You got to love the older war films, practical effects and every soldier an actual man in uniform, just so much grander and better than having to rely on CGI which tends to note age well at all and looks dated by the time it comes out.
CGI are only used when the movie makes don't have enough budget if you realized these movies have stunt men which have to act dead. which cost a lot of money not to mention the horses the set etc.
It's certainly noticeable how much better the pre-2000 movies were at telling a visual story. Not sure if CGI is to blame, but I suspect much of the darkness, confusion and shaky cam in the newer movies may be to hide too obvious CGI
Waterloo is one of my favourite war movies because of the sheer scale of the scenes and that everyone you see is an actor. I wouldn't be surprised if the number of actors are the same as the soldiers who took part in the wars.
@@bigsoap186 Much more than that, my friend. Before filming even started, the Russian field engineers rebuilt the entire battlefield to exact specifications of houses and mud roads and hills and slopes. Everything. A massive undertaking as we are talking more than 20 square kilometers of landscape and buildings and what not. And add to that the artillerymen and infantrymen alongside the cavalrymen. On BOTH sides. We are talking at least 2 army sized units taking part in the battle scenes plus all the logistics and food and quarters for the soldiers between filming the scenes, and the aforementioned engineering work. And there is even more to it than the scenes and the filming. All these soldiers had to be taught the tactics and strategies and combat methods of the Napoleonic wars and then train it several times to make sure it worked as planned before dunning the French and German and British uniforms of the time. All of these many thousand Russian troops of every kind deserves a huge applause and admiration. Because they carried the movie, and there wouldn't have been a movie if they didn't work so hard to make it right. I know that we in the west are not particularly fond of praising Russian soldiers, but these soldiers doing such a huge effort and showing such dedication really are a pride to Russia.
Nobody could really equal the Waterloo-movie from 1970 until today....Its so intense and full of little details that its really umatched. A pity that there was never a directors cut or an extended version.
That movie is also just a tale. Hollywood-shit. It happened, ok. Had a big part of the history of the anglosaxons, new guys in Europe, not to large and famous history... Peoples (not NATIONS, not at all) with 600-800 years history. A part prooved, the other lied... As used at the anglo-saxons with collonies... If you are interested about a brave, the only in Europe, just start to learn reading and read books about scithian.parthian.hun.maghiars-hungarians. And try to learn from them. You will see, is a good idea...
Loved all of these movies! Glory had the most amazing ending I have ever seen in a war movie. It was like seeing a classical painting in real time, merged with symphonic music, exploding out of violence with a horrible outcome.
Glory's ending really drove home the point of the film: Not only are there things worth fighting for, but there are some things that are worth DYING for.
Unfortunately, whenever we talk about greatest movies of all time, we all assume it’s got to be a Hollywood film. The same gentleman who directed Waterloo (Steiger is the best Napoleon ever) also directed possibly the greatest film (any genre) of all time. War and Peace 1966 was sponsored by the Soviet Union to show up Hollywood’s version in 1956 (Fonda and Hepburn). Director Sergei Bondarchuk (who also stars in the film) was given almost unlimited control to produce in my opinion, the finest pre CGI film period. Like the novel, the film is also quite long with heavy character build up between battles. The Borodino segment is the finest battle sequence of any war film….period. War and Peace in it’s entirety is a Soviet Masterpiece that can only be found on the Criterion channel.
Сам фильм безусловно хорош, но вот батальные сцены сняты не реалистично. Без компьютерной графики вообще вряд-ли было возможно сделать реалистично. Очень жаль, что у Бондарчука не было тогда такого инструмента.
