I built the glotz parallel unloader and it worked first time. I was so excited I built that thing split screen with a 2nd Minecraft launcher open next to it of a creative world where I could triple check all the redstone signals to make sure I was building all the filters correctly, and and putting all the correct item counts into comparator outputs correctly. I was really happy when it worked first time 😂
The search-based temp doesn't necessarily have to be slow. You can tile multiple box searching slices (like Samos' box searcher). Then, when items come in, you wait until you have enough unique item types to fill all the slices, then run the whole list of boxes over them pair each box with its match. This way, you can have theoretically as much parallelization as you want (however, in practice, something like 8 slices should be sufficient). Another thing to note: if the 2x array is too slow, a cycle based array is actually pretty viable for split boxes and can actually compete in speed with the set based one.
@@jrubik33Yes, but you have to consider the reason for that. The cycle-based array only performed so mucy worse than the set-based array because it was unable to detect beforehand whether there would be a box that would hold up the system. If the boxes were split, you could simply compare the signal strengths of the boxes to eliminate that problem.
Great video. But Is there a design which combines all of these into one? I was hoping for a complete system. Coming off a project and have many chests of shulkers to merge and sort into bulk.
![เจ็บที่ยังฮัก - ม่อน วรวิทย์ [ Official Mv ] จอนนี่มิวสิค](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KALIGSRSjFs/mqdefault.jpg)
WDL: www.mediafire.com/file/2g0lzjbvqghhjn2/Var+Sorting.zip/filev
Interesting results and great video!
I built the glotz parallel unloader and it worked first time. I was so excited I built that thing split screen with a 2nd Minecraft launcher open next to it of a creative world where I could triple check all the redstone signals to make sure I was building all the filters correctly, and and putting all the correct item counts into comparator outputs correctly. I was really happy when it worked first time 😂
this vid had me glued to my screen, i absolutely love storage tech. very glad theres such an active community for it
The search-based temp doesn't necessarily have to be slow. You can tile multiple box searching slices (like Samos' box searcher). Then, when items come in, you wait until you have enough unique item types to fill all the slices, then run the whole list of boxes over them pair each box with its match. This way, you can have theoretically as much parallelization as you want (however, in practice, something like 8 slices should be sufficient).
Another thing to note: if the 2x array is too slow, a cycle based array is actually pretty viable for split boxes and can actually compete in speed with the set based one.
didnt the cycle based unloader give really bad results?
@@jrubik33Yes, but you have to consider the reason for that. The cycle-based array only performed so mucy worse than the set-based array because it was unable to detect beforehand whether there would be a box that would hold up the system. If the boxes were split, you could simply compare the signal strengths of the boxes to eliminate that problem.
I just love watching these videos like I understand them.
another jayrussy W
Very well put together video!
Awesome video!
Lets go jayjay
slay jayrussy 💅
Trying to get into to the redstone world, and I think this is a little bit much for my feeble brain.
very interesting
I love how u used gnome thing to it purpose
Awesome video!
:llamaengineer:
Great video. But Is there a design which combines all of these into one? I was hoping for a complete system. Coming off a project and have many chests of shulkers to merge and sort into bulk.
sorry jay, i have betrayed you by not commenting on this video yet
anyway here is the obligatory keep yourself safe
@13:08 there's a campfire in one of the partial boxes from the splitter
And? It was also in the inputed shulker box.
@@jx5b I have since forgotten
jayrussy
Nice video dude! But what is that background music. Its way too chaotic and throws you off when trying to listen
I kinda like it...
Great video!