars. For some reason was very fond of her Caddilac Cimmeron, one could say she loved that piece of junk. When it broke down we'd say " Get rid of that piece of crap 💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩." Was not worth putting anymore money in. But, no! Eventually she lost her license, but still caught her taking it for a drive illegally. Imagine an aging women with advancing dementia illegally driving s crap Cimmeron! Eventually after unsuccessfully trying to sell it, she sold it to a junk yard for like 50.00 usd.
The Matador is seen as the worst car. Meanwhile in the movie ' The Man with the Golden Gun? '
The lapd once chose the matador fir their squad
no wrost cars all good cars 👌🏿👌🏿🚗🚗
Matador design is cool imo. A funky 70s one, but not so much
Number four is wondeful , Matador is beatiful.
I had a pinto.
So the Stag at 145bhp with a 3.0 V8 is underwhelming, for 76 that wasn't too bad, but considering Cadillac could only manage 43bhp more with 2.7l more. You'd of expected more like 280-300bhp with that engine size. And yet the also underwhelming Cavalier managed 80bhp with only 1.8l, which I suspect was the same engine in the Vauxhall Cavalier, so an extra 4.9l and 4 cylinders needed for 108bhp increase. Some of the American V8 power figures back then were shocking.
this must be one of the worst edidted videos I have ever seen.
Cimarron and cavalier cars presented here are just an americanisation of a GM model of its européen local brand : OPEL (vauxhall in Uk). That shows the difficulties of américan car industry to face the unplaned evolution of this market at that time. From France.
Glad I didn't waste time watching the whole mess
The Cadillac Seville was and remains a well liked car
I had that Cadillac Seville, nothing but wiring problems. I live in Canada, & those fools used aluminum wiring. It gets extremely brittle in cold weather….🤨….
Nothing new here, and quite a lot that is inaccurate. The criticisms of these vehicles could have been made of many if not most vehicles of the era.
LOL I owned both several new Pintos and Cimmeron models both great cars
Betty White Drove a powder Blue 77 Cadillac Seville , She Drove the Car till She passed away..
Ah! The Pinto Blow-a-Bout
why do you show a completely different European Mercury Capri with the #71 on the door?
The pinto was a great car for little money. The 1600 was a British engine and not so good but the German 2000 engine was really good. The 1974 Matadors made great muscle cars and super sleepers. Some Gremlins too.
Unless the stag had had a Hart racing conversation. Ive had 4
In the Pinto section, why show a Capri while describing the Pinto
The Cadillac Cimmeron was just an Optioned up Chevy Celebrity..
Ford sold over four million Pintos in 10 years so they weren't that bad. Most of your info on the Pinto is flat out wrong. I had a 1977 Pinto and never had any problems with it. They were not any less safe than other small cars of the 1970s.
2 mins in not a pinto but a Ford Capri!
At 2min the video shows a German Ford Capri instead of an American Pinto. 😉
The car with number 71 on it, is a Capri... A very popular Ford model overhere in Europe where it originated. I also think people did not buy a Pinto if they were after an exciting ride... It is true it was not the best Ford either. I do not believe the Saville should be part of this list. I think it was quite a step forward for Cadillac. Neither is a Stag a bad car. It suffered from engine problems, that can be solved. The quality of this 'documentary' is at the very least questionable. To me it is in the list of the 5 Worst Documentaries on TH-cam.
What has a Ford Capri got to do with a Pinto ? The Matador is just pig-ugly. Speaking of ugly.......that Cadillac must've been designed the morning after a heavy party.The dimensions are laughable.As for the Cimarron...... WTF ? The designers were on bad drugs,or just taking the piss. The Triumph Stag was victim to the US drivers penchant for poor maintainence. Today (7/24) there are many thousands still on the road in the UK,Europe & Australia in particular. Poor cars don't survive. The survival rate of the Stag suggests the reputation as presented here is unwarrented.
The White 71 is the Ford Mercury Capri not the Ford Pinto.
6:36 The Seville may have been an overpriced reskinned Chevy Nova, but it was new and exciting for Cadiddle-Yak's legacy customers, and the strategic use of Sevilles as loaners when the customers brought their dreadnoughts in fo service sold a heck of a lot of them.
And you think the Seville was bad, take a look at the Lincoln Granada --- I mean Versailles.
Pinto is not a Capri.
My first car was a 74 pinto station wagon. Baby shit brown with fake woodgrain paneling. It was a real chick magnet for sure.
Probably a collector's car now 😃😃😃
At 10:15 it is a Sim-A-Ron, not a Si-Marr-Un.
And they did not even come close to spelling correctly in the text. What a joke!
Well, as soon as this video got to the Cadillac Seville, I had to stop watching. This was a great and successful car.
There are 4 cars worse then the Pinto ? 😂
Yikes. Inaccurate much? Only 2 mins in and you're showing a Mercury Capri while talking about how awful the Ford Pinto was. If you or your editor don't know the difference between those two cars, you might consider doing something else.
most liked the baby cat, it did sell alots
The Cadillac seville 1976 was the best car which was made in iran
The AMC Matador fastback was driven by the villains in the film The Man With The Golden Gun
Wasn't it an AMC Hornet not a Matador?
That rebranded Cavalier Caddy was a _Cimmeron,_ not a "Samaran." And I don't approve of AI robotic voices.
The pinto was a pretty good car. I knew several people who owned one. Including my brother. Not one I ever knew that owned one ever complained about them. Now if you would have featured a chevy vega. Then your video would have more credibility.
I had a 1977 Pinto and never had any problems with it. The Vega really was actual krap.
Cimarron, not Samaran! 😂
The caddie Seville was not even as luxurious as a bottom end Buick of the time. The caddie Cimarron was a horrible example of badge engineering. It wasn't even luxurious enough to be called a cadillac.
Wrong year pinto also capri shown as pinto
Poor job
Clickbait warning!
This video is so bad it needs a thumbnail from a car that isn't being talked about by a celebrity who has nothing to do with it.
at 2m30 the Ford Capri is not a Ford Pinto ...
Hope this guy has a day job. He sure screwed this program up.
But the matador was in a james bond film
1:57...that's not a Pinto!
The placement of the fuel tank in the Pinto was common on many cars before the current safety standards. In one of my early text books it as stated that modern cars have a 100 hp engine. and many arars had even less. The early vw's had only 36 hp. And exceleration standard of 0 to 60 was almost 20 SECONDS. Also braking distances would not meet our 21
21 century standard so looking back at a car made in earlier times would be a bad time when compared to now. in 1950 a 17 gallon fuel tank was common with a 250 or so range. You could use modern standards compared to earlier times makes all cars look like the worst. I loved my 41 Pontiac with a flat head 6. or 1940 Studebaker with a similar engine. So be careful how comparison are made.
I had a 1977 Pinto and never had any problems with it. They were good cars for the 1970s.
Spell it correctly, it's Cimmaron, not Samrin.
Those cars were really bad. Pinto
I had a 1977 Pinto and never had any problems with it.
Fake wire wheels on the Caddy. What's not to like.................
Good video always succes for you
no vega?