Movies like Waterloo Alamo were all 20+ years old by the time I was born & they’re still better than many movies made today 2023! You just can’t beat real special effects and real individual people even with the best cgi. Just captures the viewers attention so well even now
I’ve seen Glory and it was a great movie out of all of these I’ve seen The battle of Crater more like the Massacre at the Crater cause Union soldiers got slaughtered And they were told by the General go around the crater don’t go into it which due to the damage being done at the crater the men were shocked had sympathy for the enemy and decided to help the wounded
@@jameswilliams3241 correct They chose him by drawing straws, stupid decision but the other officers had more experience then he did and didn’t order his men to go around it but the sympathy for the Union when they saw the dead and dying they had to do what they could there humanity to help the wounded the greedy to take souvenirs. Lead to the unfortunate deaths of so many men basically in Cold Mountain phrase “a turkey shoot”
Superheroes are awesome but what i really wanna see is a connected movie series about the napoleonic wars. It'll all end in waterloo like endgame does. Also they all need to be rated R because nobody's going to understand why cavalry was so effective at the time until they see arms and legs flying off from the sabers, skulls being crushed by hooves.
Maybe a series about Napoleon would be an good idea. There’s certainly enough material and Napoleon is such an fascinating character. As long as Ridley Scott stays as far away as possible from it, it could work if you find the right actors and respect the historical reality
Ain’t nuthin like the fresh smell of blackpowder and blood in the morning I live for battles like this just you and a musket against the Hordes of Hell
I watched a documentary one time about the siege of Petersburg, or the battle of the creator, the Union Commanding General in charge of the assault made his men practice for the attack while ex-miners and trench diggers dug that tunnel under the CSA trench, but after the explosion and the attack commenced, the Union forces did not expect to run into a the massive creater or the wall of dirt that stopped them dead in their tracks, at that point it wasn't much of a battle but more of a massacre
That battle was lost to the Union the minute they started to run forward. Every soldier who knew something about movement and close combat would have been able to tell the commanding officer that they needed to attack on each side of the crater and NOT run down into the crater. They litterally became the proverbial sitting ducks when they did that. The officer who sent them into the crater has to have been a total amateur.
@@Jens-Viper-Nobel in that we are in agreement, but if the commanding general in charge of the siege would have watch and took command like he should have instead of hiding and drinking whiskey then the siege at Petersburg would have been different than it turned out to be
Even though Ft. Wagner was never taken, the 54th enmasse got the closest. Never underestimate the power of men who will do anything for a commander they respect, but more than that... a commander they love.
Waterloo- Britain and Prussia vs France Anglo-Sudan war- Britain and Ottomans vs Arabic’s The battle of Alamo- Mexican Empire vs Texas American civil war (Siege of Petersburg)- America vs the Slave states American Revolution- Britain vs America, French Empire and Spanish Empire British Civil war- Scotland vs Britain American Civil war (Battle of Richmond, Virginia(End of the civil war)- America vs Slave states Japanese Civil war(Battle of Kyūsuū)- Japan vs the Satsuma Rebellion French and Indian war (North America(Ambush)- France vs the Mohicans (Indians) American Civil war (Second battle of Fort Wagner, South Carolina)- America vs Slave states
it feels Truly Amazing if hearing those muskets Canons go BOOM N BANG watching dozens or hundreds of Men die its deadly but Satisfying to watch in Amaze.
The good thing is that with CGI movie horse don’t die… Charge of the Light Brigade etc… Any film, pre CGI, with horses usually sees fatalities something, especially true, with Waterloo😪❤️
In the Last of the Mohicans when the British left the fort in reality they had to give up their arms to the French and were completely helpless when the Native Americans were attacked them.
As a french i Can Say Waterloo IS a very very good movie who showed the french deafeat , but english deafeat was near too , and the prussia Come ect , very nice movie
Wars were fought that brutally before modern times, I wonder if the higher tech, fancier but deadlier weapons today make it more terrifying than actually facing your enemy like back then.
Napoleon didn't have any wish to dominate Europe. It's the allies that faced him with continual war, and Napoleon took advantage from their losses. The only solution was then to dominate continental Europe to isolate UK. Napoleon proposed peace dozen of times but war kept being declared on France.
i remember my mum telling me a story of my great great grandfather(im a kid) during ww1 my great great grandfather fought and died at the last 6 hours of ww1.
17:54 When you kill their favourite colonel, you're fucked. Look at them from being being scared asf to charge the fort then all of them suddenly screaming and charging the fort when he gets shot. Nice.
Wasn’t it burnside who yet again fails miserably with his plans when he sends his men down into the crater ? Not the first time he’s done a folly . First was Antietam where he fought so hard to take a bridge which he by the end of it was pushed back across . And then the fourteen failed assaults on the stone wall at Fredricksburg
Hey, slight correction (not that you'll see this three years later) but the battle shown from The Patriot wasn't the "Battle of Yorktown." You were thinking of the Siege of Yorktown shown at the end of the movie. You showed the Battle of Cowpens.
I would have been to live in those times and to be an infantrymen! Literally line up just to shoot at each other not that far of a distance and the first army to retreat in out of fear would have been declared to winner unless you can outmaneuver your enemy. Must have been terrifying honestly
Even though the title is misleading as regards the Eras in which these battles took place, the movies themselves were spectacular. None so much though as Sergei Bondarchuk's "Waterloo". filmed using all live actors.
These wars talk about the napoleanic wars, the American civil war, the American revalotionary war, the zulu war, the mexo-american war, and the boshin war
I love all movies about the War how the Civil War and World War I and World War II You can put up a new video of the Chinese Civil and Chinese History War Movies, 🇨🇳❤❤❤❤❤
The European powers should’ve taken notes from the later battles of the civil war maybe some of the carnage of 1914 would’ve been avoided or at least not been as bad
They fought wars after the civil war themselves and they did Take Notes. WW1 was in another Level. The Americans came in late in WW1 repeating the mistakes of 1914
Just saying but I think that there should have been scenes from my all time favorite movie Gettysburg and the reason it’s my all time favorite movie is because the scenes of chamberlain on little round top where shot on the property of my 4x great grandparents but I also feel that there should have been scenes from the 1991 movie Ironclads which shows the two famous famous Ironclads the Uss Monitor which was built by Swedish born engineer John Ericsson and the ship was built in only 101 days but sadly On New Years Eve 1862 on its way to Beaufort North Carolina off of cape hatteras a heavy storm developed and the monitor foundered and sank but in 1949 it was rediscovered and from 1995 to 2002 the ship was brought back up to the surface and on August 5th 2002 the famous turret of the ship was brought up to the surface but inside the turret archeologists discovered two skeletons and on March 8th 2013 the skeletons were buried in Arlington National Cemetery with full military honors and today you can go see and touch the monitor at the mariners museum in Newport News Virginia but the other famous famous ship in the movie ironclads was the Uss Merrimack(1855) aka the CSS Virginia and how it became a confederate ship is in 1861 the union army was to destroy Gosport navy yard( now Norfolk Naval Shipyard) and on April 20th the U. S. Navy burned the Merrimack or so they thought because on May 28th confederate naval captain French Forrest decided to salvage the wreck of the Merrimack and then on May 30th confederate secretary of the navy Stephen Mallory the decided to convert the Merrimack into an ironclad which would be known as the CSS Virginia and it had Four Muzzle Loading single banded Brooke rifles and Six Smoothbore 9in(229m)Dahlgren Guns which were salvaged from the Merrimack but their was also 7inch (178m) pivot guns that weighed 14,500 pounds(6,600kg) each they fired a 104 Pound(47kg) shell and on March 8th the Virginia sunk the Uss Congress and Cumberland and then on March 9th the Virginia was going to Sink the Uss Minnesota but protecting the Minnesota was a for mentioned Monitor and then after the battle of Hampton Roads On May 9th 1862 The Merrimack aka CSS Virginia was Destroyed however you can still see the Anchor of the Virginia at the Museum of the confederacy.
@@SStupendous yes I know for certain that at the time of the battle of Gettysburg the area were chamberlain and the 20th Maine made their famous famous bayonet charge was on the property of my 4x great grandparents Jacob Weikert and Sarah Ickes Weikert
@@SStupendous oh okay yes little round top was owned by people like where the monuments to weed and warren is that was owned by the person who owned devils den while the eastern slope of little round top was owned by my ancestors
Correction dude the battle scene from the Patriot you featured is actually supposed to depict the Battle of Cowpens fought a few months before Yorktown and it was also an American victory but in real life unlike in the movie the battle was a quick and decisive victory for the Americans
one big question i have about waterloo is where was the british cavalry when the french cavalry attacked and forced the british into squares.why didnt the british cavalry help them out? or where they a spent force by that stage of the battle? only thing i can think of
For a start, why put two completely different conflicts together? Second, neither the Civil War nor the Napoleonic Wars are in 1700 or 1899.. Is this meant to be just depictions of warfare between those years?
Waterloo is an obvious choice if you want a movie on the Napoleonic wars and sure the movie Napoleon like many people say “suck” but at least their is a lot more variety in the uniforms and people don’t shit on that movie with the Romans fighting in a gorge like field
![Top 10 [EPIC] World War I (1914-1918) massive battles movie scenes (WW1)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/AK7OO97eU3Q/mqdefault.jpg)
![Top 10 [EPIC] World War I (1914-1918) massive battles movie scenes (WW1)](/img/tr.png)
![Top 10 [EPIC] modern (XXI) massive battles and special forces movie scenes (war, mass death, heroes)](/img/n.gif)
You got to love the older war films, practical effects and every soldier an actual man in uniform, just so much grander and better than having to rely on CGI which tends to note age well at all and looks dated by the time it comes out.
CGI are only used when the movie makes don't have enough budget if you realized these movies have stunt men which have to act dead. which cost a lot of money not to mention the horses the set etc.
CGI is used for when they didn't have enough extras. Even if they did they'd still add for more effects
@@doodlenoodle878 Doesn't cost a lot of money to play dead.
It's certainly noticeable how much better the pre-2000 movies were at telling a visual story. Not sure if CGI is to blame, but I suspect much of the darkness, confusion and shaky cam in the newer movies may be to hide too obvious CGI
@@blixbelliose3206 immersion
Waterloo is absolutely jaw dropping. They seriously don't make them like they used to. For better or worse.
Kinda helps when its Co-sponsored by Italy and the Soviet Union
I sure hope it's jaw dropping. It was one of the most expensive movies ever made.
They literally had to retrain tens of thousands of Soviet soldiers in Napoleonic warfare
Only Chinese can still do it. But they tend to use CGI too nowadays...
Not every day a country's military supplies 15,000 men to be used as soldiers in a historic military film.
Waterloo. No CGI. Amazing
Waterloo is one of my favourite war movies because of the sheer scale of the scenes and that everyone you see is an actor. I wouldn't be surprised if the number of actors are the same as the soldiers who took part in the wars.
literally an entire soviet cavalry regiment acted as extras
@@bigsoap186 Much more than that, my friend. Before filming even started, the Russian field engineers rebuilt the entire battlefield to exact specifications of houses and mud roads and hills and slopes. Everything. A massive undertaking as we are talking more than 20 square kilometers of landscape and buildings and what not.
And add to that the artillerymen and infantrymen alongside the cavalrymen. On BOTH sides. We are talking at least 2 army sized units taking part in the battle scenes plus all the logistics and food and quarters for the soldiers between filming the scenes, and the aforementioned engineering work.
And there is even more to it than the scenes and the filming. All these soldiers had to be taught the tactics and strategies and combat methods of the Napoleonic wars and then train it several times to make sure it worked as planned before dunning the French and German and British uniforms of the time.
All of these many thousand Russian troops of every kind deserves a huge applause and admiration. Because they carried the movie, and there wouldn't have been a movie if they didn't work so hard to make it right. I know that we in the west are not particularly fond of praising Russian soldiers, but these soldiers doing such a huge effort and showing such dedication really are a pride to Russia.
Waterloo has 17000 Soviet Infantry and a Brigade of Cavalrymen as extras and it was filmed in Ukraine. No joke.
thats amazing!
@@username1029-k8l It is! Imagine coordinating those 17000 men to march and all!
The last samurai, one of my favourite movies, it has been a long time since I watched it.
Imagine how GODDAM LOUD it would've been inside one of those ironclads.....
No more ears
Nobody could really equal the Waterloo-movie from 1970 until today....Its so intense and full of little details that its really umatched. A pity that there was never a directors cut or an extended version.
That movie is also just a tale. Hollywood-shit. It happened, ok. Had a big part of the history of the anglosaxons, new guys in Europe, not to large and famous history... Peoples (not NATIONS, not at all) with 600-800 years history. A part prooved, the other lied... As used at the anglo-saxons with collonies... If you are interested about a brave, the only in Europe, just start to learn reading and read books about scithian.parthian.hun.maghiars-hungarians. And try to learn from them. You will see, is a good idea...
@@istvantamas1202 the key to language is other people need to be able to understand what you are trying to communicate , maybe try again ?
The British uniform during the empire was just👌
tu veux dire des uniformes de tapette ! 😂
@@300-Spartacus They said British, not French. 😘
Loved all of these movies! Glory had the most amazing ending I have ever seen in a war movie.
It was like seeing a classical painting in real time, merged with symphonic music, exploding out of violence with a horrible outcome.
Glory's ending really drove home the point of the film: Not only are there things worth fighting for, but there are some things that are worth DYING for.
Waterloo is an absolute visual phenomenon.
Please watch Soviet Union version of War and Peace they used 3x times more men in their battles. 😊
th-cam.com/video/bIij-KQ0jYU/w-d-xo.html
That ambush shot from last of the Mohicans (you know the one) is like a moving painting.
The last samurai is my favorite Tom cruise movie
The way the ground rises with the underground detonation is astonishing.
Glory is the most epic civil war movie ever..change my mind
I liked gettysburg, the sountrack of gettysburg beautifull but both are great movies
Beautiful yet a tragic honor and bravery
Unfortunately, whenever we talk about greatest movies of all time, we all assume it’s got to be a Hollywood film.
The same gentleman who directed Waterloo (Steiger is the best Napoleon ever) also directed possibly the greatest film (any genre) of all time.
War and Peace 1966 was sponsored by the Soviet Union to show up Hollywood’s version in 1956 (Fonda and Hepburn). Director Sergei Bondarchuk (who also stars in the film) was given almost unlimited control to produce in my opinion, the finest pre CGI film period. Like the novel, the film is also quite long with heavy character build up between battles. The Borodino segment is the finest battle sequence of any war film….period. War and Peace in it’s entirety is a Soviet Masterpiece that can only be found on the Criterion channel.
Сам фильм безусловно хорош, но вот батальные сцены сняты не реалистично. Без компьютерной графики вообще вряд-ли было возможно сделать реалистично. Очень жаль, что у Бондарчука не было тогда такого инструмента.
Movies like Waterloo Alamo were all 20+ years old by the time I was born & they’re still better than many movies made today 2023! You just can’t beat real special effects and real individual people even with the best cgi. Just captures the viewers attention so well even now
i like how the horse in cold mountain who got knocked out just casually got up and walked away lol
Wow... Thank you for this EPIC compilation!
I’ve seen Glory and it was a great movie out of all of these I’ve seen
The battle of Crater more like the Massacre at the Crater cause Union soldiers got slaughtered
And they were told by the General go around the crater don’t go into it which due to the damage being done at the crater the men were shocked had sympathy for the enemy and decided to help the wounded
The officer who to lead the charge at the Crater didn't communicate the fact that they were to go around because he was dead drunk.
@@jameswilliams3241 correct
They chose him by drawing straws, stupid decision but the other officers had more experience then he did and didn’t order his men to go around it but the sympathy for the Union when they saw the dead and dying they had to do what they could there humanity to help the wounded the greedy to take souvenirs. Lead to the unfortunate deaths of so many men basically in Cold Mountain phrase “a turkey shoot”
Harder to find movies and scenes of this era so thanks for this !
I would like to that uniforms of 1810s Napoleonic were probably the Fanciest uniforms for any Army.
At 10:25 you can see a black British soldier in the background I would say some nice accuracy considering how inaccurate the patriot can be
Some slaves did serve as a soldier in the British army so yeah
holy shit finally found a bunch of movies set in musket & cannon bla bla something like that awesome
ya know in future if you keep doing this you get more sub and make an discord server 😂
Superheroes are awesome but what i really wanna see is a connected movie series about the napoleonic wars. It'll all end in waterloo like endgame does. Also they all need to be rated R because nobody's going to understand why cavalry was so effective at the time until they see arms and legs flying off from the sabers, skulls being crushed by hooves.
Maybe a series about Napoleon would be an good idea. There’s certainly enough material and Napoleon is such an fascinating character. As long as Ridley Scott stays as far away as possible from it, it could work if you find the right actors and respect the historical reality
The patriot is a great movie whos with me lads
The final battle scene depicted in the movie "The Patriot" is the Battle of Guildford Courthouse not the Battle of Yorktown.
I thought it was Cowpens.
The battle is actually a combination of both Cowpens and Guilford Court House.
Ain’t nuthin like the fresh smell of blackpowder and blood in the morning I live for battles like this just you and a musket against the Hordes of Hell
I watched a documentary one time about the siege of Petersburg, or the battle of the creator, the Union Commanding General in charge of the assault made his men practice for the attack while ex-miners and trench diggers dug that tunnel under the CSA trench, but after the explosion and the attack commenced, the Union forces did not expect to run into a the massive creater or the wall of dirt that stopped them dead in their tracks, at that point it wasn't much of a battle but more of a massacre
That battle was lost to the Union the minute they started to run forward. Every soldier who knew something about movement and close combat would have been able to tell the commanding officer that they needed to attack on each side of the crater and NOT run down into the crater. They litterally became the proverbial sitting ducks when they did that. The officer who sent them into the crater has to have been a total amateur.
@@Jens-Viper-Nobel in that we are in agreement, but if the commanding general in charge of the siege would have watch and took command like he should have instead of hiding and drinking whiskey then the siege at Petersburg would have been different than it turned out to be
bruh the cold mountain battle was just..... brutal
It wasn’t a battle. A slaughterx
Gran trabajo tomar las batallas sobresalientes de cada película, excelente 😊
I feel bad for all the horses that were in war RIP
Even though Ft. Wagner was never taken, the 54th enmasse got the closest. Never underestimate the power of men who will do anything for a commander they respect, but more than that... a commander they love.
Waterloo- Britain and Prussia vs France
Anglo-Sudan war- Britain and Ottomans vs Arabic’s
The battle of Alamo- Mexican Empire vs Texas
American civil war (Siege of Petersburg)- America vs the Slave states
American Revolution- Britain vs America, French Empire and Spanish Empire
British Civil war- Scotland vs Britain
American Civil war (Battle of Richmond, Virginia(End of the civil war)- America vs Slave states
Japanese Civil war(Battle of Kyūsuū)- Japan vs the Satsuma Rebellion
French and Indian war (North America(Ambush)- France vs the Mohicans (Indians)
American Civil war (Second battle of Fort Wagner, South Carolina)- America vs Slave states
British civil war? Scotland?
Alamo ! french and mexicain vs Texas !
Americain révolution ! england vs native and french army with amiral lafayette
In my opinion Waterloo is the best movie about Napoleonic times.
Keep going 😊😋
10:13 that is not the battle of Yorktown ,it’s the battle of Cowpens
I was about to comment on that, I’m surprised no one else hasn’t said anything about that.
it feels Truly Amazing if hearing those muskets Canons go BOOM N BANG watching dozens or hundreds of Men die its deadly but Satisfying to watch in Amaze.
Awesome 😍 bro
old war movies are the best ones because they didnt used CGI, every single soldier was is a actor and every effect is handmade
Waterloo amazing. All great films in their own right (except the Patriot of course)
Finaly, This list what i looking for.. Great thanks. 👍👍👍
@ 0:46 seriously no CGI no contest
The good thing is that with CGI movie horse don’t die…
Charge of the Light Brigade etc…
Any film, pre CGI, with horses usually sees fatalities something, especially true, with Waterloo😪❤️
In the Last of the Mohicans when the British left the fort in reality they had to give up their arms to the French and were completely helpless when the Native Americans were attacked them.
4:50 best acting ever
Last of the Mohicans, still one of the greatest Musket based movies out there.
As a french i Can Say Waterloo IS a very very good movie who showed the french deafeat , but english deafeat was near too , and the prussia Come ect , very nice movie
Very good ☺️
Wars were fought that brutally before modern times, I wonder if the higher tech, fancier but deadlier weapons today make it more terrifying than actually facing your enemy like back then.
The Four Feathers scene definitely gives me Bighorn vibes
Same situation where they're impossibly outnumbered and surrounded
Magnifique documentaire
New subscriber 👌
Napoleon didn't have any wish to dominate Europe. It's the allies that faced him with continual war, and Napoleon took advantage from their losses. The only solution was then to dominate continental Europe to isolate UK. Napoleon proposed peace dozen of times but war kept being declared on France.
😂😂😂
So he knew he would lose it if to dominate? Then why is he advancing Russia?
I actually felt bad for the union army in Cold Mountain
Well, I have to see all this movies
you got strikes on this one Top 10 [EPIC] ancient and medieval massive battles movie scenes of all time PART 1
Glory super film 👍
Gettysburg is not on this list? Zulu and Zulu Dawn would have also fallen in this time period.
Four Feathers is good but you wouldn't be doing volleys against cavalry at almost point blank haha. Independent fire orders would have been given.
@4:12 where is that explosion coming from
from a cannon duh
i remember my mum telling me a story of my great great grandfather(im a kid) during ww1 my great great grandfather fought and died at the last 6 hours of ww1.
3 of my ancestors faught in the battle of the alamo
la ultima batalla fue emocionante, buen trabajo
The Outlander battle is hilarious as you can take it as vikings invading the UK
Morgsm. Haz echo un poker. De. ASES CON ESTA PELÍCULA QUE. SON EPICAS
At 10 minutes, the Patriot clip was actually set at the battle of Cowpens in 1780
i´s a great movie war collection video, I just wish it showed the full battles instead of just a clip.
17:54 When you kill their favourite colonel, you're fucked. Look at them from being being scared asf to charge the fort then all of them suddenly screaming and charging the fort when he gets shot. Nice.
The Patriot does not depict the battle of Yorktown. Its battle is fictional.
14:53の騎馬兵好きだわ
Do you have any movies based on pike and shot warfare? There’s Alatriste and cromwell
Nobody talks about how revolutionary the ironclads really were
Wasn’t it burnside who yet again fails miserably with his plans when he sends his men down into the crater ? Not the first time he’s done a folly . First was Antietam where he fought so hard to take a bridge which he by the end of it was pushed back across . And then the fourteen failed assaults on the stone wall at Fredricksburg
It was. The disaster at the Crater was the final nail in his coffin and effectively ended his military career
so coolo man
Hey, slight correction (not that you'll see this three years later) but the battle shown from The Patriot wasn't the "Battle of Yorktown." You were thinking of the Siege of Yorktown shown at the end of the movie. You showed the Battle of Cowpens.
Yo straight up, some of those horses would have broken legs in that first cavalry charge scene
ahhhh man, When will Vietnam be able to make a movie of this scale?
I would have been to live in those times and to be an infantrymen! Literally line up just to shoot at each other not that far of a distance and the first army to retreat in out of fear would have been declared to winner unless you can outmaneuver your enemy. Must have been terrifying honestly
Waterloo is goated
Jesus is real he will be back soon!!!!!
This isn't a jes#s vid
7:15 sound speakerman gun baster ?
We are really missing out on "Gettysburg" here. The Charge of Little Round Top should've been here.
7:09 the fact he was a bit calm
also notice how light the barrel of that cannon is lmao
@@pyry1948 fr
The Real last Samourai was French ✊FR
Even though the title is misleading as regards the Eras in which these battles took place, the movies themselves were spectacular. None so much though as Sergei Bondarchuk's "Waterloo". filmed using all live actors.
These wars talk about the napoleanic wars, the American civil war, the American revalotionary war, the zulu war, the mexo-american war, and the boshin war
0:45. now thats a shot
I love all movies about the War how the Civil War and World War I and World War II
You can put up a new video of the Chinese Civil and Chinese History War Movies, 🇨🇳❤❤❤❤❤
The European powers should’ve taken notes from the later battles of the civil war maybe some of the carnage of 1914 would’ve been avoided or at least not been as bad
They fought wars after the civil war themselves and they did Take Notes. WW1 was in another Level. The Americans came in late in WW1 repeating the mistakes of 1914
Waterloo was a masterpiece. Plumber and the actor who played Napoleon should have received Oscar’s
Just saying but I think that there should have been scenes from my all time favorite movie Gettysburg and the reason it’s my all time favorite movie is because the scenes of chamberlain on little round top where shot on the property of my 4x great grandparents but I also feel that there should have been scenes from the 1991 movie Ironclads which shows the two famous famous Ironclads the Uss Monitor which was built by Swedish born engineer John Ericsson and the ship was built in only 101 days but sadly On New Years Eve 1862 on its way to Beaufort North Carolina off of cape hatteras a heavy storm developed and the monitor foundered and sank but in 1949 it was rediscovered and from 1995 to 2002 the ship was brought back up to the surface and on August 5th 2002 the famous turret of the ship was brought up to the surface but inside the turret archeologists discovered two skeletons and on March 8th 2013 the skeletons were buried in Arlington National Cemetery with full military honors and today you can go see and touch the monitor at the mariners museum in Newport News Virginia but the other famous famous ship in the movie ironclads was the Uss Merrimack(1855) aka the CSS Virginia and how it became a confederate ship is in 1861 the union army was to destroy Gosport navy yard( now Norfolk Naval Shipyard) and on April 20th the U. S. Navy burned the Merrimack or so they thought because on May 28th confederate naval captain French Forrest decided to salvage the wreck of the Merrimack and then on May 30th confederate secretary of the navy Stephen Mallory the decided to convert the Merrimack into an ironclad which would be known as the CSS Virginia and it had Four Muzzle Loading single banded Brooke rifles and Six Smoothbore 9in(229m)Dahlgren Guns which were salvaged from the Merrimack but their was also 7inch (178m) pivot guns that weighed 14,500 pounds(6,600kg) each they fired a 104 Pound(47kg) shell and on March 8th the Virginia sunk the Uss Congress and Cumberland and then on March 9th the Virginia was going to Sink the Uss Minnesota but protecting the Minnesota was a for mentioned Monitor and then after the battle of Hampton Roads On May 9th 1862 The Merrimack aka CSS Virginia was Destroyed however you can still see the Anchor of the Virginia at the Museum of the confederacy.
Almost certain that charge scene with Chamberlain was shot at the actual Little Round Top? Your 4x great grandparents owned it?
@@SStupendous yes I know for certain that at the time of the battle of Gettysburg the area were chamberlain and the 20th Maine made their famous famous bayonet charge was on the property of my 4x great grandparents Jacob Weikert and Sarah Ickes Weikert
@@chasemurraychristopherdola7108 I'm saying, didn't know Little Round Top was owned by someone
@@SStupendous oh okay yes little round top was owned by people like where the monuments to weed and warren is that was owned by the person who owned devils den while the eastern slope of little round top was owned by my ancestors
ÉPICO
Correction dude the battle scene from the Patriot you featured is actually supposed to depict the Battle of Cowpens fought a few months before Yorktown and it was also an American victory but in real life unlike in the movie the battle was a quick and decisive victory for the Americans
one big question i have about waterloo is where was the british cavalry when the french cavalry attacked and forced the british into squares.why didnt the british cavalry help them out? or where they a spent force by that stage of the battle? only thing i can think of
The patriot may have been Saratoga… Yorktown was a siege.
It’s supposed to be a depiction of the Battle of Cowpens. Yorktown is actually shown later in the movie too.
No Gettysburg, SMH no coffee for you.
can you make one from world war 2
For a start, why put two completely different conflicts together? Second, neither the Civil War nor the Napoleonic Wars are in 1700 or 1899.. Is this meant to be just depictions of warfare between those years?
It says in the title 1700-1899 as in the year 1700 through 1899.
@@ricklopez8431 Thanks for the clarification (and the coffee), lad :)
Waterloo is an obvious choice if you want a movie on the Napoleonic wars and sure the movie Napoleon like many people say “suck” but at least their is a lot more variety in the uniforms and people don’t shit on that movie with the Romans fighting in a gorge like field